finland a model for regional development. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9...

31
FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Upload: maleah-edkins

Post on 31-Mar-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Page 2: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

221

124

145

177

2115

986

133

1123456789

101112131415

Competitiveness

DM 3605411-2005 Copyright © Tekes

Total ranking 2003-2005Total ranking 2003-2005

Sources: IMD, The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005 andWEF, The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006

FinlandFinlandUSASwedenDenmarkTaiwanSingaporeIcelandSwitzerlandNorwayAustraliaNetherlandsJapanGreat BritainCanadaGermany

1123456879

101211151614

1123547

1086

1412

9111513

661

147

11348

159

132122

523

2004 20032005

WEFGrowth

competitiveness2005

WEFBusiness

competitiveness

IMDTotal compe-

titiveness2005

Page 3: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Growth and present competitiveness

DM 3605411-2005 Copyright © Tekes

Sources: IMD, The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005 andWEF, The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006

Growth competitiveness, position

Present competitiveness, position31 26 21 16 11 6 1

USA

Japan

New Zealand

Sweden

Norway

Germany

France

Singapore

Netherlands

Finland

Canada

Hongkong

Denmark

Australia

Iceland

Ireland

Taiwan

Austria

Switzerland

Great Britain

Belgium

Chile

Estonia

Israel

Korea

Malaysia

1

6

11

16

21

26

31

Page 4: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Competitiveness in technology and science

DM 3605411-2005 Copyright © Tekes

Sources: WEF The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006 andIMD The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005

USA

TaiwanSwedenDenmarkSwitzerlandKoreaJapanIcelandSingaporeNetherlandsIsraelNorwayAustraliaCanada

FinlandFinland

2004 20032005

WEFTechnology

1

5131114

29837

101220

6

1

104

135

152

16181914242617

1515 771

348765

151218

9131911

221

3456789

101112131415

221

246795

141116

8101713

33

IMDTechnology Science

2005 2005

Ranking 2003-2005Ranking 2003-2005

Page 5: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Competitiveness by region

Index of competitivenessWhole country = 100

100 - 134 (10) 90 - 100 (13) 80 - 90 (23) 70 - 80 (20) 59 - 70 (19)

Competitiveness clearly correlatesearnings growth, growth inemployment, net migration andeconomic development.

A large part of the competitivenessis explained by human capital,innovation and R&D investment.

DM 5862003-2004 Copyright © Tekes

Source: Huovari, Janne - Kangasharju, Aki - Alanen, Aku. 2001. Alueiden kilpailukyky.Pellervo Economic Research Institute PTT, Publication 176.

Page 6: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

FINLANDUSASwedenDenmarkTaiwanSingaporeIcelandSwitzerlandNorwayAustraliaNetherlandsJapanGreat BritainCanadaGermany

FINLANDUSASwedenDenmarkTaiwanSingaporeIcelandSwitzerlandNorwayAustraliaNetherlandsJapanGreat BritainCanadaGermany

Growth competitiveness

DM 3605411-2005 Copyright © Tekes

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

19

21

23

25

Ranking by WEFRanking by WEF

Source: WEF, The Global Competitiveness Report 2005-2006

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

Page 7: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Total competitiveness

DM 3605411-2005 Copyright © TekesSource: IMD, The World Competitiveness Yearbook 2005

* New formula

Ranking by IMDRanking by IMD

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

151995 1997 2002* 2003* 2005*1996 1998 1999 2000* 2001* 2004*

USA

Hong Kong

Singapore

Iceland

Canada

FINLAND

Denmark

Switzerland

Australia

Luxembourg

Taiwan

Ireland

Netherlands

Sweden

Austria

Page 8: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Investment and performance in theknowledge-based economy

Country positions in 2002

Performance level

Investment level6,5

6,0

5,5

5,0

4,5

4,0

3,5

3,0

2,5

2,02,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,5

Portugal

Finland

Sweden

Denmark

Germany

Austria

Netherlands

Great BritainFranceBelgium

IrelandEU 15

ItalySpain

Greece

DM 3605408-2005 Copyright © TekesSource: EU Key Figures 2005 on Science, Technology and Innovation

Page 9: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Country performance: Finland

Information society

Innovation and R&D

Liberalisation

Network industries

Financial services

Enterprise

Social inclusion

Sustainabledevelopment

The Lisbon DiamondThe Lisbon Diamond

DM 3605403-2005 Copyright © TekesSource: WEF, The Lisbon Review 2004

7.0

6.0

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

USAFinland

Page 10: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Ranking of EU countries

DM 3605403-2005 Copyright © Tekes

Denmark

Sweden

UK

Netherlands

Germany

Luxembourg

France

Austria

Belgium

Ireland

Spain

Italy

Portugal

Greece

Info

rmat

ion

soci

ety

Inno

vatio

n

and

R&D

Liber

alis

atio

n

Finan

cial

ser

vice

sEnte

rpris

eSoci

alin

clusi

onSust

aina

ble

devel

opm

ent

Netw

ork

indu

strie

s

1

3

2

6

4

7

5

9

8

11

10

14

12

13

15

1

4

2

6

7

3

13

5

9

8

10

11

12

14

15

1

2

6

3

5

8

4

7

10

9

12

11

13

14

15

4

1

2

8

7

3

5

6

9

10

15

12

13

11

14

1

3

4

2

7

8

5

6

10

11

9

12

13

14

15

3

2

5

1

7

10

6

9

12

8

4

11

15

13

14

2

1

2

8

4

12

5

9

7

6

10

11

13

14

15

1

4

3

7

6

2

8

9

5

10

13

12

11

14

15

The Lisbon reviewThe Lisbon review

Source: WEF, The Lisbon Review 2004

FinlandFinland

Totalrank

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Page 11: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Total productivity in some OECD countries

-0,5 0,5 1,5 2,5 3,5 4,5

Spain

Denmark

Italy

Belgium

Japan 1)

Germany 1)

Sweden

Netherlands

Great Britain

Canada 2)

France 1)

USA 2)

Australia 1)

Greece

FINLAND

Ireland

1995-20011990-1995

Average annual growth, percent

%

DM 36097 and 3605403-2005 Copyright © TekesSource: OECD Productivity database

1) 1995-20022) 1995-2003

The comparison is based on figures harmonizedby prices of ICT products.

Page 12: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Growth in labour productivity 1990-2002

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5

SwitzerlandSpain

New ZealandNetherlands

IcelandCanada

USAFrance

BelgiumDenmark

ItalySwedenGreeceJapan

GermanyGreat Britain

AustraliaFinlandNorway

PortugalKorea

Ireland

Source: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003DM 36097 and 36054

01-2004 Copyright © Tekes

GDP per hour worked, annual change

The whole national economyThe whole national economy

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 %

Page 13: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Growth in turnover and employment of foreign affiliates in manufacturing

Average annual growth rate, 1995-2001Turnover, %

Employment, %

France

USA

ItalyAustria

Netherlands

Germany

0

-5

5

10

15

20

0-5 5 10 15

Portugal

Luxembourg

Great Britain

HungaryIreland

Finland

SwedenJapan

Norway

DM 3605401-2005 Copyright © TekesSource: OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook, 2004

Page 14: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Source: A.T. Kearney & Foreign Policy Magazine: Globalization Index

Globalisation of countries

DM 3605405-2005 Copyright © Tekes

Globalisation index measures the economic integration, technicalconnections, personal contacts and political cooperation in the country.

Czechia

Great BritainNew Zealand

Netherlands

Switzerland

Ranking in 2005Ranking in 2005

Singapore

Croatia

NorwayAustralia

SwedenDenmark

Austria

USA

Canada

FinlandFinland

Ireland

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 1615 … .. ..

Page 15: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Inclination for entrepreneurship

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Finland

Netherlands

Belgium

Sweden

Austria

Denmark

Germany

Great Britain

France

EU15

Greece

Italy

Spain

Ireland

USA

Portugal

%

Willingness for self-employment

DM 3605404-2005 Copyright © Tekes Source: Flash Eurobarometer 160, 2004

The survey is based on approx. 21 000 telephone interviews

Page 16: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Networking between biotechnology companies

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Cooperation inthe same

centre

Cooperation inthe same city

Cooperationelsewhere in

Finland

Internationalcooperation

R&D cooperation between companies,universities and research institutes

R&D cooperation between companies,universities and research institutes

Source: Findings of the ETLA survey on Finnish Biotechnology Firms, Raine Hermans and Terttu Luukkonen, ETLA Discussion Papers No. 819 DM 58620

07-2003 Copyright © Tekes

Company established before 1991

Company established 1991-1996 

Company established in 1997or later

%

Page 17: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 18: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 19: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 20: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 21: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Network of universities, polytechnics, publicresearch institutes and technology centres

in Finland

DM 5862003-2004 Copyright © Tekes

UniversityRegional university unit

PolytechnicPolytechnic regional unit

VTT, Technical ResearchCentre of Finland or otherpublic research instituteRegional unit of public sector research institute

Technology centre

Page 22: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 23: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 24: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

ETLA/Terttu Luukkonen

Location of Finnish biotech firms

Helsinki reg ion (44)

Turku reg ion (30)

Tam pere (7)

Kuopio (17)

Oulu reg ion (9)

Location of a s ing le firm

Biotech agglom eration,num ber of firm s in brackets

© Etlatieto ltd

Page 25: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Regional networking with partners from Oulu in electronics and telecommunications programmes

DM 5862003-2004 Copyright © Tekes

Includes partners who participated in at least three projects in Tekes Electronics and Telecommunications technology programmes.

Lappeenranta University of Technology (Lappeenranta)

Salcomp Oy (Kemijärvi)

CCC (Oulu)

Sonera (Helsinki)

Nokia Mobile Phones (Oulu)National Semiconductor Finland Oy,former Fincitec Oy (Kemi)

University of Oulu (Oulu)

Efore Oy (Helsinki)

Projekti-Insinöörit Oy (Helsinki)

Cybelius Software Oy (Oulu)

Teleste (Turku)

Tampere University of Technology (Tampere)

Nokia Networks (Oulu)

ADC Telecommunications Oy (Oulu)

VTT, Technical ResearchCentre of Finland (Helsinki)

Helsinki University of Technology (Espoo)

JOT Automation Oy (Oulu)

Nokia Research Center (Helsinki)

VTT, Technical ResearchCentre of Finland (Oulu)

Extrabit Oy (Oulu)

ABB (Helsinki)

NetHawk Oy (Oulu)

Elektrobit Oy (Oulu)

Vaisala Oyj (Helsinki)

Polar Electro Oy (Oulu)

Filtronic LK Oy (Oulu)

Aspocomp Oy (Helsinki)

Elcoteq Network Oyj (Lohja)

Planar Systems Oy (Helsinki)Ultraprint Oy (Oulu)

Suunto Oy (Helsinki)

Picopak (Lohja)Nokia Mobile Phones (Salo)

Page 26: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 27: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 28: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005

Regional networking with partners from Turku in electronics and telecommunications programmes

DM 5862003-2004 Copyright © Tekes

Includes partners who participated in at least three projects in Tekes Electronics and Telecommunications technology programmes.

Miratel Oy (Turku)

Nokia Multimedia Terminals (Turku)

Finnish Broadcasting Company (Helsinki)

Sonera (Helsinki)

Elisa Communications (Helsinki)

University of Oulu (Oulu)Nokia Research Center (Helsinki)

Tampere University of Technology (Tampere)

Helsinki University of Technology (Espoo)

Teleste (Turku)

Wallac Oy (Turku)

Satel Oy (Salo)

VTT (Helsinki)

ADC Telecommunications Oy (Oulu)

Filtronic LK Oy (Oulu)

Mariachi Oy (Turku)

VTT (Oulu)

ABB (Helsinki)

Nokia Mobile Phones (Tampere)

Nokia Networks (Tampere)

Page 29: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 30: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005
Page 31: FINLAND A MODEL FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 2 2 1 12 4 14 5 17 7 21 15 9 8 6 13 3 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Competitiveness DM 36054 11-2005