fiu design report - 2012(1)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
1/128
EML 4905 Senior Design Project
A B.S. THESISPREPARED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OFBACHELOR OF SCIENCE
INMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
SHELL ECO-MARATHON
100 % of Final Report
Bryand AcostaMarco BetancourtFernando Pinheiro
Advisor: Professor Igor Tsukanov
February 20, 2012
This B.S. thesis is written in partial fulfillment of the requirements in EML4905. The contents represent the opinion of the authors and not the
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
2/128
2
Ethics Statement and Signatures
The work submitted in this B.S. thesis is solely prepared by a team consisting of MarcoBetancourt, Bryand Acosta, and Fernando Pinheiro and it is original. Excerpts from
others work have been clearly identified, their work acknowledged within the text andlisted in the list of references. All of the engineering drawings, computer programs,formulations, design work, prototype development and testing reported in this documentare also original and prepared by the same team of students.
Marco BetancourtTeam Leader
Bryand AcostaTeam Member
Fernando PinheiroTeam Member
Dr. Igor TsukanovFaculty Advisor
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
3/128
3
Table of Contents
LIST OF FIGURES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #
LIST OF TABLES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $
ABSTRACT """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %
1 INTRODUCTION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" &
1.1PROBLEM STATEMENT """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""#1.2MOTIVATION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""#1.3LITERATURE SURVEY"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $$
!"#"! %&'()*+,-. %&/(,0&1&.+2 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !!
!"#"3 4-15&+,+-0 622&221&.+ """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !!
1.3.3 Background Theory""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !7
$"%&'()*' '+*,-.-& """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /0
2. DESIGN ALTERNATIVES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" '%
2.1OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /12.2PROPOSED DESIGN ALTERNATIVES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /#
2.2.1 Engine """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 38
2.2.2 Clutch and Transmission """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #7
2.2.3 Fuel Delivery System"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9:2.2.4 Fuel"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 93
2.2.5 Starter""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9#
2.2.6 Electrical System """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9#
2.2.7 Tires """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 99
2.2.8 Frame"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9;
2.2.9 Steering system"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
4/128
4
:"0
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
5/128
5
List of FiguresFigure 1 - Evo Supermileage"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #$Figure 2 - Alerion Supermileage""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #%Figure 3 - Project Infinity""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #%Figure 4 - Univ of Malaysia"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #&
Figure 5 - Eco Illini""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #'Figure 6 - Team Green"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #'Figure 7 - Ecolancers"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #(Figure 8 Distribution of energy in a vehicle"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $)*+,-./ 0 1 2.3, 45 6/789+:; """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %%*+,-./ #) 1 ?,+?/ @8A 6+/= """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %(*+,-./ #$ 1 >?,+?/ 5+B/ 4+/= """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %(*+,-./ #% 1 >?,+?/ 8? C:3?B """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %D*+,-./ #& 1
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
6/128
6
*+,-./ &( 1
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
7/128
7
List of Tables@3U7/ # 1 [+5: 8M A3.3L/:/.5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %)@3U7/ $ 1 >?/.,; 3?B A8=/. 9379-73:+8?5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %$Table 3 - Engine selection""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %&@3U7/ & 1 >WA/9:/B >WA/?5/5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" D#
@3U7/ ' 1 K-../?: >WA/?5/5 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" D$
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
8/128
8
Abstract
The main objective of this project is to design a fuel-efficient car prototype moved by an
internal combustion engine to participate in the 2013 Shell Eco Marathon in Houston,
Texas during the dates of March 29th- April 1st. Panther Killer used Panther Rage G2
and Panther Rage cars as reference but a new car was build from scratch envisioning an
efficient transition to the internal combustion category of the competition. Abiding by the
extensive rules and regulations of the competition, our group modeled, manufactured and
tested a vehicle with optimum aerodynamics, minimum weight and reasonable budget
that fit the realistic guidelines of the project.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
9/128
9
1 Introduction
1.1 Problem StatementOne of the main concerns of our generation is the gradual increase of the earths
temperature, in other words, the phenomenon called Global Warming. This constant
elevation of the earths thermometers could lead to catastrophic results in a matter of
decades, such as the melting of the poles, disappearing of islands and extinction of races.
The biggest catalyst to this phenomenon is the emission of greenhouse gases. Greenhouse
gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are mainly generated due to the combustion
of fossil fuels, one of them being oil that moves our cars. The accumulation of those
gases in the layers of the atmosphere is called the greenhouse effect.
Keeping in mind the threats our environment is currently under, Shell created a
few decades ago the Shell Eco-Marathon competition, challenging students to not only
look for other alternatives of energy but also, to improve and optimize the ones that can
be found today. Even though our government invests over $51 billion dollars per year in
renewable energiesi
, over 80% of the energy we use in the world today, still comes from
fossil fuels against 9% from renewable sources. Therefore, keeping in mind oil will still
be the main source of energy for our cars in the near future; the Shell Eco-Marathon has
helped students to explore ways to improve mileage per gallon in such vehicles. ii
1.2 Motivation
The project was first introduced to the group by one of the teams members,
Bryand Acosta. Bryand, who had contacted members that were part of Panther Rage G2
team in the previous year, saw a great opportunity in this project to keep the tradition at
Florida International University (FIU) of participating and representing the school in this
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
10/128
10
internationally recognized competition. Last years team had nothing but great feedback
to give to Panther Killer, and after surpassing their own expectations in the
competition, they highly recommended the experience for the present team.
Made up of members that had previously few or no hands on experience with
the concepts learned throughout our engineering courses at FIU, our team was
immediately attracted by the chance of building a car prototype. This project involves
basic concepts of real sized cars such as design of a chassis, a body, steering and braking
systems and most importantly putting it all to work with an engine. Combining these
elements with the challenges of reducing weight, increasing aerodynamics and respectingthe rules of the competition, this years team saw in the Eco Shell Marathon the perfect
components to fulfill the requirements of Senior Design Project.
Panther Killer has utilized concepts learned not only in the classroom but also in
computer programs, such as Solid Works and CAD, which were essential in order to
make some of the simulations of the car.
Last, the team that is representing FIU this time around, is looking forward to
travel to a different state and network with students from different countries and
exchanging ideas and different concepts that are utilized in the engineering world. The
team sees the competition as a rewarding experience for all the months of hard work put
into it.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
11/128
11
1.3 Literature Survey
This survey has the purpose of letting the team members become informed on the
theory behind the basic functionality and operation of the different components and
systems that come together to make an automobile. Furthermore this survey will extend
into assessing the technologies used by the top ranking competitors in the Shell Eco-
Marathon over the years.
*+,+* -./0123456 -.7048.9.63:
Shell provides access to a comprehensive publication of all the rules and
regulations of each years competition, the team will have to constantly reference this
book to make sure every design requirement is met before manufacturing can take place.
A copy of this rulebook is not provided within the body of this document so as not to
dilute its content, but is available in appendix A.
*+,+; '59
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
12/128
12
Figure 1 - Evo Supermileage
Results:
673km/L
Body:
Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels
Engine:
modified briggs &Stratton engine with custom overhead cams and valves, 47cc of
displacement, 13.7:1 compression ratio, sequential electronic fuel injection with
programmable ECU and electric starter.
Transmission:
Centrifugal clutch, single gear ratio 10:1, with replaceable gears to vary from 9:1 to 13:1
Vehicle Weight:
47kg
Cost:
50000$ Canadian dollars and 8000 hours of fabrication
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
13/128
13
Alerion Supermileage
Figure 2 - Alerion Supermileage
Results:
1347km/L
Body:
Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels
Vehicle Weight:
94lb
Project Infinity
Figure 3 - Project Infinity
Results:
1347km/L
http://www.mecano.gme.usherbrooke.ca/~supermileage/images/Fils5.jpg -
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
14/128
14
Body:
Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels
Wheels:
Michelin 44-406
University of Science of Malaysia
Figure 4 - Univ of Malaysia
Body:
Aluminum frame on composite honeycomb sandwich for the floor pan
Wheels:
Custom made hubs for ceramic angular contact bearings, as replacement for OEM wheel
hub
Results:
Could not finish race because the car could not travel up a steep slope for lack of a lower
gear ratio
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
15/128
15
Eco Illini
Figure 5 - Eco Illini
Body:
Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels
Engine:
Saito 57cc 2 cylinder boxer engine for hobby aircraft, with custom throttle body for
electronic fuel injection, with Megasquirt 3 ECU, and electric start
Transmission:
Single reduction transmission with a 451c wheel size sprocket
Team Green
Figure 6 - Team Green
Results:
6603 mpg
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
16/128
16
Body:
Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels
Engine:
34cc single cylinder engine customized with 2 sparkplugs, variable inlet valve timing and
fuel injection with an engine management system provided by General Engine
Management Systems Ltd
Transmission:
Centrifugal Clutch
Wheels:20in modified BMX style bicycle wheels with Michelin low rolling resistance tires, and
custom hubs.
Weight:
42kg
Ecolancers
Figure 7 - Ecolancers
Results:
318 mpg
Body:
Aluminum structure with sheet metal body and 3 wheels
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
17/128
17
Engine:
GXH Honda 49cc single cylinder engine with fuel delivery via carburetor
Transmission:
Extreme Duty Centrifugal Clutch coupled with a single gear 12:1 reduction as large as
the wheel itself
Wheels:
Bicycle wheels with Michelin low rolling resistance tires.
Weight:
42kg
1.3.3 Background Theory
Engine Efficiency
Competition guidelines state that every internal combustion engine used to compete must
use a four-stroke cycle to produce power.
In theory the internal combustion engine efficiency is limited to that of the Carnot-cycle
The efficiency for a Thermodynamically reversible Carnot cycle engine is given by the
equation:
where: is the efficiency
TC is the absolute temperature in the cold heat reservoir
THis the absolute temperature in the hot heat reservoir
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
18/128
18
The Carnot Cycle theorem states that:
An engine operating between two heat reservoirs can not be more efficient than a
Carnot engine operating between these same reservoirs.iii
The temperature of the cold reservoir is given by the ambient temperature outside the
engine, which should be between 15C and 25C during the month of April in Houston,
Texas.ivOn the other hand the maximum temperature that could be achieved would be
limited by the metallurgic properties of the engine and this temperature is also referred to
as the adiabatic flame temperature, which is itself a function of the products of
combustion used. The adiabatic flame temperature is both difficult to quantify in practice
and theoretically due to hysteresis in temperature sensors and due to the fact that
incomplete combustion will change the molar ratio of products of combustion being
produced.
Furthermore the engine of choice for this competition has to be a four stroke, which
makes it an Otto cycle engine for which the efficiency equation is given by
where: r is the compression ratio
is the specific heat ratio
The compression ratio is specific to the engine design and higher values increase the
engine efficiency, yet it is limited by the fact that higher ratios may cause the combustion
in the cylinder to occur prematurely, this is a phenomenon called engine knock and it will
adversely affect engine efficiency and life expectancy. Engine efficiency is in most part a
function of this value since for air/fuel mixtures is usually taken to be 1.4, but it is
important to note that this value rises with increasing temperature.vThis equation gives
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
19/128
19
the thermal efficiency of the engine, which is the heat energy it can actually extract from
the products of combustion to transform into mechanical work.
Non the less the efficiencies that can be derived from the above equations far exceed the
real world efficiency measured from a real world engine which initially has an inefficient
combustion, and then has to overcome friction, aerodynamic drag of gases inside the
engine, parasitic losses from accessories, alternators and pumps, poor valve timing
causing vacuums during the intake stroke or pressure loss during compression and
expansion, all this while loosing heat through the cylinder walls. This real worldefficiency is termed the brake specific fuel consumption and is the ratio between the fuel
consumed and power produced, and it is measured in
Where: r is the rate of fuel consumed in g/s
is the torque produced by the engine in NewtonMeters
is the engine speed in radians/second
Note that by knowing the energy density of the fuel in terms of its mass it is possible to
calculate how much energy is actually stored in that fuel in order to get a number in terms
of strict energy efficiency.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
20/128
20
Vehicle Efficiency
Figure 8 Distribution of energy in a vehicle
The energy that the engine can convert to mechanical work is limited by its thermal
efficiency and the mechanical losses inside the engine, but not all the energy produced by
the engine is available to energize the transmission, there are also parasitic losses that
arise from using energy from the engine to pump fluids throughout the vehicle and create
electricity in order to power the cars electrical system.
The powertrain efficiency is given by the product of the efficiencies of all mechanical
components starting at the engine and ending at the wheels axle. For our design this
includes the engines thermodynamic efficiency, its mechanical efficiency, and that of the
transmission plus the parasitic losses. It can also be calculated as the ratio between the
powertrain output, and the power associated with the fuel consumption rate.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
21/128
21
After all this losses the power that is available at the wheels also has to overcome
aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance forces, and the weight of the vehicle unless the
surface is perfectly flat, together this make up the forces required for the vehicle to
maintain a given speed, any power available at the wheels, in excess of this will be
available for acceleration
Steering System
Defining the steering of our car was a challenging task and one that required plenty oftime and attention since this component is so crucial to the performance of any fuel-
efficient vehicle. The steering is a key component for a few different reasons. First, it
places the wheels in a manner that will reduce the rolling resistance force of the overall
car. Also, this is the most important component of driver interface and must allow the
pilot to perform the task in an efficient manner and most importantly, having a reliable
steering will play a major role in the drivers safety.
The first question that our group asked was weather we would opt for front wheel or back
wheel steering. Since our engine is directly connected to the back tire, which is heavier
and thicker for being an original scooter slick tire, we immediately discarded the option
of rear steering. Once we had decided the steering would go on the front two wheels, we
still had to analyze several different options available in the marker in order to find the
most cost efficient one.
Immediately after starting our literature survey, we considered having a hydraulic
breaking system (mainly because it is the one recommended by the organizers of the
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
22/128
22
competition). The hydraulic was certainly a reliable one, however, our team did not find
this option cost/weight efficient since it would require an extra system to pump the liquid
necessary to make the calipers function. Therefore, we withdrew this option as well. The
following steering option that caught our attention was steering by wire. This is by far the
most weight efficient technique since steering mechanism is replaced by electronic
control. At first, this sounded like a great option since removing all the usual components
of a mechanical system would reduce the vehicles weight. Unfortunately, this method
also had its downsides. First the amount of electricity to be provided by a battery to make
the system work would require a battery that physically did not fit our car. Second,previous groups that performed tests with this kind of system proved a slow response to
the drivers commands and it was unreliable. Since we did not have the resources to buy
the system and test it ourselves, we trusted previous competitors assessments and opted
for something more efficient. Our last frustrated attempt was to make a custom made
system similar to last years, which resembled a pulley system to turn the spindles. Since
our teams concept design envisions to provide steering in only one hand, rather than both,
this option was forgotten.
Finally, our group opted for a mechanical system. We evaluated different designs that
were inspired in go-karts. The problem we encountered in this case was the availability of
products that could be purchased online to match wheels. Most specifically, the diameter
of the spindle axles were too thick to fit in any bicycle wheels that we could purchase.
We had the option of manufacturing our own parts but that would require time and some
resources that were not easily available to us. Therefore, we finally found something that
would be perfect to our design; we decided to go with a steering system extremely similar
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
23/128
23
to recumbent bikes and tadpole trikes. All the details about the selected steering will be
explained on the proposed design section of the report.
Wheels
Wheel selection to our car came almost simultaneously with the steering system since we
needed to find a hub that would comply with the diameter of the spindle axle. As briefly
mentioned above, our team spent countless hours looking for the perfect combination of
wheels and bearings to our car. In order to find that, the following parameters were taken
into account:
The wheel must have optimal aerodynamics to minimize energy loss
It had to fit our Michelin ultra low resistance tires (20 x 1.75)
Made of lightweight material
Strong enough to sustain loads and keep the tires in the correct place
First we had to consider the option of having wheels with spokes against disk wheels.
Unfortunately, due to the limited resources available to our team, manufacturing our own
disk wheels had to be taken out of question, so we agreed on purchasing a pair of wheels
already available in the market. It is important to remember that the back tire wheel was
part of a package that was purchased with the engine and therefore, those decisions
would only affect the front two. The previous two teams at FIU had used bicycle wheels,
which are a viable option for the job especially cost-wise. Our team could not proceed
with the same choice since the diameter of the axle of bicycle wheels was extremely
small for our steering ideas. It was possible to get those custom made; however the price
and the difficulty of incorporating a braking system to it forced our team to move on to a
different option. Finally, we found the option of recumbent bikes and tadpole trikes,
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
24/128
24
which use a wheel with the specifications, that we needed and meets all the criteria
described in the bullet points above.
Another important decision relating to the wheels used in the car were the wheel
bearings. Even though the drag produced by those is relatively small when compared to
the ones produced by the tires, it helps to select the correct bearings in order to optimize
your vehicles result. Since the vehicle will run at low speed and will yield a relatively
low amount of loads, ball bearings seem to be the most viable option due to smaller
frictional moment. Also, using ceramic bearings rather than steel would be beneficial
since it reduces the overall weight and friction.
Improving Vehicle Efficiency
Since the thermodynamic efficiency is dictated by the engines compression ratio it is
ideal to have higher values of such, but for any given fuel there exists a limit to which
this compression can be achieved without self-igniting the air/fuel mix prematurely,
which is known as engine knock, different types and grades of fuel have distinct anti-
knock characteristics.
It is important to also note that internal combustion engines are most efficient at a certain
operational speed that is particular to each engine, with small engines having particularly
high values for such ranging around 5000RPM to 7000RPM. Furthermore, the
relationship between the engines operating RPM and the power/torque output is not
linear, and there exists a point where the engine operates at maximum efficiency.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
25/128
25
Keeping the engine operating at this speed thus provides better power output
characteristics.
Being able to control how much fuel is fed to the engine for each combustion cycle will
directly contribute to fuel economy by being able to provide the exact amount of fuel to
keep combustion occurring at the proper stoichiometric ratio or in a lean-burn regime
where there is a slight excess of air over which is required to maintain stoichiometry.
This fine degree of control can be achieved by implementing fuel injection controlled by
an onboard computer for the engine named an electronic control unit, or ECU, that makesdecisions based on its programming and input from different sensors that relay
information about the engine timing, and the oxygen content of the intake and exhaust.
Further efficiency can be gained by the use of bearings that produce less friction within
the engine and in the hubs of free rolling wheels. Reducing or eliminating the electrical
and fluid pumping loads on the engine can further cut parasitic losses. Reducing the mass
of the vehicle offers a great advantage not only because it lowers the kinetic energy of the
vehicle at any given speed and it offers an especially significant advantage when driving
on an incline. Minimizing the effects of wind resistance, using low rolling resistance tires
and avoiding drag due to the vehicles braking systems, can further reduce the drag forces
acting against the vehicles motion.
Finally it is crucial to understand that it is the driver and the driving style implemented
that ultimately define the fuel economy that the vehicle will actually achieve, and it is
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
26/128
26
important to train the driver in the implementation of highly efficient driving methods.
The most common method implemented in the competition is the drive-and-glide method
where the driver accelerates the car to 20MPH, he then shuts off the engine, and allows
the car to coast down to a speed of 10MPH, at which point the engine is restarted and
accelerated again, this is all keeping in mind that the average velocity during the
competition must remain above 15MPH.
*+= >15?21 @.28646/
This project would not have been possible without the teams effort to engineer
587-:+8?5 \8. A.89-./ :N/L] U35/B 8? 98?9/A:5^ +B/35^ 3?B 3AA7+93:+8?5 :N3: =/ =/./ ?8:
M3L+7+3. =+:N =N/? =/ 9N85/ :8 U/,+? :N+5 /?B/348._ 8-. :/9N?+937 F?8=7/B,/ 3U8-:
4/N+97/ 5;5:/L5 =35 4/.; 7+L+:/B^ 35 =/77 35 8-. /WA/.+/?9/ +? L3?-M39:-.+?, 3?B
M3U.+93:+8?"
2-.+?, :N/ A.8I/9: 98?9/A:+8? 8-. +B/35 N3B :8 -?B/.,8 98?5:3?: ./4+5+8? U35/B 8?
?/=7; 39`-+./B F?8=7/B,/^ 3?B :N+5 :./?B 98?:+?-/B :N.8-,N8-: L3?-M39:-.+?, 35 =/
?8:+9/B :N3: 58L/ 8M 8-. +B/35 98-7B +?:/.M/./ =+:N 8:N/.5" [88F+?, M8. +B/35 +? :N/ =8.7B
3.8-?B -5^ 3?B :N3?F5 :8 :N/ H?:/.?/:^ =/ =/./ 3U7/ :8 /WA/B+:/ :N+5 A.89/55 3?B 3..+4/ :8
58-?B B/5+,?5"
H: =35 3 4/.; +?:/./5:+?, /W/.9+5/ :8 7/3.? 3U8-: ?/= A3.:5^ :8875^ 3?B :/9N?+`-/5
=/ =/./ ?8: M3L+7+3. =+:N" C8L/:+L/5 =/ 93? -?B/.5:3?B :N3: =/ ?//B 58L/:N+?, +?
8.B/. :8 B/4/7op a function, but closer inspection reveals that those specialized parts,
3?B :8875 39:-377; N34/ 3 ?3L/^ 3?B ;8- 93? M+?B :N/L 58L/=N/./ A.8U3U7; M8. 7/55
/WA/?5/ :N3: +: =8-7B N34/ :3F/? :N/ :/3L :8 B/4/78A +:" @N+5 =35 4/.; +LA8.:3?: U/93-5/
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
27/128
27
=/ L3B/ +: 3 A8+?: :8 :.; :8 U-+7B :N/ 4/N+97/ M.8L 35 L3?; 5:3?B3.B+a/B A3.:5 35 =/ 98-7B
A855+U7; M+?B"
@N+5 A.8I/9: :3-,N: -5 :N3: :N/ B/4+7 +5 +? :N/ B/:3+75 +? 3 A.8I/9: 8M :N+5 5937/" C+?9/
5/4/.37 5;5:/L5 N3B :8 98L/ :8,/:N/. 3?B =8.F +? -?+58?^ :N/; M+.5: L-5: 3758 =8.F
A/.M/9:7; U; :N/L5/74/5^ 3?B 3998LA7+5N+?, :N+5 +5 ?8: 37=3;5 35 5:.3+,N:M8.=3.B 35 8?9/
+L3,+?/B U; :N/ /?,+?//.^ :N/ B/4+7 :.-7; +5 +? :N/ B/:3+75"
E/98L+?, 39`-3+?:/B =+:N /W+5:+?, 3AA7+93:+8?5 =35 3758 3 ,8B5/?B^ /5A/9+377;
=N/? =/ U/93L/ M3L+7+3. =+:N :N/ 98?9/A: 8M ./9-LU/?: :.+9;97/5^ 5+?9/ :N+5 N/7A/B :N/
:/3L B/4/78A :N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L +? 3 L-9N L8./ /MM/9:+4/ =3; :N3: =/ =8-7B N34/ U//?
3U7/ :8 /?,+?//. 8:N/.=+5/^ U35/B 8? :N/ :/LA8.37 98?5:.3+?:5 +LA85/B"
[/3.?+?, 3U8-: /?,+?/5 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ :/W:U88F =35 :.-7; 9N377/?,+?,^ 5A/9+M+9377;
=+:N 3 KN+?/5/ 5988:/. /?,+?/ 7+F/ :N/ 8?/ =/ N3B^ 3?B :N/ =3; :N/; 3./ 5-AA85/B :8 U/
=+./B =N+9N 5//L5 :8 U/ 3? +?:/.?/:1L;5:/.; 8M +:5 8=?^ 5+?9/ :N/./ U3./7; 3./ 3?;
B+3,.3L5 :8 3998LA3?; :N/L_ 3BB+?, 3 M-/7 +?I/9:+8? 5;5:/L I-5: F/A: 3BB+?, :8 :N/
98LA7/W+:;
2/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; =35 3 B3-?:+?, :35F 8? +:5 8=?^ :.;+?, :8 M+,-./ 8-: =N3: +:5
B+L/?5+8?5 N3B :8 U/ =+:N8-: N34+?, M+?+5N/B 4/.5+8?5 8M :N/ 98LA8?/?:5 +? +:5 +?:/.+8.
=35 ?/3.7; +LA855+U7/ =+:N8-: .+5F+?, N34+?, 97/3.3?9/5 /?B+?, -A :88 78=^ 5A/9+377;
5+?9/ B8=?5+a+?, =35 37=3;5 3 ,837 +? :N/ B/5+,? A.89/55^ /4/? +M =/ N3B M-77
-?B/.5:3?B+?, 8M =N3: :N/ 4/N+97/ 3/.8B;?3L+95 5N8-7B U/ 7+F/"
*-.:N/.L8./ 9N885+?, 3?B +LA7/L/?:+?, :N/ +B/37 L3?-M39:-.+?, L/:N8B5 :8 F//A
985:5 78= =N+7/ L3W+L+a+?, L3:/.+37 A.8A/.:+/5 3?B 3AA/3.3?9/ 3AA/37 L/3?: =/ N3B :8
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
28/128
28
U/98L/ 39`-3+?:/B =+:N 3B43?9/B 98LA85+:/ L3?-M39:-.+?, :/9N?+`-/5^ 3?B 9N885/ :N/
+B/37 L3:/.+375 :N3: =8-7B M39+7+:3:/ :N+5 A.89/55"
@N+5 A.8I/9: N35 39N+/4/B :N/ ,837 8M ,.3?:+?, 8-. :/3L 3 ,78U37 7/3.?+?,
/WA/.+/?9/^ :N3: L3B/ -5 +LA7/L/?: L3?; 8M :N/ 5F+775 =/ N34/ U//? /WA85/B :8 35
engineering students, while forcing us to go beyond the classrooms scope and into real
7+M/ 3AA7+93:+8?5^ =N+9N ?8: 8?7; +?97-B/ /?,+?//.+?, B/4/78AL/?:^ 3?B A3.: 58-.9+?,^ U-:
3758 /W:/?B :8 M+?3?9+?,^ :+L/ L3?3,/L/?:^ 3?B A/.58?37 +?:/.39:+8?5 =+:N 5-AA7+/.5^
5-A/.+8.5^ 3?B :/3L L/LU/.5^ :8 ?3L/ 3 M/="
2. Design Alternatives
2.1 Overview of conceptual design
Weight:
The target weight of our vehicle is less than 100 lbs, with a 150lb being a worst possible
case scenario
Body:
The body and frame should combine to make a sturdy and structurally safe aerodynamic
shell. Its construction must consist of a mixture of lightweight materials that can be
shaped into complex parts: plastic sheets, aluminum, carbon, and glass-reinforced plastics
are being considered. Rigidity and strength would be achieved by using honeycomb cores
or tubular frame structures.
Engine:
Must be a small and fuel efficient engine under 50cc
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
29/128
29
Fuel Delivery System:
Electronic fuel injection is preferred over carburetion to achieve stoichiometric
combustion, since Maximum flame temperature occurs at the 14.7:1 air/fuel mixture
combustion ratiovi
Transmission:
Must allow for the engine to be started under unloaded conditions even if the vehicle is in
movement, and should at least provide one reduction gear to have the engine operating in
the most efficient range of its power band while making the vehicle drivable in the speed
range of 0-20 MPHStarter
The starter must allow for a single person inside the cabin to turn the engine on without
taking their hands of the steering wheel.
Wheels and tires:
Michelin designs and manufactures ultra low rolling resistance tires specifically for this
competition, these are meant to fit over standard bicycle wheels, outfitting such wheel
with ultra low friction bearings and making this whole assembly as light as possible
would be ideal for the design.
2.2 Proposed Design Alternatives
2.2.1 Engine
In order to select the engine it is necessary to first examine the power
requirements to move our vehicle at the speed required by the competition. For the
preliminary analysis there will be several assumptions made, and these will be clearly
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
30/128
30
stated. The power requirements of our vehicle for any given speed are given by the
product of the sum of the forces acting against our vehicles motion and the vehicles
velocity and acceleration; therefore the power calculations were made using the
following parameters:
1)23- 4 5 6/7+ #. 8)")(-+-"7
FrontalAreaOfCar 0.42
PercentGrade 2
VehicleMass 136.36Drivetrain efficiency 0.8
Tire rolling resistance coefficient 0.0025
Brake and Steering Resistance 0.003
DragCoefficient 0.15AirDensity 1.225
Wheel Radius 0.254
It was assumed that the total mass for the car, and a driver with an average mass
of 150lbs, will be a maximum of approximately 300 lbs, or its equivalent value of 136.6
kg. CRRis found from the Michelin specifications for the ultra low resistance tire that will
be used in the car. The density of 1.225 for air is using standard temperature and pressure
(STP) guidelines. CD, the coefficient of drag, was selected as 0.15 considering a worst-
case scenario of an aerodynamic body design, based on previous competitors with similar
body shapes that have tested their cars and calculated this value. The area used of 0.42 m2
is an approximation of the frontal area of the car, according to preliminary solid works
models of possible designs of our car. Furthermore, R is the outer radius of the Michelin
tire that will be used in the car. Also, an assumed drivetrain efficiency of 80%, was again
chosen assuming a relatively inefficient transmission for the vehicle to err on the high
range of our numbers, and prevent an underpowered vehicle. The brake and steering
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
31/128
31
resistance coefficient was estimated after doing extensive research on previous
competitors cars.
The next step in the analysis is to calculate the forces acting on the prototype
according to the speed of the same. Keeping in mind the rules of the competition that
require an average speed of 15 mph, increments of 2 mph were used to calculate the three
component of total force:
As shown above, the force (Fdrag) that acts against the vehicle can be divided in
several different components. First FRR, or force due to rolling resistance, which is
represented as the sum in between tire, steering and brake resistances. Also, another force
that acts against the car at all times is the force due to air friction, F air. Last, we have
Finclinewhich is due to the weight of the car parallel to the the roads incline, since there is
no information about the topography of the track, a small assumption must be made
considering that the competition is takingn place in a track built in the urban setting of a
Downtown Houston park.
After calculating all the forces that act against the car, it is possible to begin the
calculations for the power required to move the vehicle. The power required to maintain
the car at this constant speed was found using the following formula:
!"#$= 0.5 %& ' (2
!)) =* + (%)) +%,-))
!#./0#.1
=* + 23
!4$"+= !
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
32/128
32
\O]
Once the power to keep the car moving at a constant speed has been calculated both in
Watts and horsepower (diving the above formula by a conversion factor), It is possible to
continue with the calculations of the kinetic energy and power required to accelerate the
vehicle. After researching average acceleration times for the same engine in similarly
sized vehicles and learning that it usually takes it 8s to get from zero to 20MPH, under
full throttle, we decided to use this time to do the following calculations:
\X]
\O]
Finally, we can use these values to calculate the total power required by the car in
Watts and in Horsepower. With this information, we are able to select a properly sized
engine that we will try to make as efficient as possible to fit the needs of the competition.
1)23- 9 5 !*-":; )*, 8#
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
33/128
33
Y5+?, :N/ ?-LU/.5 3U84/^ +: +5 A855+U7/ :8 A78: ,.3AN5 8M :N/ ?-LU/.5 M8-?B :8
U/::/. -?B/.5:3?B :N/ ./73:+8?5N+A5 U/:=//? :N/ 4/789+:; 8M :N/ 93. 3?B :N/ B/L3?B M8.
A8=/. 3?B /?/.,;"
?/:>"- @ 5 A"): B7 C-3#=/+;
From the graph shown above, it is possible to analyze the main sources of
resistance towards the movement of the car. From Figure (3), the drag force will increase
with an increase in velocity. However, it is important to note that this increase is
relatively small. An increase of 4 N in between the velocities of 2 mph to 24 mph makes
it clear that the main source of force resisting vehicular movement does not come from
aerodynamic drag. Furthermore, the components of Fdrag, which are show in Appendix A,
show that Finclineis responsible for about 70% of the total force. Since we can not control
the tracks topography, we can say that the total weight of the car is the major component
causing inefficiency on a vehicle that is not traveling on a level surface.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
34/128
34
?/:>"- 4D 5 E#
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
35/128
35
The GY6 style engines are popular in the small scooter, ATV and Go-kart
markets. There are various performance upgrade parts and documented modifications for
this type of engines available, including fuel injection conversions. This engine has a
higher compression ratio, which is something desired for higher thermodynamic
efficiency. The power rating and maximum torque are also the highest in the list with
almost a 33% advantage over the comparable Honda GXH50. On the downside; its fuel
consumption is about 10% higher. This engine is sold ready for a drum brake setup, and
comes equipped with an electric starter, and a continuously variable transmission (CVT).
The Honda engines are made in different sizes from 25cc to 50cc, and include a recoilstarter, and a centrifugal clutch. For the competitions purposes this starter would have to
be changed to an electric type in order to make it possible for the driver to turn the engine
on and off from the cockpit while the vehicle is in motion. On the other hand the
centrifugal clutch might come in useful for the development of a discrete reduction
gearing system with automatic engagement. Nonetheless the amount of support material
and documented modifications for this type of engines is also scarce, and the
nonexistence of an aftermarket part market means that tuning and performance part
upgrades would require more development and custom manufacturing.
Taking these factors into account and the expected power requirements of our
vehicle, the team has decided to opt for the GY6 engine.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
36/128
36
?/:>"- 44 5 !*:/*- 1#8 C/-"- 49 5 !*:/*- 7/,- B/-"- 4F 5 !*:/*- #* G+)*,
2.2.2 Clutch and Transmission
The GY6 engine comes with a proprietary centrifugal clutch and a continuously
variable transmission, or CVT. This transmission consists of a pulley on the engine shaft,
and another on the output shaft with a belt transmitting power between them. The way
different gear ratios are achieved is by having the pulleys be made of independent conical
halves (sheaves) that can move relative to each other increasing or decreasing the gap
between them so that the belt sits at different pitch circles, the ratio between the two pitch
circles would give us the gear ratio for that specific configuration, to obtain higher
understanding of the device is an exploded view in the diagram below:
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
38/128
38
?/:>"- 4H 5 E)"+7 &"-)',#
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
39/128
39
Changing the weight of the rollers, and the stiffness of the clamping spring can control
the rate at which the changes occur. This is unfortunately something that we cannot
model mathematically unless we know several dimensions, and material properties about
the transmission that are currently not available. Most of the data that will help us
optimize this transmission will come from obtaining direct measurements through
experimentation and what is referred to as tuning in the racing world.
The final drive ratio is the product of this reduction and two more that occur
inside a gearbox after the CVT, the stock gear ratios for these are in the table below and
the overall gear ratio describes the overall range:Table 3 Transmission gearing range
The centrifugal clutch consists of two main parts; the clutch swing arm assembly,
which rotates with the driven pulley, as the angular speed increases the arms swingoutward due to the centrifugal force and ultimately engage with the clutch bell. The
clutch bell being linked to the CVTs output shaft delivers the power to the gearbox and
after the compound reduction; it delivers it to the wheel. This clutch is extremely
important and needs to be tuned to achieve the following goals:
1. The clutch must be disengaged when the engine is idling, to comply with the
competitions guidelines
2. The clutch must engage quickly as the engine is throttled and must disengage
instantly when the engine is turned off. These two things are extremely important
for transmission efficiency and to enable the vehicle to coast freely without being
CVT Drive Ratio 0.8-2.0
First Gear Box Reduction 3.4
Second Gear Box Reduction 3.25
Overall Gear Ratio 8.84-26.1
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
40/128
40
subjected to braking forces due to compression in the engine piston when the
engine is off.
To achieve this goal it is necessary to try different clutch springs in order to find
the appropriate stiffness for the ones that will satisfy the design.
Unfortunately while a CVT offers very simple operation with virtually no driver
interaction, it is important to note that these transmissions can be very inefficient, with
values as low as 75%, mainly due to belt slippage, other sources that contribute to this
inefficiencies are friction at surface contacts of bushings and bearings, which the team
will attempt to reduce once the engine is physically dissected, and the parts measured, inorder to assess if suitable replacements can be found
2.2.3 Fuel Delivery System
The engines above come carbureted and the team is considering having a fuel-
injected design that would be satisfied by implementing small engine fuel injection and
ECU kits sold by Ecotrons or MBE Motorsports.
?/:>"- 4I 5 ?>-3 J*K-=+/#* L/+
The kits sold by both companies come equipped with an electric fuel pump to
pressurize the fuel before it reaches the injector, but using this pump goes against the
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
41/128
41
rules and regulations of the competition and a pre-pressurized fuel delivery system must
be implemented instead.
The guidelines stipulate that the maximum pressure this system can have is 5bar
or 72.5psi, furthermore the pressurized air must be stored in a clear container, and be
filled through a Schrader valve, the system must include safety valves, shutoff valves,
regulator, and gages, and everything must be easily drained, and removed from the
vehicle for inspection purposes.
The vehicles system will use a regular soda bottle outfitted with a Schrader valve
to accumulate air at up to 70psi, a safety relief valve will be set to release any excesspressure, and a shutoff valve will be placed inline, as per competition guidelines. This
pressure will then be reduced to 36psi with a regulator, to satisfy the operational pressure
requirements of the injector, and will then be routed to the competition-sanctioned fuel
tank. The pressurized fuel then travels through a line equipped with a shutoff valve, and
fuel-filter, before reaching the injector. A diagram of this system must be supplied to
Shell for the competition and can be seen below.
?/:>"- 4M 5 N#(83-+- ?>-3 A-3/B-"; G;7+-( A/):")(
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
42/128
42
@N/ 355/LU7/B M-/7 5;5:/L 5//L5 :8 N34/ 58L/ A./55-./ 7/3F =/ N34/ ;/: :8
B/:/9:^ 3?B :N/ 487-L/ 8M 3+. +? :N/ A./55-.+a/B #(8a 58B3 U8::7/ A.84/B :8 U/ +?5-MM+9+/?:
:8 L3+?:3+? 399/A:3U7/ A./55-./ B8=?5:./3L 8?9/ :N/ 4374/ =35 8A/?" @N/ 3+. :3?F =+77
U/ /W9N3?,/B M8. 3 $ [+:/. U8::7/ +? 8.B/. :8 98LA/?53:/ M8. :N/ 7/3F5 3?B :N/ 487-L/:.+9
/WA3?5+8? 8M :N/ ,35 B8=?5:./3L"
?/:>"- 4O5 ?>*=+/#*)3 .>-3 7;7+-(
2.2.4 Fuel
Two types of liquid fuel are available for spark-ignited engines, and the engine
and fuel injection kit can handle both types of fuel, these are 87-octane regular gasoline
and pure ethanol (E100).
Regular gasoline has an octane rating of 87 while pure ethanol has an equivalent
slightly over 115. The higher the octane rating, the higher compression the engine can
achieve before the air/fuel mix self-ignites creating engine knock which will hinder
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
43/128
43
performance and create more wear on the engine. On the other hand gasoline has a higher
energy density when compared to E100.
The team will choose to run 87-octane regular gasoline in our vehicle because
although it is recommended to modify the engine to achieve higher compression it is not
expected that this will happen due to time constraints, therefore we choose gasoline due
to its effectiveness and higher energy density that ethanol. Note that to this date the team
has not been able to find tables or equations that can help predict how much compression
an engine can achieve before inducing knock when using fuel with a given octane rating.
2.2.5 Starter
The engine considered comes with an electric starter, which is needed so that the
driver and/or computer can control when the engine turns on and off, allowing the car to
cruise with the engine off and then be started from within the cockpit when the speed
falls below a predetermined level.
2.2.6 Electrical System
The Vehicles electrical system consists of a 12v charging system comprised of a
battery and the AC magneto/stator integrated in the engine. The battery selected is the
smallest Lithium Ion battery manufactured for motosports and weights 0.5lbs at a cost of
50$, while an equivalent Lead/acid battery would have costed $30 but would have
weighted 3lbs.
The wiring harness was obtained from the same scooter that the engine was pulled
from, and was later simplified, spliced, and readapted to our vehicles needs. The
diagram below accurately represents the final product, and it is ready to be submitted to
the competitions authorities for review. The team made sure to include kill switches for
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
44/128
44
the engine accessible from the cockpit and from the vehicles exterior, plus a dedicated
toggle switch for the ECU, buttons were also included to spool the starter engine while
illuminating the starter signal light, and another one to sound the horn.
?/:>"- 4P 5 C-Q/=3- R/"/*: ,/):")(
b8:/ :N3: :N/ >7/9:.8?+9 *-/7 H?I/9:+8? 5;5:/L 98L/5 =+:N 3? /W:/?5+4/ 3?B
98LA7/W N3.?/55 8M +:5 8=?^ U-: :N/ 98??/9:+8?5 5N8=? 399-.3:/7; A+9:-./ N8= U8:N
N3.?/55/5 +?:/.39: =+:N /39N 8:N/."
2.2.7 Tires
As for the rear tire the GY6 engine under consideration uses a distinct type of
tires that is designed for scooters, and compatible wheels include a hub for an expanding
internal drum brake that is built into the engine, these must also have a distinct spline
pattern that must match the one on the engines output shaft, and :N/5/ :=8 A3::/.?5 3./
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
45/128
45
?8: 98?5+5:/?: U/:=//? 377 #%0cSE /?,+?/5 8. :N/ =N//75 :N3: 3./ 3B4/.:+5/B 35
98LA3:+U7/^ =N+9N 98LA7+93:/5 :N/ +55-/ 8M M+?B+?, 98../9: L3:9N/5.
The options to reduce rolling resistance in the rear tire would be to procure a high
pressure slick racing tire meant for scooters, for which there are only two manufacturers
worldwide, Savatech and Heideneau, and which would also produce a heavier assembly
which would not be as efficient as the one achieved with the Michelin tires, but to be able
to put this type of tire on the engine the team would have to be willing to invest time and
money in manufacturing it. So far the team has opted to procure the scooter racing
Heideneu tire and the wheel was inexpensively purchased along with the engine toguarantee a proper mate, but it was later realized that it is made of iron, so finding a cast
aluminum one would be the a viable improvement in weight reduction. Below is an
image of the slick tire mounted on the engine:
?/:>"- 4@ 5 !*:/*-
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
46/128
46
2.2.8 Frame
@N/ B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?, 8M :N/ M.3L/ =35 -?B8-U:/B7; 35 /W:/?5+4/ 35 +:
=35 9N377/?,+?," b8?/:N/7/55^ +: =35 +LA/.3:+4/ :N3: L-9N /MM8.: =/?: +?:8 :N+5 A3.: 8M :N/
A.8I/9: B-/ :8 +:5 +LA8.:3?9/" H: =35 97/3. :N3: :N/ M.3L/ 8M :N/ 93. =8-7B U/ :N/ .88: 8M
:N/ 93.^ 35 377 :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 =8-7B U/ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/" *-.:N/.L8./^ :N/
M.3L/ =8-7B ,+4/ :N/ 93. +:5 5:.-9:-.37 +?:/,.+:; 3?B F//A :N/ B.+4/. 53M/ +? :N/ 935/ 8M 3?
399+B/?:"
J//A+?, +? L+?B :N3: U/93-5/ :N+5 +5 3 5-A/. L+7/3,/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ :N/ 93. N3B :8
U/ 35 7+,N: 35 A855+U7/ =N+7/ 3758 U/+?, 53M/" @N/ M+.5: 5:/A +? B/5+,?+?, :N/ 93. =35 :8
39F?8=7/B,/ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? ./`-+./L/?:5 M8. :N/ 9N355+5^ 3?B B/5+,? 3.8-?B :N/L"
Fortunately, the competitions only r/`-+./L/?:5 M8. :N/ 9N355+5 =/./ :N3: :N/ .877 U3.
extend 5cm around the drivers helmet, and be large enough to protect the driver in the
935/ 8M 3 9877+5+8?" O+:N 58 M/= B/5+,? ./`-+./L/?:5^ :N/./ =35 A7/?:; 8M M.//B8L :8
B/5+,? :N/ M.3L/^ 8. 58 :N/ :/3L :N8-,N:" @N.8-,N8-: :N/ B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?,
process many constrictions were found that reduced the teams choices for the design of
:N/ M.3L/" @N/5/ 98?5:.3+?:5 =+77 U/ L/?:+8?/B 377 :N.8-,N8-: :N/ /WA73?3:+8? 8M :N/
B/5+,? A.89/55"
R?9/ :N/ ./`-+./L/?:5 =/./ F?8=?^ +?+:+37 B/5+,?5 U/,3?" @N/ M+.5: 98?5+B/.3:+8?
was to follow in the previous teams footsteps and build a chassis out of aluminum and
=/7B :N/ :-U/5 :8,/:N/." H? :N/ +?:/./5: 8M /W9/7+?, :N/ A./4+8-5 :/3L^ M-.:N/. ./5/3.9N =35
L3B/ :N3: 7/3B :8 98?5+B/.3:+8?5 8M 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?, =N+7/ -5+?, 93.U8? M+U/. A73:/5
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
47/128
47
=+:N 98LA85+:/5 +? U/:=//? \M+,-./ dd] 35 :N/ U35/ 8M :N/
9N355+5" *8. :N/ 98LA85+:/^ L3?; 9N8+9/5 =/./ 98?5+B/./B
+?97-B+?, U3753^ U+.9N^ N8?/;98LU ?8L/W^ 3?B M83L" @N/
3L8-?: 8M L3:/.+375 3778=/B M8. L3?; 8A:+8?5 :N3: 43.+/B +?
A.+9/^ =/+,N:^ 3?B 5:./?,:N" Y7:+L3:/7;^ U/93-5/ :N/ :/3L =35
-?3U7/ :8 M+?B 3 A73:/ 3?B 98LA85+:/ 98LU+?3:+8? A.+9/B
-?B/. e#))) :N3: 53:+5M+/B :N/+. B/5+./B A3.3L/:/.5^ :N/
9N8+9/ =35 L3B/ :8 U-+7B :N/ M.3L/ 8-: 8M 93.U8? M+U/.
:-U+?," @N+5 7/3B :8 98?9/.? 35 =/7B+?, =35 ?8 78?,/. 3?
8A:+8? 35 +: +5 +LA855+U7/ :8 =/7B 93.U8? M+U/." *8.:-?3:/7;^ ./5/3.9N -?4/+7/B 3 4/.;
-?+`-/ 3?B +??843:/ L/:N8B :8 I8+? 3?; :;A/ 8. 5+a/ 8M :-U+?," "- 9D 5 S#*-;=#(2
G+">=+>"-
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
48/128
48
@N/ A.89/55 8M B/5+,?+?, :N/ 93. =35 8?/ 8M
L-9N :.+37 3?B /..8." C/4/.37 B/5+,?5 M8. :N/
93. =/./ L3B/ -?:+7 3 M+?37 B/5+,? =35 9N85/?"
>4/? :N/?^ +: =35 B/9+B/B :N3: :N/ 3:1:+L/ M+?37
B/5+,? ./`-+./B 3BB+:+8?37 5-AA8.:5" @N/ 4/.;
M+.5: B/5+,? 93? U/ 5//? +? M+,-./ dd" @N+5
B/5+,? 5/.4/B 35 3 5:3.:+?, A8+?: M8. M-:-./
B/5+,?5^ U-: =35 ?8?/:N/7/55 B+593.B/B 35 :N/ :/3L M/7: :N3: 3 M-?9:+8?37 M.3L/ 98-7B U/
39N+/4/B =+:N L8./ 5+LA7+5:+9 98?M+,-.3:+8?5 3?B 7/55 L3:/.+375" *.8L :N/./^ 3 5/98?B
B/5+,? =35 L3B/ 3?B 93? U/ 5//? +? M+,-./dd" Q5 /4+B/?9/B U; :N/ M+,-./^ 3M:/. :N/ +?+:+37
B/5+,?^ L8./ 5+LA7+5:+9 B/5+,?5 =/./ 58-,N:" @N+5 B/5+,? M/3:-./5 :=8 M.8?: B+3,8?375 :N3:
98??/9: 3: :N/ M.8?: 4/.:+9/5 3?B :N/ :8A 4/.:+9/5 8M :N/ .877 U3." *-.:N/.L8./^ 3
`-3B.+73:/.37 .877 U3. =35 B/5+,?/B 5+?9/ 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/.5 =8-7B U/ -5/B 3?B :N85/
93??8: U/ L87B/B +?:8 3 9+.9-73. 5N3A/" E/93-5/ :N/ /?,+?/ N3B 37./3B; U//? 5/7/9:/B 3:
:N+5 A8+?:^ :N/ 98??/9:+?, A8+?:5 =/./ F?8=?^ 3?B =/./ 98?5+B/./B =N/? -5/B M8. :N+5
B/5+,?" @N/ :=8 B+3,8?37 78=/. :-U/5 :N3? 93? U/ 5//? +? 3 93?:+7/4/. 5:3:/ =8-7B 5/.4/
35 :N/ 78=/. L8-?:+?, A8+?:5 M8. :N/ /?,+?/" [+F/=+5/^ :N/ N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ 7893:/B 3: :N/
M3. U39F 8M :N/ M.3L/ =8-7B 5/.4/ 35 :N/ -AA/. L8-?:+?, A8+?: M8. :N/ /?,+?/" @N+5
mounting point would be to the tires shock absorber. As pointed out in the description of
:N/ /?,+?/^ :N+5 98??/9:+8? +5 ?8: +? :N/ 9/?:/. A73?/ 8M :N/ L8:8. 3?B :+./ 98?M+,-.3:+8?"
@N/ B/9+5+8? =35 :N/? L3B/ :8 A.89//B 3?B A-.9N35/ %( M//: 8M 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?," @N/
A-.9N35/ =35 L3B/ M8. ( :-U/5 8M ( M//:^ /39N :-U/ 985:+?, I-5: 3U8-: e#))^ M8. 3 :8:37 8M
I-5: -?B/. e())"
?/:>"- 94 5 ?/"7+ ?")(- A-7/:*
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
49/128
49
@N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./5 5N8= 58L/ 8M :N/
A./7+L+?3.; 5+L-73:+8?5 A/.M8.L/B" @N+5 M+,-./5
5N8= 58L/ 3?37;5+5 ./5-7:5 :N3: 5N8= M39:8. 8M
53M/:;^ :8:37 B+5A739/L/?:^ 3?B 5:./55/5"
?/:>"- 9F T*)3;7/7 U4V
?/:>"- 99 5 G-=#*, ?")(- A-7/:*
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
50/128
50
?/:>"- 9H T*)3;7/7 U9V
?/:>"- 9I T*)3;7/7 UFV
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
51/128
51
?/:>"- 9M T*)3;7/7 UHV
?/:>"- 9O T*)3;7/7 UIV
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
52/128
52
?/:>"- 9P T*)3;7/7 UMV
According to this analysis, the tentative dimensions of the carbon fiber tubes
showed that the structure would be quite overbuilt, and choosing a smaller pipe diameter
might have been a good option to reduce size, weight, and cost. Nonetheless the team
decided against this in order to be conservative, since we knew that our simulations did
not accurately represent the anisotropic nature of the material or the joining method to be
used.
R?9/ :N+5 B/5+,? =35 L3B/^ 3?B :N/ :-U/5 N3B 3..+4/B^ :N/ :/3L 9377/B :N/ B.+4/.
3?B U/,3? :/5:+?, :N/ 9-../?: 355-L/B B+L/?5+8?5 3?B M.3L/ 98?M+,-.3:+8?^ 35 B/A+9:/B +?
:N/ M+,-./" 28+?, :N+5 A.84/B :8 U/ :N/ 98../9: 9N8+9/ 35 :/5:+?, :N+5 98?M+,-.3:+8? =+:N
:N/ 39:-37 B.+4/. ./4/37/B 5/4/.37 9N3?,/5 ?//B/B :8 U/ L3B/" *+.5:7;^ :N/ -AA/.
N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ -5/B M8. :N/ .877 U3. A.84/B :8 U/ :88 5L377" @N+5 93-5/B :N/ B+3,8?375 :N3:
connect to the upper vertices of the roll bar to collide with the drivers helmet and thus
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
53/128
53
?8: 3778=+?, :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:" C/98?B7;^
:N/ N/+,N: 8M :N/ .877 U3. 3758 A.84/B :8
U/ +?5-MM+9+/?:^ 35 +: B+B ?8: A.84+B/ :N/
97/3.3?9/ M.8L :N/ N/7L/: ./`-+./B U;
:N/ 98LA/:+:+8?" S8./84/.^ :N/ +?+:+37
allocated length for the drivers
98LA3.:L/?: 8M ' M//: ( +?9N/5 A.84/B
:8 U/ -??/9/553.+7; 78?," C+?9/
:N/ B.+4/. +5 ' M//: :377 3?B
93A3U7/ 8M U/?B+?, N/. F?//5 3778=+?, :N/ 98LA3.:L/?: :8 U/ /4/? 5N8.:/.^ :N/ +?+:+37
377893:/B 7/?,:N =35 ./B-9/B"
O+:N 377 :N/5/ 8U5/.43:+8?5^ 3 ?/= 9N355+5 =35 B/5+,?/B" [3:/. 8? :N+5 ?/= B/5+,? =8-7B
U/ B/5+,?3:/B :N/ M+?37 B/5+,?" @N+5 ?/= B/5+,? 98?5+5:/B +? 9N3?,+?, :N/ 98??/9:+8? 8M
:N/ M.8?: B+3,8?375 :8 :N/ N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ U/?/3:N^ .3:N/. :N3? :N/ 98.?/." @N+5 =35 B8?/
U/93-5/ +: 3778=/B M8. 7/55 L3:/.+37 :8 U/ -5/B 35 :N/ ./`-+./B :-U/5 =8-7B U/ 5N8.:/. 3?B
3758 U/93-5/ :N+5 ?/= 98?M+,-.3:+8? =8-7B 39:-377; =+B/? :N/ B+5:3?9/ M.8L :N/ B+3,8?37
:-U/5 3?B :N-5 3778=+?, L8./ .88L M8. :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:" E; B8+?, :N+5 3?B =+B/?+?, :N/
M.8?: 8M :N/ M.3L/ U; L/./7; $ +?9N/5 A.84/B :8 U/ L8./ :N3? /?8-,N M8. :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:"
Q758^ 35 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ M+,-./^ :N/ 7/?,:N 8M :N/ B.+4/. 98LA3.:L/?: =35 ./B-9/B :8 '&
inches, less than the drivers height of 5 feet. The driver would bend her knees and fit,
?8?/:N/7/55" @N+5 3778=/B :N/ 93. :8 U/ 5N8.:/. =N+9N 3778=/B M8. U/::/. 3/.8B;?3L+95^
7/55 L3:/.+37 M8. :N/ U8B; 3?B M.3L/^ 3?B 7/55 9N3?9/5 M8. :N/ :/3L :8 /W9//B :N/
?/:>"- 9@ 5 W7/*: A"/B-" +# !X+")=+
A/(-*7/#*7
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
54/128
54
98LA/:+:+8? ./`-+./L/?:5 8M 3 L3W+L-L 7/?,:N" [35:7;^ 3: :N+5 A8+?: :N/ ./3. B+3,8?375
N3B :8 U/ ./L84/B 35 +: =35 B+5984/./B :N3: :N/; 9877+B/B =+:N :N/ /?,+?/" @N+5 =35 3
:./L/?B8-5 84/.5+,N: U; :N/ :/3L =N+9N L/3?: :N3: =+:N8-: :N85/ 5-AA8.:5^ :N/ :-U/5 :N3:
98??/9: B+./9:7; :8 :N/ /?,+?/ =8-7B U/ +? M-77 93?:+7/4/. 5:3:-/5" @N+5 93-5/B :N/ :/3L :8
M/3. :N3: :N/ :8.`-/ =8-7B U/ /?8-,N :8 93-5/ /?8-,N 8M 3 5N/3. :8 L3F/ :N/ /A8W; ./5+?
:N3: N/7B :N/ A3.:5 :8,/:N/. M3+7" @N+5 =35 73:/. 3BB./55/B U; N34+?, :N/5/ B+3,8?375
98??/9: 3: :N/ L+BB7/ 8M :N/ .877 U3. .3:N/. :N3? :N/ 78=/. 4/.:+9/5" @N+5 735: L+?-:/
./+?M8.9/L/?: 93? U/ 5//? 97/3.7; +? :N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./"
?/:>"- FD 5 !*:/*- Y-/*.#"=-(-*+7
2.2.9 Steering system
While researching and designing the steering system, the team took into
consideration the radius of turning and how it would impact the size and design of the
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
55/128
55
frame and body of the car. When considering the steering system, the group took into
consideration Ackermann turning where the larger the distance between the front and
back wheels of the car, the larger the radius of turning is. This goes against the teams
goal as they strive for the lowest turning radius for highest efficiency. Also, having a
lower turning radius means the wheels need to turn more in order to compensate, and this
in turn forces the car design to be wider in order to allow for the extra space needed for
the wheels to turn.
2.2.10 Body
X-5: 7+F/ :N/ M.3L/^ :N/ U8B; =35 3 4/.; 98LA7+93:/B 35A/9: 8M :N/ 93." S-9N /?/.,; +5
785: :8 M.+9:+8? =+:N :N/ 3+.^ L3F+?, +: +LA/.3:+4/ :N3: :N/ B+MM+9-7:+/5 U/ 84/.98L/ =+:N :N/
U/5: ./5-7:5 A855+U7/" b8?/:N/7/55^ +: +5 +LA/.3:+4/ :8 53; :N/ :/3L =35 A./55/B 8? :+L/
3?B :N3: B+B ?8: 3778= :N/ :/3L :8 B/5+,? :N/ U8B; 35 /W:/?5+4/ 3?B :N8.8-,N7; 35
8.+,+?377; +?:/?B/B" R.+,+?37 A73?5 +?97-B/B .-??+?, B.3, 5+L-73:+8?5 8? Q?5;5 58M:=3./
+? 8.B/. :8 M+?B :N/ 98/MM+9+/?: 8M B.3,^ 3?B .-??+?, =+?B :-??/7 5+L-73:+8?5 8? 3 5937/B
L8B/7 +? 8.B/. :8 98LA3./ :N/ A.39:+937 ./5-7:5 =+:N :N/ 8?/5 M.8L :N/ 5+L-73:+8?5"
*-.:N/.L8./^ :N/ A3?:N/. .3,/ V$ :/3L 5-,,/5:/B :8 :/3L AN3?:8L :8 U/,+? 3?B 98LA7/:/
:N/ B/5+,? 8M :N/ 9N355+5 U/M8./ :N/; U/,3? B/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; 8M :N/ 93." @N+5
./98LL/?B3:+8? =35 A-: :8 A.39:+9/ 3?B +: =35 :N/ .+,N: 9N8+9/" 2/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; 8M
:N/ 93. U/M8./ B/5+,?+?, :N/ +?:/.+8. =8-7B N34/ U//? 3 N-,/ L+5:3F/ :N3: +?/4+:3U7;
=8-7B N34/ 7/3B :8 :N/ U8B; 9877+B+?, =+:N :N/ 8?/ 8M :N/ L3?; +?:/.+8. 98LA8?/?:5"
Q7:N8-,N B8+?, :N/ M.3L/ M+.5: =35 98?5+B/./B :N/ U/5: +B/3^ :N+5 ./5-7:/B +? A-5N+?, U39F
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
56/128
56
377 :N/ =8.F 8? :N/ U8B; -?:+7 :N/ M.3L/ =35 98LA7/:/B" E/93-5/ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? =35 :8
U/ N/7B :N/ M+.5: =//F 8M QA.+7^ :N/ 93. N3B :8 U/ 5N+AA/B U; :N/ 735: =//F 8M S3.9N^ 3?B
:N/ M.3L/ =35 ?8: 98LA7/:/B -?:+7 /3.7; S3.9N^ :N+5 ./5-7:/B +? 3 5L377 =+?B8= 8M 8?7; 3
M/= =//F5 :8 98LA7/:/7; B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-./ :N/ U8B; M.8L 59.3:9N"
>4/? :N8-,N :N/ :/3L B+B ?8: /WA/9: :8 L3F/ 3 M+?37 B/9+5+8? 8? :N/ U8B; 8M :N/ 93. -?:+7
:N/ M.3L/ =35 98LA7/:/^ L3?; B+MM/./?: U8B; B/5+,?5 =/./ L3B/ =+:N :N/ +?:/?:+8? 8M
:/5:+?, :N/L 3?B B/:/.L+?+?, =N+9N N3B :N/ U/5: 3/.8B;?3L+95" E; B8+?, :N+5^ :N/
A.89/55 8M B/5+,?+?, 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?, 98-7B U/ /WA/B+:/B" *-.:N/.L8./^ U; B/5+,?+?,
:N+5 /3.7; +? :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ L-9N /WA/.+/?9/ =8-7B U/ ,3+?/B +? :N/ A.89/55 8M
B/5+,?+?, 98LA7/W 5N3A/5" @N+5 A.84/B :8 U/ :N/ 935/" Q7:N8-,N :N/ +?+:+37 B/5+,?5 =/./
?8: A+9F/B^ :N/ 8MM+9+37 B/5+,? =35 L3B/ A855+U7/ U/93-5/ 8M :N/ /WA/.+/?9/ 3?B A.39:+9/
M.8L :N/ /3.7+/. L8B/75"
H?+:+377;^ :N.// B+MM/./?: L8B/75 =/./ L3B/" @N/5/ :N.// L8B/75^ 35 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/
?/W: M+,-./^ 3./ 377 L3B/ =+:N 377 :N.// =N//75 +?5+B/ :N/ U8B;" @N/ L3+? B+MM/./?9/
U/:=//? :N/ :N.// +5 N8= :N/ ./3.5 /?B" Z/5/3.9N ./4/37/B :N3: :N/ :.3+7+?, /B,/ 8M 3
8UI/9: 93? N34/ 35 L-9N +?M7-/?9/ 8? +:5 3/.8B;?3L+95 35 :N/ M.8?: 8M :N/ 8UI/9:"
*-.:N/.L8./^ 3?8:N/. B+MM/./?9/ +5 :N/ A85+:+8? 8M :N/ =N//75 ./73:+4/ :8 :N/ U8B;" H? :N/
:8A .+,N: L8B/7^ +: 93? U/ 5//? :N3: :N/ U8B; 98LA7/:/7; 984/.5 :N/ :8A N37M 8M :N/ =N//7^
3778=+?, M8. 3 98?:+?-8-5 3?B M78=+?, 5-.M39/" ON/./35^ +? :N/ 8:N/. :=8 M+,-./5^ :N/
=N//75 A.8:.-B/ M.8L :N/ 5-.M39/ 8M :N/ U8B; :N-5 93-5+?, 58L/=N3: 8M 3 B+598?:+?-+:;
:N3: :N./3:/?5 :N/ B/5+./B .3+?B.8A17+F/ 5N3A/"
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
57/128
57
?/:>"- F4 5 ?/"7+ 1Q"-- ,; A-7/:*7
Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/5/ =/./ 8?7; A./7+L+?3.; B/5+,?5" R?9/ :N/ M.3L/ U/,3? :8 :3F/
5N3A/ 3 L8./ 98?9./:/ +B/3 =35 M8.L/B U-: 5:+77 +?5-MM+9+/?: :8 L3F/ 3 M+?37 B/5+,?"
Z/,3.B7/55^ 3 ?/= U8B; 35 5//? +? :N/ ?/W: M+,-./ =35 B/5+,?/B" Q: :N/ :+L/ 8M
98LA7/:+8?^ :N+5 ?/= B/5+,?/B =35 /WA/9:/B :8 U/ M+?37^ 8. 3: :N/ 4/.; 7/35: 4/.; 9785/ :8
:N/ M+?37 A.8B-9:" T8=/4/.^ +: +5 +LA/.3:+4/ :8 53; :N3: 8?9/ :N+5 L85: ./9/?: L8B/7 =35
M+?+5N/B^ 3?B & B+MM/./?: 8A:+8?5 =/./ 343+73U7/ :8 :/5:^ :N/ B/9+5+8? =35 L3B/ :8 348+B
.-??+?, 5+L-73:+8?5 M8. B.3, 98/MM+9+/?:5" Q7:N8-,N -?8.:N8B8W^ :N/ :/3L U/7+/4/B :N3: +:
=8-7B U/ U/::/. :8 =3+: -?:+7 3 M+?37 M.3L/ 3?B 3? +?98.A8.3:/B 5://.+?, 5;5:/L =+:N :N/
=N//7 =/./ B/5+,?/B +? 8.B/. :8 U/,+? 5+L-73:+8?5" Q: :N/ :+L/^ +: 5//L/B -?+?:-+:+4/ :8
.-? 5+L-73:+8?5 8? B+MM/./?: U8B+/5 :N3: A8:/?:+377; =8-7B U/ +LA855+U7/ :8 +?98.A8.3:/
=+:N :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 8M :N/ 93." O+:N :N/ 93. 98LA7/:/B^ +: 93? ?8= U/ 53+B :N3: +:
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
58/128
58
=35 97/3.7; :N/ .+,N: B/9+5+8?^ 35 ?8?/ 8M :N/ M8-. +?+:+37 B.3M:5 =/./ -5/B" @N+5 =+77 U/
/WA73+?/B M-.:N/."
?/:>"- F9 5 ?#>"+Q )*, !X8-=+-, A-7/:*
3.
Proposed Design
3.1Brakes selection
One of the most important things to keep in mind when defining the brakes of the
car was the overall usage of the same. During a fuel-efficient race, since the cars run at
very low speed, there are only two times when the brakes are mainly used. First, hours
before the race where you need to pass the inspection, which in the case of Shell Eco
Marathon is to make sure the system will support your car on a 20 degree slope, and
second, to keep your car stopped before the begin of a trial. Other than that, the brakes
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
59/128
59
are rarely used and therefore must be as weight and cost efficient as possible. As
mentioned above, the back tire comes with a drum breaking system already mounted,
which for convenience and cost purposes, did not have to be touched. For the two front
wheels, since we were using a model inspired in a tricycle, our team was able to
incorporate two low cost efficient disk braking systems alongside with the wheels
provided by the manufacturer, who also provided us with the necessary cables and brake
levers, in order to connect the system to the drivers hand. A picture very similar to the
braking system used in the car is shown below:
?/:>"- FF 5 &")'/*: 7;7+-(
3.2 Wheels, Tires, and Hubs:
There are three wheels to be used in our vehicles design. One of this wheels, the
rear one, is to be the powered wheel and two other wheels in the front will be used to
steer the car and will be free rolling.
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
60/128
60
The tires should cause the least rolling resistance possible and the Michelin ultra low
rolling resistance 44-406 tires are the best in its class for this application. Shell has a
partnership with Michelin to offer these to the participating teams for purchase at $78 per
tire. Our group was fortunate enough to be able to borrow last years Michelin two front
tires for our car. Some important characteristics of these tires are vii:
Rolling resistance: 2 kg/t (kilogram/ton)
Suitable pressure: 50PSI
Weight: About 150 grams
Suitable crochet-type rim reference: 20x1.75
Section Width: 45 mm
Overall diameter: 500 mm
?/:>"- FH 5 Z/=Q-3/* HH5HDMTaking into account the tires requirements, we solidified our choices for the two
front wheels. Inspired on a tadpole tricycle, two 20", non-machined rim wheels with
20mm trike hubs were purchased from PowerOnCycling to go in the front. In order to
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
61/128
61
optimize the design, we decided to customize with ceramic bearings, which also
minimizes dissipationviii. Together with the wheels, the same manufacturer was able to
provide us the hub mounts that will fit perfectly the diameter of wheel axle, which is
ideal for our steering system. It is important to remember that the back wheel and the
back tire have been purchased as package with the engine as explained in its designated
section.
?/:>"- FI 5 RQ--3
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
62/128
62
?/:>"- FM 5 S>2 Z#>*+
,+, (3..846/ (G:3.9
@N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L B/5+,?/B 3 M/= =//F5 U/M8./ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? =35 +?5A+./B +?
./9-LU/?: :.+F/5 3?B ,8 F3.:5" C+?9/ :N/ 399/7/.3:+8? 8M :N/ 93. =35 B8?/ +? 8?/ 8M :N/
N3?B5^ :N/ 3U5/?9/ 8M A/B375 9N377/?,/B 8-. :/3L :8 9./3:/ 3 5;5:/L :N3: =8-7B :-.? U8:N
8M :N/ =N//75 =+:N :N/ L8:+8? =+:N 8?/ N3?B 8?7;" @N/ 98?9/A: -5/B 93? U/ 58L/=N3:
./73:/B =+:N :N/ A+9:-./ U/78=f
?/:>"- FO 5 [#5')"+ 7+--"/*:
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
63/128
63
R? :N/ 7/M: 5+B/ 8M :N/ A.8:8:;A/^ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/^ 3? 37-L+?-L :-U/ =35 A-:
:8,/:N/. A/.A/?B+9-73.7; :8 3 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/ \53L/ 8?/ -5/B +? :N/ M.3L/] -5+?, 93.U8?
M+U/. :8= 3?B /A8W;" R? :N/ 8:N/. 5+B/ 8M :N3: :-U/^ 3 L/:37 5:.+A =35 =/7B/B :8 3?8:N/.
5+B/ 8M :N/ 37-L+?-L :-U/ +? 8.B/. :8 U/ 98??/9:/B :8 8?/ 8M :N/ :+/ .8B5" @N/ A+9:-./
U/78= 93? U/ -5/B 35 3? +77-5:.3:+8? 8M :N/ 5;5:/L"
?/:>"- FP 5 G+--"/*: =#**-=+/#*7
@N+5 :+/ .8B^ =N+9N +5 3AA.8W+L3:/7; & +?9N/5 78?,^ =35 98??/9:/B :8 3 U87: 8? +:5
8:N/. /?B" @N+5 U87: ,8/5 :N.8-,N 3?8:N/. L/:37 A73:/^ =N+9N +:5/7M =35 =/7B/B +?:8 :N/
N-U" @N+5 8MM5/: M.8L :N/ N-U5 +5 ./5A8?5+U7/ M8. :N/ Q9F/.L3?? :-.?+?, 8? :N/ 4/N+97/"
@N+5 U87:^ =N+9N 93? U/ 5//? 3U84/ 3758 ,8/5 :N.8-,N 3 $& +?9N/5 :.+LL3U7/ :-U-73. :+/
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
64/128
64
.8B^ =N+9N 98??/9:5 U8:N N-U5 :N/./M8./^ ,+4+?, :N/ :-.?+?, L8:+8? 8M :N/ 93. =+:N 8?/
L84/L/?:"
@N/ =3; :N+5 5;5:/L 98??/9:5 :8 :N/ M.3L/ +5 4/.; 5+L+73. :8 :N/ :/9N?+`-/ -5/B :8
98?5:.-9: :N/ U8B;" Q 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/^ 7/?,:N 8M 3AA.8W+L3:/7; $( +?9N/5 =35 7+?F/B :8
37-L+?-L ()(# K1K73LA5 \L8./ B/:3+75 8? :N/ L3?-M39:-.+?, 5/9:+8? 8M :N/ ./A8.:]"
@N/5/ K1K73LA5 3./ :N/? 98??/9:/B :8 :N/ N-U5 :N.8-,N :N/ F+?, A+? 5N8=? +? :N/ N-U
L8-?:"
?/:>"- F@ 5 R-3,-, Q>27
T8=/4/.^ 3M:/. ,/::+?, :8 T8-5:8?^ 8? :N/ M+.5: ?+,N: 8M :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ 8-. ,.8-A
L8-?:/B :N/ :8A A3.: 8M :N/ U8B; :8 :N/ U8::8L^ 7/34+?, 7+::7/ .88L M8. :N/ 5://.+?,
98?:.87^ =N+9N N3B U//? B/5+,?/B M8. 3 U8B; :N3: =8-7B N34/ 5:3;/B 8? :N/ 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/
=N//75" *39+?, :N+5 3B4/.5+:;^ =/ N3B :8 +LA.84+5/" 2-.+?, :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ =/ 93L/ -A
=+:N 3 5+LA7/ A-77/; 5;5:/L^ =N+9N =8-7B .8:3:/ U8:N =N//75 =+:N 3 M8.=3.B 3?B
U39F=3.B5 L8:+8? \.3:N/. :N3? 7/M: 3?B .+,N: =N+9N =35 7+L+:/B B-/ :8 :N/ U8B; 5N3A/]"
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
65/128
65
QM:/. .-5N+?, :8 N8L/ B/A8: 3?B U-;+?, :N/ A3.:5^ 3 5;5:/L =+:N M8-. A-77/;5 3?B 3 =+./
=35 U-+7:" Q5 =/ N3B /WA/9:/B^ :N/ ?/= 5;5:/L =8.F/B M3?:35:+9377; B-.+?, :N/ =//F/?B"
?/:>"- HDE>33-;
,+= I5JG
Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/ B/5+,? 8M :N/ M.3L/ =35 4/.; 98LA7+93:/B 3?B M-77 8M :.+37 3?B
/..8." @N/ :./L/?B8-5 3L8-?: 8M 9N3?,/5 :8 :N/ M.3L/ L3B/ +: 58 :N3: :N/ /WA/9:/B
B/5+,? M8. :N/ U8B; U/93L/ ./?B/./B -?B/5+.3U7/" S8./ 5A/9+M+9377;^ :N/ 8.+,+?37
+?:/?:+8? 8M N34+?, :N/ =N//75 +?5+B/ 8M :N/ 93. U/93L/ -?7+F/7; 35 9379-73:+8?5 ./4/37/B
:N3: N34+?, :N/ =N//75 8? :N/ +?5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B; =8-7B 7/3B :8 :N/ 5://.+?, M8.9+?, :N/
U8B; :8 U/ 84/. %% +?9N/5 =+B/" Q7:N8-,N 935:8. 3?,7/5 =/./ 3BB/B +? 3? /MM8.: :8 ./B-9/
:N/ 8-:/. B/M7/9:+8? 8M :N/ =N//7 35 +: :-.?/B^ +: A.84/B :N3: 37:N8-,N :N/ /MM8.:5 B+B L3F/
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
66/128
66
:N/ B/M7/9:+8? 7/55/.^ +: =35 ?8: 5-MM+9+/?: :8 3778= :N/ U8B; :8 U/ 7/55 :N3: %) +?9N/5 =+B/"
E/93-5/ 8M :N+5^ :N/ :/3L M/7: 4/.; 8U7+,3:/B :8 L3F/ 3 735: L+?-:/ 9N3?,/ :8 :N/ 93. 3?B
N34/ :N/ =N//75 8? :N/ 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B;" @N+5 =35 3 N-,/ B/9+5+8?^ 3?B 8?/ :N3: =35
L3B/ =+:N ?8: L-9N :+L/ :8 5A3./" E; :N/ :+L/ :N/ B/9+5+8? :8 7/34/ :N/ =N//75 8-:5+B/ 8M
:N/ U8B; =35 L3B/^ :N/./ =35 I-5: -?B/. 3 L8?:N -?:+7 :N/ :/3L N35 :8 5N+A :N/+. 93."
O+:N+? :N+5 8?/1L8?:N :+L/ M.3L/^ 3? /?:+./7; ?/= U8B; N3B :8 U/ B/5+,?/B 3?B
L3?-M39:-./B"
H: 93??8: U/ 84/.5:3:/B N8= 9N377/?,+?, :N+5 =35 U/93-5/ 8M :N/ :+L/ 98?5:.+9:+8?5" @N+5
=35 M-.:N/. 9N377/?,+?, :N3?F5 :8 :N/ 8U5:397/5 :N3: N3B :8 U/ 84/.98L/^ ?3L/7;
98?M8.L+?, :8 :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 8M :N/ 93." Q7:N8-,N N34+?, :N/ =N//75 8? :N/
8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B; B+B ?8: /?:3+7 L3?; 9N3?,/5 :8=3.B5 :N/ ./3. 8M :N/ 93.^ +: L/3?: 3
5-U5:3?:+37 3L8-?: 8M 9N377/?,/5 3?B 9N3?,/5 :8=3.B5 :N/ M.8?: 8M :N/ 93." S8./
5A/9+M+9377;^ :N/ ?/= U8B; N3B :8 U/ B/5+,?/B 58 :N3: +: =8-7B ?8: 9877+B/ =+:N :N/ =N//75
B-.+?, 5://.+?,^ ;/: U/ U+, /?8-,N :8 M+: :N/ =+B/ .877 U3. 3?B N34/ /W:.3 5A39/ :8 A739/
:N/ 5://.+?, 3?B 399/7/.3:+?, 5;5:/L5 M8. :N/ 93." @N/ 8U5:397/ N/./ 7+/5 +? L3F+?, :N/ 93.
U/ 5N3A/B 7+F/ 3 .3+?B.8A^ 35 =35 B/5+./B U; :N/ B/5+,?/." T34+?, :N/ 93. U/ 5N3A/B 7+F/ 3
.3+?B.8A =35 B+MM+9-7: 35 :N/ :-.?+?, =N//75 M8.9/B :N/ 93. :8 U/ :N+??/. 8? :N/ M.8?:^
=N+7/ :N/ .877 U3.^ U/+?, :N/ =+B/5: A3.: 8M :N/ 93.^ M8.9/B +: :8 U/ 3: +:5 =+B/5: =/77 U/N+?B
:N/ L+BB7/ 8M :N/ U8B;" *-.:N/.L8./^ :N/ /?,+?/ =35 ?8: 37+,?/B =+:N :N/ 9/?:/. 8M :N/
93.^ L/3?+?, :N3: +: M-.:N/. M8.9/B :8 93. :8 U/ ./73:+4/7; =+B/. ?/3. :N/ ./3. /?B"
*8.:-?3:/7;^ 3M:/. L-9N =8.F 3 B/5+,? =35 98LA7/:/B :N3: =35 -53U7/" Q7:N8-,N :N/
.3+?B.8A 5N3A/ =35 ?8: 8U:3+?/B^ :N/ :/3L =35 53:+5M+/B =+:N :N/ ./5-7:+?, B/5+,?" Q :N.//
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
67/128
67
B+L/?5+8?37 L8B/7 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ M+,-./ U/78="
?/:>"- H4 5 ?/*)3 A-7/:*
V+4/? :N3: :N+5 L8B/7 :88F 57+,N:7; 84/. $ =//F5 :8 B/5+,? B-/ :8 +:5 98LA7/W+:; 3?B
98?5+5:/?: 9N3?,/5 :8 98?M8.L :8 :N/ M.3L/ 3?B 5://.+?,^ 7/55 :N3? $ =//F5 =/./ 7/M: -?:+7
:N/ 93. =35 5N+AA/B" Q5 5:3:/B U/M8./^ :N+5 L/3?: :N3: :N/ :/3L -?M8.:-?3:/7;^ B+B ?8: N34/
:N/ :+L/ :8 .-? :N/ 5+L-73:+8?5 :8 8A:+L+a/ :N+5 5N3A/ 35 :N/; 8.+,+?377; +?:/?B/B" @N/
5+L-73:+8?5 =/./ 5F+AA/B^ 3?B :N/ A.89/55 8M L3?-M39:-.+?, U/,3?"
,+K L4621 %.:4/6
?/:>"- H9 5 N)" ?/*)3 4
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
68/128
68
4 Project Management
4.1 Overview
Q5 3 :/3L =8.F+?, :8,/:N/. M8. :N/ U/5: 8-:98L/ +? :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ :N/ :/3L
/?4+5+8?5 :8 A-: +? :N/ 53L/ 3L8-?: 8M =8.F +? :N/ A.8I/9:" Q77 L/LU/.5 3./ M-77; 3=3./
8M 377 L//:+?,5^ /WA/9:3:+8?5^ 8UI/9:+4/5 3?B :35F5 :N3: L-5: U/ L/: +? 8.B/. :8 L3F/ :N+5
I8-.?/; 3 5-99/55M-7 8?/ 3?B N34/ 377 98LL+::/B +? A-::+?, /`-37 :+L/ 3?B /MM8.: +?:8
B8+?, 58"
4.2 Breakdown of Work into Specific Tasks
b3:-.377; U-+7B+?, 3 93. A.8:8:;A/ =+77 +?4874/ A-::+?, 5/4/.37 A+/9/5 8M 3 A-aa7/
:8,/:N/. 5-99/55M-77; +? 8.B/. M8. :N/ M+?37 A.8B-9: :8 M-?9:+8? +B/377;" @N/ A.8:8:;A/ 93?
U/ B+4+B/B +? 5/4/.37 B+MM/./?: 5L377 5/9:+8?5 5-9N 35 >?,+?/ C/7/9:+8?^ E8B; 2/5+,?^
S3:/.+37 C/7/9:+8?^ KN355+5 \*.3L/]^ C://.+?, C;5:/L^ E.3F+?, 5;5:/L^ ON//7 3?B Z+L
5/7/9:+8?" C+?9/ :N/ A.8I/9: B/5+,? +?4874/5 A3.:+9+A3:+8? +? 3 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: +5 3758 4/.;
+LA8.:3?: :8 355+,? L/LU/.5 :35F5 :N3: =+77 355-./ :N/ :/3L +5 98LA7;+?, =+:N :N/
./,-73:+8?5 3?B B/3B7+?/5 +LA85/B U; :N/ 8.,3?+a/.5"
4.3 Project Timeline
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
69/128
69
?/:>"- HF 5 E"#K-=+ 1/(-3/*-
4.4 Breakdown of Responsibilities
*8. :N/ $)#% >98 CN/77 S3.3:N8? :/3L^ :N/ :35F5 N34/ U//? B+5:.+U-:/B 35 M8778=5f
S3.98 E/:3?98-.:f >?,+?/ ./5/3.9N 3?B 5/7/9:+8?^ *-/7 5/7/9:+8? 3?B B/7+4/.;
5;5:/L 3?B @.3?5L+55+8? 5;5:/L"
E.;3?B Q985:3f Q/.8B;?3L+9 ./5/3.9N^ U8B; B/5+,?^ L3:/.+37 5/7/9:+8? 3?B M.3L/
B/5+,?"
*/.?3?B8
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
70/128
70
\:N.// N-?B./B 3?B M8.:;] N8-.5" *8. :N/ 5/98?B A3.: 8M :N/ A.8I/9: C/?+8. 2/5+,? HH^
98-?:7/55 N8-.5 =/./ 5A/?: +? :N+5 93." C:3.:+?, +? :N/ 735: =//F 8M X3?-3.;^ =N/? :N/ M+.5:
A3.:5 5:3.:/B :8 3..+4/^ :N/ ,.8-A L/: 98?5+5:/?:7; % 8. & :+L/5 3 =//F M8. 5/4/.37 N8-.5^
58L/:+L/5 /4/? #( N8-.5 3 B3;" Q5 :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? 5:3.:/B :8 3AA.839N^ :N/ =8.F 783B
8?7; +?9./35/B" 2-.+?, CA.+?, E./3F M8. /W3LA7/^ :N/ ,.8-A L/: M8. #$ N8-.5 8. L8./ M8.
3: 7/35: ' :+L/5" H? :N/ 735: :=8 =//F5 U/M8./ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: +5 ?8: 3? /W3,,/.3:+8? :8
53; :N3: D$ N8-.5 =/./ 5A/?: 98?5/9-:+4/7; 3L8?, :N/ % 8M -5 +? :N+5 93."
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
71/128
71
5. Engineering Design and Analysis
5.1 Estimated Cost Analysis
*HY >98 CN/77 $)#% ,.8-A +5 9-../?:7; 3: :N/ 5:3,/ 8M A-.9N35+?, L85: 8M :N/ A3.:5 :N3:
=+77 U/ L3?-M39:-./B :8 :N/ 93." E/78=^ 3 U./3FB8=? 8M :N/ /WA/9:/B /WA/?5/5 U/M8./ =/
5:3.:/B :N+5 A.8I/9: 35 =/77 35 3 L8./ B/:3+7/B :3U7/ 8M :N/ /WA/?5/5 =/ N34/ N3B 58 M3. 3./
5N8=?f
1)23- H 5 !X8-=+-, !X8-*7-7
!"#$%&$' !"#$)*$*
+,&-. /0-**1* !"#$)*$* "#$$%$$+,&-. 2,'3 40$.. !"#$)*$* "&'(&$%$$
+,&-. !)51)$ !"#$)*$* "($$%$$
+,&-. 26-7$ 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "))$%$$
+,&-. 4&$$61)5 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "*&+%$$
+,&-. +6-9$. !"#$)*$* "*'($$%$$
+,&-. :,)$3 ;
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
72/128
72
5.2 Actual Cost Analysis
1)23- I 5 N>""-*+ !X8-*7-7
>%&
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
73/128
73
QDI:812 O:R1 "&%++ & "&%++
QDI:812 />R3 "&-%++ & "&-%++
O0>6 ".-%+) & ".-%+)
G:2234S "-+%+) & "-+%+)
V:5MN: =3234 ".*+%$$ & ".*+%$$Q534E3;HSCL>2HI "*%++ & "-%.*
J>43 T:4;311 "+$%$$ & "+$%$$
+,&-. !)51)$ !"#$)*$* "&'.*,%)+
26-7$ 43*&$8
G4:1H1 "*$%$$ . "($%$$
V3@34 \R:>4] "&,%++ & "&,%++
T3>N:;:8 9>43 "+(%&- & "+(%&-
()BB O:M631 "&%&$ . ".%.$
.$BB JI3361 "++%.$ . "&+#%-$
O34:5>H M3:4>;E1 "($%$$ . "&.$%$$
+,&-. 26-7$ 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "-+-%,*
4&$$61)5 43*&$8
T8M =08;2 "*,%)$ . ",)%$$
C5:66 2>3 40N ".)%++ & ".)%++G>E 2>3 P0N "&,%++ & "&,%++
[6 M60H63 CI>RR>;E "&'-*$%$$ & "&'-*$%$$
+,&-. +6-9$. !"#$)*$* "*'(,(%)$
401##1)5 !"#$)*$*
=:4H0 ").%)* & ").%)*
734;:;N0 "-.%,. & "-.%,.
G4S:;N "-$%,( & "-$%,(
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
74/128
74
+,&-. 401##1)5 !"#$)*$* "&*(%$&
>%,88,'-&1,)
T0236 ",(&%*$ & ",(&%*$
>%,88,'-&1,) +,&-. ",(&%*$
=&0$6 $"#$)*$*
=:4H0 J36N>;E'VQA1'TA'P:N>0CI:H< "&+&%-$
734;:;N0 J:6E433;1'TA "(-%,$
G4S:;N J:6E433;1' TA "()%*$
902:6 ^2I34 QDR3;131 "*.&%-$
+=+>? !@A!B4!4 ")'+-*%(*
+=+>? !@!:A+ "*'(,(%)$
+=+>? /=4+ ")'+-*%(* * "&'+#&%.&
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
75/128
75
6. Manufacturing
M+* (3..846/ (G:3.9
@N/ L3?-M39:-.+?, A.89/55 8M :N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L +?4874/B 5/4/.37 5L377 5:/A5" @N/
M+.5: 8?/ =35 :8 9./3:/ K1K73LA5 :8 U/ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ N-U" H? 8.B/. :8 9./3:/ :N85/^ :=8
U789F5 8M 37-L+?-L =/./ 8.B/. =+:N #"' W #"' +?9N/5 5+B/ 3?B % +?9N/5 7/?,:N" O+:N :N85/
U789F5^ =/ =/./ 93U3U7/ 8M -5+?, 3 L+77 :8 9-: 8MM 3 5L377 ./9:3?,7/ M.8L :N/ +?5+B/^
:N/./M8./ ./5-7:+?, +? :N/ K 5N3A/ ?//B/B"
?/:>"- HH 5 N5N3)(87 (/33/*:
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
76/128
76
QM:/. 8U:3+?+?, :N/ /WA/9:/B ./5-7:5^ =/ 5:+77 N3B A.8U7/L5 B-/ :8 :N/ M39: :N3: :N/
:-.?+?, =35 7+L+:/B U; :N/ 5N3.A 3?,7/5 8M :N+5 5-AA8.:" H? 8.B/. :8 5874/ :N+5^ 3 ,.+?B/.
=35 -5/B :8 9./3:/ M+77/:5 +? 377 5+B/5 8M :N+5 A+/9/^ 9./3:+?, 3 5/L+9+.9-73. 5N3A/ 8? U8:N
5+B/5" R?9/ :N/ K1K73LA5 =N/./ ./3B;^ :N/./ =/./ =/7B/B :8 3? 37-L+?-L A+A/ =+:N "G)&
8-:5+B/ B+3L/:/.^ I-5: U+, /?8-,N :8 U/ M+::/B +?:8 :N/ 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/5 :N3: =/./
3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/" @N+5 :/9N?+`-/ =35 -5+?, U/93-5/ =/ 98-7B ?8: =/7B 93.U8? M+U/.
:8 :N/ K1K73LA 3?B =/ =3?:/B :8 534/ 58L/ =/+,N: U; ?8: -5+?, 3 78?, 37-L+?-L .8B" H?
8.B/. :8 L3F/ 5-./ :N/ 37-L+?-L =8-7B 5:+9F :8 :N/ 93.U8? M+U/.^ /A8W; =35 -5/B"
?/:>"- HI 5 N5=3)(87
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
77/128
77
?/:>"- HM 5 TX3- =#**-=+/#*
M+; I82N46/ (G:3.9
CL377 L3?-M39:-.+?, =35 B8?/ +? 8.B/. :8 39N+/4/ :N/ B/5+./B U.3F+?, 8-:98L/"
H? 8.B/. :8 ./5A/9: :N/ .-7/5 8M :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: =35 ./`-+./B :8 -5/ U8:N U.3F/5 +? :N/
M.8?: =+:N 8?/ L/9N3?+5L" @N/ 587-:+8? :8 :N3: =35 =/7B+?, :=8 U.3F+?, 7/4/.5 :8,/:N/.^
:N/./M8./ A./55+?, U8:N =+:N 8?/ L8:+8?"
M+, L829.
@N/ A.89/55 8M L3?-M39:-.+?, U/,3? =+:N :N/ A./4+8-57; L/?:+8?/B A3:/?: U; J8:7+?5F+"
Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/ A.89/55 /?:3+7/B -5+?, 93.U8? M+U/. :8= 35 3 L/3?5 :8 9./3:/ -1
I8+?:5 3?B 3::39N :N/L :8 :N/ 37./3B; A-.9N35/B 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?," @N/ A.89/55 93? U/
U/5: B/A+9:/B +? :N/ ?/W: M+,-./^ 98-.:/5; 8M :N/ +?4/?:8.^ J8:7+?F5+f
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
78/128
78
?/:>"- HO 5 Z-+Q#, \. T,K#/*/*: +>2-7
@N/ M8778=+?, :N.// M+,-./5 B/A+9: 58L/ ./37 7+M/ 3AA7+93:+8?5 35 5N8=? U; J8:7+?5F+" @N/
M+.5: 8M :N/ :N.// B/A+9:5 N8= :N/ I8+?:5 3./ .+,N: 3M:/. U/+?, :+/B :8,/:N/.^ =N+7/ :N/
5/98?B 3?B :N+.B 5N8= 3 M+?+5N/B A.8B-9: 3?B :N/ A.8B-9: +? -5/^ ./5A/9:+4/7;"
?/:>"- HP 5 Y-7>3+] !X)(83- 4
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
79/128
79
?/:>"- H@ Y-7>3+] !X)(83- 9
?/:>"- ID Y-7>3+] !X)(83- F
Q5 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ A./4+8-5 M+,-./5^ :N+5 L/:N8B 3778=5 M8. L-7:+A7/ :-U/5 :8 98??/9: 3:
3 5+?,7/ 4/.:/W^ 8. 9./3:/ 3 98??/9:+8? A8+?: 378?, 3 :-U/" H: +5 L3+?7; U/93-5/ 8M :N/5/
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
80/128
80
./358?5^ :N/ 3MM8.B3U+7+:; 8M :N+5 L/:N8B^ 3?B :N/ 3U+7+:; :8 98??/9: L3?; :-U/5 3: 3?;
3?,7/ :N3: :N/ :/3L +LL/B+3:/7; B/9+B/B :8 3AA7; :N+5 L/:N8B"
Q7:N8-,N :N+5 L/:N8B +5 +??843:+4/ 3?B N/?9/ ?8: L-9N +?M8.L3:+8? 8? +: +5 343+73U7/^ :N/
:/3L A.89//B/B :8 -5/ +:" E-: :N+5 739F 8M U39F,.8-?B F?8=7/B,/ L3B/ M8. L-9N .88L
M8. /..8." @N/ 5:/A5 =N/./ M8778=/B 35 9785/7; 35 A855+U7/ M8778=+?, :N/ B/59.+A:+8?
A.84+B/B +? :N/ A3:/?:" Q5 3 5:3.:+?, A8+?:^ :N/ :/3L 9./3:/B :N/ L39N+?/ 5-,,/5:/B U; :N/
+?4/?:8. :8 =.3A :N/ L3?B./75 =+:N :N/ :8=" @N/ L39N+?/^ 35 U/78=98?5+5:5 8M 3 .877 8M
:8= U/+?, N/7B +? A739/^ =N+7/ 5:.+?, +5 A-77/B :N.8-,N 58L/ N88F5 :N3: 5/.4/ :8 9./3:/
:/?5+8?" Q5 :N/ :8= +5 U/+?, =.3AA/B 3.8-?B :N/ 5A+??+?, 98LA8?/?: :N3: N87B5 :N/
L3?B./75 :8 :N/ .+,N:^ +: +5 3758 A355+?, :N.8-,N 3 5L377 98?:3+?/. :N3: N8-5/5 3 L+W:-./ 8M
/A8W; ./5+? L+W:-./" @N/ A.89//B+?, M+,-./ +5 :N/ 39:-37 L39N+?/ U/+?, -5/B 3M:/. +: =35
M+?+5N/B"
?/:>"- I4 R/*,/*: Z)=Q/*-
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
81/128
81
?/:>"- I9 R/*,/*: Z)=Q/*-
H: 5N8-7B U/ 5:3:/B :N3: 37:N8-,N :N+5 L39N+?/ =35 4/.; N/7AM-7 +? :N/ A.8B-9:+8? 8M :N/ -
I8+?:5^ 5/4/.37 98LA7+93:+8?5 =/./ L/: :N.8-,N8-: :N/ =3;" *+.5:^ 35 93.U8? M+U/. :8= N35
3 ./73:+4/7; 73.,/ L8B-7-5 M8. :/?5+8? U-: 4/.; 78= M8. 98LA./55+8? 3?B 5N/3.^ :N/ :8=
=35 A.8?/ :8 9-::+?, /35+7;" @N3: +5^ :N/ M.+9:+8? 3,3+?5: :N/ L/:377+9 N88F5 -5/B =35 L8./
:N3? /?8-,N :8 93-5/ :N/ :8= :8 U./3F 8? 5/4/.37 89935+8?5" Q758^ +: A.84/B :8 U/ `-+:/
:N/ 9N377/?,/ :8 N34/ :N/ 3M8./L/?:+8?/B 98?:3+?/. N8-5/ :N/ ./5+? L+W:-./ 3?B N34/ :N/
:8= A355 :N.8-,N =+:N8-: 93-5+?, :N/ ./5+? :8 /593A/ :N.8-,N :N/ /W+: N87/ 8M :N/ :8="
S8./84/.^ :N/ 5A+??+?, A3.: 8? :N/ .+,N: ./`-+./B :N3: :N/ :8= U/+?, =.3AA/B U/
98?5:3?:7; ,-+B/B +? 8.B/. :8 B+5:.+U-:/ :N/ :8= /4/?7; 378?, :N/ L3?B./7" R.+,+?377; :N/
:/3L +?:/?B/B :8 A-: 3 5L377 L8:8. 8? :N+5 L84+?, A3.: U-: U/93-5/ 58 L-9N /W:/.?37
,-+B3?9/ =35 ?//B/B M8. :N/ :8=^ +: A.84/B :8 U/ L-9N /35+/. :8 348+B :N/ L8:8. 3?B B8
:N/ 5A+??+?, L3?-377;" Q7:N8-,N :+L/ 98?5-L+?,^ :N+5 ./5-7:+?, - I8+?:5 =/./ 8M
399/A:3U7/ `-37+:;" @N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./ 5N8=5 :N/ ./5-7:+?, - I8+?:" @N/ A+9:-./ 5N8=5
8?7; 8?/ -1I8+?:^ U-: L8./ :N3? %) =/./ A.8B-9/B" Q758 +LA8.:3?: :8 ?8:+9/^ :N/ 788A N35
-
7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)
82/128
82
3 9+.9-73. 5N3A/" @N+5 +5 B8?/ A-.A85/7; 58 :