for proposed 42’’ crude oil pipeline project from … · executive summary- cpcl pipeline...

SUBMISSION OF EXECUTIVE SUMMARYFOR PUBLIC HEARING

FOR

PROPOSED 42’’ CRUDE OIL PIPELINEPROJECT FROM CHENNAI PORT TO

CPCL MANALI

SUBMITTED BY

CHENNAI PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLIMITED

Prepared by

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT

HUBERT ENVIRO CARE SYSTEMS (P) LTD

CHENNAI-600083

June 2012

Executive Summary- CPCL Pipeline Project

E - 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. INTRODUCTION

Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited, formerly known as MRL (Madras Refineries

Limited); is one of the largest and most integrated refineries in south India producing fuel

products, lubricants & additives.

CPCL's product range is wide and varied; providing fuel like Diesel, Kerosene, LPG, ATF and

Bitumen. CPCL also provides high quality feedstock's for other industries like Propylene,

Superior Kerosene, Butylenes, Naphtha, Paraffin Wax and Sulphur.

1.1. MANALI REFINERY

The Manali refinery was originally designed for processing 2.5 MMTPA (Million Metric

Tonnes per Annum) of Darius Crude from Iran. The construction of the refinery was

completed in a record time of 27 months, at a cost of Rs.43 crore. It was constructed

without any cost or time overrun. The refinery was commissioned in the year 1969 and has

consistently been making profits from the second year of operations, and paying dividends

from the third year.

The capacity of CPCL's Manali refinery was increased from 2.5 MMTPA to 2.8 MMTPA in

1980, through de-bottlenecking steps. Subsequently, the refining capacity was doubled to

5.6 MMTPA in 1984-85 at a cost of Rs.170 crore. Amoco Inc. disinvested its equity holding

in favour of the GoI in 1985. In March 1993, the overall refining capacity at Manali was

enhanced further to 6.5 MMTPA. The company has commissioned most part of the 3

MMTPA refinery expansion cum modernization project in March 2004. Presently Refining

capacity of Manali Refinery stands at 10.5 MMTPA.

1.2. NEED FOR THE PROJECT

Presently CPCL receives its crude oil from oil tankers berthed at Chennai Port Trust

through a 30” pipeline commissioned in 1969. In 1996, Engineers India Limited (EIL) had

done a study on the operational health of this existing 30” crude oil pipeline from Chennai

Port Trust to its Manali refinery. The study by M/s. EIL in 2008, in had indicated that

there is no significant corrosion damage on the external surface of the pipeline. Considering


E - 2

the densly populated Built up area through which the pipeline passes, the presence of busy

railway line in close vicinity and finally extreme difficulty in taking up repairs or corrective

maintenance in the event of any failure, EIL has advised that pipeline be rerouted having

ROU/ROW.

1.3. PROPOSED PIPELINE CONVEYING SYSTEM

To meet the requirements of the Manali Refinery and considering the recommendation of

EIL, a new 42” crude oil pipeline is proposed to be laid from Chennai Port to Manali

Refinery along the route of the proposed Port Connectivity Project. The detailed route

alignment survey has been completed; soil geo-tech studies and other pre-project activities

are carried out. CPCL is closely co-ordinating with Chennai Port Trust, Tamilnadu Road

Development Corporation, Indian Oil Corporation (Pipelines Division) and other agencies

for this project. The new pipeline is expected to be laid within 12 months of obtaining right

of way. The indicative project cost is about Rs.126 crores.

In order to augment this Scenario, M/S. Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited (CPCL) has

appointed M/S. Hubert Enviro Care Systems Pvt Ltd (HECS), Chennai to assess the likely

impacts arising out of proposed project activities and to prepare an Environmental Impact

Assessment & Management plan report for their proposed program. The study was

completed earlier in the year 2005, and on the submission of the same to the Ministry,

CPCL was directed to update the EIA incorporating the present baseline data via their letter

dated 7th August, 2008. One season (post monsoon) baseline data was collected during the

months of January to March 2009, and the EIA report was updated based on the collected

primary and secondary data. It was advised by the State CRZ committee to conduct studies

on PM 2.5 and PM 10 levels prescribed by Govt. of India (through recent Gazette

notification on national Ambient Air Quality Standards dated 18th November 2009). One

season (Pre monsoon) baseline data was collected during the months of April to June 2010,

and the EIA report was updated based on the collected primary and secondary data.

1.4. OBJECTIVE AND NEED FOR EIA

The proposed project attracts EIA, as per CRZ Notification 1991/2011. The distinct features

of the methodology for the EMP project were as follows,


E - 3

1. The existing environmental quality was assessed based on primary and secondary data.

Wherever data was not available to make fair assessment, actual monitoring in the field

was carried out.

2. Potential sources of pollution were identified and anticipated pollution was quantified.

3. Potential environmental impacts including potential benefits were identified and

assessed.

4. An EMP, comprising proposed environmental management strategies and appropriate

further enhancements recommended by HECS, was formulated to maintain and

enhance the environmental quality around the project site.

Keeping in view the nature of activities envisaged, size of the project and the various

environmental guidelines available, it was decided to cover an area of 10 km radius from

the center of the proposed unit for the purpose of Environmental Management Studies

(EMS).

2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT

The proposed pipeline is envisaged for importation and transportation of crude oil

from Chennai Port Trust to CPCL, Manali.

a. The pipeline system has been designed so as to optimally transport crude oil using

API 1102, API 1104, and ASME 31.4 from Chennai Port to CPCL, Manali.

b. The pipeline will encounter number of roads, railway crossings and a canal. All the

roads and railway tracks will be crossed by cased crossing method. Canal will be

crossed by submerged crossing method.

c. Chennai Port Trust would prevail upon the SPV for CPCL to get the ROW for laying

new crude oil pipeline (approx 42” dia) along the beam of a portion of the proposed

Port Connectivity Project i.e. from Oil Jetty at Chennai Port Trust to CPCL’s R & D

Centre.

d. In order to mitigate the corrosion of the pipeline, impressed current cathodic

protection (CP) system will be provided.


E - 4

2.2. PROJECT LOCATION

The proposed pipeline will originate from Chennai Port Trust and terminate at CPCL,

Manali which is about approximately 16.8 KM from Chennai Port Trust. The study area

covers 10 km radius aerially. The pipeline traverses mostly through flat terrain near

the coastal zone. The pipeline encounters railways, National Highways and a canal. The

pipeline route alignment map is given Figure 2.1 and the study area maps of pipeline

shown in Figure 2.2

2.3. PIPELINE ROUTE SELECTION

For establishing the pipeline route, various possible alternatives were identified based

on study of Survey of India topographic maps followed by ground survey. Data /

information were collected on parameters having significant impact on the selection of

the most favorable route viz.

a) ROU Length

b) Land use pattern

c) Nature of Terrain

d) Number and type of crossings.


E - 5

Figure 2.1 Pipeline Route Alignment Map

Figure 2.2 Study Area Map of Pipeline


E - 6

Figure 2-3 Satellite Image of Existing and Proposed Pipeline Route

2.4. SALIENT FEATURES OF THE PROJECT

Name of the Project Proposed 42” Crude Oil PipelineProject Proponent Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited

Location Laying of 42” Crude Oil Pipeline from ChennaiPort to CPCL.

Total Length of the Pipeline 16.8 Kms

Nearest Railway stationTiruvotriyur (1.75 Km East)Chennai Central (8.10 kms South)Egmore (9.15 kms South West)

Nearest Airport Chennai Airport at 23 km in South West direction

Nearest Sea port Chennai Port (3.70 Km in East)Nearest Highway SH104 (Connecting Minjur to Chennai Central)Industries around the site TPL, MPL, Futura Polyesters etc.


E - 7

2.5. PIPELINE DESIGN BASIS AND SPECIFICATIONS

The pipeline system has been designed on the basis of transportation of crude oil. The

design capacity of the system for the proposed branch from Chennai Port Trust to

Manali refinery will be 10.5 MMTPA.

The proposed pipeline will be designed and constructed in accordance with ANSI

B31.4 code for liquid petroleum transportation piping system, Oil Industry Safety

Directorate (OISD) 138 & 141, International Safety Codes and the Indian Petroleum

Act. Requirements of American Petroleum Institute (API) codes 1102 and 1104 will

also be met for layout of the pipeline.

Level indicating instruments will be installed along the pipeline route for safe

operation of the pipeline.

The pipeline would be buried 1.5 m except at critical location such as river or

NH/railway crossings where the depth will be more depending upon the design factors

and statutory requirements. The depth of burial would be as per the following OISD

norms.

Table: 2.1 Minimum Cover for Burries Pipelines

S. No Location Minimum Cover (m)1 Industrial, Commercial and Residential

Areas1.5

2 Areas near habitations 10 HDD (HorizontalDirectional Drilling)

2 Stream, Canal and other minor watercrossings

1.5

3 Drainage ditches at roadways and railroads 1.0

4 Rocky Areas 1.05 Uncased / Cased Road Crossings 1.26 Railroad Crossings 1.47 Other Areas 1.0


E - 8

Table: 2.2 Pipeline Alignment

Length of thePipeline

Village Taluk District State

0 – 3.3 km Chennai Tondaiyarpet Chennai Tamil Nadu

3.3 – 7.6 km Thiruvottiyur Ambattur Tiruvallur Tamil Nadu

7.6 – 11.5 km Ernavur Ambattur Tiruvallur Tamil Nadu

11.5 – 15 km Sathankadu Village Ambattur Tiruvallur Tamil Nadu

2.6. POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM

The power supply for the terminal at port trust 450V. Three phase power supply will

be provided by Chennai Port Trust.

2.7. CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM

In order to mitigate external corrosion of the pipeline, Impressed Cathodic Protection

(CP) system will be provided. The system envisages impressed current anodes,

equipped with a cathodic protection unit having uninterrupted power supply

arrangement.

2.8. PROJECT ACTIVITIES

2.8.1. Construction phase

Land acquisition - Land required for laying the pipeline will be

acquired all along the ROW of the pipeline route.

Staking - Before starting the construction phase, benchmarks,

intersection points, and other survey monuments will be installed.

Delineation and Site Clearing - Site clearing will involve removal of

all vegetation and debris from the pipeline route.

Grading of ROW - Grading involves various activities related to the

leveling of ground surface to facilitate the movement of equipment

and machinery.


E - 9

Trenching - The depth of trenching will vary depending on

topography and the type of obstruction. In no case the clear cover will

be less than 1m from the top of the pipeline crown.

Welding of joints - Sections of pre-fabricated pipeline will be stacked

at various locations along the pipeline trench, known as stringing.

Followed by stringing, the pipeline sections are cleaned internally and

welded together.

Protective Coating - Pipeline will be protected with medium –

density polyethylene or coal tar enamel. Pipeline joints will be

covered with satisfactory shrinkable sleeves.

Pipeline Laying -The pipes will be lifted by the tractors in a correct

position and uniformly distributed along the ROW. After laying the

pipeline, excavated earth will be placed over the pipeline.

Clean – up and Restoration of ROW Strip - After completing the

laying of pipeline, the ROW strip will be cleaned by removing all the

debris, construction materials and other refuse.

Hydro testing - After the pipeline is laid and buried, the pipeline will

be subjected to hydro testing in order to test the pressure at certain

sections. The entire section of the pipeline is loaded with water and

internally subjected to high pressure to ensure that the pipe can

withstand specific design pressure

2.8.2. Operational Phase

During the commissioning of the pipeline, dehydration will be carried out. The

entire system check will be carried out. The major pipeline alignment, length of

the pipeline and crossing details are as follows:


E - 10

Table: 2.3 Length of the Pipeline

S. No. Intersection Number Total Length(kms)

Above/Belowintersection

Vertical Clearance(metres) minimum

1 Roads 2 0.045 Pipeline is belowthe intersection

1.25

2 Railway Lines 2 0.03 Pipeline is belowthe intersection

1.70

3 Sewage Mains 1 0.010 Pipeline is abovethe intersection

1.0

4 Canal 1 0.040 Pipeline is belowthe intersection

1.5

Table 2-4 Details of Crossing

S.No.

Intersection Stretch MaximumWidth (meters)

Minimum Width(metres)

Minimum cover1 Road Crossings – 2 8.170 km

13.910 km6030

3510

2 Railway Crossings – 2Nos.

9.10 km13.195 km

6020

2010

2.9. PROJECT COST & PERIOD OF COMPLETION

The total project cost for laying pipeline from Chennai Port Trust to CPCL, Manali is

estimated to be Rs.126 crores. The project is estimated to be completed within 12

months from the date of obtaining CRZ clearance.

3. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL SCENARIO

3.1. LAND USE STUDIES

The land use of the study area is obtained from the available data such as District

Primary Census Handbook of Thiruvallur districts for the year 2001.

The land use pattern of the pipeline study area does not cover any forest, ecologically

sensitive area. Agricultural land covers 0.21%, Notified Industrial area -3.43%, fallow

land 1.08%, sand dunes- 4.7%, intertidal zone 0.09%, urban areas – 47.13%, water

body- 0.15%, sea- 43.17%, flood plains-0.04%.


E - 11

3.2. MONITORING LOCATIONS

Six locations were selected for sample collection along the proposed pipeline

alignment covering the areas of activities as given in Table 3-1. The map is given in

Figure 3-1.

Figure 3-1 Monitoring Locations Map

Table 3-1 Monitoring Locations

StationCode

Name of the Station Distance withrespect to CPCL

Zone Location

1 CPCL (ETP IInd gatetank No.108 area)

0 Industrial Core Zone

2 Sadayan kuppam 3km (north) Commercial Buffer Zone3 Manali town 4.5 km (west) Industrial Buffer Zone4 Ramakrishna Nagar 4.5 km (east) Industrial Buffer Zone5 Tiruvottiyur 4.5 km (south

east)Industrial

cumResidential

Buffer Zone

6 Madavaram 8 km(south west) Industrial Buffer Zone


E - 12

3.3. MICROMETEOROLOGY

The observed temperature range in the area varied from 25°C to 34°C. The relative

humidity normally varied between 49-79%, while the wind speed, ranged from 1.5 to

12.4 m/s. The direction of wind in majority of observation time was from Southwest to

Northeast.

3.4. AIR QUALITY

Six locations were selected for the air quality study with respect to Oxides of Sulphur

(SOX), Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX), Respirable particulate Matter (RPM), and Suspended

Particulate Matter (SPM). Later PM 10 & PM 2.5 levels were also monitored from April

to June 2010. The results are given in Table 3-2. All the Ambient Air quality monitoring

results are within the category of commercial and industrial zone. In all the location

the observed values are within the prescribed limits of NAAQS.

Table 3-2 Summary of Ambient Air Quality Results

S.No

Parameters 1 2 3 4 5 6 Standardsg / m3)

1 SPM 173 127 165 104 112 154 5002 RPM 115 85 93 78 75 96 1503 SOx 14.4 10.8 12 8.6 10.2 9.8 1204 NOx 29.5 13.6 13.9 11.2 9.9 13.8 1205 CO <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 10 mg/ m3

6 HC BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL BDL -7 PM 2.5* 49 46 52 50 48 49 60

8 PM 10 * 84 84 90 89 86 79 100

* PM 10 & PM 2.5 were monitored during April – June 2010.

3.5. WATER QUALITY

To monitor the water quality, six samples were collected from locations mentioned in

Table 3-1, for water quality testing. The results reveal that the electrical conductivity

ranges from 1362- 4310 Micromhos/cm and TDS from 790-2500 mg/L and are in

higher range. The nitrates range from 5-10mg/L. Chlorides range from 41-96 mg/L,

silica range was observed between 9-12 mg/L.


E - 13

3.6. NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT

Six locations were selected for noise monitoring. The noise levels were found

conforming to the commercial and industrial zone requirements as per standards of

TNPCB / CPCB for different zones in daytime and night time. The results are given in

Table 3-3.

Table 3-3 Ambient Noise Quality

Station Code Day Night Noise StandardsdB (A) eq

Day Time Night Time1 62.3 56.4 75 702 50.1 34.1 65 553 70.0 48.7 75 704 56.5 41.6 75 705 70.5 49.0 75 706 71.7 49.8 75 70

3.7. SOIL QUALITY

To access the soil quality, samples were collected at six locations as mentioned in Table

3-1. At the selected sites, soil samples were collected using Auger/core cutter into the

soil at a depth of 90 cm. The soil texture was brownish sand. pH of 10% solution varied

from 6.63 to 6.98. The infiltration rate varied from 15.3 – 16.6. The organic content

were in the range of 2.02- 2.12%., available nitrogen was observed in the range of 0.4-

0.48%, phosphorus 0.24- 0.32% and potassium 0.2-0.3%

3.8. SOCIO ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT

Predominantly the socio economic is typical urbanized mixed industrial community

with typical below average social indicators. The amenities like drinking water supply,

power supply, and medical facilities are available within the study area.

3.9. ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES

The core zone area is devoid of endangered species while the buffer zone contains

private agricultural lands and wastelands. The buffer zone area contains common

varieties of flora, but no endangered species. The biotic data indicates normal arid


E - 14

conditions and absence of any special or endangered species. Also the tourist spot or

any historical monuments or forest reserves are not present.

4. IMPACT PREDICTION

For proper assessment of impact it becomes essential to understand various activities

which may result in environmental pollution during construction and operation of the

proposed pipeline. The Study of Impact is necessary to identify and assess various

environmental impacts caused on the existing environs by the proposed scheme, with a

view to arrive at an objective assessment of the possible harmful fall-outs and to plan

necessary corrective and remedial measures well in advance to contain these within the

prescribed limits set by Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) and Tamil Nadu

Pollution Control Board (TNPCB).

4.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Dust generated during excavation of pipeline in the ROW may affect

communities in the immediate vicinity of construction sites

As the pipeline is not crossing any surface water bodies and only crosses

navigational canal viz. Buckingham canal, no impact is envisaged on the

surface water body along the pipeline alignment during the operational

phase.

As evident during construction phase, the excavation, laying and other

works will create noise sources.

4.2. OPERATION PHASE

Spillage is possible in case of pipeline failure. However adequate safety

measures are built in to prevent spillage and contain any damage.

4.3. IMPACT ON COASTAL REGULATION ZONE (CRZ)

Proposed pipeline alignment will fall within 500 m from the tidal area and as per the

CRZ notification 2011, the stretch of the project alongside the Bay of Bengal comes

under the category of Classification II (CRZ II), which means the areas that have


E - 15

already been developed up to or close to the shoreline. Hence the proposed project

comes under CRZ II.

4.4. PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES

To safeguard the pipeline and facilities routine activities, there will be

some restriction on the land use within the ROW strip. No permanent

structure and deep-rooted trees will be allowed.

Distinctly colored stake markers will be placed on both sides of the ROW

at a regular interval of every 10m.

Corner stones will be laid to demarcate the pipeline route in the ROW.

The quality of welds will be done by the radio-graphical examination with

the help of X-ray / Gamma radiation.

The entire pipeline will be subjected to “Holiday Testing” for checking the

soundness of coating. Any damages, coating defects can be detected by

holiday testing.

Leak detection system in the pipeline is proposed, so as to immediately

identify the leakage;

Remote Control Valves would be provided for stoppage of pipeline

operation and isolation.

Regular patrolling of the pipeline is proposed.

Cathode protection is proposed to prevent corrosion.

Adequate temporary canopies and sprinkling of water on surface areas

alongside the construction works would be done. These measures would

control the dust pollutions.

Protective measures like earplug / ear muffs will be provided in high

level of noise generating areas and this would mitigate impacts on

construction workers.


E - 16

5. RISK ASSESSMENT

Risk assessment is a tool to help in the analysis of the risk posed by the different

project activities to the surrounding population and also quantification of the same.

The objectives of the risk assessment are

Assessing risk levels due to the operations

Identification of the risk mitigation measures to bring the potential risk within

acceptable range

To suggest general safety improvement measures for the facility.

To help generate accident free hours that in turn increase production

To identify emergency scenarios and suggest mitigation measures.

5.1. HAZARD IDENTIFICATION

This is a tool that is very useful for conducting a risk assessment as it helps in

identification and detailing of hazards that exist in a given project. Crude oil is a

naturally occurring flammable liquid consisting of a complex mixture

of hydrocarbons of various molecular weights and other liquid organic

compounds. On release of crude oil jet fire, flash fire and vapour cloud explosion

may occur.

5.2. RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

The important risk mitigation measures for pipeline system are given below:

Buried crude oil pipelines in same ROW should be provided with suitable

coating, wrapping and cathodic protection system for corrosion

prevention.

SCADA system should be installed to monitor pipelines during operation.

Pipeline should be pressure tested at 1.5 times the maximum pressure

once in a year. Test pressure should be held at least for 24 hours:


E - 17

Ground patrolling by walking in ROW should be done regularly by

personal survey to reduce chances of sabotage of pipeline and

encroachment of ROW.

Communication system should be properly tested before commencing

pipeline operation.

Periodic intelligent pigging and pipe-to-soil potential survey should be

carried out in accordance with codes and best industry practice to

monitor pipeline health.

Pig launching and receiving facilities provided at the beginning and end of

each pipeline should be suitable for intelligent pigging.

All welds in the pipelines should be radio graphed.

Pipeline marker signs should be placed in ROW and especially where

pipeline crosses highway and water body.

6. DISASTER MANAGEMENT PLAN

Due to the large volumes of flammable fluids formed on liquid spillage, the emergency

scenarios envisaged require initial action to stop the transfer operation in a quick, safe

and controlled manner.

6.1. ONSITE EMERGENCY PLAN

Sirens shall be issued for announcing emergency as indicated in the on-site plan. The

Main Controller shall do the declaration and termination of the on-site emergency in

consultation with the incident controller. For proper operation the following will be

provided

Emergency Control Centre

Proper communication system

Protective equipments

Co -ordination between key personnel during emergency


E - 18

6.2. OFF SITE EMERGENCY PLAN

Off-site emergencies arise due to accidents which could affect the people and the

environment outside facility stretch. In this case, it will be necessary to involve outside

agencies. People living within the accident-prone zone, should be evacuated from the

area.

6.3. FIRE PROTECTION ARRANGEMENT

CPCL will arrange the protection system during emergencies which include:

Fire Detection System

Fire Communication System

Fire Protection System

6.4. TRAINING FOR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Training shall be provided to all personnel who have a role in the planning and

operational response to the emergency. Training should be provided to;

All site personnel

Medical personnel and public fire service personnel

The employee’s family staying in the quarters and nearby schools and

villages within 5 Km range. (awareness program)

Emergency scenarios shall be developed to test emergency plans and operational

response at all levels.

6.5. SAFETY PLAN

During construction, safety is an important factor for all personnel working at the site.

During excavation and erection of proposed facility, the project authority shall

formulate safety policy with the following regulations:

To provide necessary equipment, safety appliances and to ensure their

proper use.


E - 19

To ensure that all safety factors are taken into account in the design,

construction, operation and erection machinery and equipment

To provide training in fire fighting operations

To notify regulations, instructions and notices in the common language of

employees

To prepare safety rules for the employees as per the safety policy

To allocate sufficient resources to maintain safe and healthy conditions of

work

7. ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

7.1. CONSTRUCTION PHASE

The preparation of site involves initial topographical mapping of the site.

Accordingly the layout is prepared so that the minimum of the leveling is

required. This will help in reducing the land preparation and minimum

excavation to be done.

The excavated mud shall be used for leveling the ground.

Water spraying can be done for suppressing the dust.

Adequate construction space shall be made available for the storage of

the materials of various contractors and for them to carry out pre-

fabrication work. Specific areas to be identified at the time of start of the

site activities;

Minimum vegetation clearance and stock pile vegetation on the right of

way (ROW);

Restoring all areas affected by the establishment of the line both within

and adjacent to the ROW;

Compaction and stabilization should be restored to during back filling to

ensure that no top soil is washed away;


E - 20

Workers would be provided earplugs, safety shoes and goggles as

protective devices during construction.

7.2. OPERATION PHASE

The pipeline design will strictly follow the protocols laid down by the

OISD.

Thickness of soil cover will be decided and also keeping in view the land

use pattern along the alignment as well as population distribution. This

will ensure the safety of the population

The pipeline would be subjected to quality control through pressure

testing during construction and operational phase. The pipeline would be

monitored and controlled from Station Control Center (SCC).

Warning signs will be placed at road crossings and other appropriate

locations as required.

Temporary traffic control will be established where necessary at road

crossings and junctions.

To monitor status of the pipeline with respect to corrosion / erosion,

intelligent pig will be used.

Development of a green belt in and around the pipeline area is an

effective way to check pollutants and their dispersion into the

surrounding areas.

Impressed current based cathodic protection system will be provided in

order to mitigate external corrosion of the main lines.

Corrosion inhibitor chemical will be injected in the pipeline during its

operation to prevent internal corrosion.

To monitor the extent of environmental impact of the proposed project,

periodical monitoring of pollutant loads generated from the pipeline will

be done.


E - 21

An environmental management cell (EMC) will be looking after all the

environment-related activities in the pipeline route.

Training shall be provided to all personnel for promoting awareness

among the employees with respect to emergency scenarios.

Identifying and evaluating the environmental impacts caused during

emergency situations.

8. PROJECT BENEFITS

The proposed pipeline project will be beneficial for the environment. The project will

result in the following benefits:

Pipeline transport is more eco-friendly than rail / road. Due to the pipeline project,

the level of pollution would be reduced compared to road / rail transport, the

pollution level would be more.

The cost of the pipeline is less as compared to the cost augmenting road and rail

transport. The operational cost of the pipeline is less than the cost of transporting

fuel by trucks and tank wagons.

Transportation problems associated rail movement such as non-availability of

wagons; spillage losses and derailment delays would be eliminated.

Pipeline transportation reduces the fuel required for transporting products by road

and rail, and also reduces handling and transport losses.

The pipeline would bring about savings in Capital as well as recurring costs.

for proposed 42’’ crude oil pipeline project from … · executive summary- cpcl pipeline...

Documents