future vision of education beatrice isaac post university heritage college 1
TRANSCRIPT
1
FUTURE VISION OF EDUCATIONBEATRICE ISAACPOST UNIVERSITY
Heritage College
2
Introduction
The Heritage College is a private two-year education institution
located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The college prepares
students to succeed in the global marketplace, and offers courses
geared toward students’ success in their chosen field.
The college is digitally wired for the 21st century student,
and provides an array of student services, including career
services, student support and advisement, and offers online
courses. Most courses are delivered in the blended format,
which allows students to attend a class on campus one day
per week, and the other hours are completed online.
3
Mission Statement
The mission of the college is to prepare students for
success in the global marketplace, by providing the
necessary skills and development in their chosen
careers. When the college began, the vision for an
online learning community was already borne, waiting
to be established.
4
Education Technology Tools
Researchers (Merriam, et. al., 2007) indicatetechnology has created a shift in the informationsociety, thereby affecting the workforce. In thisrespect, technology has played a major role in theway the college conducted its business. Johnson, etal., (2014) list various technologies used in highereducation. The college has used one, the flippedclassroom, and with a future vision, the use of the
learninganalytics, to analyze students’ learning activities.
5
Education Technology Tools
The flipped classroom method of teaching is a method
that allows for hands-on learning, with skills
enhancement (Johnson et al., 2014). This has been a
successful method for advancing students’ thinking
skills, problem-solving skills, and communication skills.
6
Education Technology Tools
Analytics is a system whereby student data are
systematically analyzed for use in a statistical model
(Macneil, et al., 2014). This method of analysis would
be of importance in the decision-making process for
management and leadership of the college.
7
Futuring Methodology
Scenarios and scanning are two methods used for the
futuring strategy. Scenarios involve the study of
various courses of events that might occur in the future,
and allow for a variety of results. Scanning involves
the review and analysis of printed material, web sites,
etc. to determine trends and their impact on the future
(World Future Society Dictionary of Foresight n.d.).
8
Review of the Literature
The literature review involves scanning the
literature in order to discover and
summarize literature in the context of higher
education (Creswell, 2003).
9
Futuring Methodology
Advantages for the methods of futuring: Scenarios afford various avenues of results. Scenarios allow for the use of creativity. Scenarios reveal weaknesses in strategic planning. Scenarios provide for better collaboration amongst
those involved in strategic planning. Scenarios provide for a more strategic alignment
in bringing about cohesive results. Scenarios are not stringent planning tools. They
provide for flexibility to allow for changing circumstances.
10
Futuring Methodology
Disadvantages of the methods of futuring: Building scenarios can be an exhaustive approach. It
involves gathering much detail and information. Those who are experts in the industry
should be useful in scenarios building. Expert advice is not always cost effective, and readily available.
Various resources and information are needed to build scenarios. These are not always readily available.
11
Futuring Methodology
Scenario building is not a straight path function. Much input is needed from various avenues.
12
Review of the Literature
Literature discovered and reviewed in the context of higher education trends are identified.
Education technology trends: The trends for education technology involvesocial media; online, hybrid (blended) andcollaborative learning; data-driven learning andassessment; students becoming creators insteadof consumers.
13
Review of the Literature
Economic budgetary/and public policy trends: state and federal cuts in funding for education; decrease in public support as a result of losses on investments; federal reform in education (e.g. Race to the top initiative); increase in the cost of education.
Demographic trends: Factors contributing to changing demographics
include an aging society; diversity;
14
Review of the Literature
change in workforce; cultural differences in society; change in statistical makeup of minorities population in society.
In view of the dynamic changes affecting higher
education, it is imperative that all these avenues be
studied in order to develop a strategy for
sustainability for the present time and for the future
of Heritage College.
15
Rationale for Change
The elements for change include the following: Change in culture: From one of command and control
to one of knowledge and learning. Improved collaboration: Use of social networks for
communication. Implementation of online courses: This is needed for
growth and participation in the new higher education environment.
High cost of education: Develop plans for affordability of a college education (scholarships, etc.).
Create space for innovative and creative students: Students are becoming more creators and innovators.
16
Rationale for Change
Reform of education: Call for more transparency, accountability, and improved performance.
Diversity training: Training is needed to address the changing demographics of the institute.
17
Opportunities & Challenges
Opportunities include: Additional course delivery format: Online
learning. New program development: Continuing and
adult education programs. High school program: Provide college credits for
high school students. International students program: Attract students
from other countries. Expansion/satellite campuses: Taking education
to the neighborhoods.
18
Opportunities & Challenges
Challenges: High tuition costs. Recession/slow growth in economy. Rapid technology changes. Students’ lack of college-ready skills. Competition.
19
Plan for Change
Develop new organization culture Appoint strategic leader Define goals and strategies Establish a budget Analyze internal and external
environments
20
Call to Action Plan
This call to action plan covers the period 2014-2019. Call a meeting to include president of institute,
department directors, academic affairs dean (and all associates).
Form select committees; allocate responsibilities. Appoint strategic leader. Introduction and implementation of online course
delivery format. Introduction and implementation of learning
assessment software (learning analytics).
21
References
Akomo, D. (2013). Journal of Cultural Diversity 20(1), 3-6.
Angel, R. ((Spring-Summer) 2008). Transcultural impacts and perspectives on the future. Retrieved September 14, 2014, from www.futuretakes.org.
Cooper, A. (2012). What is analytics? Definition and essential characteristics. Cetis Analytics Series, 1(5). http://www.csun.edu/it/learning-analytics
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Method Approaches (Second Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
Dew, J. R. (2012). The Future of American Higher Education. World Future Review (4)4, 7-13.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A. (2014). NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Corporation.
22
References
MacNeill, S., Campbell, L.M., Hawksey, M. (2014). Analytics for education. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, p1-12.
MacNeill, S. (2012). Analytics: What is changing and
why does it matter? Cetis Analytics Series 1(1).
https://www.mapr.com/blog/top-10-big-data-challenges-%e2%80%93-serious-look-10-big-data-v%e2%80%99s
McGuinn, P. (2014). Presidential Policymaking: Race to the Top, Executive Power, and the Obama Education Agenda. The Forum 12(1), 91-79.
Meeker, H. (1993 (May-June)). Hands-on futurism: how to run a scanning project. The Futurist 27, 22-26.
Merriam, S.B., Caffarella, R.S., Baumgartner, L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. http://sabitas604.wordpress.com/category/assignments-3100/
23
References
Mietzner, D., Reger, G. (2005). Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. Int. J. Technology Intelligence and Planning, 220-239.
Millett, S. M. (2011). Five principles of futuring as applied history. The Futurist 45(1), 38-41
Mohrman, S. A. (2012). Generating knowledge that drives change. Academy of Management Perspectives, 41-51.
Poister, T. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 246-254.
Rabovsky, T. (2012). Accountability in Higher Education: Exploring impacts on state budgets and institutional spending habits. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(4), 675-700.
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., Shannon, G. J. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2) p 44-49.
24
References
Strand, R. (2014). Leadership of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-2017-3
World Future Society. (n.d.). Methods.
World Future Society. (n.d.). Dictionary of Foresight.