general veritas netbackup scalability and performance benchmark infographic

1
FINDINGS: NETBACKUP PERFORMED A RESTORE OF 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS IN 56 MINUTES. COMPETITOR “V” FAILED TO PERFORM A RESTORE AT 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS. COMPETITOR “E” PERFORMED A RESTORE OF 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS IN 1 HOUR 31 MINUTES. RESULTS FOR: CONCURRENT RESTORE RESULTS FOR: APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOTS RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS FINDINGS: NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TO BACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS. COMPETITOR “V” REQUIRES 2X THE AMOUNT OF TIME TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT. COMPETITOR “C” REQUIRES 15X THE AMOUNT OF TIME TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT. 2:15 2:00 1:45 1:30 1:15 1:00 0:45 0:30 0:15 100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). When testing crash consistent backups, NetBackup’s snapshot technology backed up 1,000 virtual machines in less than 9 minutes. This is 15 times faster than Competitor “C”. Competitor “E” does not support this function. TOTAL TIME TO COMPLETE BACKUP (Hours/Minutes) 1,000 VMs FOR ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS SPEED TEST (Hours/Minutes) FINDINGS: NETBACKUP WAS ABLE TO PROTECT 1,000 VMS USING AN APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT IN 38 MINUTES. COMPETITOR “V” FAILED WHEN THE ENVIRONMENT GREW OVER 300 VMS. COMPETITOR “C” REQUIRED 2 HOUR AND 15 MINUTES TO PROTECT 1,000 VMS. COMPETITOR “E” DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS FUNCTION. 2:15 2:00 1:45 1:30 1:15 1:00 0:45 0:30 0:15 0:08 0:06 0:07 0:19 0:37 0:37 0:57 1:31 1:00 0:31 0:22 1 APP 8 APPs 16 APPs 24 APPs NetBackup, Competitor “E” and Competitor “V” delivered comparable performance for fewer concurrent restores. As additional applications were added NetBackup took less time than Competitors. NetBackup Competitor “E” Competitor “V” TIME TO COMPLETE CONCURRENT RESTORES (Hours/Minutes) 0 1:00 0:45 0:30 0:15 2:00 1:45 1:30 1:15 3:15 3:00 2:45 2:30 2:15 1,000 VMs FOR APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOTS SPEED TEST (Hours/Minutes) NetBackup Competitor “C” Competitor “E” Competitor “V” RESULTS FOR: HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP 15:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 14:00 6:00 4:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 5:00 7:00 13:00 0:25 2:52 2:18 2:33 0:43 6:16 3:58 5:09 1:11 8:00 5:22 5:53 2:51 8:44 8:36 14:32 NetBackup Competitor “C” Competitor “E” Competitor “V” 100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs Zoom & Rotate Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves you hours, especially in large-scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by the competitors to perform the backups. TOTAL TIME TO COMPLETE BACKUP (Hours:Minutes) FINDINGS: NETBACKUP IS UP TO 11 HOURS FASTER WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS 15:00 11:00 13:00 9:00 7:00 3:00 5:00 1:00 1,000 VMs FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST (Hours:Minutes) 5X 4X 3X 1X 2X 2:51 8:44 8:36 14:32 0:05 0:16 0:02 0:05 0:32 0:04 0:06 1:12 0:09 0:08 0:18 2:15 NetBackup Competitor “C” Competitor “E” Competitor “V” 2:15 Principled Technologies’ benchmark results show that in a growing enterprise data center using VMware, NetBackup will scale significantly better than competitors. NetBackup Competitor “V” Competitor “E” Competitor “C” RESULTS HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS CONCURRENT RESTORES BACKUP & RECOVERY SCALABILITY BENCHMARK SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD NetBackup IS THE MOST SCALABLE BACKUP & RECOVERY SOLUTION NetBackup FASTER 5 X NetBackup FASTER 15 X 1:45 2:00 1:30 1:15 0:45 1:00 0:00 0:15 0:30 15X 5X 10X 0:08 0:18 2:15 0:38 2:50 Failure to Backup FAILURE TO BACKUP DOES NOT SUPPORT FEATURE Want More Details ? go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-e go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-v go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-c Download the Full Reports Now RESULTS VMware Virtual Machines NetBackup TESTS PERFORMED BY An industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testing ALL TESTS BASED ON: • Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions • Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs • Real-world Situations and Workloads WHAT IS THE MOST SCALABLE SOLUTION? NetBackup Competitor “V” Competitor “E” Competitor “C” Principled ® Technologies VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTH DATA GROWTH = X LARGE SCALE PROBLEM Part# 21358455 © 2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Updated 08/15 Competitor “C” Competitor “E” Competitor “V”

Upload: veritas-technologies-llc

Post on 15-Apr-2017

2.997 views

Category:

Technology


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • FINDINGS:NETBACKUP PERFORMED A RESTORE OF 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS IN 56 MINUTES.

    COMPETITOR V FAILED TO PERFORM A RESTORE AT 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS.

    COMPETITOR E PERFORMED A RESTORE OF 24 CONCURRENT APPLICATIONS IN 1 HOUR 31 MINUTES.

    RESULTS FOR: CONCURRENT RESTORE

    RESULTS FOR: APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOTS

    RESULTS FOR: ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

    FINDINGS:NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TOBACK UP 1,000 VMS USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.

    COMPETITOR V REQUIRES 2X THE AMOUNT OF TIME TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT.

    COMPETITOR C REQUIRES 15X THE AMOUNT OF TIME TO COMPLETE THE SAME ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOT.

    2:15

    2:00

    1:45

    1:30

    1:15

    1:00

    0:45

    0:30

    0:15

    100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs

    Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). When testing crash consistent backups, NetBackups snapshot technology backed up 1,000 virtual machines in less than 9 minutes. This is 15 times faster than Competitor C. Competitor E does not support this function.

    TOTA

    L TI

    ME

    TO

    CO

    MPL

    ETE

    BA

    CKU

    P (H

    ours

    /Min

    utes

    )

    1,000VMs

    FOR ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTSSPEED TEST

    (Hou

    rs/M

    inut

    es)

    FINDINGS:NETBACKUP WAS ABLE TO PROTECT 1,000 VMS USING AN APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT IN 38 MINUTES.

    COMPETITOR V FAILED WHEN THE ENVIRONMENT GREW OVER 300 VMS.

    COMPETITOR C REQUIRED 2 HOUR AND 15 MINUTES TO PROTECT 1,000 VMS.

    COMPETITOR E DOES NOT SUPPORT THIS FUNCTION.

    2:15

    2:00

    1:45

    1:30

    1:15

    1:00

    0:45

    0:30

    0:15 0:08 0:06 0:07

    0:19

    0:37 0:37

    0:57

    1:31

    1:00

    0:310:22

    1 APP 8 APPs 16 APPs 24 APPs

    NetBackup, Competitor E and Competitor V delivered comparable performance for fewer concurrent restores. As additional applications were added NetBackup took less time than Competitors.

    NetBackup

    Competitor E

    Competitor V

    TIM

    E T

    O C

    OM

    PLE

    TE C

    ON

    CU

    RR

    EN

    T R

    ES

    TOR

    ES

    (Hou

    rs/M

    inut

    es)

    0

    1:0

    0

    0:4

    5

    0:3

    0

    0:1

    5

    2:0

    0

    1:4

    5

    1:3

    0

    1:1

    5

    3:1

    5

    3:0

    0

    2:4

    5

    2:3

    0

    2:1

    5

    1,000VMs

    FOR APPLICATION CONSISTENT SNAPSHOTSSPEED TEST

    (Hou

    rs/M

    inut

    es)

    NetBackup Competitor C Competitor E Competitor V

    RESULTS FOR:HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP

    15:00

    8:009:00

    10:0011:0012:00

    14:00

    6:00

    4:00

    0:001:002:003:00

    5:00

    7:00

    13:00

    0:25

    2:522:18 2:33

    0:43

    6:16

    3:58

    5:09

    1:11

    8:00

    5:225:53

    2:51

    8:448:36

    14:32NetBackupCompetitor CCompetitor ECompetitor V

    100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs

    Zoom & Rotate

    Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves you hours, especially in large-scale environments. As the environment scaled from 100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic increases in the time required by the competitors to perform the backups.

    TOTA

    L TI

    ME

    TO

    CO

    MPL

    ETE

    BA

    CKU

    P (H

    ours

    :Min

    utes

    )

    FINDINGS:NETBACKUP IS UP TO 11 HOURS FASTER WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMS

    15

    :00

    11

    :00

    13

    :00

    9:0

    0

    7:0

    0

    3:0

    0

    5:0

    0

    1:0

    0

    1,000VMs

    FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP SPEED TEST

    (Hou

    rs:M

    inut

    es)

    5X4X3X1X 2X

    2:51

    8:448:36

    14:32

    0:05

    0:16

    0:02 0:05

    0:32

    0:04 0:06

    1:12

    0:09 0:08

    0:18

    2:15

    NetBackupCompetitor CCompetitor ECompetitor V

    2:1

    5

    Principled Technologies benchmark resultsshow that in a growing enterprise datacenter using VMware, NetBackup will scalesignificantly better than competitors.

    NetBackupCompetitor VCompetitor ECompetitor CRESULTS

    HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & REC

    OVERY

    ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS

    CONCURRENT RESTORES

    BACKUP & RECOVERYSCALABILITY BENCHMARK

    SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD

    NetBackup IS THE MOSTSCALABLE BACKUP &

    RECOVERY SOLUTION

    NetBackup

    FASTER5X

    NetBackup

    FASTER15X

    1:4

    5

    2:0

    0

    1:3

    0

    1:1

    5

    0:4

    5

    1:0

    0

    0:0

    0

    0:1

    5

    0:3

    0

    15X5X 10X

    0:08

    0:18

    2:15

    0:382:50

    Failu

    re to

    Bac

    kup

    FAILURE TO BACKUP

    DOES NOT SUPPORT FEATURE

    Want More Details ?

    go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-e go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-v go.veritas.com/nbu-vs-c

    Download the Full Reports Now

    RESULTS

    VMware Virtual Machines

    NetBackup

    T E S T S P E R F O R M E D B YAn industry leader and expert in technology benchmark testingALL TESTS BASED ON: Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs Real-world Situations and Workloads

    WHAT IS THE MOSTSCALABLE SOLUTION?

    NetBackup

    Competitor V

    Competitor E

    Competitor C

    PrincipledTechnologies

    VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTHDATA GROWTH

    =XLARGESCALEPROBLEM

    Part# 21358455

    2015 Veritas Technologies Corporation. All rights reserved. Veritas and the Veritas Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Veritas Technologies Corporation or its affiliates in the U.S. And other countries. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    Updated 08/15

    Competitor CCompetitor ECompetitor V

    https://www.veritas.com/product/backup-and-recovery/backup-benchmark#overview