free-riding and intergroup moblitily jun kobayashi (chicago) hideki fujiyama (dokkyo) yuhsuke koyama...

22
FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004 ASA, San Francisco

Upload: noreen-douglas

Post on 18-Jan-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

FREE-RIDING and

INTERGROUP MOBLITILY

Jun Kobayashi (Chicago)Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo)Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech)Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo)

August 16, 2004ASA, San Francisco

Page 2: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

OVERVIEW

Free-riding and Mobility?

Experiment w/ Exit Option

Macro Dynamics and Micro Behavior

Page 3: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

3

Modern Societies... MOBILITY Turnover, Divorce, Moving, Immigration

Globalization, Internet

QUESTION

Effects of MOBILITY on FREE-RIDING???

Page 4: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

4

RATIONAL to FREE-RIDEbut EFFICIENT to COOPERATE

(Externality)

Promise, DonationTeamwork, Social Movement

FREE-RIDER PROBLEM

Page 5: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

ON the RUN (Erhart-Keser) Experiment, 9 in initial 3 groups Cooperators “ESCAPE”

(Group) CirculationCooperation↑ -> Size↑ -> C↓-> S↓

(Individual) Avoid Free-ridersCooperator↑ -> Leave S↑, Enter S↓

Various Conditions???

Page 6: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

Introduction

Data

Result

Page 7: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

7

2003/4, 4 universities in Japan 14 Sessions, 234 students 1289.0 yens ($11), 90 minutes Computer-based, Group data

NO Mobility LOW/ HIGH/ COMPLETE Mobility

16-7 in 4 Groups, Anonymous 50 Rounds, 9 Pauses/Exit chances

EXPERIMENT

Page 8: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

8

Page 9: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

9

GAMEA B C D

Pause/Exit

Free-rider Problem

 

Page 10: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

10

Resource 20 yensPROVIDE or NOT

Pooled Resources...DOUBLED...3/more-player groupsx 1.5... 2-player GroupsSAME... 1-player Groups

EQUALLY Distributed in Group

1. FREE-RIDER PROBLEM

Page 11: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

11

Provide = 40m / 4 (Providers) Not = 40(m-1) / 4 + 20

NotProvide

NotNot

x 2 =

EXAMPLE (4 PLAYERS)

Page 12: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

12

NO Mobility... PAUSE

LOW Mobility... 50 yens to Exit

HIGH Mobility... 20 yens

Complete Mobility... 0 yen

2. PAUSE or EXIT

Page 13: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

A  33.3

3

B  25.0

0

C  27.5

0

D  25.0

0

A  33.3

3

B  25.0

0

C  27.5

0

D  25.0

0

A 

3

B 4

C 8

D 

2

Groups’ Average PayoffsLast Round

Groups’ Average Payoffsin This Block

Groups’ Size

Group C Block 2 Round 2Your Decisions and Payoffs in This Block

Round Your Decision Your Payoff

1 NOT 35.00

2 PROVIDE   5.00

Your Total: 125 yens(20 yens subtracted for Moving)

Group C's Members: You (ID 6) and Other 7

What do you do this round?

PROVIDE 20 yens

NOT

Page 14: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

Provided 20 yens: 3 persons

Not: 4 persons

Your Decision: Provide

Your Payoff: 17.14 yens

Page 15: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

Groups’ Average PayoffsLast Block, Size

BLOCK END

Groups’ Average Payoffs

Group Round 1 2 3 4 5

A   33.33  20.0

0  15.5

5  24.7

635.00

B   25.00  35.0

0  19.1

0  35.0

035.00

C   27.50  27.5

0  22.0

0  27.5

020.00

D   25.00  35.0

0  25.0

0  25.0

018.88Your payoff Last Block: 112 yens in Group C

Click to Next

A  30.0

03

B  33.3

34

C  25.0

08

D  27.5

02

Page 16: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

A  30.0

03

B  33.3

34

C  25.0

08

D  27.5

02

Groups’ Average PayoffsLast Block, Size

BLOCK END

Groups’ Average Payoffs

Group Round 1 2 3 4 5

A   33.33  20.0

0  15.5

5  24.7

635.00

B   25.00  35.0

0  19.1

0  35.0

035.00

C   27.50  27.5

0  22.0

0  27.5

020.00

D   25.00  35.0

0  25.0

0  25.0

018.88Your payoff Last Block: 112 yens in Group C

Which Group in Next Block? Move with 50 yens

Group A

B

C

D

Page 17: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

Introduction

Data

Result

Page 18: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

18

Cooperation DECREASES

RoundsCoo

pera

tion

0.20

0.25

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

0.50

0.55

0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80

Mobility

Page 19: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

y = GROUP SIZE

N=360 (Groups in Blocks)

Group Cooperation↑ -> Size↑

Model 1 2BLOCK (1-10) .001 .002PREVIOUS SIZE -.602***PREVIOUS C .163** .356***Adjusted R2 .021 .347

Page 20: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

y = GROUP COOPERATION

Group Size↑ -> Cooperation↓

Model 1 2BLOCK -.059 -.061PREVIOUS C .232***PREVIOUS SIZE -.143*CURRENT SIZE -.377*** -.269***Adjusted R2 .164 .127

Page 21: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

LEAVE and ENTERCorrelations with COOPERATION

N=505 (Individual Mobility)

Cooperators Leave LARGE Groups Enter SMALL Groups

(to Avoid Free-riders)

Group Size rPREVIOUS Size, Left .041PREVIOUS Size, Entered -.141**

Page 22: FREE-RIDING and INTERGROUP MOBLITILY Jun Kobayashi (Chicago) Hideki Fujiyama (Dokkyo) Yuhsuke Koyama (Tokyo Tech) Hirokuni Ooura (Teikyo) August 16, 2004

22

Mobility DECREASES Cooperation

Cooperative Groups EXPAND, then DECREASE Cooperation Cooperators Enter SMALL Groups

Differences b/w CONDITIONS? Role of SANCTION?

SUMMARY