fuse entre for translational research in public health health … - embedding a... · 2020. 10....

2
Brief Title Calibri 49 (Align Text Leſt)... Fuse - Centre for Translaonal Research in Public Health A partnership of public health researchers across the five universies in North East England Working with policy makers and pracce partners to improve health and wellbeing and tackle inequalies A founding member of the NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR) LACoR: embedding a culture of research in local government Local government is ideally placed to draw on and develop evidence to influence public health and reduce inequalies. The return of public health to local government in 2012 provided opportunies for public health to influence wider local government policy and decisions. Austerity and public sector funding cuts have limited investment in research and evaluaon. Therefore, new models are needed to generate evidence through collaborave approaches. The LACoR proof of concept study was undertaken in collaboraon between Fuse, Queens University Belfast and University of Southampton and four local authories (Newcastle, Belfast and, Southampton Cies and Hampshire County Councils). We used a mixed methods approach including a rapid literature review, online scoping survey, 5 facilitated workshops, 14 interviews with LG staff in one local authority and social network analysis to explore factors influencing cultures of research and evidence use in local government. The study found no shared agreement about what countsas evidence in LG, with mulple cultures of evidence use co-exisng. Local authority staff who parcipated in this study were keen to use evidence to inform their work and some felt their research skills were underused. Praccal examples of innovave approaches to evidence use were idenfied in a changing landscape, including research champions and embedded researchers, operang in different ways as knowledge mobilisers and change agents. However, organisaonal churn, rising demands, fragmentaon and siloed thinking, combined with a lack of data sharing due to governance and access issues, and limited me and capacity for reflecon and analysis, limit the ability of LG staff to use evidence as a part of decision-making. The logic model idenfied three key themes that influence cultures of research and evidence use in local government: 1) Key Findings No one size fits all: embedding a research culture depends on context and organisaonal culture. Find an approach that fits best (and evaluate accordingly). Sustainable funding and incenves are required to support meaningful, co-producon opportunies. Networks of research champions within and between local authories and with academia are needed to address quesons which reflect the priories of LG. Researchers are needed as part of mul-agency teams working alongside research users, policy makers, and commissioners in local government to feed in insights and co-produce evidence-informed, context-relevant soluons. This requires trusng, respecul relaonships and a system wide approach to promong evidence use and creaon between LG, academia and wider stakeholders. Key principles for building evidence-informed policy and pracce in local government: Conceptual clarity - define the problemtogether drawing on mulple perspecves and acknowledge that what counts as evidence may vary. Co-producon - engage in dialogue from the outset and create conversaonal spaces. Co-design - create a flexible plan, not a detailed roadmap and recognise and develop assets and experse which people bring. Culture - dont parachute in, build an organisaonal culture to test out ideas and learn from the unexpected. The Local Authority Champions of Research (LACoR) study, funded by the Health Foundaon, explored how to embed a culture of research in local government (LG) to improve populaon health. The findings were translated into a logic model illustrang what helps and hinders evidence use in decision-making. increasing praccal data usage through data sharing agreements and governance frameworks and improved access to published evidence (data usage); 2) upskilling staff in academia and local government through Connuing Professional Development opportunies and secondments (people), and 3) creang conversaonal spaces with LG, changing relaonships and enhancing career pathways between LG and universies to enable interdisciplinary approaches to local priories (collaboraon).

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Brief Title Calibri 49 (Align Text Left)...

    Main body Calibri 10 Black (Align Text Left)… Key Findings

    Calibri 10 Black (Large Bullets)...

    Intro Calibri 15 (Align Text Left)...

    Fuse - Centre for Translational Research in Public Health

    A partnership of public health researchers across the five universities in North East England

    Working with policy makers and practice partners to improve health and wellbeing and tackle inequalities

    A founding member of the NIHR School for Public Health Research (SPHR)

    LACoR: embedding a culture of research in local government

    Local government is ideally placed to draw on and develop

    evidence to influence public health and reduce inequalities.

    The return of public health to local government in 2012

    provided opportunities for public health to influence wider

    local government policy and decisions. Austerity and public

    sector funding cuts have limited investment in research and

    evaluation. Therefore, new models are needed to generate

    evidence through collaborative approaches.

    The LACoR proof of concept study was undertaken in

    collaboration between Fuse, Queen’s University Belfast and

    University of Southampton and four local authorities

    (Newcastle, Belfast and, Southampton Cities and Hampshire

    County Councils). We used a mixed methods approach

    including a rapid literature review, online scoping survey, 5

    facilitated workshops, 14 interviews with LG staff in one local

    authority and social network analysis to explore factors

    influencing cultures of research and evidence use in local

    government. The study found no shared agreement about

    ‘what counts’ as evidence in LG, with multiple cultures of

    evidence use co-existing. Local authority staff who

    participated in this study were keen to use evidence to inform

    their work and some felt their research skills were underused.

    Practical examples of innovative approaches to evidence use

    were identified in a changing landscape, including research

    champions and embedded researchers, operating in different

    ways as knowledge mobilisers and change agents.

    However, organisational churn, rising demands,

    fragmentation and siloed thinking, combined with a lack of

    data sharing due to governance and access issues, and limited

    time and capacity for reflection and analysis, limit the ability

    of LG staff to use evidence as a part of decision-making.

    The logic model identified three key themes that influence

    cultures of research and evidence use in local government: 1)

    Key Findings

    No one size fits all: embedding a research culture depends on context and organisational culture. Find

    an approach that fits best (and evaluate accordingly).

    Sustainable funding and incentives are required to support meaningful, co-production opportunities.

    Networks of research champions within and between local authorities and with academia are needed to

    address questions which reflect the priorities of LG.

    Researchers are needed as part of multi-agency teams working alongside research users, policy

    makers, and commissioners in local government to

    feed in insights and co-produce evidence-informed,

    context-relevant solutions.

    This requires trusting, respectful relationships and a system wide approach to promoting evidence use

    and creation between LG, academia and wider

    stakeholders.

    Key principles for building evidence-informed

    policy and practice in local government:

    Conceptual clarity - define the ‘problem’ together drawing on multiple perspectives and acknowledge

    that what counts as evidence may vary.

    Co-production - engage in dialogue from the outset and create conversational spaces.

    Co-design - create a flexible plan, not a detailed roadmap and recognise and develop assets and

    expertise which people bring.

    Culture - don’t parachute in, build an organisational culture to test out ideas and learn from the

    unexpected.

    The Local Authority Champions of Research (LACoR) study, funded by the Health Foundation, explored how to embed a culture of research in local government (LG) to improve population health. The findings were translated into a logic model illustrating what helps and hinders evidence use in decision-making.

    increasing practical data usage through data sharing

    agreements and governance frameworks and improved

    access to published evidence (data usage); 2) upskilling

    staff in academia and local government through Continuing

    Professional Development opportunities and secondments

    (people), and 3) creating conversational spaces with LG,

    changing relationships and enhancing career pathways

    between LG and universities to enable interdisciplinary

    approaches to local priorities (collaboration).

    http://www.fuse.ac.uk/research/briefs/

  • Policy relevance and Implications

    Calibri 10 Black (Large Bullets)...

    Calibri 10 Black… (please include reference and hyperlink

    to full report / more information)

    fusebrief

    Quote from text Calibri 15 Italic (Align

    Text Left)...

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH

    Title... / Name… (Calibri 10 Black) Email: ... Telephone: ...

    Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    No. Month 2019

    All Fuse briefs produced by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, in conjunction with the academics involved in the research. Email: [email protected] or Tel: 01642 342987 for details.

    Policy relevance and implications Local government

    Create spaces and capacity for reflections between departments to encourage evidence use in decision-

    making.

    Build on existing assets, such as research champions, staff research skills and qualifications, and knowledge

    and expertise across local government (LG) in applying

    evidence.

    Pro-actively engage with universities and individual academics that share your values.

    Embedded research can improve links between policy, practice and academia with the right approach but

    may be limited in its sphere of influence.

    Academia

    Go where the energy is.

    Context is everything; take account of the social, political, financial, regulatory and legal context of LG

    and spend time with decision-makers to understand

    this context.

    Strive for an appropriate balance between academic rigour and timeliness – co-produce ‘good enough’

    research for decision-making.

    Research funders

    Increase investment in meaningful co-production opportunities.

    Adapt the funding infrastructure to local government needs (responsive, rapid evaluation, flexible

    timescales and objectives).

    The research was undertaken from January to October

    2019. Following the successful completion of the LACoR

    proof of concept study, the research team led by Professor

    Ashley Adamson has been awarded a UK Prevention

    Research Partnership (UKPRP) Consortium Development

    Grant building upon the work from this study.

    Local Authority Champions of Research Project: A Report for

    the Health Foundation

    www.fuse.ac.uk/askfuse/resources/LACoR%20report%

    20final%20311019%20draft%20for%20website.pdf

    Evidence by Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0 Alpha Stock Images

    “What I really want is academics

    who want to partner and who care

    about the outcome”

    FURTHER INFORMATION

    Prof Ashley Adamson, Professor of Public Health Nutrition and NIHR Research Professor, Newcastle University Email: [email protected]

    Fuse, the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, is a collaboration of the 5 North East Universities of Durham, Newcastle, Northumbria, Sunderland & Teesside.

    Website: fuse.ac.uk/research/briefs Blog: fuseopenscienceblog.blogspot.co.uk Facebook: facebook.com/fuseonline Twitter: @fuse_online Email: [email protected]

    CONTACT DETAILS

    No. 27 Oct 2020

    All Fuse briefs produced by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, in conjunction with the academics involved in the research. Email: [email protected] or Tel: 01642 342987 for details.

    http://fuse.ac.uk/mailto:[email protected]://www.fuse.ac.uk/askfuse/resources/LACoR%20Final%20Report%20October%2019.pdfhttp://www.fuse.ac.uk/askfuse/resources/LACoR%20Final%20Report%20October%2019.pdfhttp://www.nyphotographic.com/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/http://alphastockimages.com/mailto:[email protected]://fuse.ac.uk/research/briefs/http://fuseopenscienceblog.blogspot.co.uk/https://www.facebook.com/fuseonlinehttps://twitter.com/fuse_onlinemailto:[email protected]://fuse.ac.uk/research/briefs/http://fuse.ac.uk/mailto:[email protected]