finals-credit transactions (2012-13) idol l. bondoc

Upload: idolbondoc

Post on 03-Apr-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    1/9

    1

    IDOL L. BONDOC

    SR NO. 11-64318

    Finals Examination in Credit Transactions

    2nd Semester SY 2012-2013

    Atty. Edwin P. Sulit

    [email protected]

    PROFESSOR

    (100 points)

    QUESTION:

    XYZ Company, a pre-need corporation engaged in the sale of educational plans

    defaulted in the payment of its obligations to holders of maturing educational plansin January 2011. A week later, said company closed its main office and all of itsbranch offices. Upon investigation conducted by the Senate, the following were

    brought to light:

    The policies and marketing plans of the company were conceived and

    implemented by the board of Directors consisting of a chairman and 7 members ofthe board and by its officers consisting of the president, 4 vice-presidents,

    treasurer, board secretary and branch managers in 12 branch offices.

    Of the 130,000 educational plans (Plan A and B combined) sold by the company,45,000 have already matured but remain unpaid. 20,000 of the educational plans

    sold are Type B and the sale of the same was done by the company without thecompany having secured authority from the Insurance Commission and the SEC to

    sell the same.

    The known assets of the company and its officials are as follows:

    A.Land and Building in Makati worth 250 Million;B.Beach resort in Bataan worth 50 Million in the name of the companys

    chairman of the board but the funds used in the acquisition thereof all came

    from the company.

    C.Trust fund in ABC Bank in the amount of P600,000.00;D.Bank deposits in ABC Bank in the amount of P10 Million;E.

    Office equipment worth 20 Million;

    F. Company motor vehicles worth 30 Million;G.Unpaid subscriptions in shares of stock of XYZ Corporation worth P100

    Million.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    2/9

    2

    The company owes the following;

    a. 130,000 plan holders, the aggregate value of the plans being P2 Billion Pesos;b. The City of Makati, 15 Million in unpaid realty and business taxes;c. PLDT, 300,000 in unpaid telephone bills;d. ABC Bank, 100 Million loan secured by mortgage on land and building in

    Makati;

    e. 100 employees, 10 million in unpaid salary, 13 th month pay, holiday pay andseparation benefits;

    f. SSS, 5 Million in unremitted contributions for the employees;g. BIR, 300 Million for unpaid VAT, documentary and income taxes;h. Maynilad, 150,000 for unpaid water bills;i. CCC Construction Corporation, 50 Million unpaid balance for the building in

    Makati constructed by the said corporation;

    j. Mr. Mercado, 30 Million balance of the purchase price of the beach resort. Mr.Mercado is the unpaid vendor;

    k. JMA Properties, Inc., 35 million rentals in arrears for the branch offices ofXYZ Corporation. JMA Properties, Inc. is the owner of the land leased by

    XYZ Corporation for its branch offices;

    l. LG Bank, 25 Million motor vehicle loan for all the motor vehicles of XYZCorporation. All the motor vehicles have chattel mortgages in favor of LG

    Bank; and

    m.Barako Law Office, 25 Million for unpaid attorneys fees.All the officials of XYZ Corporation went into hiding.

    5 plan holders with Type B educational plans sued the officials of theCorporation for Syndicated Estafa and Violation of the Pre-Need Law and

    Violation of the Revised Securities Act. After preliminary investigation,information for said offenses were filed with the Regional Trial Court of Makati

    against all the officials of the corporation and warrants of arrest were issued fortheir apprehension. Only the President of the Corporation was arrested and

    arraigned.

    The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) filed suit to freeze all theassets of the corporation and its officials with the Regional Trial Court of Makati.

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    3/9

    3

    The Court issued a freeze order. None of the officials of XYZ Corporation filed

    any answer or opposition to the AMLC suit.

    Discuss the rights of the respective claimants to the assets of XYZ

    Corporation and the respective feasible legal remedies that may be

    undertaken by them.

    ANSWER:

    A.The rights of the respective claimants to the assets of XYZ Corporation:Based on factual data, the total Assets of XYZ Corporation is valued at Php

    460,600,000.00 and the total liabilities is approximately Php 2,595,450,000.00

    which is only 18% based on assets.

    As such, the rights of the respective claimants to the assets of XYZCorporation will fall under the order of preference of credits under the Civil Code

    of the Philippines. It is stated under the law that it classifies credits into three

    general categories which is

    (1)Special preferred credits listed in Article 2241 and 2242;Art. 2241. With reference to specific movable property of the debtor, the following claims

    or liens shall be preferred:

    (1)Duties, taxes and fees due thereon to the State or any subdivision thereof;(2)Claims arising from misappropriation, breach of trust, or malfeasance by public officials

    committed in the performance of their duties, on the movables, money or securities

    obtained by them;

    (3)Claims for the unpaid price of movables sold, on said movables, so long as they are inthe possession of the debtor, up to the value of the same; and if the movable has been

    resold by the debtor and the price is still unpaid, the lien may be enforced on the price;

    this right is not lost by the immobilization of the thing by destination, provided it has notlost its form, substance and identity; neither is the right lost by the sale of the thing

    together with other property for a lump sum, when the price thereof can be determined

    proportionally;

    (4)Credits guaranteed with a pledge so long as the things pledged are in the hands of thecreditor, or those guaranteed by a chattel mortgage, upon the things pledged or

    mortgaged, up to the value thereof;

    (5)Credits for the making, repair, safekeeping or preservation of personal property, on themovable thus made, repaired, kept or possessed;

    (6)Claims for laborers' wages, on the goods manufactured or the work done;(7)For expenses of salvage, upon the goods salvaged;

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    4/9

    4

    (8)Credits between the landlord and the tenant, arising from the contract of tenancy onshares, on the share of each in the fruits or harvest;

    (9)Credits for transportation, upon the goods carried, for the price of the contract andincidental expenses, until their delivery and for thirty days thereafter;

    (10) Credits for lodging and supplies usually furnished to travellers by hotel keepers,on the movables belonging to the guest as long as such movables are in the hotel, but not

    for money loaned to the guests;

    (11) Credits for seeds and expenses for cultivation and harvest advanced to the debtor,upon the fruits harvested;

    (12) Credits for rent for one year, upon the personal property of the lessee existing onthe immovable leased and on the fruits of the same, but not on money or instruments ofcredit;

    (13) Claims in favor of the depositor if the depositary has wrongfully sold the thingdeposited, upon the price of the sale.

    In the foregoing cases, if the movables to which the lien or preference attaches have beenwrongfully taken, the creditor may demand them from any possessor, within thirty days

    from the unlawful seizure. (1922a)

    Art. 2242.With reference to specific immovable property and real rights of the debtor, the

    following claims, mortgages and liens shall be preferred, and shall constitute an

    encumbrance on the immovable or real right:

    (1)Taxes due upon the land or building;(2)For the unpaid price of real property sold, upon the immovable sold;(3)Claims of laborers, masons, mechanics and other workmen, as well as of architects,

    engineers and contractors, engaged in the construction, reconstruction or repair of

    buildings, canals or other works, upon said buildings, canals or other works;

    (4)Claims of furnishers of materials used in the construction, reconstruction, or repair ofbuildings, canals or other works, upon said buildings, canals or other works;

    (5)Mortgage credits recorded in the Registry of Property, upon the real estate mortgaged;(6)Expenses for the preservation or improvement of real property when the law authorizes

    reimbursement, upon the immovable preserved or improved;

    (7)Credits annotated in the Registry of Property, in virtue of a judicial order, by attachmentsor executions, upon the property affected, and only as to later credits;

    (8)Claims of co-heirs for warranty in the partition of an immovable among them, upon thereal property thus divided;

    (9)Claims of donors or real property for pecuniary charges or other conditions imposedupon the donee, upon the immovable donated;

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    5/9

    5

    (10) Credits of insurers, upon the property insured, for the insurance premium for twoyears. (1923a)

    (2)Ordinary preferred credits listed in Article 2244; andArt. 2244.With reference to other property, real and personal, of the debtor, the following

    claims or credits shall be preferred in the order named:

    (1)Proper funeral expenses for the debtor, or children under his or her parental authoritywho have no property of their own, when approved by the court;

    (2)Credits for services rendered the insolvent by employees, laborers, or household helpersfor one year preceding the commencement of the proceedings in insolvency;

    (3)Expenses during the last illness of the debtor or of his or her spouse and children underhis or her parental authority, if they have no property of their own;

    (4)Compensation due the laborers or their dependents under laws providing for indemnityfor damages in cases of labor accident, or illness resulting from the nature of the

    employment;

    (5)Credits and advancements made to the debtor for support of himself or herself, andfamily, during the last year preceding the insolvency;

    (6)Support during the insolvency proceedings, and for three months thereafter;(7)Fines and civil indemnification arising from a criminal offense;(8)Legal expenses, and expenses incurred in the administration of the insolvent's estate for

    the common interest of the creditors, when properly authorized and approved by the

    court;

    (9)Taxes and assessments due the national government, other than those mentioned inArticles 2241, No. 1, and 2242, No. 1;

    (10) Taxes and assessments due any province, other than those referred to in Articles2241, No. 1, and 2242, No. 1;

    (11) Taxes and assessments due any city or municipality, other than those indicated inArticles 2241, No. 1, and 2242, No. 1;

    (12) Damages for death or personal injuries caused by a quasi-delict;(13) Gifts due to public and private institutions of charity or beneficence;(14) Credits which, without special privilege, appear in (a) a public instrument; or (b)

    in a final judgment, if they have been the subject of litigation. These credits shall have

    preference among themselves in the order of priority of the dates of the instruments and

    of the judgments, respectively. (1924a)

    (3)Common credits under Article 2245.Art. 2245.Credits of any other kind or class, or by any other right or title not comprised inthe four preceding articles, shall enjoy no preference. (1925)

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    6/9

    6

    (4)ORDER OF PREFERENCE OF CREDITSArt. 2246. Those credits which enjoy preference with respect to specific movables, exclude

    all others to the extent of the value of the personal property to which the preference refers.

    Art. 2247. If there are two or more credits with respect to the same specific movableproperty, they shall be satisfied pro rata, after the payment of duties, taxes and fees due the

    State or any subdivision thereof. (1926a)

    Art. 2248. Those credits which enjoy preference in relation to specific real property or

    real rights, exclude all others to the extent of the value of the immovable or real right towhich the preference refers.

    Art. 2249.If there are two or more credits with respect to the same specific real property

    or real rights, they shall be satisfied pro rata, after the payment of the taxes and

    assessments upon the immovable property or real right. (1927a)

    Art. 2250.The excess, if any, after the payment of the credits which enjoy preference with

    respect to specific property, real or personal, shall be added to the free property which the

    debtor may have, for the payment of the other credits. (1928a)

    Art. 2251. Those credits which do not enjoy any preference with respect to specific

    property, and those which enjoy preference, as to the amount not paid, shall be satisfiedaccording to the following rules:

    (1) In the order established in Article 2244;

    (2) Common credits referred to in Article 2245 shall be paid pro rata regardless of dates.(1929a)

    Likewise in Article 2241 and 2242 do not give the order of preference or

    priority of payment. They merely enumerate the credits which enjoy preferencewith respect to specific movables or immovable. With respect to the same specific

    movable or immovable, creditors, with the exception of the State, merely concur.There is no preference among them, there is only concurrence.

    However, in Article 2244 not only enumerates the ordinary preferred credits

    with respect to other property, real and personal, of the debtor, but also gives theirorder of preference in the order named.

    B.Reference to the respective feasible legal remedies:a) The other educational plan holders composed of Plan A and B Combine

    (129,995) should also file an amended Syndicated Estafa and Violation of the

    Pre-Need Law and Violation of the Revised Securities Act against XYZ

    Corporation so that they can really assert their right to claim;

    b) The City of Makati which has a claimed of 15 Million pesos of unpaid realtyand business taxes can foreclosed the property and proceed with proper

    auction;

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    7/9

    7

    c) For PLDT and Maynilad who has 300,000 pesos and 150,000 pesos claimrespectively they should stop and cut their services to XYZ Corporation andfile Civil Case for Collection of Sum of Money;

    d) Officials of ABC Bank with a 100 Million loan secured by mortgage on landand building in Makati that they should review and ensure that said mortgage

    is registered and fully annotated in the land title in the Registry of Deeds toprotect their claim and to file a separate Civil Case forSpecific Performance

    of Contract plus Damages;

    e) To ascertained the rights of the 100 employees unpaid salary, 13th Month pay,holiday pay and separation benefits worth 10 Million pesos should file a case

    to DOLE NCR against the employer, XYZ Corporation and in accordance

    with Article 110 of Department of Labor and Employment Standards;

    f) The Social Security System should also file a Civil Case for Collection ofSum of Money worth 5 Million pesos unremitted SSS contributions for the

    employees;

    g) CCC Construction Corporation with a 50 Million unpaid balance for thebuilding in Makati and JMA properties Inc, with a 35 Million unpaid rentalsin arrears, they should also file a Civil Case for Specific Performance of

    Contract plus Damages;

    h) Mr. Mercado, 30 Million balance of the purchase price of the beach resortcould ask for rescission for breach of contract and could file an Action for

    Reconveyance to Mr. Mercado as the rightful owner of the beach resort;

    i) LG Bank with 25 Million motor vehicle loan for all the motor vehicles ofXYZ Corporation should also rescind the contract of sale and recover by

    actual possession or ask for forclosure of chattel mortgage or ask forspecific performance with damages of all the vehicles for the bank

    disposition;

    j) Barako Law Office should cancel its representation to all the court which theyrepresent XYZ Corporation as counsel because they will have difficulty

    defending the Corporation because of shortage of fund or no funds at all to beprovided by Company. Also, they should settle with their client amicably the

    25 million unpaid attorneys fees otherwise if no settlement arrived, they canfile a Civil Case for specific performance of contract with damages;

    k) BIR can file tax evasion case worth 300 Million pesos against XYZCorporation in violation of unpaid VAT, documentary and income taxes;

    All of these legal remedies by different claimant must also file a notice innotifying the RTC and the Anti-Money Laundering of their individual claim

    against XYZ Corporation for possible consolidation of cases;

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    8/9

    8

    Discuss likewise the effect, if any, of the suit of the AMLC relative to the

    rights of the claimants.

    The suit filed by the Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC) to freeze all

    the assets of XYZ Corporation is valid underRepublic Act No. 10167, Section 01and Section 02.

    Thus in Section 2, Section 11 of the same act was amended to wit that AMLC mayinquire into or examine any particular deposit or investment, including related accounts,

    with any banking institution or non-bank financial institution upon order of any

    competent court based on an ex parte application in cases of violations of this Act, when

    it has been established that there is probable cause that the deposits or investments,including related accounts involved, are related to an unlawful activity as defined in

    Section 3(i) hereof or a money laundering offense under Section 4 hereof.

    Now therefore, the possible effect of AMLC filing suit relative to the rightsof the claimants is that the Anti-Money Laundering Council may have the better

    rights against the other claimants which specifically states underRepublic Act

    No 9160, Section 12 Forfeiture Provisions classifies (a) civil forfeiture, (b) claim

    of forfeited assets and (c) payment in lieu of forfeiture procedure.

    Sec. 12 Forfeiture Provisions.

    (a)Civil Forfeiture. When there is a covered transaction report made, and the court has,in a petition filed for the purpose ordered seizure of any monetary instrument or

    property, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, related to said report, the RevisedRules of Court on civil forfeiture shall apply.

    (b)Claim on Forfeited Assets. Where the court has issued an order of forfeiture of themonetary instrument or property in a criminal prosecution for any money laundering

    offense defined under Section 4 of this Act, the offender or any other person claimingan interest therein may apply, by verified petition, for a declaration that the same

    legitimately belongs to him and segregation or exclusion of the monetary instrument

    belongs to him and for segregation or exclusion of the monetary instrumentcorresponding thereto. The verified petition shall be filed with the court which

    rendered the judgment of conviction and order of forfeiture, within fifteen (15) days

    from the date of the order of forfeiture,, in default of which the said order shallbecome final and executor. This provision shall apply in both civil and criminalforfeiture.

    (c)Payment in Lieu of Forfeiture. Where the court has issued an order of forfeiture ofthe monetary instrument or property subject of a money laundering offense definedunder Section 4, and said order cannot be enforced because any particular monetary

    instrument or property cannot, with due diligence, be located, or it has been

    substantially altered, destroyed, diminished in value or otherwise rendered worthlessby any act or omission,, directly or indirectly, attributable to the offender, or it has

    been concealed, removed, converted or otherwise transferred to prevent the same

    from being found or to avoid forfeiture thereof, or it is located outside the Philippinesor has been placed or brought outside the jurisdiction of the court, or it has beencommingled with other monetary instruments or property belonging to either the

    offender himself or a third person or entity, thereby rendering the same difficult to

    identify or be segregated for purposes of forfeiture, the court may, instead ofenforcing the order of forfeiture of the monetary instrument or property or part

    thereof or interest therein, accordingly order the convicted offender to pay an amount

  • 7/28/2019 FINALS-Credit Transactions (2012-13) Idol L. Bondoc

    9/9

    9

    equal to the value of said monetary instrument or property. This provision shall apply

    in both civil and criminal forfeiture.

    Therefore, the other claimants after AMLC will fall underSection 17, RA9160 provides Restitution which states that restitution for any aggrieved party

    shall be governed by the provisions of the New Civil Code of the Philippines.

    Thus, the Civil Code states the order of preference under special preferredcredits, ordinary preferred credits and common credits Article 2241, 2242, 2244

    and 2245 respectively. And order of preference of credits under articles 2246 to2251.