fracture toughness & fatigue week 3. behaviour of materials in service a material or structure...

53
Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3

Upload: bridget-dickerson

Post on 25-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fracture Toughness & Fatigue

Week 3

Page 2: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Behaviour of Materials in Service

A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the original design function.

Failure may be due to:• Plastic buckling.• Dimensional change with time.• Loss of material through corrosion, erosion or

abrasion. • Fracture - partial or complete.

Page 3: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Failure by Yielding

Metals exhibit both elastic and plastic behaviour.

As the level of stress is increased so the amount of elastic strain increases in direct proportion to the stress applied up to a certain limit – elastic limit.

To minimise the possibility of excessive stress factors of safety are applied.

Page 4: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Failure by Fracture

The terms, tough, ductile, brittle, or fatigue are frequently used to describe the fracture behaviour of a material.

Tough or ductile fracture – failure is preceded by excessive plastic deformation often detectable.

Brittle or non-ductile fracture - involves little or no plastic deformation – often Catastrophic.

Page 5: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fracture Type

The type of fracture which occurs is largely dependant upon the type and condition of the material.

Other factors include:– the type of stress applied.– the rate of stress application.– temperature and environmental conditions.– component geometry.– size and nature of internal flaws.

Page 6: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fracture Mechanics This is the study of the relationships

between crack geometry, material strength and toughness and stress systems as they affect the fracture characteristics of a material.

The aim of fracture mechanics is to determine the critical size of a defect necessary for fast fracture to occur.

That is catastrophic crack propagation and failure under service loading.

Page 7: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fracture Toughness

To improve fracture toughness there is a need to avoid excessive elastic deflections & plastic yielding.

Fast fracture can occur which causes catastrophic failure.

E.g. Welding of ships, oil rigs, bridges, pipelines, pressure vessels.

Page 8: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fast Fracture

All related to cracks, flaws or defects. Fast fracture caused by growth of these

defects which suddenly become unstable & propagate at the speed of sound.

Page 9: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Why Does This Happen?

There appears to be a critical pressure (stress) related to the size of the internal flaw.

There is therefore a need to determine the critical stress.

Page 10: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Sample with Flaw

a a

Thickness, t

F

F

If the flaw is increased by δa , then:

Work done by loads ≥ Change in elastic energy + energy absorbed at the flaw tip.

i.e.

aGUW cel t

Fig. 1

Page 11: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Definitions

2-

2-6

c

2-c

c

c

10Jm - Glass

Jm10 -Copper

flaw thepropergate toisit harder theGhigher The

Jm - G of Units

RATE RELEASE ENERGY STRAIN CRITICALor

TOUGHNESS called flaw of areaunit makingin absorbedEnergy

:property almathematic a is G

areacrack at

crack of areaunit per absorbedEnergy G

Page 12: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fast Fracture at Fixed Displacements Consider a plate clamped at both ends

under tension as in fig.1

atGU-

0W

cel

Page 13: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Increase in Load

a

a

E

Consider a small cube of material of unit volume due to load (F)

Page 14: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

)2/a)(2/( Uis changeEnergy

energy its all lose &

zero) to tends(relax willarea dotted in theregion The

a'' flaw a Introduce

Eor 1/2 U

energystrain a has thereforecubeunit Each

)(strain & )( stress tosubjected isEach

2el

el

tE

Page 15: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

fracturefast at EGaor a/EG

2 offactor aby low toois U of valuetherelaxes, material

hein which t way theregarding sassumption of Because

a/2EG

:givescondition critical The

a/2)aE)(22/(U

a/dadUU

:alengthby spreadscrack theAs

cc

el

c

2el

elel

t

Page 16: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fast Fracture at Fixed Loads

F

F

Load acts in a more complex way. As the flaw grows material becomes less stiff & relaxes. The applied forces move & do work. W is therefore finite & positive.

Uel is now positive & the final result for fast fracture is found to be the same (some of W goes to increase the strain energy).

Page 17: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

c

c

c

G & Eon dependsonly

&property material a be toappears fractureFast

reached is stress

of valuecritical'' some when a''crack a Subject to 2.

a'' size critical a reachescrack a stress a Subject to 1.

:reasons for twooccur can fracturefast Implies

EGa

fracturefast for Condition

EGa Therefore,

:side handRight

:side handLeft

Page 18: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Stress Intensity Factor

cc

c

EGK

KK

: toughnessfracture the torelates &

FACTOR INTENSITY STRESS the

called K'' termsingle a toreducedusually is πaσ termThe

Page 19: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Toughness & fracture toughness values for some metals

Material Toughness

Gc

(kJ m-2)

Fracture toughness

Kc

(MPa m½ or MNm-3/2)

Steels 30 – 150 80 – 170

Cast Irons 0.2 - 3 6 - 20

Aluminium alloys

0.4 - 70 5 - 70

Page 20: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont.

No material is free from defects, so it is essential that any crack-like defects are relatively harmless.

Using values of fracture toughness it is possible to calculate the size of defect or magnitude of stress required to cause failure.

Page 21: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont.

σy

Applie

d s

tress

Defect size

Failure by

yielding

Failure by

Fast fracture

Critical size

Page 22: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Correction Factors

applied are factors correctionother a, tdimensionsother For

a t , where

a1.12K Therefore,

a dimensionsother & tpracticeIn

dimensions plateother a ti.e.

materials finite-semifor thin only true isresult heStrictly t

Page 23: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Sellotape

MM

t

a

a

Increase the load to the value M that just causes rapid peeling. For this geometry, the quantity Uel is small compared to the work done by M & can be neglected (tape has comparatively little ‘give’).

Page 24: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

2-c

2-c

2

c

c

c

490.5JmG

10 x 9.81/2 x 1G

9.81m/sg

1kgM

2cmt

:Example

Mg/tG

atGaMg

atGW

Page 25: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Example

495MPastrength Yield

24.2MNm K

strength. yield at the

fail crack to of size thedetermine Also 0.2mm. of a'' size

crack a containsit if T651-7074alloy aluminiuman for (MPa)

stress fracture thedetermine a,kequation theUsing

3/2-c

c

Page 26: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Solution

fracturefast under fail always willmaterial the0.76mma if I.E.

0.76mmm7.61x10a

/)495/2.24(a

/)/K(a

)/K(a

/Ka Now,

MPa4.965)0.2x10 x (24.2/a/K

aK

4-

2

2fc

2fc

fc

3-cf

fc

Page 27: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Tutorial Exercise 1

Determine the fracture strength for a high strength steel assuming a crack of 0.2mm & kc=55MNm-3/2. Also if the yield strength is 1550 MPa determine the size of crack that will cause failure at this stress.

Page 28: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Solution

mm4.0m4x10a

/)1550/55(a

/)/K(a

)/K(a

/Ka Now,

MPa2.2194

)0.2x10x (/55

a/K

4-

2

2fc

2fc

fc

f

3-f

cf

Page 29: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Ceramics

The strength of ceramics varies considerably from 0.69MPa to about 7x103MPa.

As a class of materials, few have tensile strengths above 172MPa.

There are also large differences in compressive strength, usually between 5 & 10 times higher than the tensile strength.

Many ceramics are hard & have low impact resistance – reflecting their ionic/covalent bonding.

Page 30: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Deformation Mechanisms

Generally lack of plasticity in crystalline ceramics due to bonding.

Bonding directional, dislocations are narrow & do not move easily.

Deformation is mainly due to ionic bond, but this is brittle.

Cracks form at grain boundaries.

Page 31: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Factors Affecting Strength

Mainly occur from structural defects:

Surface cracks.

Voids (porosity).

Inclusions.

Large grains. These are produced during processing.

Page 32: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Once a crack forms - no energy absorbing processes – crack propagates until fracture – general decrease in strength.

Size & volume fraction important. Flaw size can be related to grain size –

finer grain size ceramics have smaller size flaws at their grain boundaries.

Page 33: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Strength is determined by chemical composition, microstructure, surface condition.

Additionally – temperature, environment & type of stress & how it is applied.

Page 34: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Ceramic Abrasive Materials

High hardness makes them useful for grinding, cutting & polishing other lower hardness materials.

Fused alumina & silicon carbide are two commonly used ceramic abrasives.

Products – sheet & wheels manufactured by bonding individual ceramic particles together

Bonding materials include fired ceramics, organic resins & rubbers.

Page 35: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Ceramic particles must be hard with sharp cutting edges.

Must have a certain amount of porosity to provide channels for air or liquid to flow through – act to cool the abrasive & removes debris.

Aluminium oxide grains tougher than silicon carbide ones, but not as hard.

Page 36: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

By combining with zirconium oxide improved abrasives have been developed.

Another important ceramic abrasive is cubic boron nitride – borazon- almost as hard as diamond, but better heat stability.

Page 37: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fracture Toughness of Ceramics

Due to their combination of covalent & ionic bonding, ceramics have inherently low toughness.

Toughness can be improved by processes such as hot pressing with additives & reaction bonding.

Page 38: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Tutorial Exercise 2

The maximum sized internal flaw in a hot-pressed silicon carbide ceramic is 30micron. If this material has a fracture toughness of 3.9MNm-3/2, what is the maximum stress that this material can support?

Page 39: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Solution

MPa1.568

)15x10x (/9.3

a/K

m15x10 /230x10a

2by divided bemust crack theof size the

internal, iscrack thefact that the toDue

f

6-f

cf

6-6-

Page 40: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Fatigue

Effect of Mean Stress – Goodman & Soderberg

Page 41: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Introduction

It been estimated that 75-80% of all failures in engineering components, machines, vehicles, structures & bridges, aircraft, ships,etc..are due to fatigue.

Fatigue is the general failure which occurs after several cycles of loading to a stress level below the ultimate tensile stress & is generally due to localised plastic deformation at the metal surface, culminating in the nucleation of sharp discontinuities, which once formed continue to grow into cracks.

Page 42: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Pre-existing cracks, imperfections & defects, small cracks usually at the surface, weld defects, machining marks, & scratches act as stress concentrators & the failure is characterised as a smooth portion of surface with a ‘clamshell’ or ‘beachmark’ appearance, with a concentric series of lines recording each cyclic advance of the fracture.

Page 43: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

This abruptly changes to a granular portion which corresponds to the rapid crack propagation at the point of catastrophic failure.

Fig. 1 shows the conditions for fatigue loading.

Page 44: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Fig. 1 The conditions for fatigue loading.

-

S

TR

ES

S

+

ALTERNATING LOAD

TIME

STRESS RANGE

MEAN STRESS

-

ST

RE

SS

+

PULSATED OR REPEATED LOAD

TIME

MEAN STRESS

STRESS RANGE

-

S

TR

ES

S

+

FLUCTUATING LOAD

TIME

MEAN STRESSSTRESS RANGE

Page 45: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Conditions

Fluctuating load - the mean stress is greater than the stress range.

Pulsating or repeating load – the mean stress is equal to half the stress range.

Alternating load – the mean stress is zero.

Page 46: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

S/N Diagrams

Typical S/N diagrams for pieces subject to alternating loads are shown in fig. 2.

Goodman & Soderberg investigated the relationship between stress amplitude, mean stress & fatigue.

Goodman & Soderberg diagrams are shown in fig.3.

Page 47: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

S/N Diagrams

Fig. 2 Typical S/N diagrams for pieces subject to alternating loads

Str

ess

am

plit

ud

e (S

)

Failure occurs for stress values above this line

ENDURANCE LIMIT FOR 'N' REVERSALS

Typical S - N diagram for non ferrous alloy

Number of stress cycles (N)

FATIGUE LIMIT

Str

ess

am

plit

ud

e (S

)

Failure occurs for stress values above this line

Typical S - N diagram for steel

Number of stress cycles (N)

Page 48: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

S/N Diagrams Fig. 3 Goodman & Soderberg investigated

the relationship between stress amplitude, mean stress & fatigue.

Str

ess

am

plit

ude

(S

)

Typical S - N diagram for non ferrous alloy

MEAN STRESS

Str

ess

am

plit

ude

(S

)

Typical S - N diagram for steel

MEAN STRESS

Yieldstress

Tensilestrength

Material stressed withinthis area should notfail by fatigue

Material stressed withinthis area should notfail by fatigue

Fatigue limit(mean stress = 0)

Fatigue limit(mean stress = 0)

Page 49: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Perfect Alternation

When the mean stress is zero (perfect alternation), the fatigue limit is at a maximum value before failure occurs.

If a steady state of stress is superimposed on the cyclical stress then this must also be taken into account – this steady state stress is the mean stress.

Page 50: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Goodman Diagram

In the Goodman diagram the fatigue limit is zero when the mean stress is equal to the tensile strength of the material, since the material will fail at this value before any cyclical loading can commence.

Page 51: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Cont’d

Therefore, if the point representing the stress amplitude & the mean stress for any given set of conditions lies within the area bounded by the axes & the ‘Goodman Line’( the shaded area), then according to the Goodman relationship the material should not fail by fatigue.

Page 52: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Soderberg Diagram

In the Soderberg diagram the fatigue limit is zero when the mean stress is equal to the yield stress of the material. Again, the point representing the stress amplitude & the mean stress for the material must lie within the shaded area bounded by the axes & the ‘Soderberg Line’, if failure by fatigue is to be avoided.

Page 53: Fracture Toughness & Fatigue Week 3. Behaviour of Materials in Service A material or structure is deemed to have failed when it is unable to satisfy the

Note

Since perfect alternation (zero mean stress) rarely occurs in practice, S/N curves should not be used alone without consideration of the mean stress.

Care must also be taken in using even the Goodman & Soderberg diagrams since they tend to give a low value of the fatigue limit for ductile materials & high value of fatigue limit for brittle materials.