from actor analysis to action plan: … · – to deepen the actor analysis (fp i) ... • two...
TRANSCRIPT
FROM ACTOR ANALYSIS TO ACTION PLAN:
WORKSHOP RESULTSNEO-CARBON ENERGY 8th RESEARCHERS’ SEMINAR
Wed-Thu 23.-24.8.2017Lassi Similä, Tiina Koljonen & Amanda Björnberg, VTT
Background and contents– NCE Workshop 23.2.2017 at VTT (Otaniemi)
– to deepen the actor analysis (FP I) and validate the results– Deeper interlinking with energy system analysis (WP2) and
business case analysis (WP3) – From actor analysis to robust action plan
– What are the most important next steps in Finland and who are the most important actors?– Governance and policy analysis– Linkage to energy and climate strategies
From actor analysis to roadmapand robust action plan
• From Vision to Action1. Transformative leadership => “Leadership for
limitless growth”2. Finland as a frontrunner => roadmap and
robust action plan3. Piloting
SOCIETAL VISION 2050Humanity has been able to meet the demand of 55,000 TWh of electricity per year emission free.
Production is mostly automated and artificial intelligences are ubiquitous, making society function highly efficiently.
Working hours are halved and citizens are able to self-organize. People use the new free time for their own and community projects, producing use-value for the rest of society as well.
Vision and its enablers
Vision• Finland as a front-runner in Paris
Agreement implementation
• Transformative leadership
• New actors / new industrialorganisation
• Piloting
(Vision: desirable state of future)
Governance and policy• New Energy and Climate strategy 2030 for Finland
– 38% GHG reduction of non-ETS sector (compared with 2005)– 50% RES from final energy consumption– Phase out of coal, 50% reduction of fossil oil (used for
domestic purposes), 55% of energy from domestic resources
• After 2030 ”New WAM” (With Additional Measures)– GHG reduction 80-95% (compared with 1990 emission level)– XX% RES– XX% reduction of fossil oil
Fulfilling Paris Agreement requires accelerated policies and measures to support and ensure transformation
Group work: From Vision to Action• Who are or could be the key actors? What actions would be
needed?
• Potential actor types include businesses, public governanceorganisations, citizen organisations, consumer groups, etc…
• Potential actions appear in fields of policies, technology development, piloting…
• Two sub-task (Futures Wheels & PESTEC Tables), three groups• 16 participants representing research, business, NGOs
Group work: From Vision to Action• Aim: to define building blocks for roadmap
and action plan for ”Neo-Carbon Finland 2050”
• Guideline: think of Finland as a front-runner in climate change mitigation, implementation of Paris Agreement and the ”new economy” of robotization, environmental businesses etc.
The opportunities for Finnish actors
What could and should these actors be like by 2050? What is the business ecosystem like?
New products, services, ways to operate, organisation models (2020-2030)
Pioneer actors, existing or imaginary
(weak signals)
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel
11PESTEC 2020-2030 2030-2050
Political
Economic
Social
Technological
Environ-mental/ Energy
Cultural/Customer/Citizen
Analysis of the results• Two independent summaries made by different
researchers of the results of three independentgroups
• One summary was based on oral presentations, whereas the other on written materials by the groups
• The analyses were compared and the common/most highlighted conclusions presented
• This way, it was targeted to minimise an effect of single researcher’s interpretations
14Timeline Ideas about who the actors arethat came up in many groups
New ideas for who or what the actors could be
Existingalready
The Neo-Carbon Energy project and brand Maas (Mobility As A Service)
Startups: EkoRent, Joukon Voima, CO2-esto Non-energy companies enter the market (e.g. Telia Sonera)
Mobility and energy as a service Trial culture (for instance “Nopeat kokeilut” in the Climate Street project)
Communities (e.g. “Uusi Energiapolitiikka”, Energiaremontti, different Facebook groups, energy producing communities and local food –circles)
“City champions” and “energy awards” –new role models in ecological and green lifestyles and leadership are recognized and awarded publicly
Fortum fund
2020 - 2030 V2X (from vehicle to X) –EV:s as mobile electricity storage to increase flexibility
Changes in dietary habits
Citizens have become empowered by digitalization (e.g. increased demand response through a mobile application, increased awareness)
Finland has the image of being an attractive environment for companies and for RES investments, e.g. Tesla cold weather tests, Google data centres..
2050 Cyber security is an important issue and it is connected to the way our societies get their energy; more distributed for safety reasons? Off-grid solutions?
Carbon sink and –reuse companies, industry as a carbon provider
EV Uber / private car ownership and driving has decreased significantly in the OECD
Emissions steer decisions in the same way as prices do today
Grassroots leaders / communities have more power
Conclusions: Actors• Pioneer actors named often fall under categories of policy, public, or
citizen movement actors. • The role of funding and related organisations highlighted repeatedly:
international and national funds, crowdfunding • Events even decades ago may play a role in public acceptance
(”Energy memory”). This may influence in key actors such as citizens, politicians, businesses, and consequently, development and take-up of new solutions.
• Several technological developments identified as enablers/drivers for actors
• Electric Vehicles highlighted by all groups• Storages, distributed and off-grid generation, and artifical intelligence• District heating as a Finnish specialty
• Thinking: technology firms relatively scarcely mentioned. Can weconclude technology readiness soon achieved? Or does this reflectstrong reliance in technology developers?
Conclusions: Actions• Actions under control of Governments strongly higlighted.
• The next electoral terms and Governmental Programmes as concrete steps for actions in Finland.
• Role of citizens also identifiable• Involvelment, concretization, learning, influencing attitudes
mentioned, for example• ”Climate Pearl Harbour”: a big, unexpected event to turn the
atmosphere more progressive for actions.• Actions are driven increasingly by events in multilateral and
dispersed world• Both market logics and values assessed as a frame for actions
identified– Changes in electricity markets necessary for needed actions
Conclusions of the workshop and next steps
• A lot of new ideas expressed especially on PESTEC and Futures wheels
• Further working on innovative ideas and new openings– As building blocks of Roadmap– Priorisation: identifying the most important conclusions– Reporting
What could and should these actors be like by 2050? What is the business ecosystem like?
New products, services, ways to operate, organisation models (2020-2030)
Pioneer actors, existing or imaginary
(weak signals)
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel: Group 1
EV Uber
Building aggregator Energy service
ecosystem
Glocal
CCU –circular ecosystem Industry as a
carbon provider
Cities as an ecosystem
Mega factories
Block chain marked mechanism Grassroots
leaders
PET “robot” Personal Energy Trainer
Energy improvement service for households
Carbon sink corporations
Carbon reuse service
R&B ecosystem: Research universities, VTT, Businesses
V2X –EVs as mobile power
Energy Motonet
“Energy store” complete energy service
Energy as a service
Open data solution developers
NCE scenarios in a game to illustrate
Super active citizens
Personal energy trainers
Grassroots groups –communal energy
Solar energy –Public and private solar parks + DSOs
Building open data management service providers NCE ambassadors –
marketing Finland as an attractive country for RE investment
FinPro
DSOs + energy as a service –Retailers communal energy (renting etc.)
V2G aggregators
O&M companies for PV and wind
Autonomous EVs and V2G
Market mechanism for smart storage utilisation
Wood construction companies & bio products
Science centre Heureka (more active role)
Expanded demand response (e.g. phone app)
Power markets + energy markets
Expanded interconnections HVDC
Fortum fund
NCE society game funding from Kone foundation
Electric boats, motorcycles, forest machines, etc.
Mobile EV charging + maintenance
Helen
Energy companies w. new products, especially in customer applications
Zen Robotics
K. Mykkänen & co.
DSOs + retailers net metering
Investments and exports needed
NCE -brand
Event in NY 21.9.2017
Energiaremontti-group: open intra, open data, open innovation
Carbon re-use developers
Ålandsbanken Green card that tracks CO2 from shopping
“Trial –culture”
EV developers (charging stations, vehicles, market mechanisms)
Car companies: EV roll-out
Public and commercial EV charging stations
23PESTEC 2020-2030 2030-2050
Political
Economic
Social
Technological
Environ-mental/ Energy
Cultural/Customer/Citizen
Carbon footprint –based taxation / pricing. True cost of carbon 100€/t
Ze Day (21.9) for global citizen activation
Acknowledge urgency of climate change mitigation
Focus on energy efficiency + demand reduction
Energy community “Demos” eco-village
Divest from fossil fuels
“Model citizens” awarded in media (“Energy gala”)
Open source innovation
Develop XXX new heating options
Expanded sustainability labelling (e.g. swan) Energy audits
and certificates
Finland a model for “one earth” living –plan / campaign needed
Continued development of gas storage + network
Kinetic energy harvesting from all built environment
Autonomous vehicles on demand
Grids support distributed generation
Open data platforms to be developed
More R&D support for innovation & new technologies
Develop storage capacity
Smart EV charging infrastructure everywhere
GIS apps for emission free Finland
Energy-health-wellbeing story developed
Develop education program fro schools (focus on transition)
Develop “a relationship with energy” for citizens
Slush, Hack, etc. forums for NCE
Visualising catastrophes as early warning to make actions happen
Visualising solutions & making the NCE world attractive
Achieve goals of Paris Agreement
Ban fossil fuels:1. Coal + peat2. Oil3. Gas
Military type action plan to scale down fossil and implement renewables
New, realistic INDC
Re-focus Finland's bio strategy
NCE party: green business party mitigating climate change
Free public transit
Campaign for Finland to become the most attractive investment environment
Update INDC’s 2018 or 2023
Reduce / eliminate EV tax
Ban ICE vehicles
RE minister
Enable net metering
No fossil subsidies
Taxation model for distributed energy supply
Consumer EV prices subsidized
Show where the money from the carbon tax goes
Create “climate biz” governance body Develop “energy
service” markets & mechanisms
Attract new technology investments to Finland
Develop sharing economy biz models
Develop grassroots business models
Develop new heating options
What could and should these actors be like by 2050? What is the business ecosystem like?
New products, services, ways to operate, organisation models (2020-2030)
Pioneer actors, existing or imaginary
(weak signals)
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel: Group 2
Energy self sufficiency important? Fusion?
Off-grid areas and decentralised energy production
Emissions steer activities in the same way as prices do today
New generations in power –what are their values?
Private car ownership and driving has decreased significantly (OECD)
Technology that we can not yet imagine is in use
Cyber risks are real –off-grid systems is one possible solution
Communities and citizen initiatives have more power (e.g. the future Joukon Voima)
Methane synthesis
Changes in dietary habits
Electricity storage both on a local and a utility scale
EVs as electricity storage
Vertical farming on an industrial scale; e.g. nutrient dosing by AIs, algae farming
Hydrogen and methane production through biological route
GMO for fuel production
Increased need for electricity for recycling of CO2
Non-energy companies enter the energy business: e.g. Telia Sonera.
Piloting in Finland, markets global
Startup:CO2 -esto
Startup: Joukon Voima
Distributed energy production: both commercial (e.g. mall roofs) and NGO- and community driven
Virtual energy producers
Gasum
International environmental funds
Taaleritehdas: wind- and solar fund
CO2 capture –Savonlinna, LPR Wärtsilä solar
Fortum funds
Communities that strive to increase cycling, make locally produced food available to city dwellers & more
Maas (Mobility as a service)
EkoRent
Energy producing communitiesAlternatives for moving
all air cables underground (new technologies, off-grid areas..
27PESTEC 2020-2030 2030-2050
Political
Economic
Social
Technological
Environ-mental/ Energy
Cultural/Customer/Citizen
Energy storage
Small, easy to install PV systems to increase private citizen PV ownership
Communication: positive and engaging
Several new, specialised media channels are needed in Finland
Increase awareness: speaking in schools, online campaigns etc.
Demand flexibility: getting used to the idea
Demand flexibility
Human greed, own interests always at the centre
Environmental values even more strongly present in marketing
Methane emission shock to the atmosphere?
Grass root -level movements and increasing importance of communities
It should no longer be pay off to be a free rider (new markets/ new mechanisms)
Efficiency and functionality of large, regional transmission networks (e.g. Europe –wide)
Negative drivers (e.g. air pollution) are the best at spurring action: there is an imperative to act.
Information wars must be prevented
There’s a need to reach also those who are not in the “green citizen –bubble”: how to get rural residents to live more ecologically?
Politicians who make ecological lifestyles mainstream
Harnessing the welfare state’s existing mechanisms to further ecological sustainability
Carbon tax
Global carbon tax
Global cooperation on environmental issues
How to ensure order and common rules in a polarised world? A new
legitimate power user?
Certificates of origin for energy, also products produced with fossil fuels must disclose this information
Electricity markets work now, but not in the long run without modifications
Affordability of small –scale energy storage
New technologies to feed energy to the grid
Creating a new “common culture”, breaking bubbles
Is the internet –generation more altruistic than Homo Economicus?
Citizen support for the political system and authority
What could and should these actors be like by 2050? What is the business ecosystem like?
New products, services, ways to operate, organisation models (2020-2030)
Pioneer actors, existing or imaginary
(weak signals)
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel
Futures Wheel: Finland as a frontrunner in new (environmental) business and Paris Climate Agreement
implementation
Futures wheel, GROUP 3
The Energy Gang (US)
“Leading figures” (e.g. Trudeau) Who controls /
influences citizens’ actions?
Citizens are not empowered at the moment
Mainstream media and social media
Communities e.g. on Facebook: ecological housing areas
City councils + key civil servants
“Uusi energiapolitiikka” Facebook group
VTT Neo Carbon Energy
CLC
New companies (start-ups)
New model of operation for the welfare state
The picture of good life in Finland
Actors and actions have paid themselves back already
Finland is the country where Tesla cold weather tests are performed
A large citizen debate on new models of operation
More pressure to further and promote RES systematically
Laws are enabling of a C-neutral world and new technologies
New rules, old ones abolished
Blockchain pilot
Cyber security
Concrete new plans for the future are published
“Showrooms” outside Kehä III: solutions for sparsely populated areas
Venture Capital
Enabling buildings
Enablers of new city leadership models
Hack the city
Smart & clean city planning
Citizens have been empowered by digitalisation
Attractive environment for companies
Environmental matters are on the news daily
Evolved relationship to private ownership: e.g. cars
WWF
Energy Internet, 2-way electricity grid by renewal of pricing and taxation
Showrooms and fast trials
Ecosystem of businesses: startups, SMES, corporations
District heating
Mobility and energy as a service
S & C to have bigger role in the cities after social and health reform (SOTE)
Protocols and standardisation for the internet of energy
Big reform in energy (vrt. liikennekaari)
How to influence citizens?
City “champions” who set great examples in leadership
Neighbouring diffusion of innovations
31PESTEC 2020-2030 2030-2050
Political
Economic
Social
Technological
Environ-mental/ Energy
Cultural/Customer/Citizen “Clean city
initiative”
Citizen initiativesMunicipality –level entrepreneurs, frontrunners in service and financing
Make the terminology familiar, keep facts at the centre
Price of PV and wind turbines goes down
+3 C warming becomes a fact
500 PPM .. 1000 PPM CO2
“Basic energy income”
Pilots:-Blockchain-District heating
New consensus –new “truth”
Environmental and energy values (readings) made visible by sensors
Filtering masks for outdoor activities when CO2- levels are too high
Citizen –driven initiatives for new laws concerning renewable energy
From polarisation to a new consensus
Engagement and involvement of citizens
Citizen engagement and involvement happens through digitalisation
Internet of energy
Markets are where there is scarcity
Markets of change
Climate “Pearl Harbour” reassessment of the sovereignty of nations
Basic income (perustulo)
What is the “Neo-Carbon Maternity package” that can be shipped off to the world?
Co-ownership of wind farms
Spearhead projects
R&D support for both large and small companies
Business funding and venture capital
Entrepreneurship
Operational environment
“Pasi –ideology” (radical thinking)
Courage to renew oneself
Government programs 2019-232023-272027-31
Parliamentary elections 201920232027
Increased understanding and identification of the benefits for each party
Getting away from culture of insignificant small-scale actions
Types of actors, e.g. Actor (list who?) Make notes on role
Change needed/Driver
Barriers Timeline (<5 years, ~10 years, 20-30 years)
Importance (low, medium, high)
Businesses VCs, Startups (e.g. CO2 esto, Joukon Voima), renewablefunds
New business ideasthat foster green growth, investment in green technologies
Market mechanism: investing in a cleaner future means everyoneget the benefit –howcan the investor profit?
Starting now; veryimportant over the next 15 years
Important now to get the ball rolling.
Research and technology
Methane synthesis, CO2 capture and utilisation
Driver: the need forenergy-intensive fuels with no emissions.
Expenses. How to attract investments?
Research now under way. Commercial solutions available in 2050.
High
Authorities Legal: make laws enabling of a C-neutral future; Political: promote not only ecological but also social and economical sustainability
Large changes needed, consistency in policy is important, important not to forget about other societal aspects when pushing for the big emission reductions
Polarized political playing field, protectionism, fear, alternative facts.
From now until the goals are reached
Very high
Organisations, NGOs
CLC, WWF, S&C Important in showing the way and creating momentum
New services Maas, bank card that measures your emissions, energy as a service
Empower and engage consumers.
New meters & infrastructure needed for energy as a service?
<5 years, more for energy as a service
Important now to get the ball rolling. Could be veryimportant in 2050?
Consumers Online communities (Uusi energiapolitiikka, energiaremontti),VCs, city “champions”, crowd funding of RES
Driver: people’s will to participate & do good
Bureaucracy, knowledge gap: what actually needs doing?
Starting now, growing in importance over time
Increasing over time.
Actors classified:What actors could be needed to enable ”NeoCarbon style” energy system transformation?
35Timeline Ideas about who the actors arethat came up in many groups
New ideas for who or what the actors could be
Existingalready
The Neo-Carbon Energy project and brand Maas (Mobility As A Service)
Startups: EkoRent, Joukon Voima, CO2-esto Non-energy companies enter the market (e.g. Telia Sonera)
Mobility and energy as a service Trial culture (for instance “Nopeat kokeilut” in the Climate Street project)
Communities (e.g. “Uusi Energiapolitiikka”, Energiaremontti, different Facebook groups, energy producing communities and local food –circles)
“City champions” and “energy awards” –new role models in ecological and green lifestyles and leadership are recognized and awarded publicly
Fortum fund
2020 - 2030 V2X (from vehicle to X) –EV:s as mobile electricity storage to increase flexibility
Changes in dietary habits
Citizens have become empowered by digitalization (e.g. increased demand response through a mobile application, increased awareness)
Finland has the image of being an attractive environment for companies and for RES investments, e.g. Tesla cold weather tests, Google data centres..
2050 Cyber security is an important issue and it is connected to the way our societies get their energy; more distributed for safety reasons? Off-grid solutions?
Carbon sink and –reuse companies, industry as a carbon provider
EV Uber / private car ownership and driving has decreased significantly in the OECD
Emissions steer decisions in the same way as prices do today
Grassroots leaders / communities have more power
36EXISTING Ideas about who the actors arethat came up in many groups
New ideas for who or what the actors could be
The Neo-Carbon Energy project and brand Maas (Mobility As A Service)
Startups: EkoRent, Joukon Voima, CO2-esto Non-energy companies enter the market (e.g. Telia Sonera)
Mobility and energy as a service Trial culture (for instance “Nopeat kokeilut” in the Climate Street project)
Fortum fund “City champions” and “energy awards” –new role models in ecological and green lifestyles and leadership are recognized and awarded publicly
Communities (e.g. “Uusi Energiapolitiikka”, Energiaremontti, different Facebook groups, energy producing communities and local food –circles)
372020-2030 Ideas about who the actors arethat came up in many groups
New ideas for who or what the actors could be
V2X (from vehicle to X) –EV:s as mobile electricity storage to increase flexibility
Changes in dietary habits
Citizens have become empowered by digitalization (e.g. increased demand response through a mobile application, increased awareness)
Finland has the image of being an attractive environment for companies and for RES investments, e.g. Tesla cold weather tests, Google data centres..
382050 Ideas about who the actors arethat came up in many groups
New ideas for who or what the actors could be
Cyber security is an important issue and it is connected to the way our societies get their energy; more distributed for safety reasons? Off-grid solutions?
Carbon sink and –reuse companies, industry as a carbon provider
EV Uber / private car ownership and driving has decreased significantly in the OECD
Emissions steer decisions in the same way as prices do today
Grassroots leaders / communities have more power
NCE WORKSHOP 23.2.2017
6.4.2017VTT
Workshop summaryPart II:
Conclusions based on presentations of groups
Results summarized based on summaries of groups: Task 1• Who are or could be the pioneer actors today – existing and
imaginary. Especially, identify the most important actors to makeFinland a front-runner and ”net beneficiary” in climate changemitigation.
• What products and services do they offer? What are industrial organisations like? How do they operate to reach their goals? Etc. (2020-30)
• How could the actor(s) develop by 2050? What could the business ecosystem be like in 2050?
Results emphasized by Group I • Ways to operate, drivers
– Financial instruments; – Food habits, vertical cultivation– Emission-free as a value, the role of new generations– Self-sufficiency
• Key actors– international and national funds– crowdfunding
• Key technological enablers/breakthrough– Storages, cabling– EVs, transportation– Off-grid solutions– Genetic engineering– Artificial intelligence– Cyber security– Fusion?
• The role of new technologieshighlighted
• Funding and related organisations in key role
• Both financial logics and valuesassessed as drivers
Results emphasized by Group II • Ways to operate: drivers
– Financial innovations– Everything as a service, service layer, creation of services– Gamification, communications– CCU: industry as a catbon producer– Market mechanism, earning logic– Glocal ecosystem (Global + Local)
• Key technological enablers/breakthrough– Electric Vehicle development, autonomous vehicles, Uber-taxi– Local storages– Distributed generation: solar– Artificial intelligence, robots– District heating network– LULUCF
• Key actors– The Minister for Foreign Trade and Development– Energiaremonttiryhmä
(A group on Parliament Members ‘Energy Renovation’)– United Nations– Funding foundations– Heureka science centre– ’NCE’ ambassadors– Cities, buildings as an actor– Good examples, e.g. energy efficiency– Personal trainers for citizens– Consumer
• Pioneer actors named in a concreteway from wide range of society. Mostly, they fall under categories of policy, public, or citizen movenmentactors
• The logics for development largelybased on identified, existing actorsand foreseeable development.
Results emphasized by Group III • Ways to operate: drivers
– A model of interaction considered (see separate slide)– Businesses act only if economic feasibility is in sight– Citizens’ role important; regional democracy, Switzerland(/Honecker?)– Regulation, taxes– Pricing models – Energiewende; long road behid, public acceptance originates from anti-nuclear movement – Energiewende vs Welfare state; willingness to pay – Energy Memory– Public opinion -> gasoline, diesel: brand in Western Europe– Media / Stuttgart; renewing media; education; 1 truth?
• Key technological enablers/breakthrough– Technical functionality of Electric Vehicles
• Key actors– Citizens– Smart & Clean foundation– Facts, research (means to impact)
• Public acceptance and citizens seenas a prime movers to becomeforerunners
• A willigness to pay for new solutionsis rooted in events even decades ago(”Energy memory”). This may drivepoliticians, businesses and development and take-up of new solutions.
Results summarized based on notes on summaries by groups:
Task 2• Identify the actions in different sectors of society needed to
make your vision happen (so that the actor(s) prosper)
Results summarized / emphasized by Group I • Change in electricity market• Guarantee of origin• Citizen learning• Choosing a form of energy• Steering effect• GM food products • Negative labeling• Learning• Normal vs abnormal (social “pressure”)• Institutional learning• Change -> Marketplace• Global Paris Agreement => Tragedy of the Commons
– OPEC – even the powerful cartel having problems in lifting the price 5$ up – Free-rider problem
• Methane emission shock Need for some shocking event • Winners & losers
– Northern Sea Route• Instead of CO2, local pollution as a drivers in big cities Paris, London, China • 1. Methane shock -> not enough• Multilateral world order • 2. No more consensus
– Fragmented, tribalised world– 50-60a Washington consensus– Trump’s USA: withdrawal from international collaboration&agreements
• 3. Hegemony -> who monitors?
• Actions driven by increasingly byevents in multilateral and dispersedworld
• Changes in electricity marketsnecessary for needed actions
• Institutional and citizen learningessential
Results summarized / emphasized by Group II • Getting rid of subsidies -> EVs?• Threat, bribe, blackmail• Use of strong words by institutional leaders such as ban• Economic actions -> carbon tax to reflect real costs of CO2 (40€/t?)• What do you get from carbon tax?• Less subsidies, more taxation• Social side -> personalised energy• Gas infra• Labeling• Neo-carbon party; blue-green business party• Finland as a front-runner; campaigns• “Model citizens” – Emma gala • Built environment: solar, wind• Pricing right (50$/ton)• 1.4% - tax pollution
• Actions under control of bygovernments – such as taxes, subsidies, labeling, most highlighted
• Institutional leadership, campaignsmentioned as softer actions to makethe change happen
Results summarized / emphasized by Group III • Involve• Concretize• Electoral terms + Governmental Programmes• Goal and Vision Common path• Pioneer ideas• Negative threat to impact everyday life: filters to remove extra CO2?• Diesel/gasoline• New businesses => Climate Pearl Harbour• Markets of change• Citizen-driven
• The next electroral terms and Governmental Programmes as concrete steps for actions. ”ClimatePearl Harbour”: a big, unexpectedevent to turn the atmosphere.
• Citized-driven actions: involvementand concretization. Negative threat to impact everyday life of citizens as a potential attitude changer.