frp flange design (part 2): asa150/300 flange
TRANSCRIPT
GPI Journal Vol. 2, No. 2
193
GPI Standards Committee
GPI7G-040 Published on Dec 27, 2016
Regular Article
Received on Aug 30, 2016.
Revised on Sep 27, 2016.
Accepted on Oct 11, 2016.
Featured Technology
FRP flange design (Part 2): ASA150/300 Flange
Yoshinori NISHINO1, Allen S CHIU2, Shinichi TAMURA1,
Masaki NISHINO1, Taiga TATSUMI1 1NBL Technovator Co., Ltd., 2NOV FGS Singapore (Pte) Ltd.
Abstract: In the first report, the design of optimal FRP flange was reported. In this second report, outcomes of
optimum ASA150/300 FRP flange design development to apply compression molding method for under 400mm,
and centrifugal molding method for more 400mm up to 3.5m are reported. Detailed research results are shown such
that the cost is about half of the conventional product and the quality is about 2 times.
Keywords: FRP flange, design, seal structure, centrifugal molding method, compression molding method, ASA150,
ASA300
1. Introduction
Features of the FRP flange, since a resin compressive strength
is weak compared to metallic materials, surface strength is
lower than the metal material, but since the reinforcing fiber is
light and the strength is higher than a metal material, in
disadvantages of metal
material. It has been
widely used in the
effective and high
pressure of the oil & gas
field [1] to certain
corrosion measures.
In this case, pick up
the ASA150 / 300
common flange standard
(flange size and bolt),
Contact mold flange of
the O-ring seal format
shown in Figure 1, which was carried out according to the new
design method in the first report [2] that it is an optimal detailed
product design result of up to the 3.5m diameter.
2. Design conditions of the product
Using a secondary processing is not required prepared by
centrifugal casting shown in Figure 1, it is reported in the
following detailed research results of the most rational Contact
mold flange subjected to effective design. (Patent pending
preparation)
Basic design model is shown in Figure 2. Design items
needed, ①standard compatible with the flange of the metal
material to be share, ② to maximize the quality performance
(endurance and the allowable pressure tolerance), to design a
product that can be ③ manufactured at a low cost (Minimum
material).
In other words, FRP flange that allows the ① ~ ③ are
shown in Figure 2, it is an adhesive bonding flange structure of
the same thinking such as weld type of metal flange, adopt a
structure in which the frictional force of adhesion employing
the scarf lap adhesive for the adhesive strength to the maximum
the bonding surface is maximized.
Flange thickness, obtains a necessary and sufficient value for
the tightening strength of the flange bolts by the stress
Fig 1 Contact Flange
Fig.2 Strength of bonding flange3)4)
Fig 3 Strength of bonding Flange3)
Y. Nishino et al. / GPI Journal 2(2) (2016) 193-197
Global oil & gas Pipe Institute 194
calculation shown in Figure 3. In this paper, we propose a new
development in the GPI O-ring seal system, and a newly
developed groove type gland packing seal system furthermore.
Figure 4 (a) is an O-ring seal system of the backup ring junction
sandwiched between a conventional flanges. On the other hand,
Figure 4 (b), is a new development of O- ring seal system that
can be shared with metal flange, O- ring by two 1/2 diameter 0-
ring of the junction between the FRP · metal flange seal
becomes possible. In addition, the large-diameter O-ring seal of
the one in the FRP · FRP flange joint, it is possible to O- ring
seal. In O- ring to adapt to the ground packing flange or the like
with corresponding difficulty uneven structure was developed
groove-type gland packing seal system. Figure 4 (c) is a gland
packing seal system which covers the conventional flange
entire. In contrast, Figure 4 (d) is a new development groove
type gland packing seal system of providing a groove structure
groove for narrow gland packing only to the FRP flange side.
FRP · metal flange joint and is set to both allow the FRP ·
FRP flange joint. And structural calculation of FRP flange is
optimally designed with allowable stress calculation and use
material of a screw joint structure of GPI coupling similar 1/16
taper scarf wrap shown in Figure 2 [2]. Result of obtaining a
reasonable maximum efficiency, that the durability of the
packing material with minimum seat ring area is excellent in
stable sealing quality performance are the best, which is a new
O-ring system. Complementing it, it is more widely groove type
gland packing seal system that can be adapted to existing
equipment.
3. Flange bolts allowable load and the necessary
seal pressure (Influence of applied load of O-
ring and gland packing)
From the flange structure shown in Figure 2, the clamping
bolt force F, since the stress of the difference between the
sealing required force Fs becomes effective flange joining force,
basic quality performance flanges are determined by clamping
bolt standard flange shown in Figure 5 and the pipe diameter
The standard flange applications, maximum performance is
designed to take full advantage of the clamping force of the
provisions, it will be the compressive load of the seat ring
necessary to seal the minimum, that is, to minimize the seat ring
diameter. Figure 5 is at the optimum design seal structure of
each seal format shown in 500 to 1000mm diameter standard
flange data and 4 of the standard flange of ASA150 / 300,
standard bolt (yield point 200MPa) use, seal theory (the seat
ring 1.5 pressure) application, the axial force of the internal
pressure effect, is the calculation results of the moment the
maximum allowable breakdown voltage of the case of ignoring
the load from the piping structure. Green color in the figure is
assumed that the seat ring of the new O-ring system is in the
inner ring of the tube (new gland packing system is also the
same), gland packing system was calculated as necessary to 1.5
times the sealing pressure on the flange over the entire surface.
And shows the application bolt washer diameter and the ISO
standard bolt tightening torque necessary to stress the variance
for holding allowable compressive force of the weakness of the
FRP material the (200MPa or less) as a reference. In other
words, the tolerance of the durability of the AWWA technical
standards, since the required five times the safety factor of the
allowable stress, and to adopt a new O-ring system, ASA150 is
apply the internal pressure of the flange standard maximum
2MPa, SAS300 the maximum 3MPa. On the other hand, if you
adopt the gland packing, the ASA150, 300 both about 1MPa
and about 1.3MPa. In the short-term use of GPI standard (about
10 years), for the safety factor is 3 times, each new O-ring is
ASA150; 3MPa, ASA300; 5Mpa, gland packing in is ASA150;
1.6MPa, ASA300; 2MPa. The compression forces acting on
FRP flange using standard washer is about one-third the
allowable 200MPa the CS material ASA150 / 300 together
about 70MPa shown in Figure 5. On the other hand, the flange
bolts in the case of using high-tensile bolts, requiring changes
since the application of the use range of the allowable
compressive force of the FRP washers change or laminated
materials. Further, it applied load which is calculated by the
process piping design (thermal stress, etc. bending load) will
supplement that must be taken into account as well.
Fig.4 O-ring and grand packing of bonding flange5)8)
(a) Backup ring O-ring seal (b) New O-ring seal
(c) Grand packing seal (d) New groove grand packing seal
GPI Journal Vol. 2, No. 2
195
GPI Standards Committee
GPI7G-040 Published on Dec 27, 2016
Regular Article
Received on Aug 30, 2016.
Revised on Sep 27, 2016.
Accepted on Oct 11, 2016.
Although it is possible to more FRP flange design that applies
a high pressure flange in the standard flange, here, it took up
ASA150, 300 general purpose.
4. New O-ring seal ASA150 / 300 flange
Figure 6 is a detailed design result of Contact mold flange
which adopted the new O-ring system of the standard flange of
ASA150 / 300. Left reference value standard flange of Figure 6
at (outer diameter, inner diameter, bolt hole and application
volts), followed by stress relieving the optimal balance detailed
structural dimensions designed structures, maximum
breakdown voltage of the standard bolt, the available acceptable
a breakdown voltage. Right figure is a detailed design result of
adaptation size and a groove of new O-ring. Left of right
diagram showing metal flange and the right is FRP flange. The
convex portion of the seat-Contact surface which is
characteristic of the metal flange ASA reference is constant
with 1.6 ㎜. However, R1 dimensions of the ASA flange and
JIS flange is different.
The dimensions of the recess R of FRP flange for all in
common, to adopt a dimension to add 4 mm in maximum
diameter to allow these. On the other hand, 0-installation of the
ring of the groove should be in the minimum diameter in order
to reduce the axial force. Single from the seal theory, double use
O-ring is to adopt a compression standard of the initial
deformation amount of 20%.ASA150 flange of the results
25mm ~ 3600 ㎜ is designed with four types of groove and
eight of the thickness of the O-ring. particular, most field 150
to 1500 ㎜ flange used is common d1: 6mm, d2: 12mm 2 types
of O-ring of and one kind of groove FRP flange w16mm, and
H5.6mm. The recess of the FRP flange corresponding to the
convex portion of the metal flange is as 1.6mm, can be shared
with the metal flange of purpose. It should be noted that, in class
150 (ASA150), even if the use of the general bolt adopted a new
O-ring seal, from one-third the allowable maximum value GPI
standard of 10-year durability is acceptable breakdown voltage
becomes 3MPa. In class 300 (ASA300) is the result of a 5MPa.
The compression force by bolts washers acting on the FRP
flange surface acts as shown in Figure 5. Further, since the acts
similarly like bending load, 10 years durability required for
these are necessary to design the strength borne as well.
5. Optimal design result of ASA150 · 300
The results of Figure 6, and can be shared between the
optimum product design purpose of the metal flange of
ASA150, 300, centrifugal casting production productivity with
the best performance (maximum allowable tolerance) at the
minimum material (material cost minimum) becomes the
maximum is a detailed results of the obtained optimum value
by the theoretical calculation simulation a capable product
design. Apply tube diameter that is another color at about 450
mm or less in the figure, compression molding method can take
higher productivity than the centrifugal casting production. The
material selection SMC is the best. In addition, until 1500 ㎜
of ASA150 flange thick part at the optimal material is 7 mm CS
is optimal strengthening 25 mm CS glass fiber. Its content is
optimal selection of about thin 50 wt% ~ about 60 wt% thick.
In the above 1500 mm, WR (roving Cross: suitable, such as
one-way weave) and the sharing of a decrease of more
reinforcement material.
Furthermore, when ND 450 mm or less, 25 mm short fiber
material including about 30% filler is used for SMC material.
For 500-1500 mm, 50 ~ 60% wt of CS is used for centrifugal
casting 7 ~ 25 mm CS. A large flange of 1800 mm or more is
designed by composite laminate in which WR is laminated on
the surface layer. Note that the application resins, to decrease
material cost, to decrease curing time to about at least less than
one hour is required, even the curing time of epoxy resin is
slower than 20 minutes, shortest polyester resin. Therefore,
product manufacturing costs, the results are vinyl ester resins
specifications as compared to the epoxy resin used is low.
Looking at product weight, material cost of the object, it
Fig 5 Allowable Pressure of ASA150/300 Flange by Bolt
Y. Nishino et al. / GPI Journal 2(2) (2016) 193-197
Global oil & gas Pipe Institute 196
had
to
have
on
average halved as compared with the existing Vanstone flange
(40%) Prototype result of the check, the product performance
as designed is obtained.
Incidentally, the flange assembly, seal ring reamer pin
specification for the centering and the adhesive by the caulking
material in the flange was needed. Further, details will be
t
Fig 6 FRP Design forASA150/300 Flange by New 0-ring system2)6)7)8)
GPI Journal Vol. 2, No. 2
197
GPI Standards Committee
GPI7G-040 Published on Dec 27, 2016
Regular Article
Received on Aug 30, 2016.
Revised on Sep 27, 2016.
Accepted on Oct 11, 2016.
omitted, in the above applications 1MPa must be used as shown
in Figure 6 standard plastic back-up ring in addition to the O-
ring seal.
And, check production rate of 600 mm prototype, it takes
time to casting from material supply is about 10 minutes, curing
demolding was required about 30 minutes. To confirm the
production of a total of 40 minutes / book. It was confirmed that
it is still secondary processing production of unnecessary
casting products. .
6. Conclusion
Structure of optimum flange to adhesive bonding in the first
Report, reported the research results, such as approximate
calculation methods such as design basic sheet ring seal and
material selection and allowable stress. Contact mold flanges
employing the new O-ring system is reported conclusion that
the optimum basic structure flange.
Based on the conclusion, optimal design results of the
theoretical calculation simulation of Contact mold flange Part 2
is to be adhesively bonded adopted the new O-ring seal of the
general-purpose standard flange such as the ASA flange and
JIS16K of class 150 and 300 (3500 ㎜ up) was reported.
The obtained research results of the research goals, but may
be ① a common junction ② necessary material half, also
half the production cost, ③ product design of optimal flange
that product quality is twice was obtained.
It should be noted that the results of this research is to append
that it is a pending patent application preparation.
References
[1] Allen S. Chiu, Performance Requirements of FRP
Tubular for Oil& Gas Production, Japan Reinforced
Plastics, Vol.33, No. 3, pp. 97-103 (1987).
[2] Yoshinori Nishino, Allen. S. Chiu, Shinichi Tamura,
Masaki Nishino, Taiga Tatsumi, FRP flange design (Part
1) Necessary strength and optimum structure, GPI
Jounal, Vol.2, No.2, pp.187-192 (2016).
[3] Masaki Uhara, Taiga Tatsumi, Masaki Nishino, Shinichi
Tamura, Yoshinori Nishino, Study on the production of
the flange by the centrifugal forming method (Part 1),
GPI Journal Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 262-267 (2015).
[4] Masaki Uhara, Taiga Tatsumi, Masaki Nishino,
Shinichi Tamura, Yoshinori Nishino, Study on the
production of the flange by the centrifugal forming
method (Part 2), GPI Journal Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 268-273
(2015).
[5] Yoshinori Nishino, Merits of and design method for
long-distance FRP piping, The Piping Engineering,
H10‐01A.Vol. 30, No. 5.131-138 (1988).
[6] Takashi Shimosakon, Masaki Uhara, Taiga Tatsumi,
Shinichi Tamura, Yoshinori Nishino, Design Method of
FRP Pipe for Oil Well Frontier. International Journal
of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-
12 (2015).
[7] Takashi Shimosakon, Shinichi Tamura, Yoshinori
Nishino,GPI standard Corrosion FRP High Pressure
Pipes for Oil & Gas Well (Design standard of GPI
standard Piping Joint,The Piping Engineering,Vol. 56,
No.9,pp. 17-25 (2014).
[8] Yoshinori Nishino, Construction method of secondary
bonding joint of fiber reinforced plastic pipe, Adv.
Composite Material, Vol.1, No,4, pp. 277-290 (1991)ʾ
ⓒVSP1991.