fiscal year 21 · 2020. 2. 18. · 4.0%. 6.0%. 8.0%. 10.0%. 12.0%. 14.0%. 16.0%. 2007. 2008. 2009....
TRANSCRIPT
-
Fiscal Year 21Department Budget
Employee Total CompensationBureau of Human Resources
February 18, 2020
-
BHR Partners to Achieve Other’s Goals
• Organization Effectiveness
• Total Rewards
• Compliance
D.SeeleyCommissioner
T. SteckelDir. Benefits
E.ZellerDir. HR Centers of
Excellence
OPENDir. Human Resources
M.Deyo-AmendeCood. Special
Projects
M.BarnettLegal Counsel
2
-
No Budget Change is Recommended
3
93%
92%
91.4%
91.6%
91.8%
92.0%
92.2%
92.4%
92.6%
60
65
70
75
FY 2018 FY 2019
FTE Utilization
Budgeted FTE Utilized FTE
2.8%
15.5%
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0%
Turnover
BHR Turnover
FY 2019 FY 2018
18.1%
31.9%
44.4%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Jan 2020 5 Years 10 Years
BHR Retirement Eligibility$295,389
$7,121,983
BHR Funding
General Funds Federal Funds Other Funds
-
4
Executive Branch Employees
-
1/3 of Employees Have 15 or More Years of Service
6%
24%
22%
22%
23%
3%
Age
18 - 24
25 - 34
35 - 44
45 - 54
55 - 64
65 +
23%
21%
23%
25%
8%
Years of Service
< 3
3 - 6
7 - 14
15 - 29
30 +
5
-
13.5%
12.4%
10.5% 10.8%
12.2%
14.4%13.5% 13.3% 13.5%
13.9%
12.0%
14.6% 14.3%
2.8% 2.7%
4.2%5.0% 4.9%
4.4% 4.1%3.6% 3.3% 3.0% 3.2%
3.4%2.8%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Statewide Turnover Unemployment
Turnover Rises As Unemployment Drops
6
-
Pay Reported as Second Highest Reason for Leaving
Reason for Exit Percent Responding Primary Reason
Retirement, Family Obligations, etc. 37%
Pay 17%
Job Location 7%
Lack of Advancement Opportunities 6%
Work Environment 5% 382
157
72
FY19 Internal Movement
Promotions
Transfers
Demotions
8.4% of employees
changed jobs within state
7
-
State Faces Significant Retirement Risk
14.4%
27.9%
41.0%
DENR, 22.60%
BOA, 39.90%
BOA, 58.90%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
Today Five Years Ten Years
As of Jan 1, 2020
Statewide Highest
8
-
9
Compensation
-
10
Governor’s Budget Recommends No Increase
Governor Noem has recommended no salary policy increase for FY21 based upon revenue projections.
-
Recruitment and
Retention
Culture of State
Government
Work Environment
Type of WorkPersonal and Professional
Development
Career Advancement
Compensation and Benefits
Many Factors Impact Attraction and Retention
11
-
Market Analysis and Pay Ranges Best Comparison
Market Minimum Market Value Maximum
80 - 90% of market value
50th Percentile of market data
110 - 125% of market value
Illustration of a pay range
ArtificialMinimum
Currently69 - 78%
of market value
12
-
92 95
855
1,508
1,610 1,590
830
493
123
17 14 4 1 10
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
Position In Range
2.2%35.3% 62.5%
97.8% of State Employees Paid Below Market
13
-
666 People in SDSEHP and Medicaid in FY19
73
438
123
543
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Adults Children
Medicaid Recipients in SDSEHP
Dec-19 FYI 2019
14
-
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
Single Parent OneChild
Pregnant Motherwith One Child
Family of four
Medicaid Income Threshold
Income Threshold
0500
1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,5005,000
Single Parent One Child Pregnant Mother withOne Child*
Family of four
Count of Employees below Medicaid Threshold
Count of Employees below Threshold
*female employees only
15
-
16
Benefits
-
Fully Employee Paid• Dental Insurance (8,920)• Vision Insurance (8,379)• Accident Insurance (5,392)• Hospital Indemnity Insurance (3,699)• Short-Term Disability (4,836)• Supplemental Life Insurance (5,626)• Dependent Life Insurance (2,902)
17
Employer and Employee Share Benefits Package Cost
Account Base Plans Available• Flexible Spending Accounts (1,097)• Health Reimbursement Arrangements (1,945)• Health Savings Accounts (9,236)
Fully Employer Paid• Life Insurance ($25,000)• Fee for Account Based Plans• Health Plan Opt Out Payment• HSA Seed Money• Vacation, Sick, Holidays
Employer and Employee Paid• Health Insurance
-
Health Plan27,000 lives
Auditors
CVS/Caremark
Segal Group
BHR & Governor’s
Office
Health Management
PartnersDAKOTACARE
Staywell
Dialog Direct
KEPRO
18
Managing SDSEHP Requires Complex Partnership
-
Self-funded Plan• Avoids insurers built-in profit margin • Allows for greater flexibility in plan design• Employer assumes the risk
Direct Contracts• Lower inflation risk• Recognizes geographically dispersed employee base• Requires higher levels of administrative effort
19
SDSEHP Designed to Save Money and Control Costs
-
Total covered employees, pre-65 retirees, spouses, dependents, and COBRA participants on January 1, 2020*
*As of January 1, 2020, there were 425 opt outs.
12,781
4,272
9,814
26,867
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
Employees Spouses Dependents TotalMembers
20
Coverage by Type
Covered Employee and Dependent Count Nearly Equal
70%30%
Health Plan Enrollment
High Plan Low Plan
-
53
13
435
499
67 37
31
50
29
501
19 147
86 64
127
86
16547
89 41
3,026
103
735
2674,354
57
47
93
382538
16
38
49
111
29
15 26
52921,422
126
6
794
2,166
243
245 25
205
16
58
0
42
309
29
141
37
66
90
2,840
982
90
Chart includes covered employees, pre-65 retirees, spouses, dependents, and COBRA participants; there are 673 members of the health plan who live outside South Dakota. 21
Dispersed Workforce Complicates and Raises Costs
-
22
$0.M
$5.M
$10.M
$15.M
$20.M
$25.M
$30.M
$35.M
$40.M
$45.M
$0-$499.99 $500-$4.9K $5K-$19.9K $20K-$49.9K $50K-$99.9K $100K-$999.9K $1M-$1.99M $2M or >
14,093 8045 2,472 631 289 199 < 5 < 5
Empl
oyer
Cos
tM
illio
ns
Number of Members w/Claims within Employer Cost Range
Health Plan Cost Distribution
The Plan Spent $718 Per to Cover 86% of Members
-
Less than 1% of Covered Drive 34% of Medical Cost
$30.3
$35.0
$43.3
$82.6
$84.6
$84.4
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
High Cost Claimant Spending by Fiscal Year
HCC ALL OTHERS
In Millions
139
171
206
27,005
27,311
26,985
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
Number of High Cost Claimants by Fiscal Year
HCC Count All Others
23
-
24
Top 5 Diagnosis Categories Account for 68% of HCC Spend
57$11.4M
26$5.4M
24$4.9M
14$4.6M
9$3.2M
Cancer
Diseases of the circulatory system
Diseases of the nervous system andsense organs
Diseases of the musculoskeletal systemand connective tissue
Infectious and parasitic diseases
-
FY19 High Cost Claimant Spending Analysis
25
SDSEHP FY19 Top Contributors to Rx Trend
Overall drug class Net CostContribution to Net
Trend CVS BoB
Analgesics -Anti-inflammatory $6,641,429 3.90% 1.20%
Anti-cancer $3,071,236 2.90% 0.80%
Antidiabetics $4,787,412 2.20% 1.50%
Specialty Drugs Top Contributors to Rx Trend
Oncology $3,552,396 4.10% 0.90%
Rheumatoid Arthritis $6,152,789 3.20% 1.00%
Psoriasis $2,001,535 2.70% 1.30%
-
Specialty Drug Users and Costs Higher than Peers
SDSEHP Key Rx Metrics FY19 FY19 SDSEHP FY19 Peer
Total Prescriptions 225,994
Generic Dispensing Rate (GDR) 87.00% 86.80%
Average Monthly Utilizers as % of Members 31.50% 41.70%
Specialty Utilizers as % of Members 1.20% 0.90%
Specialty % of Total Net Cost 55.10% 45.40%
Specialty % of Total Prescriptions 1.30% 1.00%
% Specialty Member Cost Share 3.40% 2.40%26
-
BoB Rank State Rank Drug Name Specialty Class Total Net Cost
% of Specialty
Cost Total Utilizers Total Rxs Net Cost per Rx
1 1 Humira Rheumatoid Arthritis $4,424,928 24.14% 84 763 $5,799.38
10 2 Copaxone Multiple Sclerosis $1,186,619 6.47% 22 204 $5,816.76
2 3 Enbrel Rheumatoid Arthritis $1,052,924 5.74% 30 227 $4,638.43
3 4 Stelara Psoriasis $1,002,155 5.47% 16 57 $17,581.66
7 5 Gilenya Multiple Sclerosis $965,501 5.27% 12 122 $7,913.95
4 6 Tecfidera Multiple Sclerosis $865,711 4.72% 13 114 $7,593.96
30 7 Rebif Multiple Sclerosis $802,323 4.38% 10 108 $7,428.92
5 8 Revlimid Oncology $547,889 2.99% 4 36 $15,219.13
8 9 Cosentyx Psoriasis $529,432 2.89% 10 73 $7,252.49
236 10 Rydapt Oncology $415,282 2.27% 2 15 $27,685.49
Total $11,792,764 64.34% 203 171927
10 Drugs Account for 64% of Specialty Costs
-
60% 63% 58%
45%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
SD FY17 SD FY18 SD FY19 Staywell Bookof Business
Perc
ent C
ompl
etio
n
28
Wellness Participation Remains Strong
-
29
76%
57%51%
75%
45% 44%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Weight Cholesteral Blood Pressure
At ri
sk (m
oder
ate
& h
igh)
Risk Factor
Past Current
Risk Factors Decrease for Many
-
30
50%44%
6%
54%
41%
5%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Low risk (0-2 risks) Moderate risk (3-5 risks) High risk (6+ risks)
Past Current
Numbers with Multiple Risks Falling
-
FY19 Estimated Cost Avoidance
Avoidable Health Care Cost
Avoidable Indirect Cost
Total Change All Repeat Participants
(N=10,247)Total Change per
Repeat Participant
Total Increase (Decrease) -$1,645,500 -$2,382,400 -$4,028,000 -$393
31
Better Wellbeing Avoids Higher Spending
-
FY19 Plan Changes• Deductible Increases• HDP OOPM Increase• HDP Add Coinsurance for Brand Name Drugs
FY20 Plan Changes• Deductibles Increases• OOPM Increases• Increase Rx Co-pay, Except Generics• LDP Rx Deductible Increase• LDP Rx OOPM Increase
32
Past Plan Changes Focused on User
-
Must complete wellness qualifications to earn any Health Savings Account (HSA) seed money.
33
FY21 Change Focused on Improving Health
-
SDSEHP Deductible Rising Faster than National
$300
$500
$750 $850
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$1,800
$2,000 $2,200
$643 $736
$871
$1,153
$1,188
$1,838
$2,086
$2,349 $2,486
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
SD Low Deductible SD High Deductible Average Deductible* Average High Deductible*
34*National data from the Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits 2019 Annual Survey
-
Sout
h D
akot
a
Sout
h Da
kota
Sout
h Da
kota
Sout
h Da
kota
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
Deductible-Low Indiv Deductible-High Indiv Deductible-Low Family Deductible-High Family
Deductible
South Dakota Public/Private 10K-20K EE Regional Public/Private all sizes Government-all sizes National
35*Segal/Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
Low Deductible Plan Not Aligned With Market
-
36
Sout
h Da
kota
Sout
h Da
kota
Sout
h Da
kota
Sout
h Da
kota
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
OOPM-Low Indiv OOPM-High Indiv OOPM-Low Family OOPM-High Family
Out of Pocket Maximum (OOPM)
South Dakota Public/Private 10K-20K EE Regional Public/Private all sizes Government-all sizes National
*Segal/Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
Out of Pocket Max Higher than Market
-
37
$0
$4,000
$8,000
$12,000
Nebraska Minnesota Iowa South Dakota Wyoming
Low Plan-Individual Coverage*
Employer Contribution Employee Contribution
$0
$4,000
$8,000
$12,000
Nebraska Minnesota South Dakota
High Plan-Individual Coverage*
Employer Contribution Employee Contribution
*Segal Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
SD Contributes More for Individual Coverage
-
38
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
South Dakota Iowa Minnesota Nebraska Wyoming
Low Plan-Family Coverage*Employer Contribution Employee Contribution
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
South Dakota Nebraska Minnesota
High Plan-Family Coverage*
Employer Contribution Employee Contribution
*Segal Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
Family Contribution Lower than Other States
-
39
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
Minnesota Iowa Wyoming Nebraska South Dakota
Low Plan-Individual Coverage*
Employee Contributions Out of Pocket Costs
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota
High Plan-Individual Coverage*
Employee Contributions Out of Pocket Costs
*Segal Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
Employee Costs Highest Among Neighbors
-
40
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
Minnesota Iowa Wyoming Nebraska South Dakota
Low Plan-Family Coverage*
Employee Contributions Out of Pocket Costs
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000
$14,000
Minnesota South Dakota Nebraska
High Plan-Family Coverage*
Employee Contributions Out of Pocket Costs
*Segal Medical/Rx Benefit Benchmarking Report January 2020
Covered Families Pay Much More
-
• Contracting with vendors
• Claims volatility
• Risk mitigation
• Intro of new, very expensive specialty drugs
• Medical inflation more than 2x greater than overall inflation
41
Plan Faces Several Challenges
-
Location Melanoma Rate /
100k
Regional Rank
Oral / Pharyx
Regional Rank
Colon Regional Rank
Prostate Regional Rank
Non-Hodgkins
Lymphoma
Regional Rank
United States 30.1 12.0 40.5 97.1 18.3
Iowa 25.4 7 12.9 3 44.3 3 103.7 6 19.8 3
Minnesota 53.9 1 12.4 4 38.7 5 104.5 5 21.1 1
Montana 53.2 2 11.6 6 38.9 4 112.2 2 17.7 4
Nebraska 40.4 5 12.0 5 44.3 3 108.7 4 17.6 5
North Dakota 31.8 6 13.1 2 45.1 1 114.8 1 16.2 7
South Dakota 44.1 3 13.3 1 44.4 2 111.9 3 20.0 2
Wyoming 43.2 4 10.1 7 34.1 6 102.6 7 16.3 6
SD Has Higher Rates of Some Cancers
42
-
43
ONE-TIME INCREASE OF
$82.50
RECOMMENDED ONE-TIME
INCREASE OF $232NO PLAN CHANGES
RECOMMENDED PLAN CHANGES AND RATE
INCREASE OF$8,470+$82.50 $10,071+$232 $738
Employer Rate $8,552.50 $10,303 $10,071 $10,809Actual Estimated Estimated Estimated
FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2021
Total Revenue $130,118,610 $149,517,701 $148,046,488 $156,830,840
Total Expenses $145,846,524 $149,516,154 $157,323,087 $156,823,087
Current Year Over/(Underrecovery) ($15,727,914) $1,547 ($9,276,599) $7,753
Prior Year Over/(Underrecovery) $15,836,221 $108,307 $109,854 $109,854
Cumulative Over/(Underrecovery)**/Reserve Level $108,307 $109,854 ($9,166,745) $117,607
IBNP/Allowable Reserve Level $15,544,100 $16,128,000 $17,208,000 $17,208,000(Incurred But Not Paid included in claims amount)
**Cumulative Over/(Underrecovery) is the analysis of the revenues and expenses since the beginning of the program.When this line is zero we have collected enough to pay all liabilities for this program that would be paid out in the next fiscal year. Any amount above zero is considered reserve.
5% Expense Increase Expected in FY21
FY19-FY21 Slide Update 02-06-20
ONE-TIME INCREASE OF $82.50RECOMMENDED ONE-TIME INCREASE OF $232NO PLAN CHANGES RECOMMENDED PLAN CHANGES AND RATE INCREASE OF
$8,470+$82.50$10,071+$232$738
Employer Rate$8,552.50$10,303$10,071$10,809
ActualEstimatedEstimatedEstimated
FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2021
Total Revenue$130,118,610$149,517,701$148,046,488$156,830,840
Total Expenses$145,846,524$149,516,154$157,323,087$156,823,087
Current Year Over/(Underrecovery)($15,727,914)$1,547($9,276,599)$7,753
Prior Year Over/(Underrecovery)$15,836,221$108,307$109,854$109,854
Cumulative Over/(Underrecovery)**/Reserve Level$108,307$109,854($9,166,745)$117,607
ENDING CASH BALANCE$34,936,277$28,516,102$16,665,704$23,134,360
IBNP/Allowable Reserve Level$15,544,100$16,128,000$17,208,000$17,208,000
(Incurred But Not Paid included in claims amount)
**Cumulative Over/(Underrecovery) is the analysis of the revenues and expenses since the beginning of the program.
When this line is zero we have collected enough to pay all liabilities for this program that would be paid out in the next fiscal year. Any amount above zero is considered reserve.
&"-,Bold"&14&18 State Employee Health Plan Full Accrual Financial Statement&14
&"-,Bold"&16
&F&D &T
-
Request $5.5M Increase for FYs 20 & 21
44
General Funds $1.5M Federal Funds $0.5MOther Funds $1.1MTotal $3.1M
FY21
FY20
General Funds $4.1M Federal Funds $1.7MOther Funds $4.2MTotal $10.0M
Fiscal Year 21�Department Budget�Employee Total CompensationBHR Partners to Achieve Other’s GoalsNo Budget Change is RecommendedExecutive Branch Employees1/3 of Employees Have 15 or More Years of ServiceSlide Number 6Pay Reported as Second Highest Reason for LeavingState Faces Significant Retirement RiskCompensationGovernor’s Budget Recommends No IncreaseMany Factors Impact Attraction and RetentionMarket Analysis and Pay Ranges Best Comparison97.8% of State Employees Paid Below Market666 People in SDSEHP and Medicaid in FY19Slide Number 15BenefitsSlide Number 17Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Total covered employees, pre-65 retirees, spouses, dependents, and COBRA participants on January 1, 2020*Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24FY19 High Cost Claimant Spending AnalysisSpecialty Drug Users and Costs Higher than Peers10 Drugs Account for 64% of Specialty Costs Wellness Participation Remains StrongSlide Number 29Numbers with Multiple Risks FallingBetter Wellbeing Avoids Higher SpendingPast Plan Changes Focused on UserFY21 Change Focused on Improving HealthSDSEHP Deductible Rising Faster than NationalLow Deductible Plan Not Aligned With MarketOut of Pocket Max Higher than MarketSD Contributes More for Individual CoverageFamily Contribution Lower than Other StatesEmployee Costs Highest Among NeighborsCovered Families Pay Much MorePlan Faces Several ChallengesSD Has Higher Rates of Some Cancers5% Expense Increase Expected in FY21Request $5.5M Increase for FYs 20 & 21