fine-scale variations in aerosol transport within a street canyon – a pilot field study i.d....
TRANSCRIPT
Fine-Scale Variations in Aerosol Transport within a Street Canyon – a Pilot Field Study
I.D. Longley, M.W. Gallagher, M. Flynn, J.R. Dorsey, P.I. Williams
Physics Department,University Of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester, UK
SASUA Edinburgh Average Diurnal Particle Flux
Time (Local)
00:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 00:00
Par
ticle
Flu
x (#
cm
-2 s
-1)
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
Diurnal average vertical flux: fine mode (cm-2s-1)
00:00:00 04:00:00 08:00:00 12:00:00 16:00:00 20:00:00 00:00:00
Dp /
m
0.15
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.1
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
diurnal average of fine mode particle number concentrations
(0.1 m < Dp < 0.2 mm)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
N /
cm-3
Diurnal average of particle number flux (0.1 m < Dp < 0.2 m)
and sensible heat flux
-6000
-4000
-2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
w'N
' / c
m-2
s-1
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
hea
t flu
x / W
m-2
particle flux
heat flux
Campaign mean mass size distribution
Ultra-fine mode number concentrations
Fine mode number concentrations and fluxes
1000
10000
100000
1 10 100 1000
Dp / nm
dN
/dlo
g(D
p)
/ cm
-3
SW perp
up-canyon
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
0 2 4 6 8 10
Uroof / ms-1
N0.
1 /
cm-3
SW perp
Up-Canyon
NE perp
Normalised coarse particle concentration decay on 17th Oct
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
00:00 06:00 12:00 18:00 00:00
N/N
0 /
cm-3
2 to 4 micron fit
2 to 4 micron data
8 to 10 micron fit
8 to 10 micron data
decay rate constant, evening of 17th Oct, moderate wind
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
3 5 7 9
Dp / mm
dec
ay r
ate
/ d
ay-1
R2 of exponential decay fit for evening of 17th Oct
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
3 5 7 9
Dp / m
R2
fractional change in coarse mass concentration between 18:00 and 01:00 is dependent upon size and wind speed
0
1
2
3 5 7 9 2 to 10
Dp / mm
M/M
0
moderate wind
low wind
Coarse mode concentrations and fluxes
•One- and ten-minute number concentrations of ultra-fine aerosol (<100nm) concentrations at street level are very sensitive to air flow direction.
•When flow is from the road towards the pavement, concentrations at this side of the canyon are much higher, due mostly to increased numbers of less-diluted particles in the size range 10-80nm. This can lead to brief increases in concentration by an order of magnitude above the mean.
Coarse mode mass concentrations by size
16/10/2001 17/10/2001 18/10/2001 19/10/2001 20/10/2001
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
2 to 4 m4 to 6 m6 to 8 m8 to 10 m
Percentage fraction of total PM10-2
16/10/2001 17/10/2001 18/10/2001 19/10/2001 20/10/2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
2 to 4 m4 to 6 m6 to 8 m8 to 10 m
0
20
40
60
80
100
Frequency histogram of 1-minute N0.1 at 4m, week 1 with cumulative frequency curve
N0.1 / cm-3
0 50x103 100x103 150x103 200x103
n
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
•After wind direction, traffic flow rate and wind speed are the most important determinants of concentration.
•However, in perpendicular flow, wind speed in-canyon is poorly related to roof-level wind speed.
Fine mode (0.1-0.5m) number concentrations follow a diurnal cycle related to anthropogenic activity, particularly traffic flow.
•Emission fluxes also have a similar diurnal cycle, but more closely linked to sensible heat flux.
•The same conclusions were drawn above the urban canopy in the SASUA project in Edinburgh, see above (Dorsey et al, 2002).
The coarse mode behaviour could be split into three periods:
1. Decay following wind-driven re-suspension event,
2. Moderate wind diurnal cycle
3. Low wind diurnal cycle
•Decay rate was dependent upon size and wind speed.
•Particles in the size range 4-8m dominated during moderate winds.
•In high winds re-suspension of extra particles, especially in the range 8-10m, enhanced PM10.
Smoothed hourly average coarse mode mass emission flux, 17/10/01
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0:00 6:00 12:00 18:00 0:00
FM
/ g
cm-2
s-1
2 to 4 microns
4 to 6 microns
6 to 8 microns
8 to 10 microns
Normalised vertical turbulent variance at 3.5mseperated by wind direction
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5
U / ms-1
w/U
NE perpendicular
SW perpendicular
Up-Canyon
Turbulence
Vertical profiles of u,v,w/U with U>1 ms-1
02
46
81012
1416
1820
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
u,v,w/U
z /
m
sigma u
sigma v
sigma w
•Longitudinal (u) turbulence roughly double lateral (v) and vertical (w).
•At low wind speeds local sources (including traffic and) dominate.
•Turbulence also enhanced in perpendicular flow.
vertical profiles of parameterised traffic-induced vertical turbulence, wt,
for low and busy traffic flow rates (T / h-1)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
wt / ms-1
z/ m
T=300
T=1000
The component modes of PM10 varied independently due to differing transport characteristics.
•A two-week campaign in an asymmetric street canyon in Manchester with busy traffic (~20 000 vehicles.day-1) in October 2001.
•Measurements of ultra-fine (SMPS), fine (ASASP-X) and coarse (FSSP) size-segregated particle concentrations.
•Fine and coarse mode emission fluxes determined by eddy correlation.
SW perp
Up-canyon
NE perp
Down-canyon
Above: canyon site with definition of wind directions
day night
References:
Dorsey, J.R.; Nemitz, E.; Gallagher, M.W.; Fowler, D; Williams, P.I; Bower, K.N.; Beswick, K.M., 2002. Direct Measurements and Parameterisation of Aerosol Flux, Concentration and Emission Velocity Above a City. Atmos. Environ. 36, 791-800.
Longley, I.D.; Gallagher, M.W.; Dorsey, J.R.; Flynn, M.; Allan, J.D.; Alfarra, M.R.; D. Inglis, D.. A case-study of aerosol (4.6nm<Dp<10m)
number and mass size distribution measurements in a busy street canyon in Manchester, U.K. Atmos. Environ. [Accepted, 2002].
Vertical turbulence could be described by the parameterisation
w2 = (U)2 + wt
2 where wt2 = AT + B and T = traffic flow rate
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
Dp / m
dV/d
log(
Dp )
/
m3 cm
-3
SMPS
ASASP-X
FSSP
•In low winds, reduced deposition/dispersion in the size range 4-6m had the biggest effect on above-normal night-time coarse mass concentrations.
•Mass emission fluxes (left) followed a diurnal cycle, with an early-afternoon peak. Traffic peaks had more influence on larger sizes.
Above: N0.1 I.e. number concentration (4.6nm < Dp < 100nm)
Mass mode concentrations over 2 weeks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
10/14 10/16 10/18 10/20 10/22 10/24 10/26 10/28
PM
/ g
m-3
coarse mode 2-10 microns
fine mode 0.1-0.5 microns
ultra-fine mode <0.1 microns