food deterioration and food safety 1.chemical 2.enzymatic 3.physical 4. microbiological a. the good...

97
FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1. CHEMICAL 2. ENZYMATIC 3. PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Upload: anthony-mccormick

Post on 27-Mar-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY

1. CHEMICAL

 

2. ENZYMATIC

 

3. PHYSICAL

4. MICROBIOLOGICAL

A. THE GOOD

B. THE BAD

C. AND THE UGLY

Page 2: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

• FOOD SPOILAGE – PROCESS THAT MAKES FOOD INEDIBLE

 

• FOOD FERMENTATION – PROCESS THAT CHANGES THE FOOD’S SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS AND INCREASES THE SHELF–LIFE OF THE ORIGINAL FOOD

Page 3: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

• FOOD BORNE ILLNESS – INFECTIONS OR POISONING DUE TO THESE MICROORGANISMS

• MICROORGANISMS – SMALL ORGANISMS INVISIBLE TO THE NAKED EYE.

Page 4: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH IS DEPENDENT UPON SEVERAL

FACTORS.

1. pH – MEASURE OF ACIDITY

ACIDIC < 7.0 > ALKALINE

GROWTH BETTER NEAR NEUTRALITY

Page 5: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. MOISTURE CONTENT – Aw MEASURE OF FREE WATER. MORE DRY <1.00(MAX)

GROW BETTER NEAR 1.00

 

3. TEMPERATURE – MOST ORGANISMS GROW BEST AT AMBIENT TEMPERATURES (600 – 800 F)

Page 6: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

4. PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF OXYGEN

WITH O2 – AEROBIC.

WITHOUT O2 – ANAEROBIC.

Page 7: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

TYPES

1. BACTERIA – A VARIETY OF UNICELLULAR ORGANISMS THAT GROW UNDER A VARIETY

OF CONDITIONS

 • TYPICALLY FAST GROWERS UNDER THE RIGHT CONDITIONS.

Page 8: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

• NOT ALL ARE SPOILAGE AND DISEASE ORGANISMS i.e. FERMENTATION

• DISEASE PRODUCING ORGANISMS TYPICALLY MORE SENSITIVE TO ADVERSE GROWTH CONDITIONS

Page 9: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

WIDE VARIETY

1.   SOME BACTERIA GROW AT:

• REFRIGERATOR TEMPERATURES (PSYCHROPHILES) 450 F (7.20 C) TO 860 F (300 C); PSYCHROTROPHS

Page 10: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SOME BACTERIA GROW AT (cont.):

• ROOM TEMPERATURE (MESOPHILES); 680 F (200 C) – 1100 F (43.30 C)

 • HIGHER TEMPERATURES (THERMOPHILES;1130 C – 1550 C)

Page 11: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. SOME FORM SPORES THAT CAN SURVIVE ADVERSE CONDITIONS

 

3. SOME CAN GROW IN HIGH ACID FOODS

Page 12: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD INFECTIONS

• INGESTED BACTERIA CAUSING ILLNESS

Page 13: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD INFECTIONS

1. CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS – FORMS SPORES AND ANAEROBIC.

• SYMPTOMS: DIARRHEA, ABDOMINAL PAIN, HEADACHE, 8 TO 24 HRS INCUBATION.

• SOURCES: MEATS AND GRAVIES.

• PREVENTION: PROPER COOLING OF FOOD.

Page 14: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. E.COLI – ALL TYPES OF FOOD. AVOID PRACTICES WHICH CAN CONTAMINATE FOOD.

• DIARRHEA, VOMITING. 18–24 HRS. RENAL FAILURE IN CHILDREN (0157:H7).

 • PROPER COOKING OF GROUND BEEF, APPLE CIDER, PREVENTION OF CROSS CONTAMINATION (RAW FOOD AND FOOD HANDLERS).

Page 15: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

3. SALMONELLA – SALMONELLOSIS • SYMPTOMS: DIARRHEA, ABDOMINAL CRAMPS, VOMITING, FEVER. CAN LAST TWO OR THREE DAYS. INCUBATION, 12 TO 36 HRS.

 • SOURCES: EGGS (2.6–7%) AND MEATS (30% POULTRY ESTIMATED). MILK. CARRIERS (REMEMBER TYPHOID MARY).

Page 16: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

• PREVENTION: REFRIGERATION, PROPER FOOD HANDLING PRACTICES, AVOID FOOD CONTACT WITH PESTS. HEATING FOODS (POULTRY, STUFFING, ETC.) TO AT LEAST 1650 F (65.50 C). PASTEURIZE EGGS 1400 F (600 C) FOR 3–4 MIN. PRIOR TO FREEZING OR DRYING. COOK ALL EGGS (WHITES AND YOLKS SHOULD BE SOLID: USDA). SALMONELLA–FREE PETS. GOOD PERSONAL HYGIENE.

Page 17: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

4. LISTERIA – (LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES)

• WIDELY DISTRIBUTED IN NATURE. GROWS AT REFRIGERATOR TEMPERATURES ONLY 100 TO 1000 CELLS REQUIRED.

Page 18: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

(LISTERIA cont.)

• SYMPTOMS: WIDE VARIETY OF ILLNESSES, 1 DAY TO WEEKS AFTER INGESTION. MILD FLU–LIKE FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE. ELDERLY, PREGNANT WOMEN, INFANTS, IMMUNOCOMPRIOMISED: MENINGITIS, MISCARRIAGE, PERINATAL SEPTICEMIA.

Page 19: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

(LISTERIA cont.)

• SOURCES: COLESLAW, RAW MILK, SOFT CHEESE ($66 MILLION), SEAFOOD, MEATS.

 

• PREVENTION: ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION, PROPER PASTEURIZATION, CHLORINATED WATER, CONTROL AIRFLOW THROUGH PLANTS. USDA INSPECTION/REPORTING PROGRAM.

Page 20: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

5. CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI.

• SYMPTOMS: IN 2–5 DAYS NAUSEA, CRAMS, HEADACHE, DIARRHEA FEVER: COMPLICATIONS MENINGITIS, SYSTEMIC INFECTION

Page 21: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

(CAMPYLOBACTER JEJUNI cont.)

• SOURCES: FECAL MATERIAL, RAW MILK, EGGS, POULTRY, MEAT, CAKE ICING.

 • PREVENTION: THROUGH COOKING AND PROPER HANDLING OF RAW PRODUCTS. CAN'T GROW <300 C

Page 22: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

6. YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITIA.- GROWS AT REFRIGERATOR TEMPERATURES.

• SYMPTOMS: 1–2 DAYS DIARRHEA, FEVER, and SEVERE ABDOMINAL PAIN IN LOWER RIGHT QUADRANT (SIMILAR TO APPENDICITIS)

Page 23: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SOURCES: WIDELY DISTRIBUTED IN NATURE. MILK CONTAMINATED BY CHOCOLATE SYRUP AFTER PASTEURIZATION, CONTAMINATED SPRING WATER, AND MEAT.

 PREVENTION: PASTEURIZATION, WATER TREATMENT (CHLORINATE), ACIDIFY FOODS <4.6, SALT>5%.

Page 24: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD POISONINGS (INTOXICATIONS)

• INGESTED TOXIN LEFT IN FOOD BY ORGANISM.

Page 25: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

1. BOTULISM – CLOSTRIDIUM BOTULINUM. FORMS SPORES AND ANAEROBIC. TYPE A, B, AND E AFFECT HUMANS. TYPE E CAN GROW AT REFRIGERATOR TEMPERATURES [380 F (3.30 C)] ANTITOXIN TREATMENT AVAILABLE.

INFANT BOTULISM NOT CONSIDERED A FOODBORNE DISEASE.

Page 26: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SYMPTOMS: NEUROTOXIN CAUSING MUSCLE PARALYSIS AND DEATH. INABILITY TO TALK, DIFFICULTY IN SWALLOWING, DOUBLE VISION, NAUSEA, VOMITING, DIARRHEA, CONSTIPATION IN EARLY STAGES. SYMPTOMS START 12 – 36 HRS AFTER EATING. DEATH IN AROUND 7 DAYS (20% NOW; TURN OF THE CENTURY – 50 TO 60%).

Page 27: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SOURCE: SEEN TYPICALLY IN LOW ACID (LOW ACID) HOME CANNED FOODS (pH > 4.5), SALMON, TUNA, MUSHROOMS, POTATO SOUP, BEEF STEW, UNREFRIGERATED BAKED POTATOES, GARLIC IN OIL, AND SOME SMOKED FISH.

Page 28: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

PREVENTION: CAN LOW ACID FOODS PROPERLY (HIGH TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE), ACIDIFY, COOK SUSPECTED FOODS PROPERLY [2120F(1000 C)]. STORE FISH BELOW 380 F.

Page 29: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. STAPHYLOCCOCAL – STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS

• TOXIN IS HEAT STABLE (WITHSTANDS BOILING 20–60 MINUTES. GROWS 440 F (6.70

C) 1120 F (44.40 C)

Page 30: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SYMPTOMS: VOMITING AND DIARRHEA FROM 1 TO 6 HRS AFTER EATING.

SOURCES: HAM (SALT TOLERANT –10%; HAMS USUALLY 2–3% SALT), CREAM OR CUSTARD FILLED BAKED PRODUCTS, POTATO SALAD, HUMANS (40%) NASAL PASSAGES, WOUNDS, COWS WITH MASTITIS, 1989 CHINESE CANNED MUSHROOMS.

Page 31: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

PREVENTION: PROPER HANDLING PRACTICES, REFRIGERATION BELOW 40 F (4.40 C), ELIMINATE MILK FROM COWS WITH MASTITIS FROM HUMAN CONSUMPTION.

Page 32: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

3. BACILLUS CEREUS – SPORE FORMER

SYMPTOMS: ABDOMINAL CRAMPS, WATERY DIARRHEA, SOME VOMITING.

 

SOURCES: IMPROPERLY COOLED FOODS, HOLDING TEMPERATURES AND IMPROPERLY REHEATED FOODS (RICE)

 

PREVENTION: PROPER COOLING AND RE-HEATING [1650 F (73.90 C)].

Page 33: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MISCELLANEOUS OTHERS:

TUBERCULOSIS –CORYNEBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS AND BRUCELLOSIS (UNDULANT FEVER) RAW MILK.

 

VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS – FOUND IN OCEANS. REQUIRES 24% SALT. WITH OR WITHOUT OXYGEN OPTIMUM 86–1040 F (30-400 C)

Page 34: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SYMPTOMS: 15–17 HOURS AFTER INGESTION. DURATION 1–2 DAYS ABDOMINAL PAIN, NAUSEA, VOMITING WITH DIARRHEA, OCCASIONAL BLOOD AND MUCUS IN FECES. FEVER (1–20 F IN 60-70% OF THE CASES).

Page 35: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SOURCES: RAW FISH, MOLLUSKS AND SHELLFISH.

 PREVENTION: COOKING, SANITATION, ABSTAIN FROM EATING RAW SQUID, OCTOPUS, CLAMS AND OYSTERS IN JULY, AUGUST, SEPTEMBER OR TIMES THAT COASTAL WATERS ARE WARM.

Page 36: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

DISEASES FROM OTHER MICROORGANISMS

1. TRICHINOSIS – ROUNDWORM

SYMPTOMS: NAUSEA, VOMITING, DIARRHEA IN 1–4 DAYS IF HIGH DOSE. IF LOW DOSE NO SYMPTOMS UNTIL 7TH DAY. LARVAE CAN MIGRATE FROM THE INTESTINES INTO MUSCLES CAUSING HIGH FEVER [1040

F(400 C] AND SWELLING.

Page 37: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

SOURCE: TYPICALLY TRANSMITTED THROUGH EATING PORK,(BEAR, PORK/DEER, UNDER COOKED SAUSAGE)

PREVENTION: COOK PORK TO INTERNAL TEMPERATURE OF AT LEAST 137 F (58.30 C), NO PINK COLOR,(NATIONAL LIVESTOCK AND MEAT BOARD – 770 C (1700 F), FRESH FROZEN PORK 520 F (–15 TO 28.90C) FOR A PERIOD OF 6–30 DAYS, ETC., CONTROL AND COOK FEED GIVEN TO HOGS.

Page 38: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. HEPATITIS TYPE A – VIRUS.

CONTROL BY PROPER HANDLING PRACTICES.

 

NORWALK VIRUS – VOMITING

Page 39: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

YEAST

1. LARGER THAN BACTERIA 

2. MORE ADVANCED PHYSIOLOGICALLY

 

3. CAN GROW UNDER MORE ADVERSE CONDITIONS

 

4. TYPICALLY SPOILAGE OR FERMENTATIVE ORGANISMS

 

5. VERY HEAT SENSITIVE

Page 40: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MOLDS

1. ADVANCED PHYSIOLOGICALLY

– CAN BE MULTICELLULAR 

2. PRODUCE SPORES THAT ARE LESS HEAT RESISTANT THAN BACTERIAL SPORES

 

3. NEED OXYGEN TO GROW

Page 41: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MOLDS (cont.)

4. CAN GROW UNDER THE MOST ADVERSE CONDITIONS

– SLOW GROWTH 

5. CAN BE SPOILAGE OR PATHOGENIC OR DESIRABLE (BLUE CHEESE)

 

– TOXIN PRODUCTION (MYCOTOXINS)

Page 42: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

AFLATOXIN – MOLD POISONING 

• PRODUCED BY ASPERGILLUS FLAVUS

 

• TYPICALLY FOUND ON CEREAL GRAINS AT THE PROPER MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE

– CORN

– PEANUTS

Page 43: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

AFLATOXIN (cont.)

• FATAL AT LARGE DOSES, TYPICALLY LIVER DAMAGE.

• CARCINOGENIC AT LOW DOSES 

• YEAST AND MOLD INHIBITORS • PROPIONATES, PHOSPHATES, SORBATES

Page 44: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL

1. PERSONNEL STANDARDS

– HAND WASHING

– HEALTHY

– HAIR COVERING, GLOVES

– CLOTHING

Page 45: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

2. INGREDIENT CONTROL (SENSITIVE)

– PRODUCTS FROM ANIMALS

– SPICES

– PRODUCTS THAT ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL

Page 46: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

3. PLANT CLEANNESS

CLEAN: REMOVE POTENTIAL FOOD AND HIDING PLACES FOR

MICROORGANISMS AND PLACES FOR VECTORS

SANITIZE: KILL MOST OR ALL OF THE ORGANISMS ON SURFACES

Page 47: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

4. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT DESIGN

– PREVENT POTENTIAL PLACES FOR MICROBIAL GROWTH AND MICROBIAL VECTORS.

 

5. FOODS MUST BE PROPERLY REFRIGERATED.

Page 48: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

6. FOODS MUST BE ADEQUATELY PROCESSED AND PROTECTED FROM RECONTAMINATION (CROSS–CONTAMINATION).

 

7. THE MANAGEMENT MUST STRESS PRODUCT SAFETY AND QUALITY.

Page 49: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHFs)

• Foods that contains in whole or in part of the following:

– Milk or milk products

– Shell eggs

– Meats

– Poultry

– Fish

Page 50: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHFs)

– Shellfish– Edible crustaceans (shrimp, lobster, etc.)– Baked or boiled potatoes– Tofu or other soy products including textured

soy proteins– Plant foods that have been treated (beans)

Page 51: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHFs)

– Raw seed sprouts

– Sliced melons

– Unpasteurized fruit juices (apple)

Page 52: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD SAFETY – YOU DON’T WANT A RECALL

• Regulatory agencies can issue public warnings.

• Recalls and seizures are not uncommon. They occur at a rate of about 400/year.

• It is one of the major responsibilities of all food processors to produce safe and wholesome food for the consuming public.

Page 53: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Procedures to Help Reduce Food-borne Illnesses

• Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs)

• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

• Sanitary Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs)

• Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCPs)

• Management Support

Page 54: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 110

• Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding Human Food (CGMP or GMP)

• See Appendix 1 for more detailed examples.

Page 55: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Good Manufacturing Practices

• Personal Hygiene

• Quality Raw ingredients

• Sanitary Storage

• Processing

• Packaging Areas

Page 56: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Outside the Plant

• Parking and roads paved and graded to

drain.

• Building constructed to prevent pest entry.

Page 57: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Receiving

• Truck dock entries constructed to prevent

bird nests other pests from entering plant.

• Trucks clean inside, good condition, and

tightly constructed and refrigerated if

appropriate.

Page 58: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Processing• Time-temperature, pH, aw processing

controls maintained in good condition and

calibrated regularly with records retained.

• Proper cleaning and sanitizing of equipment

and surrounding areas.

• Cleaning supplies stored in a separate area.

Page 59: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Packaging

• Good sanitation and housekeeping in the

area.

• Cleanliness of packaging equipment.

• Packaging materials protected from

contamination.

• Metal detectors in place.

Page 60: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD SAFETY – YOU DON’T WANT A RECALL

• Regulatory agencies can issue public warnings.

• Recalls and seizures are not uncommon. They occur at a rate of about 400/year.

• It is one of the major responsibilities of all food processors to produce safe and wholesome food for the consuming public.

Page 61: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Procedures to Help Reduce Food-borne Illnesses

• Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs)

• Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

• Sanitary Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs)

• Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCPs)

• Management Support

Page 62: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 110

• Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Processing, Packing, or Holding Human Food (CGMP or GMP)

• See Appendix 1 for more detailed examples.

Page 63: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Good Manufacturing Practices

• Personal Hygiene

• Quality Raw ingredients

• Sanitary Storage

• Processing

• Packaging Areas

Page 64: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Outside the Plant

• Parking and roads paved and graded to

drain.

• Building constructed to prevent pest entry.

Page 65: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Receiving

• Truck dock entries constructed to prevent

bird nests other pests from entering plant.

• Trucks clean inside, good condition, and

tightly constructed and refrigerated if

appropriate.

Page 66: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Processing• Time-temperature, pH, aw processing

controls maintained in good condition and

calibrated regularly with records retained.

• Proper cleaning and sanitizing of equipment

and surrounding areas.

• Cleaning supplies stored in a separate area.

Page 67: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Packaging

• Good sanitation and housekeeping in the

area.

• Cleanliness of packaging equipment.

• Packaging materials protected from

contamination.

• Metal detectors in place.

Page 68: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Food Product Storage

• Clean storage area with good housekeeping.

• Rotation control (First In First Out)

• Temperature and humidity control.

• Rodent and insect control.

• Protect food packages against physical, chemical and microbial contamination and package deterioration.

Page 69: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Personnel and Training• A worker with a health problem that could

contaminate food or food equipment shall be excluded from working with food.

• Wash hand thoroughly prior to contact with food or sanitized equipment.

• Protect food against contamination from hair, perspiration, objects, cosmetics, tobacco, chemicals and medicines applied to the skin.

• Appropriate training and evaluation

Page 70: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs)

• Sanitation SOPs are important and useful for the following reasons:• Outline proper procedures.• Train personnel.• Provide consistency.• Document what is being done.

Page 71: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HACCP & FOOD SAFETY

• Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)• Prevention Programs • Consists of seven steps• Application to the Soyfood Industry

(encouraged)• Soymilk

• Tofu

Page 72: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HACCP & FOOD SAFETY

• The Basis of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)• Current Good Manufacturing Practices

(CGMPs)• Standard Operating Procedure (SOPs)• Sanitation Standard Operating Procedure

(SSOPs)

Page 73: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points Systems (HACCP)

• Assessing the hazards

– Sensitive ingredients (products from animals,

spices, products that are in contact with the

soil)

• Determine the critical control points (CCPs)

Page 74: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points Systems (HACCP)• Establish procedures to monitor CCPS.

• Establish the control limits for each CCP

• Establish corrective action to be taken if a deviation is identified at a CCP.

Page 75: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points Systems (HACCP)

• Establish effective record-keeping systems that document the HACCP plan.

• Establish procedures for verification that the HACCP system is working correctly.

Page 76: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Fitting HACCP into the Company QA System

• Specifications - Very complete all safety, quality criteria and the CCPs.

• Safety analysis - Hazard Analysis - Basis for establishing CCPs

• Purchase requirements - Approved suppliers – ingredients and equipment.

HH. Bauman

Cereal Foods World 36:42. 1991.

HH. Bauman

Cereal Foods World 36:42. 1991.

Page 77: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Application of HACCP to Soymilk and Tofu Manufacturing

• Raw Materials

• Heat Processes

• Packaging

• Storage

Page 78: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Application of HACCP• HACCP systems should focus on particulars

– Each production line for each product in each plant

• Developing and validating a HACCP plan must be at the plant site.

• Generic HACCP systems can not be mandated by Federal Agencies and be expected to be effective.

Page 79: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY
Page 80: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HACCP & FOOD SAFETY

• Food Safety– Recalls and Loss of Consumer Confidence– Recent Interest in Food Safety– Soyfoods and Food Safety

Page 81: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HACCP & FOOD SAFETY

• The Basis of Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)– Current Good Manufacturing Practices

(CGMPs)– Standard Operating Procedure (SOPs)– Sanitation Standard Operating Procedure

(SSOPs)

Page 82: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HACCP & FOOD SAFETY

• Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)– What it can or can not do– The seven steps (general)– Application to the Soyfood Industry

• Soymilk

• Tofu

Page 83: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FOOD SAFETY – YOU DON’T WANT A RECALL

• Regulatory agencies can issue public warnings.

• Recalls and seizures are not uncommon. They occur at a rate of about 400 / year.

• It is one of the major responsibilities of all food processors to produce safe and wholesome food for the consuming public.

Page 84: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 110

• CURRENT GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE IN MANUFACTURING, PROCESSING, PACKING, OR HOLDING HUMAN FOOD (CGMP or GMP)

– Outside the Plant

– Receiving

– Storage

– Processing

– Packaging

– Food Product Storage

– Personnel and Training

Page 85: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Good Manufacturing Practices

• Personal Hygiene

• Quality Raw Ingredients

• Sanitary Storage, Processing and Packaging Areas

• Sanitary Processing and Packaging Equipment

• Food Quality Equipment

• Process Control

Page 86: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL

• Personnel Standards– Hand Washing

– Healthy

– Hair Covering, Gloves

– Clothing

• Ingredient Control (Sensitive)– Products from the Soil or Animals

– Spices

– Geographic Locations

Page 87: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL

• Plant Cleanliness– Clean: Remove Potential Food And Hiding

Places for Microorganisms, and Places for Vectors to Hide.

– Sanitize: Kill Most or All of the Organisms on Surfaces.

Page 88: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL

• Plant and Equipment Design– Prevent Potential Places for Microbial Growth

and Microbial Vectors– Foods Must Be Properly Refrigerated,

Temperature, Small Containers

Page 89: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

MICROBIOLOGICAL PROCESS CONTROL

• Foods Must Be Adequately Processed and Protected from Recontamination (Cross- Contamination).

• The Management Must Stress Product Safety and Quality.

Page 90: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures (SSOPs)

• Sanitation SOPs are important and useful for the following reasons:– Outline proper procedures.– Train personnel.– Provide consistency.– Document what is being done.

Page 91: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HAZARD ANALYSIS & CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS SYSTEMS (HACCP)

• ASSESSING THE HAZARDS

• DETERMINE THE CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS (CCPs)

• ESTABLISH THE CONTROL LIMITS FOR EACH CCP.

• ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO MONITOR CCPs

Page 92: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

HAZARD ANALYSIS & CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS SYSTEMS (HACCP)• ESTABLISH CORRECTIVE ACTION TO

BE TAKEN IF A DEVIATION IS IDENTIFIED AT A CCP.

• ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE RECORD-KEEPING SYSTEMS THAT DOCUMENTTHE HACCP PLAN

• ESTABLISH PROCEDURES FOR VERIFICATION THAT THE HACCP SYSTEM ISWORKING CORRECTLY.

Page 93: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FITTING HACCP INTO THE COMPANY QA SYSTEM

• SPECIFICATIONS - Very complete all safety, quality criteria and the CCPs.

• SAFETY ANALYSIS - Hazard Analysis - Basis for establishing CCPs

• PURCHASE REQUIREMENTS -Approved suppliers – ingredients and equipment.

H. Bauman

Cereal Foods World 36:42. 1991.

H. Bauman

Cereal Foods World 36:42. 1991.

Page 94: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FITTING HACCP INTO THE COMPANY QA SYSTEM

• GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES (GMPs) - INCORPORATED

• PHYSICAL SYSTEMS HAZARD CONTROL (PSHC)

• RECALL SYSTEM

Page 95: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

FITTING HACCP INTO THE COMPANY QA SYSTEM

• FACILITY AUDITING - PERIODIC BASIS.

• CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS

• INCIDENT REPORTING

Page 96: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

OVERVIEW OF MONITORING ACTIVITIES

• LOT TESTING

• PRECERTIFICATION AND SPOT TESTING (VERIFICATION)

• CONTINUOUS RECORDING OF CRITICAL FACTORS

Page 97: FOOD DETERIORATION AND FOOD SAFETY 1.CHEMICAL 2.ENZYMATIC 3.PHYSICAL 4. MICROBIOLOGICAL A. THE GOOD B. THE BAD C. AND THE UGLY

OVERVIEW OF MONITORING ACTIVITIES

• VISUAL INSPECTION OF CCP'S WHERE THIS IS EFFECTIVE

• MICROBIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL, OR PHYSICAL TESTING FOR DIRECTOR INDIRECT MONITORING OF CCP