first and second generations solar cell technology (si)
TRANSCRIPT
FIRST AND SECOND GENERATIONS
Solar Cell Technology (Si)
Outlines
What is a Solar Cell History Basic physics of solar cells
Generations of Solar Cells First Generation Second Generation
3
History
1839 Alexandre-Edmond Becquerel Photovoltaic effect: Light dependant voltage immersing
between two electrodes in an electrolyte
1883 Carles Fritts First solar cell: Coated semiconductor selenium with an
extremely thin layer of gold to form the junctions (1% efficient)
1941 First silicon based solar cell demonstrated
1946 Russell Ohl Patented the modern solar cell
1954 Beginning of modern solar cell research Bell laboratories: Experimenting with semiconductors,
accidentally found that Si doped with certain impurities was very sensitive to light
4
A structure that converts solar energy directly to electricity by the photovoltaic effect It supplies voltage and current to a
resistive load (light, battery, motor)
It is like a battery It supplies DC power
It is not like a battery The voltage supplied by the cell changes with the changes of the load
resistance
The solar (photovoltaic) cell fulfills two fundamental functions: Photogeneration of charge carriers (electrons and holes) in a light-
absorbing material Separation of the charge carriers to a conductive contact to transmit
electricity
What Is a Solar Cell?
Illumination and Generation5
Ehν < EG : the incident light transparents
Ehν ≥ EG : photons are absorbed and EHP are
photogenerated Ehν > EG : energy generated is lost
as heat
Photovoltaic Effect
Solar cells are: p-n junctions Minority carrier devices Voltage is not directly applied Itotal = IF - IL = Is{exp(qV/kT)-1} – IL
The photo current produces a voltagedrop across the resistive load, which forward biases the pn junction
1. Absorption of a photon2. Formation of e-h pair (exciton)3. Exciton diffusion to Junction4. Charge separation5. Charge transport to anode (holes) and cathode (electrons)6. Supply a direct current for the load
6
Forward Bias vs. Photogeneration
Forward Bias Voltage applied
externally Current is dominated
by diffusion
Photogeneration Voltage is generated
internally from EHP being swept across the junction by and E field
Current is dominated by drift
Cell Structures
Homojunction Device Single material altered so that one side is p-type and the other
sideis n-type p-n junction is located so that the maximum amount of light is
absorbed near it
Heterojunction Device Junction is formed by contacting two different semiconductor Top layer - high bandgap selected for its transparency to light Bottom layer - low bandgap that readily absorbs light.
p-i-n and n-i-p Devices A three-layer sandwich is created Contains a middle intrinsic layer between n-type layer and p-
type layer Light generates free electrons and holes in the intrinsic
region.
8
Generations of Solar Cells
First Generation Single crystal silicon wafers (c-Si)
Second Generation Amorphous silicon (a-Si) Polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) Cadmium telluride (CdTe) Copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) alloy
Third Generation Nanocrystal solar cells Photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells
Gräetzel cells Polymer solar cells Dye sensitized solar cell (DSSC)
Fourth Generation Hybrid - inorganic crystals within a polymer matrix
9
First Generation: Overview
Dominant technology in the market More than 86% of the commercial production of solar
cells
High-cost, high-efficiency Maximum theoretical efficiency of 33%
Generally, Si based solar cells are more efficient and longer lasting than non-Si based cells. However, they are more at risk to lose some of their efficiency at higher temperatures (hot sunny days), than thin-film solar cells
10
First Generation: Crystalline Si-based Cells
Cells are typically made using a crystalline Si wafers Wafers about 0.3mm thick, sawn from ingot with diameter of
10-15cm
Consists of a large-area, high quality and single layer p-n junction diode A single junction for extracting energy from photons
Approaches Ingots can be either monocrystalline or multicrystalline Most common approach is to process discrete cells on
wafers sawed from silicon ingots. More recent approach which saves energy is to process
discrete cells on Si wafers cut from multicrystalline ribbons
Band gap ~1.12 eV
11
Crystalline Si-based Cells
Monocrystalline Si (c-Si) Made by Czochralski process, cut from cylindrical ingots
Not completely cover a square solar cell module without a substantialwaste
Expensive Extremely pure refined Si
Poly- or Multi-crystalline Si (poly-Si or mc-Si) Made from cast square ingots; melted Si is poured into a mold. Large
square blocks of molten Si carefully cooled and solidified Less waste of space, more expensive to produce than c-Si, but less
efficient
Ribbon Si A type of mc-Si Formed by drawing flat thin films from molten Si Lower efficiencies than poly-Si Save on production costs due to a great reduction in Si waste
Not require sawing from ingots
12
First Generation: Research Cells
Source: National Renewable Laboratory
13
First Generation: Evaluation
Advantages Broad spectral absorption range High carrier mobilities
Disadvantages High costs: Expensive manufacturing technologies
Extracting Si from sand and purifying it before growing the crystals Growing and sawing of ingots is a highly energy intensive process
Fairly easy for an electron generated in another molecule to hit a hole left behind in a previous photo excitation
Much of the energy of higher energy photons, at the blue and violet end of the spectrum, is wasted as heat
Not more energy-cost effective than fossil fuel sources With the max efficiency of 33%, it achieves cost parity with fossil fuel
energy generation after a payback period of 5-7 years
14
Second Generation: Overview
Thin-film solar cells Based on the use of thin-film deposits of semiconductors
Intense development for the 90s and early 2000s
Developed to reduce the costs of the first generation cells Alternative manufacturing techniques to reduce high temperature
processing evolves production costs Production costs will then be dominated by material requirements Inherent defects due to lower quality processing methods reduces
efficiencies compared to the first generation cells
Low-cost, Low-efficiency cells
15
Second Generation: Thin-Film Cells
Use minimal materials and cheap manufacturing processes Compared to crystalline Si based cells they are made from
layers of semiconductor materials only a few micrometers thick
Reduces mass of material required for cell design
Deposition of thin layers of materials on inexpensive substrates Mounted on glass or ceramic substrates
Devices initially designed to be high-efficiency, multiple junction photovoltaic cells
16
Second Generation: Types (a-Si)
Amorphous Si cells deposited on stainless-steel ribbon Non-crystalline-Si deposited over large areas by PECVD
Used to produce large-area photovoltaic solar cells Hydrogenated amorphous Si (a-Si:H)
Plasma-deposited amorphous Si contains a significant percentage of H atoms
Essential to the improvement of the electronic properties of the material Cells are built up in the sequence from bottom to top
Metal base contact, n-layer, intrinsic layer, p-layer, transparent contact, glass substrate
Instead of one layer, several thinner layers are used to prevent efficiency drop
Complex production methods, but less energy intensive For a given layer thickness, absorbs much more energy than c-Si
(×2.5) Not stable, less efficient than c-Si Bandgap~1.7eV
17
Second Generation: Types (poly-Si)
Polycrystalline (Micro Crystalline) Si Consists solely of crystalline silicon grains(1mm), separated by grain
boundaries Use antireflection layers to capture light waves with wavelengths
several times greater than the thickness of the cell itself Using a material with a textured surface both in front and back of the cell Light change directions and be reflected, and thus travels a greater
distance within the cell thickness Carrier mobilities can be orders of magnitude larger than amorphous
Si Material shows greater stability under electric field and light-induced
stress Low efficiency Fragile: Can be broken if hit by a falling branch or reasonably heavy
object flying through a strong wind Bandgap~1.1eV
18
Second Generation: Types (CdTe)
Cadmium telluride (CdTe) cells deposited on glass Represents the second most utilized solar cell material in the world Crystalline compound formed from Cd and Te with a zincblende (cubic)
crystal structure Usually sandwiched with cadmium sulfide (CdS) to form a p-n junction
photovoltaic solar cell Simplified manufaturing compared to the multi-step process of joining two
different types of doped Si CaTe absorbs sunlight at close to the ideal wavelength, capturing
energy at shorter wavelengths than is possible with Si panels Perfectly matched to the distribution of photons in the solar spectrum in
terms of optimal conversion to electricity Cheaper than Si, especially in thin-film technology Low efficiency levels (10.6%) Toxicity of Cd Bandgap~1.58eV
19
Second Generation: Types (CIGS)
Copper indium gallium diselenide (CIGS) alloy cells One of the best light absorber known
About 99% of the light is absorbed before reaching 1μm into the material
Deposited on either glass or stainless steel substrates More complex hetero-junction than CdTe
The most common material for the top/window layer is CdS hard to produce in mass quantities at competitive prices
Highest efficiency among the thin film material Reached efficiency levels of 20% in the laboratory
Better resistance to heat than Si-based solar cells Less toxic than CdTe solar cells
Uses a much lower level of Cd in CdS So far the cost cannot compete with the other solar cells Bandgap~1.38eV
20
Second Generation: Research Cells21
Source: National Renewable Laboratory
Second Generation: Evaluation
Advantages Lower manufacturing costs Much less material require
Lower cost/watt can be achieved Lighter weight (reduced mass)
Their flexibility allows fitting panels on curved surface, light or flexible materials like textiles
Less support is needed when placing panels on rooftops Even can be rolled up
Disadvantages Typically, the efficiencies are lower than first generation
cells
22
Summary
Technology
Com Eff (%)
Champ Eff(%)
Module ($/W)
Installed($/W)
LCOE(cents/kWh)
Wafer Si 15 25 2 8 17
a-Si 6.5 13 1.2 4.5 21.7
c-Si 5 10 1.3 4.8 18.3
CdTe 9 16.5 1.21 4.5 19.9
CIGS 9.5 19.5 1.8 6.3 22.2
Coal - - - - 5 ~ 8
Nov. 2007