fine particle characterisation and source apportionment in manila and hanoi from 2001-2005 using...
TRANSCRIPT
Fine Particle Characterisation and Source Apportionment in Manila
and Hanoi from 2001-2005 Using Nuclear
TechniquesDavid CohenANSTO, Australia
This talk will discuss:-
Ion Beam Techniques- what are they?
PMF methods for source apportionment
Fine particle (PM2.5) masses/ sources in Manila and Hanoi during 2001-05.
Further info can be found at our WEB site
http://www.ansto.gov.au/nugeo/iba/
Nuclear Method for Fine Particle Characterisation
Incident Ion Beam
Sputtered Atoms
X - RaysChannelled Ions
Light, UV
Scattered Ions
b ± Decay
Sample
Reaction Productsg - RaysProtonsNeutronsIons
Electrons
Recoiled
Backscattered Ions
What is Ion Beam Analysis (IBA)
Pass relativistic protons from accelerators through filters
Nuclear Interactions;
g-rays
Scattering
Recoil ….
Atomic Interactions;
X-rays
Channelling
Electrons….
STAR 2MV Tandetron ANSTO
PIGE
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
0 200 400 600
Energy (keV)
Cou
nts
/3 µ
C
511 keV
F 197 keV
Na 440 keV
(21±2) µg/cm2
PESA
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
0 1000 2000 3000
Energy (keV)
Cou
nts
/ 3 µ
C
H
5.4 µg/cm2
C,F
2.6 MeV protons
RBS
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 1000 2000 3000
Energy (keV)
Cou
nts
/ 3 µ
C
O
C
F
2.6 MeV protons
Four techniques cover most of the periodic table from H to U
PIXE
1
10
100
1,000
10,000
100,000
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
X-ray Energy (keV)
Co
un
ts/
3µ
C
Data
Bkg
Fit
S
Fe
Zn
Cl
KCa
Ti
Cu
Si
Al
PbLb
Mn
PbLa
Rb
Br
Pb=994 ng/m3
Accelerator Based Analyses
Basic advantages include:
High sensitivity (count individual atoms) Analyse small samples (pg) in few minutes Multi-elemental – H to Pb in one
measurement Non-destructive so can use other
techniques
100µg samples on air filters are ideally suited to these methods.
How to collect samples?
Cyclone and Stacked filter samplers at Hong Kong
Stacked filter heads
Stacked filter cassette
Clean and exposed filters
2.6MeV proton beam spot
Asian PM2.5 Sampling Sites (2001-2005)
Hong Kong
Cheju Is.
Manila
Hanoi
Sado Is.
Hong Kong
Dust
S
Dust Out of China in 2002
Manila
0
50100
150
200250
300
1/01
/200
1
1/07
/200
1
1/01
/200
2
1/07
/200
2
1/01
/200
3
1/07
/200
3
1/01
/200
4
1/07
/200
4
1/01
/200
5
1/07
/200
5
Mas
s (µ
g/m
3 )
Hanoi
0
50
100
150
200
250
1/01
/200
1
1/07
/200
1
1/01
/200
2
1/07
/200
2
1/01
/200
3
1/07
/200
3
1/01
/200
4
1/07
/200
4
1/01
/200
5
1/07
/200
5
Mas
s (µ
g/m
3 )
Fine Particle Mass PM2.5 at Manila and Hanoi 2001-05
US EPA PM2.5 annual goal 15µg/m3, 24hr goal 65µg/m3
Australia PM2.5 annual goal 8µg/m3, 24hr goal 25µm3
Av.=(46±20)µg/m3, max=260µg/m3 Av.=(54±34)µg/m3, max=222µg/m3
New Year
Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF)
Recent source apportionment techniques provide powerful one step methods to determine source fingerprints and their contributions to the measured mass
Sources (Fij) and their contributions (Gjk)
calculated directly from the original input data
matrix (Mjk).Mik = Fij * Gjk + err
= *
H to Pb
1 to
100
H to Pb
1 to
7
1 to
100
1 to 7
Typical Source Fingerprints Fij using IBA and PMF
Wind Blown Soil
Secondary Sulfur
Diesel/ Oil burning
Black carbon, soot
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Soil
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n 2ndryS
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Diesel/Oil
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Soot
Typical Source Fingerprints using IBA and PMF
Coal burning (Sea)Ca based Industry
AutomobilesSmoke, biomass burning
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Smoke
PMF210) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Auto3
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n IndCa
PMF2(10) PM2.5 Sources Hanoi 2001-06
0.000
0.001
0.010
0.100
1.000
H Na Al
Si P S Cl
K Ca Ti V Cr
Mn Fe
Co
Ni
Cu
Zn
Br
Pb
BC
Sou
rce
Fra
ctio
n Coal
Site %Sea %2ndryS
%Auto,Ind,Diesel,
Soot
%Soil %Smoke
Manila 7 Factors
1.1±2.2%
20±11%
60±13% 2.6±2%
17±11%
Hanoi 10 Factors
- 21±10%
58±13% 9.0±5%
12±6%
Mean Percentage Source Contributions
at Manila and Hanoi 2001-2005
Hanoi
0
4,000
8,000
12,000
16,000
1/04
/200
1
1/10
/200
1
1/04
/200
2
1/10
/200
2
1/04
/200
3
1/10
/200
3
1/04
/200
4
1/10
/200
4
1/04
/200
5
1/10
/200
5
S (
ng/
m3 )
Hanoi 30 Apr 03, 10 Oct 044 Day Back Trajectories (every 4hr)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140
Longitude
La
titu
de
Sites
300m
500m
Beijing
UlaanBaatar
Cheju Is.
Sado Is.
Hong Kong
Manila
Hanoi
10Oct04
30Apr03
Hanoi
05
1015202530
1/04
/200
1
1/10
/200
1
1/04
/200
2
1/10
/200
2
1/04
/200
3
1/10
/200
3
1/04
/200
4
1/10
/200
4
1/04
/200
5
1/10
/200
5
Soi
l (µ
g/m
3 )
Soil-Sulfate Transport to Hanoi
HYSPLIT 4 day back trajectories calculated every
4 hours
Manila PM2.5 1Jan01-26Dec04
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 500 1000 1500
Days after 1 Jan 01
Su
lfu
r (µ
g/m
3 ) 1 Jan Fireworks
13Oct04Oct03
Long Range Transport of Fine Sulfates
HYSPLIT 5 day back trajectories every 4 hours for 12 to 14 Oct 04 show high sulfur measured on 13 Oct 04 at Manila may originate from long range transport from South Korea. Similar long range patterns were observed for October of 2003.
Manila 12-14 Oct 045 Day Back Trajectories (every 4hr)
10
20
30
40
50
100 110 120 130 140 150
Longitude
Lat
itu
de
Sites
300m
500m
BeijingUlaanBaatar
Cheju Is.
Sado Is.
Hong Kong
Manila
Hanoi
Summary
Accelerator based IBA techniques, in particular, are ideal for generating large data sets containing many elements needed for characterisation and source modeling of air pollution.
20-40 elements are not uncommon. The larger the number of elements the better the sources are characterised.
Generally nuclear analytical methods are accurate, precise, fast and non destructive on microgram-picogram samples.
In many cases this is the only way this data can be obtained!
Acknowledgements
Our collaborators; Vuong Thu Bac at Institute of Nuclear
Sciences and Technology, Hanoi, and
Flora Santos at Philippines for Nuclear Research Institute, Manila
All the IBA accelerator staff at ANSTO