financial review - insideewu · financial review fiscal year 2018 2.23.18 ... budget planning...
TRANSCRIPT
Financial Review
Fiscal Year 2018
2.23.18
Overview
Governance: Financial statement focus
Prudent planning, financial management and
decision-making ensures EWU’s ability to respond to
a rapidly changing environment
Evaluate EWU’s performance in relation to industry
measures
2
AGENDA
Financial Results & Key Performance Indicators
Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility
Operating Results
Financial Asset Performance
Debt Management
Financial Outlook
3
•Access
•Retention
•Degree completion
•Graduation rates
Student
Success
•High quality
•Program array- students of the future
•Size of the University
•Enrollment levels
Academic Programs
•Ability to respond to changing environment
•Institutional Strategic Plan
•Strategic enrollment Plan
•Campus Master Plan
Strategic Planning
•EWU expands opportunities for personal transformation through excellence in learning.
Mission and Vision
•Future revenue growth
•Contain labor cost
•Use of debt capacity
•Financial flexibility
Sound Financial Position
Achieving the
Goals of the
EWU Board of
Trustees
4
Financial Resource Governance
Biennial Budget
Planning Process
Year 1-ongoing financial
management and internal
reporting
End of Year Reporting
Year 2 Supplemental
budget process
Year 2-financial
management and internal
reporting
Biennial feedback
5
Continuous
cycle of financial
planning,
management,
evaluation, and
reporting
Impacts to Eastern’s Financial Position
FinancesEnrollment Demand
Tuition
State Resources
Capital Planning
Auxiliaries
Financial Aid
Strategic Investments
Debt
6
RESOURCE SUFFICIENCY AND FLEXIBILITY
7
State Funding
Enrollment
Tuition Policy
Capital Funding
To support the University’s mission
Financial Results
Composite Financial
Index
Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
Performance
Return on Net Assets Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
Key Performance Indicator
Primary Reserve Ratio
A Changing Financial Environment
8
2015-17 Biennium• Tuition authority restriction
continues to impact future
opportunities
• Slower revenue growth
• Enrollment stability continues
• Campus initiatives provide
future opportunities
2011-13 Biennium• Decreasing funding
• Increasing costs
• $25M decline in State support
• Tuition impact
• Continued budget constraints
and reductions
2013-15 Biennium• Transforming for the future
• Slower revenue growth
• More dependent on tuition
• New Strategic Plan
2009-11 Biennium• Great Recession
• $33.4M reduction of state
support
• Tuition impact
• Internal budget reductions
• Staff reductions & salary freeze
2017-19 Biennium• State Tuition policy provides
minimal revenue growth
• Flat state revenue projection
• Revenue growth at a slower pace
• Goal – stabilize, grow, and
diversify enrollments
Key Funding Sources - State Funds and Student Tuition
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Millio
ns
Student Tuition State Funds
62%
38%
52%
48%
9
The College Affordability Act increased the state investment in
higher education beginning in FY16
State tuition policy is at 2.2%
Fund 001, 08A, 149 funding
Enrollment-12 Month
479,269 483,602 473,723 478,626 482,281
42,068 41,093 39,359 39,206 40,042
521,337 524,695 513,082 517,832 522,323
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
AY13-14 AY14-15 AY15-16 AY16-17 AY17-18
Student Credit Hours
Undergraduate SCH Graduate SCH Total
10
Note: SCH totals based on Fall – Summer term grouping
Source: EWU institutional Research Enrollment Reports, 10th day
10,653 10,750 10,555 10,636 10,685
1,195 1,167 1,164 1,139 1,167
11,848 11,917 11,719 11,775 11,852
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
IPEDS FTE Enrollment, based on quarter
equivalency
Undergraduate FTE Graduate FTE Total FTE
Source: IPEDS 12-month Enrollment Survey. Time frame: July - June
Index 1 core enrollment, self support and summer
session
Fall Enrollment
11,67812,411
11,300 11,217 11,473
1,1131,042
1,061 1,062 1,134
12,79113,453
12,361 12,27912,607
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Total Fall Head CountState and self support
Undergraduate HC Graduate HC Total HC
11
Source: EWU Institutional Research Enrollment Reports, 10th day
9,428 9,551 9,749 9,733 9,607 9,574
1,105 971 902 900 922 974
10,533 10,522 10,651 10,633 10,529 10,548
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018Undergraduate HC Graduate HC Total HC
State Support – Average Annual Head Count
Through FY18 enrollment has remained fairly stable.
Capital Appropriation History
12
$16.3
$10.7
$15.4$12.2
$30.5
$7.6
$15.1
$67.4
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
2011-13 2013-15 2015-17 2017-19
Millio
ns
Minor Works Major Projects
Includes construction funding for
the Interdisciplinary Science
Center
Source: Appropriation schedule - New appropriations only
State capital funding can fluctuate between biennia
and types of projects funded.
Financial Results and Key Performance Indicators
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
Performance
Return on Net Assets Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
13
Additional performance
indicators are utilized for
budgetary, financial and
enrollment management.
FY 2018 Impacts to Financial Position
2018 change
Total Revenues 237,519,865 0.03%
Operating revenues 148,693,641 0.5%
State operating appropriations 58,531,000 3.6%
Total revenues excluding capital
appropriations 231,932,052 2.2%
Total expenses 244,155,344 7.1%
Total expenses excluding 1x impacts 234,059,048 2.7%
Salaries 111,779,038 3.6%
Benefits 38,181,176 14.7%
19-Feb-1914
Major changes in revenues and expenses
FY 2018 Impacts to Financial Position
• Key Revenue Drivers– Enrollment- core enrollment was relatively flat
– Total revenues essentially flat
– Tuition and fee revenues, increased <1%
– State operating appropriations, increased 3.5%
– Grants and contracts, increased 5.7%
– Auxiliaries, down 5%
• Major Expense Categories– Salaries and wages, increased 3.5%
– Health benefits, increased 14.7%
– Operating expenses, down 4%
– Scholarships and fellowships, flat
15
• One-Time Impacts to Income Statement– Perkins loan program closeout, $3.97M, expense/liability, with future cash impact
– PUB asset value adjustment of $6.09M related to substantial demolition of existing building
(no cash impact)
– GASB 75- Other post employment benefits (OPEB), $70.9M beginning net position
adjustment and long term liability (no cash impact). Similar impact as GASB 68 beginning net
position adjustment in 2015 and GASB 73 impact in FY17
• Overall Income Statement– Before special items and capital appropriations- net loss $2.16M
– Overall decrease in net position $6.64M
– Adjustment to beginning net position $70.9M
16
FY 2018 Impacts to Financial Position
Composite Financial Index
• Overall measure of financial
health
• Combines the four key ratios using
industry standard weighting
• Influenced by enrollment changes, state
operating appropriations and tuition and
fee pricing changes
• Useful in understanding the financial
position of the institution in relation to an
industry standard
• Combined insight into the trends of the
institution’s key financial indicators
• Recommended Level = 3
17
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency
& Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
PerformanceReturn on Net Assets
Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
Source: EWU Financial Statements
3.39
2.22
2.732.15
-0.10
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Composite Financial Index
EWU CFI Recommended level
1.90
w/o 1x
impacts
Primary Reserve Ratio
• Are resources sufficient and flexible
enough to support the mission?
• Measures the financial strength by indicating
how long the institution could function without
additional income
• Over time ratio should support reserve levels to
ensure are keeping pace with institutional
growth
• Unrestricted net assets should increase at least
in proportion to the rate of growth in expenses
• Recommended Ratio is > .40
• Ratio components –
– Unrestricted and restricted expendable net
position
– Operating and non-operating expenses
18
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency
& Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
PerformanceReturn on Net Assets
Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
0.53
0.400.42 0.42
0.09
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Primary Reserve Ratio
EWU Base Linew/o 1x
impacts
Source: EWU Financial Statements
.39
Return on Net Position Ratio
• Does financial asset performance
support the strategic mission?
• A positive return indicates the institution is
financially better off than in previous years
by measuring total economic return
• An improving trend is indicative of
increasing net assets that will strengthen
the institution’s financial future
• A decline may be appropriate if it reflects a
strategy to investment in mission fulfillment
• Industry target ratio: 3 – 4%
• Ratio Components –– Change in net position
– Net assets (beginning of year)
19
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency
& Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
PerformanceReturn on Net Assets
Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
4.67%
0.54%
2.42%
2.72%
-2.27%
2.48%
2.43%
3.61%
1.69%
-3.00% -2.00% -1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00%
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Return on Net Position Ratio
Peer Median EWU
1.17%
w/o 1x impacts
Source: EWU Financial Statements Note: 2018 peer data not yet available
Viability Ratio
• Is debt managed strategically to
advance the mission?
• Measures the sufficiency of unrestricted
net position to satisfy debt obligations
• A higher ratio indicates more funds
available to cover debt
• FY17 issued revenue bonds to renovate
the PUB
• Many institutions operate effectively at less
than ratio 1:1 as state operating
appropriations are not included in the
calculation
• Desired ratio is > 1:1
• Ratio Components –– Unrestricted net position
– Long term debt – current and noncurrent
20
1.68
1.37
1.51
0.95
0.11
0.39
0.17
0.18
-0.08
-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Viability Ratio
Peer Median EWU w/o 1x
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency
& Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
PerformanceReturn on Net Assets
Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
Source: EWU Financial Statements Note: 2018 peer data not yet available
0.97
Net Operating Ratio
• Is the institution living within available
resources on an annual basis?
• Measures net operating revenues in contrast to
total operating revenues
• Measured before state capital appropriations
• Negative ratios indicate a net operating and non
operating deficit which may or may not be a
problem
• A decline in ratio from prior year indicates
operating expenses are increasing at a faster
rate than operating revenues
• Targeted ratio should be between 2% and 4%
• Ratio Components-– Net operating and non-operating income (loss)
– Total operating and non-operating revenue
21
Financial Results
Composite Financial Index
Resource Sufficiency
& Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
PerformanceReturn on Net Assets
Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
1.59%
-0.67%
1.52%
-0.40%
-2.64%
-5.00%
-4.00%
-3.00%
-2.00%
-1.00%
0.00%
1.00%
2.00%
3.00%
4.00%
5.00%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Net Operating Ratio
EWU
-0.93%
Source: EWU Financial Statements Note: 2018 peer data not yet available
w/o 1x impacts
OPERATING RESULTS
22
Income Statement
Revenue
Expenses
Net Assets
Do the operating results indicate the
university is managed within
available resources?
Financial Results
Composite Financial
Index
Resource Sufficiency & Flexibility
Primary Reserve Ratio
Operating Results
Net Operating Ratio
Financial Asset
Performance
Return on Net Assets Ratio
Debt Management
Viability Ratio
Key Performance Indicator
Net Operating Ratio
What does the Operating Statement mean?
23
At any level of overall
university assets, Eastern must
live within it’s annual income
over time.
Presents a change in net
financial position over the prior
year
Analysis of performance of the
university across the industry.
Expenditures represent the
cost of providing services in
support of achieving the
institutional mission.
University Revenues, Expenses and
Changes in Net Position
$2
19
.8
$2
22
.4
$2
22
.8
$2
33
.1
$2
37
.4
$2
37
.5
$1
93
.4
$2
05
.7
$2
20
.9
$2
24
.6
$2
27
.9
$2
44
.2
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
$200
$220
$240
$260
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Millio
ns
Revenues
Expenses
24
Total revenues (includes capital appropriations) were essentially flat. Total expenses
increased 7.1%, partly due to one-time impacts such as Perkins loan closeout and loss on
demolition of capital assets. Excluding one time impacts, expenses increased 2.7%.
Source: FY 2013-2018 Financial Reports
University Revenues
25
Source: EWU Office of Controller
2013- 2017 Financial Reports
$89.3 $94.0 $89.6 $85.0 $85.5
$53.4 $41.9 $53.2 $66.9 $64.1
$51.7 $57.2$55.5
$51.9 $54.6
$20.9 $23.1$29.1
$27.5 $26.0$7.0 $6.6
$5.7 $6.2 $7.2 $222.4 $222.8 $233.1 $237.4 $237.5
$0
$25
$50
$75
$100
$125
$150
$175
$200
$225
$250
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
mil
lio
ns
Student Tuition & Fees State Appropriations Grants & Contracts Auxiliaries Other Total
discretionary
dedicated
Total revenues were essentially flat over 2017
University Revenues – Five Year Comparison by Source
26
Source: 2014, 2018 Financial Report
Student Tuition &
Fees40%
State Appropriations
24%
Grants & Contracts
23%
Auxiliaries10%
Other3%
2014
Student Tuition &
Fees36%
State Appropriations
27%
Grants & Contracts
23%
Auxiliaries11%
Other3%
2018
University Expenses by Type
27
Source: EWU Office of Controller
2014-2018 Financial Report
$92.7
$100.6
$104.2
$107.9
$111.8
$36.8
$42.2
$39.6
$38.1
$38.1
$28.5
$28.5
$31.8
$33.3
$38.2
$21.9
$22.1
$20.8
$19.6
$19.5
$11.4
$12.1
$12.3
$12.5
$12.4
$4.9
$4.6
$4.4
$4.9
$4.3
$9.6
$10.8
$11.6
$11.6
$9.8 $10.1
$0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 $160 $180 $200 $220 $240 $260
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Millions
Salaries & Wages Supplies& Materials Benefits Scholarships & Fellowships Depreciation Utilities Miscellaneous Other
$220.9M
$205.7M
$244.2M
$224.4M
$227.9M
FY18- ‘Other’ includes 3.9M perkins loan program
closeout expense and 6.1M loss on demo of old PUB
Total expenses grew by 7.1%
Expenses without special items increased 2.7%
Salaries & wages increased 3.6%
Operating Expenses by Function
Instruction32.9%
Aux. Srvc15.7%
Scholarships10.9%
Ops. & Maint -plant9.2%
Student services8.0%
Institutional support7.7%
Academic support7.1%
Depreciation5.6%
Public Srvc & Rsrch3.1%
28
Instruction33.1%
Aux. Srvc15.4%
Scholarships8.6%
Ops. & Maint -plant8.2%
Student services9.1%
Institutional support7.9%
Academic support8.2%
Depreciation5.3%
Public Srvc & Rsrch4.3%
2014 2018
Source: 2014, 2018 Financial Report
BALANCE SHEET AND
INDICATORS
29
Does financial asset
performance support
the strategic mission?
Financial Results
Resource Sufficiency &
Flexibility
OperatingResults
Financial Asset
Performance
Debt Management
What does the Balance Sheet represent?
30
University Assets and
Liabilities at a point in time
A Comprehensive View of all
that Eastern Owns…
and all that Eastern Owes
Peer analysis of Performance
within an industry
Analyze Debt Capacity for
future capital investments
Balance Sheet Overview
31
Source: FY2018 Financial Report
All Funds2017
(millions)
2018(millions)
Total Assets and Deferred Outflows $526.1 $526.5
Total Liabilities and Deferred Inflows $163.2 $241.2
Net Position (at June 30) $362.9 $285.3
Assets- change in cash and investments due to PUB project; increase capital assets due to PUB project
Liabilities- increase Perkins loan program and GASB 75 OPEB liability
Deferred Inflows/Outflows- impacted due to change in pension and OPEB expenses
Net Position- GASB 75 impact and results of annual operations
Key Balance Sheet Indicators
32
Eastern has consistently remained
above the industry baseline with more
than $4 of current assets to cover every
$1 of current liabilities.
Source: EWU Office of Controller
FY 2017 Financial Report
4.033.66
4.924.56
4.26 4.233.99
4.98
4.28
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Current Ratio: Measure of Liquidity
Current Ratio Industry Baseline
33
Is debt managed
strategically to advance
the University’s mission?
Debt Management
Financial Results
Resource Sufficiency &
Flexibility
OperatingResults
Financial Asset
Performance
Debt Management
Debt Management and Oversight
• University Policy
• Debt Issuance approved by Board of Trustees
• Annual Report to Board of Trustees
– Compliance with policy
– Review of existing debt and associated covenants
– Debt capacity analysis
– Long term capital plans that require financing
– Pending debt financed projects
34
Key Balance Sheet Indicators
35
Eastern is managing debt levels in compliance
with the University debt policy.
2.1
5%
1.9
5%
2.3
3%
1.5
1%
2.0
2%
2.0
8%
2.0
3%
2.4
8%
2.0
7%
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
3%
4%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Financial Debt Burden Ratio: Measures dependence on debt as a source of financing the mission
Financial Debt Burden Ratio EWU Policy
Source: EWU Office of Controller
FY 2017 Financial Report
Another Financial Performance View: Moody’s Scorecard
36
Preliminary Scorecard Results
Prepared by PFM Financial Advisors, LLC
Eastern Washington University Scorecard Results - 2018Sub-Factor
WeightsValue Score Indicated Score
Factor 1: Market Profile: (30%)
Scope of Operations (Operating Revenue) ($000) 15% 214,528 5.2 A1
Reputation and Pricing Power (Annual Change in Operating Revenue) (%) 5% 1.9 10.7 Ba1
Strategic Positioning 10% A 6.0 A
Factor 2: Operating Performance: (25%)
Operating Results (Operating Cash Flow Margin) (%) 10% 6.6 6.1 A2
Revenue Diversity (Maximum Single Contribution) (%) 15% 61.1 5.9 A2
Factor 3: Wealth & Liquidity: (25%)
Total Wealth (Total Cash & Investments) ($000) 10% 140,042 4.4 Aa3
Operating Reserve (Spendable Cash & Investments to Operating Expenses) (x) 10% 0.67 3.0 Aa2
Liquidity (Monthly Days Cash on Hand) 5% 258 1.6 Aa1
Factor 4: Leverage: (20%)
Financial Leverage (Spendable Cash & Investments to Total Debt) (x) 10% 1.74 2.8 Aa2
Debt Affordability (Total Debt to Cash Flow) (x) 10% 5.86 2.4 Aa1
Moody’s Scorecard Results
• Results similar to FY17 (score 4.60),
yet weakening due to lack of revenue
growth.– Most notable change was cash flow operating
margin (6.6% vs 10.6% 2017)
– Anticipating continued revenue pressure;
expense containment continues to be critical
• Moody’s may also incorporate
qualitative, state, and industry factors
when determining a rating and
underlying outlook
• EWU’s current rating is A1 with a
stable outlook, September 2016
37
Weighted Score: 4.75
Scorecard Output A1
Existing Rating A1
Weighted Score Legend:
Aaa ≤ 1.5
Aa1 > 1.5, ≤ 2.5
Aa2 > 2.5, ≤ 3.5
Aa3 > 3.5, ≤ 4.5
A1 > 4.5, ≤ 5.5
A2 > 5.5, ≤ 6.5
A3 > 6.5, ≤ 7.5
Baa1 > 7.5, ≤ 8.5
Baa2 > 8.5, ≤ 9.5
Baa3 > 9.5, ≤ 10.5
Ba1 > 10.5, ≤ 11.5
Ba2 > 11.5, ≤ 12.5
Ba3 > 12.5, ≤ 13.5
Below Ba3 > 13.5
Moody’s Higher Education Outlook- December 2018
2019 outlook remains negative with continued low net
tuition growth
• Revenue will be constrained, low tuition revenue growth remains the
most difficult business condition
– Constrained by weak net tuition growth of 1%-3.5%
– 2018 Annual Tuition Survey- public institutions will have the lowest median net
tuition revenue growth in a decade at 1.5%
• Competitive landscape and emphasis on affordability will constrain
net tuition revenue growth
• State support to remain generally stable, with federal research
environment improving
– Anticipating moderate growth for public institutions of 2.5%-3%
19-Feb-1938
Moody’s US Higher Education Outlook – December 2018
• Sector will remain focused on expense containment, providing
longer term challenges related to programmatic and capital
investment
– 3% proxy for inflation
• Sector is adaptable and most universities are adjusting to systemic
changes
– Overall flat number of high school graduates, with declining is some states
– Declining numbers of transfer students, reflecting reduced community college
enrollments
– Some reduction in international students
• Solid financial reserves add a stabilizing element
19-Feb-1939
Overall review and future impacts
• Ensure sustainable financial environment
– Eastern’s market position, enrollment, and financial pressures
closely track the sector outlook
• Key financial drivers, future planning, and impacts
– Overall enrollment trajectory
– Restructure/resize institution
– Tuition revenue
– Other student fee related revenue tied to enrollment
– State funding and tuition policy
– Fundraising
– Cost containment
– Institutional gift aid
– Strategic investments to position for the future
19-Feb-1940
41
42
APPENDIX
Additional Selected
Information
EWU Peers- as established for strategic enrollment
planning process
• Arkansas State University- main
campus
• Central Connecticut State University
• Idaho State University
• Louisiana Tech University
• Murray State University
• Southeast Missouri State University
• Southeastern Louisiana University
• Southern Connecticut State University
• University of Montana
• University of Tennessee-Chattanooga
• University of Central Arkansas
• University of Idaho
• University of Minnesota- Duluth
• University of Northern Colorado
• University of Northern Iowa
• University of Southern Mississippi
• University of Northern Colorado
• University of Northern Iowa
• University of Southern Mississippi
• Western Illinois University
• Western Kentucky University
• Youngstown State University
• Central Washington University
• Western Washington University
43