foundations 101 presented by: michael marcus consultants for community resources (847) 571-1802
TRANSCRIPT
Foundations 101Foundations 101
Presented by: Presented by:
Michael MarcusMichael Marcus
Consultants for Community ResourcesConsultants for Community Resources
(847) 571-1802(847) 571-1802
Distinguishing Characteristics of Distinguishing Characteristics of FoundationsFoundations
Foundation Type
Source of Funds
Geographic Focus
Kinds of Funds
Charge or Purpose Public Charity
Community: About 900 in
the U.S.
Contributions from
individuals, families, corporations,
and other entities
Local community
area
Designated, restricted, unrestricted,
“hybrid.” Donor/advisor
Broad, public benefits,
community needs in areas of health,
social service, education, arts and
humanities, and civic affairs
Classified as “public charity,” favorable tax implications, asset management by community-based trustee banks, public
distribution committee
Corporate: About 3,000 in
the U.S.
Corporate profits
Communities in which corporation does business
Not applicable
Determined by the corporation – scope may be broad or limited
Classified as private foundation, less favorable tax implication, asset management at
discretion of corporation, private
distribution committee
Independent Family: About 47,000 in the
U.S.
Private Assets Determined by the donors – local, national, or international
Not Applicable
Determined by the donors – scope may be broad or
limited
Classified as private foundation, less favorable tax
implications, asset management at discretion of the donors, private
distribution committee
Conversion: About 170 in
the U.S.
Sale of not-for-profit health
providers
Local Community
Area
Usually restricted to
health
Usually determined by documents of sale
Classified as Public Charity
Note: With thanks to the Chicago Community Trust,100 E Wacker Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60601 (312) 616-8000.,
2004 CONTRIBUTIONS: $254.00 BILLION 2004 CONTRIBUTIONS: $254.00 BILLION BY SOURCE OF CONTRIBUTIONSBY SOURCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS
$192.53Individuals
(75.8%)
$19.56Bequests
(7.7%)
$30.998Foundations
(12.2%)
$10.922Corporations
(4.3%)
Source: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy/Giving USA 2002Source: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy/Giving USA 2002
2004 CONTRIBUTIONS: $254.00 BILLION 2004 CONTRIBUTIONS: $254.00 BILLION BY TYPE OF RECIPIENT ORGANIZATIONBY TYPE OF RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION
$93.98Religion
(37%)
$30.48Gifts to Foundations & Unallocated Giving
(12%)
$5.08International Affairs
(2%)
$7.62Environment
(3%)$15.24
Public-Society(6%)
$15.24Arts, Culture
(6%)
$22.86Health(9%)
$25.4Human Services
(10%)
$38.1Education
(15%)
Source: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy/Giving USA 2002Source: AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy/Giving USA 2002
THE FOUNDATION GRANT THE FOUNDATION GRANT PROPOSALPROPOSAL
The most common format for foundation grant proposal includes six parts:
Executive summary; Description of the organization Need addressed by the proposal Project description (including a plan for
evaluation) Budget Appendix
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESSPROCESS
• Initial Screening • Review by Staff• Preparation for Board Action • Board Action • Notifying the Applicant • Staff Follow-up • Reporting • Closing the File
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Initial Screening:– Assignment to Staff – Sufficient information – Development of project folder – Determine relationship to foundation’s
policy and program focus – Eligibility, i.e. 501 (c) (3), geography, etc
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Review by Staff :– Further consideration of relationship to
foundation focus – Evaluation of utility of the project – Evaluation of organizational capacity – Review of time table and cost estimates – Review of the organization’s budget and
strategic fundraising plan – Other project and organizational funders
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Review by Staff :– Relationship to other funding made by
the foundation Evaluation of utility of the project
– Review of evaluation component – Submittal to technical experts for
outside review
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Review by Staff :– Site visit, not your ordinary dog and
pony show – Other project and organizational
funders – Staff decision, i.e. hold for further
study, recommends grant, recommend decline, return for re-write and amendment.
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION • Preparation for Board Action
– Summary of proposal prepared and distributed to the Board of Directors or Distribution Committee, including
• history of similar projects • statement of the relationship to foundation
program, policies, and focus • staff recommendations including
contingency requirements, i.e. matching grants, budget revisions, staff hiring, program plan, timelines, etc.
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION • Board Action
– Discussion in light of knowledge, experience, and interests of Board members, Foundation policy and program focus, and available funds:
• Grant or decline • Grant with contingencies • Refer back to Staff for further study .
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Notifying the Applicant – Letter to the grantee including :
• Grant or decline • Grant with contingencies • Refer back to Staff for further study .
– Letter from grantee acknowledging the grant – Transmittal of grant payments on schedule
– Notification of decline, almost always by letter - a call to follow-up is usually okay.
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Reporting – Semi-annual fiscal and program
narrative reports received from grantees;
– Classification of projects in grant taxonomy;
– Annual written report published by the Foundation and made available to the public;
– Reports filed with the IRS
THE GRANTMAKING THE GRANTMAKING PROCESS: APPLICATION PROCESS: APPLICATION
• Closing the File – Make certain project folders contain all
correspondence, reports, and required IRS materials;
– Organization of file for permanent storage.
© Michael S. Marcus, 2002
Private Foundation Private Foundation Grant Proposal ProcessGrant Proposal Process
Michael MarcusMichael Marcus
Consultants for Community ResourcesConsultants for Community Resources
1123 Hull Terrace1123 Hull Terrace
Evanston, IL 60202Evanston, IL 60202
[email protected]@aol.com
847-424-9106 (FAX)847-424-9106 (FAX)
847-571-1802 (Direct)847-571-1802 (Direct)