genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

68
Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and putative endophenotypes in major depressive disorder Ph.D. Thesis Timea Anna Bianchi-Rimay, M.D. SZEGED 2016

Upload: hadan

Post on 02-Feb-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

Genetic and environmental risk factors,

informative subtypes and putative

endophenotypes in major depressive disorder

Ph.D. Thesis

Timea Anna Bianchi-Rimay, M.D.

SZEGED

2016

Page 2: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

2

Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative

subtypes and putative endophenotypes in major depressive

disorder

Ph.D. Thesis

Timea Anna Bianchi-Rimay, M.D.

Faculty of Medicine

University of Szeged

Supervisors:

Ágnes Vetró, M.D. Ph.D.

Krisztina Kapornai, M.D. Ph.D.

Department of Child- and Adolescent Psychiatry

Department of Pediatrics and Child Health Center

SZEGED

2016

Page 3: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

3

PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO THE THESIS

I. J.S. Strauss, N.L. Freeman, S.A. Shaikh, A. Vetro, E. Kiss, K. Kapornai, G. Daroczi, T.

Rimay, V.O. Kothencne, E. Dombovari, E. Kaczvinszky, Zs. Tamas, I. Baji, M. Besnyo, J.

Gádoros, V. DeLuca, C.J. George, E. Dempster, C.L. Barr, M. Kovacs, J.L. Kennedy (2010). No

association between oxytocin or prolactin gene variants and childhood-onset mood disorders.

Psychoneuroendocrinology 35 (9): 1422-1428. [IF:5,168]

II. T. Rimay, I. Benak, E. Kiss, I. Baji, A. Feher, A. Juhasz, J. Strauss, J. Kennedy, C. Barr, M.

Kovacs, A. Vetro, K. Kapornai and the International Consortium of Childhood-Onset Mood

disorders (2015). BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism and Stressful Life Events in Melancholic

Childhood-Onset Depression. Psychiatric Genetics 25:249–255. [IF:1.94].

III. A. Vetro, I. Baji., I. Benak, M. Besnyo, J. Csorba, G. Daroczy, E. Dombovari, E. Kiss, J.

Gadoros, E. Kaczvinszky, K. Kapornai, L. Mayer, T. Rimay, D. Skultety, K. Szabo, Zs. Tamas,

J. Szekely, M. Kovacs (2009). "Risk factors for childhood depression"-research design,

implementation, proceedings: history of 13 years: experience in grant preparation, writing,

organization in connection with an American NIMH Grant. Psychiatria Hungarica 24 (1): 6-17.

ABSTRACTS RELATED TO THE THESIS

I. T. Rimay, G. Daroczi, E. Kovacs, I. Benak, A. Feher, A. Juhasz, A. Vetro and M. Kovacs

(2010). Preliminary study investigating the interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism and the

somatic type of depression. European Neuropsychopharmacology 20:S225.

II. T. Rimay, G. Daróczi, E. Kovács, I. Benák, Á. Fehér, A. Juhász, Á. Vetró, M. Kovacs:

Preliminary study investigating the interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism and the somatic

type of depression 23rd European College of Neuropsychopharmacology Congress Amsterdam,

The Netherlands, 28 August-1 September 2010. p.:48.

Page 4: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

4

III. T. Rimay, G. Daróczi, E. Kovács, I. Benák, Á. Fehér, A. Juhász, Á. Vetró, M. Kovacs:

BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depressed children and their siblings 4th International

Romanian-Hungarian Psychiatric Congress, Miercurea Ciuc, Romania, 24-26. June 2010. p.:61.

IV. T. Rimay, G. Daróczi, E. Kovács, I. Benák, Á. Fehér, A. Juhász, Á. Vetró, M. Kovacs:

Interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism in childhood onset depression Hungarian Child

Neurology, Child Neurosurgery and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Association 35rd Annual

Meeting, Szeged, Hungary, 27-29. May 2010. p.:16

V. T. Rimay, G. Daróczi, E. Kovács, I. Benák, Á. Fehér, A. Juhász, Á. Vetró, M. Kovacs: Brain-

derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism in depressed children and adolescent

population Clinical Neurogenetics from Diagnosis to Therapy, Hungarian Society of Clinical

Neurogenetics, VIIIth Conference, Visegrád, Hungary, 4-5. December 2009. p.:38.

VI. A. Vetró, J. Gádoros, I. Baji, K. Kapornai, E. Kiss, T. Rimay, L. Mayer, M. Kovacs: What is

News in Childhood Onset Depression in Hungary International Conference Sponsored by

European Society for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Budapest, Hungary, 22-26. August 2009.

p.:23.

VII. T. Rimay, G. Daróczi, E. Kovács, I. Benák, Á. Fehér, A. Juhász, Á. Vetró, M. Kovacs:

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism in depressed children and their

siblings Hungarian Child Neurology, Child Neurosurgery and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Association 34rd Annual Meeting, Kecskemét, Hungary, 23-25. April 2009. p.:76.

Page 5: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

5

ABSTRACT

Introduction and hypotheses: Gene polymorphisms that are suspected of playing a role in the

development of childhood onset depression are examined in our work. Furthermore, we examine

symptoms or symptom groups that can be considered as homogeneous types or endophenotypes

of depression, and can be associated with the investigated genotypes or alleles. Oxytocin (OXT)

and prolactin (PRL) are neuropeptide hormones that interact with the serotonin system and are

involved in the stress response and social affiliation. In human studies, serum OXT and PRL

levels have been associated with depression and related phenotypes. Both brain-derived

neurotrophic factor (BDNF) polymorphisms and interferon-gamma +874 T/A polymorphism

have been examined for their contribution to depression with equivocal results. More

homogeneous phenotypes might be used to improve our understanding of genetic liability to

depression.

The aim of our work was to 1) determine if single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the loci

for OXT and PRL and their receptors, OXTR and PRLR, were associated with childhood-onset

mood disorders (COMD). 2) to test for association between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and

childhood onset melancholic depression and 3) to investigate the interferon-gamma +874 T/A

polymorphism and the somatic type of depression.

We also examined the interactive effects of stressful life events (SLE) and the Val66Met

polymorphism on the risk of childhood onset melancholic depression.

Materials and Methods: Using 678 families in a family-based association design, we genotyped

16 SNPs at OXT, PRL, OXTR and PRLR to test for association with COMD. Examining the

BDNF, in the preliminary studies and the following case-control studies, first subsets, then a

sample of 583 depressed probands were involved (55 from the somatic type of depression, 162 of

the melancholic subtype). Diagnoses were derived via the Interview Schedule for Children and

Adolescents - Diagnostic Version and life event data were collected by means of an Intake

General Information Sheet.

Page 6: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

6

Results: No significant associations were found for SNPs in the OXTR, PRL, or PRLR genes.

Two of three SNPs of the OXT gene were associated with COMD (p=0.02), significant after

spectral decomposition, but were not significant after additionally correcting for the number of

genes.

In the „preliminary BDNF study”, regarding the melancholic subtype, BDNF Val66Val genotype

had a significantly higher frequency in the melancholic depressed group than in the controls

(p=0.024). In the study examining the whole sample of depressed probands, 27.8% of the

participants met criteria for melancholy. In the melancholic group the proportion of the females

was higher (53.1%), though there were more males in the overall depressed sample. We detected

no significant differences in genotype or allele frequency between the melancholic and the non-

melancholic depressed group. BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and stressful life event interaction

was not significantly associated with the melancholy outcome.

Regarding the association of somatic type of depression and the interferon-gamma +874 T/A

polymorphism, the frequencies of the A allele containing genotypes were higher in the somatic

subtype, than in the comparison group, without statistically significant difference (T/A: SB

(sickness behaviour) group: 60.0%, comparison group: 51.1%; A/A: SB group: 21.8%,

comparison group: 13.3%; p=0.122). The comparison of allele frequencies also did not reveal

statistically significant differences (T: SB group: 48.2%, comparison group: 61.1%; A: SB

group: 51.8%, comparison group: 38.9%; p>0.1).

Conclusion: In our study, females were more prone to develop the early-onset melancholic

phenotype. The present work is the first genetic analysis to examine the association between

variants in the oxytocin and prolactin neuroendocrine genes and depression with onset in

childhood. To our knowledge, this is also the first study to investigate the differentiating effect of

the genotype and the G×E interaction on melancholic phenotype in a large sample of depressed

young patients. We didn’t find association between the melancholic subtype of major depression

and the BDNF genotype and stressful life event interaction and the somatic subtype of

childhood-onset major depression and the interferon-gamma +874 T/A polymorphism in this

large sample, which is representative to the Hungarian clinic-referred population of depressed

youths.

Page 7: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

7

List of abbreviations

AVP Arginine Vasopressin

AVPR1B Vasopressin V1b Receptor Gene

BED Best Estimate Diagnosis

BDNF Brain- Derived Neurotrophic Factor

CDI Children Depression Inventory

COD Childhood-Onset Depression

COMD Childhood-Onset Major Depression

D Depression

DNA Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid

DSC Depressive Symptom Checklist

DSM-III Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 3rd Edition

DSM-IV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th Edition

FET Fisher´s Exact Test

G×E Gene–Environment Interaction

GIS General Information Sheet

HPA Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal

IFN-γ Interferon-gamma

IGIS Intake General Information Sheet

IGR Intergenic Region

ISCA Interview Schedule for Children and

Adolescents

ISCA-D-PL

Interview Schedule for Children and

Adolescents Diagnostic Version Present

and Lifetime

LD Linkage Disequilibrium

LRS Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic

Page 8: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

8

MCN Magnocellular Neuron

MDD Major Depressive Disorder

MEL Melancholic

MFU Mail-Follow-up Test Package

NIMH National Institute of Mental Health

NMEL Nonmelancholic

OXT Oxytocin

OXTR Oxytocin Receptor

PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction

POE Parent-of-origin Effects

PRL Prolactin

PRLR Prolactin Receptor

RR Relative Risk

SD Standard Deviation

SLE Stressful Life Event

SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

SNPSpD Single Nucleotide Polymorphism

Spectral Decomposition

SR-GIS General Information Sheet-Short

version

STOD Somatic Type of Depression

Tr Transmitted

TDT Transmission Disequilibrium Test

Un Untransmitted

5-HTTLPR Serotonin-Transporter-Linked

Polymorphic Region

Page 9: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

9

Table of contents PUBLICATIONS RELATED TO THE THESIS ...................................................................... 3

ABSTRACTS RELATED TO THE THESIS ............................................................................ 3

ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... 5

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 11

1.1. Background ....................................................................................................................11 1.2.1. Oxytocin and prolactin genes .................................................................................11

1.2.2. BDNF gene .............................................................................................................12

1.2.3 Inflammatory cytokine gene variant ........................................................................15

1.3. Factors which may influence the link between genetic liability and depression ...........15 1.3.1. Melancholic phenotype of depression ....................................................................15

1.3.2. Somatic type of depression .....................................................................................16

1.3.3. Role of stressful life events .....................................................................................16

1.4. Aims and hypotheses .....................................................................................................18 2. Methods .................................................................................................................................... 19

2.1. Participants, enrolment and assessment procedures in the Childhood Onset Major Depression study .........................................................................................................19

2.1.1. Study 1. Investigating the oxytocin or prolactin gene variants ...............................22

2.1.2. Preliminary studies testing the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depressed children

and their unaffected siblings ....................................................................................22

2.1.3. Study 2. Investigating the melancholic and the nonmelancholic depressed groups23

2.1.4. Study 3. Investigating the interferon-gamma +874 T/A polymorphism ................24

2.2. Diagnostic tools and questionnaires ...............................................................................25 2.2.1. Intake General Information Sheet for Children and Adolescents (IGIS) ...............25

2.2.2. Interview Schedule for Children and Adolescents – Diagnostic Version Present and

Lifetime (ISCA-D-PL) ............................................................................................25

2.2.3. Children Depression Inventory-Short Version (CDI-Short Form) .........................26

2.3. Statistical analyses and laboratory methods ..................................................................27 2.3.1. Statistical analyses ..................................................................................................27

2.3.2. Laboratory methods ................................................................................................28

Page 10: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

10

3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 31

3.1. Investigating the OXT, OXTR, PRL, and PRLR genes in child and youth depression...31 3.2. The preliminary studies investigating the role of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in

childhood onset depression ..........................................................................................34 3.3. BDNF Val66Met genotype and allele distributions in melancholic and non-melancholic

depressed participants and examining whether the past exposure to SLEs interacts with BDNF to predict the melancholic subtype ...................................................................35

3.4. Investigating the association between interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism and the somatic type of depression ..........................................................................................40

4. Discussion................................................................................................................................. 41

Strengths and Limitations .......................................................................................................... 45

Conclusions .................................................................................................................................. 46

Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... 47

References .................................................................................................................................... 48

Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 66

Page 11: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

11

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a major public health problem representing the leading

cause of disability in developed countries and the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide.

Lifetime risk for developing MDD is estimated to be approximately 15% (Kessler et al., 2003).

Mortality risk of depressed patients is two times greater than that of the general population due to

direct (suicide) and indirect causes (Cuijpers and Smit, 2002).

It is well documented that MDD is most likely resulted from complex interactions of genetic,

epigenetic, environmental and developmental factors, nevertheless the exact mechanisms

underlying the disease are still largely unknown (e.g. Ebmeier et al., 2006). There is fairly

consistent evidence that childhood onset depression (COD) has familial determinants (Rice et al.,

2002). For example, in a large twin study the hereditability for MDD was 29% in males and 42%

in females, respectively (Kendler et al., 2006). Levinson (2006) estimated the genetic

contribution to the development of MDD as 40-50%.

To achieve the goal of developing more effective treatment for MDD, a greater understanding of

the neurobiology of psychopathology and the identification of the risk and resilience factors are

needed.

1.2. Putative genetic liability to depression 1.2.1. Oxytocin and prolactin genes Molecular genetic studies of depression-related phenotypes in paediatric samples are relatively

few in number, with many focused on serotonin system genes. Genetic association studies of

variants in the serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) and serotonin receptor (e.g. 5HT1A, 1B, 2A)

genes have found weak, inconsistent associations with depression (Lemonde et al., 2003; Parsey

et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2004; Caspi et al., 2003; Lotrich and Pollock, 2004; Surtees et al.,

2006; McMahon et al., 2006). This suggests that genes outside of the serotonergic system, may

also be important in the aetiology of depressive disorders such as childhood-onset mood disorder

(COMD). Oxytocin (OXT) and prolactin (PRL) are neuropeptide hormones that have been

Page 12: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

12

shown to be associated with antidepressant activity, to interact with the serotonin system and to

be involved in the stress response and the formation of social bonds.

Oxytocin has been proposed to balance the suppression of the serotonergic system by the

hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis (HPA) following stressful events (Legros, 2001) and reduce

anxiety (Domes et al., 2007). Evidence from animal and human investigation supports the notion

of a relationship between oxytocin and serotonin systems (Emiliano et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2003;

Amico et al., 2004). Published studies suggest that stress and fear induce compensatory (Windle

et al., 2004; Ebner et al., 2005; Kirsch et al., 2005) changes in OXT expression. Human

biomarker studies provide another line of evidence implicating oxytocin in depressive symptoms

(Zetzsche et al., 1996; Bell et al., 2006; Scantamburlo et al., 2007; Cyranowski et al., 2008;

Costa et al., 2009).

Prolactin secretion is also dependent on the serotonergic system. Human serum PRL levels have

been shown to reflect serotonergic function via D-fenfluramine challenge (Lee et al., 2003;

Mann et al., 1995). Studies show that the prolactin response to D-fenfluramine and serotonergic

agents is blunted in depressed individuals compared to controls (Mann et al., 1995; Heninger et

al., 1984; Golden et al., 1992; Anderson et al., 1992; Papakostas et al., 2006). Several papers

show stress-induced increases in PRL (Drago et al., 1990; Bodnár et al., 2004; Torner et al.,

2004). The postpartum antidepressant-like effects of lactation may be mediated by the parity of

the mother (Sibolboro Mezzacappa and Endicott, 2007). Plasma PRL levels in response to

tryptophan challenge are associated with neuroticism, a correlate of depressive disorders

(Brummett et al., 2008). Still other results support an OXT-PRL feedback loop in the

hypothalamus (Liu and Ben-Jonathan, 1994; Kokay et al., 2006).

1.2.2. BDNF gene

Numerous other candidate genes have been studied as potential risk factors for COD (Rice,

2010), including the BDNF locus. BDNF Val66Met is a SNP of nucleotide 196 in exon 5,

resulting in a Val/Met amino acid change in codon 66, affecting the pro-BDNF sequence, with

no functional effect on the mature BDNF, but causing changes in its cellular transport and

secretion.

Page 13: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

13

Figure 1. BDNF polymorphism

The encoded protein is a neurotrophin, playing a role in hippocampal dendritic morphology and

synaptic function. It has been implicated in depression, evidenced by decreased hippocampal

volume and hippocampal and serum BDNF levels associated with the disease. (Savitz and

Drevets, 2009; Sen et al., 2008, Cardoner et al., 2013). The presence of the Val66Met Met allele

has been associated with inefficient secretion of BDNF regardless of gender (Egan et al., 2003;

Ozan et al., 2010) and decreased serum BDNF levels were found in patients with depression

(Ozan et al., 2010).

Page 14: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

14

Figure 2. Cellular transport and secretion of BDNF

In a sample of adults with a history of childhood onset mood disorder (COMD) (Strauss et al.,

2004) the BDNF Val66Met-(GT)n two marker Val/short (<170 bp) haplotype was associated with

COMD, but no significant association was found between the examined BDNF polymorphisms

and childhood-onset mood disorder by allelic or genotypic analysis. In another study, the same

authors examined a sample of 258 Hungarian trios including juvenile probands with COMD and

found the BDNF Val66Met Val allele to be associated with the disorder (Strauss et al., 2005).

Importantly, the present study is performed on a subset of the same Hungarian sample.

Noteworthy, a meta-analysis of Chen et al. (2008) did not confirm the association between

Val66Met polymorphism and depression. Also, in contrast to the often reported association

between the BDNF polymorphism and depression, the meta-analysis of Verhagen et al. (2010)

suggests only a gender-dependent role of the polymorphism in the development of depression, as

significant association was found only in males.

Page 15: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

15

1.2.3 Inflammatory cytokine gene variant

It is known that the genetic variants of inflammatory cytokines can play a role in the appearance

of depression (Misener et al., 2008). In a previous study, increased interferon-gamma (IFNγ)

level was found in a sample of adolescents with major depression (Gabbay et al., 2009). Another

study showed that the increase in the level of interferon-gamma correlates with the interferon-

gamma +874 T/A single nucleotide polymorphism (Pravica et al., 2000).

1.3. Factors which may influence the link between genetic liability and depression

1.3.1. Melancholic phenotype of depression

In this work a number of factors are considered that could contribute to and/or moderate the

liability to depression. The limited success of genetic studies might arise from current

classification schemas including DSM-IV, since they are based on clusters of syndromes in a

heterogeneous patient group (Hasler et al., 2004). MDD as defined in DSM-IV is a

heterogeneous disorder with regard to etiology, symptoms and level of functioning and response

to treatment (Domschke et al., 2010).

One of the clinical subtypes of MDD that showed distinct clinical (Kessler et al., 1997b) and

biochemical (Maes et al., 1990) features was melancholic depression (Gold et al. 2002). Schotte

et al. (1997) provided the validation through cluster analysis of melancholic and non-

melancholic subtypes of unipolar depression.

A promising attempt has been made to determine the nosological status and diagnostic strategies

to melancholia (Parker and Paterson, 2014). Furthermore, several biological markers have been

suggested to identify this putative endophenotype. The preliminary results of Bracht et al.,

(2013) suggest that the melancholic subtype of MDD is characterized by white matter

microstructure alterations of the medial forebrain bundle compared to healthy controls, while it

did not differ between the healthy controls and the overall MDD sample. Though some studies

claim that psychomotor retardation is a feature of depression (Widlöcher et al., 1983, Dantchev,

1998), some authors suggested that psychomotor retardation allows determining putative

endophenotypes such as melancholy (Bennabi et al., 2013, Parker et al., 1996). Preliminary

evidence suggests that genetic factors may discriminate melancholic and non-melancholic

depression in a putatively interesting preliminary study of Quinn et al. (2012) with low sample

Page 16: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

16

size. The authors (Quinn et al., 2012) found that the BDNF rs6265 Met allele predisposes non-

melancholic depression and the interaction of the BDNF rs6265 Met allele and stressful life

event (SLE) predicts non-melancholia over main effects. Furthermore, in a study of Patas et al.

(2014) investigating the association between serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and plasma

interleukin-6 in major depressive disorder, plasma interleukin-6 was found to be a positive

predictor of BDNF only in the melancholic sample. According to Harkness et al. (2006) subjects

with severe melancholic depression are more sensitive to stress, with episodes being influenced

by more minor stressors than those of non-melancholic patients.

1.3.2. Somatic type of depression

Another putatively interesting phenotype is the somatic type of depression (STOD).

Inflammatory cytokines induce behavioural symptoms, known as sickness behaviour (SB), that

are similar to symptoms seen in depression (fatigue, altered sleep patterns, psychomotor

retardation, social withdrawal, appetite loss, anhedonia and impaired cognitive function). INF-γ

is primarily secreted by T-lymphocytes, it usually provokes fatigue, malaise, headache, lack of

appetite, weight loss, weakness, lethargy and decreased concentration, which can all be

symptoms of depression (Fent et al., 1987, Triozzi et. al., 1990). This similarity led to the theory

that the imbalance of inflammatory cytokines can contribute to the development of depression.

1.3.3. Role of stressful life events

Indeed, the role of stressful life events has been proven in depression (Kessler et al., 1997a) and

several studies showed the effect of gene by environment (G×E) interaction on mood disorders.

Many environmental factors have been identified, including early and recent stressful life events

(Caspi et al., 2003) and parental depression (Bouma et al., 2008), which may interact with the

genetic background (Ebmeier et al., 2006). For example, the short allele of the serotonin

transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism compared to the long allele exhibited more depression and

suicidality in relation to stressful life events in a number of studies (Caspi et al., 2003, Kaufman

et al., 2004, Eley et al., 2004). Although this association was not confirmed in the meta-analysis

of Risch et al. (2009), it thus seems that MDD is caused by numerous interacting genetic and

non-genetic factors.

Page 17: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

17

In a study of Bukh et al. (2009) the Met allele of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism was

independently associated with the presence of SLEs prior to the onset of depression and in a

paper of Elzinga et al. (2011) BDNF Met allele carriers were found to be sensitive to early SLEs.

Kim et al. (2007) found significant interaction of stressful life events and BDNF Met/Met and

Val/Met genotypes on the risk of depression. In a study of Chen et al. (2012) on a sample of 780

pairs of ethnic Han Chinese adolescent twins, authors found that the BDNF Val allele modulates

the influence of environmental stress on depression. Interaction between BDNF Val66Met

polymorphism and environmental stress on depression was found even when separating pure

environmental factors from the environmental factors under partial genetic control and adopting

a prospective longitudinal design (Chen et al., 2013). In a study of Hosang et al. (2014) the Met

allele of BDNF significantly moderates the relationship between life stress and depression, the

association being stronger for an interaction with stressful life events and weaker for interaction

of BDNF Val66Met with childhood adversity. In the study of Brown et al. (2014) the Met alleles

of BDNF Val66Met significantly moderated the relationship between recent life events and adult

onsets of depression, though BDNF did not significantly influence the effect of childhood

maltreatment on chronic depression.

An illustrative example of how difficult it is to find replicable gene-MDD associations is

provided by a study by Bosker and colleagues (2011). In their meta-analysis of 92 single

nucleotide polymorphisms from 57 candidate genes previously reported to be significantly

associated with MDD only four SNPs from four genes were found to replicate. Even these

associations may turn out to be false positives due to multiple testing.

Genome wide association studies, up to date best suited for detecting variants with minor effect

(Shyn et al., 2010) haven’t shown genome-wide significant findings, though their non-significant

top signals may be promising. Top signals may point to the possible role of synaptic processes in

the genetic background of depression (Sullivan et al., 2009, Shyn et al., 2011). A number of

classical pathways were associated with depression, firstly those of monoamines, from which the

most commonly examined pathways are serotonergic, dopaminergic and noradrenergic pathways

and the nitric oxide pathway (Smoller, 2016).

Page 18: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

18

1.4. Aims and hypotheses

1) We tested whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at the loci for OXT, PRL and

their receptors are associated with childhood-onset mood disorders (COMD).

Based on our preliminary studies regarding the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in

depressed children and their siblings, to improve our knowledge about the potential

genetic contributors to the melancholic type of depression, we examined whether an

effect of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, and interaction of the BDNF Val66Met

polymorphism with stressful life events could differentiate juvenile melancholic and non-

melancholic patients.

2) Specifically, we hypothesized that:

a. Melancholic and non-melancholic depressed probands are characterized by

different BDNF Val66Met genotype and allele distributions

b. Past exposure to stressful life events interacts with the BDNF Val66Met

polymorphism to predict a melancholic depression phenotype

Furthermore, we examined the possible association between interferon-gamma +874 T/A

single nucleotide polymorphism and the development of a symptomatically homogenous

type of childhood onset depression.

3) We hypothesized that:

Depressed probands showing and those not showing the investigated group of somatic

symptoms are characterized by different IFN-γ +874 T/A gene and allele distributions

These studies are innovatively integrating recent work on the molecular genetics of childhood-

onset MDD.

Page 19: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

19

2. Methods

2.1. Participants, enrolment and assessment procedures in the Childhood Onset Major Depression study

In our present work we report on three different but connected studies using depressed probands

and their unaffected siblings on a large sample, which is representative to the Hungarian

outpatient and clinic-referred population of depressed youths as the recruitment sites supported

more than approximately 85% of the newly referred cases during the study period.

Figure 3. Description of the entire sample and the identified subgroups

COMD Study Sample

Probands N=538

Preliminary

study- Depressed probands

N=95

Probands N=100

MDD probands N=716

Siblings N=1177

Probands N=678

Unaffected siblings over 18 years

N=100

Melancholic group N=162

Nonmelancholic group N=421

SB group N=55

-sb group N=45

Affected siblings N=177

Study 1

Study 2

Study 3

Preliminary study

Extended preliminary Study Probands N=210

Page 20: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

20

Table 1. Descriptions of the samples and hypotheses

Subsample

Hypotheses Group

Comparator group

Study 1 (oxytocin and

prolactin)

678 probands and 177 affected

siblings -

Association of OXT and PRL and their receptors with COMD

Preliminary (BDNF)

95 /210 probands

100 unaffected siblings

Association of BDNF Val66Met with depression and melancholy

Study 2 (BDNF X SLE)

162 melancholic probands

421 non-melancholic

probands

Association of BDNF Val66Met with melancholy and role of

interaction with SLE

Study 3 (IFNγ +874)

55 probands showing somatic

symptoms

45 probands without somatic

symptoms

Association of IFNγ +874 with somatic symptoms

The data derive from a multidisciplinary Program Project studying genetic and psychosocial risk

factors for COMD. The project was conducted in Hungary, in collaboration with Pittsburgh

University, NIMH grant #MH056193. The sample includes in total 716 depressed probands,

recruited from 23 mental health facilities across the country, including 7 child and adolescent

psychiatry inpatient units. Screening of probands was performed from 01.11.1999 to 01.07.2005.

Signed consent from the parents and assent from the children were obtained from all subjects in

accordance with the Hungarian National Health and the Regional Human Investigation Review

Board guidelines, in accordance with the legal requirements in Hungary and the University of

Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. Table 1 and figure 3 describes the entire sample and shows the

identified subgroups. Inclusion criteria were the following: DSM-IV diagnosis of MDD with the

onset of the first episode from 7.0 years by age 14.9 and being free of mental retardation and

major systemic medical disorders, with at least one biologic parent and a 7 –17.9-year-old sibling

available. At first, children were selected on the basis of a depressive symptom screen, the short

version of the Children's Depression Inventory (Kovacs et al., 2003), having to reach the cut-off

score for inclusion. The instrument was selected during the course of a pilot study to maximize

sensitivity and specificity. Screen cut-off and also screening measure used were adjusted during

the recruitment phase in order to minimize false positives. The diagnostic procedure included an

Page 21: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

21

audiotaped semi-structured Interview Schedule for Children and Adolescents - Diagnostic

Version (ISCA-D), an extension of the Interview Schedule for Children and Adolescents (ISCA)

(Sherrill et al., 2000). The interviewers were child- and adolescent psychiatrists and

psychologists, who completed 3 months of didactic and practical training in the interview

technique (an average of 85% symptom-agreement reached on 5 consecutive videotaped

interviews against “gold standard” interview ratings provided by the trainers). Interrater

reliability on ISCA-D symptoms was satisfactory.

Ratings were obtained both for current and past symptoms of DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses

and major DSM-III disorders (e.g. depression with melancholic features). The evaluation

consisted of 2 different parts, conducted by different clinicians, approximately 6 weeks apart.

The diagnostic assessment for the participants enrolled in this study has been described further in

detail previously (Kapornai et al., 2007; Kiss et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2006). Importantly, to

establish depressive episodes and symptoms, we performed two independent semi-structured

diagnostic interviews during the intake procedure rated by trained clinicians, and subsequently

evaluated by Best-Estimate Diagnostic Procedure (Maziade et al., 1992). The “Mood Disorder

Module” of the semi-structured diagnostic interview was administered first, together with the

Intake General Information Sheet (IGIS). A time-line with named anchors was created during the

interview, in order to identify present and past depressive episodes (with onset and offset dates as

punctual as possible) and to document the occurrence of any of a range of significant life events.

The anchors consisted of both general and personal events.

If the child had met DSM criteria for mood disorder at the first evaluation, the full semi-

structured diagnostic interview and a completion with additional self-rated scales were

administered. Not only the child was interviewed about him/herself, but also the parent about the

child. Pairs of senior child psychiatrists, trained as Best Estimate Diagnosticians (BEDs),

separately reviewed all material, and then together derived consensus diagnoses and decided

whether the child entered the “Proband” status.

Page 22: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

22

2.1.1. Study 1. Investigating the oxytocin or prolactin gene variants

In the investigation of oxytocin or prolactin gene variants, we included 678 families (Figure 3)

with at least one biological parent and a proband in the statistical analyses. In Study 1, there were

855 affected participants - probands (n = 678) and affected siblings (n = 177) met DSM-IV

criteria for either unipolar depression (n = 838) prior to age 14 years or bipolar disorder (n = 17)

prior to age 17 years. The mean proband age at study entry was 12.6 years [S.D. 2.32 years].

Probands were 55% male. Bipolar cases were included in the analyses since a significant

proportion of unipolar children will switch as they mature (Kovacs et al., 1997; Geller et al.,

2001) - less than 1% of the entire sample had a bipolar spectrum diagnosis at intake (Dempster et

al., 2007) -, and evidence that unipolar and bipolar illnesses share inherited risk (McGuffin et al.,

2003).

2.1.2. Preliminary studies testing the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depressed children

and their unaffected siblings

The aim of our preliminary study on the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism was to examine the

relationship between the polymorphism and childhood-onset depression, additionally,

melancholy as an alternative phenotype, the somato-vegetative symptoms as phenotypic

characteristics and stress related life events as environmental factors. Ninety-five depressive

patients and their 100 healthy siblings without psychiatric history above 18 years of age were

involved in this study. Probands were 50,5% and siblings were 48% male. The average age of

the probands from this first sample was 11,35±1,8 years and that of the siblings was 18,4±1,3

years. Depressive episodes and symptoms were examined with semi-structured interview (ISCA-

D). Melancholic phenotype was separated on the basis of the additional question of ISCA-D

referring to the different quality of depressed mood.

Extending our analysis, we compared 210 depressed (Figure 3) probands and their 100

unaffected siblings. Therefore, our largest case number regarding the preliminary studies is 210.

Screening of probands was performed from 01.11.1999. to 01.07.2005, and siblings from

01.11.1999 to 31.05.2008. Distribution of probands by gender and age was 116 males (55.2%),

mean age: 13.08 ±2.3 years.

Page 23: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

23

In this study we defined subgroups within depression according to the presence of melancholic

symptom on the basis of an item of the diagnostic interview referring to the distinct quality of

depressed mood. (This feeling of sadness since … is/was this different than the feeling you get

when a friend moves away? Is/was this like a ‘missing feeling’ or a ‘lonely feeling? How is it

different? Is it like being in a dark cave? Has anyone close to you died? A pet? Can you

remember how you felt then? How is/was your feeling now? Did you feel any different? In

what way…?). Ratings were obtained for both current and past symptoms. The distribution of

melancholic and non-melancholic phenotypes between the depressed group was the following:

24 (11.4%) participants currently melancholic, 16 (7.7%) with a past melancholic depressive

episode and 4 (1.9%) both current and past melancholy.

Siblings of child probands were subjected to the same research screening procedure and in case

of positive screening, to the same comprehensive diagnostic assessment procedure, detailed

above. Both probands and siblings were followed up by a yearly mail-follow-up test package

(MFU), including: a) parental report of interim medical and psychosocial events (short version of

our IGIS = SR-GIS) and a 26-item DSM depressive symptom checklist (DSC) and b) each

child’s self-rated depression scale (short CDI). In case of positive screening, a diagnostic

assessment procedure followed. All the siblings who haven’t screened positive on the follow-up

package before 18 years of age, were invited for assessment. 100 siblings over 18 years of age

were involved in the study as controls (48 males (48%), mean age: 18,04±1,3 years), whose

assessment procedure excluded the existence of current as well as lifetime episode of major

depression or any other major psychiatric morbidity.

2.1.3. Study 2. Investigating the melancholic and the nonmelancholic depressed groups

Studying the BDNF Val66MET polymorphism on an even larger sample, the depressed group

was divided into two groups on the basis of an improved classification method investigating the

presence of the melancholic subtype. From the COMD study sample 583 depressed probands

were included in Study 2 (Figure 3). Melancholic subtype of depression was estimated by ISCA-

D, on the basis of the criteria for melancholic features of the DSM-IV. The differentiating

symptoms were pervasive, nonreactive anhedonia, distinct quality of depressed mood, depression

worse in the morning, early morning awakening, marked psychomotor retardation or agitation,

Page 24: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

24

anorexia, weight loss and excessive and inappropriate guilt. 135 subjects met criteria for

melancholic depression in the current time-frame, and 44 subjects had such features during a past

episode. There were overlaps between the two groups given that some subjects had melancholy

in both time frames. Thus, 162 subjects met criteria for melancholic depression in at least one

time frame. The mean age of depressed subjects at first interview was 11.72 (SD=2.01) years.

The melancholic group (N=162) had a mean age of 11.71 (SD=2.01) and the non-melancholic

group (N=421) had a mean age of 11.76 (SD=2.01). The distribution by gender was 55.6% male

(n=324) in the total depressed group, 46.9% male (n=76) in the melancholic group and 58.9%

male (n=248) in the non-melancholic group (see Table 2 for further details).

Table 2. Characteristics of the total depressed group and the melancholic and nonmelancholic patients

Depressed group 2 (n=583) MEL (n=162) NMEL (n=421)

Age of onset (years) 11.7±2.0 11.7±2.0 11.7±2.0

Male/female 324/259 76/86 248/173

SLE (mean±SD) 6.07±2.86 5.84±3.03 6.15±2.78

MEL, melancholic; NMEL, nonmelancholic; SLE, stressful life event.

Life events were abstracted from a pre-coded demographic data sheet, the Intake General

Information Sheet (IGIS), completed by clinicians as part of the intake psychiatric interview,

using parents as informants. On the basis of the study of Mayer et al. (2009), 22 of the 26

stressful life events were separated into five clinically meaningful groups: “Parental health”,

“Death of close relatives”, “Sociodemographic” and “Intrafamilial”. Miscellaneous events

formed the fifth group containing items reflecting extrafamilial life events and abuse. A

continuous weighted total score reflecting the number of stressful life events was also computed

from the 26 items. Both the total and the grouped scores of stressful life event items were

weighted by age (age in years at the intake ISCA-D interview).

2.1.4. Study 3. Investigating the interferon-gamma +874 T/A polymorphism

100 Hungarian patients with childhood onset depression were involved in this study (55

probands in the sickness behaviour (SB) group and 45 probands in the comparison group)

(Figure 3). Diagnostic procedure included the above detailed Interview Schedule for Children

and Adolescents - Diagnostic Version, a semi- structured interview, based on DSM-IV. Covering

Page 25: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

25

the subject’s current episode and lifespan, we examined six somatic symptoms that characterize

sickness behaviour (SB) and depression, too (fatigue, altered sleep patterns, psychomotor

retardation, appetite loss, anhedonia and impaired cognitive function).

We did not examine social withdrawal, as it is not listed in the diagnostic symptoms of major

depressive disorder (according to DSM-IV).

In the presence of at least five of the somatic symptoms, that were frequent, considerable, and

noticeable and interfered with functioning, we categorized the subject into the SB group. We

compared this SB group with those depressed subjects who did not fulfil these criteria (-sb:

comparison group) (Table 3).

Table 3. Characteristics of the subgroups

Depressed group 3 Male (%) Female (%) Total Average age (year)

SB group 30 (54%) 25 (46%) 55 13.25±4.09

-sb group 25 (55%) 20 (45%) 45 13.68±5.17

2.2. Diagnostic tools and questionnaires

2.2.1. Intake General Information Sheet for Children and Adolescents (IGIS)

The IGIS is a fully structured interview containing pre-coded item response choices. In

the IGIS the parent is interviewed about the child’s socio-demographic/family background,

developmental, educational, and health history, and major life events at the intake in the

investigation.

2.2.2. Interview Schedule for Children and Adolescents – Diagnostic Version Present and

Lifetime (ISCA-D-PL)

Major depression was diagnosed using the ISCA-D-PL semi-structured psychiatric

interview, assessing both lifetime and current disorders in children and youths (Sherrill &

Kovacs, 2000). Furthermore, it includes most DSM-IV Axis-I diagnoses and even some DSM-III

symptoms. The clinicians rating is based on both the parent informants and the child’s/youth’s

answer, by deriving a final rating for each symptom. Although the ISCA-D is designed to

Page 26: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

26

provide information even on depression severity, this feature has not been used in the present

studies.

Melancholic subtype of depression was estimated by ISCA-D-PL, in case of having the DSM-IV

diagnosis of major depression, on the basis of the additional criteria for melancholic features of

the DSM-IV: Either of the following, occurring during the most severe period of the current

episode:

(1) loss of pleasure in all, or almost all activities

(2) lack of reactivity to usually pleasurable stimuli

Three (or more) of the following:

(1) distinct quality of depressed mood

(2) depression regularly worse in the morning

(3) early morning awakening (at least two hours before usual time before the awakening)

(4) marked psychomotor retardation or agitation

(5) significant anorexia or weight loss

(6) excessive or inappropriate guilt.

2.2.3. Children Depression Inventory-Short Version (CDI-Short Form)

As a part of the initial assessment, the 10-item CDI Short Form was developed. The CDI

in its original form is a 27-item self-rated questionnaire for children and adolescents. The Short

Form is a multi-rater assessment of depressive symptoms in youth aged 7 to 17 years correlating

with the full inventory (r=0,89), administered and scored using paper-and-pencil format in the

present study, providing streamline evaluation of depressive symptoms. Each item consists of

three choices, keyed 0 (absence of a symptom), 1 (mild symptom), 2 (definite symptom), with

higher scores indicating increasing severity. The total score can range from 0 to 20. The cut-off

value for clinical depression is 7 points (Mayer et al., 2006).

Page 27: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

27

2.3. Statistical analyses and laboratory methods

2.3.1. Statistical analyses

To study oxytocin and prolactin gene variants, several analyses were performed using Haploview

v 3.32 (Barrett et al., 2005), including Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and Mendelian inheritance,

and the transmission disequilibrium test (TDT). A corrected significance threshold was

calculated for each gene using Nyholt’s (2004) spectral decomposition (SNPSpD) method.

Correction by SNPSpD was followed by correction for the number of genes tested, to account for

multiple comparisons. Haplotype blocks were defined using the Gabriel et al. (2002) criteria. All

haplotypes with a frequency greater than 0.05 were also tested for association with COMD.

To compare melancholic depressed participants to the non-melancholic depressed ones, to

compare melancholic depressed participants to their unaffected siblings (with no detectable Axis

I DSM-IV disorder) and to compare probands with and without the somatic type of depression,

we applied the following statistical methods:

Data analysis was carried out using the software package SPSS Statistics, version 17 (SPSS Inc.,

Chicago, Illinois, USA). Group characteristics were investigated using an independent-samples t-

test and the χ2 -test. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare allele frequencies and the χ2 - test of

statistical significance set at p less than 0.05 was used to compare genotype frequencies among

the non-melancholic and melancholic subgroups, furthermore among melancholic probands and

their unaffected siblings. Logistic regression models were performed to examine the total

weighted and grouped weighted life event scores and BDNF Val66Met genotypes. We used these

models in the total melancholic group. Main effects and possible interactions were tested using

the likelihood ratio test (stepwise regression). In the first model (Model 1), the main effects of

the total weighted life event score and Val66Met genotypes were tested. Second, we included the

interaction term of total weighted life event scores and Val66Met genotypes. In the second

model (Model 2), the genotype and the main effects of grouped life events scores were tested,

later adding the interaction terms between grouped life event scores and Val66Met genotypes.

The main effects of SLEs were analysed continuously as continuous score yields more

information than dichotomous variables, yielding more sensitive results. Effect size was counted

for the genotype-by-melancholia interaction and power analysis was carried out using GPower

Page 28: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

28

(Faul et al., 2007). For the power calculation of the logistic regression analysis, the POWER

procedure in SAS 9.4 was used.

2.3.2. Laboratory methods

To genotype single nucleotide polymorphisms across the OXT and PRL genes and their

receptors, genomic DNA was isolated from blood for each participant using a high-salt method

(Lahiri and Nurnberger, 1991). Four buccal swabs were also collected per individual for quality

control purposes including resolution or confirmation of Mendelian inconsistencies. SNPs were

selected for each of the four genes based on Caucasian linkage disequilibrium (LD) plots from

the International HapMap project database (www.hapmap.org) with a minimum minor allele

frequency (MAF) of 20% (Table 4). SNPs were genotyped independently using 50 ng DNA in a

standard Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) TaqMan® assay-on-demand reaction modified

for a 10 µl final volume. Amplified products were analysed on an AB 7500 Sequence Detection

System.

Page 29: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

29

Table 4. Oxytocin and prolactin system genetic marker information

Gene

SNP

Chromosome

Position

Observed

heterozygosity

HWE

p-

value

%

Genotyped

Minor

allele

Minor

allele

frequency

OXT rs2740210 20p13 3001255 0.43 0.31 98 A 0.34

rs2770378 20p13 3001514 0.48 0.50 97 A 0.42

rs4813627 20p13 3003513 0.49 0.55 98 G 0.47

OXTR rs237885 3p25 8770543 0.49 0.11 100 T 0.44

rs2268493 3p25 8775840 0.43 0.32 96 C 0.32

rs237898 3p25 8783495 0.49 0.37 100 T 0.39

PRL rs1205961 6p22.3 22393991 0.45 1.00 100 A 0.35

rs1205960 6p22.3 22396139 0.37 0.46 95 T 0.25

rs849886 6p22.3 22399346 0.48 0.62 100 T 0.47

rs1341239 6p22.3 22412183 0.47 0.78 100 A 0.39

PRLR rs187490 5p13.2 35080884 0.41 0.21 100 C 0.31

rs249522 5p13.2 35096076 0.22 0.87 98 T 0.13

rs35614689 5p13.2 35134877 0.51 0.71 95 G 0.48

rs4703505 5p13.2 35207778 0.40 0.74 92 A 0.27

rs2047740 5p13.2 35239149 0.43 0.30 100 C 0.33

rs7727306 5p13.2 35273617 0.48 0.45 100 A 0.40

In our preliminary studies on the BDNF rs6265 single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA was

isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes and/or buccal swab. Genetic analysis: PCR, PmaCI

restriction enzyme digestion, followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with ethidium

bromide staining (Tsai et al., 2003). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software.

On the sample of depressed probands in Study 2, the BDNF rs6265 single nucleotide

polymorphism, also known as Val66Met, was genotyped using the Applied Biosystems TaqMan

pre-designed assay C_11592758_10 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). For

Page 30: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

each reaction, 20 ng genomic DNA was amplified as per

volume of 10 µl in an MJ Research thermocycler (Bio

USA). Each genotyping plate was

Sequence Detection System (software

were made manually.

Genotyping of the IFNγ +874 T/A single nucleotide polymorphism has been carried out by allele

specific PCR amplifications, followed by polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis an

ethidium bromide (DNA was isolated from blood sample or buccal swab).

samples in the electrophoresis gel, a photo of the resulting pattern was taken (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Representative gel picture of IFNproducer) genotype; Lane C & D: AT (medium producer) genotype; Lane

30

each reaction, 20 ng genomic DNA was amplified as per the manufacturer’s dire

l in an MJ Research thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California,

USA). Each genotyping plate was analysed after amplification on the ABI Prism 7000 AQ5

Sequence Detection System (software v1.2.3) using the allelic discrimination option. Allele calls

+874 T/A single nucleotide polymorphism has been carried out by allele

specific PCR amplifications, followed by polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis an

ethidium bromide (DNA was isolated from blood sample or buccal swab).

samples in the electrophoresis gel, a photo of the resulting pattern was taken (Figure 4).

resentative gel picture of IFN-ɤ +874 T/A polymorphism. M, Marker;

: AT (medium producer) genotype; Lane E & F: TT (high producer)

the manufacturer’s directions in a total

Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California,

after amplification on the ABI Prism 7000 AQ5

v1.2.3) using the allelic discrimination option. Allele calls

+874 T/A single nucleotide polymorphism has been carried out by allele

specific PCR amplifications, followed by polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by

ethidium bromide (DNA was isolated from blood sample or buccal swab). After migration of the

samples in the electrophoresis gel, a photo of the resulting pattern was taken (Figure 4).

M, Marker; Lane A & B: AA (low : TT (high producer)

Page 31: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

31

3. Results

3.1. Investigating the OXT, OXTR, PRL, and PRLR genes in child and youth depression

A total of 678 families were genotyped for 16 SNPs across the OXT, OXTR, PRL, and PRLR

genes. All SNPs were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p ≥ 0.11). Seventeen families showed

Mendelian errors. In 11 of these, inconsistencies were not due to sample handling errors,

according to evaluation of buccal swabs taken from the same individual as the blood sample;

these families were suspected of nongenetic familial relationships and removed from the

analysis. The remaining six families with Mendelian errors showed a discrepancy between the

blood and buccal swab samples for one member of the family. In the latter cases, the swab

sample was used to genotype the discrepant individual. DNA from blood was used to regenotype

5% of the samples at each marker: error rates were < 1% and were explained by

labelling/transcriptional errors.

Two of the three SNPs of the OXT gene, showed significant results (rs2740210: allele C

overtransmitted, χ² = 5.32, p = 0.02; rs4813627: allele G overtransmitted, χ² = 6.01, p = 0.01; see

Table 4). After using SNPSpD, both were nominally significant (Meff = 2.35, adjusted α =

0.021), but they were not significant after further Bonferroni correction by the number of genes

tested (adjusted α = 0.005). No significant associations were found for any SNPs in the OXTR,

PRL, or PRLR genes (p > 0.15 (Table 5). Only one haplotype block, spanning rs1205960 and

rs849886 in the PRL gene, was identified. None of the haplotypes were significant.

Page 32: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

32

Table 5. Transmission disequilibrium test results for OXT, OXTR, PRL and PRLR markers

Gene SNP Overtransmitted

allele

Tr:Un x2 p

OXT rs2740210 C 260:210 5.32 0.02¹

rs2770378 G 271:238 2.14 0.14

rs4813627 G 299:242 6.01 0.01¹

OXTR rs237898 A 278:269 0.15 0.70

rs2268493 A 229:220 0.18 0.67

rs237885 A 270:263 0.09 0.76

PRL rs1341239 T 277:246 1.84 0.18

rs849886 G 297:268 1.49 0.22

rs1205960 G 198:193 0.06 0.80

rs1205961 T 268:229 3.06 0.08

PRLR rs7727306 A 282:279 0.02 0.90

rs2047740 C 259:225 2.39 0.12

rs4703505 T 184:162 1.40 0.24

rs35614689 T 272:253 0.69 0.41

rs249522 G 136:121 0.88 0.35

rs187490 T 242:230 0.31 0.58

Tr: transmitted; Un: untransmitted.

¹Not significant at adjusted α = 0.005.

We performed two additional exploratory analyses to examine parent-of-origin effects (POEs)

and proband sex effects for the three SNPs downstream of the OXT gene, using the default

TDTPHASE sub-option settings of UNPHASED v2.403 (Dudbridge, 2003), followed by a

onetailed Fisher’s Exact text, based on the hypothesis that oestrogen influences on OXT

expression would be more relevant in transmissions to and from females. Three OXT SNPs

revealed biased maternal transmissions of rs2740210 (allele A undertransmitted, relative risk

(RR) = 0.68, CI = 0.46-1.03, likelihood ratio score (LRS) = 7.14, p = 0.007) and rs4813627

(allele A undertransmitted, RR = 0.71, CI = 0.49-1.04, LRS = 6.09, p = 0.01), while paternal

transmissions were not significant; most of the paternal transmissions were in the same direction

Page 33: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

33

as the maternal transmissions, with no parent-of-origin effect by Fisher’s Exact Test (p’s ≥ 0.12).

Similarly, all three OXT SNPs showed biased transmission to daughters, but proband sex effects

were not significant after correction for multiple tests (adjusted α = 0.017) for rs2740210 (FET, p

= 0.04) or rs2770378 (FET, p = 0.02) (Table 6).

Table 6. OXT SNP transmissions according to the sex of the parent and proband

SNP

Paternal transmissions

Maternal transmissions

FET (one-

tailed)

Tr Un RR LRS p Tr Un RR LRS p

rs2740210 108 95 0.88 0.83 0.36 115 78 0.68 7.14 0.007 0.12

rs2770378 104 100 0.96 0.08 0.78 115 90 0.78 3.06 0.08 0.17

rs4813627 111 88 0.79 2.66 0.1 125 89 0.71 6.09 0.01 0.32

SNP

Transmissions to male probands

Transmissions to female probands

FET (one-

tailed)

Tr Un RR LRS p Tr Un RR LRS p

rs2740210 135 128 0.95 0.19 0.66 133 90 0.68 8.34 0.004 0.04

rs2770378 145 152 1.05 0.16 0.68 132 96 0.73 5.71 0.02 0.02

rs4813627 170 151 0.89 1.12 0.29 138 98 0.71 6.81 0.01 0.11

Tr: transmitted; Un: untransmitted; RR: relative risk; LRS: likelihood ratio test statistic; FET: Fisher’s Exact test, one-tailed p-value (adjusted α = 0.017).

Page 34: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

34

3.2. The preliminary studies investigating the role of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in childhood onset depression

We did not find significant difference in the frequency of BDNF genotypes (p=0.511) and alleles

(Figure 5 and 6) between the depressed and the healthy sibling control groups.

Regarding the melancholic phenotype, BDNF Val66Val genotype had a significantly higher

frequency in the depressed group than in the unaffected siblings (p=0.024).

We did not find significant difference in the frequency of BDNF alleles between the melancholic

and the non-melancholic group.

From the investigated somato-vegetative symptoms (poor concentration, memory or attention,

insomnia, hypersomnia, weight loss or weight gain, psychomotor retardation or agitation)

hypersomnia showed association with the frequency of Val66Met genotype (p < 0.1).

Regarding the categorized life event groups the occurrence of psychiatric disease of family

members showed association with BDNF Val allele.

Figure 5. BDNF Val66Met genotype distribution between depressed children and their healthy siblings as controls

Figure 6. BDNF Val66Met allele distribution between depressed children and their healthy siblings as controls DNF Val66Met genotype distribution

Page 35: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

35

In the extended preliminary study, the melancholic subgroup of depressed probands did not show

significantly higher Val/Val frequency than the unaffected control group (p = 0.28 and 0.37,

respectively). The Val allele was not associated with the occurrence of melancholic subtype in

depressive probands (p = 0.12 and 0.29) (see the Table 7 below).

Table 7. Genotype and allele distributions in melancholic probands and their unaffected siblings

Unaffected (n=100) Melancholic subtype (n=24)

Current

Melancholic subtype (n=16)

Past

Genotype* ***

Met/Met 5 (5%) 1 (4.2%) -

Val/Met 29 (29%) 11 (45.8%) 7 (43.8%)

Val/Val 66 (66%) 12 (50%) 9 (56.2%)

Allele** ****

Val 95 23 16

Met 34 12 7

* melancholic current vs. unaffected χ² = 2.52 p = 0.28

** melancholic current vs.unaffected χ²=2.47 pVal = 0.12 and χ² = 0.32 pMet = 0.57

*** melancholic past vs. unaffected χ² = 1.97 p = 0.37

**** melancholic past vs. unaffected χ² = 1.1 pVal = 0.29 and χ² = 1.7 pMet = 0.28

3.3. BDNF Val66Met genotype and allele distributions in melancholic and non-melancholic depressed participants and examining whether the past exposure to SLEs interacts with BDNF to predict the melancholic subtype

In this sample of depressed youths, 27.78% fulfilled the criteria for melancholic depression. The

mean age at interview did not differ significantly between the melancholic and the

nonmelancholic subgroups [t = − 0.28, p (two-tailed) = 0.78], whereas there was a statistically

significant difference [t = − 0.262, p (two-tailed) = 0.01] in sex. Further characteristics of the

total sample and the subsamples can be found in Table 6 (here we provided an unweighted sum

of life events).

Comparison of the total and grouped SLE scores did not show any significant difference between

the two patient groups. A nonsignificant difference [t = 1.759, df. = 1, p = 0.079] was found in

the intrafamilial SLE scores (M = 17.33 in the nonmelancholic and 15.62 in the melancholic

Page 36: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

36

group, respectively). Table 8 shows the frequency of each life event and the life event grouping,

together with the relative p - values.

Table 8. Frequency of stressful life events in the melancholic and non-melancholic groups and the p-values of the independent sample t-statistics testing the differences of the SLE scores between those with and without melancholy

Life event groups Frequency in the

melancholic group

(N=162)

Frequency in the non-

melancholic group

(N=421)

N % N % p-value

Parental health events

1. Medical hospitalization of biological mother

due to somatic illness

49 30.2 155 36.8 0.59

2. Medical hospitalization of biological father 43 26.9 116 27.6

3. Medical. hospitalization of stepparent 5

3.1 8 1.9

4. Physical illness of biological mother 16 9.9 46 10.9

5. Physical illness of biological father 18 11.2 33 7.8

6. Physical illness of stepparent 0 0.0 1 0.2

7. Psychiatric hospitalization of biological mother 31 19.1 63 15

8. Psychiatric hospitalization of biological father 22 13.7 57 13.5

9. Psychiatric hospitalization of stepparent 0 0.0 6 1.4

Death of Close Relatives Events

10. Death of a parent 10 6.2 17 4.0 0.63

11. Death of a close relative 107 66.0 286 67.9

Sociodemographic Events

12. Financial problem 40 24.7 134 31.8 0.40

13. Move 92 56.8 222 52.7

14. Parent unemployed 73 45.3 203 48.2

15. Natural disaster 4 2.5 13 3.1

16. Loss of home 5 3.1 17 4

Page 37: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

37

Intra-familial Events

17. Sibling birth 102 63.0 275 65.3 0.079

18. Sibling medical hospitalization 36 22.5 139 33.0

19. Sibling psychiatric hospitalization 12 7.4 33 7.8

20. Family arguments 78 48.1 225 53.4

21. Foster-care of subject 0 0.0 4 1

22. Divorce of biological parents 61 37.7 160 38.0

Extrafamilial Events and Abuse

23. Abuse 44 27.2 114 27.1 0.92

24. Teasing by peers 88 54.3 230 54.6

25. Police contact 6 3.7 19 4.5

26. Suspension from school 3 1.9 7 1.7

Grouping is based on the study of Mayer et al. (2009) Ref. 24

SLE, stressful life event

In both melancholic and nonmelancholic depressed groups, the homozygous Val/Val genotype

had the highest occurrence. The homozygous Met/Met genotype was the least common in both

groups. Table 9 shows the genotype and allele frequencies in the total depressed group and the

subgroups. The genotypes were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, both in the total depressed

group and in the subgroups.

Table 9. BDNF genotype distributions and allele frequencies in the melancholic and non-melancholic subgroups

Depressed (N=583) MEL (N=162) NMEL (N=421)

Genotype [n (%)]

Met/Met 18 (3.1) 4 (2.5) 14 (3.3)

Val/Met 167 (28.6) 39 (24.1) 128 (30.4)

Val/Val 398 (68.3) 119 (73.5) 279 (66.3)

Allele [n (%)]

Val 963 (82.6) 277 (85.5) 686 (81.5)

Met 203 (17.4) 47 (14.5) 156 (18.5)

BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; MEL: Melancholic (either current or past); NMEL: Non-melancholic depressed

Testing our first hypothesis, the allele frequency was not significantly different across the two

diagnostic groups (Fisher’s exact: p = 0.121). The Val/Val genotype frequency did not differ

Page 38: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

38

significantly (χ2 = 2.80, df. = 2, p = 0.25) between the melancholic and the nonmelancholic

group. Because of the low rate of the Met/Met genotype, genotypes were dichotomized on the

basis of the presence of the Met allele. There was a trend among the nonmelancholic depressed

youth of showing a slightly higher rate of the Met-containing genotype, although not statistically

significant (Fisher’s exact: p = 0.112). The effect size (W) for our genotype-by-melancholia

interaction was 0.12; power on such an effect size with 2 df. was 0.74. Examining our second

hypothesis, in the total melancholic group with the Model 1 of the logistic regression, described

in the Statistical analysis section, taking Met containing genotypes as the reference category, we

did not find either significant main effect or significant interaction effect of the total SLEs and

the BDNF polymorphism on the melancholy outcome. When we applied Model 2 (again the

Met-containing genotype was considered the reference category) to examine life event groups

separately, neither of the events contributed significantly toward the model. Main effects and

interactions of BDNF Met-containing genotypes, total SLEs, and SLE groups as predictors in the

model of melancholic depression are shown in Table 10. For the logistic regression analysis,

power was 0.31 for life events, 0.56 for the presence of a Met allele, and 0.06 for the life events-

by-genotype interaction.

Page 39: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

39

Table 10. Main effects and interactions of BDNF Met-containing genotypes, total stressful life events, and stressful life event groups as predictors in the model of melancholic depression in males and females

Dependent variable Models Independent variables OR p value

Melancholy (Females) Model 1

Met-containing genotypes - .0789

Total stressful life events - .733

Met-containing genotypes × Total stressful life events - .385

Model 2 Met-containing genotypes - .391

Parental health - .893

Death of close relatives - .187

Sociodemographic - .631

Intrafamilial - .111

Extrafamilial and Abuse - .871

Met-containing genotypes ×

Parental health -

.901

Met-containing genotypes ×

Death of close relatives -

.894

Met-containing genotypes × Sociodemographic - .573

Met-containing genotypes × Intrafamilial - .126

Met-containing genotypes × Extrafamilial and Abuse 1.05 .021

Melancholy (Males)

Model 1

Met-containing genotypes - .073

Total stressful life events - .109

Met-containing genotypes ×

Total stressful life events -

.990

Model 2 Met-containing genotypes - .073

Parental health - .485

Death of close relatives - .074

Sociodemographic - .485

Intrafamilial - .195

Extrafamilial and Abuse - .419

Met-containing genotypes ×

Parental health -

.995

Met-containing genotypes ×

Death of close relatives -

.964

Met-containing genotypes × Sociodemographic - .888

Met-containing genotypes × Intrafamilial - .706

Met-containing genotypes × Extrafamilial and Abuse - .356

BDNF, brain-derived neurotrophic factor; OR, odds ratio

Page 40: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

40

3.4. Investigating the association between interferon gamma +874 T/A polymorphism and the somatic type of depression

In the sickness behaviour (SB) group, the frequencies of the A allele containing genotypes were

higher, than in the comparison group, without statistically significant difference (Figure 7) (T/A:

SB group: 60.0%, -sb group: 51.1%; A/A: SB group: 21.8%, -sb group: 13.3%; p = 0.122).

Figure 7. Genotype distribution in probands with and without sickness behaviour SB, sickness behaviour; -sb, comparison group The comparison of allele frequencies also did not reveal statistically significant differences (T:

SB group: 48.2%, -sb group: 61.1%; A: SB group: 51.8%, -sb group: 38.9%; p > 0.1) (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Allele distribution in probands with and without sickness behaviour

SB, sickness behaviour; -sb, comparison group

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

SB -sb

T/T

A/A

T/A

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

SB -sb

T

A

Page 41: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

41

These results did not reveal association between IFN-γ +874 polymorphism and SB. However

we observed a tendency, being the genotypes with the A allele more frequent in the SB group.

4. Discussion

Our research is performed in a very large clinical sample of children and adolescents with

MDD, even involving their siblings who are affected or not affected by the disorder, as controls.

Overall, our results complement a growing body of literature, which suggests that MDD is

caused by numerous interacting genetic and non-genetic factors. Even today, gene variants

associated with MDD vulnerability have not been clearly identified (Lopizzo et al., 2015).

We genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms across the OXT and PRL genes and their

receptors in a large Hungarian cohort of families with COMD. Our results show a trend towards

association of two OXT SNPs, rs2740210 and rs4813627, with COMD, not significant after

correction for multiple testing. Supplementary analyses initially suggested proband sex effects

for OXT SNPs rs2740210 and rs2770378, but were not significant after multiple testing

corrections. OXT lies in a segmental duplication region of human chromosome 20 and shares

high sequence homology in the first two exons to the arginine vasopressin (AVP) gene. The OXT

and AVP genes lie tail-to-tail and are separated by a 10 kb intergenic region (IGR); AVP and

vasopressin V1b receptor gene ( (AVPR1B) genetic polymorphisms have both been significantly

associated with COMD in this sample (Dempster et al., 2007, 2009). The three OXT SNPs

genotyped in the present study reside within 2 kb of the 3’ end of the OXT gene. Transgenic rat

and mouse studies of the OXT and AVP genes have shown that the IGR contains regulatory

sequences responsible for cell-specific OXT expression in oxytocinergic magnocellular neurons

(MCNs) (Murphy and Wells, 2003). The observation that the two OXT SNPs showed a

nonsignificant trend for affected daughters, is of note in light of OXT sex effects reported in the

literature (Richard and Zingg, 1990; Cushing and Carter, 2000). To our knowledge, this is the

first genetic association study of OXT and PRL variants in a pediatric mood disorder sample.

Four studies have found associations between OXTR gene variations and autism (Wu et al., 2005;

Ylisaukko-oja et al., 2005; Jacob et al., 2007; Gregory et al., 2009) and recent evidence has

implicated the OXTR in maternal sensitive responsiveness with their 2-year-old toddlers

Page 42: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

42

(Bakermans Kranenburg and van Ijzendoorn, 2008). A haplotype of three OXTR SNPs that we

did not examine has recently been associated with negative affect and loneliness (Lucht et al.,

2009). Another investigation noted an association between two OXTR SNPs and major

depression (Costa et al., 2009); we studied three different loci and provided broader SNP

coverage of the OXTR, with a childhood-onset sample. There were more missing fathers than

missing mothers in our sample. We did not estimate missing parental genotypes. Since a missing

parental genotype means the entire family is excluded from the analysis, the relatively larger

number of missing fathers will reduce our power, but not influence the relative numbers of

parental transmissions tested. We studied a moderately large, well-characterized sample.

Statistical methods used were robust to population stratification. Corrections for multiple tests

were conservative. We estimate 678 families provide a power of 0.86, given the assumptions of a

α=0.05, population frequency of 2%, additive model of inheritance, genotype relative risk of 1.4,

minor allele frequency of 0.41 (mean minor allele frequency for OXT SNPs = 0.41) and complete

linkage between risk and disease variants (Purcell et al., 2003). We report evidence that was

initially suggestive of possible association between two OXT SNPs (rs2740210 and rs4813627)

and COMD. The results survived spectral decomposition, but were not significant after

correcting for the number of genes tested. OXTR, PRL and PRLR SNPs were not associated with

COMD. In secondary analyses, the relative significances of association for two OXT SNPs were

increased with parental and proband sex effect analyses. A trend towards proband sex effects to

daughters failed to reach statistical significance after correcting for multiple tests. Considering

the OXT SNPs are located in a putative regulatory region, our exploratory analyses by parent and

proband sex are of interest as they may be relevant to epigenetic effects (Kaminsky et al., 2006).

Our second study completes the investigation of the genetic background of depression

using alternative phenotypes. We were particularly interested in finding subtypes/alternative

phenotypes of depression, as well as finding a trait marker for major depression, because such

factors could be helpful in finding susceptibility genes. Given that MDD as defined by the DSM-

IV is a complex disorder, finding susceptibility genes may be facilitated using alternative, more

homogenous depression phenotypes. However, even factors other than genetic vulnerability and

diagnostic procedure must be considered to explain the development of MDD (Hosang et al.,

2014). Despite the clinical utility and validity of the melancholic phenotype of depression, a

Page 43: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

43

debate has been ongoing on the relevance of the subtype, suggesting that further research is

needed (Hadzi-Pavlovic and Boyce, 2012) to define its biological features. After that the results

of our preliminary study showed that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism might play a role in

the onset of melancholic type of depression, we decided to perform the analyses on a larger

database and with improved criteria for melancholic depression.

Consequently, we studied the contribution of the BDNF polymorphism and its

interaction with SLE toward early onset melancholic depression. The frequency of melancholia

in our sample was in the range of the previously reported prevalences of 20% to almost 50% in

juvenile samples (Ryan et al., 1987; Kolvin et al., 1991; Ambrosini et al., 2002). The ratio of

females was significantly higher in the melancholic than in the non-melancholic group [t =

−0.262, p (two-tailed) = 0.01], suggesting that females are more prone to developing the early-

onset melancholic phenotype. The current literature establishes that girls show more depressive

symptoms than boys (Wade et al., 2002; Hankin et al., 2007); however, there is some

inconsistency in the findings (Chen et al., 2012), which may be because of methodological, age,

and ethnic differences in the sample populations. Although in a preliminary study of Quinn et al.

(2012) and in the study of Guo et al. (2015), no significant differences were found in the

melancholic, non-melancholic, and control groups for sex or age, the difference compared with

our findings may be because of their focus on the adult population in addition to a smaller

sample size, which decreases the chances of finding a significant difference. Our result may

represent an interesting suggestion for future research as the presence of the subtype might

influence treatment response (Rush et al., 2008) and complications. According to a study of Gold

et al. (2002), common medical complications of different subtypes of depression may occur

because of different underlying mechanisms. In the genotypic and allelic association analysis, we

found elevated Val/Val genotype frequency in the melancholic group. Our analysis, however,

could not be used to discriminate between the melancholic and the non-melancholic groups. The

calculated effect size and the power analysis carried out for our genotype-by-melancholia

interaction suggests that small to medium effects would have been detected if present. Our

results partly correlate with the study of Quinn et al. (2012), showing that no significant

relationship was found between the BDNF genotype and groups. However, they found that the

gene-by-environment interaction effect is expected to provide a better prediction for melancholic

depression. The explanation for the different but not contradictory results is that we examined

Page 44: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

44

biological features discriminating the melancholic versus the non-melancholic phenotype within

a depressed sample, whereas Quinn et al. (2012) compared the melancholic and the non-

melancholic group of patients with healthy controls. Power analysis for the logistic regression

analysis suggests that our sample was adequate to detect the main effects of life events or

genotype if they were medium to large, but could only detect interaction effects if they were

quite large.

In our third study we investigated the (+874) T/A genotypes given the information that

they have previously been studied in connection with the risk of IFN-alpha-induced depression,

the presence of T alleles representing a risk for the development of this disease (Oxenkrug et al.,

2014). Our case control study investigating directly the role of interferon-γ, performed on a well-

defined subgroup of depressed children, however, did not reveal any significant difference in the

genotype or allele distribution between subjects with the somatic type of depression and the

comparison group. We observed a tendency that failed to attain significance at conventional

level, being the genotypes with the A allele more frequent in the SB group. Further investigation

may thus be needed with an increased number of subjects.

Since the underlying genetics has proved to be highly complex, identifying the genetic

determinants for individual differences in the susceptibility to MDD is amongst the greatest

challenges.

An illustrative example on the complexity of the genetic background of depression is

given by that interferon treatment may modulate 5-HTT activity levels (Morikawa et al., 1998).

A repeat length polymorphism in the promoter region of this gene has been shown to affect the

rate of serotonin uptake and may play a role in depression-susceptibility. In human placental

choriocarcinoma cells, a 3-hour treatment with IFN-γ increased levels of 5-HTT mRNA and a

treatment with IFN-γ for 3-6 hours also increased 5-HTT uptake activity. These data suggest that

IFN-induced psychiatric effects may be modulated by regulation of 5-HTT transcription.

The power and performance of the methods trying to determine the molecular genetic

background of depression may be further improved by integrating biological information at the

systemic level. To overcome the limitations of the case control approaches, sets of the genes

carrying out biochemical processes related to the functioning of neural systems can be

investigated in the future.

Page 45: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

45

Strengths and Limitations

Although the sample size would ideally be larger, the above described studies have

several methodological strengths. We note that our melancholic group is a well-defined subgroup

within the depressed patients thanks to the diagnoses established through a very rigorous

procedure, described in the materials and methods section, using clinician administered semi-

structured interviews to obtain the optimal collection of biographical and contextual information.

Life events were measured by researcher administered questionnaires. The present study on

oxytocin and prolactin genes is the first genetic analysis to examine the association between

variants in these neuroendocrine genes and depression with onset in childhood. Furthermore, to

our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the differentiating effect of the BDNF

genotype and the G×E interaction on the melancholic phenotype in a large sample of depressed

young patients, which was representative of the Hungarian population.

As the parents were providing information on their children’s SLEs, we had limited

information on some of them, for example teasing. Though face-to-face interviews by clinically

trained assessors, the use of common phrases, and the use of timelines with named “anchors”

during the interview may facilitate retrospective recall (Buka et al., 2004).

Given the complexity of Model 2 investigating the interaction of stressful life events with

the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism, the particular model would only be able to detect large

effects, which represents a limitation of our study.

Page 46: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

46

Conclusions

We found no association between oxytocin and prolactin gene variants and childhood-

onset mood disorders. The performed exploratory analyses by parent and proband sex are of

interest as they may be relevant to epigenetic effects. We didn’t find association between the

melancholic subtype of major depression and the BDNF genotype and stressful life event

interaction and the somatic subtype of childhood-onset major depression and the interferon-

gamma +874 T/A polymorphism in this clinic-referred population of depressed youths.

In our study, females are more prone to develop the early-onset melancholic phenotype.

This results contributes to the prevention and treatment of the melancholic type of childhood-

onset major depression, as consequences can be lessened by focusing on risk groups in early

stages. However, additional research and empirical work is needed in this area to further

understand the contribution of the early-onset phenotype.

Page 47: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

47

Acknowledgements

The financial supports of the National Institute of Mental Health by Program Project # P01

MH056193, MH084938 HHS, Washington, DC and a SickKids Foundation-CIHR New

Investigator Grant are gratefully acknowledged. Members of the International Consortium for

Childhood-Onset Mood Disorders. Heads of the Units and Departments where the patients were

collected, and collaborators. I would like to sincerely acknowledge my gratitude to my

supervisors Ágnes Vetró and Krisztina Kapornai, for their guidance and support throughout the

research work. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Maria Kovacs for the continuous

support of my Ph.D. study and related research. I would also like to thank Anna Juhász, Ágnes

Fehér, Enikő Kiss, Ildikó Baji and István Benák for their fruitful collaboration. I would like to

thank all my colleagues at Szeged University Medical Faculty, Department of Child and

Adolescent Psychiatry, Szeged. I would like to thank Fabrizio for believing in me and being by

my side throughout this time. I would also like to thank my family for always being supportive

and encouraging.

Tímea Szeged, 2016

Page 48: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

48

References

Ambrosini, PJ, Bennett, DS, Cleland, CM, Haslam, N. (2002). Taxonicity of adolescent

melancholia: A categorical or dimensional construct. J Psychiat Res 36, 247-256.

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1987). Diagnostic and Statistical manual of mental

disorders, 3rd ed. Washington DC: APA.

American Psychiatric Association (APA). (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental

disorders, 4th ed. Washington DC: APA.

Amico, JA, Mantella, RC, Vollmer, RR, Li, X. (2004). Anxiety and stress responses in female

oxytocin deficient mice. J. Neuroendocrinol 16, 319-324.

Anderson, IM, Ware, CJ, da Roza Davis, JM, Cowen, PJ. (1992). Decreased 5-HT-mediated

prolactin release in major depression. Br. J. Psychiatry 160, 372-378.

Bakermans-Kranenburg, MJ, van Ijzendoorn, MH. (2008). Oxytocin receptor (OXTR) and

serotonin transporter (5-HTT) genes associated with observed parenting. Soc Cogn Affect

Neurosci 3, 128-134.

Barrett, JC, Fry, B, Maller, J, Daly, MJ. (2005). Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and

haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263-265.

Bell, CJ, Nicholson, H, Mulder, RT, Luty, SE, Joyce, PR. (2006). Plasma oxytocin levels in

depression and their correlation with the temperament dimension of reward dependence. J.

Psychopharmacol 20, 656-660.

Page 49: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

49

Bennabi, D, Vandel, P, Papaxanthis, C, Pozzo, T, Haffen, E. (2013). Psychomotor Retardation in

Depression: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic, Pathophysiologic, and Therapeutic

Implications. Biomed Res Int 2013, 158-746.

Bodnàr, I, Mravek, B, Kubovcakova, L, Fekete, MI, Nagy, GM, Kvetnansky, R. (2004).

Immobilization stress-induced increase in plasma catecholamine levels is inhibited by a

prolactoliberin (salsolinol) administration. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1018, 124-130.

Bosker, FJ, Hartman, CA, Nolte, IM, et al. (2011). Poor replication of candidate genes for major

depressive disorder using genome-wide association data. Mol Psychiatry 16, 516–32.

Bouma, E, Ormel, J, Verhulst, F, Oldehinkel, A. (2008). Stressful life events and depressive

problems in early adolescent boys and girls: The influence of parental depression, temperament,

and family environment. J Affect Disord 105(1–3), 185–193.

Bracht, T, Horn, H, Strik, W, Federspiel, A, Schnell, S, Höfle, O, Stegmayer, K, Wiest, R,

Dierks, T, Müller, TJ, Walther, S. (2014). White matter microstructure alterations of the medial

forebrain bundle in melancholic depression. J Affect Disord 155, 186-93.

Brown, G. W, Craig, TKJ, Harris, TO, Herbert, J, Hodgson, K, Tansey, KE and Uher, R. (2014).

Functional polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene interacts with stressful

life events but not childhood maltreatment in the etiology of depression. Depress Anxiety 31,

326-334.

Brummett, BH, Boyle, SH, Kuhn, CM, Siegler, IC, Williams, RB. (2008). Associations among

central nervous system serotonergic function and neuroticism are moderated by gender. Biol

Psychol 78, 200-203.

Buka, SL, Goldstein, JM, Spartos, E, Tsuang, MT. (2004). The retrospective measurement of

prenatal and perinatal events: Accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophr Res. 71:417–426.

Page 50: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

50

Bukh, JD, Bock, C, Vinberg, M, Werge, T, Gether U, Vedel, Kessing, L. (2009). Interaction

between genetic polymorphisms and stressful life events in first episode depression. J Affect

Disord 119(1-3), 107-15.

Caspi, A, Sugden, K, Moffitt, TE, Taylor, A, Craig, IW, Harrington, H, McClay, J, Mill, J,

Martin, J, Braithwaite, A, Poulton, R. (2003). Influence of life stress on depression: moderation

by a

polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science 301, 386-389.

Cardoner, N, Soria, V, Gratacos, M, Hernandez-Ribas, R, Pujol, J, et al. (2013). Val66met

BDNF genotypes in melancholic depression: effects on brain structure and treatment outcome.

Depress Anxiety 30, 225–233.

Chen, L, Lawlor, DA, Lewis, SJ, Yuan, W, Abdollahi, MR, Timpson, NJ, Day, IN, Ebrahim, S,

Smith, GD, Shugart, YY. (2008). Genetic association study of BDNF in depression: Finding

from two cohort studies and a meta-analysis. Am J Med Genet (Neuropsychiatr Genet) 147, 814–

821.

Chen, J, Li, X, & McGue, M. (2012). Interacting effect of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and

stressful life events on adolescent depression. Genes, Brain and Behaviour 11, 958–965.

Chen J, Li X, McGue M. (2013). The interacting effect of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism

and stressful life events on adolescent depression is not an artifact of gene-environment

correlation: evidence from a longitudinal twin study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 54(10), 1066–

1073.

Costa, B, Pini, S, Gabelloni, P, Abelli, M, Lari, L, Cardini, A, et al. (2009). Oxytocin receptor

polymorphisms and adult attachment style in patients with depression.

Psychoneuroendocrinology

34, 1506-1514.

Page 51: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

51

Cuijpers P, Smit F. (2002) Excess mortality in depression: a meta-analysis of community studies.

J Affect Disord 72(3), 227–236.

Cushing, BS, Carter, CS. (2000). Peripheral pulses of oxytocin increase partner preferences in

female, but not male, prairie voles. Horm Behav 37, 49-56.

Cyranowski, JM, Hofkens, TL, Frank, E, Seltman, H, Cai, HM, Amico, JA. (2008). Evidence of

dysregulated peripheral oxytocin release among depressed women. Psychosom Med 70, 967-

975.

Dantchev, N, Widlöcher, DJ. (1998). The measurement of retardation in depression. J Clin

Psychiatry 59 Suppl 14, 19-25.

Dempster, EL, Burcescu, I, Wigg, K, Kiss, E, Baji, I, Gadoros, J, Tamàs, Z, Kapornai, K,

Daróczy, G, Kennedy, JL, et al. (2009). Further genetic evidence implicates the vasopressin

system in

childhood-onset mood disorders. Eur J Neurosci 30, 1615-1619.

Dempster, EL, Burcescu, I, Wigg, K, Kiss, E, Baji, I, Gadoros, J, Tamás, Z, Kennedy, JL, et al.

(2007). Evidence of an association between the vasopressin V1b receptor gene (AVPR1B) and

childhood-onset mood disorders. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 1189-1195.

Domes, G, Heinrichs, M, Glascher, J, Buchel, C, Braus, DF, Herpertz, SC. (2007). Oxytocin

attenuates amygdala responses to emotional faces regardless of valence. Biol Psychiatry 62,

1187-1190.

Domschke, K, Lawford, B, Laje, G, Berger, K, Young, R, Morris, P, Deckert, J, Arolt, V,

McMahon, FJ, Baune, BT. (2010). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor ( BDNF) gene: no major

impact on antidepressant treatment response. Int. J. Neuropsychop 13, 93-101.

Page 52: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

52

Drago, F, Pulvirenti, L, Spadaro, F, Pennisi, G. (1990). Effects of TRH and prolactin in the

behavioural despair (swim) model of depression in rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 15, 349-356.

Dudbridge, F. (2003). Pedigree disequilibrium tests for multilocus haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol

25, 115-121.

Ebmeier KP, Donaghey C, Steele JD. (2006). Recent developments and current controversies in

depression. Lancet 367(9505), 153–167.

Ebner, K, Bosch, OJ, Kromer, SA, Singewald, N, Neumann, ID. (2005). Release of oxytocin in

the rat central amygdala modulates stress-coping behaviour and the release of excitatory amino

acids. Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 223-230.

Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Bertolino A, et al. (2003). The

BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human

memory and hippocampal function. Cell 112, 257–269.

Eley, TC, Sugden, K, Corsico, A, Gregory, AM, Sham, P, McGuffin, P, Plomin, R, Craig, IW.

(2004). Gene-environment interaction analysis of serotonin system markers with adolescent

depression. Mol Psychiatry 9, 908–915.

Elzinga, BM, Molendijk, ML, Oude Voshaar, RC, Bus, BA, Prickaerts, J, Spinhoven, P,

Penninx, BJ. (2011). The impact of childhood abuse and recent stress on serum brain-derived

neurotrophic factor and the moderating role of BDNF Val66Met. Psychopharmacology (Berl,)

214(1), 319-28.

Emiliano, AB, Cruz, T, Pannoni, V, Fudge, JL. (2007). The interface of oxytocin-labeled cells

and serotonin transporter-containing fibers in the primate hypothalamus: a substrate for SSRIs

therapeutic effects? Neuropsychopharmacology 32, 977-988.

Page 53: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

53

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power

analysis program for the social, behavioural, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39,

175–191.

Fent K, Zibinden G. (1987). Toxicity of Interferon and Interleukin. TIPS 8, 100-5.

Gabbay V, Klein R, Alonso C, Babb J, Nishawala M, De Jesus G, Hirsch G, Hottinger-Blanc P,

Gonzalez C. (2009). Immune system dysregulation in adolescent major depressive disorder.

Journal of Affective Disorders 115;177-182.

Gabriel, SB, Schaffner, SF, Nguyen, H, Moore, JM, Roy, J, Blumenstiel, B. (2002). The

structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science 296, 2225-2229.

Geller, B, Craney, JL, Bolhofner, K, DelBello, M, Williams, M, Zimerman, B. (2001). Bipolar

disorder at prospective follow-up of adults who had prepubertal major depressive disorder. Am J

Psychiatry 158, 125-127.

Gold, PW, Gabry, KE, Yasuda, MR, Chrousos, GP. (2002). Divergent endocrine abnormalities

in melancholic and atypical depression: clinical and pathophysiologic implications. Endocrin

Metab Clin 31(1), 37-62.

Golden, RN, Ekstrom, D, Brown, TM, Ruegg, R, Evans, DL, Haggerty Jr, JJ, Garbutt, JC,

Pedersen, CA, Mason, GA, Browne, J, et al. (1992). Neuroendocrine effects of intravenous

clomipramine in depressed patients and healthy subjects. Am J Psychiatry 149, 1168-1175.

Gregory, SG, Connelly, JJ, Towers, AJ, Johnson, J, Boscocho, D, Markunas, CA, et al. (2009).

Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Med 7, 62.

Guo, CC, Nguyen VT, Hyett MP, Parker GB, Breakspear, MJ. (2015). Out-of-sync: disrupted

neural activity in emotional circuitry during film viewing in melancholic depression. Scientific

Reports 5, 11605.

Page 54: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

54

Hadzi-Pavlovic, D, Boyce, P. (2012). Melancholia. Curr Opin Psychiatr 25(1), 14–18.

Hankin, BL, Mermelstein, R, Roesch, L. (2007) Sex differences in adolescent depression: Stress

exposure and reactivity models. Child Development. 78:279–295.

Happonen, M, Pulkkinen, L, Kaprio, J, Van der Meere, J, Viken, RJ, Rose, RJ. (2002). The

heritability of depressive symptoms: multiple informants and multiple measures. J. Child.

Psychol. Psychiatry 43, 471-479.

Harkness, KL, Monroe, SM. (2006). Severe melancholic depression is more vulnerable than non-

melancholic depression to minor precipitating life events. J Affect Disord 91, 257–263.

Hasler, G, Drevets, WC, Manji, HK, Charney, DS. (2004). Discovering endophenotypes for

major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29(10), 1765–1781.

Heninger, GR, Charney, DS, Sternberg, DE. (1984). Serotonergic function in depression.

Prolactin response to intravenous tryptophan in depressed patients and healthy subjects. Arch

Gen Psychiatry 41, 398-402.

Hosang, GM, Shiles, C, Tansey, KE, McGuffin, P, Uher, R. (2014) Interaction between stress

and the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Med 16, 12-17.

Huang, YY, Battistuzzi, C, Oquendo, MA, Harkavy-Friedman, J, Greenhill, L, Zalsman, G,

Brodsky, B, Arango, V, Brent, DA, Mann, JJ. (2004). Human 5-HT1A receptor C(-1019)G

polymorphism and psychopathology. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 7, 441—451.

Hudziak, JJ, Rudiger, LP, Neale, MC, Heath, AC, Todd, RD. (2000). A twin study of inattentive,

aggressive, and anxious/depressed behaviours. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39, 469-

476.

Page 55: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

55

Hyett, MP, Parker, GB, Proudfoot, J, Fletcher, K. (2008). Examining age effects on prototype

melancholic symptoms as a strategy for refining definition of melancholia. J Affect Disord 109,

193–197.

Jacob, S, Brune, CW, Carter, CS, Leventhal, BL, Lord, C, Cook Jr, EH. (2007). Association of

the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) in Caucasian children and adolescents with autism. Neurosci

Lett 417, 6-9.

Joyce, PR, Mulder, RT, Luty, SE, McKenzie, JM, Rae, AM. (2003). A differential response to

nortriptyline and fluoxetine in melancholic depression: the importance of age and gender. Acta

Psychiatr Scand 108, 20–23.

Kaminsky, Z, Wang, SC, Petronis, A. (2006). Complex disease, gender and epigenetics. Ann

Med 38, 530-544.

Kapornai, K, Gentzler, AL, Tepper, P, Kiss, E, Mayer, L, Tamas, Z, Kovacs, M, Vetro, A,

International Consortium for ChildhoodOnset Mood Disorders. (2007). Early developmental

characteristics and features of major depressive disorder among child psychiatric patients in

Hungary. J Affect Disord 100, 91-101.

Kaufman, J, Yang, BZ, Douglas-Palumberi, H, Houshyar, S, Lipschitz, D, Krystal, JH, et al.

(2004). Social supports and serotonin transporter gene moderate depression in maltreated

children. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101(49), 17316–17321.

Kendler, KS, Gatz, M, Gardner, CO, Pedersen, NL. (2006). A Swedish national twin study of

lifetime major depression. Am J Psychiatry 163(1), 109-14.

Kessler, RC. (1997a). The effects of stressful life events on depression. Annu Rev Psychol 48,

191-214.

Page 56: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

56

Kessler, RC. (1997b). The diagnostic validity of melancholic major depression in a population-

based sample of female twins. Arch Gen Psychiat 54, 299–304.

Kim, JM, Stewart, R, Kim, SW, Yang, SJ, Shin, IS, Kim, YH, Yoon, JS. (2007). Interactions

between life stressors and susceptibility genes (5-HTTLPR and BDNF) on depression in Korean

elders. Biol Psychiat 62(5), 423-28.

Kirsch, P, Esslinger, C, Chen, Q, Mier, D, Lis, S, Siddhanti, S, Gruppe, H, Mattay, VS,

Gallhofer, B, Meyer-Lindenberg, A. (2005). Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social

cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci 25, 11489-11493.

Kiss, E, Gentzler, AM, George, C, Kapornai, K, Tamas, Z, Kovacs, M, Vetro, A. (2007). Factors

influencing mother-child reports of depressive symptoms and agreement among clinically

referred depressed youngsters in Hungary. J Affect Disord 100, 143-151.

Kokay, IC, Bull, PM, Davis, RL, Ludwig, M, Grattan, DR. (2006). Expression of the long form

of the prolactin receptor in magnocellular oxytocin neurons is associated with specific prolactin

regulation of oxytocin neurons. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290, R1216—R1225.

Kolvin, I, Barrett, LM, Bhate, SR, Berney, TP, Famuyiwa, OO, Fundudis, T, et al. (1991). Issues

in the diagnosis and classification of childhood depression. Brit J Psychiat 159 (Suppl 11), 9-11.

Kovacs, M, Devlin, B, Pollock, M, Richards, C, Mukerji, P. (1997). A controlled family history

study of childhood-onset depressive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 54, 613-623.

Kovacs M. (2003) Children's Depression Inventory (CDI): Technical Manual Update, Toronto,

Canada: Multi-Health Systems.

Lahiri, DK, Nurnberger Jr, JI. (1991). A rapid non-enzymatic method for the preparation of

HMW DNA from blood for RFLP studies. Nucleic Acids Res 19, 5444.

Page 57: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

57

Lee, R, Garcia, F, van de Kar, LD, Hauger, RD, Coccaro, EF. (2003). Plasma oxytocin in

response to pharmaco-challenge to Dfenfluramine and placebo in healthy men. Psychiatry Res

118, 129-136.

Legros, JJ. (2001). Inhibitory effect of oxytocin on corticotrope function in humans: are

vasopressin and oxytocin ying-yang neurohormones? Psychoneuroendocrinology 26, 649-655.

Lemonde, S, Turecki, G, Bakish, D, Du, L, Hrdina, PD, Bown, CD, Sequeira, A, Kushwaha, N,

Morris, SJ, Basak, A, Ou, XM, Albert, PR. (2003). Impaired repression at a 5-hydroxytryptamine

1A receptor gene polymorphism associated with major depression and suicide. J Neurosci 23,

8788-8799.

Levinson DF. The genetics of depression: a review. (2006). Biol Psychiatry 60(2), 84–92.

Liu, JW, Ben-Jonathan, N. (1994). Prolactin-releasing activity of neurohypophysial hormones:

structure-function relationship. Endocrinology 134, 114-118.

Liu, X, Gentzler, AL, Tepper, P, Kiss, E, Kothencne, VO, Tamas, Z, Vetro, A, Kovacs, M.

(2006). Clinical features of depressed children and adolescents with various forms of suicidality.

J Clin Psychiatry 67, 1442-1450.

Lopizzo, N, Bocchio Chiavetto, L, Cattane, N, Plazzotta, G, Tarazi, FI, Pariante, CM, Riva, MA,

Cattaneo, A. (2015). Gene-environment interaction in major depression: focus on experience-

dependent biological systems. Front Psychiatry 6, 68.

Lotrich, FE, Pollock, BG. (2004). Meta-analysis of serotonin transporter polymorphisms and

affective disorders. Psychiatr Genet 14, 121-129.

Lucht, MJ, Barnow, S, Sonnenfeld, C, Rosenberger, A, Grabe, HJ, Schroeder, W, Volzke, H, et

al. (2009). Associations between the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) and affect, loneliness

and intelligence in normal subjects. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33, 860-866.

Page 58: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

58

Mann, JJ, McBride, PA, Malone, KM, DeMeo, M, Keilp, J. (1995). Blunted serotonergic

responsivity in depressed inpatients. Neuropsychopharmacology 13, 53-64.

Maes, M, Maes, L, Schotte, C, Vandewoude, M, Martin, M, D’Hondt, P, et al. (1990). Clinical

subtypes of unipolar depression: Part III, Quantitative differences in various biological markers

between the cluster-analytically generated nonvital and vital depression classes. Psychiat Res 34,

59-75.

Mayer, L, Kiss, E, Baji, I, Skultéti, D, Vetró, Á. (2006). Relationship of depressive

symptoms and life events in a school-age population. Psychiatr Hung, 3: 210-218.

Mayer, L, Lopez-Duran, NL, Kovacs, M, George, C, Baji, I, Kapornai, K, Kiss, E, Vetro, A.

(2009). Stressful Life Events in a Clinical Sample of Depressed Children in Hungary. J Affect

Disord 115(1-2), 207–214.

Maziade, M, Roy, MA, Fournier, JP, Cliche, D, Merette, C, Caron, C, Garneau, Y, Montgrain,

N, Shriqui, C, Dion, C. (1992). Reliability of best-estimate diagnosis in genetic linkage studies of

major psychoses: results from the Quebec pedigree studies. Am J Psychiat 149, 1674-1686.

McGuffin, P, Rijsdijk, F, Andrew, M, Sham, P, Katz, R, Cardno, A. (2003). The heritability of

bipolar affective disorder and the genetic relationship to unipolar depression. Arch Gen

Psychiatry 60, 497-502.

Michopoulos, I, Zervas, IM, Pantelis, C, Tsaltas, E, Papakosta, VM, Boufidou, F, Nikolaou, C,

Papageorgiou, C, Soldatos, CR, Lykouras, L. (2008). Neuropsychological and hypothalamic–

pituitary-axis function in female patients with melancholic and non-melancholic depression. Eur

Arch Psy Clin N 258, 217–225.

Miller, SA, Dykes, DD, Polesky, HF. (1988). A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA

from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16(3), 1215.

Page 59: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

59

Misener VL, Gomez L, Wigg KG, Luca P, King N, Kiss E, Daróczi G, Kapornai K, Tamas Z,

Mayer L, Gádoros J, Baji I, Kennedy JL, Kovacs M, Vetró Á, Barr CL and the International

Consortium for Childhood-Onset Mood Disorders. (2008). Cytokine Genes TNF, IL1A, IL1B,

IL6, IL1RN and IL10, and Childhood-Onset Mood Disorders. Neuropsychobiology 58, 71–80.

McMahon, FJ, Buervenich, S, Charney, D, Lipsky, R, Rush, AJ, Wilson, AF, Sorant, AJ,

Papaniclaou, GJ, Laje, G, Fava, M,et al. (2006). Variation in the gene encoding the serotonin 2A

receptor is associated with outcome of antidepressant treatment. Am J Hum Genet 78, 804-814.

Mitchell, J, McCauley, E, Burke, P, Calderon, R, Schloredt, K. (1989). Psychopathology in

parents of depressed children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 28, 352-

357.

Morikawa O, Sakai N, Obara H, Saito N. (1998). Effects of interferon-alpha, interferon-gamma

and cAMP on the transcriptional regulation of the serotonin transporter. Eur J Pharmacol. 349,

317-324.

Mufson, L, Weissman, MM, Warner, V. (1992). Depression and anxiety in parents and children:

a direct interview study. J Anxiety Disorders 6, 1-13.

Murphy, D, Wells, S. (2003). In vivo gene transfer studies on the regulation and function of the

vasopressin and oxytocin genes. J Neuroendocrinol 15, 109-125.

Myint AM, Bondy B, Baghai TC, Eser D, Nothdurfter C, Schule C, Zill P, Muller N, Rupprecht

R, Schwarz MJ. (2013). Tryptophan metabolism and immunogenetics in major depression: A

role for interferon-γ gene. Brain Behav Immun 31, 128–133.

Nyholt, DR. (2004). A simple correction for multiple testing for single-nucleotide

polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with each other. Am J Hum Genet 74, 765-769.

Page 60: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

60

Oxenkrug GF, Turski W, Zgrajka W, Weinstock J, Ruthazer R, Summergrad P. (2014).

Disturbances of tryptophan metabolism and risk of depression in HCV patients treated with IFN-

alpha. J Infect Dis Ther 2(2), 131.

Ozan, E, Okur, H, Eker, C, Eker, OD, Gonul, AS, Akarsu, N. (2010). The effect of depression,

BDNF gene val66met polymorphism and gender on serum BDNF levels. Brain Res Bull 1:61–

65.

Papakostas, GL, Miller, KK, Peterson, T, Sklarsky, KG, Hilliker, SE, Klibanski, A, Fava, M.

(2006). Serum prolactin levels among outpatients with major depressive disorder during the

acute phase of treatment with fluoxetine. J Clin Psychiatry 67, 952-957.

Parker, G, Paterson, A. (2014). Melancholia: definition and management. Curr Opin Psychiatry

27(1), 1-6.

Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D (1996). Melancholia: A Disorder of Movement and Mood. New

York: Cambridge University Press.

Parsey, RV, Oquendo, MA, Ogden, RT, Olvet, DM, Simpson, N, Huang, YY, Van Heertum, RL,

Arango, V, Mann, JJ. (2006). Altered serotonin 1A binding in major depression: a [carbonyl-C-

11]WAY100635 positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 59, 106-113

Patas, K, Penninx, BW, Bus, BA, Vogelzangs, N, Molendijk, ML, Elzinga, BM, Bosker, FJ,

Oude, Voshaar RC. (2014). Association between serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor and

plasma interleukin-6 in major depressive disorder with melancholic features. Brain Behav

Immun 36, 71-9.

Pravica V, Perrey C, Stevens A, Lee J-H, Hutchinson IV. (2000). A Single Nucleotide

Polymorphism in the First Intron of the Human IFN-γ Gene: Absolute Correlation with a

Polymorphic CA Microsatellite Marker of High IFN-γ Production. Human Immunology 61(9),

863-866.

Page 61: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

61

Purcell, S, Cherny, SS, Sham, PC. (2003). Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and

association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19, 149-150.

Quinn CR, Dobson-Stone C, Outhred T, Harris A, Kemp AH (2012). The contribution of BDNF

and 5-HTT polymorphisms and early life stress to the heterogeneity of major depressive

disorder: a preliminary study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 46, 55–63.

Rice, F, Harold, G, Thapar, A. (2002). Assessing the effects of age, sex, and shared environment

on the genetic aetiology of depression in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Child

Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 43(8), 1039-1051.

Rice, F. (2010). Genetics of childhood and adolescent depression: insights into etiological

heterogeneity and challenges for future genomic research. Genome Med 2(9), 68.

Richard, S, Zingg, HH. (1990). The human oxytocin gene promoter is regulated by oestrogens. J

Biol Chem 265, 6098-6103.

Risch, N, Herrell, R, Lehner, T, Liang, KY, Eaves, L, Hoh, J, Griem, A, Kovacs, M, Ott, J,

Merikangas, KR. (2009). Interaction between the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTTLPR),

stressful life events, and risk of depression: a meta-analysis. 301(23), 2462-71.

Rush, AJ, Wisniewski, SR, Warden, D, Luther, JF, Davis, LL, Fava, M, Nierenberg, AA,

Trivedi, MH. (2008). Selecting among second-step antidepressant medication monotherapies:

predictive value of clinical demographic or first-step treatment features. Arch Gen Psychiat

65(8), 870-80.

Ryan, ND, Puig-Antich, J, Ambrosini, P, Rabinovich, H, Robinson, D, Nelson, B, et al. (1987).

The clinical picture of major depression in children and adolescents. Arch Gen Psychiat 44(10),

854-861.

Page 62: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

62

Savitz, JB, Drevets, WC. (2009). Imaging Phenotypes of Major Depressive Disorder: Genetic

Correlates. Neuroscience 164(1), 300–330.

Scantamburlo, G, Hansenne, M, Fuchs, S, Pitchot, W, Marechal, P, Pequeux, C, Ansseau, M,

Legros, JJ. (2007). Plasma oxytocin levels and anxiety in patients with major depression.

Psychoneuroendocrinology 32, 407-410.

Schotte, CK, Maes, M, Cluydts R, Cosyns, P. (1997). Cluster analytic validation of the DSM

melancholic depression: the threshold model: integration of quantitative and qualitative

distinctions between unipolar depressive subtypes. Psychiat Res 71(3), 181–195.

Sen, S, Duman, R, Sanacora, G. (2008). Serum BDNF, Depression and Anti-Depressant

Medications: Meta-Analyses and Implications. Biol Psychiatry 64(6), 527-532

Sherrill, JT, Kovacs, M. (2000). Interview schedule for children and adolescents (ISCA). J Am

Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39, 67-75.

Shyn, SI, Shi, J, Kraft, JB, Potash, JB, Knowles, JA, Weissman, MM, et al. (2011). Novel loci

for major depression identified by genome-wide association study of sequenced treatment

alternatives to relieve depression and meta-analysis of three studies. Mol Psychiatry 16, 202–

215.

Shyn, SI, Hamilton, SP. (2010). The genetics of major depression: moving beyond the

monoamine hypothesis. Psych Clin North Am 33(1), 125–140.

Sibolboro Mezzacappa, E, Endicott, J. (2007). Parity mediates the association between infant

feeding method and maternal depressive symptoms in the postpartum. Arch. Womens Ment

Health 10, 259-266.

Smoller, JW. (2016). The Genetics of Stress-Related Disorders: PTSD, Depression, and Anxiety

Disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 41(1):297-319.

Page 63: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

63

Strauss, J, Barr, CL, George, CJ, King, N, Shaikh, S, Devlin, B, Kovacs, M, Kennedy, JL.

(2004). Association study of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in adults with a history of

childhood onset mood disorder. Am J Med Gen (Neuropsychiatric Genetics) 131, 16-19.

Strauss, J, Barr, CL, George, CJ, Devlin, B, Vetro, A, Kiss, E, Baji, I, King, N, Shaikh, S,

Lanktree, M, Kovacs, M, Kennedy, JL and the International Consortium for Childhood-Onset

Mood Disorders. (2005). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor variants are associated with

childhood-onset mood disorder: confirmation in a Hungarian sample. Mol Psychiatr 10, 861-67.

Sullivan, PF, de Geus, EJ, Willemsen, G, et al. (2009). Genome-wide association for major

depressive disorder: a possible role for the presynaptic protein piccolo. Mol Psychiatry 14:359-

375.

Surtees, PG, Wainwright, NW, Willis-Owen, SA, Luben, R, Day, NE, Flint, J. (2006). Social

adversity, the serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism and major depressive disorder.

Biol Psychiatry 59, 224-229.

Thapar, A, McGuffin, P. (1994). A twin study of depressive symptoms in childhood. Br J

Psychiatry 165, 259-265.

Torner, L, Maloumby, R, Nava, G, Aranda, J, Clapp, C, Neumann, ID. (2004). In vivo release

and gene upregulation of brain prolactin in response to physiological stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 19,

1601-1608.

Triozzi PL, Kinney P, Rinehart JJ. (1990). Central Nervous System Toxicity of Biological

Response Modifiers. Ann NY Acad Sci 594, 347-354.

Tsai, SJ, Cheng, CY, Yu, YWY, Chen, J, Hong, CJ. (2003). Association study of a brain-derived

neurotrophic factor genetic polymorphism and major depressive disorders, symptomatology, and

antidepressant response, Am Journ Med Genet 123B, 19–22

Page 64: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

64

Verhagen, M, Meij, vd A, Deurzen, v PAM, Janzing, JGE, Arias-Vásquez, A, Buitelaar, JK,

Franke, B. (2010). Meta-analysis of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in major depressive

disorder: effects of gender and ethnicity. Mol Psychiatr 15, 260–71.

Wade, TJ, Cairney, J, Pevalin, DJ. (2002). Emergence of gender differences in depression during

adolescence: National panel results from three countries. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

41:190–198.

Warner, V, Mufson, L, Weissman, MM. (1995). Offspring at high and low risk for depression

and anxiety: mechanisms of psychiatric disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 34, 786-

797.

Widlöcher, DJ. (1983). Psychomotor retardation: clinical, theoretical, and psychometric aspects.

Psychiatr Clin North Am 6(1), 27–40.

Windle, RJ, Kershaw, YM, Shanks, N, Wood, SA, Lightman, SL, Ingram, CD. (2004). Oxytocin

attenuates stress-induced c-fos mRNA expression in specific forebrain regions associated with

modulation of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal activity. J Neurosci 24, 2974-2982.

Wu, S, Jia, M, Ruan, Y, Liu, J, Guo, Y, Shuang, M, et al. (2005). Positive association of the

oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) with autism in the Chinese Han population. Biol Psychiatry 58,

74-77.

Ylisaukko-oja, T, Alarcon, M, Cantor, RM, Auranen, M, Vanhala, R, Kempas, E et al. (2005).

Search for autism loci by combined analysis of Autism Genetic Resource Exchange and Finnish

families. Ann Neurol 59, 145-155.

Zetzsche, T, Frasch, A, Jirikowsi, G, Murck, H, Steiger, A. (1996). Nocturnal oxytocin secretion

is reduced in major depression. Biol Psychiatry 39, 584.

Page 65: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

65

Figure 1. BDNF polymorphism. The courtesy of Ágnes Fehér.

Figure 2. Cellular transport and secretion of BDNF.From the article titled the Yin and yang of

neurotrophin action by Bai Lu, Petti T. Pang & Newton H. Woo (2005). Nature Reviews

Neuroscience 6, 603-614.

Page 66: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

66

Appendix

I.

Page 67: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

67

II.

Page 68: Genetic and environmental risk factors, informative subtypes and

68

III.