freshwater water quality Pacific oysters 2 LU/LC scenarios: 1.Status quo 2.Future climate (Envision) freshwater Freshwater Yield & Nutrient Loading Demand Average Annual Discharge Compared To USGS and WADOE gauge observations Average Annual Discharge Compared To USGS and WADOE gauge observations 2006 Snapshot: Land Cover Available Water Content Soil Depth Topography Watersheds Sub-Watersheds Snapshot: Land Cover Available Water Content Soil Depth Topography Watersheds Sub-Watersheds Annual Values: Precipitation Potential Evapotranspiration Annual Values: Precipitation Potential Evapotranspiration LU Tables: Rooting Depth Plant ET coefficient Water Demand LU Tables: Rooting Depth Plant ET coefficient Water Demand SAMPLE OUTPUT water quality Water quality model v.1 Skokomish Duckabush Hamma Dosewallips Big Quilcene Little Quilcene Big Beef Creek SAMPLE OUTPUT High Water Quality Low Water Quality 0%20%40%60%80%100% Water Quality Index (relative to the source contaminant of fecal coliform) A. BaselineC. Industry ExpansionB. Conservation Water quality model v. 2 Pacific oysters Pacific Oyster Production Model $: Commercial and Recreational SAMPLE OUTPUT: SQ harvest volume Shellfish harvest SAMPLE OUTPUT: scenarios