from personalized to individualized immunotherapy - the ... · managing director: medigene...
TRANSCRIPT
12/1/2016
1
From personalized to individualized immunotherapy -the next major step in developing
medicines of the future
Prof. Dr. Dolores J. Schendel
CEO/CSO: Medigene AGManaging Director: Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH
"Safe Harbor" Statement
This presentation contains forward-looking statements, whichare based on our current expectations and assumptions.Due to various risks and uncertainties including changes inbusiness, economic competitive conditions, regulatory reforms,foreign exchange rate fluctuations and the availability offinancing, actual results, performance or achievements coulddiffer materially from those included in the forward-lookingstatements. These and other risk factors are discussed in theCompany’s public reports. The company does not assume anyobligations to update or revise any of these forward-lookingstatements, even if new information becomes available in thefuture.
12/1/2016
2
Immunotherapy ̶ the future of cancer therapy
3
Classical Mainstays
Surgery
Radiation
Chemotherapy
Newer
Treatments
Hormone therapies
Small moleculetargeted therapies
Antibody therapies
Cancer
Immunotherapies
Stem cell transplantation
Immune response modifiers
DC vaccines
Latest developments:
Adoptive cell therapies
CARs and TCRs
Before 1990 1990-2010 From 2010
4
Biomarkers of interest to understand the move from personalized to individualized immunotherapy of cancer
T cells residing
in the tumor
microenvironment
Tumor mutations
allowing formation of
neoantigens for T cell
recognition
12/1/2016
3
Adaptive immune reactions within a tumor influence clinical outcome in colon carcinoma
5Galon et al., Cancer Research, March 2007
Cold Hot
Localization of CD3-positive T cells impact on disease-free survival
6Galon et al., Science, September 2006
12/1/2016
4
Type of CD3 T cell infiltrate influences rate of relapse in patients with colon carcinoma
7
High density Th1/cytotoxic memory T lymphocytes in
tumor center and at invasive margin of the primary
tumor associated with low risk of relapse and
metastasis and overall survival.
Tumors from patients without recurrence had higher
immune cell densities (CD3, CD8, GZMB and
CD45RO).
The correlation between a robust lymphocyte
infiltration and patient survival has been well
documented in melanoma, ovarian, head and neck,
breast, urothelial, colorectal, lung cancer.
From Galon et al., Science, September 2006:
mRNA levels of seven genes from Th1 adaptive cluster, from maximal (red) to minimal (blue) expression levels.
Immune checkpoints halt T cell responses via two central pathways: CTLA-4/B7 and PD-1/PD-L1
8Wolchock J, et al. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(15 suppl); abstract 9012
T cell Tumor cell
MHCTCR
PD-L1PD-1T cellDendritic
cell
MHCTCR
CD28
B7 CTLA-4- - -
Activation(cytokines, lysis, proliferation,
migration to tumor)
B7+++
+++
CTLA-4 pathway PD-1 pathway
Periphery Tumor microenvironment
++ +
PD-L2PD-1
- - -
- - -
12/1/2016
5
Clinical benefit from immune checkpoint blockade
9
Selected immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical trials:
Anti-CTLA-4 antibody: Ipilimumab (Yervoy)
Anti-PD-1 antibody: Nivolumab (Opdivo)/Pembrolizumab (Keytruda)
Anti-PD-L1 antibody: Atezolizumab (Tecentriq)
Robert et al., N Engl J Med, 2011 Robert et al., N Engl J Med, 2015 Garon et al., N Engl J Med, 2015
Ipilimumab inmetastatic melanoma
Pembrolizumab inNSCLC
Nivolumab in untreated melanoma
(without BRAF mutation)
Cancers vary widely in mutational burden
10
Alexandrov et al., Nature 2013
Antithetical observation: The best responses to checkpoint blockade occur in patients who have tumors with highest mutational burdens
12/1/2016
6
Mutations alter the array of peptides presented at the tumor cell surface for T cell recognition
11
Neoantigens are formed when mutant peptides bind to a patient’s HLAmolecule and are presented at the surface of a tumor cell.
Finn O. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2704–2715
Long-term benefit of CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade is associated with high mutational burden in melanoma
12Snyder et al., N Engl J Med, December 2014
12/1/2016
7
Neoantigens impact on long-term benefit of CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade in melanoma patients
13Snyder et al., N Engl J Med, December 2014
14
Mutational load & neoantigens in NSCLC impact clinical benefit with PD-1 checkpoint blockade
Nonsynonymous mutation
burden associated with
clinical benefit of anti-PD-1
therapy
High neoantigen burden
correlates with PFS
12/1/2016
8
Tumors with high mutation, many cytotoxic T cells, and strong inhibition respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade
15Bobisse et al., Ann Tansl Med, May 2016
Adoptive cell transfer of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes can lead to regression in melanoma
16Gattinoni et al., Nat Rev Immunol, 2006 .
Enigma: What is the specificity of T cells present among TIL that deliver the greatest clinical benefit?
National Cancer Institute, www.cancer.gov
12/1/2016
9
Clinically effective TIL contain high avidity T cells that see neoantigens present in autologous melanoma
17
Robbins et al., Nature, June 2013
18
Adoptive cell transfer of neoantigen-specific T cells for treatment of melanoma - medicine of the future
Dudley M E & Rosenberg S A, Nature Reviews Cancer, September 2003
12/1/2016
10
Adoptive T cell therapy with patient T cells modified to express neoantigen-specific TCRs
19
TCR-modified
patient T cells with neoantigenspecificity
12
4
5
Isolation of
patient T cells
vector
mediated
TCR transfer
3
Can we help patients who have no TIL and have tumors with low mutational burdens?
20
Differential
NGS analysis
Tumor tissue Normal tissue
Selection of potentially relevant
tumor-specific mutations
Autologous mDCs Naïve T cell repertoire
of healthy donors
Fast, flexible and efficient method to define neoantigens for vaccines andgenerate TCRs directed against individual tumor mutations
Mutation 1
Mutation 2
Mutation 3
Mutation 4
Mutation 5
Mutation ..
ivt-RNA
+
(outsourced to others)(use of outsourced and
in-house bioinformatic tools)
www.illumina.com
12/1/2016
11
multimer
CD
8
Donor
1D
onor
2D
onor
3D
onor
4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
IFN
-γre
lease
[O
D]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
IFN
-γre
lease [
OD
]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
IFN
-γre
lease
[O
D]
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
IFN
-γre
lease
[O
D]
Specificity-screen of T-cell clonesSort of
multimer+ T cells
Next Generation Sequencing of
TCRs
+ -
Four healthy donors yield T cells specific for mutation-1 presented by HLA-A2
21Mutated epitope Wild type epitope
www.illumina.com
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV38-1*01
TRAV13-1*02
TRAV13-1*02
TRAV13-1*02
TRAV13-1*02
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV27*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV12-2*02
TRAV12-2*02
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV40*01
TRAV26-2*01
TRAV26-2*01
TRAV26-2*01
TRAV26-2*01
TRAV26-2*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV19*01
TRAV19*01
TRAV35*02
TRAV35*02
TRAV29/DV5*01
TRAV5*01
TRAV5*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV3*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV29/DV5*01
TRAV29/DV5*01
TRAV29/DV5*01
TRAV25*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV24*01
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-1*03
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV12-2*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV14/DV4*01
TRAV14/DV4*01
TRAV34*01
TRAV34*01
TRAV27*01
TRAV22*01
TRAV19*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV9-2*01
TRAV38-2/DV8*01
TRAV8-2*01
donor 1 donor 2 donor 3 donor 4
22
Mutation-1-specific T cell responses seenwith individual donors are complex
N= 10 TCRs
N= 13 TCRs
N= 20 TCRs
N= 5 TCRs
1 mutation4 healthy blood donors
306 screened T cell clones256 antigen-specific clones (84%)
48 neoantigen-specific TCRsfor the patient!
12/1/2016
12
23
Proof-of-Principle: T cell responses detected against 4 of 7 selected neoantigens
� 7 predicted neoantigen-derived epitopes from 6 proteins
� 4 healthy blood donors used for DC-T cell co-cultures
� Specific T cell clones found for 4/7 neoantigen-epitopes
� TCRs found in response of each donor ranged from afew to many unique sequences
� 3/7 mutation-spanning epitopes in 2 proteinsdid not stimulate T cell responses in any donor(possibly due to sub-optimal binding to HLA-A*02:01)
24
Results of differential
NGS analysis availableSet up in vitro cultures
Sort and
expand T cells
Test
clones
+ NGS
TCR sequences
available
Preparation
Priming
Expansion
Selection
3 weeks
3 weeks
2 weeks
1 week
Proof-of-Technology: Medigene utilizes automation for high-throughput identification of lead candidates
Selection of T cells
Screening of TCR candidates
High-throughput TCR analysis
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9weeks 0
www.tecan.com
12/1/2016
13
Take-home messages
25
Proof-of-Principle
Proof-of-Technology
Process and steps of automation allow neoantigen-specific TCRs
to be identified in approximately 6 weeks (+ 3 wks for tumor NGS)
Medigene’s in vitro DC priming approach reveals mutation-specific T
cell responses
→ Identification of immunogenic neoantigens for DC vaccines
Medigene’s de novo process yields abundant T cell clones
→ Fast and efficient sources of TCRs for adoptive T cell therapies
26
From personalized to individualized immunotherapies
Spontaneous anti-tumorT cell responses are present in tumors
T cell responses intumor microenvironment
Th1/CTL responses are best
Efficacious T cellsrecognize neoantigens
T cells drive checkpoint inhibition
Checkpoint blockadereallows T cell responses
1
2
3
4
5
Tumors varyin mutational burden
High numbers of mutationsyield more neoantigens
More neoantigens supportbetter spontaneous
T cell responses
1
2
3
Tumor mutationsleading to neoantigens
12/1/2016
14
27
From personalized to individualized immunotherapies
Tumor mutations
leading to neoantigens
Spontaneous anti-tumorT cell responses are present in tumors
Immune responses in
tumor microenvironment
Th1/CTL responses are best
Efficacious T cellsrecognize neoantigens
T cells drive checkpoint inhibition
Checkpoint blockadereallows T cell responses
1
2
3
4
5
Tumors varyin mutational burden
High numbers of mutationsyield more neoantigens
More neoantigens supportbetter spontaneous
T cell responses
1
2
3
Conclusion:Neoantigen-based immunotherapies
will become the medicine of the future!
Acknowledgments
Medigene Immunotherapies GmbH
Dr. Christian Ellinger
Dr. Markus Dangl
Dr. Christiane Geiger
Dr. Slavoljub Milosevic
Dr. Silke Raffegerst
Dr. Daniel Sommermeyer
Dr. Carina Wehner
Dr. Manon Weis
Dr. Susanne Wilde
28
Dr. Daniel Sommermeyer
Dr. Christian Ellinger
Dr. Slavoljub Milosevic
12/1/2016
15
Medigene AG
Lochhamer Straße 11
82152 Planegg / Martinsried
Germany
Listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange (MDG, Prime Standard)
T +49 - 89 - 20 00 33 - 0
F +49 - 89 - 20 00 33 - 2920
www.medigene.com
Medigene AG
Lochhamer Strasse 11
82152 Planegg / Martinsried
Germany
Listed on Frankfurt Stock Exchange (MDG1, Prime Standard)
T +49 - 89 - 20 00 33 - 0
F +49 - 89 - 20 00 33 - 2920
www.medigene.com
Thank you