Radio astronomy with the Lunar Lander: opening up the last unexploredfrequency regime.

Marc Klein Wolta,b,∗, Amin Aminaeia, Philippe Zarkac, Jan-Rutger Schraderd, Albert-JanBoonstrae, Heino Falckea

aAstronomical Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, Heijendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The NetherlandsbScience & Technology, Olof Palmestraat 14, 2616 LR Delft, The Netherlands

cLaboratoire d’etudes Spatiales et d’Instrumentation en Astrophysique (LESIA) Observatoire de Paris, Section deMeudon 5, Place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex France

dNetherlands Institute for Space Research (SRON), Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA, Utrecht, The NetherlandseNetherlands Institute for Radio Astronomy (Astron), Oude Hoogeveensedijk 4, 7991 PD, Dwingeloo, The

Netherlands

Abstract

The moon is a unique location in our solar system and provides important information regarding theexposure to free space that is essential for future human space exploration to mars and beyond. Theactive broadband (1 kHz−100 MHz) tripole antenna now envisaged to be placed on the EuropeanLunar Lander located at the Lunar South Pole allows for sensitive measurements of the exosphereand ionosphere, and their interaction with the Earths magnetosphere, solar particles, wind andCMEs and studies of radio communication on the moon, that are essential for future lunar humanand science exploration. In addition, the lunar South pole provides an excellent opportunity forradio astronomy. Placing a single radio antenna in an eternally dark crater or behind a mountainat the south (or north) pole would potentially provide perfect shielding from man-made radiointerference (RFI), absence of ionospheric distortions, and high temperature and antenna gainstability that allows detection of the 21 cm wave emission from pristine hydrogen formed after thebig bang and into the period where the first stars formed. A detection of the 21 cm line from themoon at these frequencies would allow for the first time a clue on the distribution and evolutionon mass in the early universe between the Epoch of Recombination and Epoch of Reionization(EoR). Next to providing a cosmological breakthrough, a single lunar radio antenna would allowfor studies of the effect of solar flares and Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs) on the solar windat distances close to earth (space weather) and would open up the study of low frequency radioevents (flares and pulses) from planets such as Jupiter and Saturn, which are known to emit bright(kJy−MJy) radio emission below 30 MHz (Jester and Falcke, 2009). Finally, a single radio antennaon the lunar lander would pave the way for a future large lunar radio interferometer; not only will itdemonstrate the possibilities for lunar radio science and open up the last unexplored radio regime,but it will also allow a determination of the limitations of lunar radio science by measuring thelocal radio background noise.

Keywords:Lunar Exploration, Lunar ionosphere, Radio Astronomy, Cosmology

Preprint submitted to Planetary Space Science, accepted for publication May 21, 2018

arX

iv:1

209.

3033

v1 [

astr

o-ph

.IM

] 1

3 Se

p 20

12

1. Introduction

The European Lunar Lander ELL missionis an exploratory ESA mission that aims at in-vestigating the conditions on the Lunar surfacefor future human missions and science projects.The primary objective of the Lunar Lander isto prove ESA’s capabilities of performing a softprecision landing in the moon, and once on themoon the Lunar Lander will perform a numberof scientific studies. The L-DEPP (Lunar DustEnvironment and Plasma Package) package isone of the proposed instrument packages to beplaced on the Lunar Lander and it consists ofthree instruments: a radio antenna (Lunar Ra-dio eXperiment - LRX), dust camera and Lang-muir probe to measure the lunar electromag-netic fields and waves, lunar dust and plasma,respectively. The radio antenna was also a con-sequence of our early proposal for ESA’s Explo-ration architecture studies to build a lunar low-frequency radio array (Lunar LOFAR) where itwas intended as a path-finder instrument prov-ing the capabilities of low-frequency astronomy(below ∼ 30 MHz).

The ELL will land on one of the predefinedlanding sites on the Lunar South Pole. TheSouth Pole was chosen based on arguments re-lated to power (sunlight) and communication(Earth visibility) but also as it has not beenexplored before and offers unique opportuni-ties for future human exploration (e.g. resourcemining, see Gardini, 2011). For the work pre-sented here we will assume the South Pole lo-cation as a fixed parameter. The LRX offersunique scientific opportunities but it should benoted that these science cases are not drivingthe ELL mission.

Here we would like to present a concept de-sign for, and review the relevance of a singletripole radio antenna on board the Lunar Lan-der on the a Lunar South Pole location, not

∗Corresponding authorEmail address: M.KleinWolt@astro.ru.nl (Marc

Klein Wolt)

only from the lunar exploration perspective butalso highlighting the unique opportunities suchan radio antenna offer for low frequency radioastronomy and cosmology. For a more detaileddescription of the science cases that support aspace-based or lunar low frequency radio an-tenna we refer to (Jester and Falcke, 2009).

2. Opportunities provided by the LunarLander

The moon is a unique and still relatively lit-tle studied place in our solar system. FromESA’s exploratory perspective the moon is thenext step after the ISS for pursuing explorationof the universe, and provides the ideal locationto test human habitation and scientific explo-ration in preparation for a future mars mis-sion. However, the extreme conditions on themoon have to be taken into account for anymission to the surface. The moon is known forhaving a significant dust layer and, in combi-nation with the absence of a significant atmo-sphere, provides a unique interface between adusty surface and free space. In addition, themoon is subjected to large temperature varia-tions (caused by night and day variations), isexposed to comic ray and solar wind plasmaand interacts with the Earth magnetotail. Allthis has a large impact on the lunar ionosphereand plasma and affects conditions below andabove the lunar surface. For example, it is ob-vious that levitating dust plays a crucial andpotentially hazardous role for surface opera-tions. However, how does the dust get thereand where does it go? In fact, the dusty sur-face plasma will not end just a few metersabove the surface. Since a few decades weknow, for example, that the moon has an ex-osphere. It is generally believed that the ions,which make up this exosphere, are generatedat the Moon’s surface by interaction with solarUV photons, plasma in the Earth’s magneto-sphere, or micrometeorites (see Reasoner andBurke 1972, Benson et al. 1975 and references

2

therein). Apart from direct in-situ measure-ments this exosphere has been seen with radioobservations, revealing a variable plasma fre-quency in the 100 kHz regime during daytime.

One of the main scientific objectives is to in-vestigate the interplay between the dust, theelectromagnetic fields and lunar plasma on theone hand and the effects of the earth’s magneticfields, solar light and plasma, and cosmic rayand (micro-) meteorites. The synergy betweenthe three instruments proposed to comprise L-DEPP provides a unique opportunity to studythese effects. As explained above, the solar UVand X ray photons are predicted to create apositively charged surface and a dusty plasmasheet on the day side, through the combined ef-fects of photo electron emissions and low con-ductivity of the lunar regolith. Pick-up ionsand solar wind electrons should create a lunarionosphere that is more extended on the nightside; a night side that has a negatively chargedsurface as an interface to the ionosphere thatgradually becomes a near perfect vacuum in-side the lunar wake (see also Fig. 1 and 2).The generated electric fields should often dom-inate the Lorentz force, breaking MHD plasmaequilibrium and enabling levitation of dust andtransport of dust and plasma across the ter-minator. It is far from clear, though, how allthese processes work in detail. Clearly, placingthe three L-DEPP instruments on the SouthPole of the Moon would allow for detailed in-situ measurements and remote sensing of theeffects, which should provide significantly moreinsight into the underlying processes

The radio antenna as part of the L-DEPPpackage will study the variations in the vari-ations in the lunar exosphere, the lunar ra-dio background, and the effect of high-energycosmic rays that interact with the Lunar sur-face, predominantly in combination with mea-surements from the dust camera and Langmuirprobe. In that respect the radio antenna offersthe unique capability to perform remote sens-ing measurements, that will complement the

in-situ capabilities of the L-DEPP package. Inaddition, the LRX will investigate the use of ra-dio communication on the moon. The low fre-quency radiation is able to penetrate throughthe lunar regolith or crater rims; it can be re-flected from the lunar surface or even the lu-nar exosphere. And finally, using the radio an-tenna as passive ground-penetrating radar, thereflected radiation provides information aboutthe lunar surface and sub-surfaces.

The LRX radio antenna plays a crucial rolein investigating the lunar conditions for hu-man exploration, but furthermore offers uniqueopportunities for low frequency radio astron-omy: a single antenna placed on the moonwould be a pathfinder mission for radio as-tronomy and address pending cosmological is-sues. Placing a broad-band and low frequency(∼kHz−100MHz) radio antenna on the moonwould be the demonstration and site-testingmission required to make large low-frequencyradio antenna systems in space possible. How-ever, LRX would also detect the Askaryan ef-fect from cosmic rays and make a serious at-tempt at detecting the global dark ages andEOR signal. The main limitation for the lat-ter is the unknown interference situation at apolar landing site, where the Earth would setonly occasionally during the mission. A futurelarge radio synthesis antenna with many moreindividual nodes and baselines of a few kilo-meters would be required to perform detailedcosmological studies such as the EoR tomogra-phy and the determining the power spectrumof the 21-cm line at redshifts of 30 − 50, aswell as for instance the study of high redshiftgalaxies and quasars and fossil radio galaxies.

2.1. South Pole Location

A strong argument in favor of measurementson the lunar South Pole is the possibility tostudy the effects of the solar wind and theEarth’s magnetosphere on the lunar wake. Asexplained above, the Moon is embedded in thesolar wind plasma which creates a wake on thelunar night side. The wake is basically a bubble

3

NS

Light Shadow

Figure 1: The changing lunar wake boundary at thelocation of the Lunar Lander site at the South Pole ofthe Moon. The red dot corresponds to the location ofthe Lunar Lander. The image on the top-left shows theoverall situation of the Moon embedded in the inter-planetary magnetic field (IMF) and solar wind plasma,the light shadow and the wake. The images on theright-hand side correspond to the light-grey rectangu-lar shown in the top-left figure. The changes in theplasma of the sun and the rotation of the Moon changethe location of the boundary wake and place the LunarLander inside and outside of the wake.

in the supersonic solar wind plasma and is oneof the best vacuums in our local space environ-ment: measurements by the WIND spacecraftshowed that the electron density in the wakeis less than 0.01cm3 (Ogilvie and Parks, 1996,and see Fig. 1). The LRX can observe the Lu-nar wake through the plasma turbulence thatis created at the boundary wake and result inemission at both low and high frequencies.

Figure 1 shows the shape of the lunar wakeand the location of the boundary on the lu-nar surface in the South Pole area. The shapeand location can change under the influenceof changes in the solar wind plasma and theEarth’s magnetic field, to the extreme casewhen the wake completely disappears; that is,when the Moon is completely embedded in themagnetosphere. This change in shape and lo-cation is shown as I and II in the figure: achange in the wake will cause the Lunar Lan-der to move in and out of the wake. Hence,the South Pole location would provide an ex-

cellent location for studying the impact of thesolar wind plasma and the Earth’s magneto-sphere on the local Lunar environment (on theSouth Pole): the changes in the wake have a di-rect impact on the density of the local plasmaand its plasma frequency and even a fixed lo-cation would still allow for plasma and iono-spheric measurements in and outside the wake.

As presented in Figure 2, the lunar SouthPole is an ideal location as it provides a con-tinuous view of the lunar ionosphere above thedark and sunlit side of the Moon. This is themain advantage over a day-side or night-side lo-cation were only one instance of the ionospherecan be observed. Understanding the effects ofboth the solar UV photons as well as the inter-action with plasma electrons are crucial for theformation of the ionosphere, the electric andmagnetic characteristics of the Moon and theformation of the lunar dusty plasma sheet.

It is not within the scope of this work toargue for or against specific landing sites, e.g.North Pole or equator, instead we provide anoverview of the scientific possibilities that theLRX provide at the Lunar South Pole. Whatmakes the ELL unique and the South Pole andideal location, compared to for instance space-based alternatives, is the possibility to per-form in-situ measurements on the Lunar en-vironment and the possibility of performinglow-frequency radio observations, in particu-lar the 21-cm cosmology. We will present amore quantitative analysis on the landing siterequirements including an analysis of the ex-pected RFI levels, in a forthcoming paper.

3. Lunar Exploration with the LRX

From the Lunar Exploration point of viewthere are a number of interesting science issueson which the LRX can provide an essential con-tribution. In this section we present these insome more detail.

4

Solar UV radiation

Day

Electric �eld near the South Pole

Plasma electrons in the solar windand earth magnetosphere

Night

Day Side Ionsphere

Night Side Ionsphere

Figure 2: Day and night difference on the lunar SouthPolar location: solar UV radiation causes the lunar sur-face to be positively charged on the day-side (a fewVolts, extending up to ∼ 1meter in height), on thenight-side the interaction with plasma electrons (fromthe solar wind and the earth’s magnetosphere) causesthe surface to become negative (∼ 100V, extending upto ∼ 1 km). This causes a strong electric field on thesouth and north pole. In addition the moon is con-stantly exposed to micrometeorites and cosmic rays.

3.1. Lunar Ionosphere

The issue of a possible lunar ionosphere hasarisen from the intriguing dual frequency radarmeasurements from the Luna 22 spacecraft.They indicated that a rather dense plasma sur-rounds the Moon up to about 50 km from thesurface (Vyshlov, 1976). Electron number den-sities as large as 2000 cm−3 were inferred fromthe measured plasma column contents, whichsuggested that the Moon indeed has a denseionosphere that could interact readily with thesurrounding solar wind or geo-tail plasma. Themass loading of the geo-tail by such an iono-sphere, if true, could be enough to cause largedisturbances and even cause auroral stormscloser to Earth. However, a reinterpretation ofthe Luna 22 data by Bauer (Bauer, 1996), inlight of the previously neglected very effectiveion pick-up transport process expected to oc-cur near the Moon by the solar wind, suggeststhat no ionospheric layer of any significanceis to be expected around the Moon. Instead,the Luna 22 measurements are interpreted as a

result of a photo electron layer near the sur-face, in support of the ALSEP observations(Reasoner and O’Brien, 1972). This contro-versy is confirmed by more recent radio occul-tation measurements using SMART-1, Cassini,Venus Express (Pluchino et al., 2008) and theSELENE radio experiment (Imamura et al.,2008). Pluchino et al. (2008) find electron den-sity numbers in agreement with in-situ mea-surements by the US Apollo missions, whileImamura et al. (2008) find electron densitiesin the order of 1000 cm−3 on the day side,much higher then the predicted 1 cm−3. Morerecently, Goto et al. (2011) suggests a newmethod for examining the lunar ionosphere byusing the propagation of AKR radio emission.Their first results using this new method showsno evidence for a high electron density layernear the lunar surface. Clearly, the presentproposal to make careful in-situ measurementsof the lunar ionosphere using LRX in combina-tion with the other instruments in the L-DEPPpackage, will provide better insights and con-firm or deny the conclusions arrived at earlier.

Little is yet known on the lunar ionospherebut that is likely to change rather soon due tothe presence of the two ARTEMIS spacecraftin lunar orbits and the launch of the LunarAtmosphere and Dust Environment Explorer(LADEE) in 2013. The ARTEMIS spacecraftthat were sent to the Moon stem from themmagnetospheric THEMIS mission, which con-sisted of four satellites. Although not originallyintended as a Moon mission, the two spacecraftare fully equipped with modern plasma instru-ments and plan to go as low as 15 km above thesurface during several orbits, and, as its nameimplies, the main objective of the LADEE mis-sion is to characterize the lunar atmosphereand dust environment. However, althoughdata from the ARTEMIS and LADEE missionswill be of extremely high value for the lunarscience community and for future L-DEPP sci-ence planning, both missions employ equatorialorbits and cannot perform any measurements

5

above the poles, neither are they stationary:only a polar lander mission can accomplish thescience goals set up by L-DEPP, which makesthe European Lunar Lander unique.

It is currently believed that the lunar iono-sphere is composed of ions, released from thelunar surface through interactions with the so-lar UV radiation in a process known as ionpick-up, and electrons in the solar wind and theEarth’s magnetosphere (see for instance Welland Barasch, 1962). Its heavier constituentsare likely due to impacts of high-energy cosmicrays and micrometeorites. The density profileand physical extent of the lunar ionosphere arestill unknown. In addition, large variations inthe electron density are known to occur. Asshown in Fig. 2 the physical extent of the iono-sphere is different on the day side and nightside, mainly caused by the strong effect of thesolar UV radiation (ion pick-up) on the day-side and the interaction with plasma electronsfrom the solar wind and earth magnetic fieldon the night-side. The lunar ionosphere andits variations caused by the presence or ab-sence of the Earth’s magnetosphere, gradualchanges in the solar wind speed and interplan-etary shocks due to solar flares and CoronalMass Ejections (CME), and impacts of cosmicrays and micrometeorites have never been stud-ied in-situ. However, on the lunar day-sidea variable plasma frequency greater than 100kHz has been revealed by radio observations.Note that the presence of (charged) dust mov-ing through the ionosphere of the moon couldeffect the local radio background noise as theirdischarges are detected as they interfere withthe ELL and the LRX, see for instance Stubbset al. (2007). Determining the size, speed andconcentration of the dust in the lunar iono-sphere is being addressed by the Dust Camerawhich is part of the L-DEPP package.

To obtain high sensitivity, a radio telescoperequires long term stability. In order to assessradio astronomy from the Moon, it is thereforeimportant that the LRX antenna can sense nar-

rowband interferences (narrow-band featuresare expected to be present in the lunar plasma,in the same way as they are predicted to oc-cur in the Earth’s atmosphere, see Allan andPoulter, 1992) as well as any fast temporalchanges. These would be flagged and laterremoved from the astronomical data. How-ever, one man’s noise is another man’s sig-nal. Narrowband emissions as well as tran-sients are important ingredients in the lunarradio background. Although the plasma fre-quency in the solar wind is only about 10 Hz,which is difficult to measure with a short an-tenna, it could potentially be as high as 3 MHzon the surface, if the plasma density measure-ments made by Apollo ALSEP were correct.The plasma frequency would show up as lo-cally generated, rather narrow band, Langmuirwave emission, or as an abrupt cut-off in the inthe remote radio spectrum. It is also possiblethat nonlinear plasma waves on the harmon-ics of the plasma frequency are emitted. Fur-thermore, Auroral kilometric radiation (AKR)from Earth is rather broadband and can goup to 1 MHz. The AKR can be very strongand should be detectable even with a relativelyshort antenna. There are also the strong coher-ent broadband radio bursts from the Sun andfrom other radio planets than Earth, the Jo-vian decametric radiation in particular, whichcan last up to one hour. While not desirable forradio astronomy, the non-thermal radio emis-sion from Earth and Jupiter are most usefulsince they would appear as mostly circularlypolarized point sources. This makes it pos-sible to perform direction finding from a sin-gle location using three mutually orthogonaldipole or monopole antennas (Carozzi et al.,2000, Bergman et al, Swedish Patent No. 512219 (2000), US Patent No. 6,407,702 (2002)),which in turn makes it possible to estimate thetotal electron content in the direction of thesource. Ionospheric tomography could be car-ried out as the Sun or the radio planets travelacross the lunar sky. Note that, given that ob-

6

jects like planets and the Sun will only be vis-ible a few degrees above the local horizon (de-pending on the exact landing site) due to theSouth Pole location,the Ionospheric variationsmay possibly interfere with the actual scientificobservations of these objects.

3.2. Lunar impacts

Monitoring the temporal radio backgroundcould potentially be used to directly measureimpacts of high-speed dust particles and micro-meteorites. During the Cassini mission ringcrossings, for instance, dust-particles hittingthe spacecraft were detected as spikes by theradio antennas. The lunar surface provides aneven larger collecting area. However, how thisplays out on the Moon is uncertain. It wouldbe surprising, however, if a sudden impact, cre-ating a very hot plasma cloud, would not alsolead to an electromagnetic pulse that could bedetected at low frequencies. One can ask a sim-ilar but more speculative question about pos-sible discharges. If indeed, the lunar surfaceis strongly charged and the charging is relatedto solar radiation, strong potential differencesshould exist between dark and bright areas.Note that the LRX would be able to deter-mine the Direction of Arrival (DOA) with a fewdegrees accuracy (see Section4.4). Again, theprovision of charged particles (e.g. through animpact or spontaneously) could lead to staticdischarges that would be detectable as a ra-dio hiss anywhere in the 1 − 100 MHz regime.This effect has never been studied in any detailand is a bit venturing into unknown territory.After all, there has never been a modern broad-band receiver on the Moon, which could havedetected and localized such events. Also, oneneeds a large surface without atmosphere to seethis in the first place and hence other planetsare of no use either. If charging of the surfaceplays a role, such effects should be strongestnear the terminator and near the poles andwould have been much less pronounced duringApollo sortie missions.

If a micro-meteoroid hits the lander or theregolith nearby, a plasma cloud is formed in-stantaneously, producing a strong EMP witha broad frequency spectrum that can be mea-sured by LPX and LRX. The electrical effectsof meteoroids on spacecraft systems are notwell known and this provides a valuable insitu measurement. The pulse width and am-plitude of the radio emission contains informa-tion about the plasma formation and expan-sion caused by the impact, which can be usedto infer the mass and velocity of the meteoroid.More specifically it can address the a) chargeproduction b) length scale c) plasma tempera-ture d) ionization efficiency and e) plasma ex-pansion speed (Close et al., 2010). It is alsoestimated that radio emissions have a peak atlow to medium frequencies so the LPX probesand LRX antennas would use the LF and MFbands of LRX to sense and attempt to localizethe events.

3.3. Lunar radio communication

Low frequency radio transmission could alsobe considered for over-the horizon emergencycommunication for future surface sorties, i.e.if a manned or unmanned rover accidentallyor purposely comes in a situation where thereis no line of sight communication to a basestation/lander and direct to Earth or satellitecommunication are impossible or have failed.In this case a low-frequency beacon may be de-sirable. After all, low-frequency radiation canpenetrate deep through the regolith or craterrims, may refract over the surface, or may evenbe reflected by a lunar exosphere. On the otherhand, shielding of radio emission by mountainsor crates may actually be required by futureradio telescopes.

These effects have been modeled to somedegree but at low frequencies they are notwell understood, since these models suffer fromthe fact that the wavelengths become of thescale of tens of meters to actually kilometersand hence are much larger than any sampleever brought back to Earth (see for instance

7

Figure 3: Typical space/lunar- and earth-based fre-quency regimes.

Takahashi, 2003). Moreover, the dusty plasmasheet close to the surface will likely also playa significant role for the propagation of radiowaves parallel to the surface. Radio propa-gation effects on the lunar surface at low fre-quencies cannot be probed with Earth-basedlow-frequency radars. Even if they could pene-trate the ionosphere, which is sometimes possi-ble even below 10 MHz, it would be impossibleto tell if any detectable radio wave propaga-tion effects were due to the lunar environmentor caused by Earth’s ionosphere, the latter be-ing most likely. Hence, studies of radio wavepropagation on the lunar surface have to becarried out on site. One method to measurethe radio wave propagation effects on site isto observe the setting of a strong radio source,such as Jupiter or the Earth below the hori-zon. Such observations will be carried out rou-tinely to perform ionospheric tomography butas the radio source sets, propagation effects dueto the lunar geography should start to play adominating role.

4. Low Frequency Radio Astronomywith the LRX

The currently planned ground-based tele-scopes will provide a serious advance in ra-dio astronomy and extend the accessible fre-quencies to the widest range possible from theground. As illustrated by Fig. 3, Earth’s iono-sphere gives rise to ”radio seeing”, makingground-based radio imaging of the sky diffi-cult at frequencies below ∼ 100 MHz. Ateven longer wavelengths, in the 10 − 30 MHz

range, one often encounters severe ionosphericturbulence and Faraday rotation, and below∼ 10 MHz the ionospheric cut-off blocks incom-ing radio waves completely, prohibiting any ra-dio astronomical observations whatsoever. Ob-serving just above the cut-off, i.e., between ∼10−30 MHz is sometimes possible but to obtainany decent images requires especially favorablegeomagnetic and ionospheric conditions, whichusually does not last for very long time periodsand therefore limits the sensitivity of the obser-vations. The frequency range below the cut-off can only be observed from space. Hence,the dominant low-frequency (long-wavelength)regime for which ground-based telescopes arebeing designed is at frequencies above 30 MHz(wavelengths below 10 m). Even above thisfrequency, there are windows with strong ra-dio frequency interferences (RFI), e.g. FM ra-dio broadcasting stations in the 80 − 120 MHzband, which cannot be used for radio astron-omy.

The best resolution achieved so far in therange below ∼ 30 MHz is on the scale of around5 degrees, but more typically of order tensof degrees. This compares rather unfavorablyto the milli-arcsecond resolution that can beroutinely obtained in very long baseline inter-ferometry (VLBI) at higher radio frequencies.Hence, the low-frequency Universe is the worstcharted part of the radio spectrum, and per-haps even of the entire electromagnetic spec-trum. By today, only two kinds of maps of thesky have been made at frequencies below 30MHz. The first are maps of a part of the south-ern sky near the Galactic center such as thoseobtained by Cane and Whitham (1977), Ellisand Mendillo (1987), Cane and Erickson (2001)from Tasmania. These have angular resolu-tions ranging from 5 to 30 degrees. The secondkind are maps obtained by the RAE-2 satellite(Novaco and Brown, 1978) with angular reso-lution of 30 degrees or worse. None of thesemaps show individual sources other than dif-fusive synchrotron emission of the Galaxy, nor

8

Figure 4: Shielding of terrestrial radio interference bythe moon, as observed by the RAE-2 satellite. Even at adistance of 300,000 km from the Earth, the additionalshielding by the Moon provides 1-3 orders of magni-tude (10-30 dB) of additional interference suppression.Taken from Alexander et al. (1975, c© ESO)

do they cover the entire sky. Even though thenew LOFAR telescope will attempt to improveon this at frequencies above 10 MHz, lower fre-quencies remain off limit.

To improve this situation and to overcomethese limitations, space-based low-frequencytelescopes are required for all observationsbelow the ionospheric cutoff (Weiler, 1987,Weiler et al., 1988, Kassim and Weiler, 1990).This is also true for a significant part of theseeing-affected frequency range above the cut-off frequency where high-resolution and high-dynamic range observations are required, suchas imaging of 21-cm emission of neutral hydro-gen in the very early Universe (Carilli et al.,2007).

So far, there have only been two spacemissions whose primary purpose was low-frequency radio astronomy: the Radio Astron-omy Explorers (RAE) 1 and 2. It was a sur-prising finding of RAE-1 that the Earth itselfis a strong emitter of low-frequency bursts, theso-called Auroral Kilometric Radiation (AKR)generated by solar-wind interactions with theEarth’s magnetic field. This emission is sostrong that RAE-2 was placed in a lunar in-stead of the originally planned terrestrial orbit

to provide shielding from this natural terres-trial interference, see Fig.4. The structure ofthe Galaxy’s emission was only seen by RAE-2at very low spatial resolution (with beam sizesbetween 37◦ × 61◦ and 220◦ × 160◦) and fairlylow signal-to-noise ratio. Due to the very lim-ited angular resolution and the large power ofAKR, it proved impossible to image any dis-crete sources directly.

Placing a low-frequency radio antenna arrayin an eternally dark crater or behind a moun-tain such as Malapert (see also Section 4.3) atthe lunar South Pole would potentially provideexcellent shielding from man-made radio inter-ference (RFI), absence of Earth’s ionosphericdistortions, and long-term antenna gain stabil-ity. That would allows for sensitive and highresolution low-frequency radio astronomy ob-servations addressing a wealth of science casesand essentially opening up the last virtuallyunexplored frequency regime for astronomy.However, as have been discussed in the pro-ceeding sections: not even the Moon is entirelyfree from distortions. Therefore, during thecourse of the routine observations of the lu-nar dust and plasma environment that are pro-posed to be performed by L-DEPP, a knowl-edge base will be built up, which allow for thefirst experimental assessment of the Moon as apotential site for such astronomical ultra-longwavelength radio observations.

Despite these environmental complications,the potential for a single tripole antenna on themoon is still large and below we summarize theastronomy science cases that we have identifiedsuch an antenna placed on a relatively stablelocation on the south pole of the moon can ad-dress (see also Jester and Falcke, 2009).

In addition to the science cases describedbelow, the LRX will open up the last virtu-ally unexplored frequency domain. This willundoubtedly lead to the discovery of new andunexpected phenomena, just like any previousnew instrument that gave access to unexploredregions of the electromagnetic spectrum have

9

done in the past.

4.1. The Radio background

The charging of the lunar surface, the dustyplasma and electromagnetic (radio) radiationmay also affect future lunar instruments andeven radio communications on the surface.For example, part of a future lunar explo-ration program will undoubtedly be the erec-tion of some larger technical and scientific ex-periments. ESA’s large Exploration Architec-ture Review mentions as a key example forscience from the Moon the construction of alow-frequency radio telescope. The reasons arethat such telescopes are easy and light-weightto build but need to be outside Earth’s iono-sphere, require shielding from RFI, and a largestable ground all of which is naturally providedby the Moon. The interesting frequency rangesfor such an array are 1 − 10 MHz, where low-frequency radiation is completely reflected bythe ionosphere of the Earth and 10−100 MHz,where the incoming phase of the radiation isdistorted by the ionosphere (similar to seeingfor optical telescopes). As preparation, one re-quires in-depth understanding of the dielectricproperties of the Moon and of the spectral andtemporal radio background.

There is a spectral component to the radiobackground which simply comes from the vari-ations of the lunar exosphere. Below 1 MHzthe AKR of the Earth dominates the RFI,and above 1 MHz solar Type II and Type IIIbursts, associated with solar flares and CMEs,as well as the Jovian decametric radiation,would cause intermittent disturbances. Solarand AKR events may also be potential driversof lunar dust activity.

4.2. Cosmic Ray Impacts

The temporal radio background on the lunarsurface has never been studied so far. Whatmakes the Moon so different is again its largedusty surface, exposed to free space. For exam-ple, Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR)

and neutrinos will impact the Moon surface di-rectly and produce radio emission, e.g. throughthe so-called Askaryan effect (see e.g. Scholtenet al., 2006, Stal et al., 2007, Jester and Falcke,2009). Ultrahigh energy cosmic rays in partic-ular are rare, with an estimated flux of lessthan one neutrino per km2 and year over 2πsteradian, calling for a huge detector. AlreadyAskaryan himself suggested using the Moon asa detector in his original paper from 1961. OnEarth, the Antarctic ice sheet and the Mediter-ranean Sea have been used but although theAskaryan effect has been confirmed in the lab(by SLAC), it still awaits confirmation in na-ture. Nonetheless, it has already been used bya number of experiments, including two NASAballoon missions (ANITA light and ANITA)and experiments where radio telescopes ob-serve the Moon from Earth. Estimates Jesterand Falcke (2009) suggest that this can providequite a high local background, but potentiallyalso provides an interesting diagnostic tool toidentify nearby cosmic ray impacts.

4.3. Cosmology with the 21 cm Hydrogen line

A fundamental question of current cosmo-logical research is on the nature of structureformation in the Universe (for reviews, seeCiardi and Ferrara, 2005, Furlanetto et al.,2009, Pritchard and Loeb, 2010): how is theobserved distribution of visible matter cre-ated from the initial conditions just after thebig bang, when matter and radiation weredistributed extremely smoothly, with densityvariations of just one part in 100,000? TheCMB radiation was emitted at z≈ 1200, about400,000 years after the Big Bang, when theUniverse had cooled off sufficiently for elec-trons and protons to recombine into neutralhydrogen atoms, allowing the background radi-ation to move freely without being scattered bythe electrons and protons. However, althoughthere were plenty of photons, these were scat-tered randomly, there were no sources of lightin the Universe yet: the hydrogen and heliumthat were created in the big bang first had to

10

cool in order to be able to clump together andform stars and galaxies. Hence, this era iscalled the Dark Ages, in the redshift range z= 30 − 1000 (Rees, 1999).

Things only changed after the first stars,galaxies and active black holes had formedand emitted enough UV and X ray photonsto reionize the neutral hydrogen. Comparedto the epoch before Recombination, the Uni-verse had expanded so much that the plasmawas sufficiently diluted to let the radiation passfreely. The time when this happened is calledthe Epoch of Reionization (EoR) and is be-lieved to have occurred around z=11, about400 million years after the Big Bang, thoughit is at present not known whether the reion-ization happened more or less instantaneously,similar to a global phase transition, or wasmore or less spread out in time, depending onlocal conditions.

Throughout all the Dark Ages and the EoRhydrogen played a major role, emitting or ab-sorbing the well-known 21 cm (1.4 GHz) linedue to the spin flip of the electron. Today,this emission is redshifted by a factor 10−1000and lies in the 1.4− 140 MHz frequency range.When the hydrogen spin temperature is notcoupled perfectly to the radiation tempera-ture of the cosmic background radiation, butchanged by other couplings with the surround-ing matter and radiation, it can be seen againstthe cosmic background radiation in absorptionor emission, depending on whether the spintemperature is lower or higher than the back-ground radiation temperature.

4.3.1. Expected strength of the 21 cm line

Observing the cosmological 21 cm emission isthe only known method to directly probe theDark Ages and the EoR. Therefore it is sub-ject of a rapidly developing literature, which isreviewed by Furlanetto et al. (2006). Exper-imental verifications have been performed bythe EDGES experiment (Bowman and Rogers,2010) and we are aware of at least one spacemission proposal, the Dark Ages Radio Ex-

Figure 5: A simulated global 21-cm HI signal from thedark ages after 1 year of integration time with a sin-gle sky-noise limited dipole as a function of frequency(based on the calculations by Ciardi and Salvaterra,2007). Here a fixed bandwidth of 1.5 MHz is used. Weassume that the observed brightness temperature, Tobs,is just the sum of the dark ages signal and a foregroundsignal, Tfor, which is a perfect power law. The signal at30 MHz originates from z = 46.

plorer (DARE) (Burns et al., 2011, 2012) thatintends to measure the red shifted 21 cm spec-trum using an orbiter around the Moon, withthe Moon acting as a shield for RFI from Earth.

A single antenna with an instantaneous fre-quency range 10 − 200 MHz, in an eternallydark lunar crater or behind a large mountainrange at the pole, kept at a stable tempera-ture, and shielded from any solar and terres-trial radiation, would possibly offer one of thevery best set-ups for such an experiment. Thatshould reduce most instrumental and RFI ef-fects to the bare minimum and only leave thecosmic foreground as the main issue. The simu-lated 21 cm line detection with Gaussian noisein Fig. 5 shows that the signal is only 10−6

of the foreground signal. Moreover, detectionhas to rely on the foreground to be a perfectpower law. Hence, the foreground subtractionis the biggest uncertainty together with theneed for an almost perfect band-pass calibra-tion of the antenna. It is likely that the actualforeground signal will deviate from a simplepower-law. This makes detection almost im-possible if there are spectral foreground fluc-

11

tuations of the same magnitude as the darkages signal. Nonetheless, further studies needto show on which level spectral foreground fluc-tuations are actually present. As in the globalEoR case, the global dark-ages 21 cm signalis isotropic, so that a single (well-calibrated)dipole suffices to carry out this measurementand detect the signal in frequency space. Theconcept recommendation for the LRX proposesa tripole antenna consisting of three individualdipoles. This would make the tripole also threetimes more sensitive, and hence would requirethree times shorter integration time to reachthe same sensitivity.

4.3.2. expected RFI levels and attenuation atthe Lunar South Pole

With the expected signal being extremelyweak compared to the background noise, oneof the major issues is what is the expectedstrength of the RFI noise component and howmuch attenuation will the Lunar South Polelocation offer? Here we present an initial dis-cussion on this issue based on some prelimi-nary analysis that we have performed; a moredetailed analysis of the expected RFI level andsimulations of the attenuation at the ELL land-ing site taking into account all local environ-mental conditions will be presented separately.

The nominal RFI level (without attenuationby the Lunar environment) at the moon is thecombination of the component of all the man-made RFI that penetrates the Earth’s iono-sphere and the natural RFI noise (e.g. AKR).This nominal level would be very much de-pendent on the location, as one can imaginethat a strong radio transmitter beamed in theline of sight would have a large contribution.Hence, attempting to estimate this nominalRFI by using Earth-based instruments wouldnot appear to be correct. Instead, a morereliable estimate is provided by space-basedmissions such as RAE-2 (Novaco and Brown,1978), WIND/WAVES (Bougeret et al., 1995,Kaiser et al., 1996), FORTE (Burr et al., 2005).Table 1 presents the RFI levels as measured

by these instruments and from this table itis clear that comparing these results is diffi-cult as both their locations and frequency bandof observation were different. In fact, mostsurprisingly the only two missions that ob-served at similar frequencies (10 MHz), RAE-2and WIND/WAVES, show similar RFI levels(around 40 dB) while RAE-2 is about a factor2 further from Earth. This supports the ideathat the nominal RFI level depends strongly onthe location it is measured. As the RAE-2 mis-sion was in orbit around the moon, we assumea level of 40 dB above the Galactic Backgroundlevel as the nominal RFI at the Lunar SouthPole.

Table 1: Overview of RFI measurements from space-based missions. The RFI is the level in dB measureabove (positive) or below (negative) the Galactic Back-ground level. Note that for WIND/WAVES the RFIlevel measured in the two bands is very similar, i.e. dBlevels up to 40 (see Bougeret et al., 1995).

Mission Location Freq. (MHz) RFI (dB) Date

REA-2 Moon 1− 10 30− 40 1970sOrbit

WIND/ 200.000 km 6.125, < 40 1994WAVES Earth Orbit 10.325FORTE 800 km 38 40 1997

Earth OrbitFORTE 800 km 130 −10 1997

Earth Orbit

Attenuation of the nominal RFI signal canoriginate from the Lunar ionosphere, rocks andmountains on the moon and of course the moonitself. Recently Burns et al. (2012) suggestedthat attenuation in the order of 80 or 90 dB isexpected to be required for detecting the 21-cm above the RFI signal, and that such strongattenuation can only be achieved at some far-side locations. Takahashi (2003) has alreadyshown that the Malapert Mountain area is apromising area for low frequency radio astron-omy as attenuation up to 40 − 60 dB can bereach for certain locations. In that work, Taka-hashi (2003) also simulate the diffraction of theRFI signal and use a simple sinusoidal topologyto show how radio waves at 0.5 and 1.0 MHz arediffracted around Malapert Mountain. From

12

these simulations it is clear that the resultingattenuation depends strongly on the locationbut that locations can be found that are as-sociated with attenuation ranging from ∼ 20to ∼ 40 dB.Note that the results from Taka-hashi (2003) do not cover the large frequencyrange covered by the LRX and moreover, areoutside the frequency band where the 21 cmline is expected to peak. However, as higherattenuation is expected at larger frequenciesthe RFI level could be further reduced. Ourown preliminary simulations at 10 MHz and 30MHz confirm these results, and moreover in-dicate that a mountain like Malapert absorbsa significant fraction of the incident radiationcausing ”RFI-shadow” area’s behind a moun-tain like Malapert.

Concluding, we tentatively find that the Lu-nar South Pole offers locations with significantshielding of the RFI noise component. How-ever, given the fact that the exact ELL landingsite still has to be selected, the uncertainty inthe nominal RFI level, the strong dependenceof the attenuation on the local ionospheric andgeophysical conditions and the influence of thediffraction of the RFI signal, we urge for theneed of more detailed (2D and 3D) simulations.Ultimately in-situ measurements at the LunarSouth Pole will be required to accurately de-termine the RFI level, the radio backgroundspectrum and local attenuation which will pavethe way for detailed study of the early universethrough the 21 cm line emission.

4.4. Planetary Science

The strong magnetic field of the Earth andof the 4 solar system giant planets carves acavity in the solar wind, the magnetosphere,where electrons are accelerated to keV-MeV en-ergies by various processes, and give birth tointense non-thermal low frequency radio emis-sions near/above the magnetic poles (so-calledauroral regions). The radio emission is pro-duced at the local electron cyclotron frequencyfce = (eB)/(2πme) with B the magnetic fieldintensity at the source, or fce(MHz) = 2.8 B

(Gauss), by a resonant mechanism that allowselectrons with keV energy to transfer a largeamount of their energy (up to a few %) to elec-tromagnetic (radio) waves. This mechanism,called the Cyclotron Maser instability (CMI)is by far the most efficient low frequency radiogeneration mechanism, and it operates at allthe radio planets in our solar system (Zarka,1998).

Figure 1 of [Zarka, 1998] displays normalizedaverage spectra of all solar system radio plan-ets (an update on Jupiter is in (Zarka et al.,2004)). Spectral flux densities at Moon surfaceare discussed in more details in Zarka et al.[this issue]. Average values reach a few ×105 Jyfor Jupiter, ∼ 2×104 Jy for Saturn, and about102 Jy for Uranus and Neptune. Peak spec-tra are about one order of magnitude higher.Due to its intense magnetic field (up to 14 Gat the surface), Jupiter’s emission reaches 40MHz, while that from other planets lies below1.5 MHz. All emissions are broadband, becausetheir sources stretch along high-latitude mag-netic field lines from the planetary surface tofar above it, and they are detected with a com-plex morphology in the time-frequency planebecause each magnetosphere may contain sev-eral sources of accelerated electrons (e.g. au-roral or induced by the Io-magnetosphere in-teraction at Jupiter) and because the emis-sion beaming due to CMI is very anisotropic,peaking at large angle from the local mag-netic field. The typical dynamic spectrum ofJupiter’s magnetospheric radio components be-low 16 MHz, shown in Figure 6a of Zarka et al.(2004), illustrates this complex morphology.

Jupiter’s radio emissions are intense, circu-larly or elliptically polarized (depending ontheir magnetic hemisphere of origin), and in-stantaneously point-like at a given frequency.The activity is quasi-permanent in the hecto-kilometer range, and reasonably predictable atdecameter wavelengths (Genova et al., 1989).The full Jovian radio spectrum will be de-tectable by the LRX experiment with integra-

13

tions of order of ∼ 1 sec × 10 kHz. It willprovide a good probe of the Lunar ionosphere,as well as a good calibrator for the receivedflux by comparison with simultaneous ground-based observations above ∼ 10 MHz. Sat-urn’s radio emissions should be detectable withslightly broader integrations (a few sec × a few10’s kHz) and Uranus and Neptune might bedetectable with ∼ 100’s sec ×500 kHz integra-tions [Zarka et al., this issue], provided thatthe antenna’s preamplifier current noise is lowenough.

For all these giant planets, regular observa-tions from a quasi-fixed vantage point shouldallow to study the time variability of the ra-dio emissions, from short pulses to planetaryrotation period, modulations satellites and bythe solar wind, and up to seasonal and solarcycle effects. In particular, accurate determi-nation of the planetary rotation periods has be-come a subject of extremely high interest withthe discovery of the still unexplained dual andvariable radio period of Saturn (Lamy, 2011).Modulations of radio emissions due to naturalsatellites and to the solar wind strength willallow to address magnetospheric dynamics, so-lar wind-magnetosphere coupling (substorms),electrodynamic coupling of the magnetospherewith embedded moons. They will also permitto monitor the solar wind from 1 to 30 AU(with the magnetospheric radio emission inten-sity as a proxy). At Jupiter, polarization of thedecameter emission provides a way to probe theIo plasma torus via Faraday rotation measure-ments. If Uranus and/or Neptune’s radio emis-sions are detected, it will be for the first timesince the Voyager 2 mission in the late 1980’s.LRX will thus offer a unique opportunity indecades to further study the very peculiar dy-namics of their magnetospheres of origin, withtilted rotation and magnetic axes, leading tohelicoidal plasma dynamics at Uranus (Arridgeet al., 2011) and periodic pole-on magneto-spheric configuration at Neptune (Christopheet al., 2011).

Sporadic radio emissions associated to atmo-spheric lightning discharges have been detectedfrom Saturn and Uranus by the Voyager andCassini spacecraft. Typical burst durations are∼ 30−500 msec but their long-term occurrenceis very variable (Zarka et al., 2008). With 3dipoles, only the strongest flashes from Saturnwill be detectable [Zarka et al., this issue], pro-longating the monitoring that Cassini will per-form until the end of the mission in 2017, whichpermits to address questions such as meteo-rology and seasonal variations (related to at-mospheric dynamics), and Saturn’s ionosphericdensity (via low-frequency cutoff of lightningradio signals). With only a few dipoles, exo-planetary magnetospheric radio emissions arebeyond reach (Zarka, 2007, Zarka et al., thisissue), but LRX measurements will set the con-text for future exoplanet low frequency radiosearches with a lunar array.

Even with modest signal-to-noise ratio, cor-relation of the signals receives by the 3 orthog-onal dipoles on LRX will allow to determinethe wave vector and full polarization of incom-ing radio waves (Cecconi, 2010). Whenever asingle source dominates a instantaneous mea-surement (this should be often the case be-cause planetary radio emissions are sporadic)its direction will be determined with a few de-grees accuracy. This will allow us to distinguishplanetary radio emissions from each other.

LRX planetary observations will comple-ment higher frequency (≥ 10 − 30 MHz)ground-based observations with large ground-based instruments such as LOFAR, UTR2(Kharkov), or the Nancay decameter ar-ray (Grießmeier et al., 2011), and providecontext for in-situ spacecraft measurements.Cross-calibration of intensity and polarization,stereoscopic observations, follow-up high sen-sitivity targeted observations, and even verylong baseline interferometric correlations areall to be considered. Radio observations willalso be complemented by observations at otherwavelengths (e.g. with UV images from Hub-

14

ble Space Telescope (Lamy et al., 2012) or itssuccessor).

4.5. Solar Physics

The Sun, our closest star, fundamentally af-fects the Earth’s ecospace and our daily life.Our Sun is a very strong radio source: Super-imposed on the thermal emissions of the quietsun are the intense radio bursts that are as-sociated with solar flares and CME’s, cloudsof ionized plasma ejected into interplanetaryspace. Three main types of radio bursts are ob-served from the Sun, particularly in its activestate, both relate to flares and CME’s. Type IIbursts have a frequency drift with time at ratesconsistent with the speed of the shock throughthe solar corona and interplanetary medium(∼ 1000 − 2000 km/s). Type III bursts areemitted by mildly relativistic (∼ 0.1 − 0.3 c)electron beams propagating through the coronaand interplanetary space that excite plasmawaves at the local plasma frequency. Their fre-quency drift rate is much higher than that ofType II bursts. Type IV bursts are emittedby energetic electrons in the coronal magneticfield structure (such as coronal loops). Boththe Type II and III bursts can be imaged by asingle tripole on the Lunar South Pole in the< 1 to 30 MHz range (but see also the ROLSSconcept for a radio antenna on the lunar nearside Lazio et al., 2011).

The density model of the heliosphere (Mannet al., 1999) directly relates the radio sourcelocation (in solar radii) to the emission fre-quency: higher frequency radio emission orig-inates closer to the surface of the sun, whilelower frequency emission originates furtherout. Dynamic radio spectrograms and coro-nal height-time diagrams thus provide de-tailed information of the movement of plasmathrough the solar corona and out into inter-planetary space. Through the magnetospheric-ionospheric coupling such events have a directinfluence on the lunar ionosphere. However,the physical mechanisms that govern them arenot fully understood. By providing dynamic

spectra and detailed imaging of the solar ra-dio emissions, one will be able to monitorand model the plasma instabilities in the so-lar corona and wave-particle interactions in theactivity centers of the Sun.

A low frequency radio antenna on the southpole of the Moon offers great opportunities forradio studies of the solar wind and the helio-sphere and allows for observations much fur-ther out from the solar surface than possiblefrom the ground, where the ionosphere confinesthe field of view to within a few solar radii. Onewould potentially dynamically image the evo-lution of CME structures (or radio bursts andflares) as they propagate out into interplane-tary space and potentially impact the creationof dust on the Moon or alter the conditions ofthe lunar ionosphere. Observing at frequenciesdown to 0.1 MHz one can potentially followand image CME’s out to 2 AU, particularly ifthey are on a collision course with the telescopeitself. The combined in-situ and remote solarobservations will allow us to track in detail theeffect of solar activity on the lunar environmentdirectly. A south pole location would allow forobserving the effects related to a single CME,flare or radio burst, of the solar wind on the cre-ation of ions in both the dark and sunlit side ofthe Moon, as well as the long-term effects onthe plasma on the dark side.

In addition, a single radio antenna on theMoon will also provide an ideal low-noise facil-ity for Interstellar Plasma Scintillation (IPS)observations in its own right, with the ad-ditional virtue of providing heliospheric cali-bration for all-sky astronomical measurements.Even if confusion limited and with limited in-stantaneous imaging ability, low frequency lu-nar radio experiments conducted simultane-ously with terrestrial LOFAR observations willprovide a series of proof-of-concept low- fre-quency scintillation observations in prepara-tion for the design of more extensive futurearrays. Complementary terrestrial LOFAR ob-servations will provide the heliospheric context

15

Figure 6: The LRX on the Lunar Lander.

for lower frequency imaging with a lunar basedantenna.

5. Preliminary LRX design concept

A number of different antenna configura-tions for the LRX have been studied, butbased on arguments related to the performance(i.e. resulting beam pattern, radiation effi-ciency, polarization, SNR and DOA capabil-ities in the frequency range of interest) andthe deployment a design was selected with anactive tripole antenna consisting of 3 individ-ual dipoles, each 2.5 m in length. The tripoleshall be mounted on a boom so that its armsare symmetrically aligned in the xyz directions.Due to the symmetry, the radiation patternwould be omnidirectional and the algorithm fordirection of arrival signals requires less mem-ory. The choice of orientation depends on theresulting beam pattern, the interaction withthe lander and deployment mechanisms andshall be studied in more detail. However, tomake a symmetrical configuration, the anglebetween each dipole and the horizontal planecould be 35.3◦. Note that the boom for mount-ing the antenna can be conductive and simi-lar (in size and material) to the one used formounting the Langmuir probes (which are alsopart of the L-DEPP package). In Fig. 6 weshow the tripole antenna mounted on a boomwhich is mounted on the upper deck of the Lu-nar Lander.

The antennas will be made out of Beryl-lium alloys, which have good strength andconductivity. The current choice is be-tween Aluminum-Beryllium (AlBeMet), whichis light, and Copper-Beryllium, which has goodstrength and has been already used for spacemissions (e.g. Ulysses Radio/Plasma anten-nas). With the thickness of 0.1 mm for a U-shape tape the latter is the preferred option,in which case the mass of each arm (1.25 m)would be around 20 grams. Deployment forthe tripole antenna can be such that each armof the tripole (in total 6 arms) is placed in atape housing with dimensions of about 3×3×2cm. Each housing will be fitted with a thermalknife-type releasing mechanism. The housingis proposed to be made of Ultem 1000, a light,non-conductive material with enough strength.The mass of each antenna tape with its hous-ing and LNA is less than 50 grams. Prototypesof such a tape-measure deployment mechanismhave been developed at the Radboud Univer-sity Nijmegen, and will be developed in moredetail. Another option for deployment for thetripole antenna is to simply fold the individualarms in the direction of the boom during flightand unfold them once on the surface. Both op-tions will be studied in more detail.

The LRX tripole antenna will have its ownLNA’s, filter and amplifier in the tripole center.The onboard digital processing process is thenperformed by a dedicated PSD board: first anADC digitizes data, then this digital data goesto the DPU which includes an FPGA moduleand a microprocessor for triggering, processingand analysis. The data acquisition system isrequired to be able to make the following pro-cessing steps:

• Fast Fourier transform of the wave form toobtain spectra

• Integration and inspection of spectra

• Buffering of wave forms for offline-processing and pulse localization

• Detecting and triggering on radio burst

16

Figure 7: The frequencies bands defined for the L-DEPP radio and Langmuir Probe instruments. Thereare three bands defined, Low, Mid and High Frequency;the LRX will only operate in the Mid and High Fre-quency bands. The vertical dark grey bands indicate(from the top down) the type of instrument that op-erates in the corresponding frequency range, the typeof measurements that can be performed and finally thefrequency range is shown at the bottom.

Current design requirements are for a 3-channel system with up to 200 MHz samplingrate. These requirements appear feasible, butfurther study is likely to be required. The lowand high frequency regime will be processedseparately due to the additional noise patternspresent at frequencies below 1 MHz. The fol-lowing bands are suggested:

• Mid Frequency or MF band: 100 kHz−3MHz

• High Frequency or HF band: 3 MHz−100MHz

The main advantage of this approach is that itis not required to process the whole broad fre-quency band in one go, which would introduceadditional noise. The choice of frequencies ismade such that there it matches up with thefrequencies for the Langmuir Proves that arealso part of the L-DEPP package, see Fig.7 foran overview.

Finally, in Table 2 we summarize the techni-cal requirements as they follow from the sciencecases as presented in the previous sections.Thenumbers presented in this table are calculatedtaking into account a nominal mission life timeof one year, the memory storage and datatransfer limitations on the ELL.Depending on

the sensitivity the integration time required todetect radio sources may vary from seconds(e.g. noise background) to the mission life time(e.g. 21 cm Dark Ages signal). Activities areplanned for optimizing and testing both thefront- and the back-end of the LRX, address-ing key issues such as the extreme tempera-ture conditions (ranging from 30 K to 300 K)the electronics (for instance the LNA) are ex-posed to,the required sensitivity and spectralresponse for a single active tripole antenna cov-ering such a broad frequency range, calibra-tion of the antenna taking into account the ef-fects of the ELL and the Lunar surface, imple-mentation of RFI mitigation techniques (e.g.Fridman and Baan, 2001) and the removal offoreground objects (for detailed discussions seeJester and Falcke, 2009, Harker et al., 2009,Chapman et al., 2012, Harker et al., 2012) foroptimizing the receiver performance for detect-ing the weak 21 cm line. Here we will also usethe results from ongoing (data and instrument)calibration and testing of the LOFAR anten-nas.

Table 2: Summary of LRX System Requirements.

Experiment Frequency Temp. FFT Snapshotsrange res. res. per day

Lunar 100 Hz 300 s 1 KHz 100Plasma −50 kHzLunar 5 kHz 300 s 1 KHz 50

Exosphere −3 MHzSolar and 1MHz 600 s 200 KHz 50Planetary −40 MHzScience

Astronomy 10 KHz 1200 s 200 KHz 50and −100 MHz

Cosmology

6. Conclusions

The European Lunar Lander is envisaged toland on the South Pole of the moon in 2019and among a multitude of instruments a lowfrequency, active tripole antenna (LRX) is con-sidered to be part of the payload. The care-fully selected South Pole location not only pro-vides a unique view of both the sun-lit and

17

the dark side of the moon simultaneously, al-lowing for a detailed mapping of the lunarionosphere, but also potentially provides theshielding from the man-made RFI, absence ofionospheric distortions, and high temperatureand antenna gain stability that allows detec-tion of the 21 cm wave emission from pristinehydrogen formed after the big bang and intothe period where the first stars formed. TheLRX antenna opens up the last virtually unex-plored frequency regime below ∼ 30 MHz forradio astronomy, allowing for study of auro-ral radiation in the atmosphere of Jupiter andSaturn, detection of high-energy cosmic rays,and more detailed study of the solar CME todistances closer to earth (space-weather pre-diction). More importantly, the LRX is apathfinder mission and will determine by in-situ measurements the Lunar radio backgroundin unprecedented detail, paving the way for afuture large low-frequency radio array on themoon.

7. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. JanBergman of the Swedish Institute of SpacePhysics, Prof. Ralph Srama of the Universityof Stuttgart and Gerrit Hausmann, Dr. Juer-gen Burfeindt and Hans-Guenter Bernhardtof Kayser-Threde GmbH Germany, Prof. dr.L.V.E. Koopmans of the Kapteyn Astronomi-cal Institute, Prof. O. Scholten of the ”Kern-fysisch Versneller Instituut” and Dr. StijnBuitink and Thomas Bronzwaer of the Rad-boud University Nijmegen for all their usefuldiscussions and contributions. In addition theauthors thank the referees for their useful com-ments and suggestions

References

Alexander, J. K., Kaiser, M. L., Novaco, J. C., Grena,F. R., Weber, R. R., May 1975. Scientific instrumen-tation of the Radio-Astronomy-Explorer-2 satellite.Astronomy and Astrophysics 40, 365–371.

Allan, W., Poulter, E. M., May 1992. ULF waves-theirrelationship to the structure of the Earth’s magneto-sphere. Reports on Progress in Physics 55, 533–598.

Arridge, C. S., Agnor, C. B., Andre, N., Baines, K. H.,Fletcher, L. N., Gautier, D., Hofstadter, M. D.,Jones, G. H., Lamy, L., Langevin, Y., Mousis, O.,Nettelmann, N., Russell, C. T., Stallard, T., Tis-careno, M. S., Tobie, G., Bacon, A., Chaloner,C., Guest, M., Kemble, S., Peacocke, L., Achilleos,N., Andert, T. P., Banfield, D., Barabash, S.,Barthelemy, M., Bertucci, C., Brandt, P., Cecconi,B., Chakrabarti, S., Cheng, A. F., Christensen, U.,Christou, A., Coates, A. J., Collinson, G., Cooper,J. F., Courtin, R., Dougherty, M. K., Ebert, R. W.,Entradas, M., Fazakerley, A. N., Fortney, J. J., Ga-land, M., Gustin, J., Hedman, M., Helled, R., Henri,P., Hess, S., Holme, R., Karatekin, O., Krupp, N.,Leisner, J., Martin-Torres, J., Masters, A., Melin, H.,Miller, S., Muller-Wodarg, I., Noyelles, B., Paran-icas, C., de Pater, I., Patzold, M., Prange, R.,Quemerais, E., Roussos, E., Rymer, A. M., Sanchez-Lavega, A., Saur, J., Sayanagi, K. M., Schenk, P.,Schubert, G., Sergis, N., Sohl, F., Sittler, E. C.,Teanby, N. A., Tellmann, S., Turtle, E. P., Vinatier,S., Wahlund, J.-E., Zarka, P., Sep. 2011. UranusPathfinder: exploring the origins and evolution ofIce Giant planets. Experimental Astronomy, 113.

Bauer, S. J., 1996. Limits to the lunar ionosphere.Anzeiger Abt. II (133), 17–21.

Benson, J., Freeman, J. W., Hills, H. K., Ibrahim, M.,Schneider, H., Mar. 1975. The Lunar Ionosphere. In:Lunar and Planetary Institute Conference Abstracts.Vol. 6 of Lunar and Planetary Institute ConferenceAbstracts. pp. 39–+.

Bougeret, J.-L., Kaiser, M. L., Kellogg, P. J., Manning,R., Goetz, K., Monson, S. J., Monge, N., Friel, L.,Meetre, C. A., Perche, C., Sitruk, L., Hoang, S., Feb.1995. Waves: The Radio and Plasma Wave Investiga-tion on the Wind Spacecraft. Space Science Reviews71, 231–263.

Bowman, J. D., Rogers, A. E. E., Dec. 2010. A lowerlimit of ∆z>0.06 for the duration of the reionizationepoch. Nature 468, 796–798.

Burns, J. O., Lazio, J., Bale, S., Bowman, J., Bradley,R., Carilli, C., Furlanetto, S., Harker, G., Loeb,A., Pritchard, J., Feb. 2012. Probing the first starsand black holes in the early Universe with the DarkAges Radio Explorer (DARE). Advances in SpaceResearch 49, 433–450.

Burns, J. O., Lazio, J., Bowman, J., Bradley, R.,Carilli, C., Furlanetto, S., Harker, G., Loeb, A.,Pritchard, J., Jan. 2011. The Dark Ages Radio Ex-plorer (DARE). In: American Astronomical SocietyMeeting Abstracts #217. Vol. 43 of Bulletin of theAmerican Astronomical Society. p. 107.09.

Burr, T., Jacobson, A., Mielke, A., Dec. 2005. A dy-

18

namic global radio frequency noise survey as ob-served by the FORTE satellite at 800 km altitude.Radio Science 40, 6016.

Cane, H. V., Erickson, W. C., 2001. A 10 MHz map ofthe galaxy. Radio Science 36, 1765–1768.

Cane, H. V., Whitham, P. S., Apr. 1977. Observationsof the southern sky at five frequencies in the range 2-20 MHz. Monthly Notices of the Royal AstronomicalSociety 179, 21–29.

Carilli, C. L., Hewitt, J. N., Loeb, A., Feb. 2007. Lowfrequency radio astronomy from the moon: cosmicreionization and more. In: Livio, M. (Ed.), Proceed-ings of the workshop “Astrophysics Enabled by theReturn to the Moon”. Cambridge University Press,in press [astro-ph/0702070].

Carozzi, T., Karlsson, R., Bergman, J., Feb. 2000. Pa-rameters characterizing electromagnetic wave polar-ization. Physical Review E 61, 2024–2028.

Cecconi, B., 2010. Goniopolarimetric techniques forlow-frequency radio astronomy in space. ISSI Scien-tific Reports Series 9, 263–277.

Chapman, E., Abdalla, F. B., Harker, G., Jelic, V.,Labropoulos, P., Zaroubi, S., Brentjens, M. A., deBruyn, A. G., Koopmans, L. V. E., Jul. 2012.Foreground removal using FASTICA: a showcase ofLOFAR-EoR. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro-nomical Society 423, 2518–2532.

Christophe, B., Spilker, L. J., Anderson, J. D., Andre,N., Asmar, S. W., Aurnou, J., Banfield, D., Barucci,A., Bertolami, O., Bingham, R., Brown, P., Cecconi,B., Courty, J.-M., Dittus, H., Fletcher, L. N., Foulon,B., Francisco, F., Gil, P. J. S., Glassmeier, K.-H.,Grundy, W., Hansen, C., Helbert, J., Helled, R.,Hussmann, H., Lamine, B., Lammerzahl, C., Lamy,L., Lenoir, B., Levy, A., Orton, G., Paramos, J.,Poncy, J., Postberg, F., Progrebenko, S. V., Reh,K. R., Reynaud, S., Robert, C., Samain, E., Saur,J., Sayanagi, K. M., Schmitz, N., Selig, H., Sohl, F.,Spilker, T. R., Srama, R., Stephan, K., Touboul, P.,Wolf, P., Jun. 2011. OSS (Outer Solar System): Afundamental and planetary physics mission to Nep-tune, Triton and the Kuiper Belt. ArXiv e-prints.

Ciardi, B., Ferrara, A., Feb. 2005. The First CosmicStructures and Their Effects. Space Science Reviews116, 625–705, as updated at arXiv:astro-ph/0409018.

Ciardi, B., Salvaterra, R., Nov. 2007. Lyα heating andits impact on early structure formation. Monthly No-tices of the Royal Astronomical Society 381, 1137–1142.

Close, S., Colestock, P., Cox, L., Kelley, M., Lee, N.,Dec. 2010. Electromagnetic pulses generated by me-teoroid impacts on spacecraft. Journal of Geophysi-cal Research (Space Physics) 115 (A14), 12328.

Ellis, G. R. A., Mendillo, M., 1987. A 1.6 MHz surveyof the galactic background radio emission. AustralianJournal of Physics 40, 705–708.

Fridman, P. A., Baan, W. A., Oct. 2001. RFI mitigationmethods in radio astronomy. Astronomy and Astro-physics 378, 327–344.

Furlanetto, S. R., Lidz, A., Loeb, A., McQuinn, M.,Pritchard, J. R., Shapiro, P. R., Alvarez, M. A.,Backer, D. C., Bowman, J. D., Burns, J. O., Carilli,C. L., Cen, R., Cooray, A., Gnedin, N., Greenhill,L. J., Haiman, Z., Hewitt, J. N., Hirata, C. M., Lazio,J., Mesinger, A., Madau, P., Morales, M. F., Oh,S. P., Peterson, J. B., Pihlstrom, Y. M., Tegmark,M., Trac, H., Zahn, O., Zaldarriaga, M., 2009.Cosmology from the Highly-Redshifted 21 cm Line.In: astro2010: The Astronomy and AstrophysicsDecadal Survey. Vol. 2010 of ArXiv Astrophysics e-prints. p. 82.

Furlanetto, S. R., Oh, S. P., Briggs, F. H., Oct. 2006.Cosmology at low frequencies: The 21 cm transitionand the high-redshift Universe. Physics Reports 433,181–301.

Gardini, B., 2011. ESA strategy for human explorationand the Lunar Lander Mission. Memorie della Soci-eta Astronomica Italiana 82, 422.

Genova, F., Zarka, P., Lecacheux, A., 1989. Jupiter De-cametric Radiation. NASA Special Publication 494,156–174.

Goto, Y., Fujimoto, T., Kasahara, Y., Kumamoto, A.,Ono, T., Jan. 2011. Lunar ionosphere explorationmethod using auroral kilometric radiation. Earth,Planets, and Space 63, 47–56.

Grießmeier, P., Zarka, P., Girard, J. N., 2011. Observa-tion of planetary radio emissions using large arrays.RADIO SCIENCE 46, 4752.

Harker, G., Zaroubi, S., Bernardi, G., Brentjens, M. A.,de Bruyn, A. G., Ciardi, B., Jelic, V., Koop-mans, L. V. E., Labropoulos, P., Mellema, G., Of-fringa, A., Pandey, V. N., Schaye, J., Thomas,R. M., Yatawatta, S., Aug. 2009. Non-parametricforeground subtraction for 21-cm epoch of reioniza-tion experiments. Monthly Notices of the Royal As-tronomical Society 397, 1138–1152.

Harker, G. J. A., Pritchard, J. R., Burns, J. O., Bow-man, J. D., Jan. 2012. An MCMC approach to ex-tracting the global 21-cm signal during the cosmicdawn from sky-averaged radio observations. MonthlyNotices of the Royal Astronomical Society 419, 1070–1084.

Imamura, T., Iwata, T., Yamamoto, Z., Oyama, K.-I., Nabatov, A., Kono, Y., Matsumoto, M., Liu,Q., Noda, H., Hanada, H., Futaana, Y., Saito, A.,Mar. 2008. Initial Results of the Lunar IonosphereObservation with SELENE Radio Science. In: Lu-nar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Ab-stracts. Vol. 39 of Lunar and Planetary Institute Sci-ence Conference Abstracts. p. 1659.

Jester, S., Falcke, H., May 2009. Science with a lunarlow-frequency array: From the dark ages of the Uni-

19

verse to nearby exoplanets. New Astronomy Review53, 1–26.

Kaiser, M. L., Desch, M. D., Bougeret, J.-L., Manning,R., Meetre, C. A., 1996. Wind/WAVES observationsof man-made radio transmissions. Geophysical Re-search Letters 23, 1287–1290.

Kassim, N. E., Weiler, K. W. (Eds.), 1990. Low fre-quency astrophysics from space; Proceedings of anInternational Workshop, Crystal City, VA, Jan. 8, 9,1990.

Lamy, L., 2011. Variability of southern and northernperiodicities of Saturn Kilometric Radiation. Plane-tary, Solar and Heliospheric Radio Emissions (PREVII), 38–50.

Lamy, L., Prang, R., Hansen, K. C., Clarke, J. T.,Zarka, P., Cecconi, B. e. a., 2012. Earth-based de-tection of Uranus’ aurorae. Geophysics Research Let-ters, in press.

Lazio, T. J. W., MacDowall, R. J., Burns, J. O., Jones,D. L., Weiler, K. W., Demaio, L., Cohen, A., Par-avastu Dalal, N., Polisensky, E., Stewart, K., Bale,S., Gopalswamy, N., Kaiser, M., Kasper, J., Dec.2011. The Radio Observatory on the Lunar Surfacefor Solar studies. Advances in Space Research 48,1942–1957.

Mann, G., Jansen, F., MacDowall, R. J., Kaiser, M. L.,Stone, R. G., Aug. 1999. A heliospheric densitymodel and type III radio bursts. Astronomy and As-trophysics 348, 614–620.

Novaco, J. C., Brown, L. W., Apr. 1978. Nonthermalgalactic emission below 10 megahertz. AstrophysicalJournal 221, 114–123.

Ogilvie, K. W., Parks, G. K., 1996. First results fromWIND spacecraft: An introduction. Geophysics Re-search Letters 23, 1179–1182.

Pluchino, S., Schilliro, F., Salerno, E., Pupillo, G., Mac-caferri, G., Cassaro, P., 2008. Radio occultation mea-surements of the lunar ionosphere. Memorie della So-cieta Astronomica Italiana Supplementi 12, 53.

Pritchard, J., Loeb, A., Dec. 2010. Cosmology: Hydro-gen was not ionized abruptly. Nature 468, 772–773.

Reasoner, D. L., Burke, W. J., 1972. Direct observa-tion of the lunar photoelectron layer. In: Metzger,A. E., Trombka, J. I., Peterson, L. E., Reedy, R. C.,Arnold, J. R. (Eds.), Lunar and Planetary ScienceConference. Vol. 3 of Lunar and Planetary ScienceConference. pp. 2639–+.

Reasoner, D. L., O’Brien, B. J., 1972. Measurement onthe lunar surface of impact-produced plasma clouds.Journal of Geophysical Research 77, 1292–1299.

Rees, M. J., May 1999. The End of the ‘Dark Age’.In: Holt, S., Smith, E. (Eds.), After the Dark Ages:When Galaxies were Young (the Universe at 2 < z <5). Vol. 470 of American Institute of Physics Confer-ence Series. pp. 13–+.

Scholten, O., Bacelar, J., Braun, R., de Bruyn, A. G.,

Falcke, H., Stappers, B., Strom, R. G., Oct. 2006.Optimal radio window for the detection of Ultra-HighEnergy cosmic rays and neutrinos off the moon. As-troparticle Physics 26, 219–229.

Stal, O., Bergman, J. E. S., Thide, B., Daldorff,L. K. S., Ingelman, G., Feb. 2007. Prospects for Lu-nar Satellite Detection of Radio Pulses from Ultra-high Energy Neutrinos Interacting with the Moon.Physical Review Letters 98 (7), 071103.

Stubbs, T. J., Vondrak, R. R., Farrell, W. M., Jan.2007. Impact of Dust on Lunar Exploration. Dust inPlanetary Systems 643, 239–243.

Takahashi, Y. D., Jun. 2003. A concept for a simpleradio observatory at the lunar south pole. Advancesin Space Research 31, 2473–2478.

Vyshlov, A. S., 1976. Preliminary results of circumlunarplasma research by the Luna 22 spacecraft, 945–949.

Weiler, K. W. (Ed.), 1987. Radio astronomy from space;Proceedings of the Workshop, Green Bank, WV,Sept. 30-Oct. 2, 1986.

Weiler, K. W., Johnston, K. J., Simon, R. S., Dennison,B. K., Erickson, W. C., Kaiser, M. L., Cane, H. V.,Desch, M. D., Apr. 1988. A low frequency radio arrayfor space. Astronomy and Astrophysics 195, 372–379.

Well, H., Barasch, M. L., Jun. 1962. Model of the LunarIonosphere. Astronomical Journal 67, 589.

Zarka, P., Sep. 1998. Auroral radio emissions at theouter planets: Observations and theories. Journal ofGeophysical Research 103, 20159–20194.

Zarka, P., Apr. 2007. Plasma interactions of exoplanetswith their parent star and associated radio emissions.Planetary Space Science 55, 598–617.

Zarka, P., Cecconi, B., Kurth, W. S., Aug.2004. Jupiter’s low-frequency radio spectrum fromCassini/Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS)absolute flux density measurements. Journal of Geo-physical Research (Space Physics) 109 (A18), 9.

Zarka, P., Farrell, W., Fischer, G., Konovalenko, A.,Jun. 2008. Ground-Based and Space-Based RadioObservations of Planetary Lightning. Space ScienceReviews 137, 257–269.

20