food processing contaminants – progress and challenges in

18
Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in Mitigation Strategies and Challenges in Mitigation Strategies D Ri h d St dl N tlé P d tT h l C t Ob S it l d Dr. Richard Stadler, Nestlé Product T echnology Centre, Orbe, Switzerland

Upload: hoangdung

Post on 14-Feb-2017

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in Mitigation Strategiesand Challenges in Mitigation Strategies

D Ri h d St dl N tlé P d t T h l C t O b S it l dDr. Richard Stadler, Nestlé Product Technology Centre, Orbe, Switzerland

Page 2: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

ContentContent

• Acrylamide: the CIAA “Acrylamide• Acrylamide: the CIAA “AcrylamideToolbox”

F

Toolbox”

F• Furan

• 3 MCPD Esters

• Furan

• 3 MCPD Esters• 3-MCPD Esters

• Conclusion

• 3-MCPD Esters

• Conclusion• Conclusion• Conclusion

Page 3: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

CIAA Acrylamide yToolbox

• CIAA Acrylamide Toolbox updated• CIAA Acrylamide Toolbox updated February 2009

• Grocery Manufacturers AssociationGrocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) USA information integrated into the Toolbox; endorsement

d iand review • Progression toward a « global »

ToolboxToolbox• Acrylamide « pamphlets »

modified accordinglymodified accordingly

Page 4: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Key updates: Toolboxy p

• 14 parameters, « Processing: Asparaginase » listed as a separate tool

• “Recipe: Raising agents (e.g. ammonium and sodium salts)” modified to better reflect the content of the tool

• Sectorial reviews (CAOBISCO, ESA, UEITP = EPPA) included

• Information from Switzerland on sugar contents in potatoes• Information from Switzerland on sugar contents in potatoes taken into consideration

• Latest scientific publications and projects (e g BLL• Latest scientific publications and projects (e.g. BLL, Germany) included where relevant

Page 5: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Agronomical: sugarsg gPotato products

Selection of potato varieties with low reducing sugars that are suitable for the

Industrial scaleMinimising

g gproduct type is key• Lot selection based on reducing sugars Minimising

sugars has been part of standard

content (crisp industry) or colour assessment of a fried sample (French p

manufacturing practice

fry industry) • Controlling storage conditions from pfarm to factory; use of sprout suppressants following GAP;

di i i hi hreconditioning at higher temp.• Ensure that tubers are mature at time

f h tiof harvesting

Page 6: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Processing: Asparaginaseg p gCereal products (bread, crispbread, biscuits/bakery wares, breakfast cereals)

Industrial andIndustrial and Pilot scaleApplied to

• Significant reductions (~70-90%) achieved through the use of pp

commercial products (e.g.

i e b e d

gasparaginase in certain cereal dough-based snacks

gingerbread, crispbread, short sweet biscuits, RTE

• Certain products are today produced with the use of asparaginase without ,

cereals, certain cereal-based snacks)

ith t ti l l

any quality issues, e.g. gingerbread, crispbread and short sweet biscuits

i ifi d i iwith potential also in other biscuit and cereal product types

• No significant Asn reduction in a cooked and toasted coarse grain cerealp yp

Page 7: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Cereal Product Asparaginase

• Pilot runs: reduction of

Impact of asparaginase concentration on acrylamide level

100120

)Pilot runs: reduction of acrylamide >80%

• Scale-up to factory onditions a 40%

60

80100

mid

e (p

pb

conditions: ca. 40% reduction

02040

Acr

ylam

Key Parameters• Temperature increase

0 200 400 600 800

Asparaginase (ppm/soup)

required (25°C) • Enzyme conc, 120 mg/kg • No impact on• No impact on

organoleptic properties

Asparagine

Page 8: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Processing: Asparaginaseg p gCoffee & Coffee Mixtures

Lab scaleSignificant reductions in green coffee Asn levels

after an enzyme treatment (20-40% lower Lab scaleAssessment of the opportunity to

acrylamide) after roasting with magnitude depending on roast/blend conditions and when compared to an untreated coffee which haspp y

reduce the acrylamide levels in

t ffee th h

compared to an untreated coffee which has been roasted under same conditions.

roast coffee through a treatment of green coffee with

However, the full impact assessment needs to include the following considerations:Sensorial evaluations of trial samples showed

asparaginase is under way

- Sensorial evaluations of trial samples showed significant differences in flavour

- Scaling up ……… - Assess if this reduction will not get almost

"neutralized" during typical shelf life period of roast coffeeof roast coffee

Page 9: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Furan Several routes of formation

Potential considerations based on model system Ascorbic acid Other ystudies

• “Optimized” amounts of Amino

precursors?

[O] StreckerOptimized amounts of antioxidants in recipes• Possible addition of PUFA

PUFAs acids

Maillard

degradation

after heat-treatment• Impact of heat treatment in case of asco bic acid

Sugars / AminesMaillard

in case of ascorbic acid fortification

Page 10: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

FURAN: European Coffee pIndustry Task Group project*

ObjectiveTo understand Furan formation potential at roasting and the effect of subsequent processing steps and the consumer practices

Key Findings

• Amounts are significantly reduced until the coffee is finally consumed (< 10 % of initially formed furan at roasting gets into the cup)p)

• Levels directly after roasting are dependent on roasting conditions

• Many desired coffee aroma components are volatile as well• Many desired coffee aroma components are volatile as wellmeasures to retain aroma components for quality reasons will also limit furan losses

*Guenther et al. Submitted: Food Additives & Contaminants 2009

Page 11: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Furan: Key Findings (Examples)y g ( p )

GrindingAt grinding furan levels are reduced. Fine grinds (< 300 µm) from same

ff ill t i ll lt i lcoffees will typically result in lower levels (up to 40%)

Opened Roast & Ground coffee packagesOpened packages during use

Roast & Ground coffee packages typically contain coffee for more than one brewing. Any re-opening will allow furan losses (20 25%) Thisduring use-

up periodallow furan losses (20-25%). This effect needs to be considered when targeting to determine typical R&G g g ypanalytical data for exposure estimates

Page 12: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Furan: Key Findings (Examples)y g ( p )

Brewing and keeping

Significant losses of furan occur at brewing. Brewing conditions (temperature time design ofkeeping

coffee hot(temperature, time, design of equipment) are determinants

Brew recipeHigher brew recipe = higher furan levels per ml of brew (espresso preparation Brew recipemay have higher furan brew concentration but cup volumes are lower and overall consumption rate compared to standard coffees is less)

Page 13: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

3-MCPD estersIntensive efforts to close knowledge gapsg p

• Need for further research on the formation of 3-MCPD esters

• Efforts should be made to reduce the levels of 3-MCPD esters in edible oils, foods containing fats, and infant formulas

Page 14: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

3-MCPD estersKey results of industry-driven projects*

• Seed oils typicallySeed oils typically considerably lower in MCPD esters than palm-based fats

• Deodorization: key process• Deodorization: key process step for the formation of MCPD esters during refining (temperature)(temperature)

• Variation of classical refining parameters (deodorization time and temperature) doestime and temperature) does not allow to reduce the MCPD ester content in fully refined oilsoils

• Chemical vs. physical refining: not a significant difference in the MCPD ester contentthe MCPD ester content

* FEDIOL presentation, ILSI / EC Workshop, 5/6 Feb, Brussels.http://europe.ilsi.org/events/past/PresentationsMCPDworkshop.htm

Page 15: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

3-MCPD estersKey results of industry-driven projects

• Clear link between precursors like chloride and diglyceride content could not yet be establishedcontent could not yet be established

• Parameter(s) triggering the formation of MCPD esters not yet elucidated

Conclusion• Currently not possible to produce palm-based

fats low in MCPD esters• More understanding of formation mechanisms is

required• FEI/BLL research project to assess technological

possibilities to minimise 3-MCPD esters in refined l )oils (refining conditions, model studies, mitigation)

Page 16: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Glycidol esters in refined vegetable y goilsA new concern ?A new concern ?

F l id l t i• For glycidol esters in vegetable oil : no direct method of analysis and no H2C H2C Cl

Clmethod of analysis and no capability to reliably quantify the glycidol esters N i l i l di

H2C

HCO

H2C

HC

Cl

OHH• No toxicological studies on

the esters• No studies on possible

H2C

O

H2C

O

H

• No studies on possible hydrolysis of the esters in vivo

O

R

OO

R

O

• No knowledge on the mechanism(s) of formation of the esters in refined

R R

of the esters in refined vegetable oils

Page 17: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

ConclusionConclusion

Awareness that food contains a multitude of different compounds with many health

beneficial and potentially hazardous effects

Appl a holistic app oach e al ate the potential

beneficial and potentially hazardous effects

Apply a holistic approach: evaluate the potential risks of individual compounds (e.g. acrylamide,

furan) together with the health benefits of the food

(e g whole grain PUFAs)(e.g. whole grain, PUFAs)

risk-benefit modelling as a basis for defining…… risk benefit modelling as a basis for defining priorities and to support management decisions

Page 18: Food Processing Contaminants – Progress and Challenges in

Thank you !y

The balanced diet …..

… for health and wellness