TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Linguistics of Birdsong’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, 3, 2011,113-121. ; Part 4: Unification 16. Lyle Jenkins, ‘Unification inBiolinguistics’, in L. Jenkins (ed.), Variation and Universals inBiolinguistics (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002), pp. 317-339.; 17. C.R. Gallistel, ‘The Foundational Abstractions’, in MassimoPiattelli-Palmirini, Juan Uriagereka and Pello Salaburu (eds),Of Minds and Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in theBasque Country (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp.58-73.; 18. Anna Maria Di Sciullo, et al, ‘The Biological Natureof Human Language’, Biolinguistics 4, 2010, 4–33. ; Volume 2:Language Development, Acquisition, Impairments ; Contents;Acknowledgements; Part 5: Acquisition; 19. Noam Chomsky,‘A Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior’, Language 35, 1,1959, 26–58. ; 20. Eric H. Lenneberg, ‘On Explaining Language’,Science 164, 1969, 635-643. ; 21. Stephen Crain and MineharuNakayama, ‘Structure Dependence in Grammar Formation’,Language 63, 3, 1987, 522-543. ; 22. Kenneth Wexler,‘Innateness and Maturation in Linguistic Development’,Developmental Psychology 23, 3, 1990, 645-660.; 23. StephenCrain and Paul Pietroski, ‘Nature, Nurture and UniversalGrammar’, Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 2001, 139-186. ; 24.Naama Friedmann, Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi. ‘RelativizedRelatives: Types of Intervention in the Acquisition of A-barDependencies’, Lingua 119, 2008, 67-88. ; 25. Thomas G. Bever,‘The Canonical Form Constraint: Language Acquisition via aGeneral Theory of Learning’, in Jiansheng Guo et al,Cross-linguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language(Oxford University Press, 2008), pp. 475-492. ; 26. C. R. Gallistel,‘Learning and Memory’, in G. O. Mazur (ed.), Thirty YearCommemoration of the Life of A.R. Luria (New York: SemenenkoFoundation, 2008), pp. 49-61. ; 27. Robert C. Berwick PaulPietroski, Beracah Yankama and Noam Chomsky, ‘Poverty ofthe Stimulus Revisited’, Cognitive Science 35, 2011, 1207–1242.; 28. Andrea Santi, Angela D. Friederici, Michiru Makuuchi andYosef Grodzinsky, ‘An fMRI Study Dissociating DistanceMeasures Computed by Broca's Area in MovementProcessing: Clause Boundary vs. Identity’, Frontiers inPsychology May 2015.; Part 6: Impairments; 29. KennethWexler, ‘Lenneberg’s Dream: Learning, Normal LanguageDevelopment and Specific Language Impairment’, in YonataLevi and Jeannette Schaeffer (eds), Language CompetenceAcross Populations: Toward a Definition of Specific LanguageImpairment (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003), pp. 11-61.; 30. Cecilia S. L. Lai, Dianne Gerrelli, Anthony P. Monaco,Simon E. Fisher and Andrew J. Copp, ‘FOXP2 Expression duringBrain Development Coincides with Adult Sites of Pathologyin a Severe Speech and Language Disorder’, Brain 126, 2003,2455-2462.; 31. Danielle S. Ross and Thomas G. Bever, ‘TheTime Course for Language Acquisition in Biologically DistinctPopulations: Evidence from Deaf Individuals’, Brain andLanguage 89, 2004, 115–121. ; 32. D. V. M. Bishop, C. V. Adamsand C. F. Norbury, ‘Distinct Genetic Influences on Grammarand Phonological Short-term Memory Deficits: Evidence from6-year-old Twins’, Genes, Brain and Behavior 5, 2005, 158–169.; 33. Kay D. MacDermot, et al, ‘Identification of FOXP2Truncation as a Novel Cause of Developmental Speech andLanguage Deficits’, American Journal of Human Genetics 76,2005, 1074-1080. ; 34. Karin Stromswold, ‘The Genetics ofSpeech and Language Impairments’, The New England Journalof Medicine 359, 2008, 2381–2383 ; Volume III. LanguageVariation, Parameters, Evolution; Contents;Acknowledgements; Part 7: Variation 35. GiuseppeLongobardi, ‘Methods in Parametic Linguistics and CognitiveHistory’, in P. Pica (ed.), Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3, 2003,101-138.; 36. Bettelou Los, review of ‘Syntactic Change: AMinimalist Approach to Grammaticalization’, Journal ofLinguistics 41, 2005, 220-225. ; 37. Giuseppe Longobardi andIan Roberts, ‘Universals, Diversity and Change in the Scienceof Language: Reaction to "The Myth of Language Universalsand Cognitive Science"’, Lingua 120, 2010, 2699– 2703. ; 38.Partha Niyogi and Robert C. Berwick, ‘The Proper Treatmentof Language Acquisition and Change in a Population Setting’,PNAS 106, 25, 2009, 10124–10129. ; 39. Richard S. Kayne, ‘WhyAre There No Directionality Parameters?’, in M. ByramWashburn, K. McKinneyBock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer and B.Tomaszewicz (eds), Proceedings of the 28th West CoastConference on Formal Linguistics (Somerville, Mass.: CascadillaPress, 2011), pp. 1-23. ; 40. Theresa Biberauer, AndersHolmberg and Ian Roberts, ‘A Syntactic Universal and itsConsequences’, Linguistic Inquiry, 45, 2, 2014, 169-225. ; 41.Giuseppe Longobardi, et al, ‘Across Language Families:Genome Diversity Mirrors Linguistic Variation Within Europe’,American Journal of Physical Anthropology 157, 4, 2015,630-640. ; 42. Matthieu Willems, et al, ‘Using HybridizationNetworks to Retrace the Evolution of Indo-EuropeanLanguages’, BMC Evolutionary Biology 16, 180, 2016. ; Part 8:Evolution 43. Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini,’What is Language,that it May have Evolved, and What is Evolution, that it MayApply to Language’, in R. Larson, V. Deprez & Y. Yamakido(eds), The Evolution of Human Language: BiolinguisticPerspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010),pp 148-162. ; 44. Karin Stromswold, ‘Genetics and theEvolution of Language: What Genetic Studies Reveal aboutthe Evolution of Language’, in R. K. Larson, V. Déprez and H.Yamakido (eds), Evolution of Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 176-193.; 45. W. Tecumseh Fitch, ‘"Deep Homology" in the Biologyand Evolution of Language’, in A. M. Di Sciullo and C. Boeckx(eds), The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on theEvolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty (Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 135–166. ; 46. NoamChomsky, ‘Some Simple Evo-Devo Theses: How True MightThey Be for Language?’, in R. K. Larson, V. Déprez and H.Yamakido (eds), Evolution of Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 45-62. ;47. Constance Scharff and Jana Petri, ‘Evo-devo, DeepHomology and FoxP2: Implications for the Evolution ofSpeech and Language’, Philosophical Transactions of the RoyalSociety B 366, 2011, 2124–2140. ; 48. Robert C. Berwick, AngelaD. Friederici, Noam Chomsky and Johan J. Bolhuis, ‘Evolution,Brain and the Nature of Language’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences17, 2, 2012, 89–98. ; 49. Vitor A. Nobrega and ShigeruMiyagawa. ‘The Precedence of Syntax in the Rapid Emergenceof Human Language in Evolution as Defined by theIntegration Hypothesis’, Frontiers in Psychology 6, 271, 2015. ;50. Anna Maria Di Sciullo and Stanca Somesfalean, ‘ObjectPronouns in the Evolution of Romanian: A BiolinguisticPerspective’, in V. Hill (eds), Formal Approaches to DPs in OldRomanian (Leiden, Boston: Brill, 2015), pp. 269-290.; VolumeIV: Complexity, Grammar, Human/Animal Divide, Brain StudiesContents; Acknowledgements Part 9: Grammar 51. NoamChomsky, ‘Three Models for the Description of Language’,IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 2, 1956, 113–124. ; 52.Harry Van Der Hulst, ‘Units in the Analysis of Signs’, Phonology10, 2, 1993, 209-241. ; 53. Jeffrey Heinz and William Idsardi,‘Sentence and Word Complexity’, Science 333, 2011, 295-297.; 54. Tom Roeper, ‘The Acquisition of Recursion: HowFormalism Articulates the Child’s Path’, Biolinguistics 5, 1-2,2011, 57- 86. ; 55. Boban Arsenijević and Wolfram Hinzen, ‘Onthe Absence of X-within-X Recursion in Human Grammar’,Linguistic Inquiry 43, 3, 2012, 423–440. ; 56. Anna Maria DiSciullo, ‘On the Domain Specificity of the Human LanguageFaculty and the Effects of Principles of ComputationalEfficiency: Contrasting Language and Mathematics’, RevistaLinguiStica 11, 1, 2015, 28-56. ; Part 10: Human/Animal Divide57. Marc D. Hauser, Pogen MacNeilage and Molly Ware,‘Numerical Representation in Primates’, PNAS 93, 4, 1996,1514–1517. ; 58. Rochel Gelman and Sara Cordes, ‘Countingin Animals and Humans’, in E. Dupoux (ed.), Language, Brain,and Cognitive Development: Essays in Honor of Jacques Mehler(Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001), pp. 279-302. ; 59. W.Tecumseh Fitch and Marc D. Hauser, ‘ComputationalConstraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate’,Science 303, 2004, 377–380. ; 60. Michael C. Corballis,‘Recursion, Language and Starlings’, Cognitive Science 31,2007, 697-704; 61. Erich D. Jarvis, ‘Neural Systems for VocalLearning in Birds and Humans: A Synopsis’, Journal ofOrnithology 148, 2007, 35–44.; 62. D. M. Webb and J. Zhang,‘FoxP2 in Song-learning Birds and Vocal-learning Mammals’,Journal of Hereditary 96, 3, 2005, 212–216.; 63. Angela D.Friederici, ‘Language Development and the Ontogeny of theDorsal Pathway’, Frontiers in Evolutionary Neuroscience 4, 3,2012. ; Part 11: Brains studies 64. Massimo Piattelli-Palmariniand Juan Uriagereka, ‘Still a Bridge Too Far? BiolinguisticQuestions for Grounding Language on Brains’, Physics of LifeReviews 5, 2008, 207–224. ; 65. Angela D. Friederici and JensBrauer, ‘Syntactic Complexity in the Brain’, in T. Givon and M.Shibatan (eds), Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Acquisition,Neurocognition, Evolution (Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2009),pp. 491–506. ; 66. Angela D. Friederici, Jorg Bahlmann, RolandFriederich and Michiru Makuuchi, ‘The Neural Basis ofRecursion and Complex Syntactic Hierarchy’, Biolinguistics 5,1-2, 2011, 87–104.; 67. Roland Friedrich and Angela D.Friederici, ‘Mathematical Logic in the Human Brain: Syntax’,PLoS ONE 4, 5, 2009. ; 68. Roland Friedrich and Angela D.Friederici, ‘Mathematical Logic in the Human Brain: Semantics’,PLoS ONE, 8, 8, 2013. ; Index;

,

For more information visit:www.routledge.com/9781138859159