galaxy-halo gas kinematic connection at 0.3 < z < 1

15

Upload: garnet

Post on 14-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1. Glenn Kacprzak. NMSU. Collaborators:. Chris Churchill. NMSU. Chuck Steidel. Caltech. Method & Goals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1
Page 2: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

• Study Mg II quasar absorption line systems in order to understand the kinematics of halos probing distances out to 70 kpcs from the galaxies.

Therefore the galaxies in our sample are selected by the known

presence of Mg II absorption

• Determine whether the galaxy kinematics and/or morphologies are coupled to the halo kinematics

• Our main goal is to determine how early epoch galaxy halos are built and sustained.

Page 3: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

Mg II 2796, 2803

Page 4: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

2796 2803

Mg II 2796, 2803

Page 5: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

Velocity km s-1

Sample includes absorbers with W(2796) < 1

Page 6: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

Steidel et al. (2002)

Selected 5 edge-on galaxies

4 of the 5 showed the trend for the halo gas kinematics follows that of the galaxies

What is needed is a larger sample which represents a broad range of orientations with respect to the quasar line of sight

Page 7: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

z = 0.550 z = 0.551

z = 0.640 z = 0.661

z = 0.374

z = 0.525

z = 0.787

z = 0.346

z = 0.442

z = 0.553

z = 0.888

z = 0.729

z = 0.418 z = 0.494

z = 0.591

z = 0.298

z = 0.888

z = 0.472

z = 0.368z = 0.317

z = 0.437

z = 0.891z = 0.797

z = 0.656

z = 0.851

Orientated such that the QSO is down5”

5”

Page 8: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

QSO

Velocity

Inte

nsi

ty

PA = 45o i = 0o PA = 45o i = 30o PA = 0o i = 0o PA = N/A i = 90o

cos(PA)cos(i) = 0.61 cos(PA)cos(i) = 1.0 cos(PA)cos(i) = 0.0

Page 9: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

“Normal” Absorbers Wind Dominate & DLA Systems

Page 10: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1
Page 11: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

z = 0.550 z = 0.551

z = 0.640 z = 0.661

z = 0.374

z = 0.525

z = 0.787

z = 0.346

z = 0.442

z = 0.553

z = 0.888

z = 0.729

z = 0.418 z = 0.494

z = 0.591

z = 0.298

z = 0.888

z = 0.472

z = 0.368z = 0.317

z = 0.437

z = 0.891z = 0.797

z = 0.656

z = 0.851

Page 12: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

Simard et al. (2002)

NE

Page 13: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

Barred Spiral Structure!

If more than 5% of the galaxies total residual flux is due to asymmetries then these galaxies are considered to not be “normal”; they are “asymmetric”.

Schade et al. (1995)

HST Image Model Model Residual

RA32 RT

> 0.05

Page 14: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

“Normal” Absorbers Wind Dominate & DLA Systems “Nor

mal

” G

alax

ies

Asy

mm

etric

Gal

axie

s

Page 15: Galaxy-Halo Gas Kinematic Connection at 0.3 < z < 1

• Halo gas is “aware” of the kinematics of the galaxy (pilot study 5 galaxies).

• There are no clear trends between absorption strength and orientation of the galaxy. More detailed models are needed.

• Minor morphological perturbations are correlated to absorption strength. This may suggest that most Mg II absorption selected galaxies have had some previous minor interactions or harassments.

• 21 of 25 Keck HIRES spectra are in hand and are currently being analyzed. The remaining quasar spectra will be obtained in the near future.

• Obtain redshifts of remaining candidates in order to increase sample size to over 50.

• Obtain rotation curves of the galaxy using Gemini and Keck.