finite population mixed models sampling, wls, and mixed...

13
SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1 Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models Models Ed Stanek and Julio Singer Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of Mass, Amherst, and U of Sao Paulo, Brazil U of Sao Paulo, Brazil II ESAMP Meetings Nov 6, 2009 Natal, Brazil 2 Finite Population Mixed Models Finite Population Mixed Models Research Group Research Group Luz Mery Gonzalez, Columbia; Viviana Lencina, Argentina; Julio Singer, Brazil; Silvina San Martino, Argentina; Wenjun Li, US; and Ed Stanek US Background Motivation: – 2-stage cluster sample of hospitals n Hospitals m Appendectomy operations per hospital – What is the average cost of an operation at a selected hospital (latent value)? Choices: – Use average cost of m operations for selected hospital – Use ‘shrunk’ cost- regressing to the mean for other sample hospitals. Which should we use? SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4 Consider/Account for: Study Design Sampling Response Error Model Assumptions How do we make up models to get better How do we make up models to get better insight from limited information? insight from limited information? What is a subject’s saturated fat intake? An Example SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5 Seasons Study UMASS Seasons Study UMASS Worc Worc SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst SPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6 Seasons Study UMASS Seasons Study UMASS Worc Worc- focus on 3 subjects focus on 3 subjects

Upload: others

Post on 09-Apr-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 11

Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Sampling, WLS, and Mixed Models Models

Ed Stanek and Julio SingerEd Stanek and Julio SingerU of Mass, Amherst, and U of Mass, Amherst, and

U of Sao Paulo, BrazilU of Sao Paulo, Brazil

II ESAMP MeetingsNov 6, 2009Natal, Brazil

22

Finite Population Mixed Models Finite Population Mixed Models Research GroupResearch Group

Luz Mery Gonzalez, Columbia; Viviana Lencina, Argentina; Julio Singer, Brazil; Silvina San Martino, Argentina; Wenjun Li, US; and Ed Stanek US

BackgroundMotivation: – 2-stage cluster sample of hospitals

n Hospitals– m Appendectomy operations per hospital

– What is the average cost of an operation at a selected hospital (latent value)?

Choices:– Use average cost of m operations for selected

hospital– Use ‘shrunk’ cost- regressing to the mean for other

sample hospitals. Which should we use?

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 44

• Consider/Account for:

Study Design

Sampling

Response Error

• Model Assumptions

How do we make up models to get better How do we make up models to get better insight from limited information?insight from limited information?

What is a subject’s saturated fat intake?

An Example

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 55

Seasons Study UMASS Seasons Study UMASS WorcWorc

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 66

Seasons Study UMASS Seasons Study UMASS WorcWorc--focus on 3 subjectsfocus on 3 subjects

Page 2: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 77

The ProblemThe Problem--SimplifiedSimplifiedObserve:Observe:–– 1 Measure of 1 Measure of SFatSFat on each Subjecton each Subject

Assume: Assume: –– Response Error (RE) Variance knownResponse Error (RE) Variance known

Question: Question: –– How do we estimate SubjectHow do we estimate Subject’’s True Sat Fat intake?s True Sat Fat intake?

Begin with a Response Error Model Begin with a Response Error Model …… which leads towhich leads to……..–– Mixed ModelMixed Model–– Finite Population Mixed Model Finite Population Mixed Model

Daisy Lily Rose

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 88

PopulationPopulation

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 99

PopulationPopulationSetSet

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1010

11

Response

4

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1111

11

Response

0

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1212

9

Response

4

Page 3: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1313

11

Response

4

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1414

9

Response

4

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1515

11

Response

0

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1616

11

Response……..

04

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1717

Response Error Model for SetResponse Error Model for Set( )Ejk R jk jkY Y E= +

99 1111

0.50.5 0.50.5

1kY

( )1kP Y

( )ER jk jY y=

1 10y =

00 44

0.50.5 0.50.5

2kY

( )2kP Y2 2y =

jk j jkY y E= +

( ) 2varR jk jY σ=

21 1σ =

22 4σ =

1j = 2j =

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1818

Summary Response Error ModelSummary Response Error Model

j j jY y E= +

1 1 1Y y E= + 2 2 2Y y E= +

21 1σ = 2

2 4σ =

Latent Value

Page 4: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 1919

ReRe--parameterized RE Modelparameterized RE Model

1

1 n

jj

yn

μ=

= ∑

2

2 2 2

2 Y y E

Eμ β= += + +

1 1 1

1 1 Y y E

Eμ β= += + +

Mean Latent ValueMean Latent Value--of what?:of what?: or the Setthe Population

1

1 N

jj

yN

μ=

= ∑SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2020

2 μ β= + +1 μ β= + +

11E 12E21E 22E

21 1σ = 2

2 4σ =

Generating Response in the RE ModelGenerating Response in the RE Model

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2121

2 μ β= + +1 μ β= + +

11E 12E21E 22E

1E1Y 2Y 2E

Generating Response in the RE ModelGenerating Response in the RE Model

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2222

6 4 = + − +6 4 = + +

-1 1 -2 2

-1 -29 0

Generating an Observed Response Generating an Observed Response in the RE Modelin the RE Model

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2323

Sample SpaceSample Space

Response Error ModelResponse Error Model

9 4 11 4

9 0 11 0

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2424

Response Error ModelResponse Error Model

j j jY Eμ β= + +

1j = 2j =9 4 11 4

9 0 11 0

Page 5: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2525

Mixed Model (MM)Mixed Model (MM)*j j jY a Eμ= + +

1j = 2j =

Random Effect

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2626

Mixed Model (MM)Mixed Model (MM)*j j jY a Eμ= + +

1j = 2j =

( )E 0jaξ =

( ) 2var jaξ γ=

Latent Value*j j j

j j

Y a E

P E

μ= + +

= +

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2727

μ= + + μ= + +

Mixed Model (MM) in actionMixed Model (MM) in action

1 β2β ( )22

1

11

n

jj

yn

γ μ=

= −− ∑

11E 12E 21E 22E

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2828

μ= + + μ= + +

Mixed Model (MM) Mixed Model (MM) ……..

1β 2β

11E 12E

1E 2β

21E 22E

2E*1Y *

2Y

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 2929

μ= + + μ= + +

Mixed Model (MM) Mixed Model (MM) …….??.??

1 β2β

11E 12E 21E 22E

2E*1Y *

2Y2β 1E 1 β

Who Are They?? ?

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3030

6 = + +6 = + +

Mixed Model (MM)Mixed Model (MM)

-4

1− 1 2− 2

23 12-4 1 4

What Does it Mean?? ?

4

????

Page 6: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3131

Sample Space (MM)Sample Space (MM)

3 12

9 4 11 4

9 0 11 0

1 8 3 8

1 12

Real

Artificial

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3232

MMMM--Latent Values?Latent Values? *j j jY P E= +

Daisy (j=1)Daisy (j=1) Rose (j=2)Rose (j=2)

33 22 11 1212 1010 22

11 22 --11 1212 1010 22

33 22 11 88 1010 --22

11 22 --11 88 1010 --22

1111 1010 11 44 22 22

99 1010 --11 44 22 22

1111 1010 11 00 22 --22

99 1010 --11 00 22 --22

*1Y *

2Y1P 2P1E 2E

Sam

ples

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3333

What are they What are they (for Daisy)? (for Daisy)?

*j j jY P E= +

Daisy (j=1)Daisy (j=1) Rose (j=2)Rose (j=2)

33 22 11 1212 1010 22

11 22 --11 1212 1010 22

33 22 11 88 1010 --22

11 22 --11 88 1010 --22

1111 1010 11 44 22 22

99 1010 --11 44 22 22

1111 1010 11 00 22 --22

99 1010 --11 00 22 --22

*1Y *

2Y1P 2P1E 2E

Sam

ples

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3434

*j j jY P E= +

Daisy (j=1)Daisy (j=1) Rose (j=2)Rose (j=2)

33 22 11 1212 1010 22

11 22 --11 1212 1010 22

33 22 11 88 1010 --22

11 22 --11 88 1010 --22

1111 1010 11 44 22 22

99 1010 --11 44 22 22

1111 1010 11 00 22 --22

99 1010 --11 00 22 --22

*1Y *

2Y1P 2P1E 2E

Sam

ples

What are they What are they (for Rose)?(for Rose)?

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3535

BLUPsBLUPs of the MMof the MM--Latent ValueLatent Value( )E 0jaξ =

( ) 2var jaξ γ=

( ) 2varR j jE σ=( )*

j j j

j j

Y a E

P E

μ= + +

= +

( )*ˆ ˆ ˆj j jP k Yμ μ= + −2

2 2jj

k γγ σ

=+

*

1

ˆn

j jj

w Yμ=

=∑ jj

kw

nk=

( ) 2 1ˆvar 1 jR j j j j

kP P k

nkξ σ−⎛ ⎞

− = +⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3636

Daisy (j=1)Daisy (j=1) Rose (j=2)Rose (j=2)

3.13.1 22 0.810.81 11.511.5 1010 2.192.191.21.2 22 1.151.15 11.411.4 1010 1.861.863.13.1 22 0.710.71 7.77.7 1010 5.245.241.11.1 22 1.281.28 7.67.6 1010 5.795.7910.910.9 1010 1.281.28 4.44.4 22 5.795.798.98.9 1010 0.710.71 4.34.3 22 5.245.2410.810.8 1010 1.151.15 0.640.64 22 1.861.868.98.9 1010 0.810.81 0.520.52 22 2.192.19

1P 2P

Sam

ples

1P

MSE of MSE of BLUPsBLUPs for MMfor MM--Latent ValuesLatent Values

2P

Ave=0.986 Ave=3.768

( )2

1 1P P− ( )2

2 2P P−

Page 7: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3737

MSE of MSE of BLUPsBLUPs ||P=yP=yDaisy (j=1)Daisy (j=1) Rose (j=2)Rose (j=2)

10.9010.90 1010 0.810.81 4.414.41 22 5.795.798.938.93 1010 1.151.15 4.294.29 22 5.245.2410.8410.84 1010 0.710.71 0.640.64 22 1.861.868.878.87 1010 1.281.28 0.520.52 22 2.192.19

1P 2P

Sam

ples

2P1P

MSE=Ave=0.986 MSE=Ave=3.768

( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )* *

*

2 2 22 2 2 2

1

2 1ˆ ˆE | 1 1n

jR j j j j j jj j

j

kP P k w y k

nkσ μ σ

=

⎡ ⎤⎡ ⎤ −⎛ ⎞− = = − + − + +⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠⎣ ⎦ ⎣ ⎦

∑P y

( )2

1 1P P− ( )2

2 2P P−

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3838

Population

Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 3939

Response Error ModelResponse Error Model

1 1 1Y y E= +3 3 3Y y E= +

21 1σ = 2

3 4σ =

Latent Values s s

s s

Y y EEμ β

= +

= + +

2 2 2Y y E= +

22 100σ =

1 10y = 2 3y =3 2y =

1

1 N

ss

yN

μ=

= ∑

Accounting for Sampling

isU

11 12 1

21 22 2

1 2

N

NI

n n nN

U U UU U U

U U U

⎛ ⎞⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟=⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠

U

*

1

N

Ii is ss

Y U Y=

=∑

Indicator random variable, 1 if ithSelected sample subject is subject “s”

s s sY Eμ β= + +

1

N

i is ss

b U β=

=∑*

1

N

i is ss

E U E=

=∑

*Ii i iY b Eμ= + +*I n I Iμ= + +Y 1 U β U E

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4141

Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)

1 β3β ( )22

1

11

N

ss

yN

γ μ=

= −− ∑2 β

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

1 β

11E 12E1i = 2i =

21E 22E

μ= + + 1E 1E*1IY *1IY μ= + +*

1IY *1IY

1,...,i n=

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4242

Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)

1β 3β2β

1 β

11E 12E1i = 2i =

21E 22E

μ= + + 1E1E*

1IY μ= + +*1IY*

1IY *1IY

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

Page 8: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4343

Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)

1 β3β2 β

1 β

11E 12E1i = 2i =

μ= + + 1E*1IY μ= + +*

1IY *1IY2 β*

1IY

21E 22E

1E

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4444

Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)Finite Population Mixed Model (FPMM)

1β 3β2β

1i = 2i =

μ= + +*1IY μ= + +*

1IY 2 β*1IY

21E 22E

1E3β

*1IY

21E 22E

1E

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

4545

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

9 4

9 0 11 0

11 4

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4646

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

0 11 4 11

0 9 4 9

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4747

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

-7 4 13 4

-7 0 13 0SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4848

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

0 13 4 13

0 -7 4 -7

Page 9: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 4949

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

-7 11 13 11

-7 9 13 9SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5050

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space ……

9 13 11 13

9 -7 11 -7

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5151

FPMMFPMM-- Sample Space Sample Space

11 1311139 -711 -7

-7 1113 11-7 913 9

9 411 49 011 0

0 114 110 9 4 9

0 134 130 -74 -7

-7 413 4-7 013 0

All sample points are Potentially Observable

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5252

FPMMFPMM-- BLUPsBLUPs of Realized Latent Valuesof Realized Latent Values

1β 3β2β

1i = 2i =

μ= + +*1IY μ= + +*

2IY

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5353

1 β3β2 β

1 β

11E 12E1i = 2i =

21E 22E

μ= + +*1IY *1IY μ= + +*

1IY*2IY

FPMMFPMM-- BLUPsBLUPs of Realized Latent Valuesof Realized Latent Values

1E 2E

* *Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5454

( )22

1

11

N

ss

yN

γ μ=

= −− ∑

*Ii i iY b Eμ= + +

FPMMFPMM-- BLUPsBLUPs of Realized Latent Valuesof Realized Latent Values

( )E 0p ib =

( ) 2varp ib γ=( ) 2varR i iE σ=

( ) 2varpR iE σ=( ) 2 2

1

1varN

pR i ss

EN

σ σ=

= = ∑

1β 3β2β

Page 10: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5555

FPMMFPMM-- BLUPsBLUPs of Realized Latent Valuesof Realized Latent Values

( )*Ii IiP Y k Y Y= + −

2

2 2k γγ σ

=+

*

1

1 n

Iii

Y Yn =

= ∑

( )* *

*

Ii i i

Ii i

Y b E

P E

μ= + +

= +

( ) ( )2

ˆvar 1 1pR Ii IiP P k nnσ

⎡ ⎤− = + −⎣ ⎦

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )22 22 21 1ˆ | 2 2 1 1pR Ii Ii j h j hhMSE P P I n k k k k yn n

σ σ μ⎡ ⎤− = − + + − + − −⎣ ⎦

Sample Sequence

2 2

1

1 n

h jjn

σ σ=

= ∑1

1 n

h jj

yn

μ=

= ∑SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5656

Comparison of MMComparison of MM--BLUP and BLUP and FPMMFPMM--BLUPBLUP

MM-BLUP FPMM-BLUP

Target Random Variable

MM-Latent Value

Latent Value

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5757

Comparison of MMComparison of MM--BLUP and BLUP and FPMMFPMM--BLUPBLUP

MM-BLUP FPMM-BLUP

Predictor ( )*Ii IiP Y k Y Y= + −

*

1

1 n

Iii

Y Yn =

= ∑

2

2 2k γγ σ

=+

( )*ˆ ˆ ˆj j jP k Yμ μ= + −

2

2 2jj

k γγ σ

=+

*

1

ˆn

j jj

w Yμ=

=∑

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5858

Comparison of FPMMComparison of FPMM--BLUP and BLUP and MMMM--BLUPBLUP--Sample SpaceSample Space

11 1311139 -711 -7

-7 1113 11-7 913 9

0 114 110 9 4 9 0 134 130 -74 -7

-7 413 4-7 013 09 411 4

9 011 0

1 123 121 8 3 8Artific

ial

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 5959

To Compare, Focus onTo Compare, Focus on……THIS Sample SpaceTHIS Sample Space

11 1311139 -711 -7

-7 1113 11-7 913 9

0 114 110 9 4 9 0 134 130 -74 -7

-7 413 4-7 013 09 411 4

9 011 0

1 123 121 8 3 8

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6060

Bigger Sample (n=3) Population (N=4)

Page 11: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6161

n=3, What is Lilyn=3, What is Lily’’s Latent value?s Latent value?•• Use n=3 subject effects for MMUse n=3 subject effects for MM1 possible sample set1 possible sample set

11

4

1311

4

-7

9

0

-7 11

0

-7

11

4

1311

4

3

9

0

-711

0

3

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6262

n=3, What is Lilyn=3, What is Lily’’s Latent value?s Latent value?•• 8 sample points8 sample points

11 1311-7

11 1311-7

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6363

n=3, What is Lilyn=3, What is Lily’’s Latent value?s Latent value?•• 8x(6 permutations)=48 sample points8x(6 permutations)=48 sample points

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6464

n=3, What is Lilyn=3, What is Lily’’s Latent value?s Latent value?

CombinationsCombinations4

43

Nn

⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟

⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6565

n=3, What is Lilyn=3, What is Lily’’s Latent value?s Latent value?192 Sample Points192 Sample Points

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6666

Select one sequenceSelect one sequence

Page 12: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6767

Select one sequence, Select one sequence, Observe Sample PointObserve Sample Point

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6868

FPMMFPMM--Average MSE of Predictor over Average MSE of Predictor over PermutationsPermutations

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 6969

11 11 11 111311-7

Ave MSEAve MSE

5.05.0

16.2 16.2 FPMMFPMM

4.64.6

MMMM

XX

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7070

11 11 11 111311-7

34.3 34.3 FPMMFPMM

17.717.7

29.429.4

Ave MSEAve MSE

MMMM

XX

Summary MSE ResultsSample Set MM FPMM

Set j=1 j=2 j=3 Target MSE MSE1 Daisy Lily Rose Mean 2.667 11.6671 Daisy Lily Rose Daisy 0.9931 15.6791 Daisy Lily Rose Lily 12.3195 34.1651 Daisy Lily Rose Rose 3.7561 9.785

2 Daisy Lily Violet Mean 7.409 14.0002 Daisy Lily Violet Daisy 0.993 18.3622 Daisy Lily Violet Lily 17.765 34.311 2 Daisy Lily Violet Violet 18.929 18.487

3 Daisy Rose Violet Mean 2.464 3.3333 Daisy Rose Violet Daisy 0.994 3.647 3 Daisy Rose Violet Rose 3.540 3.304 3 Daisy Rose Violet Violet 13.563 17.224

4 Lily Rose Violet Mean 3.066 14.333 4 Lily Rose Violet Lily 4.593 16.177 4 Lily Rose Violet Rose 3.345 13.751 4 Lily Rose Violet Violet 4.147 15.027

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7272

ConclusionsConclusionsPopulation

11 11 11 111311-7

Sample Space

FPMM-BLUP( )*

Ii IiP Y k Y Y= + −Design BasedDesign Based

Page 13: Finite Population Mixed Models Sampling, WLS, and Mixed ...people.umass.edu/~stanek/research/Sampling-WLS-MM-Natalv2.pdf · Ed Stanek and Julio Singer U of Mass, Amherst, and U of

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7373

ConclusionsConclusionsPopulation

11 11 11 111311-7

Design BasedDesign Based FPMM-BLUP

( )*Ii IiP Y k Y Y= + −

Evaluate Performance Conditional on the

Sample

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7474

ConclusionsConclusions

111311-7

Model BasedModel BasedMM-BLUP

( )*ˆ ˆ ˆj j jP k Yμ μ= + −

Conceptual “Priors”

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7575

ConclusionsConclusions

111311-7

Model BasedModel BasedMM-BLUP

( )*ˆ ˆ ˆj j jP k Yμ μ= + −

Evaluate Performance Conditional on the

Sample

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7676

ConclusionsConclusions

To Evaluate Performance of BLUP Estimators:– For Mixed Model: Condition on P=y

i.e. MM Latent Values match subject Latent Values

– For the FPMM: Condition on the sample set

MSE for BLUPs not evaluated Correctly– Extends to WLS estimate of mean

MM-BLUP not always best 111311-7

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7777

ThanksThanks

SPH&HS, UMASS AmherstSPH&HS, UMASS Amherst 7878

Any thoughts? Any thoughts? Next steps?Next steps?Questions?Questions?