fourth joint eu-oecd workshop on business and consumer opinion surveys eu-wide business survey in...
TRANSCRIPT
Fourth Joint EU-OECD Workshop on Business and Consumer Opinion Surveys
EU-wide business survey in the financial service sector
Brussels, 12th October 2009
Extension of business surveys to the financial service sector • Importance of financial services sector for the development of the
overall economy
• EU-wide monthly survey among managers
• 10 European countries covered
Main Objectives
• Provide useful information enabling to evaluate the development of
the value-added and expectations of operators
• Pilot phase: period of evaluation, between April 2006 and March
2007
• Main Phase: April 2007 – March 2011
Context & Objectives
Survey Design & Methodology
A robust and homogeneous methodology across countries Guarantee representative results for the euro area and the EU as a whole Repeat the survey in the same way each month Obtain sufficient samples of completed interviews detailed analysis Ensure comparability of results over time
Population Senior managers in sectors 65, 66 ,67 (NACE) Countries: DE, ES, FR, LUX, IT, NL, UK, PL, HU and CZ
Sampling Recruitment of a panel of respondents: (initial panel, approx. 2,400 people) Telephone recruitment Source: business directory, updated regularly good approximation of the
Universe Objective: 300-600 completed interviews each month during the whole year
Key Methodological Components
Questionnaire Content
Standard questionnaire
Repeated every month
Topics: overall business situation, demand for services and
employment
Quarterly questions
Asked in April, July, October, November
Topics: operating income/expenses, profitability, capital expenditure, fees charged for the services and competitive position
Scale questions : increase / remain unchanged / decrease
Questionnaire translated into national languages
Respondent can choose the language of the questionnaire
CATI-Web technology
Panel: telephone recruitment
Survey process
STEP 1
E-mail invitation + link to online questionnaire
STEP 2
Reminder
Questionnaire completion
STEP 3
STEP 4
Sample sizes and response rate
372
310
473
359
413
448 444
618
537
444
506 496 486 478
400 400 400 400
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Apr-
08
May-0
8
Jun-0
8
Jul-08
Aug-0
8
Sep-0
8
Oct-
08
Nov-0
8
Dec-0
8
Jan-0
9
Feb-0
9
Mar-
09
Apr-
09
May-0
9
Jun-0
9
Jul-09
Aug-0
9
Sep-0
9
April 2008 - September 2009
A response rate of 24% on average (min: 17% and max: 29%) is encouraging and in line with expectations
Non-response
From the moment of the recruitment and the actual invitation, people may have change their minds
Some people may not have time to access the questionnaire during the fieldwork period
Concerns about confidentiality and publication of the results
In some cases, invitation e-mails are blocked by the company’s firewall
Operators not motivated to respond to several waves
Crisis: Increasing mobility of operators
Reluctance to give out information about company
Reasons Measures
Letter signed by DG ECFIN explaining the scope of the survey
Regular contacts by phone or e-mail, in order to:
Some people were sent in advance the questionnaire in Word format, in order to:
Reassure them about the content of questions
Get agreement of their hierarchy
Prospect of having access to the survey results
Ask referral to panellist who wants to drop off
Results: monthly questions
Overall business situation
24
33 32
27 28
2018 18
1512 12
1719
2226
23
29
5451
46
52
46 4745 45 44
47 48 4750
4751
53
2422 22
20 20
3335
37
44
28 27 26
1822
5354
41
3435
40
16
Apr-
08
May-
08
Jun-0
8
Jul-0
8
Aug-0
8
Sep-0
8
Oct
-08
Nov-
08
Dec-
08
Jan-0
9
Feb-0
9
Mar-
09
Apr-
09
May-
09
Jun-0
9
Jul-0
9
Aug-0
9
Sep-0
9
Improved Remained unchanged Deteriorated
TOTAL Q1 - How has your business situation developed over the past 3 months? It has ...
17
107 8
-18-15
-6
-1-3
11
-22
-13
-32 -29
-25
-17-19
Demand for the company’s services
26
3135
38
28 29
18
2320
16 15 15
2117
24 2528
50 51
45
55
44
51
4044 43
45
51
46
5551 51
55
2521 20 19
17
2731
3741
2825 24
18
26
44
53
40
333436
18
Ap
r-0
8
May-
08
Jun
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8
Se
p-0
8
Oct
-08
Nov-
08
Dec-
08
Jan
-09
Fe
b-0
9
Mar-
09
Ap
r-0
9
May-
09
Jun
-09
Jul-
09
Au
g-0
9
Se
p-0
9
Increased Remained unchanged Decreased
TOTAL Q2 - How has demand (turnover) for your company’s services changed over the past 3 months? It has ...
1315
19
11
-19
-12 -11
-11
10
15
2
-25-25
-16
-13-14
Expectations in terms of demand for company’s services
31
3936
31
36 36
31
1922
17
2224
27 2729
24
3937
55
48 49 48 49 50
39
4845
47
5349
57 58 5759
50
55
13 1315
21
15 14
3033 34
36
2528
16 15 1417
117
Apr-
08
May-0
8
Jun-0
8
Jul-08
Aug-0
8
Sep-0
8
Oct-
08
Nov-0
8
Dec-0
8
Jan-0
9
Feb-0
9
Mar-
09
Apr-
09
May-0
9
Jun-0
9
Jul-09
Aug-0
9
Sep-0
9
Increase Remain unchanged Decrease
TOTAL Q3 - How do you expect the demand (turnover) for your company’s services to change over the next 3 months?
It will ...
21
10
21 22
11 1215
7
2830
18
26
1
-3-4
-19
-14 -12
Employment in the financial service sector
18
24
20
25 26
1614 13 14
10
16 1613
1517 16
13
6669 69
67
74
67
73
69 68
6264
7068 67 68 69
1311 11
8 710
19
14
2118
16 161821
71
66
7
1720
17
22
Ap
r-0
8
Ma
y-0
8
Jun
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8
Se
p-0
8
Oct
-08
No
v-0
8
De
c-0
8
Jan
-09
Fe
b-0
9
Ma
r-0
9
Ap
r-0
9
Ma
y-0
9
Jun
-09
Jul-
09
Au
g-0
9
Se
p-0
9
Increased Remained unchanged Decreased
TOTALQ4 - How has your firm’s total employment changed over the past 3 months? It has ...
17
9
1719
-4 -4 -3
1 0
-5-1
-5 -3-6
-11
678
Expectations in terms of employment
22
2623
18 1715
13 12 11 12 12 1210
16 16 15 16
72
67 66
7270
73
6967
7169
71
77
71 70 7173
710 11
911
1614
1917
1315 15
11
21
73
68
19
13
17
22
7
Ap
r-0
8
Ma
y-0
8
Jun
-08
Jul-
08
Au
g-0
8
Se
p-0
8
Oct
-08
No
v-0
8
De
c-0
8
Jan
-09
Fe
b-0
9
Ma
r-0
9
Ap
r-0
9
Ma
y-0
9
Jun
-09
Jul-
09
Au
g-0
9
Se
p-0
9
Increase Remain unchanged Decrease
TOTALQ5 - How do you expect your firm’s total employment to change over the next 3 months? It will ...
19
129
6
-5-3
31 0
5
-7
-1
-11-7
-5
-1
1214
Conclusions
Coherence/stability of the survey results:
Signs of quality of the sampling design
The questionnaire do not seem to pose any problem of misinterpretation/misunderstanding
Sensitive indicator
Encouraging response rate in line with expectations
For the next waves: continue the close monitoring of the fieldwork and anticipate any problem that might cause a decrease in response rate (e.g. lower motivation of respondents due to the participation to several survey waves)
Thank you for your kind attention
IPSOS Belgium
Head Office: Kroonlaan 159-164
1050 Brussels – Belgium
Operation Office: Waterloo Business Park
Drève Richelle 161, bât. J
1410 Waterloo
Phone 32-2-642.47.11
Fax 32-2-648.34.08
E-mail [email protected]