funds management for financial institutions
TRANSCRIPT
1
Funds Management
for
Financial Institutions
February 8-10, 2006
2
Welcome
1. Introduction
2. Overview of Risk and Risk Management
3. ALM Overview
4. Funds (Liquidity risk) Management
5. IRR Management
6. FX Risk Management
7. Credit Risk Management
8. Summary and Review
3
1. Workshop Introduction
4
Sarah W. Hargrove
Native of North Carolina
Wharton MBA, CFA
Thirty years of experience in investment and commercial banking in NY, NC and PA
Top bank regulator in Commonwealth of PA with supervision of banks, savings institutions, licensed lenders, pawnbrokers…..aggregate assets of USD 90 billion
Consulting for past 10 years in emerging markets (Russia and other CIS, Thailand, Turkey, China, Jordan) ranging from bank appraisals, bank supervision and bank technical assistance
Special expertise in bank supervision, bank valuation, risk management and corporate governance
5
Objectives of Workshop
To understand the role of ALM and its relationship to strategic and annual profit planning
To be able to define and measure different risks involved in financial intermediation
To understand how ALM decisions affect changes in net interest margin, ROA and ROE
To be able to design ALM strategies in different interest rate environments
To understand the role of capital in ALM decisions
6
There are some administrative matters to review
Hours 9:00 am – 5:00 pm
Breaks: 10:30 am –10:45 am
12:00 pm – 1:00 pm
3:00 pm – 3:15 pm
Summary and feedback at end of each session
No cell phones!
7
We will first review some basic principles of risk and risk management
Definition of risk and risk/reward trade-off
Purpose of capital and role of risk management
The road to Basel 2
Major risks faced by financial institutionsCredit riskMarket riskOperational risk
RAROC/RORAC principles
8
We will then look at an overview of Asset Liability Management
Management of non-credit financial risks
Objectives of ALM
Framework for ALM decision-making
Determining risk appetite
Business strategies in different interest rate environments
9
We will review funds management
Tools of funds management
Application of tools
Asset liquidity vs liability liquidity
Determination of minimum liquidity needs
10
We will then examine how gap analysis is used to measure and manage IRR
Periodic and cumulative gaps
Static and dynamic gaps
Data needed for a gap report
Steps in preparation of a gap report
11
We will look at another aspect of ALM: FX risk management
Definition of FX risk
Identification of FX risk: Long vs short positions
Measurement of FX risk
Management of FX risk
12
We will look at risk valuation methods
Value at risk and earnings at risk
Inverse relationship
Capital Asset Pricing Model
Systematic vs diversifiable riskStandard deviation
Correlation and covariance
13
We will look at credit risk valuation methods
Individual vs Portfolio risk
Default factors
Marginal risk
Expected lossProbability of default
Loss given default
Exposure at default
Unexpected loss
14
We will then apply the risk management principles to business planning
Sensitivity analysis
Flexible budget allocation
Volatility of earnings and EVE
Application of ModelsDangers of Models
Limitations of Models
15
The last day will be devoted to review
Putting it all together with case study
Final review
16
2. Overview of Risk and Risk Management
17
Financial institutions intermediate capital flows between savers and borrowers
Sources of Funds(Surplus accounts or Savings)
Users of Funds(Deficit accounts or Borrowings)
18
Financial institutions assume risks in the intermediation process
Economic Sectors Intermediaries
Assets Liabilities
Insurance Companies
Pension Funds
Businesses
Governments
Households
Banks, Savings Assoc., Investment Banks, Leasing Cos.
Stock Exchange
Other markets
Liabilities Assets
19
Certain principles rule financial intermediation in free markets
Supply and demandInterest rate as the “clearing price”Opportunity cost of consumption/investment
Rational investorsRisk averseMaximize return/Minimize risk
Efficient marketsAllocation of resourcesInformation impounded in pricesCompetitionEconomies of scale
20
Accumulation/protection of capital is the goal of risk taking and risk management
Capital represents net assets or shareholder ownership
Capital serves to absorb lossesOperating or financial losses
Protects other creditors
Permits growth
Equity is the most costly source of capital
21
What is risk?
The concept of financial risk underlies modern portfolio theory with roots in capital market and investment theory
Risk aversionRisk premiumsHistorical and expected returnsProbability distributionsVariance and standard deviationSystematic vs diversifiable risk
22
Perceived risk is based on historical or expected volatility
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Series1Series2
23
What is return?
Cash flows
Net income
Dividends
Capital appreciation/gainsTime value of money
PV = Σ Cn=o-t (1+r)n
FV = Σ C (1+r) nn=o-t
24
The higher the risk, the higher the required rate of return
Required rate of return determines the priceCurrent income streamCapital appreciation
Based on perceived riskThe greater the historical volatility the greater the riskThe greater the uncertainty the greater the risk The longer the horizon the greater the risk
25
Risk is priced by the discount rate: absolute and relative
Rate of Return
RiskPremium
Risk FreeRate
MV=PV = Σ C + TVt=0-n (1+r)t (1+r)t
Treasury Bonds
First Mortgage Bonds
2nd Mortgage BondsSubordinated Debentures
Income BondsPreferred Stock
Conv. PreferredCommon Stock
AAAAA
ABBB
BB
B
CCC
Level of Risk
26
There is risk-reward trade-off inherent in financial intermediation
Short-term vs longer-termLiquidityFloating vs fixed ratesCreditLeverage
Risk is the uncertainty or the standard deviation of probable returns
27
How much capital does a bank need?
“Enough…but not too much.”
28
What is enough capital?
Capital protects depositors and other creditorsSafety and soundnessSupports growthIs a buffer against lossesCan be in the form of non-equity
Equity capital represents owners’ interests Last creditors to be paid in liquidationRequires a return in cash income and appreciationRetained earnings are a good source of capital
29
What is too much capital?
Capital is a non-interest bearing source of fundsEquity capital is the most expensive source of fundsMust earn a required rate of return (ROE)Is a scarce resource
Management’s goal is to maximize risk-adjusted returns
Rational investor theoryCompetes with risk-free rate and alternative investmentsAffects pricing and competitive position if too much
30
Bank management must satisfy different stakeholders with different objectives
Owners
Regulators/Rating Agencies Employees
Return
Pricing
Safety and Soundness
Compensation
Customers
31
Capital adequacy is in the eyes of the beholder
Focus is historical cost of assets and recognition of impairment (fair value)
Focus is historical cost of assets and recognition of impairment (fair value)
Accounting capital
Market capital
Economic capital
Regulatory capital
Focus is income, the market’s expectations and required return
Focus is income, the market’s expectations and required return
Focus is market value (PV of cash flows) of assets/liabilities
Focus is market value (PV of cash flows) of assets/liabilities
Focus is balance sheet and income risk and capital components
Focus is balance sheet and income risk and capital components
BIS II attempts a more precise calibration of economic and regulatory capital
32
In a perfect market the different capital definitions would theoretically be equal
Book values represent present values of future cash flows discounted at current required rates of return
Market values of capital stock reflect net present values
Economic capital is the same as net book value
Regulatory capital would be a realizable value of assets in excess of liabilities
33
But financial markets are neither perfect nor efficient
Different expectations
Abnormal profits
Asymmetrical and imperfect information
Information not instantaneously impounded in prices
Transactions costs
Etc.
34
Banking regulation has historically protected the industry from undue risks
Restricted licenses
Geographical limitations
Interest rate ceilings
Product line uniqueness
Limited competition
Let’s look at how regulation has evolved as these protections eroded and market structures changed
35
World-wide trends have changed the nature of banking
Deregulation and liberalization of markets
Globalization and interdependence of markets
Technological advances
Product innovation and increased complexity
Increased size and speed of financial transactions
Increased competition
Increased volatility and risk
36
Bank regulatory trends have followed – but with a lag
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
Risk
-bas
ed
Capi
tal
Regu
lato
ry /
acco
untin
g
stan
dard
s co
nver
genc
eRi
sk m
anag
emen
t vs.
risk
avoi
danc
e
Inte
rest
rate
and
mar
ket d
ereg
ulat
ion
New rules follow every financial crash, almost always with unintended consequences.Economist, October 5, 2002
37
The introduction of “primary capital” led to unintended consequences
Reduction in liquid assets
“Gains trading” to create capital
Explosion of off-balance sheet items
Overcapitalized banks and disintermediation
Undercapitalized banks in emerging markets
Unfair competition
Inte
rest
rate
and
m
arke
t de
regu
latio
n
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
38
Different capital requirements allowed some banks to gain market share
Japanese Bank US Bank
Loan USD 100 million USD 100 million
Net interest margin .6% 1.25%
Income USD 600,000 USD 1,250,000
Capital 2% 6%
USD 2 million USD 6 million
ROE 30% 20.8%
39
The 1988 BIS Capital Accord created an international level playing field
Harmonized capital standards with risk-based capital
Addressed off-balance sheet assets
Distinguished among riskiness of different asset classes
Applied to large, internationally active banks
Risk
-bas
ed
Capi
tal
Inte
rest
rate
an
d m
arke
t de
regu
latio
n
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
40
Regulation of capital has become the primary tool to limit bank risk-taking
Tier I: Shareholders’ equity (Paid-in capital and R/E)
Tier II: Supplementary capital
Tier III: Add on capital to support market risk only
Risk
-bas
ed C
apita
l
Inte
rest
rate
and
mar
ket d
ereg
ulat
ion
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
41
Since 1988, other banking standards have converged with capital standards
Core Principles of Effective Supervision (1995)
Amendments ….to Incorporate Market Risk (1996,1998)
Principles for the Management of Interest Rate Risk (1997)
Framework for Internal Control Systems (1998)
Guidelines for Corporate Governance (2000)
Principles for Internal Audit (2001)
BIS II
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
Risk
-bas
ed
Capi
tal
Inte
rest
rate
and
m
arke
t de
regu
latio
n
Regu
lato
ry /
acco
untin
g st
anda
rds
conv
erge
nce
42
BIS II permits banks to customize capital adequacy assessment
New guidelines intend to align regulatory capital requirements more closely with underlying risk
Emphasis is on banks’ risk management and economic capital allocations
There is flexibility in assessing capital adequacy: standardized vs. IRB approaches
Prim
ary
capi
tal
regu
latio
n
Risk
-bas
ed
Capi
tal
Risk
m
anag
emen
t vs
. Ri
sk
avoi
danc
e
Inte
rest
rate
and
m
arke
t de
regu
latio
n
Regu
lato
ry /
acco
untin
g st
anda
rds
conv
erge
nce
43
Capital adequacy should be a function of a bank’s mission, strategy and risk tolerance
Mission
Bank Strategy
♦ Capital Allocation♦Pricing
Business Plans for PriorityBusiness Segments
♦ Target Customers, Products/Services♦ Objectives and Business / Financial Plans
Support Infrastructure
♦ Performance Management♦Funding and Liquidity
44
Capital should be set to meet a bank’s target credit rating
S & P RATING MOODY’S EQUIVALENT
DEFAULT PROBABILITY (SUBSEQUENT YEAR)
AAA Aaa 0.01%
AA Aa3/A1 0.03% A As/A3 0.10%
BBB Baa2 0.30% BB Ba1/Ba2 0.81% B Ba3/B1 2.21%
CCC B2/B3 6.00% CC B3/Caa 11.68% C Caa/Ca 16.29%
The higher the rating the more unexpected losses that need to be covered by capital
45
Capital must be allocated to cover major risks to the appropriate confidence level
Credit Risk• Standardized Approach• IRB Approach
• Foundation • Advanced
Market Risk• Standardized Approach• Internal Models Approach
Operational Risk • Basic Indicator Approach• Standardized Approach• Internal Measurement Approach
Minimum 8% of Capital to Risk-Weighted
Assets
46
Capital adequacy is a function of three pillars
Mutually reinforcing factors that
determine capital adequacy
Pillar 3: Market Discipline • Formal disclosure policy• Describe risk profile, capital levels, risk
management process and capital adequacy
Pillar 1: Minimum Capital• Internal capital assessment process
and control environment• Capital f (how sound the process is)
Pillar 2: Supervisory Review • Review assessment process• Evaluate IRR in banking book
47
Ultimately the financial market is the harshest regulator
Market Discipline
Quantitative Requirement Qualitative Requirement
Public Disclosure
Minimum Capital Requirement
Supervisory Review Process
• Many players• Self interested,
rational• Independent• Real time
• Many players• Self interested,
rational• Independent• Real time
48
The level of capital required is a function of the quality of information
The less the history, the less reliable the dataThe less certain or transparent, the greater the riskThe more the risk, the more capital neededAll the above implies higher capital levels for some banks in less mature markets
49
BIS II guidelines are guidelines only …but have become best practice
The quality of bank management, particularly the risk management
process, is the key concern in ensuring the safety and stability of
both individual banks and the system as a whole.
50
The purpose of capital is to absorb unexpected losses and support growth
““Capital is not a substitute for inadequate Capital is not a substitute for inadequate control or for risk management control or for risk management processes.processes.””
- Bank for International Settlements
51
Assumption of risk is the raison d’etreof banking
Banks make money by assuming risk
Banks lose money by not managing risk or by not getting paid for the risk assumed
Banks manage what they measure
52
A formalized risk management framework is best practice
Risk Management is the deliberate acceptance of risk for profit – making informed decisions on the trade-offs between risk and reward and using various financial and other tools to maximize risk-adjusted returns within pre-established limits.
53
A Risk Management framework facilitates informed decision-making
Identify
Measure
Manage
Monitor
54
Risk Management is now basic to financial management
“The nature of Risk Management in banks is changing fundamentally. Until recently, it has been an exercise in damage limitation. Now it is becoming an important weapon in the competitive struggle between financial institutions.
Those who can manage and control their risks best will be the most profitable, lowest priced producers. Those who misjudge or mis-price will be out on their ear.”
The Risk GameThe Economist, Survey of International Banking (1996)
55
Risk management permits the optimization of the risk-reward trade-offs
The primary objective is to minimize the volatility of earnings and capital (hence the risk as perceived by investors) and at the same time earn a ROE to maintain the value of the common equity.
56
Different risks affect different parts of the income stream and capital levels
Net Interest IncomeAverage Assets
Non Interest IncomeAverage Assets
OverheadAverage Assets
Income TaxesAverage Assets
Return onAverage TotalAssets
LeverageMultiplier
Return onAverageEquity
(x)
(+)
(-)
(-)
ProvisionsAverage Assets
(-)
Credit risk
Operating risk
Market risk
Interest rate risk
ALM Focus
ALM Concern
57
Rational shareholders require a return commensurate with risk
Balance Sheet
EquityAssets Liabilities
Equity
Net Interest IncomeAverage Assets
Non Interest IncomeAverage Assets
OverheadAverage Assets
Income TaxesAverage Assets
Return onAverage TotalAssets
LeverageMultiplier
Return onAverageEquity
x
+
-
-
ProvisionsAverage Assets
-
Income Statement
58
RAROC rigorously calculates returns –recognizing the capital cost of risk
RAROC: Risk-adjusted return on capital
RAROC =Profit
Economic Capital
Provisions _
Revenue less funding and other costs
Predictable losses are expensed
The cushion needed to support Unexpected Losses
59
RAROC allows bank management to make proper risk-reward trade-offs
Interest and fee income xxxLess cost-of-funds (xxx)Net interest income xxx Less “expected loss” (xxx)Less non interest expenses (xxx)Pretax income xxxLess tax (xxx)
xxx
Divided by Economic xxxCapital
RAROC X%
Interest and fee income xxxLess cost-of-funds (xxx)Net interest income xxx Less “expected loss” (xxx)Less non interest expenses (xxx)Pretax income xxxLess tax (xxx)
xxx
Divided by Economic xxxCapital
RAROC X%
Pricing guidelines
FTP
Credit analysis
Allocated capital
Direct and allocatedindirect costs
Applied to hurdle rate
Loan/Product/Branch
60
RAROC drives BIS Pillar 1: Depends on a bank’s own capital charge given risks
Risk
RiskFreeRate
Return
Business Units, Sub-Portfolios, Transactions•
•
•
Efficient Frontier
RAROC
•
61
One of the most difficult aspects of RAROC is the assignment of EC
RAROC uses a bank’s own allocation
RORAC uses BIS assigned weights
The more the capital the more the perceived risk of the asset….but more conservative and less risky the bank
The more the capital the higher the required return from the asset
62
Which bank is the “better bank”?
A B
ROE 20% 20%
ROA 2% 1%
Net Int. Income 2% 6%
Other Income 6% 1%
Spread 6% 6%
NIM 4% 7%
How do we explain the differences in measures of profitability?
63
3. Asset Liability Management Overview
64
ALM is one component of a broader risk management framework
Credit Risk Management
Internal Audit
Treasury Management
ALM
65
ALM’s focus is non-credit financial risks
Interest rate risk
Capital risk
Liquidity risk
Foreign currency risk
66
Market risk is due to movements in market prices or interest rates
Liquidity risk
Interest rate risk
Foreign currency risk
Equity price risk
Commodity price risk
Banking Book
Trading Book
67
ALM is the process of managing the interest spread while insuring liquidity
The ultimate viability of a bank depends on management’s ability to manage both assets and liabilities to provide adequate liquidity and adequate protection of both earnings and capital against significant marketinterest rate fluctuations
68
It is a balancing act to achieve the bank’s objectives within risk limits
Net Interest Income
Market Value of Equity
69
ALM is a process of making risk/reward trade-offs.
Expe
cted
Ret
urn
Risk/Standard Deviation
A
C
B
70
ALM manages the structural balance sheet to satisfy the different stakeholders
Market Value
Return on Equity
Return on Assets
Net interest margin
Capital Adequacy
Liquidity
71
ALM is an integrated function of strategic, profit and capital planning
Set Policies and Objectives (including FTP rules)
Gather External
Information
Develop and Assess
Scenarios
Collect and Analyze Internal
data
Set Liquidity
Policy
Set Interest
rate position
SetFX
Exposure position
Set investment
and earnings management
guidelines
Execute
Interest RatesFX ratesEconomyReg .trendsCompetition
Business strategy &
credit policy
Drives strategy and credit risk management
72
ALM manages the banking book usually through an ALCO
Targets
ALCO
Balance sheet composition
Funding requirements
Interest rate risk management
Capital planning
Profit planning
Loan pipeline
TreasuryExecution arm for ALCO Customer transactionsIssue bondsFX tradingCash managementDerivatives/hedgingFunds transfer pricing
Business Units
FISReportsMonitor
FTPRAROC
73
ALCO monitors economic environment, actual vs plan and adjusts accordingly
• Planning/Budgeting• Yield and spread analysis• Capital allocations
Executes ALCO’s Transactions• Funding/FTP• Cash Management• Investment Portfolio• Hedging/DerivativesManages Trading Risk• Securities• Derivatives• Foreign Currency
Treasury
FAD
Reports
ALCO Targets
FIS
Asset Pipeline
• Customer Relationships• Loan originations• Deposit gathering
Business Units
ALM risks arise due to a mismatch between assets and liabilities capital
Contractual differences between assets and liabilities
Yield curve
Exchange rates
Customer preferences
75
The objectives are a predictable level of earnings and growth
Financial ObjectivesShort-term: Net income
Long-term: Market Value of Equity
Balance Sheet ObjectivesBalance Sheet growth targets
Capital Growth and Dividends
Markets served and markets ignored
Product offerings and Pricing
Desired image of bank
76
ALM seeks to maximize ROE within given risk limits
Net Interest IncomeAverage Assets
Non Interest IncomeAverage Assets
OverheadAverage Assets
Income TaxesAverage Assets
Return onAverage TotalAssets
LeverageMultiplier
Return onAverageEquity
(x)
(+)
(-)
(-)
ProvisionsAverage Assets
(-)
77
Net interest income is usually the most predicable source of earnings
Cost ofInterest-paying
Liabilities
Net Interest Spread
Gain (Loss)
Net InterestMargin on EarningAssets
Earning AssetsTotal Assets
(x)Earning Assets -Interest BearingLiabilities
Cost ofInterest-payingLiabilities
Interest Yield onEarning Assets
(-)
(+/-)
(x)
NIM
78
Interest margin objective worksheet
Determining Interest MarginRequired Net Income plus operating expenses plus loan and security losses plus taxes
Net Income OperatingExpenses
Loan and Security Loss
Taxes
5 + 6 + 7 + 8
Determined Required Return on AssetsDesired Return on Equity times Required Equity to Assets Ratio equals % Return on Assets
ROE Capital Ratio ROA
1x
2=
3
Determined Required Net IncomeDecimal Required Return on Assets Times Total Assets equals net income
ROA Assets Net Income
3ax
4=
5
Less fees equals desired margin
Fees Interest Margin-
9=
10
79
Target ROE can be achieved if each asset produces its return on allocated equity
Required ROE of 20% with Capital Ratio of 10%
NetAssets Income Capital Return
Cash 10 0 0 0%
Investments 20 0.6 3 20%
Loans 70 1.4 7 20%
Total 100 2.0 10 20%
80
Capital is a scarce resource and its effective utilization is a focus of ALM
Bank Profits
Business Unit Profits
Product Profitability
Client Profitability
Staff Productivity
81
The goal of ALM is to maximize returns to shareholders over the long run
Strategic and financial planning
Earnings and capital
guidelines
Business & balance sheet mix Other key ratios
and targets
82
A bank’s strategy is the backdrop for any ALM policy
Performance-driven
Mission
Bank Strategy
♦ Capital Allocation♦Pricing
Business Plans for PriorityBusiness Segments
♦ Target Customers, Products/Services♦ Objectives and Business / Financial Plans
Support Infrastructure
♦ Performance Management♦Funding and Liquidity
83
Consider whether all a bank’s assets should be allocated to interbank loans?
Commercial Interbank
Loan Amount 100 million 100 million
NIM 1.25% .5%
Income 1,250,000 500,000
Capital 8 million 1.6 millionROE 15.6% 31.25%
84
4. Funds Management
85
Funds management is concerned with funding assets and managing liquidity risk
Cost of funds
Diversified sources of funds
Diversified tenors
Asset Sales
Roll over risk
Capital planning
86
What is Liquidity Risk?
The volatility in income or economic capital of the bank due to an inability to meet cash
needs for payments/withdrawals or to support credit demands and growth in a
timely and cost-effective manner.
87
What Does Liquidity Mean?
Liquidity is a bank’s ability to meet all cash demands (withdrawing deposits, borrowing money, operational demands, etc.) anytime and entirely at a reasonable cost
It is notCash or other types of assets
A ratio
Earnings of a bank
88
Liquidity Risk: Deposit withdrawals and roll-over risk
Composition of liabilities and sensitivity to changes in interest rates and credit rating
Funding from money traders, public institutions, foreign investors, and large corporations
Large funding held by any single group or individual
Seasonal or cyclical patternsThe higher the asset quality and the greater the liquidity ... the better a bank’s perceived creditworthiness… and access to refinancing sources at reasonable prices
The higher the asset quality and the greater the liquidity ... the better a bank’s perceived creditworthiness… and access to refinancing sources at reasonable prices
BUT
89
Liquidity Risk: Asset Growth
Unused credit lines outstanding
Business activity in bank’s trade area
Demographic changes in market
Aggressiveness of marketing efforts--strategies to expand market share and pricing decisions
Funding under letters of credit and bank guarantees
90
There is a trade-off between liquidity vs. profitability
Cash holdings provide no interest incomeShort-term securities normally carry lower yieldsShort-term loans normally carry lower ratesLess liquid assets provide more income
91
But…
The better the quality assets and the greater the liquidity the better a bank’s perceived creditworthiness and access to refinancing sources at reasonable prices
A bank’s liquidity risk closely follows its credit, capital and interest rate risk
Bank’s large deposit outflow often traced to credit problems or interest rate gambles that failed
92
Liquidity risk is identified by maturity gapsAssets O/N 2-30 days 31-90 91-180 181-360 Over Total
Cash 35 35Interbank loans 97 70 43 210Investments 118 257 100 108 219 802Loans 62 158 275 288 102 885REPOs 4 126 77 105 312Other assets 20 194 30 131 375
Total 218 666 639 205 396 495 2619Liabilities
Deposits 327 327Notes 20 75 101 31 14 241Interbank Loans 214 89 183 153 71 4 714Debentures 43 391 187 151 772
Other 85 46 16 147Capital 102 102Total 689 601 471 184 236 122 2303
GAP (A-L) -471 65 168 21 160 373Cumulative GAP -471 -406 -238 -217 -57GAP Ratio(A/L) 0.32 0.69 0.86 0.89 0.97 1.14
Limits Board Limits Actual30 day Assets/overnight liabilities > .7 1.2890 day Assets/overnight liabilities >1 2.2190 day Assets/90 day liabilities >=1 0.86
Liquidity risk is identified by maturity gaps
93
The key to liquidity risk management is planning
To guarantee permanent liquidity, the Liquidity Plan has to accurately project all cash flows
However, the longer the planning horizon, the more inaccurate the cash flow prediction
Need for good data bases and communication systems to estimate future cash flows based on historical behaviorPlan should include worst case scenario
94
Examples of Asset Liquidity
Cash and due from banks in excess of required reserves or compensating balances
Federal funds sold and repurchase agreements
Government securities that mature within one year
Loans that can be readily sold or “securitized”
Collateral for borrowings
95
Concerns with Asset Liquidity
Some assets cannot be sold because they are already pledged as collateral
Market risk
Target loan to deposit ratio
Loans are among the least liquid assets
Deposits represent the primary source of fund
High (low) ratio indicates illiquidity (strong liquidity)
96
There are measures of liquidity that indicate borrowing capacity
Equity to asset ratio ( “well capitalized” )
Risk assets to total assets
Loan losses to net loans
Reserve for loan losses to non-performing loans
Core deposits to total assetsVolatile (purchased) liabilities to liquid assets
Composition of deposits (diversified customer base)
Market access
97
Liquidity risk management is a daily responsibility
Monitor balance sheet trends
Forecast funding needs
Identify alternative sources of funds
Asset liquidity vs liability liquidity
Stress testing
Peer analysis
98
Liquidity Risk Monitoring: Minimum MIS/Reports
Liquidity gap limits
Sources of funds
Maturity distribution
Volatile funds dependency
Stress testing using assumptions of funding attrition
Contingency plan
99
Liquidity risk management is a continuous process
.Quantity of Risk
Identify:What kind of risks?Where do they exist in our bank?How much risk?
Quality of Liquidity Risk Management
Determine:How diversified are our sources of funds –assets and liabilities?
Strategies for Managing Risk
Assure:That plans are sufficient to avert funding crises and to gain a fair return for liquid assets
Monitor Risks
Continue:Regular, ongoing evaluation of quantity and quality of liquidity and management practices
100
Liquidity Risk Identification
AssetsO/N 2-30 31-180 181-360 Over Total
Cash 35 35
Interbank 220 70 43 333
Securities 118 357 108 219 802
Investments 60 36 96
Loans 62 158 275 288 102 885
Other 24 330 107 131 687
Total 341 726 880 396 495 2838
101
Liquidity Risk Identification
LiabilitiesO/N 2-30 31-180 181-360 Over Total
Deposits 327 327
Interbank 33 33
Term Deposits 4 109 233 142 14 502
Notes 20 75 132 14 241
Other Borrow. 257 480 523 222 4 1486
Other 85 46 107 118 249
Total 726 710 888 378 136 2838
102
Liquidity Risk Identification
Net Liquidity Gap
O/N 2-30 31-180 181-360 Over Total
Assets 341 726 880 396 495 2838
Liabilities 726 710 888 378 136 2838
Gap(A-L) -385 16 -8 18 359
Cumulative -385 -369 -377 -359
103
Short-Term Liquidity Plan
0. Initial Liquid Assets1. Inflows
1.1 Certain cash inflows1.2 Uncertain cash inflows
2. Outflows2.1 Certain outflows2.2 Uncertain outflows
3. Assets - Level 1 (= 0. + 1. - 2.)4. Minimum required reserves
4.1 Required reserves at Central Bank4.2 Required internal reserves
5. Excess or Gap (=3. - 4.)6. Used sources7. Funds - Level 11 (=5. + 6.)
8. Funding sources6. Used sources9. Potential funding sources (= 8. - 6.)4.2 Required internal reserves10. Excess Potential Funding Sources (9. +4.2.)
Liquidity Plan from .... to .... TDM ExpectedAmount
WorstCase
104
5. Interest Rate Risk Management
105
What happens if interest rates increase/decrease?
Assume gap in previous exercise reflects repricing schedules
Interest rate risk occurs because interest rates change, and there is a yield curve
Net Liquidity Gap
O/N 2-30 31-180 181-360 Over Total
Assets 341 726 880 396 495 2838
Liabilities 726 710 401 378 136 2838
Gap(A-L) -385 16 -8 18 359
Cumulative -385 -369 -377 -359
The Yield Curve – Positively Sloped--Normal
Generally implies:Growing economyModerate Central Bank policyExpectation of some future rate increases
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
8
3 6 12 24 36 60 120 360
Maturity (in months)
Inte
rest
Rat
es
The Yield Curve – Positively Sloped-Steep
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
8
3 6 12 24 36 60 120 360Maturity (in months)
Inte
rest
Rat
es
Generally implies:Economy rebounding from recession Easy Central Bank policyExpectation of significant future rate increases
The Yield Curve – A Flat Yield Curve
22.5
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
8
3 6 12 24 36 60 120 360Maturity (in months)
Inte
rest
Rat
es
Generally implies:High growth economyCB tightening to reduce growth and inflationExpectation of falling future rates
The Yield Curve – Inverted Yield Curve
66.5
77.5
88.5
99.510
10.511
11.512
12.5
3 12 36 120
Inte
rest
Rat
esGenerally implies:Unsustainably high growth economyAggressive Central Bank tighteningExpectation of significantly lower future rates
Maturity (in months)
Relative interest rates reflect a risk-reward tradeoff
CompoundingBenefit of compounding available in shorter maturities must be incorporated in the rate for longer maturities
Liquidity Price RiskInvestors will accept a lower yield over time to have access to their money more often
Credit RiskLonger the maturity of a loan, the higher the uncertainty as to the borrower’s ability to repay the debtInvestors believe that the risk of a company defaulting on its debt grows over time
The Yield Curve - Credit Differences
33.5
44.5
55.5
66.5
77.5
88.5
9
3 6 12 24 36 60 120 360
Maturity (in months)
Inte
rest
Rat
es
US TreasuryA Rated
112
What is interest rate risk?
The volatility in earnings or economic capital of the bank due to a change in the level of
interest rates, interest rate spreads or shifts in the yield curve.
113
Volatility in earnings or economic capital are inversely related
Changes in market rates cause a change in interest income and expense of the portfolio
Changes in market rates cause a change in the opposite direction in market value of assets and liabilities
Increase in asset values mean reinvestment of funds at lower rates
Interest income is lowerMaturing values must be reinvestedAsset sales look good, but future income could be lower
114
Examples of interest rate risk on earnings
Earnings are affected if assets and liabilities have different interest
ases if the variable rate
rate sensitivity.
§Example: 10 million loan @ 8% fixed for one year10 million 3-month deposit at variable rate currently 4%
§Interest margin of 4% or 400,000 decreincreases during the year.
115
Examples of interest rate risk on EVE
Capital or EVE is affected if fixed rate assets are marked-to-market and interest rates change.
§Example: 10 million 6% due 2006 currently selling at par (ie., market yield is 6%)
§If interest rates increase 1% (100 basis points), the market value of the bond decreases to 9.59 million for a loss of 410,000.
116
Interest Rate Risk is identified by gaps
GAP = Rate Sensitive Assets - Rate Sensitive Liabilities
Assets which reprice in a given time period if interest rates change
–maturing assets–principal payments on assets
–variable rate assets
Rate Sensitive Assets
Liabilities which reprice in a given time period if interest rates change
–maturing liabilities–principal payments on liabilities
–variable rate liabilities
Rate Sensitive Liabilities
117
Positive Gap exists when sensitive assets exceed sensitive liabilities
Example
(RSA) Assets = 400,000(RSL) Liabilities = 350,000Repricing Gap = 50,000
If interest rates rise, more assets will reprice than liabilities. Therefore, expect interest income to increase in the short run more quickly than interest expense.
If rates fall, the reverse will occur. Therefore, when rates rise, expect profits to rise; and when rates fall, expect profits to fall.
118
Negative Gap exists when sensitive assets are less than sensitive liabilities
Example
(RSA) Assets = 350,000(RSL) Liabilities = 400,000Funding Gap = -50,000
If interest rates rise, more liabilities will reprice than f assets. Therefore, expect interest expense to increase in the short run more quickly than interest income.
If rates fall, the reverse will occur. Therefore, when rates rise, expect profits to fall; and when rates fall, expect profits to rise.
119
Interest Mismatch Ladder
PERIOD TO MATURITYOR ROLLOVER DATE
LIABILITIES ASSETS MISMATCH
Non-interest bearing
Up to 1 month1-3 months3-6 months
An analysis of the mismatches (gaps) between assets and liabilities at each value date will show the bank’s exposure to both liquidity risk (i.e., the risk of being unable to raise funds to meet payment obligations at a future date) and interest risk.
(1,500)-18,000
9,00022,000
(1,500)
(9,600)(18,000)
(17,000) 1,000(600)
4,000
120
Interest Rate Risk Measurement: Exercise
Measuring the impact of different % of Rate Sensitive Assetson Interest Revenue With an Increase in the General Level of Interest Rates
Earning Assets(000)
15,50915,50915,509
Interest Revenue
Beginning After increase
129,241 155,091129,241 142,166129,241 135,704
% Change
20%10%5%
% of AssetsRepriced
1005025
Rate Sensitive (%)
General Level of Interest Rates
Beginning(%)
After increase(%)
Change(%)
10 12 2010 12 2010 12 20
Measuring the impact of different % of Rate Sensitive Liabilitieson Interest Expense With an Increase in the General Level of Interest Rates
General Level of Interest Rates Liabilities(000)
10 12 2010 12 2010 12 20
14,01114,01114,011
Beginning(%)
After increase(%)
Change(%)
1005025
% of LiabilitiesRepriced
Rate Sensitive (%)
Interest Expense
Beginning % Change
116,758 140,110 20%116,758 128,434 10%116,758 122,596 5%
After increase
121
Interest Rate Risk Measurement: Exercise
Beginning Level of Rates (Base Case)
Interest Income 129,241Interest Expense 116,758Net Interest Income 12,483
Interest Rates Increase 20% RSA 50% RSA 100%RSL 100% RSL 50%
Interest Income 142,166 155,091Interest Expense 140,110 128,434Net Interest Income 2,056 26,657Change from Base (85)% 114%
Interest Rates Decrease 20% RSA 50% RSA 100%RSL 100% RSL 50%
Interest Income ________ _______Interest Expense ________ _______Net Interest Income ________ _______Change from Base ____% ____%
122
Losing Money with Gap StrategiesConsider the following maturity/rate structure
Interest Rates
1-year maturity
2-year maturity
3-year maturity
Assets:Loans
8.5%
9.5%
10.5%
Liabilities:Deposits
5.5%
6.5%
7.5%
Interest rates are expected to increase in the futureAppropriate Gap strategy for a rising rate environment
Hold positive GapInvest in short-term assetsFund with long-term liabilities
123
Losing Money with Gap Strategies
Suppose rates do increaseOne-year rates one year from now have increased 1.5%One-year rates two years from now have increased another 1%, or 2.5% higher than current ratesAssume that the yield curves for assets and liabilities increase by equal amounts
Calculate the three-year income performance for this bank for a strategy of a positive Gap.
124
What is the performance with a zero Gap or negative Gap?
StrategyInterestIncome
InterestExpense
Net InterestIncome
Zero Gap:(1-yr assets &1-yr liabilities) ____.__ ____.__
____.______.__
Negative Gap:(3-yr assets &1-yr liabilities)
____.__
____.__
125
Duration is a common measure of interest rate risk from a capital perspective
10%, 2 year
Zero Coupon, 2 year
0
+3.90
+3.63
-3.46
-3.72
8.0 10.0 12.0 Required Yield (Percent)
Market Rate8.0%10.0%12.0%
Price of 10% Bonds$1,036.30
1,000.00965.36
Price of Zero Coupon$854.80822.70792.09
Change in Pricefrom Initial
Price at 10%Interest Rate
(Percent)
126
Simulation is used to test IRR limitsRate Shock Exposure
Net Interest Income Current Market Value Change in
Rates (b.p.) Estimated
Value Change
From Base % Change from Base
Estimated Value
Change From Base
% Change from Base
+ 400 6,155 476 8.4 10,812 (2,875) (21.0)
+ 200 5,969 290 5.1 12,741 (946) (6.9)
Base 5,679 0 0.0 13,686 0 0.0
-200 5,401 (278) (4.9) 14,565 879 6.4
-400 4,978 (701) (12.3) 16,426 2,740 20.0
Rate Cycle Exposure
Net Interest Income Current Market Value Y/Curve
Type Estimated
Value Change
From Base % Change from Base
Estimated Value
Change From Base
% Change from Base
Fully Inverted
7,111 1,414 24.8 9,409 (4,277) (31.3)
Semi Inverted
6,641 944 16.6 11,052 (2,634) (19.2)
Flattening 5,762 65 1.1 13,237 (449) (3.3)
Base 5,697 0 0.0 13,686 0 0.0
Steepening 5,148 (549) (9.6) 14,790 1,103 8.1
Rate Forecast Exposure
Net Interest Income Current Market Value Change in
Rates (b.p.) Estimated
Value Change
From Base % Change from Base
Estimated Value
Change From Base
% Change from Base
Rising 5,829 129 2.3 17,102 (1,043) (5.7)
Most Likely 5,691 (9) (0.2) 18,461 316 1.7
Base 5,700 0 0.0 18,145 0 0.0
Declining 5,536 (164) (2.9) 19,412 1,267 7.0
127
Interest rate risk management has evolved…
Stage 2 Create history of rates and data base
STATIC GAPANALYSIS Stage 1 Develop Gap analysis - basic approach
DYNAMIC GAPANALYSIS
SIMULATIONMODELING
VALUE ATRISK
ANALYSIS
HISTORY OFRATE
VOLATILITYDATA BASESUPPORT
DETERMINERISK
TOLERANCE
SET TRADING LIMITS
DETERMINEBALANCE SHEET
TARGETS
Stage 3 Create modelsand begin VaR analysis
State 4 Utilize all of the tools to manage limits and balance sheet
128
Interest Risk Management: Difficulties
Forecast the direction and magnitude of interest rate changes
GAP measures do not accurately indicate interest rate and do not recognize the timing differences in cash flows for assets and liabilities within the same maturity groupings
Duration is a good measure only for small changes in interest rates
What is ideal for the customers is not ideal for the bank
129
Interest Rate Risk Management: Monitoring of MIS/Reports
Asset yields, liability costs
NIM, variances from prior period and budget
Longer term interest margin trends
Rate sensitivity position
Static and dynamic gap
Exceptions to policy guidelinesABC DEF GHI JKL MNO
19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
ABC DEF GHI JKL MNO19 14 33 22 130 18 42 26 2449 32 75 48 2519 14 33 22 111 4 9 4 235 4 4 4 5
133 86 196 126 79
19 14 33 22 1
130
6. Foreign Exchange Risk Management
131
What is foreign currency risk?
The volatility in income or economic value of equity due to movements in foreign currency
exchange rates
The volatility in income or economic value of equity due to movements in foreign currency
exchange rates
132
Foreign currency risk arises from movements in exchange rates
Cash Market
Derivative Market
Forwardrate
Spotrate
Transaction Translation
Economic
FX risk comes in two forms
Translation risk:
Balance sheet assets and liabilities translated at FX rate prevailing on date of the balance sheet. Income statements translated at an average FX rate prevailing over the measurement period
Measures impact of a change in exchange rates on a company’s financial statements
Transaction risk:
Potential gains or losses on future settlements of outstanding obligations denominated in a foreign currency, ie., booked sales may be paid in different actual amounts
Measures impact of a change in exchange rates on actual collections (the difference between receivables and payables)
Like interest rates, risk arises from a mismatch of assets and liabilities
ASSETS LIABILITIES
Foreigncurrencyappreciates
Foreigncurrencydepreciates
gain loss
gainloss
What is an institution’s FX Position
The Balance Sheet position in a particular currency is a function of total assets and total liabilities in that currency
When assets in a currency exceed liabilities in that currency, there is a long (or overbought) position in the currency
When liabilities in a currency exceed assets in that currency, there is a short (or oversold) position in the currency
FX position can be determined by analyzing the balance sheet
The total of :(A) FX Assets + contingent FX bought Less(B) FX Liabilities + contingent FX sold
Equals the Foreign Exchange Position
137
FX exposure is identified in the banking and the trading book by open positions
Foreign Currency Risk
RMB $US JPY GBP EuroBanking Assets 808688 3863 30000 200 28
Banking Liabilites 754088 3692 66 200 45000
On-balance sheet position 54600 171 29934 0 -44972
Off-balance sheet position -4568 230000
Net exposure 54600 -4397 29934 0 185028
Exchange Rate 8.17 0.067 11.753 7.242
RMB Equivalent (millions) -35923 2006 0 1339973
The FX position includes the Forward Position
Forward contracts represent the obligations to purchase or sell a specific amount of a currency at a specific future date
When a bank dealer executes a forward FX deal, the bank's actual assets and liabilities in the deal currencies do not change until the deal is settled on the specified date (typically in 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 or 12 months)
What is the exposure effect?
A Chinese company sells hospital diagnostic equipment. Most of its revenues are in China, but about half its expenses are in EUR, because the company buys many components abroad. Its primary competition is from Chinese companies with no international business at all.
How will a strengthening of the EUR affect this company?
Another example: Japanese TVs
A Japanese firm sells television sets to an American importer for JPY 1 billion payable in 90 days.
What is the importer’s risk?
How should the importer protect against it?
FX risk is measured like interest rate risk
Foreign exchange gap analysis
Foreign exchange duration analysis
Foreign exchange rate simulation
Rate volatility analysis
142
FX risk is managed with effective policies
Objectives and principles of FX risk management
Measurement of risk
Risk exposure limits
Net open position limits
Currency position limits
Other position limits
Stop-loss provisions
Concentration limits
Revaluation procedures
FX risk management tools are available in some markets
Contractual hedgesForwardsMoneyFuturesOptions
Natural hedgesPayment leads and lagsMatching
Forward exchange rates are derived from relative interest rates
The spot USD/CHF rate is 1.40. Six month interest rates are 6% on the dollar and 4% on the Swiss Franc. (The six month interest period is 184 days.)An organization with USD 1 million and a requirement for Swiss Francs in six months should be indifferent, financially speaking, as to whether it:
Invests the USD 1 million for six months and converts the dollars (plus interest) into CHF at the end of this timeSells the USD 1 million spot for CHF, and invests the CHF for six months until they are needed
Derivation of Forward Exchange Rates
Invest USD 1 million at 6%for 6 months (184 days)
Interest earned USD30,666.67
Value after 6 monthsUSD 1,030,666.67
Sell USD 1 million spot at 1.40Buy CHF 1.4 million
Invest CHF for 6 months at 4%
Interest earned CHF28,622.22
(1.4 million x 4% x 184/360)
Value after 6 monthsCHF 1,428,622.22
OPTION 1 OPTION 2
Exchange Rate: 1.3861
146
Value at risk (VaR) is a common market risk measure
0
Tail Probability = 2.5%
“Value at Risk”
Position size
Value sensitivity to price movements
Probability distribution of price movements
CapturesCaptures
Daily Changes in Position Value
The historical volatility of exchange rates determines the risk
Aug
-87
Jan-
88Ju
l-88
Dec
-88
Jun-
89N
ov-8
9M
ay-9
0O
ct-9
0A
pr-9
1S
ep-9
1M
ar-9
2A
ug-9
2Fe
b-93
Jul-9
3Ja
n-94
Jun-
94D
ec-9
4M
ay-9
5N
ov-9
5M
ay-9
6O
ct-9
6A
pr-9
7
-0.1
-0.05
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2R
ate
of R
etur
n (%
)
Aug
-87
Jan-
88Ju
l-88
Dec
-88
Jun-
89N
ov-8
9M
ay-9
0O
ct-9
0A
pr-9
1S
ep-9
1M
ar-9
2A
ug-9
2Fe
b-93
Jul-9
3Ja
n-94
Jun-
94D
ec-9
4M
ay-9
5N
ov-9
5M
ay-9
6O
ct-9
6A
pr-9
7
£/$ RETURNS
The returns can then be plotted in a histogram
DM/$ RETURNSHISTOGRAM
Price Change (%)
Frequency
£/$ RETURNS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
-5.43% -3.46% -1.48% 0.49% 2.47% 4.45% 6.42% 8.40% More
Price Change (%)
Frequency
The greater the number of observations, the more normal the distribution
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4Change in Portfolio Value
StandardDeviation
2.5% of Distribution
The standard deviation is a measure of dispersion
Assume an asset returns the following over three periods:10% 15% 20%
What is the standard deviation/volatility?
(10% - 15%)2 + (15% - 15%)2 + (20% - 15%) 2 = 5%2
The number of standard deviations varies depending on how sure you want to be
How much we can expect to lose over a given period of time at a certain confidence level?
VaR = Position in Portfolio (i.e., $100) * Volatility (i.e., standard deviation) * No. of Standard Deviations specified(i.e., 95% = 2)
Note: The 95% confidence is for a +/- 2 standard deviations. For a one-tailed test (- 2 standard deviations), we are 97.5% (or rounding 98%) confident.
An example of VAR
Assume:• Monthly Volatility of $/Sterling is 3.3%• Current Spot Rate = $1.6/Sterling• Current Position = GBP 10 Million
The most we can lose over the next month with 98% confidence is 10*1.6*3.3*2 is $1,056,000
Exercise
AssumeMonthly volatility of $/EUR is 2%Current spot rate = .9 EUR/$Current position = EUR 20 million
What is the most we can lose in $’s over the next month with 98% confidence?What is the most we can lose in $’s over the next month with 99% confidence?
VaR can be calculated for individual asset or portfolio of assets
JPMorganChase’s RiskMetricsNon-simulation variance/covariance approachUses daily volatility and correlation estimatesSystem implementation from 3rd parties
Historical simulationPortfolio aggregationMonte Carlo simulation
155
The best VaR models use a combination of methods
Historical SimulationHistorical Simulation
Parametric VARParametric VAR
Normal distribution assumption
Easy to calculate
No event risk capabilities
No compensation for “fat tails”
No ability to fully calculate non-linear instruments
Normal distribution assumption
Easy to calculate
No event risk capabilities
No compensation for “fat tails”
No ability to fully calculate non-linear instruments
Monte Carlo Simulation
Monte Carlo Simulation
Can simulate many price paths
Limits model risk
Accounts for non-linearity and non-normality
Computationally expensive
Can simulate many price paths
Limits model risk
Accounts for non-linearity and non-normality
Computationally expensive
Can test current portfolio over past periods (even crash conditions)
Relies on the existence of historical price series
Incorporates non-linearities and non-normal distributions
Doesn’t necessarily reflect future conditions
Can test current portfolio over past periods (even crash conditions)
Relies on the existence of historical price series
Incorporates non-linearities and non-normal distributions
Doesn’t necessarily reflect future conditions
156
Jan-Peter Onstwedder, The Royal Bank of Scotland
Judgment still must be applied to the VaR process of setting limits and watching or forecasting changing economic conditions. Changes in fundamental economic conditions (even less dramatic than the 1991 events in Eastern Europe) can cause losses that exceed the levels of risk tolerance—such as the unwinding of the Asian economies and its impact on the securities of developing economies. VaR is a valuable tool because it attempts to quantify a process that would otherwise be purely judgmental. It should be used along with interest sensitivity dynamic Gap analysis.
157
7. Credit Risk Management
158
What is credit risk?
The volatility in income or economic value of equity due to movements in foreign currency
exchange rates
The volatility in income or economic value of equity due to non-performance by a debtor
or counter-party
159
That means a number of things
“The risk that a borrower will not pay what was lent – in full and on time”
The potential that a bank borrower or counterparty will fail to meet its obligations in accordance with agreed terms
“Principles for the Management of Credit Risk” - BIS 1999
Must also include all threats to value, in a probability / net present value sense; e.g. deterioration in quality throughout the life of the loan is a credit risk in itself
160
Credit risk is typically the greatest threat to capital health in the banking business
ROE
plus
less
less
less
Net Int. Income
Other income
Op. Expense
Provisions
Tax
Credit risk
Int. Income
Int. Expense
161
Successful credit risk is a competitive advantage
Identify
Measure
Monitor
Control
And price appropriately!
162
There are two major factors to consider with as much confidence as possible
What is the likelihood a borrower will default?
Probability [%]
If the borrower defaults, how much are we likely to lose?
Amount [$ / € / $ or %]
163
Credit analysis, ratings, pricing and controls focus on these two factors
What is the likelihood a borrower will default?
Probability [%]
If the borrower defaults, how much are we likely to lose?
Amount [$ / € / $ or %]
What is the likelihood a borrower will default?
• Financial strength• Management quality• Market and economy• Other factors
Likelihood that cash flow will sustain through life of credit:
• Exposure at default• Compromised financial strength• Guarantees or security• Other factors
Value of distressed credit:
If the borrower defaults, how much are we likely to lose?
164
Credit risk affects both capital and earnings
The primary objective is to minimize the volatility of earnings and capital (hence the risk as perceived by investors) and at the same time earn a ROE to maintain the value of the common equity.
Foregone Interest and provisions
And mark-to-market losses
Losses in economic capital
165
Financial success in any enterprise means – at the least – breaking even
Breakeven
Manufacturer nOther costs
Operating Costs
Cost of Goods Sold
Profit
How is a Financial Institution different
from a manufacturer?
166
For a financial institution, this means effectively managing credit risks . . .
Profit
Why we need capital
Margin forExpected
Credit Losses
Reserves forUnexpected
Losses
Operating Costs
Financial Institution “Predictable” losses that
can be built into pricing
Losses resulting from volatility – “true” risk
Cost of Funds
167
Credit risk measurement takes different forms
Expert systems
Credit scoring models
Rating systemsCAMELS
Pass, OLEM, Substandard, Doubtful, Loss
Public bond ratings
168
Credit analysis drives the credit risk assessment of all methods
Both the ability and the willingness to pay are key
169
There are several indicators of future ability and willingness to pay
Past record of meeting debt payments, particularly in stress situation like a recession
Proven record of careful financial management
Adequate financial reserves or other liquid assets
Fiscal flexibility ….or the ability toRaise funds or sell assetsAccess bank lines on short noticeDraw on cash reservesCut discretionary spendingAlter the business plan or delay capital expenditures
170
Credit risk analysis is an evolving field using basic quantitative methods
Basic algebraEquations define relationship among variablesSolving 2 unknowns with 2 equationsExpected value
Present value vs future valueOpportunity cost of $ todayInverse relationship between rates and prices
StatisticsVariables describing a sampleMeasures of central tendency (Median, mean and mode)Measures of dispersion (Range and std deviation)Regression analysis and correlation
171
There are two basic aspects of credit risk
Standalone risksDefault probability Loss given defaultMigration risk
Portfolio risksDefault correlationsExposure
Credit risk management means diversifying and transferring risk
172
Standalone creditworthiness depends on many factors
Indu
stry
sec
tor
Com
petit
ive
posi
tion
Fina
ncia
l str
engt
h
Cas
h flo
w/ d
ebt s
erv.
Mgm
t. / o
rgan
izat
ion
173
Data drives the credit analysis
SAMPLE DATA COLLECTIONexamples
Category
Industry
FinancialCondition
¨ Industry profile -- 3 yearsà Size, growthà Concentrationsà Cyclicality/seasonalityà Explanation of trends
¨ Industry outlook¨ Profiles of key competitors (top two)¨ Regulatory profile -- current, recent changes,
expected changes¨ Borrower’s strategy¨ Key alliances:
à With government à With private sectorà With other influential players
¨ Company financials -- 3 yearsà Profit & loss statements, balance
sheetsà Supplementary statements --
reconciliation of net worth, fixed assets\à Audited where possible
¨ Creditor facilitiesà Banksà Suppliers
Data Required Data Sources
¨ Internalà Filesà Research departmentà Other managers familiar with industry
¨ Third partiesà Ministriesà Multilateral agencies -- World Bank,
IADB, etc.à Other government organizationsà Trade associationsà Other banksà Other companies in industries
¨ External -- customer calls¨ Business press
¨ Internalà Filesà Other managers familiar with borrower
¨ Issuerà In person callsà Site visits
amounts and condition of facilities
174
Financial ratio analysis provides the basis for ability to pay
RATIOSRATIOS
Liquidity (Cash/Current Liabilities)
Cashflow-Measures (Repayment) (e.g. CF/interest, CF/liabilities)
Profitability (e.g. pre-tax profit/assets)
Activity (e.g. Revenues/Assets)
Leverage (e.g. equity/liabilities)
Size (e.g. Sales)
Growth (e.g. Revenue growth)
SELECTIONSELECTION
Financial statements relevant (even) in emerging economies
Depending on maturity of economy and reporting systems different factors are dominant
Liquidity and Cashflow measures likely to dominate a rating
Precise definition of factor will depend on consistent availability of data
Need to test numerous ratios given sufficient data
175
Both quantitative and qualitative analyses are required
Financial factorsFinancial factors Non-financial factors
Non-financial factors
Warning signals /Behavioral factorsWarning signals /Behavioral factors
Financial ratingFinancial rating Warning signal ratingWarning signal ratingNon-financial ratingNon-financial rating
Issurer ratingIssurer rating
176
Their relative importance typically varies according to the issuer segment
- ILLUSTRATIVE -FACTOR WEIGHTS
Financial Non-Financial Behavioural
Large Corporate
Small Business
• Profitability
• Leverage
• Growth
• Liquidity
• Mgt quality
• Industry outlook
• Insider transactions
• Evergreen loans
SIZE SEGMENT
177
Credit ratings are an assessment of management—a leading indicator
Management (not external conditions) drives performance
How cope in periods of rapid change
Attitudes toward risk, a focus on fundamentals
Corporate culture: how motivated and promoted
Collegial versus dictatorial decision making
Quality of management information systems
Realism of long-term strategies and goals
178
Ratios are tools in the rating process
Absolute and relative trendPeer group comparisonsNot the final step or whole answerRatios put you in the right neighborhood, but you need the right address Non-quantifiable (subjective) side of the analysis just as important as the numbers
179
A credit analysis is essentially a bottom-up pyramid analysis
AAA?Qualitative Analysis
-Management-Financial Flexibility
Quantitative Analysis-Financial Statements
-Past/Future PerformanceMarket Position
Competitive Trends (domestic/global)Regulatory Environment
Industry AnalysisSovereign Macroeconomic Analysis
180
BIS II has led to a new generation of statistical rating models
Capital required to support risk-weighted assets
Three measures for credit riskStandardized using external ratings for risk weights
IRB: Foundation and Advanced
IRB uses banks’ own rating systems with required features
Provisions should equal expected losses
Capital must be held for UL
181
Traditional credit risk measurement has not been discriminate
Not compensating for risk
Evolved to KMV Credit Monitor Model
Loans as options using Black-Scholes
JP Morgan’s CreditMetrics and other models
Risk neutral valuation approach
Differ in terms of definition of risk (MTM or DM); risk drivers; volatility and correlation of credit events; recovery rates; simulation or analytic
182
BIS II’s objective is to have same level of capital in the system as a whole
Source: Bank of England Spring Quarterly Report, 2001
183
Probability of Default (PD) is based on historical experience
X Corporate Loans
Y Credit Cards
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4StandardDeviation
X = 2%
Y = 4%
X = 4%
Y = 5%
184
Which loan type is more risky….X or Y?
X Corporate Loans
Y Credit Cards
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4StandardDeviation
X = 2%
Y = 4%
X = 4%
Y = 5%
185
Databases of historical defaults are maintained by international CRAs
S&P
Moody’s
Fitch
Dun & Bradstreet
Others
186
Default histories drive PD
S & P RATING MOODY’S EQUIVALENT
DEFAULT PROBABILITY (SUBSEQUENT YEAR)
AAA Aaa 0.01%
AA Aa3/A1 0.03% A As/A3 0.10%
BBB Baa2 0.30% BB Ba1/Ba2 0.81% B Ba3/B1 2.21%
CCC B2/B3 6.00% CC B3/Caa 11.68% C Caa/Ca 16.29%
187
Raw dataRaw data IndividualScores
IndividualScores
EconomicInterpretation
EconomicInterpretation
CalibratedRating (PD)Calibrated
Rating (PD)Aggregation tooverall Score
Aggregation tooverall Score
Input Calculation Output
• Financials• Assessment of
qualitative Factors
• Ratios • Scale comparable for all factors
• Weights fixed (e.g. linear algorithm)
• Calibration fixed
May be different by segment (size, state -owned /private, industry, available information)
Quantitative modeling provides the basis of the analysis
188
The oldest and simplest model is Altman’s Z Score
Overall profitability (ROA)
Sales to Total Assets
Leverage (Market Value of Equity to Debt)
Working Capital to Total Assets
Cumulative profitability (Retained earnings/Total Assets)
189
A Z score below 2.99 could be an early warning sign of default
RATIO FORMULA WEIGHT FACTOR WEIGHTED RATIO
Return on Total Assets Earnings Before Interest and
Taxes ----------------------------------------
- Total Assets
x. 3.3 -4 to +8.0
Sales to Total Assets Net Sales
-----------------------------------------
Total Assets x 0.999 -4 to +8.0
Equity to Debt Market Value of Equity
-----------------------------------------
Total Liabilities x 0.6 -4 to +8.0
Working Capital to Total Assets
Working Capital ----------------------------------------
- Total Assets
x 1.2 -4 to +8.0
Retained Earnings to Total Assets
Retained Earnings ----------------------------------------
- Total Assets
x1.4 -4 to +8.0
190
Hindsight is perfect….but how do we predict default
191
If we have the data, we can begin to generalize about a similar population
Example: Life insurance company
How we can we classify individuals into broad risk bands to manage our actuarial risk?
?
192
What would be a logical process for discerning the predictive risk variables?
Example: Life insurance company
Set hypothesis
Examine experience
Select variables
Test predictability
Test and Calibrate
• Age• Male / female• Smoker / non-smoker• Obesity• Family history
193
What would be a logical process for discerning the predictive risk variables?
Risk factor: ObesitySet
hypothesis
Examine experience
Select variables
Test predictability
Test and Calibrate
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
40 k 60 k 80 k 100 k 120 k 140 k 160 k 180 k
0
20
40
60
80
100
40 k 60 k 80 k 100 k 120 k 140 k 160 k 180 k
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
40 k 60 k 80 k 100 k 120 k 140 k 160 k 180 k
194
The larger the data population, and the more reliable the data, the more confident
195
… and the easier to test the predictability of our data points
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
196
The most reliable credit risk models are from consumer credit scoring models
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Example:Credit Cards
Examples of predictive factors for credit cards
197
Not surprisingly, for such credits, the models drive the whole credit process
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
• Planning• Marketing• Approval• Pricing• Monitoring• Collections• Provisioning
198
Design, integrity, maintenance, and validity of the model is the core
0
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100
20
40
60
80
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
199
Risk managers always try to evolve towards a “model” approach – if practical
ModelScoringTemplateJudgment
200
But by their nature, different risks lend themselves to different levels of prototyping
Judgment Template Scoring Model
Large unique risks, small populations, variable characteristics
Medium-sized risks, average populations, predictable characteristics
Small individual risk, large populations, homogenous characteristics
Large corporates, sovereigns, banks, project finance
Small business, high-end consumer, homogenous commercial
Credit cards, home mortgages, car and student loans
201
If we can predict our potential losses we can price them in our rates
Expected loss = ?
How much we expect to lose (probability) on a credit or group of credits
May be expressed as a per cent or an absolute number
Often abbreviated as “EL” – also known as “ROL” (risk of loss)
202
Let’s calculate a simple example
Expected loss
Probability of default
Loss given default
Exposure at defaultx x=
1 0.012 0.033 0.054 0.255 0.706 1.507 6.008 20.09 50.0
10 100.0
Rating PD %
0
10
25
50
75
100
LGD %
100
EaD %
203
In per cent…
Expected loss
Probability of default
Loss given default
Exposure at default= x x.03 or 3% .06 .50 1.00= x x
1 0.012 0.033 0.054 0.255 0.706 1.507 6.008 20.09 50.0
10 100.0
Rating PD %
0
10
25
50
75
100
LGD %
100
EaD %So if the credit is $ 7,000, EL for that credit is $ 210 (3% x $ 7,000)
204
… or in numbers
3% .06 .50 1.00$ 210 .06 .50 $ 7,000= x x
1 0.012 0.033 0.054 0.255 0.706 1.507 6.008 20.09 50.0
10 100.0
Rating PD %
0
10
25
50
75
100
LGD %
100
EaD %
205
Expected loss is a function of three variables
Probability of default
Loss given default
Expected loss
Exposure at default
x x=
206
The standalone EL’s can be aggregated for for the whole portfolio
Losses
Probability
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
207
Active portfolio management has become best practice
Modern portfolio theory used to reduce risk
Based on Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)Specific risks of different assets can be diversified in a
portfolio
Market or systematic risk cannot be diversified
Required return = Rf + β(Market return – Rf)
208
Portfolios are managed to maximize returns at a given level of risk
The variance-covariance of different assets reduce the portfolio variance
Relatively riskier assets, depending on correlation with portfolio, can be added to portfolio and reduce the aggregate variance
Marginal risk may be additive
But may be less than standalone risk
Returns on the portfolio can be enhanced
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
209
Over time actual can be compared to expected losses
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
?
Models must be recalibrated, back-tested and stress-tested
210
Models must be recalibrated, back-tested and stress-tested
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
010
20304050607080
90
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0
2 0
4 0
6 0
8 0
1 0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
How did we do? What should we change?How sensitive is the output to different assumptions?How does our risk change with worst case scenarios?
211
EL are “predictable” – UL losses (i.e. volatility) represent true risk
Expected Loss (EL)Expected Loss (EL)• Anticipated average loss
rate• Foreseeable “cost”• Charged through
income statement
• Anticipated average loss rate
• Foreseeable “cost”• Charged through
income statement
Unexpected Loss (UL)Unexpected Loss (UL)• Anticipated volatility of
loss rate• True “risk”• Captured through
assignment of capital
• Anticipated volatility of loss rate
• True “risk”• Captured through
assignment of capital
212
The greater the variance, the more capital required
Amount of Loss
Probability of Loss
Unexpected Loss (Standard Deviation)
Unexpected Loss Requires capital support - as a cushion
Mean “expected” Loss
213
The amount of capital depends on target debt rating
Required Capital
Mean “expected” Loss
AA AAA.003 .001
BBB A.03 .01
SolvencyStandard
Unexpected Loss( 1 Standard Deviation)
Uncovered RiskTotal “Economic” Capital = Reserves + Equity
214
In summary, credit analysis drives the PD but is only one component of risk
Credit Analysis and Structuring
Probability of Default
Expected Loss
Loss Given DefaultRisk Rating:
Borrower and Facility
Based on historical risk
rating data
A function of analysis andstructuring
Feedback process: annual review &
experience
EL=PD x LGD x EAD
Based on analysis & identified
comparative standards
Feedback loop
Exposure at Default
215
Credit risk analysis is an evolving field
Quantitative modeling includes structural and reduced form models
Credit risk management means diversifying and transferring risk
Research continues to integrate new asset classes and correlations
216
Over-reliance on models can be risky
Loan uniformity is a problem
Correlation analysis for loans is in its infancy and correlations change over time
The industry knows less than it thinks about actual loss probabilities and little of migration
Volatility measures are unstable and differ across time horizons
Operational risk increases
217
Daniel Mudge, Bankers Trust (from Risk Magazine, 1994)
I would prefer a C-rated model with weaknesses and have people with experience and intuition than an A-rated model with a C-rate team of people who are unable to question the numbers that the system generates.
218
8. Summary and Review
219
Before we discuss the final case let’s summarize some concepts
Overview of Risk and Risk Management
ALM Overview
Funds (Liquidity risk) Management
IRR Management
FX Risk Management
Credit Risk Management
220
Banks assume credit, liquidity, interest rate, FX and capital risks
Economic Sectors
Assets Liabilities
Demand Deposits
Businesses
Governments
Households
Time Deposits
Other Borrowings
Assets Loans, leases and Investments
Borrowings
221
Bank management must satisfy many stakeholders
Shareholders
Regulators/Rating Agencies Employees
Return
Loans/services
Safety/Soundness
Employment
Customers
222
Risk management is the key to success along with good governance practices
.Quantity of Risk
What kind of risks does the bank have?
Where do they exist?
How is risk measured?
Quality of Risk Management
Risk control processes
Risk appetite and limits
Strategies for Managing Risk
What are the policies?
Last reviewed?
Risk mitigation strategies?
Monitor Risks
How are exposures monitored?
What is role of the internal auditor?
223
We looked at risk and risk management
What is risk?
Managing the risk/reward tradeoff is the business of banking, particularly ALM
Risk management systemIdentificationMeasurementManagementMonitoring
Financial statements, annual plans and ALM strategies
224
Rational investors require a return commensurate with risk
Rate of ReturnRiskPremium
Risk FreeRate
Common Stock
Level of Risk
Treasury Bonds
First Mortgage Bonds
2nd Mortgage BondsSubordinated Debentures
Income BondsPreferred Stock
Conv. Preferred
AAAAA
ABBB
BB
B
CCC
Non-linear
225
ALM manages the non-credit financial risks
Liquidity riskLow-cost, predictable funding sourcesAsset vs Liability liquidityFinancial flexibility and optimal distribution/pricing of
securities
Interest rate riskGap and duration analysisCaR
FX riskLong and short positionsVaR
Capital riskPortfolio management
226
Credit worthiness plays an important role
Both the ability and the willingness to pay debt
obligations in full and on time
227
Both quantitative and qualitative analyses are inputs in the credit rating process
Financial factorsFinancial factors Non-financial factors
Non-financial factors
Warning signals /Behavioral factorsWarning signals /Behavioral factors
Financial inputFinancial input CreditWatches or outlook changes
CreditWatches or outlook changesNon-financial inputNon-financial input
Issuer ratingIssuer rating
228
Risk measurement determines how much capital is at risk
Capital represents net assets or shareholder ownershipCapital serves to absorb losses
Operating or financial lossesProtects other creditorsPermits growthEquity is the most costly source of capital
RAROC is used to allocate capital based on risk/reward trade-off
229
PD, LGD estimation and verification help determine capital at risk
BIS definition of default and loss given defaultExplanatory inputs
Company, sector/country or economic specificRelevant and logic
Data collection for model fittingModeling (Private, public)
Altman Z-score Merton model Most commercial PD models are variants of these
230
BIS II has led to a new generation of statistical rating models
Saying “don’t take too much risk”
is like saying “don’t swim too far from shore”
231
Successful risk management is an integrated process
Systems• Data extraction• Data transfer links• Data mapping• MIS support
Policies & Processes
• Approval• Limits / Control• Reports• Disclosure
Risk Management
Organization• Independence• Audit• Education• Performance Evaluation
Methodologies• Grading / Scoring
• Calculators
• Capital attribution
232
Let’s put all this in context with International Azeri Bank case
Break into groupsRead case facts and make assumptions as necessaryYou are a new member of ALCO and have been asked to provide an assessment of IZBAnalyze IZB’s performance and plansProvide critical observations Formulate recommendations to improve positioning of the bankMake any additional assumptions as necessary
233
Balance Sheet Analysis
BALANCE SHEET 2005 2004% Index % Base
AssetsCash 27552 3.0% 100 27494 3.4% 100Deposits at Banks 0.0% 0.0% 100Net Loans to Customers 684205 75.4% 118 578974 72.5% 100Interest in Joint Venture 0.0% 0.0% 100Trading 0.0% 0.0% 100Investments 151729 16.7% 99 152641 19.1% 100
0.0% 0 0 0.0% 100Premises 9470 1.0% 9673 1.2% 100Other Assets 34063 3.8% 0 29873 3.7% 100Total Assets 907019 100.0% 114 798655 100.0% 100
LiabilitiesDemand deposits 185862 20.5% 101 184844 23.1% 100Savings deposits 165502 18.2% 99 167247 20.9% 100Core Time 192100 21.2% 110 173892 21.8% 100Volatile time 109194 12.0% 132 82600 10.3% 100Total deposits 652658 72.0% 107 608583 76.2% 100Other liabilities 34998 3.9% 109 32055 4.0% 100Interbank borrowed 148823 16.4% 155 96155 12.0% 100Repos 30624 3.4% 150 20400 2.6% 100LTD 5000 0.6% 100 5000 0.6% 100Total Liabilities 872103 96.2% 114 762193 95.4% 100Stockholders' Equity 34916 3.8% 96 36462 4.6% 100Total Liabilities & NW 907019 100.0% 114 798655 100.0% 100
International Azeri Bank
234
Profit and Loss Statement 2005 2004% Index % Base
Interest Income 90684 267% 10.6% 71732 212% 100Interest Expense 57640 170% 6.8% 43644 129% 100Net Interest Income 33044 97% 3.9% 28088 83% 100Provision for credit losses 8056 24% 0.9% 6460 19% 100Net Interest after provision 24988 73% 2.9% 21628 64% 100Fee and commission income 960 3% 0.1% 5788 17% 100Fee and commission expense 0% 0.0% 0% 100Net Fees and commissions 960 3% 0.1% 5788 17% 100Trading Profits 0% 0.0% 0 0% 100Operating Leases 0% 0.0% 0% 100Other income 0% 0.0% 0% 100Total Non-interest Income 960 3% 0.1% 5788 17% 100Overhead 25592 75% 3.0% 25844 76% 100Pre-Tax Profit 356 1% 0.0% 1572 5% 100Taxation 0% 0.0% 628 2% 100Net Profit 356 1% 0.0% 944 3% 100
Average Assets* 852837 1562074Average Equity* 35689 109735Avg. Earning Assets* 793346 1336493Avg Interest Bearing Liabilities* 351728 1215379
ROA 0.04% 0.10%ROE 1.0% 1.4%Leverage 23.90 14.23Spread -0.79% 3.88%Net interest margin 4.2% 2.1%Other operating margin 0.11% 0.37%Efficiency Ratio 98.6% 94.3%Overhead/Avg assets 3.0% 1.7%Provisions/Avg Assets 0.9% 0.4%Yield on EA 15.6% 7.5%Cost of Funds 16.4% 3.6%EA Ratio 93.0% 85.6%Capital Ratio 3.8% 4.6%Loans/Deposits 104.8% 95.1%
Income Statements
Profitability Analysis
235
Thank you for your attention!
236
Funds Management
for
Financial Institutions
Additional ExamplesFebruary 8-10, 2006
237
Net interest income is usually the most predicable source of earnings
Cost ofInterest-paying
Liabilities
Net Interest Spread
Gain (Loss)
Net InterestMargin on EarningAssets
Earning AssetsTotal Assets
(x)Earning Assets -Interest BearingLiabilities
Cost ofInterest-payingLiabilities
Interest Yield onEarning Assets
(-)
(+/-)
(x)
NIM
238
Examples of Calculation of Gains/LossesI Income Expense NII NIM
Earning Assets 100 10% 10 4.5 5.5 5.5%Interest-bearing Liabilities 90 5%Spread 10 5% 0.5 5.5%
I Income Expense NII NIMEarning Assets 100 10% 10 6 4.0 4.0%Interest-bearing Liabilities 120 5%Spread -20 5% -1 4.0%
I Income Expense NII NIMEarning Assets 200 10% 20 5 15.0 7.5%Interest-bearing Liabilities 100 5%Spread 100 5% 2.5 7.5%
I Income Expense NII NIMEarning Assets 350 10% 35 20 15.0 4.3%Interest-bearing Liabilities 400 5%Spread -50 5% -0.714 4.286%
It is the relative proportion of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities
239
Liquidity Planning: Gap Analysis 0-30 Days 31-90 Days 91-365 Days Potential Uses of Funds Add: Maturing time deposits Small time deposits $ 5.5 $ 8.0 $ 34.0 Certificates of deposit over $100,000 40.0 70.0 100.0 Eurodollar deposits 10.0 10.0 30.0 Plus: Forecast new loans Commercial loans 60.0 112.0 686.0 Consumer loans 22.0 46.0 210.0 Real estate and other loans 31.0 23.0 223.0 Minus: Forecast net change in transactional accountsa Demand deposits -6.5 105.5 10.0 NOW accounts 0.3 4.5 5.0 Super NOW accounts 0.1 1.0 2.0 Money market deposit accounts 1.6 3.0 6.0 Total uses $173.0 $155.0 $1,260.0
Potential Sources of Funds Add: Maturing investments Money market instruments $ 8.0 $ 16.5 $ 36.5 US Treasury and agency securities 7.5 10.5 40.0 Municipal securities 2.5 1.0 12.5 Plus: Principal payments on loans 80.0 262.0 903.0 Total sources $98.0 $290.0 $ 992.0 Periodic Liquidity Gapb $75.0 -$135.0 $ 268.0 Cumulative Liquidity Gap 75.0 -60.0 208.0
240
Time Frame 0-30 Days 31-90 Days 91-365 Days Purchased Funds Capacity Federal funds purchased (overnight and term) $20 $20 $30 Repurchase agreements 10 10 10 Negotiable certificates of deposit Local 50 50 60 National 20 20 25 Eurodollar certificates of deposit 20 20 20 Total $120 $120 $145 Additional Funding Sources Reductions in federal funds sold $5 $5 $5 Loan participants 20 20 20 Sale of money market securities 5 5 5 Sale of unpledged securities 10 10 10 Total $50 $50 $50 Potential Funding Sourcesa $170 $170 $195 Potential Extraordinary Funding Needs 50% of outstanding letters of credit 5 10 15 20% of unfunded loan commitments 25 30 35 Total $30 $40 $50 Excess Potential Funding Sources $140 $130 $145 aPurchased funds capacity plus additional funding sources.
Liquidity Planning: Potential Funding Sources
241
Liquidity Guidelines for Major Regional Bank
Guideline200%
10%
15%
ConsolidatedRatio of Available Sources/Potential Funding Needs over 6 month period
Liquid Assets/Market Sources < 6 months (min)
Market Sources/Total Assets Maturing in 1 month (max)
Holding CompanyMarket sources/Backup facilities (max)
Liquid Assets/Market Sources < 1 months (min)
Backup Facilities (min) Higher ofTotal commercial paper o/s or
Assets > 9 months funded by sources < 9 months
Guideline40%
25%
50%
75%
242
ALM Report at xxx, 20xx
xxxx, 20xxLiquidity Management ($millions) Poicy Guideline $ Limit Actual
Liability Coverage Ratio1 Consolidated over 6 month period 200% 5,342 10,862
Maturity Structure of Net Market Sources2 Consolidated within 1 month 15% 6,824 2,4913 HC within 1 month 40% 280 -713
Liquid Assets as % of Market Sources4 Consolidated market sources < 6 months 10% 420 30735 HC market sources < 1 month 25% 54 854
Commercial Paper Backup Facilities6 Greater of
CP outstandings 50% 338700
Assets > 9 months supported by funding < 9 months 75% -396
243
Other Risk Guidelines
Poicy Guideline RegulatoryMidpoint Range Well-capitalized
Tier 1 Leverage 7% 6.3- 7.7% 5%
Total Risk-adjusted Capital 12% 11.4- 12.6% 10%
Tier 1 Risk-adjusted Capital 6%
Double Leverage 120- 125%
244
Moody’s has traditionally focused on twelve ratios in four categories
Earnings
Asset Quality
Capital
Liquidity
245
Earnings are the “first line of defense against losses”
PPP-Pfd. Dividends-CNCO/BIS RWA + SA
Return on BIS RW + SA
Efficiency ratio (Operating expense/Operating income)
Net interest margin
246
Asset quality needs to be adjusted for seasoning of loans and reserves
Non-performing assets/PPP
Non-performing assets/TCE + SA
Provisions/PPP
247
Capital is important but less so than ability to earn capital
CapitalTCE/BIS RWA + SA
LiquidityNet-cash capital position at bank level/bank assets
Core deposits/Loans
Net Short-term position at BHC/NI
Double Leverage (Investments/TCE)
248
The primary ratios looked at reflect these factors
Median Aa2 Aa3 A1 A2 A3 Baa1
Size (PPP in millions) 384 7,677 4,474 931 551 268 105
LiquidityCore deposits/Loans 76.6 69.2 55.2 70 79 75.7 91.1Liquid assets/ST Loans 72.2 66.0 33.1 62.6 62 36.3 99.1
CapitalTCE/RWA+SS 7 5.8 4.5 5.8 8.75 8.47 8.2
Double Leverage 112.5 116.8 125.7 120.1 115.1 107.1 104
ROA 1.63 1.58 1.52 0.9 2.1 1.63 1.93ROE 21.5 26.8 23.5 15.8 22.1 18.7 23.2
NPA/TCE + Reserves 7.7 11.7 9.8 7.4 3.2 24.3 4.6
Source: Moody’s
(Ratings as of 12/21/2000 and Balance Sheet and income data YTD 6/00.)
249
Financial Overview: Major Regional Bank
Per Share:$3.82 earnings per share$1.88 dividend per share (49% payout)$18.90 book value per share (estimated)$80 acquisition value (4x book)
Operating PerformanceROA 1.8%ROE 23.2%Net interest margin 5.32%Interest spread 4.62%Loans/Deposits 106%Efficiency ratio 53.6%Annual growth rate (1992-1996): Less than 1%in assets due to pooling accounting; equity at 3%Branches: 550Employees: 19, 340 (at 2/28/97including 3,505 FTE)
Assets : $47.6 billion72% Customer Loans7% Interbank8% Securities (1% Trading)7% Cash and Short-term Equivalents1% Fixed Assets
Total Liabilities: $44.5 billion19% Non-interest bearing deposits3% Interbank49% Customer deposits9% Short-term borrowings8% Long-term debtOff-balance sheet commitments andfinancial instruments:$49 billion (110% of total liabilities)
Shareholders’ Equity: $3.1 billion6.5% of assetsTier I Capital: 9.45%Total Capital: 13.23%
250
Financial Overview: Russian Bank
Assets: $1.09 billion49% Customer Loans9.6% Interbank23.4% Securities (19% Trading)8.7% Cash and Short-term Equivalents4.6% Fixed Assets
Total Liabilities: $.926 billion30.8% Interbank42.7% Customer deposits0% Short-term borrowings0% Long-term debtOff-balance sheet commitments andfinancial instruments: $629 million(68% of total liabilities)
Shareholders’ Equity: $164.1 million15.1% of assetsTier I Capital: 12%Total Capital: 28.5%
Per Share: N/A
Operating PerformanceROA 3.3%ROE 18.9%Net interest margin 2.7%Interest spread 2.8%Loans/Deposits 115%Efficiency ratio 62.3%Annual growth rate (1995-1996): 44%Branches: 19Employees: 1,012
251
Financial Overview: Major Money Center Bank
Assets at 9/30/97: $118.3 billion53% Customer Loans20% Interbank15% Securities (1% Trading)2% Cash and Short-term Equivalent1.5% Fixed Assets
Total Liabilities: $113.4 billion8.3% Interbank65.5% Customer deposits6.9% Short-term borrowings3.8% Long-term debt and MIOff-balance sheet commitments andfinancial instruments: $32 billion(28% of total liabilities)
Shareholders’ Equity: $4.9 billion4.2% of AssetsTier I Capital: 6.8%Total Capital: 11.6%
Per Share:$.90 earnings per share$.35 dividend per share (39% payout)$4.37 book value per share$11.25 acquisition value (2.6x book)
Operating PerformanceROA .8%ROE 22.6%Net interest margin 2.5%Interest Spread 2.0%Loans/deposits 81% (excluding interbank)Efficiency ratio 52.5%Annual growth rate (1992-1996): 18%in assets; equity at 14%Branches: 1,026Employees: 30,900
252
Year 2001DTB ABN HSB CIT JPM BAR WAC
A Size1 Total Assets 813,545 529,264 698,312 452,343 693,575 517,676 330,452 2 Risk -Weighted Assets (RWA) 288,532 242,232 391,478 344,950 455,123 230,604 269,726 3 Total Employees 94,782 112,206 171,049 117,103 95,812 78,600 84,046 4 Market Capitalization 43,237 25,340 109,000 - 76,254 - 42,701 5 Market Value / Book Value 1.2 2.5 2.3 - 1.9 - 1.5
B Profitability1 Return on Equity 0.4 20.5 10.2 16.3 3.9 19.0 8.0 2 Return on Assets 0.0 0.6 0.7 1.3 0.2 0.6 0.6 3 Net Interest Income on Assets 0.9 1.8 2.2 3.3 1.5 1.8 2.9 4 Net Interest Margin 1.0 1.9 2.5 3.7 2.0 1.7 3.6 5 Yield on Earning Assets 6.1 6.7 6.1 7.3 5.9 5.6 7.3 6 Funding Cost 5.7 6.6 (4.0) 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.2 7 Spread 0.4 0.1 2.1 3.3 1.7 1.4 3.2 8 Efficiency Ratio 90.4 71.5 56.4 59.4 67.0 57.9 63.6 9 Operating Cost Ratio 2.9 2.3 1.7 3.7 3.2 1.9 3.4
10 Provisions / Average Assets 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 11 Earning Assets / Average Assets 85.8 91.8 84.6 87.8 73.3 94.7 -
C Capital Adequacy1 BIS Tier 1 / Total RWA 8.1 7.0 9.0 9.2 8.3 7.8 7.0 2 BIS Total / Total RWA 12.1 10.9 13.0 13.6 11.9 12.5 11.1 3 Leverage 4.4 7.3 6.8 7.0 5.2 3.4 6.2 4 RWA / Total Assets 35.5 45.8 56.1 76.3 65.6 44.5 81.6
D Liquidity1 Net Loans to Total Deposits 69.5 91.0 82.1 91.0 72.5 98.8 85.8 2 Net Loans to Capital (times) 6.5 6.8 6.7 7.4 5.3 15.7 5.7 3 Liquid Asset Ratio 38.7 13.4 3.7 10.8 11.5 3.1 22.6
E Asset Quality1 NPL / Total Loans 4.2 2.2 3.4 3.6 1.3 2.9 1.1 2 ALLL / NPLs 34.5 76.1 77.4 53.4 119.2 51.5 175.0 3 ALLL / Total Loans 1.4 1.7 2.6 1.9 2.1 1.2 1.8 4 Net Charge-offs / Average Loans 0.7 0.3 - 1.0 1.1 0.4 0.7 5 Open Loan Exposure 17.6 11.9 4.9 12.6 (1.8) 17.6 (3.7)
253
Target Spread on a Loan
Required RAROC (Hurdle Rate) 20%Allocated Capital 8
Net income 2 Pretax income 4Plus non interest expenses 10Plus EL 1Required NIM 15Cost of Funds 10
Interest rate required 25%
Required RAROC (Hurdle Rate) 20%Allocated Capital 8
Net income 2 Pretax income 4Plus non interest expenses 10Plus EL 1Required NIM 15Cost of Funds 10
Interest rate required 25%
254
Example
Operating Expenses LoadCommercial Loan Department 300 33% 66 0.22Retail Branches 600 67% 134Administration 200Total 1100 100% 200
Commercial Loan 100,000Interest 25,000FTP 10,000NII 15,000EL 1,000Direct Costs 8,200Allocated Costs 1,800Pre-tax 4,000After-tax 2,000
Allocated capital 8,000RAROC 25%
Allocated
255
Transfer Pricing
Rate risk spread
Credit spreadLending Unit
Treasury/ALM
987654321
Term in Years
Rate in %
Example of a Funds Transfer Pricing Yield Curve
256
Formulas
Formulas for the Varianceoror
Formulas for the Standard Deviation
Formulas for the Covarianceoror
257
References and further information
Credit Risk Measurement by A. Saunders, Wiley, 1999
Plain English Guide to ALM for Community Banks, Profitstar, Inc. (www.profitstar.com)
www.rmahq.org
www.riskmetrics.com
www.defaultrisk.com
Search other risk sites.
Analyze other bank financial statements
Web pages of Moodys, S&P and Fitch