fluid power system investigation case study

Upload: mugilan-mohan

Post on 07-Aug-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    1/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 1

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    2/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 2

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    3/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 3

    Dynamic SystemInvestigation

    Process

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    4/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 4

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    5/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 5Typical Fluid Power System

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    6/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 6

    Advantages / Disadvantages / Challenges• Fluid Power is the transmission of forces and motions

    using a confined, pressurized fluid.

     – In hydraulic fluid power systems the fluid is oil, or,

    less commonly, water.

     – In pneumatic fluid power systems the fluid is air.

    • Fluid Power System Advantages – High Power Density

    • Fluid power is ideal for high speed, high force, high

    power applications. Compared to all otheractuation technologies, including electric motors

    which are limited by magnetic saturation, fluid

    power is unsurpassed for force and power density.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    7/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 7

     – Responsiveness and Bandwidth of Operation

    • Fluid power systems have a higher bandwidth thanelectric motors and can be used in applications

    that require fast starts, stops, and reversals, or that

    require high-frequency oscillations.

     – High Accuracy and Precision

    • Oil has a high bulk modulus; hydraulic systems

    can be accurately and precisely controlled.

    •  Advances in pneumatic components and controltheory have opened up new opportunities for

    pneumatic control applications.

     – Heat Dissipation and Lubrication Ensures Reliability• Fluid circulating to and from an actuator removes

    heat generated by the actuator doing work, and

    also lubricates moving parts of the components.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    8/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 8

    • Heat is the predominant damaging mechanism

    in electric and electronic systems andelectromechanical actuators and motors have

    limited ability to dissipate heat generated.

     – Compactness, Light Weight, and Flexibility

    • Fluid power cylinders and motors are relatively

    small and light weight. Flexible hoses allow

    compact packaging.

     – Stiffness• Hydraulic drives are stiff with respect to load

    disturbances; stiffness is the slope of the speed

     – torque (force) curve. Control gains required

    in a high-power hydraulic control system would

    be significantly less than the gains required in a

    comparable electromagnetic control system.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    9/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 9

    • Fluid Power System Disadvantages

     – Electric power is more readily available, cleaner and

    quieter, and easier to transmit. Hydraulic systems

    require pumps.

     – Oil leakage, flammability, and fluid contamination – Fluid cavitation and entrained air 

     – Challenging physics leads to more difficult modeling and

    control.

    • Fluid Power System Challenges

     – Increase Efficiency

     – Compact Energy Storage and Compact Power Sources

     – Noise, Vibration, Leakage, Safety, and Ease of Use

     – Create Portable, Untethered, Human-Scale Applications

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    10/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 10

    Pump-Controlled vs. Valve-Controlled Systems

    • Hydraulic actuation devices may be linear (piston / cylinder)

    or rotary (motor) and these may be controlled by a pump or

    a valve, giving four basic hydraulic system combinations.

    • The pump-controlled system consists of a variable-delivery

    pump supplying fluid to an actuation device. The fluid flow

    is controlled by the stroke of the pump to vary output speed,and the pressure generated matches the load.

    • The valve-controlled system consists of a servovalve /

    proportional valve controlling the flow from a hydraulic

    power supply to an actuation device. The hydraulic powersupply is usually a constant-pressure type with two basic

    configurations.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    11/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 11

     – a constant delivery pump with a pressure relief

    valve and

     – a variable-delivery pump with a stroke control to

    regulate pressure.

    • Pump-Controlled vs. Valve-Controlled Comparison – Response Speed

    •  A pump-controlled system has slow response

    because pressures must be built up, containedvolumes are large, and the stroke servo has

    comparatively slow response.

    •  A valve-controlled system has fast response to

    valve and load inputs because containedvolumes are small and the supply pressure is

    constant.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    12/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 12

     – Efficiency

    •  A pump-controlled system is much more efficientsince both pressure and flow are closely matched to

    load requirements.

    •  A valve-controlled system is much less efficient (≈ 2/3)

    because of the constant supply pressure regardless ofload, the large pressure drop across the control valve,

    and significant leakage.

     – Size•  A pump-controlled system has a bulky power element

    which makes the application difficult if the pump is

    close coupled to the actuator.

    •  A valve-controlled system has a small and light powerelement but a bulky hydraulic power supply is

    required.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    13/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 13

     – Heat Dissipation

    •  A pump-controlled system requires an auxiliarypump and valving to provide oil for

    replenishment and cooling.

    •  A valve-controlled system has a build-up of oiltemperature because of inefficiency which

    necessitates heat exchangers to dissipate the

    wasted energy.

     – Cost and Complexity•  A pump-controlled system generally requires

    an electrohydraulic servo to stroke the pump

    which increases system cost and complexity.

    • Several valve-controlled systems can be

    powered by a single hydraulic power supply.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    14/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 14

     – A valve-controlled system has a build-up of oil

    temperature because of inefficiency whichnecessitates heat exchangers.

    • Cost and Complexity

     – A pump-controlled system generally requires anelectrohydraulic servo to stroke the pump which

    increases system cost and complexity.

     – Several valve-controlled systems can be fed from

    a single hydraulic power supply.

    • Here, we focus on a valve-controlled, linear actuation

    system, with a 4-way, 3-position valve, a single-rod,

    double-acting cylinder, and a constant-displacementpump with a pressure-relief valve.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    15/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 15

    Physical System

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    16/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 16

    Physical System Components• Single-Rod, Double-Acting Hydraulic Cylinder 

    • 4-Way, 3-Position, Solenoid-Operated,Spring-Return, Proportional Control Valve

    • Check Valve

    • Pilot-Operated Pressure Relief Valve• Fixed-Displacement Hydraulic Pump (Gear

    Pump) with Motor 

    • Transmission Lines• Option: Accumulator 

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    17/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 17

    System Description• This system is one of the most basic hydraulic control

    systems.

     – It uses a standard four-way, three-position valve tocontrol the output characteristics of a single-rod,

    double-acting linear actuator by controlling the

    volumetric flow of hydraulic fluid into and out of the

    actuator.

     – The load to be moved by the actuator is shown as a

    single mass-spring-damper system with a load-

    disturbance force. – A fixed-displacement pump provides a constant

    volumetric flow rate into the supply line to the valve.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    18/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 18

     – The pump is sized according to its volumetric

    displacement and is driven by an external powersource at an angular velocity ω.

     – The pressure in the discharge line of the pump is

    controlled using a pilot-operated pressure relief valve set at the desired supply pressure.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    19/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 19

    System Diagram Used For Analysis

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    20/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 20

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    21/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 21

    Analysis• Force Analysis

     – F = load force = dynamic term that represents the

    force of the load on the actuator 

     – m = inertia of the load; we often neglect the inertia

    of the actuator itself because it is much smaller

    than the actual forces that are generated by theactuator. This high force-to-inertia ratio is one of

    the principle advantages of using a hydraulic

    system as opposed to an electric system.

     – c = equivalent viscous damping constantrepresenting energy dissipation effects associated

    with the load and moving parts of the actuator.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    22/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 22

     – k = equivalent spring constant representingcompliance / flexibility effects associated with the

    load and moving parts of the actuator 

     – Apply Newton’s Second Law to obtain the

    equation of motion:

     – P A and PB are the fluid pressures on the A and Bsides of the actuator.

     –  ηaf  is the force efficiency of the actuator.

     – F0 is the nominal spring or bias load that is appliedto the actuator when y equals zero.

    2

    af A A B B 02

    d y dym c ky (A P A P ) F F

    dt dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    23/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 23

     – Nominal Steady-State Operating Conditions of the

    System:

    • Note that we assume that the actuator pressures P A and PB each

    come to Ps/2 at the servo rest condition.

     – The nominal force exerted on the actuator by the load isthen given as:

     – The equation of motion then becomes:

     – We see that the required inputs for adjusting the position

    of the load are P A and PB. These pressures result fromthe changing flow and volume conditions within the

    actuator itself.

    sA B

    Py 0 P P F 02

    saf A B 0

    P(A A ) F

    2

    2

    s saf A A B B2

    P Pd y dym c ky A P A P F

    dt dt 2 2

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    24/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 24

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    25/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 25

    • Background on Hydraulic Cylinders

     – The major function is to convert hydraulic power

    into linear mechanical force to perform work or

    transmit power.

     – Hydraulic power (P AQ A) is delivered to the systemthrough port A. As the piston moves to the right,

    power (PBQB) is expelled from the actuator

    through port B. Heat is lost to the atmosphere

    resulting from viscous shear and Coulomb friction.The useful output power of the linear actuator is

    Fv.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    26/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 26

     – The overall efficiency η of the linear actuator is

    defined as the ratio of the useful output power to thesupplied input power.

     – The overall efficiency η can be separated into twocomponents: the volumetric efficiency ηv and the

    force efficiency ηf .

     – In general, the volumetric efficiency will be less than

    unity owing to fluid compression and leakage past thepiston. The force efficiency will be less than unity

    owing to Coulomb friction and viscous shear.

     A A

    Fv

    P Q

     Av f v f  

     A A A

     A v FQ P A

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    27/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 27

    • Pressure Analysis

     – We assume that the pressure transients that result fromfluid compressibility are negligible.

    • This assumption is especially valid for a system

    design in which the transmission lines between the

    valve and the actuator are very short, i.e., small

    volumes of fluid exist on either side of the actuator.

    • The omission of pressure transient effects is also valid

    for systems in which the load dynamics are muchslower than the pressure dynamics themselves.

    • Since the load dynamics typically occur over a range

    of seconds and the pressure dynamics typically occur

    over a range of milliseconds, it is usually safe to

    neglect the time variation of the pressure in favor of

    the time variation of the overall systems.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    28/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 28

    • For design and operating conditions in which long

    transmission lines between the valve and theactuator are used or in which a large amount of

    entrained air is captured within the fluid causing

    the fluid bulk modulus to be reduced, it may be

    necessary to conduct a transient analysis of thepressure conditions on both sides of the actuator.

    This also may be the case if the actuator dynamics

    are very fast.

     – Under these assumptions:

     – Q A and QB are the volumetric flow rates into and out

    of the actuator, respectively, and ηav is the volumetric

    efficiency of the actuator.

     A B A B

    av av

     A dy A dyQ Q

    dt dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    29/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 29

    • Review: Conservation of Mass

     – Here we assume that all of the densities of the system (inlet

    flow, outlet flow, and control volume) are the same and equal

    to . – This assumption is justified for incompressible fluids and is

    quite accurate for compressible fluids if pressure variations

    are not too large and the temperature of flow into the control

    volume is almost equal to the temperature of the flow out ofthe control volume.

    CV CS

    CV CV CV CV net

    CVCV net

    0 dV v dAt

    0 V V Q

    V0 V Q

     

     

     

    The net rate of mass effluxthrough the control surface plus

    the rate of change of mass

    inside the control volume

    equals zero. Velocity ismeasured relative to the control

    volume.

    CV net

    V0 V P Q

    0dP P

    P dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    30/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 30

     – From the flow rates shown at the four-way spool

    valve below, we see that:

     A 2 1 B 4 3Q Q Q Q Q Q

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    31/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 31

     – The linearized flow equations for fluid passing across

    the metering lands of the four-way spool valve aregiven by:

     – Kq and Kc are the flow gain and pressure-flow

    coefficients for the valve, respectively. Kp is the

    pressure sensitivity.

    s1 c q c A r  

    s2 c q c s A

    s3 c q c s B

    s4 c q c B r  

    PQ K K x K P P

    2P

    Q K K x K P P2

    PQ K K x K P P

    2P

    Q K K x K P P2

    d

    q d

    0 0

    dc

    0 0

    q

    p

    0 0 0c

    2Q AC P

    Q A 2 AK C P

     A x x

     ACQK

    P 2 P

    KP Q / x 2P AK

    x Q / P K A x

     

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    32/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 32

     – The volumetric flow rates into and out of the

    actuator may be expressed as:

     – The return pressure Pr = 0.

     – The equations for the operating pressures on both

    sides of the linear actuator then are:

    s A q c A

    sB q c B

    PQ 2K x 2K P

    2

    PQ 2K x 2K P2

    s  A A p

    c av

    s BB p

    c av

    P  A dyP K x

    2 2K dt

    P  A dyP K x

    2 2K dt

     A A

    av

    BB

    av

     A dyQ

    dt

     A dyQ

    dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    33/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 33

     – We see that the fluid pressure on side A of the

    linear actuator is increased by moving the spool

    valve in the positive x direction and that the fluid

    pressure on side B of the actuator is decreased bythe same spool motion.

     – This adjustment in fluid pressure by motion of the

    spool valve is the mechanism for adjusting the

    output motion of the load.

     – The equation also shows a linear velocity

    dependence for the fluid pressure as well, which

    will result in favorable damping characteristics forthe system.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    34/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 34

    •  Analysis Summary

    s  A A p

    c av

    s BB p

    c av

    P  A dyP K x

    2 2K dt

    P  A dyP K x2 2K dt

    2

    s s

    af A A B B2

    P Pd y dy

    m c ky A P A P Fdt dt 2 2

    Substitution into

    Result is:

    2 2 2A B

    af A B p2

    c

    d y A A dym c ky A A K x Fdt 2K dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    35/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 35

     – In this result we have assumed that ηaf 

    /ηav ≈ 1.

     – The mechanical design of the linear actuator and

    the four-way spool has a decisive impact on the

    overall dynamics of the hydraulic control system.

     – These design parameters help to shape theeffective damping of the system and provide an

    adequate gain relationship between the input

    motion of the spool valve and the output motion of

    the load.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    36/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 36

    Design•  Actuator Design

     – We start by sizing the linear actuator in accordance with

    the expected load requirements. – Usually for a given application the working load force is

    known and can be used to determine the required

    pressurized areas that are needed within the actuator to

    develop this load for a specified working pressure.

    2

    s saf A A B B2

    P Pd y dym c ky A P A P F

    dt dt 2 2

    s saf A A B B

    P PF A P A P

    2 2

    0 =

    steady state steadyworkingforce

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    37/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 37

     – At the working force that is specified for the

    application, it is common to use fluid pressures inthe linear actuator that are less than the full supply

    pressure so as to provide a margin of excessive

    force capability for the system.

     – Typical design specifications at the working force

    conditions are:

     – Fw is the working force of the hydraulic control

    system

     – Ps is the supply pressure to the hydraulic controlvalve.

    w A s B s

    3 1F F P P P P

    4 4

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    38/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 38

     – Substitution:

     – Result is:

     – Simultaneous solution yields:

    w A s B s

    3 1F F P P P P

    4 4

    s s

    af A A B B

    P PF A P A P

    2 2

    w 0A B A B

    af s af s

    F FA A 4 A A 2

    P P

    s

    af A B 0

    P(A A ) F

    2

    into

    and

    w 0 w 0A B

    af s af s

    2F F 2F FA A

    P P

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    39/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 39

     – These results may be used to design or select a

    linear actuator that will provide a sufficient workingforce for a given supply pressure.

     – Other design considerations must also be taken

    into account when designing the linear actuator.

    • The stroke of the actuator or distance of piston

    travel must be sufficient for the application.

    • Pressure vessel stresses within the actuator

    must be acceptable.• Sealing mechanisms must be used to minimize

    both internal and external leakage.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    40/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 40

    • Valve Design

     – Once the actuator has been designed to generatethe necessary working force for the control

    application, the next step is to design a control

    valve that will provide sufficient flow and pressure

    characteristics for the linear actuator.

     – These characteristics are designed by specifying

    the appropriate flow gain Kq and pressure-flow

    coefficient Kc for the valve.

    qs  A A p p

    c av c

    s  Ac A q

    av

    KP  A dyP K x and K

    2 2K dt K

    P  A dyK P K x

    2 2 dt

    Combine:

    Result is:

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    41/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 41

     – For specifying the appropriate valve coefficients,

    usually two operating conditions are considered:

    • the steady working force condition

    • the steady no-load velocity of the actuator 

     – For both these conditions, the displacement of the

    open-centered valve is usually taken to be ¼ the

    under-lapped valve dimension u. A specified

    working valve displacement of this magnitude ishelpful because this valve keeps the valve

    operating near the vicinity of the null position

    about which the valve flow equations have been

    linearized, and it provides a margin of excessivecapability for the system design.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    42/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 42

     – Substitution:

     – Result is:

     – Similarly, we use the following parameters to

    identify the no-load velocity conditions of thehydraulic control system:

     – Where v0 is the no-load velocity that is specified

    when the load disturbance force F is zero.

    A s

    1 3 dyx u P P 0

    4 4 dt s  Ac A q

    av

    P  A dyK P K x

    2 2 dt

    c s qK P K u

    A s 0

    1 1 dyx u P P v

    4 2 dt

    s  Ac A q

    av

    P  A dyK P K x

    2 2 dt

     Aq 0

    av

    2A0 K u v

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    43/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 43

     – Simultaneous solution:

     – Results in the following specifications for the

    valve-flow gain, the pressure-flow coefficient, andthe pressure sensitivity:

     – The valve coefficients are heavily dependent on

    the shape of the flow passages that are used to

    design the valve.

    c s qK P K u A

    q 0

    av

    2A0 K u v

    and

    q A 0 A 0 sq c p

    av s av c

    K2A v 2A v PK K K

    u P K u

    dq d c

    0 0 0 0

     ACQ A 2 A QK C P K

     A x x P 2 P

     

    If rectangular flow passages are used in the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    44/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 44

     – If rectangular flow passages are used in the

    design, we can show that the flow gain and

    pressure-flow coefficients are given by:

     – Here h is the height of the rectangular flow

    passage, Cd is the discharge coefficient for the

    flow passage, and ρ is the fluid density.

     – Equate the following two expressions:

     – Result is:

    s dq d c

    s

    P uhCK hC K

    P

     

     A 0 A 0q c

    av s av

    2A v 2A vK K

    u P

    s d

    q d c

    s

    P uhCK hC K

    P

     

     A 0

    sd

    av

    2A vuh

    PC

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    45/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 45

     – If it is assumed that the under-lapped dimension of

    the open-centered valve is ¼ of the flow passageheight, the following design characteristics of the

    valve may be written:

     – It can be seen that as the actuator area A A and theno-load velocity requirement v0 become large, the

    valve size also must grow accordingly. The valve

    must be matched with the load requirements in

    order to satisfy the overall design objectives of thehydraulic control system.

     A 0

    sd

    av

     A v

    u h 4uP2C

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    46/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 46

    • Pump Design

     – Now that the linear actuator and control valvehave been designed, it is time to specify the

    hydraulic pump that will be used to power the

    hydraulic control system.

     – The pump is a fixed-displacement pump that

    produces a volumetric flow rate that is proportional

    to the angular input speed of the pump shaft ω.

     – Within the pump itself there is internal leakage thatresults in a reduction of the pump volumetric

    efficiency ηpv.

     – Let’s review some details on pump efficiency (seeslides 52-56 .)

    If we assume that the relief valve is closed the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    47/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 47

     – If we assume that the relief valve is closed, the

    supply flow to the four-way control valve is given

    by:

     – Where Vp is the volumetric displacement of the

    pump per unit of rotation, and ηpv is the volumetricefficiency of the pump.

     – The supply flow must equal the sum of the

    volumetric flow rates that are crossing metering

    lands 2 and 3 on the four-way spool valve.

    s pv pQ V

    s2 c q c s A

    s3 c q c s B

    s 2 3 c s c A B

    PQ K K x K P P

    2

    PQ K K x K P P2

    Q Q Q 3K P K P P

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    48/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 48

     – Using the following equations:

     – Substitution:

     – Result is:

    s  A A p

    c av

    s BB p

    c av

     A B

     A B s

    c av

    P  A dyP K x2 2K dt

    P  A dyP K x

    2 2K dt A A dy

    P P P2K dt

     A B A B s

    c av

     A A dyP P P

    2K dt

      s c s c A BQ 3K P K P P

     A Bs c s

    av

     A A dyQ 2K P

    2 dt

    supplied volumetricflow rate to the valve

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    49/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 49

     – Substitution:

     – Result is the expression for the requiredvolumetric flow displacement for the supply pump,

    where dy/dt has been replaced with the no-load

    velocity requirement v0 for the system.

     – The physical construction of the pump now needsto be addressed, e.g., gear pump or axial-piston

    pump.

     A Bs c s

    av

     A A dyQ 2K P

    2 dt

    s pv pQ V

     A Bc sp 0

    pv pv av

     A A2K PV v

    2

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    50/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 50

    • Input Power Design

     – The input power that is required to operate the

    hydraulic control system is given by:

     – Where η is the overall pump efficiency.

    p s

    V PPower 

    v t d

    v

    d

    Q

    V

    d d

    t

    V P

    T

    Eff

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    51/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 51

    Review: Pump Efficiency

    • The task of the hydraulic pump is to convert rotating

    mechanical shaft power into fluid power that may be

    used downstream of the pump.

    • None of the hydraulic pumps is 100% efficient. They

    all lose power in the process of converting power.

     – Fluid leaks away from the main path of powertransmission.

     – Friction exists within the machine.

    • The diagram on the next slide shows the power that

    flows in and out of a typical hydraulic pump,

    regardless of type.

    Power Flowing In and Out of The Pump

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    52/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 52

    Power Flowing In and Out of The Pump

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    53/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 53

     – Power is supplied to the pump through the rotating

    shaft by an external drive device (not shown).

     – As the shaft rotates, the pump draws fluid into the

    inlet side and pushes fluid out of the discharge side.

     – The input power to the shaft is torque times the shaftangular velocity , i.e., Tω.

     – Power is also delivered to the pump on the inlet side

    by any pressure that may exist at the intake port of

    the pump. This hydraulic power is equal to the

    pressure times the volumetric flow rate, i.e., PiQi.

     – The discharge power of the pump is equal to the

    discharge pressure times the discharge volumetricflow rate, i.e., PdQd.

    – Power also leaks away from the pump in the form of

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    54/101

    Fluid PowerDynamic System Investigation K. Craig 54

      Power also leaks away from the pump in the form of

    internal leakage. This power loss is calculated as

    PℓQℓ, where Pℓ is the pressure drop across the leakpath, and Qℓ is the leakage volumetric flow rate.

     – Finally, power also leaves the pump in the form of

    dissipating heat.• The overall pump efficiency is defined as the useful

    output power divided by the supplied input power:

    • We can use the volumetric displacement of the pump Vdto separate the overall efficiency into two components:

    the volumetric efficiency ηv and the torque efficiency ηt.

    d dP QT

    v t

    Th l t i ffi i i i b Q

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    55/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 55

    • The volumetric efficiency is given by:

     – It is used for describing power loses that result

    from internal leakage and fluid compressibility.

    • The torque efficiency is given by:

     – It is used for describing power loses that resultfrom fluid shear and internal friction.

    • The volumetric displacement Vd is given in units of

    volume per radian. The volumetric displacement per

    revolution is given by 2πVd.

    d dt

    V P

    T

    dv

    d

    Q

    V

    C St d

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    56/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 56

    Case Study

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    57/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 57

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    58/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 58

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    59/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 59

    Control

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    60/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 60

    Control

    • Position Control

     – One control objective is to accurately position the load at

    a prescribed location within the trajectory range of theactuator.

     – Typically, this control function is carried out under slowly

    moving conditions of the actuator ; therefore, the plant

    description for this control problem may neglect safely

    any transient contributions that normally would be

    significant during high-speed operations.

    2 2 2

    A Baf A B p2

    c

    d y A A dym c ky A A K x F

    dt 2K dt

    Neglect

    Using a standard PI controller the control law for

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    61/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 61

     – Using a standard PI controller, the control law for

    the displacement of the four-way spool valve is:

     – yd is the desired position of the load. – The most practical way to enforce the control law

    is to use an electrohydraulic position control of the

    four-way spool valve coupled with a

    microprocessor that is capable of readingfeedback information and generating the

    appropriate output signal for the valve actuator.

    See diagram on the next slide.

     – A block diagram for the position control system is

    also shown on the slide after that.

    e d i dx K y y K y y dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    62/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 62

    Solenoid-Actuated Two-Stage Electrohydraulic Valve

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    63/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 63

    Position Control of theFour-Way Valve-Controlled Linear Actuator

     – If we assume that the position control of the system is a

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    64/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 64

    regulation control problem, and that the load force and

    the desired position of the load yd are constants, the

    equation of motion for the closed-loop system is:

     – This is a first-order dynamic system.

     – The design objective for the position control problem is

    to shape the first-order response by designing theappropriate time constant for the system. This is

    accomplished by proper selection of the proportional and

    integral control gains.

     – NOTE: This response is based on a slowly-movingdevice. If the settling time becomes too short, higher-

    order dynamics will become significant.

    • Velocity Control

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    65/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 65

    y

     – Another common control objective is velocitycontrol. The objective is to establish a specific

    output velocity for the load based on a desired

    velocity that is prescribed by the application. This

    objective typically is carried out for load systemsthat do not include a load spring.

     – The equation of motion (with k = 0) for the

    velocity-controlled system is:

     – v is the instantaneous velocity of the load.

    2 2

    A Baf A B p

    c

    dv A Am c v A A K x F

    dt 2K  

     – For the velocity control objective, the PID

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    66/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 66

    controller will be used for the spool valve:

     – vd is the desired velocity of the load.

     – Again, the most practical way to enforce the

    control law is to use an electrohydraulic position

    control of the four-way spool valve coupled with amicroprocessor that is capable of reading

    feedback information and generating the

    appropriate output signal for the valve actuator.

     – The system block diagram for the velocity control

    is shown on the next slide.

    e d i d d dd

    x K v v K v v dt K v vdt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    67/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 67

    Velocity Control of theFour-Way Valve-Controlled Linear Actuator

     – If it is assumed that the velocity control of the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    68/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 68

    y

    system is a regulation control problem and that theload force F and the desired velocity of the load vdare constants, the equation of motion for the

    closed-loop system may be written as:

    22 2

    n n n d2

    d v dv2 v v

    dt dt

     – This is a second-order dynamic system.

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    69/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 69

     – The design objective for the velocity-controlproblem is to shape the second-order response by

    designing the appropriate undamped natural

    frequency and damping ratio for the system.

     – By making the proper selection of control gains,the undamped natural frequency and damping

    ratio for the control system may be adjusted.

    • Force Control

    Another control objective that is used for a hydraulic

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    70/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 70

     – Another control objective that is used for a hydraulic

    control system is force control.

     – Force-controlled systems usually are configured very

    much like a velocity-controlled system without a load

    spring, and when they are used, they often switchbetween velocity and force control depending on the

    immediate needs of the application.

     – Furthermore, force-controlled systems typically are

    operated in slow motion so as to gradually apply the loadforce to whatever the application is trying to resist.

     – The equation of motion is:

    2 2 2

    A Baf A B p2

    c

    d y A A dym c ky A A K x F

    dt 2K dt

    Neglect

     – Use a standard PI controller for the displacement

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    71/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 71

    of the four-way spool valve.

     – Fd

    is the desired force that is to be exerted on the

    load. In most applications, the instantaneous load

    force F is measured by sensing the fluid pressures

    in sides A and B of the linear actuator and

    calculating the load force according to thefollowing equation:

    e d i dx K F F K F F dt

    s saf A A B B

    P PF A P A P

    2 2

     – Again, the most practical way to enforce the control law

    is to use an electrohydraulic position control of the four-

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    72/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 72

    is to use an electrohydraulic position control of the four-

    way spool valve coupled with a microprocessor that is

    capable of reading feedback information and generating

    the appropriate output signal for the valve actuator.

     – A block diagram for the closed-loop control system isshown below.

     – If it is assumed that the force control of the system is a

    regulation control problem and that the desired load force

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    73/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 73

    g p

    Fd is constant, the dynamic equation for the closed-loopsystem is:

     – This is first-order dynamic system. – The design objective for the force-control problem is to

    shape the first-order response by designing the

    appropriate time constant for the system.

     – NOTE: This response is based on a slowly-moving

    device. If the settling time becomes too short, higher-

    order dynamics will become significant.

    d

    e

    i af A B p

    dFF F

    dt

    1 1K

    K A A K

    Case Study

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    74/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 74

    y

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    75/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 75

    Pump-Controlled Hydraulic Systems

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    76/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 76

    •  A pump-controlled hydraulic system uses a pump as

    opposed to a control valve for directing hydraulic power

    to and from an actuator that is used to generate useful

    output.

    • Pump-controlled hydraulic systems exhibit an efficiency

    advantage over valve-controlled systems due to the fact

    that the control valve introduces a pressure drop thatresults in significant heat dissipation.

    • The pump-controlled system does not use this valve; the

    immediate power needs of the output are met directly by

    the power source and that increases the overall

    operating efficiency of the system.

    • However, there are disadvantages of a pump-

    controlled system:

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    77/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation K. Craig 77

    y

     – The response characteristics of pump-controlled

    systems can be slower due to the longer

    transmission lines that usually are used for

    reaching the output actuator and theaccompanying fluid compressibility effects.

     – To eliminate long transmission lines, often times

    the pump, actuator, and power source are too

    bulky to be collocated.

     – Pump-controlled systems consist of a single pump

    that operates a single actuator . Multiple actuators

    cannot share the power that is generated fromone pump, so the pump cost must be included

    with the overall cost of a single actuator.

    • In pump-control of a linear actuator, since the pump

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    78/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 78

    operates symmetrically as it sends flow to andreceives flow from the output actuator, only double-

    rod linear actuators are suitable.

    • Typical applications for these systems include

    industrial robots and flight-surface controls in the

    aerospace industry.

    • Pump-controlled rotary actuators, used to drive a

    rotating shaft, are often called hydrostatictransmissions. They are frequently used for lawn

    tractors, off-highway earth-moving equipment, and as

    a constant-speed drive for various aerospace flight

    applications.

    Fixed-Displacement Pump Control of a

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    79/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 79

    Linear Actuator

    speed controlleddouble-acting

    F = load disturbance force

    Vp = volumetric displacement per unit of rotation

    • Comments: – Speed-controlled (driven by an input shaft rotating at a

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    80/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 80

    variable angular velocity ω) fixed-displacement pumpwith volumetric displacement per unit of rotation Vd

     – Double-rod linear actuator to facilitate symmetric action

    of the actuator  – Pressurized areas are the same on both sides of the

    actuator 

     – Load is a single mass-spring-damper system with a load-

    disturbance force

     – Rod connects the load to the actuator piston

     – Volumetric flow of hydraulic fluid into the actuator is

    controlled by the output flow of the pump – For positive ω, pump flow is to side A of the actuator; the

    load moves down and flow exits the actuator from side B

     – For negative ω, pump flow is to side B of the

    actuator; the load moves up and flow exits the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    81/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 81

    actuator from side A – Q A and QB are the volumetric flow rates into and

    out of the actuator 

     – Shuttle Valve• Connects the low-pressure side of the hydraulic

    control system to the reservoir 

    • It keeps the low-pressure side of the circuit at a

    constant reservoir pressure, i.e., zero gage

    pressure

    • It keeps the fixed-displacement pump from

    drawing a vacuum and causing fluid cavitation• It allows for the return flow to be cooled by a

    low-pressure radiator (not shown)

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    82/101

    • Analysis

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    83/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 83

     – Load Analysis

    •  ηaf  is the force efficiency of the actuator 

     – Pressure Analysis

    •  Assume that the pressure transients that resultfrom fluid compressibility in the transmission

    lines are negligible. This assumption is

    especially valid for a system design in which

    the transmission lines between the valve andactuator are very short, i.e., small volumes of

    fluid exist on either side of the actuator.

    af A Bmy cy ky A(P P ) F

    af 

     A A

    F

    P A

    • The omission of pressure transient effects is

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    84/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 84

    also valid for systems in which the loaddynamics are much slower (seconds) than the

    pressure dynamics (milliseconds) themselves.

    • If there are long transmission lines between the

    valve and actuator, or if the bulk modulus isreduced because of entrained air in the fluid, or

    if the actuator dynamics are very fast, a

    transient analysis of the pressure conditions on

    both sides of the actuator may be necessary.

    • Here, we assume that pressure transients may

    be safely neglected.

    • Therefore  Aav

     Ay

    Q  

    ηav = actuator volumetric efficiency

    • From the diagram we see that for an

    incompressible fluid:

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    85/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 85

    • The supply flow is given by:

    • Combining equations results in:

    • The shuttle valve is used to connect the low-

    pressure side of the hydraulic circuit to thereservoir. The pressure on side B of the

    actuator is therefore 0 gage pressure.

     A s AQ Q KP

    s pv pQ V

    ηpv = pump volumetric efficiency

    pv p A

    av

    V  AP yK K

     

    pv p

     A

    V  AP y

     

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    86/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 86

    • This equation shows a pump velocity and an

    actuator velocity dependence for the fluid

    pressure in side A. An adjustment of the pumpvelocity term will provide a control input to the

    dynamic load equation. The linear velocity

    term will be useful in providing favorable

    damping characteristics.

    • Analysis Summary

    2

    af pv paf 

    av

    V A Amy c y ky FK K

    avK K

     – We see that the mechanical design of the linear

    t t d th l t i di l t f th

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    87/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 87

    actuator and the volumetric displacement of thepump have a decisive impact on the overall

    dynamics of the hydraulic control system. The

    design parameters help to shape the effective

    damping of the system and provide an adequategain relationship between the input velocity of the

    pump and the output motion of the load.

    Design

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    88/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 88

    • Actuator Design – We start the mechanical design of the hydraulic

    control system by sizing the linear actuator inaccordance with the expected load requirements.

     – We usually know the maximum working load and

    maximum working pressure. Use these two

    quantities along with the steady-state form of theload equation:

    af A B

    af A B

    my cy ky A(P P ) F

    reduces to: F A(P P )

     – Since there is no pressure drop between the pump

    d t t th fl id id A f th

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    89/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 89

    and actuator, the fluid pressure on side A of thelinear actuator is the full supply pressure.

     – Here Fw is the working force of the hydraulic

    control system, and Ps is the supply pressure at

    the working condition.

     – Therefore, after substitution, the equation forsizing the pressurized area of the linear actuator

    is:

     – Other design considerations include the stroke of

    the actuator or distance of piston travel.

    w a s BF F P P P 0

    w

    af s

    F A

    P

    • Pump Design

    The p mp is a fi ed displacement p mp that

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    90/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 90

     – The pump is a fixed-displacement pump thatproduces a volumetric flow rate that is proportional

    to the angular input speed of the pump shaft ω.

     – In order to size the required volumetric

    displacement of the pump, it is common to specifya no-load velocity v0 requirement for the linear

    actuator and to size the pump in such a way as to

    achieve this velocity requirement.

     – Set P A equal to zero for the no-load case,

    efficiencies equal to unity, and ω equal to the

    maximum pump speed. Then the equation below

    becomes:pv p 0

     A p

    av

    V  Av AP y V

    K K

     – The pump may be any positive-displacement

    pump that satisfies the volumetric displacement

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    91/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 91

    pump that satisfies the volumetric displacementrequirement.

     – Usually the pump construction type is selected

    based on the required supply pressure of the

    system and the desired operating efficiency of thepump.

    • Input Power Design

    The input power that is required to operate the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    92/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 92

     – The input power that is required to operate thehydraulic control system is given by the standard

    power equation:

     –  ηp is the overall efficiency of the pump given by

    the product of the volumetric and torque efficiencyvalues: ηp = ηptηpv. Ps and ω are the

    instantaneous pressure and operating speed of

    the pump. Use the maximum combination of

    operating speed and pressure encountered in the

    application.

    p s

    p

    V PPower 

    Control

    P l

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    93/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System InvestigationK. Craig 93

    • Position Control – The control objective is to position the load

    accurately at a prescribed location within the

    trajectory range of the actuator.

     – Typically, this control function is carried out under

    slowly moving conditions of the actuator.

     – The plant description may safely neglect anytransient contributions that normally would be

    significant during high-speed operations.

    2af pv paf 

    av

    V A Amy c y ky FK K

    Neglect

     – Use a standard PI controller:

    e d i dK y y K y y dt

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    94/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 94

     – The closed-loop system equation of motion is:

    e d i dK y y K y y dt

    d e

    i af pv p

    1 kKy y y K

    K AV

    • Velocity Control – Another possible control objective for the system

    is velocity control The objective seeks to

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    95/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 95

    is velocity control. The objective seeks to

    establish a specific output velocity for the load

    based on a desired velocity. This objective is

    carried out for load systems that do not include aload spring. Therefore set k = 0.

    2af pv paf 

    av

    V A A

    my c y ky FK K

    Neglect

    2

    af pv paf 

    av

    V A Amv c v FK K

     – Use a standard PID controller:

    dK K dt K

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    96/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 96

    e d i d d ddK v v K v v dt K v vdt

     – The closed-loop system equation of motion is:

    2 2v 2 v v y

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    97/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 97

    2 2

    n n n d

    2af av paf 

    e

    avin

    af av pd d n

    af pv p

    v 2 v v y

     AV Ac K

    K KKmK  AV

    K 2 m K AV K

     

    • Force Control – Another control objective that is occasionally used

    for the hydraulic control system is that of force

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    98/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 98

    for the hydraulic control system is that of force

    control.

     – Force-controlled systems are usually configured

    very much like a velocity-controlled system withouta load spring, and when they are used, they often

    switch between velocity and force control

    depending on the immediate needs of the

    application.

     – Furthermore, force-controlled systems typically

    are operated in slow motion so as to apply the

    load force gradually to the object that theapplication is trying to resist.

     – Under these slow-motion conditions, the load

    inertia and viscous damping effects may be

    ignored safely without sacrificing accuracy in the

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    99/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 99

    ignored safely without sacrificing accuracy in the

    modeling process.

     – Us a standard PI controller.

    2af pv paf 

    av

    V A Amy c y ky F

    K K

    Neglect

    e d i dK y y K y y dt

     – In most applications, the instantaneous load force

    F is measured by sensing the fluid pressures insides A and B of the linear actuator and

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    100/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 100

    s easu ed by se s g e u d p essu essides A and B of the linear actuator and

    calculating the load force.

    af A B

    F A(P P )

     – The closed-loop system equations of motion is:

    1 KF F F K

  • 8/19/2019 Fluid Power System Investigation Case Study

    101/101

    Fluid Power

    Dynamic System Investigation

    K. Craig 101

    • Summary – We have considered 3 control objectives: position,

    velocity, and force control.

     – For position and force control, an important slow-

    speed assumption has been employed. Under

    high-speed conditions, higher-order dynamics maymanifest and may produce an undesirable result.

    d e

    i af pv p

    1 KF F F K

    K AV