fsd 01 detectors simulation vs measurements sudip chatterji and indian students (ghosh p, bansal y,...

13
FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH STS Work Group Meeting 10 th January 2012

Upload: phillip-mills

Post on 31-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements

Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students(Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N )

GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbHSTS Work Group Meeting

10th January 2012

Page 2: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

Outline

1. Motivation2. Simulation Vs Measurements

Fluence 1e12 n/cm2

Fluence 1e13 n/cm2

Fluence 3e13 n/cm2

Fluence 1e14 n/cm2

3. Overview & Analysis

Page 3: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

1. Motivation

• To study and verify the FSD Detectors IV & CV Characteristics

• To verify the Simulation module for FSD parameters using the models used previously

• Role of space charge effect on the Breakdown voltages• To study and validate different models for annealing

parameter.– To extract Annealing time constants

Page 4: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.1.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e12(n/cm2)

Page 5: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.1.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e12(n/cm2)

• VFD{Measured} ~ 40V

• VFD{Simulated} ~ 44V

• Leakage current almost comparable

• Simulation results holds good

Page 6: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.2.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e13(n/cm2)

Page 7: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.2.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e13(n/cm2)

• VFD{Measured} ~ 12V

• VFD{Simulated} ~ 15V

• Leakage current almost comparable

• Simulation results almost holds good

Page 8: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.3.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=3e13(n/cm2)

Page 9: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.3.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=3e13(n/cm2)

• Pink curve => Good Detector – VFD{Measured} ~80 V

– VFD{Simulated} ~ 90V

– Leakage current almost comparable, Simulation results almost holds good

• Red curve => Bad Detector – VFD{Measured} ~ not observed

– Leakage Current much higher than expected.

Page 10: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.4.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e14(n/cm2)

Page 11: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

2.4.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e14(n/cm2)

• VFD{Measured} & {Simulated} = not observed

• BD {Measured} = 220V • BD {Simulated} = 250V• Leakage current almost

comparable but• Breakdown appear early in

measurements (red & green)• Impact of Qf Observed

– Increasing the Qf Decreases Break Down voltage ( blue to pink ~ 8e11 1e12)

– May be the Qf ~ 3e12 in measured Detectors

Page 12: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

3.1 Simulation Vs MeasurementOverview

Measured Values for FSD 01 Simulated Values for FSD 01

Page 13: FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy

3.2 Simulation Vs MeasurementAnalysis

• Simulation results holds good with results from FSD01 Detectors.

• Leakage current is comparable in both the cases • VFD{Measured} ~ VFD{Simulated}

• Type inversion observed after Fluence=1e13 n/cm2

• With some bad detectors, statistics in case of detectors becomes important to verify the simulation results.