foundations of decision making - delta univ€¦ · 1. describe the steps in the decision-making...

35
Part 2 : Planning PowerPoint Presentation by Mohammed Ramadan Copyright © 2018 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Foundations of Decision Making

Upload: others

Post on 26-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Part 2: Planning

    PowerPoint Presentation by Mohammed

    Ramadan

    Copyright © 2018 Prentice Hall, Inc.

    All rights reserved.

    Chapter 4

    Foundations

    of

    Decision

    Making

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–2

    L E A R N I N G O U T C O M E S

    After reading this chapter, I will be able to:

    1. Describe the steps in the decision-making

    process.

    2. Identify the assumptions of the rational

    decision-making model.

    3. Explain the limits to rationality.

    4. Define certainty, risk, and uncertainty as they

    relate to decision making.

    5. Describe the actions of the bounded-rational

    decision maker.

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–3

    L E A R N I N G O U T C O M E S (cont’d)

    After reading this chapter, I will be able to:

    6. Identify the two types of decision problems and

    the two types of decisions that are used to

    solve them.

    7. Define heuristics and explain how they affect

    the decision-making process.

    8. Identify four decision-making styles.

    9. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of

    group decisions.

    10. Explain three techniques for improving group

    decision making.

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–4

    Decision-making

    • Decision-making process

    A set of eight steps that includes identifying a

    problem, selecting a solution, and evaluating the

    effectiveness of the solution

    • Problem

    A discrepancy between an existing and a desired

    state of affairs

    • Decision criteria

    Factors that are relevant in a decision

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–5

    Examples of Planning-Function Decisions

    What are the organization’s long-term objectives?

    What strategies will best achieve those objectives?

    What should the organization’s short-term

    objectives be?

    What is the most efficient means of completing

    tasks?

    What might the competition be considering?

    What budgets are needed to complete department

    tasks?

    How difficult should individual goals be?EXHIBIT 4.1

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–6

    The Decision-Making Process

    EXHIBIT 4.2

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–7

    Criteria and Weight in Car-Buying Decision

    (Scale of 1 to 10)

    EXHIBIT 4.3

    CRITERION WEIGHT

    Price 10

    Interior comfort 8

    Durability 5

    Repair record 5

    Performance 3

    Handling 1

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–8

    Assessment of Car Alternatives

    EXHIBIT 4.4

    INITIAL INTERIOR DURA- REPAIR

    ALTERNATIVES PRICE COMFORT BILITY RECORD PERFORMANCE HANDLING TOTAL

    Jeep Cherokee 2 10 8 7 5 5 37

    Ford Mustang 9 6 5 6 8 6 40

    Mercedes C230 8 5 6 6 4 6 35

    Pontiac Grand Am 9 5 6 7 6 5 38

    Mazda Tribute 5 6 9 10 7 7 44

    Dodge Durango 10 5 6 4 3 3 31

    Volvo S60 4 8 7 6 8 9 42

    Isuzu Axiom 7 6 8 6 5 6 38

    BMW 325 9 7 6 4 4 7 37

    Audi A6 5 8 5 4 10 10 42

    Toyota Camry 6 5 10 10 6 6 43

    Volkswagen Passat 8 6 6 5 7 8 40

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–9

    Weighting of Vehicles (Assessment Criteria X Criteria Weight)

    EXHIBIT 4.5

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–10

    Decision-making (cont’d)

    • Decision implementation

    Putting a decision into action; includes conveying the

    decision to the persons who will be affected by it and

    getting their commitment to it

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–11

    Making Decisions: The Rational Model

    • Certainty

    The implication that the outcome of every possible

    alternative is known

    • Uncertainty

    A condition under which there is not full knowledge of

    the problem and reasonable probabilities for

    alternative outcomes cannot be determined.

    • Risk

    The probability that a particular outcome will result

    from a given decision

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–12

    Assumptions of Rationality

    EXHIBIT 4.6

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–13

    Making Decisions: The Rational Model

    • Rational

    Describes choices that are consistent and value-

    maximizing within specified constraints

    • Bounded rationality

    Behavior that is rational within the parameters of a

    simplified model that captures the essential features

    of a problem

    • Satisfice

    Making a “good enough” decision

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–14

    Three Elements of Creativity

    EXHIBIT 4.7Source: T. M. Amabile, “Motivating Creativity in Organizations,” California Management Review (Fall 1997): 43.

    CreativityThe ability to produce

    novel and useful ideas

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–15

    Common Decision-making Errors

    • Heuristics: Using judgmental shortcuts

    Availability heuristic

    the tendency for people to base their judgments on

    information that is readily available to them

    Representative heuristic

    The tendency for people to base judgments of

    probability on things with which they are familiar

    Escalation of commitment

    An increased commitment to a previous decision

    despite negative information

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–16

    How Do Problems Differ?

    • Well-structured problems

    Straightforward, familiar, easily defined problems

    • Ill-structured problems

    New problems in which information is ambiguous or

    incomplete

    • Programmed decision

    A repetitive decision that can be handled by a routine

    approach

    • Nonprogrammed decisions

    Decisions that must be custom-made to solve unique and

    nonrecurring problems

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–17

    Programmed Decision-Making Aids

    • Policy

    A general guide that establishes parameters for

    making decisions about recurring problems

    • Procedure

    A series of interrelated sequential steps that can be

    used to respond to a well-structured problem (policy

    implementation)

    • Rule

    An explicit statement that tells managers what they

    ought or ought not to do (limits on procedural actions)

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–18

    Types of Problems, Types of Decisions, and

    Level in the Organization

    EXHIBIT 4.8

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–19

    Technology And Decision Making

    • Expert systems

    Software that acts like an expert in analyzing and solving ill-

    structured problems

    Use specialized knowledge about a particular problem

    area rather than general knowledge

    Use qualitative reasoning rather than numerical

    calculations

    Perform at a level of competence higher than that of

    nonexpert humans.

    • Neural networks

    Software that is designed to imitate the structure of brain

    cells and connections among them

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–20

    Decision Making: Styles

    • Directive style

    Characterizes the low tolerance for ambiguity and a

    rational way of thinking of individuals who are logical

    and efficient and typically make fast decisions that

    focus on the short term.

    • Analytic style

    Characterizes the high tolerance for ambiguity

    combined with a rational way of thinking of individuals

    who prefer to have complete information before

    making a decision.

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–21

    Decision Making: Styles (cont’d)

    • Conceptual style

    Individuals who tend to be very broad in outlook, to

    look at many alternatives, and to focus on the long

    run and often look for creative solutions.

    • Behavioral style

    Individuals who think intuitively but have a low

    tolerance for uncertainty; they work well with others,

    are open to suggestions, and are concerned about

    the individuals who work for them.

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–22

    Decision-Making Styles

    EXHIBIT 4.9

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–23

    Group Decision Making

    • Advantages

    Make more accurate

    decisions

    Provides more complete

    information

    Offers a greater diversity of

    experiences and

    perspectives

    Generates more

    alternatives

    Increases acceptance of a

    solution

    Increases the legitimacy of

    a decision.

    • Disadvantages

    Is more time-consuming

    and less efficient

    Minority domination can

    influence decision process

    Increased pressures to

    conform to the group’s

    mindset (groupthink)

    Ambiguous responsibility

    for the outcomes of

    decisions

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–24

    Improving Group Decision Making

    • Brainstorming

    An idea-generating process that encourages

    alternatives while withholding criticism

    • Nominal group technique

    A decision-making technique in which group

    members are physically present but operate

    independently

    • Electronic meeting

    A type of nominal group technique in which

    participants are linked by computer

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–25

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–26

    Payoff Matrix for VISA

    EXHIBIT QM–1

    VISA AMERICAN EXPRESS’

    MARKETING RESPONSE

    STRATEGY (IN MILLIONS OF $)

    CA1 CA2 CA3

    S1 13 14 11

    S2 9 15 18

    S3 24 21 15

    S4 18 14 28

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–27

    Regret Matrix for VISA

    EXHIBIT QM–2

    VISA AMERICAN EXPRESS’

    MARKETING RESPONSE

    STRATEGY (IN MILLIONS OF $)

    CA1 CA2 CA3

    S1 11 7 17

    S2 15 6 10

    S3 0 0 13

    S4 6 7 0

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–28

    Decision Tree and Expected Values for Renting a

    Large or Small Retail Space

    EXHIBIT QM–3

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–29

    The

    Breakeven

    Analysis

    EXHIBIT QM–4

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–30

    OBJECTIVE RATIO CALCULATION

    Liquidity test Current ratio _Current assets_

    Current liabilities

    Acid test Current assets level inventories

    Current liabilities

    Leverage test Debt-to-assets _Total debt_

    Total assets

    Times-interest-earned Profits before interest and taxes

    Total interest charges

    Operations test Inventory turnover Cost of sales

    Inventory

    Total-assets-turnover Revenues

    Total assets

    Profitability Profit margin-on-revenues Net profit after taxes

    Total revenues

    Return-on-investment Net profit after taxes

    Total assets

    Popular Financial Controls

    EXHIBIT QM–5

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–31

    Production Data for Virus Software

    EXHIBIT QM–6

    Number of Hours Required per Unit

    WINDOWS MAC MONTHLY PRODUCT

    DEPARTMENT VERSION VERSION CAPACITY (HOURS)

    Design 4 6 2,400

    Manufacture 2.0 2.0 900

    Profit per unit $18 $24

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–32

    Graphical Solution to Hernandez’s Linear

    Programming Problem

    EXHIBIT QM–7

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–33

    Queuing Theory

    • Queuing theory

    A technique that balances the cost of having a waiting

    line against the cost of service to maintain that line

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–34

    Determining the Most Economic Order

    Quantity

    EXHIBIT QM–8

  • Copyright © 2004 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. 4–35

    Economic Order Quantity

    • Economic order quantity (EOQ)

    A technique for balancing purchase, ordering,

    carrying, and stock-out costs to derive the optimum

    quantity for a purchase order