fiu design report - 2012(1)

Upload: vaidotas-vaiceliunas

Post on 24-Feb-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    1/128

    EML 4905 Senior Design Project

    A B.S. THESISPREPARED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE

    REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OFBACHELOR OF SCIENCE

    INMECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    SHELL ECO-MARATHON

    100 % of Final Report

    Bryand AcostaMarco BetancourtFernando Pinheiro

    Advisor: Professor Igor Tsukanov

    February 20, 2012

    This B.S. thesis is written in partial fulfillment of the requirements in EML4905. The contents represent the opinion of the authors and not the

    Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    2/128

    2

    Ethics Statement and Signatures

    The work submitted in this B.S. thesis is solely prepared by a team consisting of MarcoBetancourt, Bryand Acosta, and Fernando Pinheiro and it is original. Excerpts from

    others work have been clearly identified, their work acknowledged within the text andlisted in the list of references. All of the engineering drawings, computer programs,formulations, design work, prototype development and testing reported in this documentare also original and prepared by the same team of students.

    Marco BetancourtTeam Leader

    Bryand AcostaTeam Member

    Fernando PinheiroTeam Member

    Dr. Igor TsukanovFaculty Advisor

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    3/128

    3

    Table of Contents

    LIST OF FIGURES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #

    LIST OF TABLES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $

    ABSTRACT """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %

    1 INTRODUCTION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" &

    1.1PROBLEM STATEMENT """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""#1.2MOTIVATION """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""#1.3LITERATURE SURVEY"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $$

    !"#"! %&'()*+,-. %&/(,0&1&.+2 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !!

    !"#"3 4-15&+,+-0 622&221&.+ """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !!

    1.3.3 Background Theory""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !7

    $"%&'()*' '+*,-.-& """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /0

    2. DESIGN ALTERNATIVES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" '%

    2.1OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL DESIGN """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /12.2PROPOSED DESIGN ALTERNATIVES """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" /#

    2.2.1 Engine """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 38

    2.2.2 Clutch and Transmission """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #7

    2.2.3 Fuel Delivery System"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9:2.2.4 Fuel"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 93

    2.2.5 Starter""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9#

    2.2.6 Electrical System """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9#

    2.2.7 Tires """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 99

    2.2.8 Frame"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 9;

    2.2.9 Steering system"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    4/128

    4

    :"0

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    5/128

    5

    List of FiguresFigure 1 - Evo Supermileage"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #$Figure 2 - Alerion Supermileage""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #%Figure 3 - Project Infinity""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #%Figure 4 - Univ of Malaysia"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #&

    Figure 5 - Eco Illini""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #'Figure 6 - Team Green"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #'Figure 7 - Ecolancers"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" #(Figure 8 Distribution of energy in a vehicle"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" $)*+,-./ 0 1 2.3, 45 6/789+:; """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %%*+,-./ #) 1 ?,+?/ @8A 6+/= """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %(*+,-./ #$ 1 >?,+?/ 5+B/ 4+/= """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %(*+,-./ #% 1 >?,+?/ 8? C:3?B """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %D*+,-./ #& 1

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    6/128

    6

    *+,-./ &( 1

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    7/128

    7

    List of Tables@3U7/ # 1 [+5: 8M A3.3L/:/.5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %)@3U7/ $ 1 >?/.,; 3?B A8=/. 9379-73:+8?5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %$Table 3 - Engine selection""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" %&@3U7/ & 1 >WA/9:/B >WA/?5/5 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" D#

    @3U7/ ' 1 K-../?: >WA/?5/5 """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" D$

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    8/128

    8

    Abstract

    The main objective of this project is to design a fuel-efficient car prototype moved by an

    internal combustion engine to participate in the 2013 Shell Eco Marathon in Houston,

    Texas during the dates of March 29th- April 1st. Panther Killer used Panther Rage G2

    and Panther Rage cars as reference but a new car was build from scratch envisioning an

    efficient transition to the internal combustion category of the competition. Abiding by the

    extensive rules and regulations of the competition, our group modeled, manufactured and

    tested a vehicle with optimum aerodynamics, minimum weight and reasonable budget

    that fit the realistic guidelines of the project.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    9/128

    9

    1 Introduction

    1.1 Problem StatementOne of the main concerns of our generation is the gradual increase of the earths

    temperature, in other words, the phenomenon called Global Warming. This constant

    elevation of the earths thermometers could lead to catastrophic results in a matter of

    decades, such as the melting of the poles, disappearing of islands and extinction of races.

    The biggest catalyst to this phenomenon is the emission of greenhouse gases. Greenhouse

    gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are mainly generated due to the combustion

    of fossil fuels, one of them being oil that moves our cars. The accumulation of those

    gases in the layers of the atmosphere is called the greenhouse effect.

    Keeping in mind the threats our environment is currently under, Shell created a

    few decades ago the Shell Eco-Marathon competition, challenging students to not only

    look for other alternatives of energy but also, to improve and optimize the ones that can

    be found today. Even though our government invests over $51 billion dollars per year in

    renewable energiesi

    , over 80% of the energy we use in the world today, still comes from

    fossil fuels against 9% from renewable sources. Therefore, keeping in mind oil will still

    be the main source of energy for our cars in the near future; the Shell Eco-Marathon has

    helped students to explore ways to improve mileage per gallon in such vehicles. ii

    1.2 Motivation

    The project was first introduced to the group by one of the teams members,

    Bryand Acosta. Bryand, who had contacted members that were part of Panther Rage G2

    team in the previous year, saw a great opportunity in this project to keep the tradition at

    Florida International University (FIU) of participating and representing the school in this

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    10/128

    10

    internationally recognized competition. Last years team had nothing but great feedback

    to give to Panther Killer, and after surpassing their own expectations in the

    competition, they highly recommended the experience for the present team.

    Made up of members that had previously few or no hands on experience with

    the concepts learned throughout our engineering courses at FIU, our team was

    immediately attracted by the chance of building a car prototype. This project involves

    basic concepts of real sized cars such as design of a chassis, a body, steering and braking

    systems and most importantly putting it all to work with an engine. Combining these

    elements with the challenges of reducing weight, increasing aerodynamics and respectingthe rules of the competition, this years team saw in the Eco Shell Marathon the perfect

    components to fulfill the requirements of Senior Design Project.

    Panther Killer has utilized concepts learned not only in the classroom but also in

    computer programs, such as Solid Works and CAD, which were essential in order to

    make some of the simulations of the car.

    Last, the team that is representing FIU this time around, is looking forward to

    travel to a different state and network with students from different countries and

    exchanging ideas and different concepts that are utilized in the engineering world. The

    team sees the competition as a rewarding experience for all the months of hard work put

    into it.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    11/128

    11

    1.3 Literature Survey

    This survey has the purpose of letting the team members become informed on the

    theory behind the basic functionality and operation of the different components and

    systems that come together to make an automobile. Furthermore this survey will extend

    into assessing the technologies used by the top ranking competitors in the Shell Eco-

    Marathon over the years.

    *+,+* -./0123456 -.7048.9.63:

    Shell provides access to a comprehensive publication of all the rules and

    regulations of each years competition, the team will have to constantly reference this

    book to make sure every design requirement is met before manufacturing can take place.

    A copy of this rulebook is not provided within the body of this document so as not to

    dilute its content, but is available in appendix A.

    *+,+; '59

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    12/128

    12

    Figure 1 - Evo Supermileage

    Results:

    673km/L

    Body:

    Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels

    Engine:

    modified briggs &Stratton engine with custom overhead cams and valves, 47cc of

    displacement, 13.7:1 compression ratio, sequential electronic fuel injection with

    programmable ECU and electric starter.

    Transmission:

    Centrifugal clutch, single gear ratio 10:1, with replaceable gears to vary from 9:1 to 13:1

    Vehicle Weight:

    47kg

    Cost:

    50000$ Canadian dollars and 8000 hours of fabrication

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    13/128

    13

    Alerion Supermileage

    Figure 2 - Alerion Supermileage

    Results:

    1347km/L

    Body:

    Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels

    Vehicle Weight:

    94lb

    Project Infinity

    Figure 3 - Project Infinity

    Results:

    1347km/L

    http://www.mecano.gme.usherbrooke.ca/~supermileage/images/Fils5.jpg
  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    14/128

    14

    Body:

    Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels

    Wheels:

    Michelin 44-406

    University of Science of Malaysia

    Figure 4 - Univ of Malaysia

    Body:

    Aluminum frame on composite honeycomb sandwich for the floor pan

    Wheels:

    Custom made hubs for ceramic angular contact bearings, as replacement for OEM wheel

    hub

    Results:

    Could not finish race because the car could not travel up a steep slope for lack of a lower

    gear ratio

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    15/128

    15

    Eco Illini

    Figure 5 - Eco Illini

    Body:

    Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels

    Engine:

    Saito 57cc 2 cylinder boxer engine for hobby aircraft, with custom throttle body for

    electronic fuel injection, with Megasquirt 3 ECU, and electric start

    Transmission:

    Single reduction transmission with a 451c wheel size sprocket

    Team Green

    Figure 6 - Team Green

    Results:

    6603 mpg

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    16/128

    16

    Body:

    Monocoque carbon fiber, with 3 wheels

    Engine:

    34cc single cylinder engine customized with 2 sparkplugs, variable inlet valve timing and

    fuel injection with an engine management system provided by General Engine

    Management Systems Ltd

    Transmission:

    Centrifugal Clutch

    Wheels:20in modified BMX style bicycle wheels with Michelin low rolling resistance tires, and

    custom hubs.

    Weight:

    42kg

    Ecolancers

    Figure 7 - Ecolancers

    Results:

    318 mpg

    Body:

    Aluminum structure with sheet metal body and 3 wheels

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    17/128

    17

    Engine:

    GXH Honda 49cc single cylinder engine with fuel delivery via carburetor

    Transmission:

    Extreme Duty Centrifugal Clutch coupled with a single gear 12:1 reduction as large as

    the wheel itself

    Wheels:

    Bicycle wheels with Michelin low rolling resistance tires.

    Weight:

    42kg

    1.3.3 Background Theory

    Engine Efficiency

    Competition guidelines state that every internal combustion engine used to compete must

    use a four-stroke cycle to produce power.

    In theory the internal combustion engine efficiency is limited to that of the Carnot-cycle

    The efficiency for a Thermodynamically reversible Carnot cycle engine is given by the

    equation:

    where: is the efficiency

    TC is the absolute temperature in the cold heat reservoir

    THis the absolute temperature in the hot heat reservoir

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    18/128

    18

    The Carnot Cycle theorem states that:

    An engine operating between two heat reservoirs can not be more efficient than a

    Carnot engine operating between these same reservoirs.iii

    The temperature of the cold reservoir is given by the ambient temperature outside the

    engine, which should be between 15C and 25C during the month of April in Houston,

    Texas.ivOn the other hand the maximum temperature that could be achieved would be

    limited by the metallurgic properties of the engine and this temperature is also referred to

    as the adiabatic flame temperature, which is itself a function of the products of

    combustion used. The adiabatic flame temperature is both difficult to quantify in practice

    and theoretically due to hysteresis in temperature sensors and due to the fact that

    incomplete combustion will change the molar ratio of products of combustion being

    produced.

    Furthermore the engine of choice for this competition has to be a four stroke, which

    makes it an Otto cycle engine for which the efficiency equation is given by

    where: r is the compression ratio

    is the specific heat ratio

    The compression ratio is specific to the engine design and higher values increase the

    engine efficiency, yet it is limited by the fact that higher ratios may cause the combustion

    in the cylinder to occur prematurely, this is a phenomenon called engine knock and it will

    adversely affect engine efficiency and life expectancy. Engine efficiency is in most part a

    function of this value since for air/fuel mixtures is usually taken to be 1.4, but it is

    important to note that this value rises with increasing temperature.vThis equation gives

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    19/128

    19

    the thermal efficiency of the engine, which is the heat energy it can actually extract from

    the products of combustion to transform into mechanical work.

    Non the less the efficiencies that can be derived from the above equations far exceed the

    real world efficiency measured from a real world engine which initially has an inefficient

    combustion, and then has to overcome friction, aerodynamic drag of gases inside the

    engine, parasitic losses from accessories, alternators and pumps, poor valve timing

    causing vacuums during the intake stroke or pressure loss during compression and

    expansion, all this while loosing heat through the cylinder walls. This real worldefficiency is termed the brake specific fuel consumption and is the ratio between the fuel

    consumed and power produced, and it is measured in

    Where: r is the rate of fuel consumed in g/s

    is the torque produced by the engine in NewtonMeters

    is the engine speed in radians/second

    Note that by knowing the energy density of the fuel in terms of its mass it is possible to

    calculate how much energy is actually stored in that fuel in order to get a number in terms

    of strict energy efficiency.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    20/128

    20

    Vehicle Efficiency

    Figure 8 Distribution of energy in a vehicle

    The energy that the engine can convert to mechanical work is limited by its thermal

    efficiency and the mechanical losses inside the engine, but not all the energy produced by

    the engine is available to energize the transmission, there are also parasitic losses that

    arise from using energy from the engine to pump fluids throughout the vehicle and create

    electricity in order to power the cars electrical system.

    The powertrain efficiency is given by the product of the efficiencies of all mechanical

    components starting at the engine and ending at the wheels axle. For our design this

    includes the engines thermodynamic efficiency, its mechanical efficiency, and that of the

    transmission plus the parasitic losses. It can also be calculated as the ratio between the

    powertrain output, and the power associated with the fuel consumption rate.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    21/128

    21

    After all this losses the power that is available at the wheels also has to overcome

    aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance forces, and the weight of the vehicle unless the

    surface is perfectly flat, together this make up the forces required for the vehicle to

    maintain a given speed, any power available at the wheels, in excess of this will be

    available for acceleration

    Steering System

    Defining the steering of our car was a challenging task and one that required plenty oftime and attention since this component is so crucial to the performance of any fuel-

    efficient vehicle. The steering is a key component for a few different reasons. First, it

    places the wheels in a manner that will reduce the rolling resistance force of the overall

    car. Also, this is the most important component of driver interface and must allow the

    pilot to perform the task in an efficient manner and most importantly, having a reliable

    steering will play a major role in the drivers safety.

    The first question that our group asked was weather we would opt for front wheel or back

    wheel steering. Since our engine is directly connected to the back tire, which is heavier

    and thicker for being an original scooter slick tire, we immediately discarded the option

    of rear steering. Once we had decided the steering would go on the front two wheels, we

    still had to analyze several different options available in the marker in order to find the

    most cost efficient one.

    Immediately after starting our literature survey, we considered having a hydraulic

    breaking system (mainly because it is the one recommended by the organizers of the

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    22/128

    22

    competition). The hydraulic was certainly a reliable one, however, our team did not find

    this option cost/weight efficient since it would require an extra system to pump the liquid

    necessary to make the calipers function. Therefore, we withdrew this option as well. The

    following steering option that caught our attention was steering by wire. This is by far the

    most weight efficient technique since steering mechanism is replaced by electronic

    control. At first, this sounded like a great option since removing all the usual components

    of a mechanical system would reduce the vehicles weight. Unfortunately, this method

    also had its downsides. First the amount of electricity to be provided by a battery to make

    the system work would require a battery that physically did not fit our car. Second,previous groups that performed tests with this kind of system proved a slow response to

    the drivers commands and it was unreliable. Since we did not have the resources to buy

    the system and test it ourselves, we trusted previous competitors assessments and opted

    for something more efficient. Our last frustrated attempt was to make a custom made

    system similar to last years, which resembled a pulley system to turn the spindles. Since

    our teams concept design envisions to provide steering in only one hand, rather than both,

    this option was forgotten.

    Finally, our group opted for a mechanical system. We evaluated different designs that

    were inspired in go-karts. The problem we encountered in this case was the availability of

    products that could be purchased online to match wheels. Most specifically, the diameter

    of the spindle axles were too thick to fit in any bicycle wheels that we could purchase.

    We had the option of manufacturing our own parts but that would require time and some

    resources that were not easily available to us. Therefore, we finally found something that

    would be perfect to our design; we decided to go with a steering system extremely similar

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    23/128

    23

    to recumbent bikes and tadpole trikes. All the details about the selected steering will be

    explained on the proposed design section of the report.

    Wheels

    Wheel selection to our car came almost simultaneously with the steering system since we

    needed to find a hub that would comply with the diameter of the spindle axle. As briefly

    mentioned above, our team spent countless hours looking for the perfect combination of

    wheels and bearings to our car. In order to find that, the following parameters were taken

    into account:

    The wheel must have optimal aerodynamics to minimize energy loss

    It had to fit our Michelin ultra low resistance tires (20 x 1.75)

    Made of lightweight material

    Strong enough to sustain loads and keep the tires in the correct place

    First we had to consider the option of having wheels with spokes against disk wheels.

    Unfortunately, due to the limited resources available to our team, manufacturing our own

    disk wheels had to be taken out of question, so we agreed on purchasing a pair of wheels

    already available in the market. It is important to remember that the back tire wheel was

    part of a package that was purchased with the engine and therefore, those decisions

    would only affect the front two. The previous two teams at FIU had used bicycle wheels,

    which are a viable option for the job especially cost-wise. Our team could not proceed

    with the same choice since the diameter of the axle of bicycle wheels was extremely

    small for our steering ideas. It was possible to get those custom made; however the price

    and the difficulty of incorporating a braking system to it forced our team to move on to a

    different option. Finally, we found the option of recumbent bikes and tadpole trikes,

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    24/128

    24

    which use a wheel with the specifications, that we needed and meets all the criteria

    described in the bullet points above.

    Another important decision relating to the wheels used in the car were the wheel

    bearings. Even though the drag produced by those is relatively small when compared to

    the ones produced by the tires, it helps to select the correct bearings in order to optimize

    your vehicles result. Since the vehicle will run at low speed and will yield a relatively

    low amount of loads, ball bearings seem to be the most viable option due to smaller

    frictional moment. Also, using ceramic bearings rather than steel would be beneficial

    since it reduces the overall weight and friction.

    Improving Vehicle Efficiency

    Since the thermodynamic efficiency is dictated by the engines compression ratio it is

    ideal to have higher values of such, but for any given fuel there exists a limit to which

    this compression can be achieved without self-igniting the air/fuel mix prematurely,

    which is known as engine knock, different types and grades of fuel have distinct anti-

    knock characteristics.

    It is important to also note that internal combustion engines are most efficient at a certain

    operational speed that is particular to each engine, with small engines having particularly

    high values for such ranging around 5000RPM to 7000RPM. Furthermore, the

    relationship between the engines operating RPM and the power/torque output is not

    linear, and there exists a point where the engine operates at maximum efficiency.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    25/128

    25

    Keeping the engine operating at this speed thus provides better power output

    characteristics.

    Being able to control how much fuel is fed to the engine for each combustion cycle will

    directly contribute to fuel economy by being able to provide the exact amount of fuel to

    keep combustion occurring at the proper stoichiometric ratio or in a lean-burn regime

    where there is a slight excess of air over which is required to maintain stoichiometry.

    This fine degree of control can be achieved by implementing fuel injection controlled by

    an onboard computer for the engine named an electronic control unit, or ECU, that makesdecisions based on its programming and input from different sensors that relay

    information about the engine timing, and the oxygen content of the intake and exhaust.

    Further efficiency can be gained by the use of bearings that produce less friction within

    the engine and in the hubs of free rolling wheels. Reducing or eliminating the electrical

    and fluid pumping loads on the engine can further cut parasitic losses. Reducing the mass

    of the vehicle offers a great advantage not only because it lowers the kinetic energy of the

    vehicle at any given speed and it offers an especially significant advantage when driving

    on an incline. Minimizing the effects of wind resistance, using low rolling resistance tires

    and avoiding drag due to the vehicles braking systems, can further reduce the drag forces

    acting against the vehicles motion.

    Finally it is crucial to understand that it is the driver and the driving style implemented

    that ultimately define the fuel economy that the vehicle will actually achieve, and it is

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    26/128

    26

    important to train the driver in the implementation of highly efficient driving methods.

    The most common method implemented in the competition is the drive-and-glide method

    where the driver accelerates the car to 20MPH, he then shuts off the engine, and allows

    the car to coast down to a speed of 10MPH, at which point the engine is restarted and

    accelerated again, this is all keeping in mind that the average velocity during the

    competition must remain above 15MPH.

    *+= >15?21 @.28646/

    This project would not have been possible without the teams effort to engineer

    587-:+8?5 \8. A.89-./ :N/L] U35/B 8? 98?9/A:5^ +B/35^ 3?B 3AA7+93:+8?5 :N3: =/ =/./ ?8:

    M3L+7+3. =+:N =N/? =/ 9N85/ :8 U/,+? :N+5 /?B/348._ 8-. :/9N?+937 F?8=7/B,/ 3U8-:

    4/N+97/ 5;5:/L5 =35 4/.; 7+L+:/B^ 35 =/77 35 8-. /WA/.+/?9/ +? L3?-M39:-.+?, 3?B

    M3U.+93:+8?"

    2-.+?, :N/ A.8I/9: 98?9/A:+8? 8-. +B/35 N3B :8 -?B/.,8 98?5:3?: ./4+5+8? U35/B 8?

    ?/=7; 39`-+./B F?8=7/B,/^ 3?B :N+5 :./?B 98?:+?-/B :N.8-,N8-: L3?-M39:-.+?, 35 =/

    ?8:+9/B :N3: 58L/ 8M 8-. +B/35 98-7B +?:/.M/./ =+:N 8:N/.5" [88F+?, M8. +B/35 +? :N/ =8.7B

    3.8-?B -5^ 3?B :N3?F5 :8 :N/ H?:/.?/:^ =/ =/./ 3U7/ :8 /WA/B+:/ :N+5 A.89/55 3?B 3..+4/ :8

    58-?B B/5+,?5"

    H: =35 3 4/.; +?:/./5:+?, /W/.9+5/ :8 7/3.? 3U8-: ?/= A3.:5^ :8875^ 3?B :/9N?+`-/5

    =/ =/./ ?8: M3L+7+3. =+:N" C8L/:+L/5 =/ 93? -?B/.5:3?B :N3: =/ ?//B 58L/:N+?, +?

    8.B/. :8 B/4/7op a function, but closer inspection reveals that those specialized parts,

    3?B :8875 39:-377; N34/ 3 ?3L/^ 3?B ;8- 93? M+?B :N/L 58L/=N/./ A.8U3U7; M8. 7/55

    /WA/?5/ :N3: +: =8-7B N34/ :3F/? :N/ :/3L :8 B/4/78A +:" @N+5 =35 4/.; +LA8.:3?: U/93-5/

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    27/128

    27

    =/ L3B/ +: 3 A8+?: :8 :.; :8 U-+7B :N/ 4/N+97/ M.8L 35 L3?; 5:3?B3.B+a/B A3.:5 35 =/ 98-7B

    A855+U7; M+?B"

    @N+5 A.8I/9: :3-,N: -5 :N3: :N/ B/4+7 +5 +? :N/ B/:3+75 +? 3 A.8I/9: 8M :N+5 5937/" C+?9/

    5/4/.37 5;5:/L5 N3B :8 98L/ :8,/:N/. 3?B =8.F +? -?+58?^ :N/; M+.5: L-5: 3758 =8.F

    A/.M/9:7; U; :N/L5/74/5^ 3?B 3998LA7+5N+?, :N+5 +5 ?8: 37=3;5 35 5:.3+,N:M8.=3.B 35 8?9/

    +L3,+?/B U; :N/ /?,+?//.^ :N/ B/4+7 :.-7; +5 +? :N/ B/:3+75"

    E/98L+?, 39`-3+?:/B =+:N /W+5:+?, 3AA7+93:+8?5 =35 3758 3 ,8B5/?B^ /5A/9+377;

    =N/? =/ U/93L/ M3L+7+3. =+:N :N/ 98?9/A: 8M ./9-LU/?: :.+9;97/5^ 5+?9/ :N+5 N/7A/B :N/

    :/3L B/4/78A :N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L +? 3 L-9N L8./ /MM/9:+4/ =3; :N3: =/ =8-7B N34/ U//?

    3U7/ :8 /?,+?//. 8:N/.=+5/^ U35/B 8? :N/ :/LA8.37 98?5:.3+?:5 +LA85/B"

    [/3.?+?, 3U8-: /?,+?/5 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ :/W:U88F =35 :.-7; 9N377/?,+?,^ 5A/9+M+9377;

    =+:N 3 KN+?/5/ 5988:/. /?,+?/ 7+F/ :N/ 8?/ =/ N3B^ 3?B :N/ =3; :N/; 3./ 5-AA85/B :8 U/

    =+./B =N+9N 5//L5 :8 U/ 3? +?:/.?/:1L;5:/.; 8M +:5 8=?^ 5+?9/ :N/./ U3./7; 3./ 3?;

    B+3,.3L5 :8 3998LA3?; :N/L_ 3BB+?, 3 M-/7 +?I/9:+8? 5;5:/L I-5: F/A: 3BB+?, :8 :N/

    98LA7/W+:;

    2/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; =35 3 B3-?:+?, :35F 8? +:5 8=?^ :.;+?, :8 M+,-./ 8-: =N3: +:5

    B+L/?5+8?5 N3B :8 U/ =+:N8-: N34+?, M+?+5N/B 4/.5+8?5 8M :N/ 98LA8?/?:5 +? +:5 +?:/.+8.

    =35 ?/3.7; +LA855+U7/ =+:N8-: .+5F+?, N34+?, 97/3.3?9/5 /?B+?, -A :88 78=^ 5A/9+377;

    5+?9/ B8=?5+a+?, =35 37=3;5 3 ,837 +? :N/ B/5+,? A.89/55^ /4/? +M =/ N3B M-77

    -?B/.5:3?B+?, 8M =N3: :N/ 4/N+97/ 3/.8B;?3L+95 5N8-7B U/ 7+F/"

    *-.:N/.L8./ 9N885+?, 3?B +LA7/L/?:+?, :N/ +B/37 L3?-M39:-.+?, L/:N8B5 :8 F//A

    985:5 78= =N+7/ L3W+L+a+?, L3:/.+37 A.8A/.:+/5 3?B 3AA/3.3?9/ 3AA/37 L/3?: =/ N3B :8

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    28/128

    28

    U/98L/ 39`-3+?:/B =+:N 3B43?9/B 98LA85+:/ L3?-M39:-.+?, :/9N?+`-/5^ 3?B 9N885/ :N/

    +B/37 L3:/.+375 :N3: =8-7B M39+7+:3:/ :N+5 A.89/55"

    @N+5 A.8I/9: N35 39N+/4/B :N/ ,837 8M ,.3?:+?, 8-. :/3L 3 ,78U37 7/3.?+?,

    /WA/.+/?9/^ :N3: L3B/ -5 +LA7/L/?: L3?; 8M :N/ 5F+775 =/ N34/ U//? /WA85/B :8 35

    engineering students, while forcing us to go beyond the classrooms scope and into real

    7+M/ 3AA7+93:+8?5^ =N+9N ?8: 8?7; +?97-B/ /?,+?//.+?, B/4/78AL/?:^ 3?B A3.: 58-.9+?,^ U-:

    3758 /W:/?B :8 M+?3?9+?,^ :+L/ L3?3,/L/?:^ 3?B A/.58?37 +?:/.39:+8?5 =+:N 5-AA7+/.5^

    5-A/.+8.5^ 3?B :/3L L/LU/.5^ :8 ?3L/ 3 M/="

    2. Design Alternatives

    2.1 Overview of conceptual design

    Weight:

    The target weight of our vehicle is less than 100 lbs, with a 150lb being a worst possible

    case scenario

    Body:

    The body and frame should combine to make a sturdy and structurally safe aerodynamic

    shell. Its construction must consist of a mixture of lightweight materials that can be

    shaped into complex parts: plastic sheets, aluminum, carbon, and glass-reinforced plastics

    are being considered. Rigidity and strength would be achieved by using honeycomb cores

    or tubular frame structures.

    Engine:

    Must be a small and fuel efficient engine under 50cc

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    29/128

    29

    Fuel Delivery System:

    Electronic fuel injection is preferred over carburetion to achieve stoichiometric

    combustion, since Maximum flame temperature occurs at the 14.7:1 air/fuel mixture

    combustion ratiovi

    Transmission:

    Must allow for the engine to be started under unloaded conditions even if the vehicle is in

    movement, and should at least provide one reduction gear to have the engine operating in

    the most efficient range of its power band while making the vehicle drivable in the speed

    range of 0-20 MPHStarter

    The starter must allow for a single person inside the cabin to turn the engine on without

    taking their hands of the steering wheel.

    Wheels and tires:

    Michelin designs and manufactures ultra low rolling resistance tires specifically for this

    competition, these are meant to fit over standard bicycle wheels, outfitting such wheel

    with ultra low friction bearings and making this whole assembly as light as possible

    would be ideal for the design.

    2.2 Proposed Design Alternatives

    2.2.1 Engine

    In order to select the engine it is necessary to first examine the power

    requirements to move our vehicle at the speed required by the competition. For the

    preliminary analysis there will be several assumptions made, and these will be clearly

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    30/128

    30

    stated. The power requirements of our vehicle for any given speed are given by the

    product of the sum of the forces acting against our vehicles motion and the vehicles

    velocity and acceleration; therefore the power calculations were made using the

    following parameters:

    1)23- 4 5 6/7+ #. 8)")(-+-"7

    FrontalAreaOfCar 0.42

    PercentGrade 2

    VehicleMass 136.36Drivetrain efficiency 0.8

    Tire rolling resistance coefficient 0.0025

    Brake and Steering Resistance 0.003

    DragCoefficient 0.15AirDensity 1.225

    Wheel Radius 0.254

    It was assumed that the total mass for the car, and a driver with an average mass

    of 150lbs, will be a maximum of approximately 300 lbs, or its equivalent value of 136.6

    kg. CRRis found from the Michelin specifications for the ultra low resistance tire that will

    be used in the car. The density of 1.225 for air is using standard temperature and pressure

    (STP) guidelines. CD, the coefficient of drag, was selected as 0.15 considering a worst-

    case scenario of an aerodynamic body design, based on previous competitors with similar

    body shapes that have tested their cars and calculated this value. The area used of 0.42 m2

    is an approximation of the frontal area of the car, according to preliminary solid works

    models of possible designs of our car. Furthermore, R is the outer radius of the Michelin

    tire that will be used in the car. Also, an assumed drivetrain efficiency of 80%, was again

    chosen assuming a relatively inefficient transmission for the vehicle to err on the high

    range of our numbers, and prevent an underpowered vehicle. The brake and steering

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    31/128

    31

    resistance coefficient was estimated after doing extensive research on previous

    competitors cars.

    The next step in the analysis is to calculate the forces acting on the prototype

    according to the speed of the same. Keeping in mind the rules of the competition that

    require an average speed of 15 mph, increments of 2 mph were used to calculate the three

    component of total force:

    As shown above, the force (Fdrag) that acts against the vehicle can be divided in

    several different components. First FRR, or force due to rolling resistance, which is

    represented as the sum in between tire, steering and brake resistances. Also, another force

    that acts against the car at all times is the force due to air friction, F air. Last, we have

    Finclinewhich is due to the weight of the car parallel to the the roads incline, since there is

    no information about the topography of the track, a small assumption must be made

    considering that the competition is takingn place in a track built in the urban setting of a

    Downtown Houston park.

    After calculating all the forces that act against the car, it is possible to begin the

    calculations for the power required to move the vehicle. The power required to maintain

    the car at this constant speed was found using the following formula:

    !"#$= 0.5 %& ' (2

    !)) =* + (%)) +%,-))

    !#./0#.1

    =* + 23

    !4$"+= !

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    32/128

    32

    \O]

    Once the power to keep the car moving at a constant speed has been calculated both in

    Watts and horsepower (diving the above formula by a conversion factor), It is possible to

    continue with the calculations of the kinetic energy and power required to accelerate the

    vehicle. After researching average acceleration times for the same engine in similarly

    sized vehicles and learning that it usually takes it 8s to get from zero to 20MPH, under

    full throttle, we decided to use this time to do the following calculations:

    \X]

    \O]

    Finally, we can use these values to calculate the total power required by the car in

    Watts and in Horsepower. With this information, we are able to select a properly sized

    engine that we will try to make as efficient as possible to fit the needs of the competition.

    1)23- 9 5 !*-":; )*, 8#

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    33/128

    33

    Y5+?, :N/ ?-LU/.5 3U84/^ +: +5 A855+U7/ :8 A78: ,.3AN5 8M :N/ ?-LU/.5 M8-?B :8

    U/::/. -?B/.5:3?B :N/ ./73:+8?5N+A5 U/:=//? :N/ 4/789+:; 8M :N/ 93. 3?B :N/ B/L3?B M8.

    A8=/. 3?B /?/.,;"

    ?/:>"- @ 5 A"): B7 C-3#=/+;

    From the graph shown above, it is possible to analyze the main sources of

    resistance towards the movement of the car. From Figure (3), the drag force will increase

    with an increase in velocity. However, it is important to note that this increase is

    relatively small. An increase of 4 N in between the velocities of 2 mph to 24 mph makes

    it clear that the main source of force resisting vehicular movement does not come from

    aerodynamic drag. Furthermore, the components of Fdrag, which are show in Appendix A,

    show that Finclineis responsible for about 70% of the total force. Since we can not control

    the tracks topography, we can say that the total weight of the car is the major component

    causing inefficiency on a vehicle that is not traveling on a level surface.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    34/128

    34

    ?/:>"- 4D 5 E#

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    35/128

    35

    The GY6 style engines are popular in the small scooter, ATV and Go-kart

    markets. There are various performance upgrade parts and documented modifications for

    this type of engines available, including fuel injection conversions. This engine has a

    higher compression ratio, which is something desired for higher thermodynamic

    efficiency. The power rating and maximum torque are also the highest in the list with

    almost a 33% advantage over the comparable Honda GXH50. On the downside; its fuel

    consumption is about 10% higher. This engine is sold ready for a drum brake setup, and

    comes equipped with an electric starter, and a continuously variable transmission (CVT).

    The Honda engines are made in different sizes from 25cc to 50cc, and include a recoilstarter, and a centrifugal clutch. For the competitions purposes this starter would have to

    be changed to an electric type in order to make it possible for the driver to turn the engine

    on and off from the cockpit while the vehicle is in motion. On the other hand the

    centrifugal clutch might come in useful for the development of a discrete reduction

    gearing system with automatic engagement. Nonetheless the amount of support material

    and documented modifications for this type of engines is also scarce, and the

    nonexistence of an aftermarket part market means that tuning and performance part

    upgrades would require more development and custom manufacturing.

    Taking these factors into account and the expected power requirements of our

    vehicle, the team has decided to opt for the GY6 engine.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    36/128

    36

    ?/:>"- 44 5 !*:/*- 1#8 C/-"- 49 5 !*:/*- 7/,- B/-"- 4F 5 !*:/*- #* G+)*,

    2.2.2 Clutch and Transmission

    The GY6 engine comes with a proprietary centrifugal clutch and a continuously

    variable transmission, or CVT. This transmission consists of a pulley on the engine shaft,

    and another on the output shaft with a belt transmitting power between them. The way

    different gear ratios are achieved is by having the pulleys be made of independent conical

    halves (sheaves) that can move relative to each other increasing or decreasing the gap

    between them so that the belt sits at different pitch circles, the ratio between the two pitch

    circles would give us the gear ratio for that specific configuration, to obtain higher

    understanding of the device is an exploded view in the diagram below:

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    38/128

    38

    ?/:>"- 4H 5 E)"+7 &"-)',#

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    39/128

    39

    Changing the weight of the rollers, and the stiffness of the clamping spring can control

    the rate at which the changes occur. This is unfortunately something that we cannot

    model mathematically unless we know several dimensions, and material properties about

    the transmission that are currently not available. Most of the data that will help us

    optimize this transmission will come from obtaining direct measurements through

    experimentation and what is referred to as tuning in the racing world.

    The final drive ratio is the product of this reduction and two more that occur

    inside a gearbox after the CVT, the stock gear ratios for these are in the table below and

    the overall gear ratio describes the overall range:Table 3 Transmission gearing range

    The centrifugal clutch consists of two main parts; the clutch swing arm assembly,

    which rotates with the driven pulley, as the angular speed increases the arms swingoutward due to the centrifugal force and ultimately engage with the clutch bell. The

    clutch bell being linked to the CVTs output shaft delivers the power to the gearbox and

    after the compound reduction; it delivers it to the wheel. This clutch is extremely

    important and needs to be tuned to achieve the following goals:

    1. The clutch must be disengaged when the engine is idling, to comply with the

    competitions guidelines

    2. The clutch must engage quickly as the engine is throttled and must disengage

    instantly when the engine is turned off. These two things are extremely important

    for transmission efficiency and to enable the vehicle to coast freely without being

    CVT Drive Ratio 0.8-2.0

    First Gear Box Reduction 3.4

    Second Gear Box Reduction 3.25

    Overall Gear Ratio 8.84-26.1

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    40/128

    40

    subjected to braking forces due to compression in the engine piston when the

    engine is off.

    To achieve this goal it is necessary to try different clutch springs in order to find

    the appropriate stiffness for the ones that will satisfy the design.

    Unfortunately while a CVT offers very simple operation with virtually no driver

    interaction, it is important to note that these transmissions can be very inefficient, with

    values as low as 75%, mainly due to belt slippage, other sources that contribute to this

    inefficiencies are friction at surface contacts of bushings and bearings, which the team

    will attempt to reduce once the engine is physically dissected, and the parts measured, inorder to assess if suitable replacements can be found

    2.2.3 Fuel Delivery System

    The engines above come carbureted and the team is considering having a fuel-

    injected design that would be satisfied by implementing small engine fuel injection and

    ECU kits sold by Ecotrons or MBE Motorsports.

    ?/:>"- 4I 5 ?>-3 J*K-=+/#* L/+

    The kits sold by both companies come equipped with an electric fuel pump to

    pressurize the fuel before it reaches the injector, but using this pump goes against the

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    41/128

    41

    rules and regulations of the competition and a pre-pressurized fuel delivery system must

    be implemented instead.

    The guidelines stipulate that the maximum pressure this system can have is 5bar

    or 72.5psi, furthermore the pressurized air must be stored in a clear container, and be

    filled through a Schrader valve, the system must include safety valves, shutoff valves,

    regulator, and gages, and everything must be easily drained, and removed from the

    vehicle for inspection purposes.

    The vehicles system will use a regular soda bottle outfitted with a Schrader valve

    to accumulate air at up to 70psi, a safety relief valve will be set to release any excesspressure, and a shutoff valve will be placed inline, as per competition guidelines. This

    pressure will then be reduced to 36psi with a regulator, to satisfy the operational pressure

    requirements of the injector, and will then be routed to the competition-sanctioned fuel

    tank. The pressurized fuel then travels through a line equipped with a shutoff valve, and

    fuel-filter, before reaching the injector. A diagram of this system must be supplied to

    Shell for the competition and can be seen below.

    ?/:>"- 4M 5 N#(83-+- ?>-3 A-3/B-"; G;7+-( A/):")(

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    42/128

    42

    @N/ 355/LU7/B M-/7 5;5:/L 5//L5 :8 N34/ 58L/ A./55-./ 7/3F =/ N34/ ;/: :8

    B/:/9:^ 3?B :N/ 487-L/ 8M 3+. +? :N/ A./55-.+a/B #(8a 58B3 U8::7/ A.84/B :8 U/ +?5-MM+9+/?:

    :8 L3+?:3+? 399/A:3U7/ A./55-./ B8=?5:./3L 8?9/ :N/ 4374/ =35 8A/?" @N/ 3+. :3?F =+77

    U/ /W9N3?,/B M8. 3 $ [+:/. U8::7/ +? 8.B/. :8 98LA/?53:/ M8. :N/ 7/3F5 3?B :N/ 487-L/:.+9

    /WA3?5+8? 8M :N/ ,35 B8=?5:./3L"

    ?/:>"- 4O5 ?>*=+/#*)3 .>-3 7;7+-(

    2.2.4 Fuel

    Two types of liquid fuel are available for spark-ignited engines, and the engine

    and fuel injection kit can handle both types of fuel, these are 87-octane regular gasoline

    and pure ethanol (E100).

    Regular gasoline has an octane rating of 87 while pure ethanol has an equivalent

    slightly over 115. The higher the octane rating, the higher compression the engine can

    achieve before the air/fuel mix self-ignites creating engine knock which will hinder

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    43/128

    43

    performance and create more wear on the engine. On the other hand gasoline has a higher

    energy density when compared to E100.

    The team will choose to run 87-octane regular gasoline in our vehicle because

    although it is recommended to modify the engine to achieve higher compression it is not

    expected that this will happen due to time constraints, therefore we choose gasoline due

    to its effectiveness and higher energy density that ethanol. Note that to this date the team

    has not been able to find tables or equations that can help predict how much compression

    an engine can achieve before inducing knock when using fuel with a given octane rating.

    2.2.5 Starter

    The engine considered comes with an electric starter, which is needed so that the

    driver and/or computer can control when the engine turns on and off, allowing the car to

    cruise with the engine off and then be started from within the cockpit when the speed

    falls below a predetermined level.

    2.2.6 Electrical System

    The Vehicles electrical system consists of a 12v charging system comprised of a

    battery and the AC magneto/stator integrated in the engine. The battery selected is the

    smallest Lithium Ion battery manufactured for motosports and weights 0.5lbs at a cost of

    50$, while an equivalent Lead/acid battery would have costed $30 but would have

    weighted 3lbs.

    The wiring harness was obtained from the same scooter that the engine was pulled

    from, and was later simplified, spliced, and readapted to our vehicles needs. The

    diagram below accurately represents the final product, and it is ready to be submitted to

    the competitions authorities for review. The team made sure to include kill switches for

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    44/128

    44

    the engine accessible from the cockpit and from the vehicles exterior, plus a dedicated

    toggle switch for the ECU, buttons were also included to spool the starter engine while

    illuminating the starter signal light, and another one to sound the horn.

    ?/:>"- 4P 5 C-Q/=3- R/"/*: ,/):")(

    b8:/ :N3: :N/ >7/9:.8?+9 *-/7 H?I/9:+8? 5;5:/L 98L/5 =+:N 3? /W:/?5+4/ 3?B

    98LA7/W N3.?/55 8M +:5 8=?^ U-: :N/ 98??/9:+8?5 5N8=? 399-.3:/7; A+9:-./ N8= U8:N

    N3.?/55/5 +?:/.39: =+:N /39N 8:N/."

    2.2.7 Tires

    As for the rear tire the GY6 engine under consideration uses a distinct type of

    tires that is designed for scooters, and compatible wheels include a hub for an expanding

    internal drum brake that is built into the engine, these must also have a distinct spline

    pattern that must match the one on the engines output shaft, and :N/5/ :=8 A3::/.?5 3./

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    45/128

    45

    ?8: 98?5+5:/?: U/:=//? 377 #%0cSE /?,+?/5 8. :N/ =N//75 :N3: 3./ 3B4/.:+5/B 35

    98LA3:+U7/^ =N+9N 98LA7+93:/5 :N/ +55-/ 8M M+?B+?, 98../9: L3:9N/5.

    The options to reduce rolling resistance in the rear tire would be to procure a high

    pressure slick racing tire meant for scooters, for which there are only two manufacturers

    worldwide, Savatech and Heideneau, and which would also produce a heavier assembly

    which would not be as efficient as the one achieved with the Michelin tires, but to be able

    to put this type of tire on the engine the team would have to be willing to invest time and

    money in manufacturing it. So far the team has opted to procure the scooter racing

    Heideneu tire and the wheel was inexpensively purchased along with the engine toguarantee a proper mate, but it was later realized that it is made of iron, so finding a cast

    aluminum one would be the a viable improvement in weight reduction. Below is an

    image of the slick tire mounted on the engine:

    ?/:>"- 4@ 5 !*:/*-

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    46/128

    46

    2.2.8 Frame

    @N/ B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?, 8M :N/ M.3L/ =35 -?B8-U:/B7; 35 /W:/?5+4/ 35 +:

    =35 9N377/?,+?," b8?/:N/7/55^ +: =35 +LA/.3:+4/ :N3: L-9N /MM8.: =/?: +?:8 :N+5 A3.: 8M :N/

    A.8I/9: B-/ :8 +:5 +LA8.:3?9/" H: =35 97/3. :N3: :N/ M.3L/ 8M :N/ 93. =8-7B U/ :N/ .88: 8M

    :N/ 93.^ 35 377 :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 =8-7B U/ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/" *-.:N/.L8./^ :N/

    M.3L/ =8-7B ,+4/ :N/ 93. +:5 5:.-9:-.37 +?:/,.+:; 3?B F//A :N/ B.+4/. 53M/ +? :N/ 935/ 8M 3?

    399+B/?:"

    J//A+?, +? L+?B :N3: U/93-5/ :N+5 +5 3 5-A/. L+7/3,/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ :N/ 93. N3B :8

    U/ 35 7+,N: 35 A855+U7/ =N+7/ 3758 U/+?, 53M/" @N/ M+.5: 5:/A +? B/5+,?+?, :N/ 93. =35 :8

    39F?8=7/B,/ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? ./`-+./L/?:5 M8. :N/ 9N355+5^ 3?B B/5+,? 3.8-?B :N/L"

    Fortunately, the competitions only r/`-+./L/?:5 M8. :N/ 9N355+5 =/./ :N3: :N/ .877 U3.

    extend 5cm around the drivers helmet, and be large enough to protect the driver in the

    935/ 8M 3 9877+5+8?" O+:N 58 M/= B/5+,? ./`-+./L/?:5^ :N/./ =35 A7/?:; 8M M.//B8L :8

    B/5+,? :N/ M.3L/^ 8. 58 :N/ :/3L :N8-,N:" @N.8-,N8-: :N/ B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?,

    process many constrictions were found that reduced the teams choices for the design of

    :N/ M.3L/" @N/5/ 98?5:.3+?:5 =+77 U/ L/?:+8?/B 377 :N.8-,N8-: :N/ /WA73?3:+8? 8M :N/

    B/5+,? A.89/55"

    R?9/ :N/ ./`-+./L/?:5 =/./ F?8=?^ +?+:+37 B/5+,?5 U/,3?" @N/ M+.5: 98?5+B/.3:+8?

    was to follow in the previous teams footsteps and build a chassis out of aluminum and

    =/7B :N/ :-U/5 :8,/:N/." H? :N/ +?:/./5: 8M /W9/7+?, :N/ A./4+8-5 :/3L^ M-.:N/. ./5/3.9N =35

    L3B/ :N3: 7/3B :8 98?5+B/.3:+8?5 8M 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?, =N+7/ -5+?, 93.U8? M+U/. A73:/5

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    47/128

    47

    =+:N 98LA85+:/5 +? U/:=//? \M+,-./ dd] 35 :N/ U35/ 8M :N/

    9N355+5" *8. :N/ 98LA85+:/^ L3?; 9N8+9/5 =/./ 98?5+B/./B

    +?97-B+?, U3753^ U+.9N^ N8?/;98LU ?8L/W^ 3?B M83L" @N/

    3L8-?: 8M L3:/.+375 3778=/B M8. L3?; 8A:+8?5 :N3: 43.+/B +?

    A.+9/^ =/+,N:^ 3?B 5:./?,:N" Y7:+L3:/7;^ U/93-5/ :N/ :/3L =35

    -?3U7/ :8 M+?B 3 A73:/ 3?B 98LA85+:/ 98LU+?3:+8? A.+9/B

    -?B/. e#))) :N3: 53:+5M+/B :N/+. B/5+./B A3.3L/:/.5^ :N/

    9N8+9/ =35 L3B/ :8 U-+7B :N/ M.3L/ 8-: 8M 93.U8? M+U/.

    :-U+?," @N+5 7/3B :8 98?9/.? 35 =/7B+?, =35 ?8 78?,/. 3?

    8A:+8? 35 +: +5 +LA855+U7/ :8 =/7B 93.U8? M+U/." *8.:-?3:/7;^ ./5/3.9N -?4/+7/B 3 4/.;

    -?+`-/ 3?B +??843:/ L/:N8B :8 I8+? 3?; :;A/ 8. 5+a/ 8M :-U+?," "- 9D 5 S#*-;=#(2

    G+">=+>"-

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    48/128

    48

    @N/ A.89/55 8M B/5+,?+?, :N/ 93. =35 8?/ 8M

    L-9N :.+37 3?B /..8." C/4/.37 B/5+,?5 M8. :N/

    93. =/./ L3B/ -?:+7 3 M+?37 B/5+,? =35 9N85/?"

    >4/? :N/?^ +: =35 B/9+B/B :N3: :N/ 3:1:+L/ M+?37

    B/5+,? ./`-+./B 3BB+:+8?37 5-AA8.:5" @N/ 4/.;

    M+.5: B/5+,? 93? U/ 5//? +? M+,-./ dd" @N+5

    B/5+,? 5/.4/B 35 3 5:3.:+?, A8+?: M8. M-:-./

    B/5+,?5^ U-: =35 ?8?/:N/7/55 B+593.B/B 35 :N/ :/3L M/7: :N3: 3 M-?9:+8?37 M.3L/ 98-7B U/

    39N+/4/B =+:N L8./ 5+LA7+5:+9 98?M+,-.3:+8?5 3?B 7/55 L3:/.+375" *.8L :N/./^ 3 5/98?B

    B/5+,? =35 L3B/ 3?B 93? U/ 5//? +? M+,-./dd" Q5 /4+B/?9/B U; :N/ M+,-./^ 3M:/. :N/ +?+:+37

    B/5+,?^ L8./ 5+LA7+5:+9 B/5+,?5 =/./ 58-,N:" @N+5 B/5+,? M/3:-./5 :=8 M.8?: B+3,8?375 :N3:

    98??/9: 3: :N/ M.8?: 4/.:+9/5 3?B :N/ :8A 4/.:+9/5 8M :N/ .877 U3." *-.:N/.L8./^ 3

    `-3B.+73:/.37 .877 U3. =35 B/5+,?/B 5+?9/ 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/.5 =8-7B U/ -5/B 3?B :N85/

    93??8: U/ L87B/B +?:8 3 9+.9-73. 5N3A/" E/93-5/ :N/ /?,+?/ N3B 37./3B; U//? 5/7/9:/B 3:

    :N+5 A8+?:^ :N/ 98??/9:+?, A8+?:5 =/./ F?8=?^ 3?B =/./ 98?5+B/./B =N/? -5/B M8. :N+5

    B/5+,?" @N/ :=8 B+3,8?37 78=/. :-U/5 :N3? 93? U/ 5//? +? 3 93?:+7/4/. 5:3:/ =8-7B 5/.4/

    35 :N/ 78=/. L8-?:+?, A8+?:5 M8. :N/ /?,+?/" [+F/=+5/^ :N/ N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ 7893:/B 3: :N/

    M3. U39F 8M :N/ M.3L/ =8-7B 5/.4/ 35 :N/ -AA/. L8-?:+?, A8+?: M8. :N/ /?,+?/" @N+5

    mounting point would be to the tires shock absorber. As pointed out in the description of

    :N/ /?,+?/^ :N+5 98??/9:+8? +5 ?8: +? :N/ 9/?:/. A73?/ 8M :N/ L8:8. 3?B :+./ 98?M+,-.3:+8?"

    @N/ B/9+5+8? =35 :N/? L3B/ :8 A.89//B 3?B A-.9N35/ %( M//: 8M 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?," @N/

    A-.9N35/ =35 L3B/ M8. ( :-U/5 8M ( M//:^ /39N :-U/ 985:+?, I-5: 3U8-: e#))^ M8. 3 :8:37 8M

    I-5: -?B/. e())"

    ?/:>"- 94 5 ?/"7+ ?")(- A-7/:*

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    49/128

    49

    @N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./5 5N8= 58L/ 8M :N/

    A./7+L+?3.; 5+L-73:+8?5 A/.M8.L/B" @N+5 M+,-./5

    5N8= 58L/ 3?37;5+5 ./5-7:5 :N3: 5N8= M39:8. 8M

    53M/:;^ :8:37 B+5A739/L/?:^ 3?B 5:./55/5"

    ?/:>"- 9F T*)3;7/7 U4V

    ?/:>"- 99 5 G-=#*, ?")(- A-7/:*

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    50/128

    50

    ?/:>"- 9H T*)3;7/7 U9V

    ?/:>"- 9I T*)3;7/7 UFV

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    51/128

    51

    ?/:>"- 9M T*)3;7/7 UHV

    ?/:>"- 9O T*)3;7/7 UIV

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    52/128

    52

    ?/:>"- 9P T*)3;7/7 UMV

    According to this analysis, the tentative dimensions of the carbon fiber tubes

    showed that the structure would be quite overbuilt, and choosing a smaller pipe diameter

    might have been a good option to reduce size, weight, and cost. Nonetheless the team

    decided against this in order to be conservative, since we knew that our simulations did

    not accurately represent the anisotropic nature of the material or the joining method to be

    used.

    R?9/ :N+5 B/5+,? =35 L3B/^ 3?B :N/ :-U/5 N3B 3..+4/B^ :N/ :/3L 9377/B :N/ B.+4/.

    3?B U/,3? :/5:+?, :N/ 9-../?: 355-L/B B+L/?5+8?5 3?B M.3L/ 98?M+,-.3:+8?^ 35 B/A+9:/B +?

    :N/ M+,-./" 28+?, :N+5 A.84/B :8 U/ :N/ 98../9: 9N8+9/ 35 :/5:+?, :N+5 98?M+,-.3:+8? =+:N

    :N/ 39:-37 B.+4/. ./4/37/B 5/4/.37 9N3?,/5 ?//B/B :8 U/ L3B/" *+.5:7;^ :N/ -AA/.

    N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ -5/B M8. :N/ .877 U3. A.84/B :8 U/ :88 5L377" @N+5 93-5/B :N/ B+3,8?375 :N3:

    connect to the upper vertices of the roll bar to collide with the drivers helmet and thus

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    53/128

    53

    ?8: 3778=+?, :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:" C/98?B7;^

    :N/ N/+,N: 8M :N/ .877 U3. 3758 A.84/B :8

    U/ +?5-MM+9+/?:^ 35 +: B+B ?8: A.84+B/ :N/

    97/3.3?9/ M.8L :N/ N/7L/: ./`-+./B U;

    :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?" S8./84/.^ :N/ +?+:+37

    allocated length for the drivers

    98LA3.:L/?: 8M ' M//: ( +?9N/5 A.84/B

    :8 U/ -??/9/553.+7; 78?," C+?9/

    :N/ B.+4/. +5 ' M//: :377 3?B

    93A3U7/ 8M U/?B+?, N/. F?//5 3778=+?, :N/ 98LA3.:L/?: :8 U/ /4/? 5N8.:/.^ :N/ +?+:+37

    377893:/B 7/?,:N =35 ./B-9/B"

    O+:N 377 :N/5/ 8U5/.43:+8?5^ 3 ?/= 9N355+5 =35 B/5+,?/B" [3:/. 8? :N+5 ?/= B/5+,? =8-7B

    U/ B/5+,?3:/B :N/ M+?37 B/5+,?" @N+5 ?/= B/5+,? 98?5+5:/B +? 9N3?,+?, :N/ 98??/9:+8? 8M

    :N/ M.8?: B+3,8?375 :8 :N/ N8.+a8?:37 :-U/ U/?/3:N^ .3:N/. :N3? :N/ 98.?/." @N+5 =35 B8?/

    U/93-5/ +: 3778=/B M8. 7/55 L3:/.+37 :8 U/ -5/B 35 :N/ ./`-+./B :-U/5 =8-7B U/ 5N8.:/. 3?B

    3758 U/93-5/ :N+5 ?/= 98?M+,-.3:+8? =8-7B 39:-377; =+B/? :N/ B+5:3?9/ M.8L :N/ B+3,8?37

    :-U/5 3?B :N-5 3778=+?, L8./ .88L M8. :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:" E; B8+?, :N+5 3?B =+B/?+?, :N/

    M.8?: 8M :N/ M.3L/ U; L/./7; $ +?9N/5 A.84/B :8 U/ L8./ :N3? /?8-,N M8. :N/ N/7L/: :8 M+:"

    Q758^ 35 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ M+,-./^ :N/ 7/?,:N 8M :N/ B.+4/. 98LA3.:L/?: =35 ./B-9/B :8 '&

    inches, less than the drivers height of 5 feet. The driver would bend her knees and fit,

    ?8?/:N/7/55" @N+5 3778=/B :N/ 93. :8 U/ 5N8.:/. =N+9N 3778=/B M8. U/::/. 3/.8B;?3L+95^

    7/55 L3:/.+37 M8. :N/ U8B; 3?B M.3L/^ 3?B 7/55 9N3?9/5 M8. :N/ :/3L :8 /W9//B :N/

    ?/:>"- 9@ 5 W7/*: A"/B-" +# !X+")=+

    A/(-*7/#*7

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    54/128

    54

    98LA/:+:+8? ./`-+./L/?:5 8M 3 L3W+L-L 7/?,:N" [35:7;^ 3: :N+5 A8+?: :N/ ./3. B+3,8?375

    N3B :8 U/ ./L84/B 35 +: =35 B+5984/./B :N3: :N/; 9877+B/B =+:N :N/ /?,+?/" @N+5 =35 3

    :./L/?B8-5 84/.5+,N: U; :N/ :/3L =N+9N L/3?: :N3: =+:N8-: :N85/ 5-AA8.:5^ :N/ :-U/5 :N3:

    98??/9: B+./9:7; :8 :N/ /?,+?/ =8-7B U/ +? M-77 93?:+7/4/. 5:3:-/5" @N+5 93-5/B :N/ :/3L :8

    M/3. :N3: :N/ :8.`-/ =8-7B U/ /?8-,N :8 93-5/ /?8-,N 8M 3 5N/3. :8 L3F/ :N/ /A8W; ./5+?

    :N3: N/7B :N/ A3.:5 :8,/:N/. M3+7" @N+5 =35 73:/. 3BB./55/B U; N34+?, :N/5/ B+3,8?375

    98??/9: 3: :N/ L+BB7/ 8M :N/ .877 U3. .3:N/. :N3? :N/ 78=/. 4/.:+9/5" @N+5 735: L+?-:/

    ./+?M8.9/L/?: 93? U/ 5//? 97/3.7; +? :N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./"

    ?/:>"- FD 5 !*:/*- Y-/*.#"=-(-*+7

    2.2.9 Steering system

    While researching and designing the steering system, the team took into

    consideration the radius of turning and how it would impact the size and design of the

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    55/128

    55

    frame and body of the car. When considering the steering system, the group took into

    consideration Ackermann turning where the larger the distance between the front and

    back wheels of the car, the larger the radius of turning is. This goes against the teams

    goal as they strive for the lowest turning radius for highest efficiency. Also, having a

    lower turning radius means the wheels need to turn more in order to compensate, and this

    in turn forces the car design to be wider in order to allow for the extra space needed for

    the wheels to turn.

    2.2.10 Body

    X-5: 7+F/ :N/ M.3L/^ :N/ U8B; =35 3 4/.; 98LA7+93:/B 35A/9: 8M :N/ 93." S-9N /?/.,; +5

    785: :8 M.+9:+8? =+:N :N/ 3+.^ L3F+?, +: +LA/.3:+4/ :N3: :N/ B+MM+9-7:+/5 U/ 84/.98L/ =+:N :N/

    U/5: ./5-7:5 A855+U7/" b8?/:N/7/55^ +: +5 +LA/.3:+4/ :8 53; :N/ :/3L =35 A./55/B 8? :+L/

    3?B :N3: B+B ?8: 3778= :N/ :/3L :8 B/5+,? :N/ U8B; 35 /W:/?5+4/ 3?B :N8.8-,N7; 35

    8.+,+?377; +?:/?B/B" R.+,+?37 A73?5 +?97-B/B .-??+?, B.3, 5+L-73:+8?5 8? Q?5;5 58M:=3./

    +? 8.B/. :8 M+?B :N/ 98/MM+9+/?: 8M B.3,^ 3?B .-??+?, =+?B :-??/7 5+L-73:+8?5 8? 3 5937/B

    L8B/7 +? 8.B/. :8 98LA3./ :N/ A.39:+937 ./5-7:5 =+:N :N/ 8?/5 M.8L :N/ 5+L-73:+8?5"

    *-.:N/.L8./^ :N/ A3?:N/. .3,/ V$ :/3L 5-,,/5:/B :8 :/3L AN3?:8L :8 U/,+? 3?B 98LA7/:/

    :N/ B/5+,? 8M :N/ 9N355+5 U/M8./ :N/; U/,3? B/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; 8M :N/ 93." @N+5

    ./98LL/?B3:+8? =35 A-: :8 A.39:+9/ 3?B +: =35 :N/ .+,N: 9N8+9/" 2/5+,?+?, :N/ U8B; 8M

    :N/ 93. U/M8./ B/5+,?+?, :N/ +?:/.+8. =8-7B N34/ U//? 3 N-,/ L+5:3F/ :N3: +?/4+:3U7;

    =8-7B N34/ 7/3B :8 :N/ U8B; 9877+B+?, =+:N :N/ 8?/ 8M :N/ L3?; +?:/.+8. 98LA8?/?:5"

    Q7:N8-,N B8+?, :N/ M.3L/ M+.5: =35 98?5+B/./B :N/ U/5: +B/3^ :N+5 ./5-7:/B +? A-5N+?, U39F

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    56/128

    56

    377 :N/ =8.F 8? :N/ U8B; -?:+7 :N/ M.3L/ =35 98LA7/:/B" E/93-5/ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? =35 :8

    U/ N/7B :N/ M+.5: =//F 8M QA.+7^ :N/ 93. N3B :8 U/ 5N+AA/B U; :N/ 735: =//F 8M S3.9N^ 3?B

    :N/ M.3L/ =35 ?8: 98LA7/:/B -?:+7 /3.7; S3.9N^ :N+5 ./5-7:/B +? 3 5L377 =+?B8= 8M 8?7; 3

    M/= =//F5 :8 98LA7/:/7; B/5+,? 3?B L3?-M39:-./ :N/ U8B; M.8L 59.3:9N"

    >4/? :N8-,N :N/ :/3L B+B ?8: /WA/9: :8 L3F/ 3 M+?37 B/9+5+8? 8? :N/ U8B; 8M :N/ 93. -?:+7

    :N/ M.3L/ =35 98LA7/:/^ L3?; B+MM/./?: U8B; B/5+,?5 =/./ L3B/ =+:N :N/ +?:/?:+8? 8M

    :/5:+?, :N/L 3?B B/:/.L+?+?, =N+9N N3B :N/ U/5: 3/.8B;?3L+95" E; B8+?, :N+5^ :N/

    A.89/55 8M B/5+,?+?, 3?B L3?-M39:-.+?, 98-7B U/ /WA/B+:/B" *-.:N/.L8./^ U; B/5+,?+?,

    :N+5 /3.7; +? :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ L-9N /WA/.+/?9/ =8-7B U/ ,3+?/B +? :N/ A.89/55 8M

    B/5+,?+?, 98LA7/W 5N3A/5" @N+5 A.84/B :8 U/ :N/ 935/" Q7:N8-,N :N/ +?+:+37 B/5+,?5 =/./

    ?8: A+9F/B^ :N/ 8MM+9+37 B/5+,? =35 L3B/ A855+U7/ U/93-5/ 8M :N/ /WA/.+/?9/ 3?B A.39:+9/

    M.8L :N/ /3.7+/. L8B/75"

    H?+:+377;^ :N.// B+MM/./?: L8B/75 =/./ L3B/" @N/5/ :N.// L8B/75^ 35 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/

    ?/W: M+,-./^ 3./ 377 L3B/ =+:N 377 :N.// =N//75 +?5+B/ :N/ U8B;" @N/ L3+? B+MM/./?9/

    U/:=//? :N/ :N.// +5 N8= :N/ ./3.5 /?B" Z/5/3.9N ./4/37/B :N3: :N/ :.3+7+?, /B,/ 8M 3

    8UI/9: 93? N34/ 35 L-9N +?M7-/?9/ 8? +:5 3/.8B;?3L+95 35 :N/ M.8?: 8M :N/ 8UI/9:"

    *-.:N/.L8./^ 3?8:N/. B+MM/./?9/ +5 :N/ A85+:+8? 8M :N/ =N//75 ./73:+4/ :8 :N/ U8B;" H? :N/

    :8A .+,N: L8B/7^ +: 93? U/ 5//? :N3: :N/ U8B; 98LA7/:/7; 984/.5 :N/ :8A N37M 8M :N/ =N//7^

    3778=+?, M8. 3 98?:+?-8-5 3?B M78=+?, 5-.M39/" ON/./35^ +? :N/ 8:N/. :=8 M+,-./5^ :N/

    =N//75 A.8:.-B/ M.8L :N/ 5-.M39/ 8M :N/ U8B; :N-5 93-5+?, 58L/=N3: 8M 3 B+598?:+?-+:;

    :N3: :N./3:/?5 :N/ B/5+./B .3+?B.8A17+F/ 5N3A/"

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    57/128

    57

    ?/:>"- F4 5 ?/"7+ 1Q"-- ,; A-7/:*7

    Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/5/ =/./ 8?7; A./7+L+?3.; B/5+,?5" R?9/ :N/ M.3L/ U/,3? :8 :3F/

    5N3A/ 3 L8./ 98?9./:/ +B/3 =35 M8.L/B U-: 5:+77 +?5-MM+9+/?: :8 L3F/ 3 M+?37 B/5+,?"

    Z/,3.B7/55^ 3 ?/= U8B; 35 5//? +? :N/ ?/W: M+,-./ =35 B/5+,?/B" Q: :N/ :+L/ 8M

    98LA7/:+8?^ :N+5 ?/= B/5+,?/B =35 /WA/9:/B :8 U/ M+?37^ 8. 3: :N/ 4/.; 7/35: 4/.; 9785/ :8

    :N/ M+?37 A.8B-9:" T8=/4/.^ +: +5 +LA/.3:+4/ :8 53; :N3: 8?9/ :N+5 L85: ./9/?: L8B/7 =35

    M+?+5N/B^ 3?B & B+MM/./?: 8A:+8?5 =/./ 343+73U7/ :8 :/5:^ :N/ B/9+5+8? =35 L3B/ :8 348+B

    .-??+?, 5+L-73:+8?5 M8. B.3, 98/MM+9+/?:5" Q7:N8-,N -?8.:N8B8W^ :N/ :/3L U/7+/4/B :N3: +:

    =8-7B U/ U/::/. :8 =3+: -?:+7 3 M+?37 M.3L/ 3?B 3? +?98.A8.3:/B 5://.+?, 5;5:/L =+:N :N/

    =N//7 =/./ B/5+,?/B +? 8.B/. :8 U/,+? 5+L-73:+8?5" Q: :N/ :+L/^ +: 5//L/B -?+?:-+:+4/ :8

    .-? 5+L-73:+8?5 8? B+MM/./?: U8B+/5 :N3: A8:/?:+377; =8-7B U/ +LA855+U7/ :8 +?98.A8.3:/

    =+:N :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 8M :N/ 93." O+:N :N/ 93. 98LA7/:/B^ +: 93? ?8= U/ 53+B :N3: +:

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    58/128

    58

    =35 97/3.7; :N/ .+,N: B/9+5+8?^ 35 ?8?/ 8M :N/ M8-. +?+:+37 B.3M:5 =/./ -5/B" @N+5 =+77 U/

    /WA73+?/B M-.:N/."

    ?/:>"- F9 5 ?#>"+Q )*, !X8-=+-, A-7/:*

    3.

    Proposed Design

    3.1Brakes selection

    One of the most important things to keep in mind when defining the brakes of the

    car was the overall usage of the same. During a fuel-efficient race, since the cars run at

    very low speed, there are only two times when the brakes are mainly used. First, hours

    before the race where you need to pass the inspection, which in the case of Shell Eco

    Marathon is to make sure the system will support your car on a 20 degree slope, and

    second, to keep your car stopped before the begin of a trial. Other than that, the brakes

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    59/128

    59

    are rarely used and therefore must be as weight and cost efficient as possible. As

    mentioned above, the back tire comes with a drum breaking system already mounted,

    which for convenience and cost purposes, did not have to be touched. For the two front

    wheels, since we were using a model inspired in a tricycle, our team was able to

    incorporate two low cost efficient disk braking systems alongside with the wheels

    provided by the manufacturer, who also provided us with the necessary cables and brake

    levers, in order to connect the system to the drivers hand. A picture very similar to the

    braking system used in the car is shown below:

    ?/:>"- FF 5 &")'/*: 7;7+-(

    3.2 Wheels, Tires, and Hubs:

    There are three wheels to be used in our vehicles design. One of this wheels, the

    rear one, is to be the powered wheel and two other wheels in the front will be used to

    steer the car and will be free rolling.

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    60/128

    60

    The tires should cause the least rolling resistance possible and the Michelin ultra low

    rolling resistance 44-406 tires are the best in its class for this application. Shell has a

    partnership with Michelin to offer these to the participating teams for purchase at $78 per

    tire. Our group was fortunate enough to be able to borrow last years Michelin two front

    tires for our car. Some important characteristics of these tires are vii:

    Rolling resistance: 2 kg/t (kilogram/ton)

    Suitable pressure: 50PSI

    Weight: About 150 grams

    Suitable crochet-type rim reference: 20x1.75

    Section Width: 45 mm

    Overall diameter: 500 mm

    ?/:>"- FH 5 Z/=Q-3/* HH5HDMTaking into account the tires requirements, we solidified our choices for the two

    front wheels. Inspired on a tadpole tricycle, two 20", non-machined rim wheels with

    20mm trike hubs were purchased from PowerOnCycling to go in the front. In order to

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    61/128

    61

    optimize the design, we decided to customize with ceramic bearings, which also

    minimizes dissipationviii. Together with the wheels, the same manufacturer was able to

    provide us the hub mounts that will fit perfectly the diameter of wheel axle, which is

    ideal for our steering system. It is important to remember that the back wheel and the

    back tire have been purchased as package with the engine as explained in its designated

    section.

    ?/:>"- FI 5 RQ--3

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    62/128

    62

    ?/:>"- FM 5 S>2 Z#>*+

    ,+, (3..846/ (G:3.9

    @N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L B/5+,?/B 3 M/= =//F5 U/M8./ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? =35 +?5A+./B +?

    ./9-LU/?: :.+F/5 3?B ,8 F3.:5" C+?9/ :N/ 399/7/.3:+8? 8M :N/ 93. =35 B8?/ +? 8?/ 8M :N/

    N3?B5^ :N/ 3U5/?9/ 8M A/B375 9N377/?,/B 8-. :/3L :8 9./3:/ 3 5;5:/L :N3: =8-7B :-.? U8:N

    8M :N/ =N//75 =+:N :N/ L8:+8? =+:N 8?/ N3?B 8?7;" @N/ 98?9/A: -5/B 93? U/ 58L/=N3:

    ./73:/B =+:N :N/ A+9:-./ U/78=f

    ?/:>"- FO 5 [#5')"+ 7+--"/*:

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    63/128

    63

    R? :N/ 7/M: 5+B/ 8M :N/ A.8:8:;A/^ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/^ 3? 37-L+?-L :-U/ =35 A-:

    :8,/:N/. A/.A/?B+9-73.7; :8 3 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/ \53L/ 8?/ -5/B +? :N/ M.3L/] -5+?, 93.U8?

    M+U/. :8= 3?B /A8W;" R? :N/ 8:N/. 5+B/ 8M :N3: :-U/^ 3 L/:37 5:.+A =35 =/7B/B :8 3?8:N/.

    5+B/ 8M :N/ 37-L+?-L :-U/ +? 8.B/. :8 U/ 98??/9:/B :8 8?/ 8M :N/ :+/ .8B5" @N/ A+9:-./

    U/78= 93? U/ -5/B 35 3? +77-5:.3:+8? 8M :N/ 5;5:/L"

    ?/:>"- FP 5 G+--"/*: =#**-=+/#*7

    @N+5 :+/ .8B^ =N+9N +5 3AA.8W+L3:/7; & +?9N/5 78?,^ =35 98??/9:/B :8 3 U87: 8? +:5

    8:N/. /?B" @N+5 U87: ,8/5 :N.8-,N 3?8:N/. L/:37 A73:/^ =N+9N +:5/7M =35 =/7B/B +?:8 :N/

    N-U" @N+5 8MM5/: M.8L :N/ N-U5 +5 ./5A8?5+U7/ M8. :N/ Q9F/.L3?? :-.?+?, 8? :N/ 4/N+97/"

    @N+5 U87:^ =N+9N 93? U/ 5//? 3U84/ 3758 ,8/5 :N.8-,N 3 $& +?9N/5 :.+LL3U7/ :-U-73. :+/

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    64/128

    64

    .8B^ =N+9N 98??/9:5 U8:N N-U5 :N/./M8./^ ,+4+?, :N/ :-.?+?, L8:+8? 8M :N/ 93. =+:N 8?/

    L84/L/?:"

    @N/ =3; :N+5 5;5:/L 98??/9:5 :8 :N/ M.3L/ +5 4/.; 5+L+73. :8 :N/ :/9N?+`-/ -5/B :8

    98?5:.-9: :N/ U8B;" Q 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/^ 7/?,:N 8M 3AA.8W+L3:/7; $( +?9N/5 =35 7+?F/B :8

    37-L+?-L ()(# K1K73LA5 \L8./ B/:3+75 8? :N/ L3?-M39:-.+?, 5/9:+8? 8M :N/ ./A8.:]"

    @N/5/ K1K73LA5 3./ :N/? 98??/9:/B :8 :N/ N-U5 :N.8-,N :N/ F+?, A+? 5N8=? +? :N/ N-U

    L8-?:"

    ?/:>"- F@ 5 R-3,-, Q>27

    T8=/4/.^ 3M:/. ,/::+?, :8 T8-5:8?^ 8? :N/ M+.5: ?+,N: 8M :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ 8-. ,.8-A

    L8-?:/B :N/ :8A A3.: 8M :N/ U8B; :8 :N/ U8::8L^ 7/34+?, 7+::7/ .88L M8. :N/ 5://.+?,

    98?:.87^ =N+9N N3B U//? B/5+,?/B M8. 3 U8B; :N3: =8-7B N34/ 5:3;/B 8? :N/ 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/

    =N//75" *39+?, :N+5 3B4/.5+:;^ =/ N3B :8 +LA.84+5/" 2-.+?, :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ =/ 93L/ -A

    =+:N 3 5+LA7/ A-77/; 5;5:/L^ =N+9N =8-7B .8:3:/ U8:N =N//75 =+:N 3 M8.=3.B 3?B

    U39F=3.B5 L8:+8? \.3:N/. :N3? 7/M: 3?B .+,N: =N+9N =35 7+L+:/B B-/ :8 :N/ U8B; 5N3A/]"

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    65/128

    65

    QM:/. .-5N+?, :8 N8L/ B/A8: 3?B U-;+?, :N/ A3.:5^ 3 5;5:/L =+:N M8-. A-77/;5 3?B 3 =+./

    =35 U-+7:" Q5 =/ N3B /WA/9:/B^ :N/ ?/= 5;5:/L =8.F/B M3?:35:+9377; B-.+?, :N/ =//F/?B"

    ?/:>"- HDE>33-;

    ,+= I5JG

    Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/ B/5+,? 8M :N/ M.3L/ =35 4/.; 98LA7+93:/B 3?B M-77 8M :.+37 3?B

    /..8." @N/ :./L/?B8-5 3L8-?: 8M 9N3?,/5 :8 :N/ M.3L/ L3B/ +: 58 :N3: :N/ /WA/9:/B

    B/5+,? M8. :N/ U8B; U/93L/ ./?B/./B -?B/5+.3U7/" S8./ 5A/9+M+9377;^ :N/ 8.+,+?37

    +?:/?:+8? 8M N34+?, :N/ =N//75 +?5+B/ 8M :N/ 93. U/93L/ -?7+F/7; 35 9379-73:+8?5 ./4/37/B

    :N3: N34+?, :N/ =N//75 8? :N/ +?5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B; =8-7B 7/3B :8 :N/ 5://.+?, M8.9+?, :N/

    U8B; :8 U/ 84/. %% +?9N/5 =+B/" Q7:N8-,N 935:8. 3?,7/5 =/./ 3BB/B +? 3? /MM8.: :8 ./B-9/

    :N/ 8-:/. B/M7/9:+8? 8M :N/ =N//7 35 +: :-.?/B^ +: A.84/B :N3: 37:N8-,N :N/ /MM8.:5 B+B L3F/

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    66/128

    66

    :N/ B/M7/9:+8? 7/55/.^ +: =35 ?8: 5-MM+9+/?: :8 3778= :N/ U8B; :8 U/ 7/55 :N3: %) +?9N/5 =+B/"

    E/93-5/ 8M :N+5^ :N/ :/3L M/7: 4/.; 8U7+,3:/B :8 L3F/ 3 735: L+?-:/ 9N3?,/ :8 :N/ 93. 3?B

    N34/ :N/ =N//75 8? :N/ 8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B;" @N+5 =35 3 N-,/ B/9+5+8?^ 3?B 8?/ :N3: =35

    L3B/ =+:N ?8: L-9N :+L/ :8 5A3./" E; :N/ :+L/ :N/ B/9+5+8? :8 7/34/ :N/ =N//75 8-:5+B/ 8M

    :N/ U8B; =35 L3B/^ :N/./ =35 I-5: -?B/. 3 L8?:N -?:+7 :N/ :/3L N35 :8 5N+A :N/+. 93."

    O+:N+? :N+5 8?/1L8?:N :+L/ M.3L/^ 3? /?:+./7; ?/= U8B; N3B :8 U/ B/5+,?/B 3?B

    L3?-M39:-./B"

    H: 93??8: U/ 84/.5:3:/B N8= 9N377/?,+?, :N+5 =35 U/93-5/ 8M :N/ :+L/ 98?5:.+9:+8?5" @N+5

    =35 M-.:N/. 9N377/?,+?, :N3?F5 :8 :N/ 8U5:397/5 :N3: N3B :8 U/ 84/.98L/^ ?3L/7;

    98?M8.L+?, :8 :N/ 8:N/. 98LA8?/?:5 8M :N/ 93." Q7:N8-,N N34+?, :N/ =N//75 8? :N/

    8-:5+B/ 8M :N/ U8B; B+B ?8: /?:3+7 L3?; 9N3?,/5 :8=3.B5 :N/ ./3. 8M :N/ 93.^ +: L/3?: 3

    5-U5:3?:+37 3L8-?: 8M 9N377/?,/5 3?B 9N3?,/5 :8=3.B5 :N/ M.8?: 8M :N/ 93." S8./

    5A/9+M+9377;^ :N/ ?/= U8B; N3B :8 U/ B/5+,?/B 58 :N3: +: =8-7B ?8: 9877+B/ =+:N :N/ =N//75

    B-.+?, 5://.+?,^ ;/: U/ U+, /?8-,N :8 M+: :N/ =+B/ .877 U3. 3?B N34/ /W:.3 5A39/ :8 A739/

    :N/ 5://.+?, 3?B 399/7/.3:+?, 5;5:/L5 M8. :N/ 93." @N/ 8U5:397/ N/./ 7+/5 +? L3F+?, :N/ 93.

    U/ 5N3A/B 7+F/ 3 .3+?B.8A^ 35 =35 B/5+./B U; :N/ B/5+,?/." T34+?, :N/ 93. U/ 5N3A/B 7+F/ 3

    .3+?B.8A =35 B+MM+9-7: 35 :N/ :-.?+?, =N//75 M8.9/B :N/ 93. :8 U/ :N+??/. 8? :N/ M.8?:^

    =N+7/ :N/ .877 U3.^ U/+?, :N/ =+B/5: A3.: 8M :N/ 93.^ M8.9/B +: :8 U/ 3: +:5 =+B/5: =/77 U/N+?B

    :N/ L+BB7/ 8M :N/ U8B;" *-.:N/.L8./^ :N/ /?,+?/ =35 ?8: 37+,?/B =+:N :N/ 9/?:/. 8M :N/

    93.^ L/3?+?, :N3: +: M-.:N/. M8.9/B :8 93. :8 U/ ./73:+4/7; =+B/. ?/3. :N/ ./3. /?B"

    *8.:-?3:/7;^ 3M:/. L-9N =8.F 3 B/5+,? =35 98LA7/:/B :N3: =35 -53U7/" Q7:N8-,N :N/

    .3+?B.8A 5N3A/ =35 ?8: 8U:3+?/B^ :N/ :/3L =35 53:+5M+/B =+:N :N/ ./5-7:+?, B/5+,?" Q :N.//

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    67/128

    67

    B+L/?5+8?37 L8B/7 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ M+,-./ U/78="

    ?/:>"- H4 5 ?/*)3 A-7/:*

    V+4/? :N3: :N+5 L8B/7 :88F 57+,N:7; 84/. $ =//F5 :8 B/5+,? B-/ :8 +:5 98LA7/W+:; 3?B

    98?5+5:/?: 9N3?,/5 :8 98?M8.L :8 :N/ M.3L/ 3?B 5://.+?,^ 7/55 :N3? $ =//F5 =/./ 7/M: -?:+7

    :N/ 93. =35 5N+AA/B" Q5 5:3:/B U/M8./^ :N+5 L/3?: :N3: :N/ :/3L -?M8.:-?3:/7;^ B+B ?8: N34/

    :N/ :+L/ :8 .-? :N/ 5+L-73:+8?5 :8 8A:+L+a/ :N+5 5N3A/ 35 :N/; 8.+,+?377; +?:/?B/B" @N/

    5+L-73:+8?5 =/./ 5F+AA/B^ 3?B :N/ A.89/55 8M L3?-M39:-.+?, U/,3?"

    ,+K L4621 %.:4/6

    ?/:>"- H9 5 N)" ?/*)3 4

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    68/128

    68

    4 Project Management

    4.1 Overview

    Q5 3 :/3L =8.F+?, :8,/:N/. M8. :N/ U/5: 8-:98L/ +? :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ :N/ :/3L

    /?4+5+8?5 :8 A-: +? :N/ 53L/ 3L8-?: 8M =8.F +? :N/ A.8I/9:" Q77 L/LU/.5 3./ M-77; 3=3./

    8M 377 L//:+?,5^ /WA/9:3:+8?5^ 8UI/9:+4/5 3?B :35F5 :N3: L-5: U/ L/: +? 8.B/. :8 L3F/ :N+5

    I8-.?/; 3 5-99/55M-7 8?/ 3?B N34/ 377 98LL+::/B +? A-::+?, /`-37 :+L/ 3?B /MM8.: +?:8

    B8+?, 58"

    4.2 Breakdown of Work into Specific Tasks

    b3:-.377; U-+7B+?, 3 93. A.8:8:;A/ =+77 +?4874/ A-::+?, 5/4/.37 A+/9/5 8M 3 A-aa7/

    :8,/:N/. 5-99/55M-77; +? 8.B/. M8. :N/ M+?37 A.8B-9: :8 M-?9:+8? +B/377;" @N/ A.8:8:;A/ 93?

    U/ B+4+B/B +? 5/4/.37 B+MM/./?: 5L377 5/9:+8?5 5-9N 35 >?,+?/ C/7/9:+8?^ E8B; 2/5+,?^

    S3:/.+37 C/7/9:+8?^ KN355+5 \*.3L/]^ C://.+?, C;5:/L^ E.3F+?, 5;5:/L^ ON//7 3?B Z+L

    5/7/9:+8?" C+?9/ :N/ A.8I/9: B/5+,? +?4874/5 A3.:+9+A3:+8? +? 3 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: +5 3758 4/.;

    +LA8.:3?: :8 355+,? L/LU/.5 :35F5 :N3: =+77 355-./ :N/ :/3L +5 98LA7;+?, =+:N :N/

    ./,-73:+8?5 3?B B/3B7+?/5 +LA85/B U; :N/ 8.,3?+a/.5"

    4.3 Project Timeline

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    69/128

    69

    ?/:>"- HF 5 E"#K-=+ 1/(-3/*-

    4.4 Breakdown of Responsibilities

    *8. :N/ $)#% >98 CN/77 S3.3:N8? :/3L^ :N/ :35F5 N34/ U//? B+5:.+U-:/B 35 M8778=5f

    S3.98 E/:3?98-.:f >?,+?/ ./5/3.9N 3?B 5/7/9:+8?^ *-/7 5/7/9:+8? 3?B B/7+4/.;

    5;5:/L 3?B @.3?5L+55+8? 5;5:/L"

    E.;3?B Q985:3f Q/.8B;?3L+9 ./5/3.9N^ U8B; B/5+,?^ L3:/.+37 5/7/9:+8? 3?B M.3L/

    B/5+,?"

    */.?3?B8

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    70/128

    70

    \:N.// N-?B./B 3?B M8.:;] N8-.5" *8. :N/ 5/98?B A3.: 8M :N/ A.8I/9: C/?+8. 2/5+,? HH^

    98-?:7/55 N8-.5 =/./ 5A/?: +? :N+5 93." C:3.:+?, +? :N/ 735: =//F 8M X3?-3.;^ =N/? :N/ M+.5:

    A3.:5 5:3.:/B :8 3..+4/^ :N/ ,.8-A L/: 98?5+5:/?:7; % 8. & :+L/5 3 =//F M8. 5/4/.37 N8-.5^

    58L/:+L/5 /4/? #( N8-.5 3 B3;" Q5 :N/ 98LA/:+:+8? 5:3.:/B :8 3AA.839N^ :N/ =8.F 783B

    8?7; +?9./35/B" 2-.+?, CA.+?, E./3F M8. /W3LA7/^ :N/ ,.8-A L/: M8. #$ N8-.5 8. L8./ M8.

    3: 7/35: ' :+L/5" H? :N/ 735: :=8 =//F5 U/M8./ :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: +5 ?8: 3? /W3,,/.3:+8? :8

    53; :N3: D$ N8-.5 =/./ 5A/?: 98?5/9-:+4/7; 3L8?, :N/ % 8M -5 +? :N+5 93."

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    71/128

    71

    5. Engineering Design and Analysis

    5.1 Estimated Cost Analysis

    *HY >98 CN/77 $)#% ,.8-A +5 9-../?:7; 3: :N/ 5:3,/ 8M A-.9N35+?, L85: 8M :N/ A3.:5 :N3:

    =+77 U/ L3?-M39:-./B :8 :N/ 93." E/78=^ 3 U./3FB8=? 8M :N/ /WA/9:/B /WA/?5/5 U/M8./ =/

    5:3.:/B :N+5 A.8I/9: 35 =/77 35 3 L8./ B/:3+7/B :3U7/ 8M :N/ /WA/?5/5 =/ N34/ N3B 58 M3. 3./

    5N8=?f

    1)23- H 5 !X8-=+-, !X8-*7-7

    !"#$%&$' !"#$)*$*

    +,&-. /0-**1* !"#$)*$* "#$$%$$+,&-. 2,'3 40$.. !"#$)*$* "&'(&$%$$

    +,&-. !)51)$ !"#$)*$* "($$%$$

    +,&-. 26-7$ 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "))$%$$

    +,&-. 4&$$61)5 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "*&+%$$

    +,&-. +6-9$. !"#$)*$* "*'($$%$$

    +,&-. :,)$3 ;

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    72/128

    72

    5.2 Actual Cost Analysis

    1)23- I 5 N>""-*+ !X8-*7-7

    >%&

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    73/128

    73

    QDI:812 O:R1 "&%++ & "&%++

    QDI:812 />R3 "&-%++ & "&-%++

    O0>6 ".-%+) & ".-%+)

    G:2234S "-+%+) & "-+%+)

    V:5MN: =3234 ".*+%$$ & ".*+%$$Q534E3;HSCL>2HI "*%++ & "-%.*

    J>43 T:4;311 "+$%$$ & "+$%$$

    +,&-. !)51)$ !"#$)*$* "&'.*,%)+

    26-7$ 43*&$8

    G4:1H1 "*$%$$ . "($%$$

    V3@34 \R:>4] "&,%++ & "&,%++

    T3>N:;:8 9>43 "+(%&- & "+(%&-

    ()BB O:M631 "&%&$ . ".%.$

    .$BB JI3361 "++%.$ . "&+#%-$

    O34:5>H M3:4>;E1 "($%$$ . "&.$%$$

    +,&-. 26-7$ 43*&$8 !"#$)*$* "-+-%,*

    4&$$61)5 43*&$8

    T8M =08;2 "*,%)$ . ",)%$$

    C5:66 2>3 40N ".)%++ & ".)%++G>E 2>3 P0N "&,%++ & "&,%++

    [6 M60H63 CI>RR>;E "&'-*$%$$ & "&'-*$%$$

    +,&-. +6-9$. !"#$)*$* "*'(,(%)$

    401##1)5 !"#$)*$*

    =:4H0 ").%)* & ").%)*

    734;:;N0 "-.%,. & "-.%,.

    G4S:;N "-$%,( & "-$%,(

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    74/128

    74

    +,&-. 401##1)5 !"#$)*$* "&*(%$&

    >%,88,'-&1,)

    T0236 ",(&%*$ & ",(&%*$

    >%,88,'-&1,) +,&-. ",(&%*$

    =&0$6 $"#$)*$*

    =:4H0 J36N>;E'VQA1'TA'P:N>0CI:H< "&+&%-$

    734;:;N0 J:6E433;1'TA "(-%,$

    G4S:;N J:6E433;1' TA "()%*$

    902:6 ^2I34 QDR3;131 "*.&%-$

    +=+>? !@A!B4!4 ")'+-*%(*

    +=+>? !@!:A+ "*'(,(%)$

    +=+>? /=4+ ")'+-*%(* * "&'+#&%.&

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    75/128

    75

    6. Manufacturing

    M+* (3..846/ (G:3.9

    @N/ L3?-M39:-.+?, A.89/55 8M :N/ 5://.+?, 5;5:/L +?4874/B 5/4/.37 5L377 5:/A5" @N/

    M+.5: 8?/ =35 :8 9./3:/ K1K73LA5 :8 U/ 3::39N/B :8 :N/ N-U" H? 8.B/. :8 9./3:/ :N85/^ :=8

    U789F5 8M 37-L+?-L =/./ 8.B/. =+:N #"' W #"' +?9N/5 5+B/ 3?B % +?9N/5 7/?,:N" O+:N :N85/

    U789F5^ =/ =/./ 93U3U7/ 8M -5+?, 3 L+77 :8 9-: 8MM 3 5L377 ./9:3?,7/ M.8L :N/ +?5+B/^

    :N/./M8./ ./5-7:+?, +? :N/ K 5N3A/ ?//B/B"

    ?/:>"- HH 5 N5N3)(87 (/33/*:

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    76/128

    76

    QM:/. 8U:3+?+?, :N/ /WA/9:/B ./5-7:5^ =/ 5:+77 N3B A.8U7/L5 B-/ :8 :N/ M39: :N3: :N/

    :-.?+?, =35 7+L+:/B U; :N/ 5N3.A 3?,7/5 8M :N+5 5-AA8.:" H? 8.B/. :8 5874/ :N+5^ 3 ,.+?B/.

    =35 -5/B :8 9./3:/ M+77/:5 +? 377 5+B/5 8M :N+5 A+/9/^ 9./3:+?, 3 5/L+9+.9-73. 5N3A/ 8? U8:N

    5+B/5" R?9/ :N/ K1K73LA5 =N/./ ./3B;^ :N/./ =/./ =/7B/B :8 3? 37-L+?-L A+A/ =+:N "G)&

    8-:5+B/ B+3L/:/.^ I-5: U+, /?8-,N :8 U/ M+::/B +?:8 :N/ 93.U8? M+U/. :-U/5 :N3: =/./

    3::39N/B :8 :N/ M.3L/" @N+5 :/9N?+`-/ =35 -5+?, U/93-5/ =/ 98-7B ?8: =/7B 93.U8? M+U/.

    :8 :N/ K1K73LA 3?B =/ =3?:/B :8 534/ 58L/ =/+,N: U; ?8: -5+?, 3 78?, 37-L+?-L .8B" H?

    8.B/. :8 L3F/ 5-./ :N/ 37-L+?-L =8-7B 5:+9F :8 :N/ 93.U8? M+U/.^ /A8W; =35 -5/B"

    ?/:>"- HI 5 N5=3)(87

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    77/128

    77

    ?/:>"- HM 5 TX3- =#**-=+/#*

    M+; I82N46/ (G:3.9

    CL377 L3?-M39:-.+?, =35 B8?/ +? 8.B/. :8 39N+/4/ :N/ B/5+./B U.3F+?, 8-:98L/"

    H? 8.B/. :8 ./5A/9: :N/ .-7/5 8M :N/ 98LA/:+:+8?^ +: =35 ./`-+./B :8 -5/ U8:N U.3F/5 +? :N/

    M.8?: =+:N 8?/ L/9N3?+5L" @N/ 587-:+8? :8 :N3: =35 =/7B+?, :=8 U.3F+?, 7/4/.5 :8,/:N/.^

    :N/./M8./ A./55+?, U8:N =+:N 8?/ L8:+8?"

    M+, L829.

    @N/ A.89/55 8M L3?-M39:-.+?, U/,3? =+:N :N/ A./4+8-57; L/?:+8?/B A3:/?: U; J8:7+?5F+"

    Q5 L/?:+8?/B U/M8./^ :N/ A.89/55 /?:3+7/B -5+?, 93.U8? M+U/. :8= 35 3 L/3?5 :8 9./3:/ -1

    I8+?:5 3?B 3::39N :N/L :8 :N/ 37./3B; A-.9N35/B 93.U8? M+U/. :-U+?," @N/ A.89/55 93? U/

    U/5: B/A+9:/B +? :N/ ?/W: M+,-./^ 98-.:/5; 8M :N/ +?4/?:8.^ J8:7+?F5+f

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    78/128

    78

    ?/:>"- HO 5 Z-+Q#, \. T,K#/*/*: +>2-7

    @N/ M8778=+?, :N.// M+,-./5 B/A+9: 58L/ ./37 7+M/ 3AA7+93:+8?5 35 5N8=? U; J8:7+?5F+" @N/

    M+.5: 8M :N/ :N.// B/A+9:5 N8= :N/ I8+?:5 3./ .+,N: 3M:/. U/+?, :+/B :8,/:N/.^ =N+7/ :N/

    5/98?B 3?B :N+.B 5N8= 3 M+?+5N/B A.8B-9: 3?B :N/ A.8B-9: +? -5/^ ./5A/9:+4/7;"

    ?/:>"- HP 5 Y-7>3+] !X)(83- 4

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    79/128

    79

    ?/:>"- H@ Y-7>3+] !X)(83- 9

    ?/:>"- ID Y-7>3+] !X)(83- F

    Q5 93? U/ 5//? +? :N/ A./4+8-5 M+,-./5^ :N+5 L/:N8B 3778=5 M8. L-7:+A7/ :-U/5 :8 98??/9: 3:

    3 5+?,7/ 4/.:/W^ 8. 9./3:/ 3 98??/9:+8? A8+?: 378?, 3 :-U/" H: +5 L3+?7; U/93-5/ 8M :N/5/

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    80/128

    80

    ./358?5^ :N/ 3MM8.B3U+7+:; 8M :N+5 L/:N8B^ 3?B :N/ 3U+7+:; :8 98??/9: L3?; :-U/5 3: 3?;

    3?,7/ :N3: :N/ :/3L +LL/B+3:/7; B/9+B/B :8 3AA7; :N+5 L/:N8B"

    Q7:N8-,N :N+5 L/:N8B +5 +??843:+4/ 3?B N/?9/ ?8: L-9N +?M8.L3:+8? 8? +: +5 343+73U7/^ :N/

    :/3L A.89//B/B :8 -5/ +:" E-: :N+5 739F 8M U39F,.8-?B F?8=7/B,/ L3B/ M8. L-9N .88L

    M8. /..8." @N/ 5:/A5 =N/./ M8778=/B 35 9785/7; 35 A855+U7/ M8778=+?, :N/ B/59.+A:+8?

    A.84+B/B +? :N/ A3:/?:" Q5 3 5:3.:+?, A8+?:^ :N/ :/3L 9./3:/B :N/ L39N+?/ 5-,,/5:/B U; :N/

    +?4/?:8. :8 =.3A :N/ L3?B./75 =+:N :N/ :8=" @N/ L39N+?/^ 35 U/78=98?5+5:5 8M 3 .877 8M

    :8= U/+?, N/7B +? A739/^ =N+7/ 5:.+?, +5 A-77/B :N.8-,N 58L/ N88F5 :N3: 5/.4/ :8 9./3:/

    :/?5+8?" Q5 :N/ :8= +5 U/+?, =.3AA/B 3.8-?B :N/ 5A+??+?, 98LA8?/?: :N3: N87B5 :N/

    L3?B./75 :8 :N/ .+,N:^ +: +5 3758 A355+?, :N.8-,N 3 5L377 98?:3+?/. :N3: N8-5/5 3 L+W:-./ 8M

    /A8W; ./5+? L+W:-./" @N/ A.89//B+?, M+,-./ +5 :N/ 39:-37 L39N+?/ U/+?, -5/B 3M:/. +: =35

    M+?+5N/B"

    ?/:>"- I4 R/*,/*: Z)=Q/*-

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    81/128

    81

    ?/:>"- I9 R/*,/*: Z)=Q/*-

    H: 5N8-7B U/ 5:3:/B :N3: 37:N8-,N :N+5 L39N+?/ =35 4/.; N/7AM-7 +? :N/ A.8B-9:+8? 8M :N/ -

    I8+?:5^ 5/4/.37 98LA7+93:+8?5 =/./ L/: :N.8-,N8-: :N/ =3;" *+.5:^ 35 93.U8? M+U/. :8= N35

    3 ./73:+4/7; 73.,/ L8B-7-5 M8. :/?5+8? U-: 4/.; 78= M8. 98LA./55+8? 3?B 5N/3.^ :N/ :8=

    =35 A.8?/ :8 9-::+?, /35+7;" @N3: +5^ :N/ M.+9:+8? 3,3+?5: :N/ L/:377+9 N88F5 -5/B =35 L8./

    :N3? /?8-,N :8 93-5/ :N/ :8= :8 U./3F 8? 5/4/.37 89935+8?5" Q758^ +: A.84/B :8 U/ `-+:/

    :N/ 9N377/?,/ :8 N34/ :N/ 3M8./L/?:+8?/B 98?:3+?/. N8-5/ :N/ ./5+? L+W:-./ 3?B N34/ :N/

    :8= A355 :N.8-,N =+:N8-: 93-5+?, :N/ ./5+? :8 /593A/ :N.8-,N :N/ /W+: N87/ 8M :N/ :8="

    S8./84/.^ :N/ 5A+??+?, A3.: 8? :N/ .+,N: ./`-+./B :N3: :N/ :8= U/+?, =.3AA/B U/

    98?5:3?:7; ,-+B/B +? 8.B/. :8 B+5:.+U-:/ :N/ :8= /4/?7; 378?, :N/ L3?B./7" R.+,+?377; :N/

    :/3L +?:/?B/B :8 A-: 3 5L377 L8:8. 8? :N+5 L84+?, A3.: U-: U/93-5/ 58 L-9N /W:/.?37

    ,-+B3?9/ =35 ?//B/B M8. :N/ :8=^ +: A.84/B :8 U/ L-9N /35+/. :8 348+B :N/ L8:8. 3?B B8

    :N/ 5A+??+?, L3?-377;" Q7:N8-,N :+L/ 98?5-L+?,^ :N+5 ./5-7:+?, - I8+?:5 =/./ 8M

    399/A:3U7/ `-37+:;" @N/ M8778=+?, M+,-./ 5N8=5 :N/ ./5-7:+?, - I8+?:" @N/ A+9:-./ 5N8=5

    8?7; 8?/ -1I8+?:^ U-: L8./ :N3? %) =/./ A.8B-9/B" Q758 +LA8.:3?: :8 ?8:+9/^ :N/ 788A N35

  • 7/25/2019 FIU Design Report - 2012(1)

    82/128

    82

    3 9+.9-73. 5N3A/" @N+5 +5 B8?/ A-.A85/7; 58 :