general education task force i
DESCRIPTION
General Education Task Force I. A Brief Review of General Education Models and Programs Spring 2013. Committee Members : Renata Gangemi, Romulo Magnaye , Robert Mentore, Paula Straile -Costa , Ashwani Vasishth, and Samantha Wittenberg. Caveat. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
General Education Task Force IA Brief Review of General Education
Models and ProgramsSpring 2013
Committee Members: Renata Gangemi, Romulo Magnaye, Robert Mentore, Paula Straile-Costa, Ashwani Vasishth, and Samantha Wittenberg
Caveat
• Our review is cursory at best, given the time constraints
• We limited our review to the level of categories, and did NOT drill down to the course level
• Our work should be the start of a process of exploration, not the end of it
Purpose of General Education(K. Waltzer, 2000)
• To become broadly educated (beyond the high school level)
• To begin to develop intellectual and moral imagination
• To become acquainted with different ways of knowing
• To increase capacities to think critically and independently
• To prepare for upper-level work in the disciplines• To develop capacities generally useful to life and
freedom, independent learning, and citizenship
Orientation
• There are two broad courses open to Ramapo College, in considering its General Education Curriculum:1. Build on our existing structure, and strengthen it2. Erect a new structure entirely
Best Practices(retrieved from University of Wisconsin-LaCrosse General Education Committee website: http://www.uwlax.edu/gened/Committee.htm)
• Whichever course we choose to take, we recommend the following:1. Intentional (alignment among goals, outcomes,
actions, results)2. Based on institution’s mission and broad goals3. Outcome based (curriculum, pedagogy, assessment
derived from expected outcomes)4. Receives institutional support in terms of student
learning, resource allocation, and faculty reward structure
Best Practices Continued
5. Faculty generated and with faculty endorsement and commitment (regular input from the faculty)
6. Integrated into the major or student’s program of study (across the baccalaureate degree)
7. Focuses on development of life-long learning and developing knowledge, skills and dispositions for participation as a citizen (in a democracy and globally)
8. Emphasis on integration or making connections across courses/disciplines
Best Practices Continued
9. Is viewed as one piece of a liberal education, not the totality of a liberal education10.Best faculty teach in the program11. Based on active learning12. Assessment is integral to the program
(embedded assessment & programmatic assessment)
13. Accountability for student learning
Existing Gen Ed Model
• Core Courses:– First-Year Seminar– Critical Reading and Writing II– Readings in the Humanities– Social Issues or Perspectives in Business in Society
Existing Gen Ed Model Continued
• Distribution Categories:– History– Mathematical Reasoning– Science with Experiential– Intercultural North America– International Issues– Topics: Arts and Humanities or Social Sciences
Existing Gen Ed Model Continued
• http://www.ramapo.edu/provost/ce-resources/
• http://ww2.ramapo.edu/facultystaff/fa/gecco/reports/Gen-Ed-SLOs-CurriculumMap.doc
Classic Gen Ed Models(R.R. Newton, 2000)
• Great Books– liberal arts colleges
• Scholarly Discipline– Research-oriented universities
• Effective Citizen– institutions with client-centered/public mission orientation
Classic Gen Ed Models(R.R. Newton, 2000)
ModelGreat Books Scholarly
DisciplineEffective Citizen
Key Insight Perennial human questions
Accumulated wisdom and ways of understanding the world
Service to a self-reforming democracy
Curriculum Unified historical review of responses in Western tradition
Key concepts and methods to be pieced together by students as a mosaic of disciplines
Knowledge and skills to prepare students for a modern society
Orientation Looks to past enduring ideas
Understanding intellectual treasures and methods
Develops tools and commitment
Faculty Broadly educated generalist
Disciplinary experts
Specialists educating non-specialist students
Core & Fluid Models(K. Waltzer, 2000)
• Fluid-distribution requirement or set of requirements• Core-pre-designed required course or sequence of courses;
emphasis on inter-relatedness of knowledge MODEL
Fluid Core
Key feature Distribution or set of requirements
Pre-designed sequence of courses
Curriculum Expose students to many disciplines
Expose students to a specific tradition or content
Faculty Easy to organize Difficult to organize
Integration Dependent upon advising – a weak link
Built into the curriculum through design
Culture of choice
Satisfied for students Not satisfied for students
Olivet College– Christian affiliation, in south central Michigan– Vision: Education for Individual and Social Responsibility– Liberal Arts Core curriculum (8 semesters) provides common learning
and shared experiences leading to a Portfolio
Liberal Arts Core Curriculum Requirements(41-43 credit hours)
Seminar (up to 8 credits, 1 credit per semester)
Writing & Rhetoric I &
II
Self & Community
Civilization Studies
PORTFOLIOCreative Experience
Natural World
Global Diversity
Mathematics Service Learning
Senior Experience
Amherst College– Only 1 requirement: first year seminar
• Inquiry-based introduction to– Critical thinking– Active learning– Writing
• Otherwise, an open curriculum– Leads to gaps in learning after increasing student diversity– New proposals by Committee on Academic Priorities
• Add 2 more intensive writing courses• Add 2.5 new courses for quantitative literacy• Provide more direction through academic advising
The College of New JerseyLiberal Learning (revised in 2002) – educating students for citizenship in a modern democracyGoal 1 - Intellectual and Scholarly Growth, FYS, Writing, Second LanguageGoal 2 - Civic Responsibilities – Global, race/ethnicity, gender – fulfilled by courses in gen. ed., the major and/or extended experiences*
*Community Engagement Requirement provides students with the opportunity to think critically and inclusively about their society and develop a hands-on understanding of the effects of class, power, and privilege
The College of New Jersey Continued
Goal 3 - Broad Sectors of Human Inquiry – BreadthOption A Choose an interdisciplinary minor or
second majorOption B Design your own interdisciplinary minor or second majorOption C Breadth Distribution – 3 courses in each
Arts and HumanitiesSocial Sciences and HistoryNatural Science and Quantitative Reasoning
Evergreen State
• No majors, no general education curriculum, no courses, no grades– Students design an academic pathway, rather than enroll
in a major (workshops are provided, faculty advise)– Programs based on a theme or topic (inter- and multi-
disciplinary) are team-taught by 2 or more faculty members
• Each program is 16 credits and spans 2 or 3 quarters• Each program may consist of lectures, labs, readings, seminars,
field study, studio work, or research projects• Programs are based on a theme and taught from different
perspectives– evaluative narratives are used to assess student learning
St. John’s College– Religiously affiliated liberal arts college with two campuses
located in Annapolis, MD and Santa Fe, NM– No strict distinction between the sciences and the
humanities– Reading list “serves as the core of the […] curriculum”
• First year is devoted to Greek authors• Second year “contains books from the Roman, medieval, and
Renaissance periods”• Third year covers 17th and 18th centuries• Fourth year covers 19th and 20th centuries
Conclusion
• There are many models• Most general education programs do not fall
into one model, but rather are hybrids• The key is constant communication between
Task Force II and the faculty• 90% of colleges and universities are in some
stage of remodeling their general education programs
ReferencesAmherst College Committee on Academic Priorities (2006). The Committee on
Academic Priorities 2006 (CAP). Retrieved fromhttps://www.amherst.edu/academiclife/dean_faculty/general_information/cap
The Evergreen State College. Academics. Retrieved fromhttp://www.evergreen.edu/academics.htm
Hart Research Associates (2009). Trends and emerging practices in general education. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/membership/documents/2009MemberSurvey_Part2.pdf
Olivet College. The Olivet Plan. Retrieved from http://www.olivetcollege.edu/about/olivet_plan.php
Olivet College. Academic overview. Retrieved fromhttp://www.olivetcollege.edu/academics/overview.php
Newton, R.R. (2000). Tensions and models in general education planning, Journal of General Education, 49(3), 165-181.
ReferencesSt. John’s College (2013). Reading list. Retrieved from
http://www.stjohnscollege.edu/academic/readlist.shtml The College of New Jersey. Liberal learning guide. Retrieved from
http://firstreg.pages.tcnj.edu/liberal-learning/University of Wisconsin LaCrosse General Education Committee
(2006). Best practices in general education. Retrieved from http://www.uwlax.edu/gened/Best%20Practices%20in%20General%20Education.doc
Waltzer, K. (2000). General education models: Pros & cons of general education strategies. Retrieved from http://web.ewu.edu/groups/academicaffairs/strategicplanning/GenEdModelsProCon.pdf
Zagari-Marinzoli, R. Advising FAQ for humanities and social sciences students and faculty. Retrieved from http://hss.pages.tcnj.edu/advising-resources/advising-faq-for-hss-faculty-and-students/