forensic aspects of evidence fingerprint identification “lifted” from steve gilbert, m.f.s.,...

60
Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D.

Upload: grayson-baine

Post on 01-Apr-2015

237 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Forensic Aspects of Evidence

Fingerprint Identification

“Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D.

Page 2: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

History of Fingerprints

• 1684 – Nehemiah Grew reported that various patterns were present in the fingers

• 1685 – Bidloo produced first fingerprint drawing• 1823 – Johannus Purkinje wrote a commentary of

the skin system• 1880 – Henry Faulds stated that chance prints at

scenes could identify perpetrator (Faulds)

Page 3: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

History of Fingerprints

• 1892 – Francis Galton wrote his book called “Fingerprints”. Studied over 40,000 prints and failed to find any matches

• 1901 – Sir Edward Henry established the first and continuing classification system

• 1902 – New York began collecting fingerprints of job applicants

Page 4: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

History of Fingerprints

• 1903 – West Brothers case in Kansas• 1904 – First fingerprint bureau• 1905 – US Army began fingerprinting soldiers• 1924 – FBI established FP system

Page 5: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Parts of the Hand

Proximal

Distal

UlnarRadial

Bracelet Crease

Proximal Traverse Crease

Thenar Eminence

I

II IIIIV

Inter Digital Pads I - IV

Hypo Thenar Eminence

Meta Carpal Crease

Distal Traverse Crease

Inter Digital Intervals

Page 6: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Embryology

• 6 weeks: pads II, III, IV• 8 weeks: finger elongate, separate• 8-12 weeks: pads round, separate pads• 13 weeks: pads regress smaller• 3-4 months: ridges form• The number ridges dictated by fullness of finger

pad

Page 7: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Pattern Anomalies

• Dissociation of Ridges – no ridges• Dysplasia – Faulty development of friction skin• Cuspal Patterns – ridges run distal to proximal

rather than side to side

Page 8: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Loops

One or more ridges enter on either side, recurve, touch or pass an imaginary line drawn from the delta to core, and terminate or tend to terminate on or toward the same side the ridge or ridges entered.

Loops opening towards the little finger is the ulnar loop, whereas the loop opening towards the thumb is the radial loop.

Page 9: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Ridge Counting

The number of ridges intervening between the delta and the core is known as the ridge count. (yellow tick marks)

Ridge count: 19

The line must touch the ridge to be counted.

Page 10: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Plain Arch

Ridges enter on one side and flow or tend to flow out the other side with a rise or wave in the center.

Page 11: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Tented Arch

Ridges enter on one side and flow or tend to flow out the other side, however the ridges in the center do not. This possesses an angle.

Page 12: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Tented Arch

Tented arch possessing the up-thrust.

Page 13: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Plain Whorls

The plain whorl has two deltas and at least one ridge making a complete circuit, which may be spiral, oval, circular, or any variant of a circle.

If an imaginary line drawn between both deltas crosses or touches a recurving ridge in the inner pattern area, the pattern is consider a plain whorl.

Page 14: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Central Pocket Loop

The central pocket loop has two deltas and at least one ridge which makes or tends to make a complete circuit. The circuit may be spiral, oval, circular or any variant of a circle. An imaginary line drawn between the two deltas must not touch or cross any recurving ridges within the inner pattern.

Page 15: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Double Loop

The double loop consists of two separate loop formations, with two separate and distinct sets of shoulders and two deltas.

Page 16: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Accidental

The accidental is a pattern consisting of a combination of two different types of patterns, with the exception of the plain arch, with two or more deltas; or a pattern which possesses some of the requirements for two or more different types; or a pattern which conforms to none of the definitions.

Page 17: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Major Parts of Prints

• Pattern area: appears in a loop or whorl in which appear the cores, deltas and ridges

• Core: approximate center of the print• Delta: that point on a ridge at or in front of and

nearest the center of the divergence of the type lines

Page 18: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Pattern Area

Page 19: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Core and Delta

Delta

Core

Page 20: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Fingerprint ClassificationHenry System

Key Major Primary Secondary Subsecondary final

20 M 1 U IOI 10

L 1 U IOI Sample classification

Page 21: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Primary Classification

• Primary: Values of whorlsFinger value assignments:Fingers 1 & 2: 16Fingers 3 & 4: 8Fingers 5 & 6: 4Fingers 7 & 8: 2Fingers 9 & 10: 1

• 1 is added to all primary classifications

• 1 over 1 indicates no whorls

• 32 over 32 indicates no whorls

Page 22: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Primary Classification

Even fingersOdd fingers

Where whorls appear in the fingers, the values are added, even over odd, with 1 added to the total.

In this card, the right hand has 16+8+4+1=29

The left hand:16+2+1=19

Page 23: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Secondary Classification

• Secondary: the pattern appearing in the index fingers

A ArchT Tented ArchR Radial LoopU Ulnar LoopW Whorl

Page 24: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Subsecondary Classification

• Subsecondary: grouping according to the ridge counts of loops and ridge tracings of whorls

Page 25: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Major Classification

• Major: Where whorls appear in the thumbs, the major division reflects whorl tracings (inner, outer, meeting)

• If loops appear in the thumbs, ridge counts are used

Page 26: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Major Classification Table

Left Thumb Denominator Right Thumb Numerator

01-11 Small………………………..[01-11, Small]

[12-16, Medium]

[17+, Large]

12-16 Medium…………………….. [01-11, Small]

[12-16, Medium]

[17+, Large]

17 or more, Large…………………..[01-17, Small]

[18-22, Medium]

[23+, Large]

Page 27: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Final Classification

• Final: ridge count of the right little finger.

*If not: ridge count in the left little finger*If not: a whorl is used * left delta to core (right hand) * right delta to core (left hand)

Page 28: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Key Classification

• Key: ridge count of the first loop appearing on the fingerprint card, exclusive of little fingers

Page 29: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Fingerprint Processing

• Powder and brush• Physical developer• Small particle developer• Ninhydrin• Cyanoacrylate• Iodine crystals

The following images depict laboratory practicums of the junior Fingerprints and Impressions class.

Page 30: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

Page 31: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

A camel hair brush is used to apply the fingerprint powder on suspect areas.

Page 32: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

Once a print is developed, excess powder is brushed away, leaving a visible print.

Page 33: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

Here, a hinge lifter is used to lift the developed print. Once applied, the print is preserved.

Page 34: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

Page 35: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

The lift needs to be one fluid motion.

Page 36: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Powder and Brush

Page 37: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Physical Developer

Documents can be washed with maleic acid and placed into the developer (yellow bath).

Page 38: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Physical Developer

Page 39: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Physical Developer

The sample should be agitated for 5 to 15 minutes, or removed at the best print.

Page 40: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Physical Developer

The physical developer produces a dark fingerprint when applied to latent prints.

Page 41: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Small Particle

Small particle reagent is sprayed on areas of suspected latent prints. Primarily used for wet surfaces, the reagent dries leaving behind a “powdered” fingerprint.

Page 42: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Ninhydrin

Ninhydrin is used on paper products. Purple fingerprints are developed after drying for 36 hours; or heat can be applied to quicker results.

Page 43: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Ninhydrin

A household hair dryer produces enough heat. Heat the sample approximately 2-3 minutes.

Page 44: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Ninhydrin

Ninhydrin developed latent fingerprints.

Page 45: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Cyanoacrylate Wand

The wand is heated by butane. The brass tip contains cyanoacrylate (super glue).

Page 46: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Cyanoacrylate

Cyanoacrylate, or “super glue”, hardens fingerprints into white crystalline prints. Vaporization occurs with heat and humidity.

Page 47: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

Iodine can be fumed at low temperatures. Once vaporous, it develops reddish-brown fingerprints.

Page 48: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

The specimen is placed into an air-tight container along with iodine crystals.

Page 49: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

Iodine is supplied in glass ampules.

Page 50: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

The air-tight container prevents the escape of iodine vapors.

Page 51: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

Heat from the hand is sufficient to vaporize the crystals. A hair dryer produces quicker results.

Page 52: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Iodine Crystals

An iodine fingerprint. Since iodine evaporates quickly, prints should be photographed.

Page 53: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Post Mortem Prints

Kits are available for collecting fingerprints from deceased persons.

Page 54: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Post Mortem Prints

Each finger is inked with the porelon pad.

Page 55: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Post Mortem Prints

The finger is then pressed into the concave scoop which holds the print card.

Page 56: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Post Mortem Prints

All deceased persons should be printed. Once buried or cremated, prints are no longer available.

Page 57: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Automated Technology

Computer programs can now match finger-prints. The latent print (left) is matched to the record print (right).

Page 58: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Record Fingerprints

Ten-print fingerprint card.

Page 59: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Major Case Prints

Major case prints represent all friction ridge surfaces of the fingers and palm.

Page 60: Forensic Aspects of Evidence Fingerprint Identification “Lifted” from Steve Gilbert, M.F.S., Ph.D

Major Case Prints

Right palm with both outer blades of the hand. Palms are rolled.