forwards comments to each specific salp category,per ... · ppcl/nrc meeting on health physics...

A~CEXZRATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONSTRA,'EON SYSTEMREGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:8808040085 DOC.DATE: 88/07/27 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKETFACIL:50-387 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva 05000387

50-388 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva 05000388AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

KEISER,H.W. Pennsylvania Power 6 Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

.RUSSELL,W.T. Region 1, Ofc of the Director

SUBJECT: Responds to SALP rept for 1988.Viewgraphs re health physicsimprovements s maint enhancement program encl.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE40D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR I ENCL j SIZE:TITLE: Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance (SALP) Report

NOTES:LPDR 2 cys Transcripts.LPDR 2 cys Transcripts.

05000387S05000388

RECIPIENTID, CODE/NAME

PDl-2 LATHADANZ,M

INTERNAL: ACRSAEOD/DOACOMMISSIONNRR MORISSEAU,DNRR/DLPQ/PEB llNRR/DREP/EPB 10NRR/DRIS DIR 9ANRR/DRIS/SGB 9DNRR/PMAS/ILRB120 BERMANI JREG FIL 02

COPIESLTTR ENCL

1 01 1

2 21 15 51 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1

RECIPIENTID CODE/NAME

PD1-2 PD

AEOD BAILEYI BAEOD/DSP/TPABDEDRONRR/DLPQ/HFB 10NRR/DOEA/EAB 11NRR/DREP/RPB 10NRR/DRIS/RSGB 9NRR/DRIS/SIB 9ANUDOCS-ABSTRACT-OGC/HDS2RGN1 FILE 01

COPIESLTTR ENCL

1 1

1 01 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 1

EXTERNAL: H ST LOBBY WARDNRC PDR

NOTES

1 11 1

2 2

LPDRNSIC

2 21 1

R

I

h

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 37 ENCL 35

Pennsylvania Power 8 Light CompanyTwo North Ninth Street ~ Allentown, PA 18101 ~ 215/7705151

JUL 27 $88

Harold W. KeiserSenior Vice President. Nuclear215/770 4194

Mr. William T. RussellRegional Administrator, Region IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission475 Allendale RoadKing of Prussia, PA 19406

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATIONRESPONSE TO 1988 SALPPLA-3066 FILE R41-2

Docket Nos. 50-387.and 50-388

Dear Mr. Russell:

We appreciated the opportunity to meet with you and your staff on July 7, 1988to review the latest Region 1 assessment of PPSL's performance. While werecognize that the SALP Board Report was generally favorable, we welcome yoursuggestions and will continue to seek to improve our performance in all areas.

In reviewing the report we noted several concerns of NRC. Most of these werediscussed at the meeting and we believe these discussions were mutuallybeneficial.

Attached to this letter are copies of the presentations made at the meetingand PP&L's comments to each specific SALP category. Where weaknesses wereidentified our corrective action strategy has been included.

Very truly yours,

H. W. Keiser

Attachments

cc: NRC Document Control Desk (original)NRC Region IMr. F. I. Young, Sr. Resident InspectorMr. M. C. Thadani, NRC Project Manager

8808040085 880727PDR *DOCK 05000387G . PNU

1

SALP COMMENTS

SALP CATEGORY —PLANT OPERATIONS (A)h

'PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Plant Operations.Isolated instances of valve misalignment and post maintenance/modificationtesting have occurred; however, PP&L believes our corrective actions takenhave alleviated these concerns.

PP&L believes our upgraded corrective action program, initiated following the1986 SALP report, is successful in effectively addressing open issues. Theearly events, identified in this SALP report, are indicative of a program inits infancy. Events that occurred later in the period were handledeffectively.

SALP CATEGORY — CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS (B)

PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in the area of Chemistry and RadiologicalControls. Specific management actions PP&L is taking to address the „

weaknesses identified in the report include: establishment of a permanenthighly qualified staff, increased worker involvement and raising of thestation work practice standards, upgrading the station's contamination controlprogram and improved containment work management. The status of 29 specificitems identified by PP&L are included in the attached copies of thepresentations.

Weaknesses identified in the chemistry program are being vigorously addressedand include: upgrading the chemistry specification program, enhancingchemistry monitoring, implementing selected chemistry system enhancements,enhancing technician training and upgrading the waste management program.

SALP CATEGORY —MAINTENANCE (C)

PP&L concurs with the NRC assessment in this area. PP&L considers maintenanceto be one of our strengths. This was further confirmed by the SALP category 1

rating. We also believe in continual improvement; therefore, the maintenanceenhancement program was initiated, in 1986. The most recent initiativesinclude: review of the maintenance organization and staffing, and review ofthe interface and control of support work forces. Specific highlights of theprogram can be found in PP&L presentations made at the SALP meeting.Corrective actions taken to address operational testing following maintenanceand modification work will be addressed at the NRC-PP&L management meetingtentatively scheduled for September 1988.

SALP CATEGORY — SURVEILLANCE (D)

PP&L concurs with the surveillance assessment made in the SALP report. Noweaknesses in the surveillance program were identified during the period.

SALP CATEGORY —EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (E)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made on Emergency Preparedness. Noweaknesses in this program were identified during the period.

To further improve emergency preparedness, PP&L has initiated efforts to makeemergency exercises more realistic. PP&L invited INPO to conduct anassistance visit in emergency planning. The focus of the assistance visit isimproving in-plant simulation during exercises by transferring techniques usedsuccessfully at other nuclear facilities. PP&L will also use the trainingSimulator in conducting the 1988 Health Physics Drill; this shouldsignificantly improve realism for the operators.

SALP CATEGORY — SECURITY AND SAFEGUARDS (F)

PP&L concurs with the Security and Safeguards assessment, made by the NRC. Noweaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.

SALP CATEGORY —REFUELING AND OUTAGE MANAGEMENT (G)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of refueling and outagemanagement. Although a few examples of potential management lapses wereidentified in the report and at the SALP meeting, Outage Management played amajor role in resolving and coordinating the corrective actions associatedwith these events. We consider it a critical asset to the efficient operationof the plant. PP&L has and is continuing to take steps to determine the rootcauses of the events that occurred during the outage. A Unit 2 2nd refuelingand inspection outage task force has been created to determine and resolve theissues surrounding the major events that occurred during this outage. Thestatus of this committee's activities will be presented at the NRC-PP&Lmanagement meeting tentatively scheduled for September 1988.

SALP CATEGORY —LICENSING ACTIVITIES (H)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in this area. Although no weaknesses inLicensing activities were identified during the period an issue related toactions submitted on an emergency basis was noted. PP&L will be sensitive tothese concerns when processing emergency actions in the future.

SALP CATEGORY —ENGINEERING SUPPORT (I)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the Engineering Support area.Equipment Qualification (EQ) weaknesses identified in the SALP report arebeing addressed. With the creation of a dedicated EQ staff in 1987,enhancements to the EQ program, which include the SALP issues are beingundertaken.

At the enforcement conference on June 30, 1988, NRC indicated that they werepleased with PP&L presentations and our efforts to address the EQ issues.

SALP CATEGORY —ASSURANCE OF UALITY (J)

PP&L concurs with the assessment made in the area of Assurance of Quality. No

weaknesses in these programs were identified during the SALP reporting period.

SALP CATEGORY —TRAINING AND UALIFICATIONEFFECTIVENESS (K)

PPGL concurs with the assessment made in these areas. PP6L recognizes thatthe current simulator does not meet the March 1991 regulatory requirements andis therefore undertaking a major simulator upgrade modification project.Management will closely monitor the progress of this project.

HEALTH PHYSICS

IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES

o THE 4 INITIATIVES RESULTED IN 29 INDIVIDUALACTIONS

o 24 OF 29 ACTIONS COMPLETE

o THE REMAINING 5 SCHEDULED FOR COMPt ETION BY YEAR END

HEALTH PHYSICS

IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVESJANUARY 1988 STATUS

o ESTABLISH A PERMANENT HIGHLY QUALIFIED STAFF.

o INCREASE WORKER INVOLVEMENT AND RAISE THE

STATION WORK PRACTICE STANDARDS.

o UPGRADE THE STATION'S CONTAMINATION CONTROL

PROGRAM.

o IMPROVE CONTAINMENT WORK MANAGEMENT.

OUTAGE CRITIIXE

ujTAGL. TASK l=ORCE INPO OUTAGEASSESSYENT

INITIATIVES

SCilE YFF RITUALASSESS%fl

INPO PLANTASSESS'BIT

PPCL/NRC MEETING ON HEALTH PHYSICS

JANUARY 29, 1988

PP&L COMMITMENTS .

ITEM RESPONSIBLE

GROUP

STATUS/

COMMITMENT

DATE

1) TERMINATE USE OF TEMPORARY

SUMPS IN CONTAINMENT,

TECH/OUTAGE

MANAGEMENT

COMPLETE

2) UPGRADE FREQUENCY AND CONTENT

OF HP/WORKER COMMUNICATIONS INCONTAINMENT.

HEALTH PHYSICS COMPLETE

3) PROVIDE REAL TIME AIR MONITORING

EQUIPMENT AT 3 ELEVATIONS INCONTAINMENT.


4) FORM INTERDEPARTMENTAL TASK

FORCE ON INSUlATION.

A) PREPARE GUIDELINES FOR

INSULATION HANDLING.

5) REINFORCE ROVING IN-CONTAINMENT

LINE SUPERVISION.

MANAGEMENT

ASSISTANT

SUPERINTENDENT

COMPLETE

COMPLETE

A) ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR AND

REQUIRE IN-PROGRESS ALARA

REVIEWS FOR NON-HP SUPERVISORS.

B) . CONDUCT TRAINING OF NON-HP

SUPERVISORS CONDUCTING IN-PROGRESS ALARA REVIEWS.

ITEM RESPONSIBLEGROUP

STATUS/COMMITMENT

DATE

6) PROVIDE PPRL SENIOR TECHNICIANS

AT CONTAINMENT AND REFUEL FLOOR

CONTROL POINTS DURING NORMAL

WORK DAYS.


7) TWO ADDITIONAL HEALTH

PHYSICISTS IN PLACE NOW.


8) RECRUIT TWO ADDITIONAL

PERMANENT HEALTH PHYSICISTS,

9) RECRU IT TEN ADDITIONALPPRL TECHNICIANS.

10) PROMOTE SIX HP TECHNICIANS

TO SENIOR TECHNICIANS.

HEALTH PHYSICS ONE HIRED

RECRUITING ONE

HEALTH PHYSICS ALL IN

TRAINING


11) CONDUCT UNIT 2 SRIO.WITHSEASONED ALARA STAFF. (STAFF

THAT WAS IN PLACE FOR UNIT 1 TRIO).


12) CONDUCT STATION SUPERVISORS

AWARENESS TRAINING.PERFORMANCE.

ENHANCEMENT

TEAM

COMPLETE

13) CONDUCT STATION WORKERS

TRAINING.WORK GROUPS COMPlETE

14) DISTRIBUTE AWARENESS CARDS

AND POSTERS.k

15) DESIGNATE PPRL TRAINING

COORDINATOR FOR HP

TECHNICIAN TRAINING.

WORK GROUPS COMPLETE


ITEM RESPONSIBLE. GROUP

STATUS/COMMITMENT

DATE

16) INCORPORATE UNIT 1 TRIO

CRITIQUE ITEMS INTO CONTRACTOR

TECHNICIAN TRAINING (UPGRADE

TRAINING AND COMPLETE OJT) .


17) CONDUCT WEEKLY SENIOR MANAGEMENT

INDUSTRIAL AND RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY

REVIEWS. 8:00 AN MONDAY MORNING

MEETING,

SUPERINTENDENT ON-GOING

18) REVIEW AND UPGRADE RADIOLOGICAL

CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM.

19) INSTALL TEN WHOLE BODY.

FRISKERS.

HEALTH PHYSICS 3RD QTR 88

HEALTH PHYS I CS COMPLETE

20) INSTALL THREE TOOL

CONTAMINATION MONITORS.


21) INSTALL AUTOMATED HYDRO NUCLEAR

TRASH SORTING EQUIPMENT.

22) REDES IGN AND RELOCATE UNIT 2

CONTROL ZONE ACCESS.

23) IMPLEMENT UPGRADED CONTAMINATED

HOSE CONTROL PROGRAM.

IEG

IEG

MAINTENANCE

4TH QTR '88

4TH QTR '88

COMPLETE

24) ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY fOR

VERIFI CATION OF ACCEPTABLE

OPERATION OF HEPA UNITS.

HEAl TH PHYSICS COMPLETE

ITEM RESPONSIBLEGROUP

STATUS/COMMITMENT

DATE

25) IMPLEMENT A HOT PARTICLE PROGRAM

26) ESTABLISH RESPIRATORY PROTECTION

CRITERIA.


HEALTH PHYSICS . COMPLETE

27) IMPLEMENT SPECIFIC CONTROL POINT

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTED 'AREAS.


28) COMPLETE REVIEW OF EXPIRED

HEALTH PHYSICS PROCEDURE


A) REVIEW STATION PROGRAM FOR

CONTROL OF PROCEDURE

EXP I RATIONS 8 REVIEWS.

SUPERINTENDENT

29) REEVALUATE HOW TO HANDLEALARA'RIEFINGS

FOR PEOPLE NOT

ATTENDING PRE- JOB BRIEFING.


HEALTH PHYSICS

IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVESJUNE 1988 STATUS

o TRAIN NEW TECHNICIANS AND COMPLETE STAFFING HEALTH

PHYSICIST POSITION

o CONTINUE INITIATIVES TO RAISE WORK PRACTICE

STANDARDS AND IMPROVE CONTAMINATION CONTROL

WORK PRACTICES

FACILITY ENHANCEMENTS

TOOL MANAGEMENT

o UPGRADE THE STATION'S RADWASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

o UPGRADE THE INTERNAL DOSIMETRY PROGRAM.

o ENHANCE THE RWP SYSTEM.

o STUDY EXPANDING SCOPE OF REAL TIME AIR MONITORING

CHEMISTRY PROGRAM SALP EVALUATION

IDENTIFIED STRENGTHS

o EFFECTIVE WATER CHEMISTRY CONTROL PROGRAM.

o UPGRADED SAMPLING PROGRAM.

o TIMELY CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TO DEVIATIONS

OF CRITICAL VARIABLES.

o GOOD AGREEMENT WITH NRC: I MOBILE LABORATORY.


IDENTIFIED WEAKNESSES

o LABORATORY QA/QC PROGRAM.

o VENDOR PROGRAM CONTINUITY.

o SITE CHEMISTRY LABORATORY PROGRAM.

o MANAGEMENT ATTENTION TO WEAKNESSES


o ACTIONS IN THESE AREAS HAVE NOW BEEN COMPLETED

AND ARE CLOSED. (INSPECTION REPORT 50-387/88-05AND 50-388/88-04)

o BELIEVE OUR PROGRAMS ARE NOW IN PLACE

AND FUNCTIONING.

o ENHANCEMENTS CONTINUE.

o RESULTS OF OUR PROGRAM CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.

STEAM CYCLEOUT—01"—.SPECIFICATIONHOURS

IIlII1

I

legendEn uNiT i

KB UtliT 2

CY10 C'00

5Cjn q

tDai

a n .r'n ni00Eo n

C 1

ei n

1985I l> '<t JU 4I>

1986 1987

AUXII.IAPYSYSTEMSOU'I' OF—SPECIFICATION HOURS

Le gran(3C3 1.1I.IT 1

EEEI UNIT 2

00 ~<O OW <I>

tp

d

r

r

//<<II.;;< I. <<Ltil.«51<ii', <.: I.«: .Ilier«i<:I<I I:<IH i ITI' « .'- T<< r<«<.rli«rli I: IrrII I I< IT«1< O'I:I'< l.l<'.i.

r rrr'./r/

r r'

/ /y(iOO

rrr/

00 00C'0 N

O OP4 Kl

o >

O Or<g 'P

ro M g m0< (7)

I I< "..<.I 3« 4<i

1985I <! i'-'I< i'I(I II<

1986I li .Il«Il 4«

1987

thT I K3 h (. TAT PlPT3 T .i T)f~o A T AD%"j.J.M N, gg~K CY. j.j V I WLb 3~4.lDMka 'ALWJLg II

.QC SAhIPLES

I egendCZ t<VMBER C C SI>APPLES

III '" C)lSAGREEMEPIT

/

r

rr

/

,Ji/L,O

cl gn

J» 4>.>

1985l I> '» 3l> 4»

1986I (I "» 3» 'l»

1987

CHEMISTRY INITIATIVES,

o UPGRADE THE CHEMISTRY SPECIFICATION PROGRAM,

CHEMISTRY MANUAL INPLACE

FULLY IMPLEMENTED DEC 1989

o ENHANCE OUR CHEMISTRY MONITORING.

INLINE INSTRUMENTATION UPGRADE

CHEMISTRY DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

o IMPLEMENT SELECTED CHEMISTRY SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS.

ORGANIC TREATMENT METHODS

REACTOR WATER CONDUCTIVITY

FEEDWATER METALS

o ENHANCE TRAINING OF TECHNICIANS.

UPGRADE CLASSROOM AND OJT

EXTERNAL TRAINING

UPGRADE CONTRACTOR PROGRAM

o UPGRADE THE STATION WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

MINIMIZE WASTE GENERATION

o FOR 1989 THIS EFFORT WILL COST APPROXIMATELY

6 MAN YEARS AND I/2 MILLION DOLLARS.

DEVELOPMENT OF MAINTENANCE

ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

1986

1986

1986

1986

1986

isa QUARTER

2ND QUARTER

2ND QUARTER

4TH QUARTER

NOVEMBER

EXTERNAL CONSULTANT

ANALYSIS

INTERNAL MANAGEMENT

ASSESSMENT

INPO EVALUATION

INTERNAL QUESTIONNAIRE

DEPT, MAINTENANCE

SEMINAR

1987

1987

1987

1987

1988

1988

1988

JANUARY

JANUARY

APRIL

JUNE

FEBRUARY

FEBRUARY

MAY

ISSUED MAINTENANCE

ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

MEETING ON SALP REPORT

6-DAY MAINTENANCE WORKSHOP

NUCLEAR SAFETY ASSESSMENT

GROUP EVALUATION

PPRL SPONSORED MAINTENANCE

SEMINAR

INPO EVALUATION

SALP EVALUATION

MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

OBJECTIVES

JUNE 1987

0 IMPROVE THE ORGANIZATION CLIMATE OF MAINTENANCE BY MEANS

OF UPGRADING THE LEADERSHIP CAPABILITY OF MANAGERS/

SUPERVISORS AT ALL LEVELS.

0 CLEARLY DEFINE THE FUNCTIONAL SCOPE OF RESPONSIBILITIES

OF THE PLANT MAINTENANCE SECTION AND OTHER MAJOR INTERFACE

GROUPS.

0 UPGRADE AND INTEGRATE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE MAINTENANCE

SECTION PRODUCTION AND PLANNING GROUPS TO THE POINT OF

MAXIMUM UTILITY AND EFFICIENCY.

0 IMPROVE THE ABILITY OF THE CRAFTSMAN THROUGH IMPROVED

TRAINING TO MORE EFFECTIVELY AND EFFICIENTLY PERFORM

PHYSICAL WORK IN THE FIELD.

0 DEVELOP INTEGRATED, FUNCTIONAL SHORT AND LONG TERM

STATION WORK SCHEDULES.

0 DEVELOP THE ABILITYTO CAPTURE AND ADDRESS RECURRING

MAINTENANCE PROBLEMS.

k

0 ESTAB ISH FEEDBACK PROGRAMS WHICH ENABLE INPUT FROM

CRAFTSMEN TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DECISION PROCESS.

MAINTENANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM

PRESENT ASSESSMENT

o MAINTENANCE PERFORMANCE CONTINUES AT LEVEL 1.

o INITIAL ENHANCEMENT INITIATIVES COMPLETE

ORGANIZATIONAL AND STAFFING CHANGES

VALVE PROGRAM

HEAT EXCHANGER PROGRAM

PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES

RELIABILITYCENTERED MAINTENANCE

EPTAR

EXPANDED UTILIZATION OF SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS

o ADDITIONAL INITIATIVES IDENTIFIED

REVIEW ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING AT NEXT LEVEL

OF THE ORGANIZATION

REVIEW INTERFACE AND CONTROL OF SUPPORT WORK.

FORCES

CONTINUE PROGRAMS BEGUN LAST YEAR

UNIT 2 2RIO PERSPECTIVES

o CHALLENGING OUTAGE

o UNIT IN EXCELLENT MATERIAL CONDITION

o TWO MAJOR INCIDENTS

RESIN DRAINDOWN

STEAM SEPARATOR/F.W. NOZZLE

o INCIDENTS ARE OF SERIOUS CONCERN

MAJOR INVESTIGATION/CORRECTIVE ACTIONS UNDERWAY

OUTAGE TASK FORCE ESTABLISHED/NEAR COMPLETION

o THIS OUTAGE COMPARED TO PREVIOUS OUTAGES

OUTAGE EVE TS COMPARISON

OUTAGE

ESF

AC IONS

INADVERTENT

STARTS.

MATER

IAMMER SPILLS HP

REMI IVlTY

EVENTS LOSS SDC

U1 1RIO 12

U1 2RIO

02 1RIO

U1 3RIO

U2 2RIO

UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE

OBJECTIVE

THROUGH PARTICIPATION OF WORKING LEVEL MEMBERS OF PLANT STAFF

DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE THE OPERATION AND SAFETY

OF SSES,

o REVIEW SELECTED INCIDENTS DURING THE UNIT 2

2 RIO AND DETERMINE ROOT CAUSE(S).

o REVIEW ROOT CAUSE(S) FOR COMMONALITY OR

GENERIC IMPLICATIONS.

PLANT DESIGN

PROGRAMS, PROCEDURES

PEOPLE, TRAINING

o DEVELOP RECOMMENDATIONS.

UNIT 2 RIO INCIDENT PREVENTION

IMPROVEMENTS

PLANT

DESIGN OPERATION

AND

MAINTENANCE

PROTECTION

IN

DEPTH

PROGRAMS

PROCEDURES

TRAINING

PEOPLE

ROOT CAUSE

ROOT CAUSE: THE MOST BASIC REASON(S) FOR AN EFFECT,

WHICH IF CORRECTEDi WILL PREVENT RECURRENCE

ROOT CAUSE CRITERIA:

~ A SOLUTION THAT PREVENTS RECURRENCE

~ A SOLUTION THAT IS WITHIN OUR CONTROL

A SOLUTION THAT Al LOWS US TO MEET OUR OTHER

OBJECTIVES

FINDING ROOT CAUSE:

1. DEFINE THE PRIMARY EFFECT, THE EFFECT/PROBLEM THAT~ YOU ARE TRYING TO PREVENT FROM RECURRING.

2, DETERNINE THE CAUSE OF THE EFFECT. BE ABLE TO BACK

UP ANY CAUSE WITH FACT,

3.. CATEGORIZE ROOT CAUSES:

A. Pl NIT DESIGN/EQUIPMENT

B. PROGRAMS/PROCEDURES

C. TRAINING/PEOPLE

0. DETENIlK A SOLUTION THAT MEETS THE ROOT CAUSE

CRITERIA.

UNIT 2 2RI 0 TASK FORCE

I&C SUPERVISOR — LEADER

SR. ENGINEER — QC

SR. ENGINEER — OPERATIONS

ASST. FOREMAN — I&C

SR. ENGINEER — NSAG

UNIT SUPERVISOR

UNIT COORDINATOR

ASST. FOREMAN — MAINTENANCE

CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR

SR. HEALTH PHYSICIST

SR. COMPLIANCE ENGINEER

MAINTENANCE PLANNING & SCHEDULING SUPERVISOR

UNIT 2 2RIO TASK FORCE

PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS

o ELECTRICAL PANELS

o REFUELING FLOOR ACTIVITIES

o INDIVIDUALACCOUNTABILITY

o PROCEDURAL ADHERENCE

TASK FORCE COMPLETION JULY 51st

OUTAGE CRITIQUE AUGUST 15TH

REVIEW MEETING SEPTEMBER

~Plant Operations (technical, system engineer)~ Chemistry and Rad Controls (chemistry}~ Survei 1 lance (IS I)~ Refueling &. Outage Mgmt (system engineers,

fire protection, fuel design}~ Licensing (emergency response capability,

design)~ Engineering Support (design, risk assessment,

seismic qual, environmental qual, resources,industry events analysis)

~ Environmental Qualification (EQ)~ Seismic Qualification (SQRT)~ Piping and Support Analysis~ Chemistry and Materials~ ISI~ Fire Protection~ Risk Asse'ssment (PRA, IPE)~ Life Extension~ Part Engineering~ Conf iguration Management

1

~ 1980-81 — Contractors prepared EQ binders~ 1982 — NRC Audit~ 1985 — Construction phase done~ 1984 — EQ handled by design disciplines~ 1985 — PL management self-assessment~ 1986 — Dedication of individual to EQ

— Binder upgrade initiated— Department program established— NRC inspection and audit

~ 1987 — EQ staff created

~ Initiated preparation of Design Basis Doc's

~ Completed external reviews of Appendix R

~ Completed external reviews of ConfigurationManagement

~ Conducted an is-built pilot program

~ Conducting an SSFI using outside people thissummer

~ Basic Elements~ Documentation — Completeness

— Aud i tab i1ity— Usefulness— Specialists— General Training

~ Updating"~ Assessments — Internal

— External— Regulatory

NUCLEAR DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROCESS

BASIC ELEMENTS

NRC INPuT

SPECIFIC EXAMPLES

MANAGING FOR EXCELLENCE

VISION OF EXCELLENCE

PLANS/PROCESSES FOR ACCOMPLISHING WORK

\

DEPARTMENT PLANNING SESSIONS

PERFORMANCE MONITORING


COMPANY AND

DEPARTMENT

OBJECTIVES

NUCLEAR

INDUSTRY

PERFORMANCE

NUCLEAR

DEPARTMENT

PERFORMANCE

EXTERNAL

INFLUENCES

DEVELOPMENT

OF FIVE'YEAR GOALS

AND

STRATEGIC PLAN

NEAR-TERM

OP ERAT I NG

CONSTRAINTS

VISIONOF

EXCELLENCE

DEVELOPMENT

OF NEAR-TERM

PERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVES

ANNUAL

PERFORMANCE

. OBJECTIVES

INITIATIVES

PERFORMANCE AREAS

OPERATIONAL

PERSONNEL

NUCLEAR SAFETY

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

COST

PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE

PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT

PRODUCT/SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS

HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES

PERSONNEL SAFETY,

1988 — 1992 STRATEGIC PLAN

GOAL ll - RADIATION EXPOSURE

ENSURE THAT STATION RAD I ATION EXPOSURE IS LESS THAN 592 MAN-REM

PER UNIT CYCLE IN 1992,

1,

~ ~

1200COLLECTIVE RADIATIONEXPOSURE

BWR AVERAGE 1200

1000)003 Legend

K3 INDUSTRYKH SUSQUEHANNA

1000

BOO

CL

Fe aoo-I

.784

622

523

BOO

l

Ed00

lKIC

400311

400

200 200

0

41

1983 1985Year

1986 1987

ll

~% ~

1988 EXPECTED EXPOSURE

At the beginning of each year, the Nuclear Oepartment establishes an estimateof the radiation exposure expected to be accrued as a result of the operationof the Susquehanna units. This exposure estimate is based upon expected workand includes the benefits of implemented ALARA actions and practices.Exposure goals are then established which additionally incorporate planned.ALARA actions and a 10% challenge factor which is applied to selected work.For 1988 the goal is 538 man-rem and the estimate is 614 man-rem. Actualperformance below the estimate implies that ALARA .performance is improving; .

performance below the goal means we are meeting department objectives. Alsoindicated is INPO accumulated data for Annual Exposure received by other BWR's

through 12/87. All data is based on thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) data.Because TLDs are processed at the end of each month, actual data will lag thecalendar month by one month.

1400 1400

1200. INPO MEOIAN 1200

1000. 1000

IC 800.0

4)

600

E

CD

400.

ACTUAL ~ yO~ yy>

~ g00 ~ gal~ ggOipse+

~ ~ 8+~"r ~'r

0 S IIII1 I1 P 0 0 S S 0 S 1 1 > > S 0 0 IIS 0 I0 > 0 l1 I0 P O 0 0 0 0 0 1INPO BEST QUARTILE

ESTIMATE~ I~ OSI ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~I~ 0 ~ I~

198S DEPT. GOAL

Q

I-8OO a

Q

-600 ODED

400

200 .200

This Month:

'85 '86 '87 J f al A Il J J A 5 0 M D

1988

The accumulated dose at Susquehanna for the month of April was 174 man-rem

commensurate with the scope of outage work in progress.

5-1

1989 — 1995 STRATEGIC PLAN

GOAL ll - HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES

ACHIEVE AND NAINTAIN HEALTH PHYSICS PERFORNANCE WHICH PLACES SSES

WITHIN THE FOREFRONT OF THE INDUSTRY, QUANTITATIVELYSTATEDif

O ATTAIN AN ANNUAL STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE> MEASURED AS

A THREE-YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE> LESS THAN 672 MAN"REM,

THREE (3) YEAR ROLLING AVERAGE

STATION RADIATION EXPOSURE

1985/1986/1987

1986/1987/1988

1991/1992/1993

ACTUAL

852 MAN-REN

662 MAN-REM"

GOAL

672 MAN-REM

" BASED ON 1988 EXPOSURE MEETING GOAL OF 538 MAN-REM


COMPANY AND

DEPARTMENT

OBJECTIVES

NUCLEAR

INDUSTRY

PERFORMANCE

NUCLEAR

DEPARTMENT

PERFORMANCE

EXTERNAL

INFLUENCES

DEVEI OPMENT

OF F!VE YEAR GOALS

AND

STRATEG I C PLAN

NEAR-TERN

OPERATING

CONSTRAINTS

VISIONOF

EXCELLENCE

DEVELOPMENT

OF NEAR-TERN

PERFORMANCE

OB JECTIVES

ANNUAL

PERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVES

INITIATIVES

GOAL 11: HEALTH PHYSICS PRACTICES

GOAL STATENENT ENHANCENENTS;

0 ATTAIN A PERSONNEL CONTAMINATION RATE OF LESS THAN 20

CONTAMINATIONS PER 10i000 RWP ENTRIES.

0 MAINTAIN THE TOTAL CONTAMINATED AREA LESS THAN 7 SQUARE

FEET s

0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF RADIOLOGICAL OCCURRENCE REPORTS TO

ON AN ANNUAL BASIS,

0 LIMIT THE NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS RECEIVING GREATER THAN 2000

MREM TO 5 PER YEARs,

0 NAINTAIN ALL INTERNAL EXPOSURES LESS THAN 2X NPBB,

800-

700-

600-

T =769

AGE DISTRIB 'N OFCORRECTIVE ACTI N ITEMS

VS: EQD OF 1987 GOALDATA AS OF 12-10-87

GOAL REPRESEN1STHE FOLLOWINGREDUCTIONS FROM6-8-87 TOTALS:1982 100%o1983 —90%1984 S07o1985 —70%1986 60%

V)500- "-

I—4

4oo- "-

bJCD

300- .-.

Z

T =491

50 T= 424

—331T=30137

29

T = 370

97 T—

T =279

200- """

100

491 8380

26 T =232

72

58

T =206~p T =168

25

.")1 29

228V4

M5 1m i:-, P()

ISSUE. YLAf<I::.1 I')82 0I. ) I')H 'i

I ~'I 19)34

I: 1 IO)3'i ."i)

I') c) I Ir'r)

AGE OI STRIBUTION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION ITEMSPI 2.2.5

The pepartment has established a number of administrative programs which serveto identify deficiencies in need of corrective action. To ensure timelyresolution and to counter tendencies towards growth in the backlog, managementattention is focused on the age distribution of these corrective action items.Shown below is the total number of Nonconformance Reports, Significant OperatingOccurrence Reports, NRC i tems and NgA Audit Findings (issued against PlantStaff) that remain open, broken down by year of issuance. Management'sobjective is to reduce the total number of items from 961 at the beginning ofthe year to 189 by the end of 1988. This goal represents closure of lpp% of the1983 items, 90% of the 1984 items, and 80% of the items from 1985-1987.

1000

900-

800

100o

$ 00

soo

400O

300

200

IOO

ChII

II ':"~II

'L

~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I

I~ ~ * t ~ ~ ~ ~

~J ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '4 ~ ~ ~ ~

C7l~ g)

~ ~

It

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~

D J F M A M J J A 5 0 N1988

Q GOA

GOAL REPRESENTSTHE FOLLOWINGREDUCTIONS FROM1-1-88 TOTALS:1983 —IOOX1984 -'0%1985 —BOA1986 —BOT1987 —807

ISSUE YEARK3 1983lZ3 1984K5 1985jC3 1986EZI 1987

L

This Month: Thirty-two items were closed during May,. whil'e the ma jority ofstation resources were devoted to resolution of incidnets and evolutions arisingfrom the Unit 2 refueling outage.

VISION PF EXCELLENCE

COMPANY AND

DEPARTMENT

OBJECTIVES

NUCLEAR

INDUSTRY

PERFORMANCE

EXTERNAL

INFLUENCES

DEVELOPMENT

OF FIVE YEAR GOALS

AND

STRATEGIC PLAN

NUCLEAR

DEPARTMENT

PERFORMANCE

NEAR-TERN

OPERATING

CONSTRAINTS

V.IS ION

OF

EXCELLENCE

DEVElOPMENT

OFNEAR-TERM'ERFORMANCE

OBJECTIVES

ANNUAL

PERFORMANCE

'BJECTIVES

INITIATIVES

THE WORK AND PLANNING CYCLE

1986 1987 1988 1989

UNIT 'ot. UNIT 2 1sT UNIT 1 3RD UNIT 2 2ND UNIT 1 4TH UNIT 2 3RD

OUTAGE CRITIQUE OUTAGE CRITIQU

TASKFORCE

PLANNINGCONFERENCE

SALP REPORT

PLANNINGCONFERENCE

PLANNINGCONfERENCE

SALP REPORT

PLANNINGCONFERENCE

INPO REPO T INPO REPORT

E IN IT I AT IVES AND NEW INITIATIVES AND

forwards comments to each specific salp category,per ... · ppcl/nrc meeting on health physics...

Documents