‘forging a nation’ - linda colley britons from 1707 both the creation of a strong and vibrant...
TRANSCRIPT
‘Forging a Nation’- Linda Colley Britons
From 1707 Both the creation of a strong and vibrant Nation-state
commercial opportunity (of Empire, in large part)
religious securityconstitutional freedoms
domestic securityfreedom from invasion
and, a shotgun marriage – defined by enforcement within
andagainst ‘other’
Union Flag of the United Kingdom
it became united, but not always (or ever) so
So what worked:
1. All nations are, in part, defined by what they are not
2. Specific context in early-modern eraincluded devising mechanisms of control
3. Revised role, and renewed popularity of the monarchy
4. Material change
Getting ‘forged’Regicide
1. between 1649 and 1660 England was a republic
2. never purely political: important religious dimensionsregional, factional differences in Englandbetween England, Scotland and Irelandbetween England and continental powers
Lord Protector and Head of State (1653-58)3. Oliver Cromwell – government by militarya conservative Calvinist
Restoration and Revolution
Charles II restored to laws of 1649• exclusion crisis of 1678-81• deathbed conversion• succeeded by his brother, James II
William and a New Order• 1688 landed in Devon• James fell apart; declared an abdication• William and Mary declared monarchs
• Glorious Revolution – peaceful (?)
But,in a constitutional monarchy
legislation is necessary, to create the laws by which the parliament, and the monarchy rule
* This is big *
It was about peaceBill of Rights of 1689 limited the sovereign’s power,
reaffirmed parliament’s right to tax and legislate Catholics excluded from monarchy
The Toleration Act of 1689 Protestant non-conformists freedom of worshipnot Catholics(who are non-Conformists? And why does it matter?)
1701 Act of Settlement to secure Protestant succession 1702 Queen AnnePrincess Sophia, Electress of Hanover George I
Crown ? less powerful than in 1649: fiscal resources strong civil service growing
Be suspicious of synthesis in history….Nothing was quiet, really:• arguments regarding the right to political
participation• religious divisions remained• ethnic/national tensions remained
• but other developments – money from growth in empire
material over theory?
Where does this leave the Acts of Union?
The ‘glorious’ revolution in Scotland
The response in 1698: ‘Jesus Christ is the only Head and
King of this church’ – General Assembly
Enduring Jacobism • Oath of Allegiance by 1691• ‘massacre at Glencoe’
Economic relations: the Darien Scheme
the Wine Actthe Act Anent Peace and WarAct of Security
‘this nation, being poor and without force to protect its commerce, cannot reap great advantage by it, till it partake of the trade and protection of some powerful neighbor nations’
English Alien Act (1705) – foreign nation with no right to trade with Britain
the trump
Settlement: one single parliament, 45 MPs Scots; 16 Lords
1/12 MPs [1::5 million citizens]
15 of 25 articles about tradefree trade for political independence
Y Deddfau Uno, 1535 a 1542
“the people of the same dominion have and do daily use a speche nothing like ne consonant to the naturall mother tonge used within this Realme” …. “utterly to extirpe alle and singular sinister usages and customs belonging to Wales.
and across the Irish Sea?
Trinity College Dublin est. 1592
‘Battle of the Boyne’ Wyck c.1693
How does ‘other’ define a nation?
In this ‘imagined community’: consisting of its own various ethnicities
Wars were of central importance: avoided major invasionavoided conscriptioncreated consensus
Paton, Sir Joseph Noel. In Memoriam. 1858
Continental Wars: with France who supported the StuartsSeven Years War supported American colonists after 1778colonial conflicts: N.A., south Asia, Africa,
MediterraneanNapoleonic Wars
(unattributed) 18C French print
Britain forged by:
the heat of economic power
pounded by a malet of military might when necessary
Cooled and hardened by culture, law and the desire for lasting peace