ford–fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological...

34
Lecture slides by Kevin Wayne Copyright © 2005 Pearson-Addison Wesley http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wayne/kleinberg-tardos Last updated on 4/17/18 9:07 AM 7. N ETWORK F LOW I Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological example

Upload: others

Post on 03-Jul-2020

8 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Lecture slides by Kevin WayneCopyright © 2005 Pearson-Addison Wesley

http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~wayne/kleinberg-tardos

Last updated on 4/17/18 9:07 AM

7. NETWORK FLOW I

‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo

‣ exponential-time example

‣ pathological example

Page 2: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

7. NETWORK FLOW I

‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo

‣ exponential-time example

‣ pathological example

SECTION 7.1

Page 3: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

3

s t

0 / 20 /

10 0 / 6

0 / 10

0 / 4

0 / 8

0 / 9

network G and flow f

0 / 10 0

value of flow

0 / 10

flow capacity

s t

2 6

10

4

9

residual network Gf

10

residual capacity

10 10 8

Page 4: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

4

2 6

4

9

residual network Gf

10

10

s t

0 / 20 /

10 0 / 6

0 / 10

0 / 4

0 / 8

0 / 9

network G and flow f

0 / 10 0

0 / 10

s t

10

10

8

8—

8—

8—

+ 8 = 8

Page 5: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

5

4residual network Gf

10

s t

0 / 28 /

10 0 / 6

8 / 10

0 / 4

8 / 8

0 / 9

network G and flow f

0 / 10 8

0 / 10

8

8

8

9s

22

—10 2 —

2— + 2 = 10

10 6

10—

2 t

Page 6: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

6

4residual network Gf

s t

2 / 210 /

100 / 6

10 / 10

0 / 4

8 / 8

2 / 9

network G and flow f

0 / 10 10

0 / 10

8

2

2

10

10

10 7s

10 6

t

6 —

8—

6— + 6 = 16

6—

Page 7: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

7

residual network Gf

s t

2 / 210 /

106 / 6

10 / 10

0 / 4

8 / 8

8 / 9

network G and flow f

6 / 10 16

6 / 10

8

8

10

10

1

6

6

6

4

4s

4

t

2

8—

0 —

2—

8—

+ 2 = 18

fixes mistake from second augmenting path

Page 8: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

8

residual network Gf

s t

0 / 210 /

106 / 6

10 / 10

2 / 4

8 / 8

8 / 9

network G and flow f

8 / 10 18

8 / 10

8

10

10 6

8

2

2

8

1

2

s

2

t2

8

9—

9—

7—

3—

9—

+ 1 = 19

Page 9: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm demo

9

residual network Gf

s t

0 / 210 /

106 / 6

10 / 10

3 / 4

7 / 8

9 / 9

network G and flow f

9 / 10 19

9 / 10

10

10 6

9

2

3

9

9

1

s

1

t1

7

1

nodes reachable from s

min cutvalue of max flow

capacity = 10 + 9 = 19

Page 10: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

7. NETWORK FLOW I

‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo

‣ exponential-time example

‣ pathological example

SECTION 7.1

Page 11: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

11

v w

t

s

0

1

00

0capacity

flow

100

100

100

100

0

initialize with 0 flow

Page 12: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

12

0

00

1

0

0

1st augmenting path

1

1

1

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 13: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

13

1

1

1

2nd augmenting path

0

0

1

1

1

0

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 14: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

14

1

11

1

1

0

3rd augmenting path

2

2

1

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 15: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

15

2

2

1

4th augmenting path

1

1

1

2

2

0

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 16: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

16

. . .

Page 17: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

17

99

1

99

0

199th augmenting path

100

100

1

99

99

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 18: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

18

100

100

1

200th augmenting path

99

99

1

100

100

0

100

100

100

100

t

s

v w

Page 19: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: exponential-time example

Bad news. Number of augmenting paths can be exponential in input size.

19

0

100

100

1

100

100

100

10010

0

100

t

s

v w

Page 20: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

7. NETWORK FLOW I

‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo

‣ exponential-time example

‣ pathological example

SECTION 7.1

Page 21: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

Intuition. Let r > 0 satisfy r2 = 1 – r.

・Initially, some residual capacities are 1 and r.

・After two augmenting paths, some residual capacities are r and r2.

・After two more augmenting paths, some residual capacities are r2 and r3.

・After two more, some residual capacities are r3 and r4.

・By carefully choreographing the augmenting paths,infinitely many residual capacities arise!

21

1 – r

r – r2

r2 – r3

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

r � 0.618 =� r4 < r3 < r2 < r < 1

Page 22: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

22

v

u

w

xs 0 / C

0 / C 0 / r

0 / 1

0 / 1

t

0 / C

0 / C

0 / C

0 / Cw

x

v

us

t

C sufficiently large that it won’t ever be a bottleneck (we'll suppress)

flow network G

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 23: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

23

v

u

w

xs

0 / r

augmenting path 1: s→w→v→t (bottleneck capacity = 1)

0 / 1

t

w

x

v

us

t

0 / 1—

1

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 24: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

24

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 2: s→u→v→w→x→t (bottleneck capacity = r)

t

w

x

v

us

t

0 / r

0 / 1

1 / 1—

1 – r

—r = 1

– r2

—r

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 25: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

25

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 3: s→w→v→u→t (bottleneck capacity = r)

t

w

x

v

us

t

r / r

1 – r

2 / 1

1 – r / 1

1

0

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 26: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

26

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 4: s→u→v→w→x→t (bottleneck capacity = r2)

t

w

x

v

us

t

0 / r

1 / 1—

1 – r2

—r2 =

r – r3

1 – r

2 / 1

1

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 27: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

27

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 5: s→x→w→v→t (bottleneck capacity = r2)

t

w

x

v

us

t

1 / 1

1 – r2 / 1

—1 – r

2

1

r – r3 /

r

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 28: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

28

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 6: s→u→v→w→x→t (bottleneck capacity = r3)

t

w

x

v

us

t

1 – r

2 / 1

1 / 1—

1 – r3

1 – r

2 + r3 =

1 –

r4

r – r3 /

rr

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 29: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

29

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 7: s→w→v→u→t (bottleneck capacity = r3)

t

w

x

v

us

t

r / r

1 – r3 / 1

1

—r –

r3

1 – r

4 / 1

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 30: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

30

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 8: s→u→v→w→x→t (bottleneck capacity = r4)

t

w

x

v

us

t

r – r3 /

r

1 / 1—

1 – r4

1

1 – r

4 / 1

r – r3 +

r4 =

r –

r5

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 31: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

31

v

u

w

xs

augmenting path 9: s→x→w→v→t (bottleneck capacity = r4)

t

w

x

v

us

t

1 / 1

—1

– r4

1

1 – r4 / 1

r – r5 /

r

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 32: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

32

v

u

w

xs

flow after augmenting path 5: { r - r3, 1, 1 - r2 } (value of flow = 1 + 2r + 2r2)

t

w

x

v

us

t

1 / 1

flow after augmenting path 1: { r - r1, 1, 1 - r0 } (value of flow = 1)

1 – r

4 / 1

r – r5 /

r

flow after augmenting path 9: { r - r5, 1, 1 - r4 } (value of flow = 1 + 2r + 2r2 + 2r3 + 2r4)

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

Page 33: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Ford–Fulkerson algorithm: pathological example

Theorem. The Ford–Fulkerson algorithm may not terminate; moreover, it

may converge to a value not equal to the value of the maximum flow.

Pf.

・After (1 + 4k) augmenting paths of the form just described,the value of the flow

・Value of maximum flow = 2C + 1. ▪

33

= 1 + 22k�i=1

ri

� 1 + 2��

i=1ri

= 3 + 2r

< 5

= 1 + 22k�i=1

ri

� 1 + 2��

i=1ri

= 3 + 2r

< 5

= 1 + 22k�i=1

ri

� 1 + 2��

i=1ri

= 3 + 2r

< 5

r =

�5 � 1

2=� r2 = 1 � r

= 1 + 22k�i=1

ri

� 1 + 2��

i=1ri

= 1 +2r

1 � r

= 3 + 2r

< 5<latexit sha1_base64="jYbj/lj4jSjHk8u6NuvwVdAASIE=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="jYbj/lj4jSjHk8u6NuvwVdAASIE=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="jYbj/lj4jSjHk8u6NuvwVdAASIE=">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</latexit><latexit sha1_base64="jYbj/lj4jSjHk8u6NuvwVdAASIE=">AAAC+nicbVFNb9QwEHXCVwkf3ZYjF4sVCAmxihdKe6BSJS4ci8S2ldbpynEmW2ttJ7Id1Cjkz3BDXPkhXPk3OGmEutuONNbTm3kz9nNaSmFdHP8Nwjt3791/sPUwevT4ydPt0c7uiS0qw2HGC1mYs5RZkELDzAkn4aw0wFQq4TRdferqp9/AWFHor64uIVFsqUUuOHOeWoz+0BSWQjfMGFa3jeSyjfArfOiT4Dd4iqmtFJVCCWcXjTgk7XkzXbXYnAtK52SyByrpBFSCP2/V+GGdigqdu7pX4jXp/2U0yw3jzdS0DXlr2r7res+7brjp6Mn+wH/0uRdR0NnwgmgxGseTuA98E5ABjNEQx4udYJdmBa8UaMcls3ZO4tIlfp4TXEIb0cpCyfiKLWHuoWYKbNL01rf4pWcynBfGp3a4Z68rGqasrVXqOxVzF3az1pG31eaVyw+SRuiycqD51aK8ktgVuPtHnAkD3MnaA8aN8HfF/IJ5/5z/7bUt/ewS+NpLmstKC15ksMFKd+kMa72LZNOzm+BkOiHxhHx5Pz46GPzcQs/RC/QaEbSPjtBndIxmiAcfAhpAkIffwx/hz/DXVWsYDJpnaC3C3/8A/wXkvg==</latexit>

Page 34: Ford–Fulkerson demo exponential-time example pathological ...wayne/kleinberg-tardos/pdf/07DemoF… · ‣ Ford–Fulkerson demo ‣ exponential-time example ‣ pathological example

Reference

34

ELSEVIER Theoretical Computer Science 148 ( 1995) 165-I 70

Theoretical Computer Science

Note The smallest networks on which the Ford-Fulkerson

maximum flow procedure may fail to terminate

Uri Zwick’ Department of Computer Science. Tel Aviv University, Rnmat Ah. 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel

Received November I993 Communicated by M. Nivat

Abstract

It is widely known that the Ford-Fulkerson procedure for finding the maximum flow in a network need not terminate if some of the capacities of the network are irrational. Ford and Fulkerson gave as an example a network with 10 vertices and 48 edges on which their procedure may fail to halt. We construct much smaller and simpler networks on which the same may happen. Our smallest network has only 6 vertices and 8 edges. We show that it is the smallest example possible.

1. Introduction

The maximal flow problem is one of the most fundamental combinatorial optimiza- tion problems. The Ford-Fulkerson augmenting paths procedure is perhaps the most basic method devised for solving it and many more advanced algorithms are based on it.

Ford and Fulkerson themselves point out that their procedure need not terminate if the network it is applied on has some irrational capacities. In their book [3], they describe a network with 10 vertices and 48 edges on which this may happen. Their network is quite complicated and most textbooks (see, e.g., [ 1,2,4-6,8]) that describe their procedure do not present it. A variant of their example appears in [7], it has 14 vertices and 28 edges. We are not aware of any simpler example that had appeared in the literature.

In this note we describe three much smaller and simpler networks, on which the Ford-Fulkerson procedure may fail to terminate. The first two networks contain only 6 vertices and 9 edges each. The third network is yet smaller containing only 6 vertices and 8 edges. All three networks are acyclic and planar. The first two are planar and

* Email: [email protected].

0304-3975/95/$09.50 @ 1995 -EElsevier Science B V. All rights reserved SSDI 0304-3975(95)00022-4