final rpt on a kimberlite explo programme chapleau …
TRANSCRIPT
PRODUCING MINES
1 Canadian Johns-Manville Co, Ltd. Reeves mine (Ob 9b}...... asb2 Noranda hxploration Co. Ltd./New JoburKe Explorations Ltd.
New Jobufke mine (Ob 9d).. ... ,..... ,..... ... .., ,., ... ,.,. Au
PAST PRODUCING MINES
3 Halcrow-Swayze mine J Os 'Oaj.,4 Jerome mine (Ob 1Gb)...............................,5 Renabie mine (Na 9c).
6 Smith-Thorne mine/Tionaga mine (Ob I3a)....,..,.,..
THE MAP INDEX
Thrj red lcitors and numbers in the horders provide a location reference system based on that of Map 2310, Ontario Mineral Map, 1974.
MINERAL PRODUCTION AND RESOURCES
The area contains deposits of antimony, apatite, asbestos, barite, copper, gold, iron, lead, molybdenum, niobium and other rare earths, talc, thori jm, uranium, and zinc. Production at the end of 1970 was solely of asbestos, bul by 1973 gold was being produced at the New Joburke Explorations Ltd. property by Noranda Exploration Co. Ltd.
Early exploration included work on the Woman River iron formation in 1910. By the 1960's Stackpool Mining Company Limited indicated reserves o' 5,100,000 Ions of iron ore grading 40^ iron and Kukatush Mining Corporation (Ontario) Limited indicated reserves of 158,000,000 tons of ST.8% acid soluble iron in the Radio Hill iron formation in Penhorwood Township.
The Renabie mine in Leeson Township produced 776,191 oz. Au, 245,146 oz. Ag ovor the period 1947 to July, ",970. Reserves as of 1970 were 157,704 tons grading 0.211 oz./tcn Au. The Jerome mine of Jerome Gold Mines Limited in Osway Township produced 56,973oz. Au and 15,'04oz, Ag between 1941 end 1943. In 1968 when production started at the Canadian Johns-Manville Company Limited, Rcevos mine ore reserves were established at 20,000,OCO tons with an asbestos fibre content of 3 to
Dominion Gulf Company holds claims covering the Nemegosenda Lake carbonatite-alkalic complex, which contains a mineralized zone of 20,000,000 tons grading G.47% Nb20s, By-product production of U, Th, rare earths, zirconium, apatite and magnetite would be possible upon development.
Multi-Minerals Limited holds ground on the lackner Lake carbonatite-alkalic complex, which has three mineralized zones grading as follows: zones No. 3 anci 4-37,000,000 tons of D.198% NbaOs, M .3% a patite and 13.77^ magnetite; zone 6 - 5,02-1,250 tors grading 69.6^ rmgr.elile, 21.9^ apatite and Q.173% NbaO;,; and zone 8 - 80,000,000 tons grading Q.25% Nb2Os.
Several base metal occurrences ere known. The Consolidated Shunsby Mines Limited deposit in Cunningham Township com prises a mineralised zone of 310,095 tons grading T.2% Cu, and 1.3?SZn.
Ailimns MapIMSR S HnarRt-Kariuskasinn Sheet
^.w x
Lake f l PUSKUTA i\
Nf ' E L
MONTCALM E'f
\ 69 LERWICK
Lougheed^ Lakes--——;
7a
Shiners-"?Lake1 ' Shiner!!. J•tr'A^r*—-MafMrf., .a^fl.^....,,..,——4XT^lsvV'^ ^*fc
j1 J . \ "yv ^ o a,aai rr.iyri'.id ; , w-r^ \ ST^X X/^ 5' BARcUte^"v / ^ X a\ BARCLA^cT^,.y^ ,^/ \ ,,f^r^5 if
\V s*\\i V ..^ \Reftbie T S
J J/^
COLLISHAW
GEOLOGICAL RELIABILITY DIAGRAM
A DelailBU rrisppiny, sualas grealer than I" to '/l mileB Sfimt-dRtailrd mapping; r,r.nlpR le^i than 1"' to l mileC Mostly unmepped, but some airborne reconnaissance
JEFFR&"——~
Map 2221Chapleau-FoleyetGeological Compilation Series
HOW TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Published geological maps used as reference material during the preparaiiOT of this map are indicated on Index Maps 2079. 2080 and 2081 of the Division of Mines, Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto and on Index Sheets 41 and 42. Geological Survey of Canada. Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.
Four uncoloured preliminary geological maps at scale of one inch to two miles were produced following Operation Chapleau, a helicopter supported reconnaissance mapping project covering the nap sheet. These are: P.B72 Missinaibi Lake Sheet, P.673 Horwood Lake Sheet, P.674 Chapleau Shoe! and P.7fi5 Opeepees- way-Rocky Island Lakes Sheet.
Published geological reports covering this sheet are listed in Bulletin 26 and Supplements, Division of Mines, Ministry of Natural Resources and in the Index of Publications, Geological Survey o! Canada.
Aeromagnetic maps covering this sheet may be obtained from the Director, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, or Mines Publications OfficG, Ministry of Natural Rescjrces, Parliament Buildings, Toronto M7A 1W3.
Topographic mops of the area are available aL a scale nf one inch to two miles, 1:250,000 and 1:50,000 from the Lands Publications Office, Mhistry of Natural Resources and the Topographic Survey, Department of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.
Air photographs at a scalu of one inch to one quarter mile are available from: Photo Library, Administrative Services Branch, Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto. Air photographs at a scale of one inch to ore mile are available from National Air Photo graphic Library, Department of Enercy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa.
The name and ownership of many mineral occurrence on ihis sheet are given on Map 2310, Ontario Mineral Map, 1974.
Information on geology and mineral occurrences may be obtained al the offices of the Regional Geologisfs at Timmins and Sault Ste. Marie and al Lhe office of the Resident Geologist in Sudbury.
Mining claim maps and general information on properties may be obtained at the offices of the Min.ng Recorders at Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie and SLdbjry or at the Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto.
Up-tc-date information on currenl developments may he obtained from the annual review of the Division ol Mines and the Annual Report of Regional and Resident Geologists at Timmins, Sault Ste. Marie and Sudbury, published annually.
LEGEND
PHANEROZOIC
CENOZOIC
QUATERNARY
PLEISTOCENE AND RECENT Ti!l, day, sand, gravel.
UNCONFORMITY
MESOZOIC
LATE JURASSIC TO EARLY CRETACEOUS*
J? lamprophyre dikes.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
PRECAMBRIAN
LATE PRECAMBRIAN
MAFIC TO INTERMEDIATE INTRUSIVE ROCKS*
J ia Hornblende syenite.11b Syenodiorite and diorite.He Hornblende monzonite.lid Porphyritic hornblende diorite,
quartz diorite, and gabbro (plagio clase porphyry).
ne Malic hornfels.
CARBONATITE-ALKALIC COMPLEXES6
Wa Alkalic syenite, pulaskite.JQb Brecciated alkalic syenite anri re
lated rock types.lOc Fenitized rocks.lOd Massive mafic nepheline syenite
(malignite).lOe Massive to foliated nepheline sye
nite and related rocks,Wf Sovite (caidtc-rich carbonatite).10g Magnetite-apatite rock.IQri Urtite, ijolite, melteigite (nepheline-
pyroxene rocks).INTRUSIVE CONTACT
EARLY TO MIDDLE PRECAMBRIAN
MAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS
9 Diabase dikes.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
EARLY P RECAMBRIAN
SHAWMERE ANORTHOSITE COMPLEX
8a Anorthosite lo gabbroic anortnosite.8b Anorthosi'e gabbro.8c Gabbro.8d Brecciated anorthosite lo gabbroic
rocks. Se Gneissic lo ftaser-texfured tons/its
and monzonite.
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
KAPUSKASING STRUCTURAL ZONE ROCKS
7s Meia-igneouK rncKs (metamof-ohosed mafic to intermediate intru sive rocks).
7b Melanocratic granulite (pyroxene-quartz-hornbiende-plagiccfasegranulite),
7c Pelitic and psammitic granuli/es(riyroxene-garnet-quartz-fetdspargranulite),
7d Metasedimentary gneiss, includingintercalations of metavolcanicgneiss (metamorphosed !o uppciamphibolite facies),
7e Arkosic metasedimenls.FAULT CONTACT
FELSIC IGNEOUS AND METAMORPHIC ROCKSC
Felsic Intrusive and Hybrid Rocksc5 Unsubcfivided.d6a Massive to weekly foliated, biotite
and hornblende trondhjemite, gran odiorite, and minor quarlt (fiorite.
6h Gneissic, biotite and hornblendetrondhjemite, granodiorite, and mi nor quartz diorite,
6c Massive to weakly foliated, horn blende and biotite quartz-mon zo nite.
Sd Gneissic biotite and hornblendequar 1 1 -monzonite.
6e Syenitic rocks. 6f Pegmatite, aptite. Sg Augen gneiss. Sh Hornblende granodiorite lo diorite
(In part hybrid rocks). 6/ Porphyritic granitic loci's.
INTRUSIVE OR GRADATIONAL CONTACT
Migmatilic Rocksc5 UnsuMivided.dHa Migmatite with rnetavolcanic paleo-
cf quartz-feldspar -horn blende gneiss; veined with more than 25^ granitic material (neo- somef).
Sb Migmatite with metaseciimeritttry paleosome^ of biotite-quartz-feld- spar gneiss; veined with more than ?5X g ranitic, material (neosomef).
INTRUSIVE CONTACT
MAFIC AND ULTRAMAFIC INTRUSIVE ROCKS
4 Unsubdivided**- 4a Diorite and gabbro. 4b Ultramafic rocks and their serpent-
inized equivalents, minor gabbro.INTRUSIVE CONTACT
METASEDIMENTSff
3 Unsubdividedd-3a Gieywacke, arkose, quartzite.Sh Conglomerate.3c Argillaceous, fine-grained metased-
iments. 3d Biotite-Quarlz-fe/dspar schist and
sneiss. 3e Migmstized metasediment* (W-
P'5% granitic material).
METAVOLCANICSP
Telsic to Intermediate Metavolcanics2 Unsubdividedd-?a Rhyolite to dacite Hows and frag
mental rocks.Sb Tuff, banded tuff, and lapilli-tuff.2c Agglomerate, breccia.2d Porphyritic flows, quartz-feldspar
porphyry,
Mafic to Intermediate Metavolcanics
la Basalt to andesite flows end por phyritic flows, massive to foliated.
Ib Basalt to andesite pillow lava.le Mafic pyroclastic rocks,1d Layered amphibolite.Je D iorite, gabbro (coarse-grained
flows or intrusions).1g Migmstiied mafic metavolcanics
(ID-25% granitic material).
IF Ircn formation (associated with 1, P and 3 map units).
S Sulphide mineralization.
3Based on correlation with radiometricali/ dated lam- prophyres at Cora! Rapids on the Abitibi River.
^Relative ages unknown, radiometric ages equivalent; these rock map units appear to be spatially associated with the KzcuskasinQ Structural Zone.
cUnits 5 and 6 distinguished in part en the basis of aeromagnetic data: therefore, outcrops of unit 5 will occur in areas of unit 6 and vice versa.
dRoch identification based on airborne observation.
eMeJanocratic portions of migmatite, consisting of fragments arid inclusions of country rock.
^Leucocratic portion of migmatite.
SAge relationships bclwccn units 1, 2 and3 unknown.
The letter "C" preceding a rock unit number, for example "GJ", indicates interpretation is based upon geophysical data only.
The letter "D" preceding a rock unit number, for example "DI", indicates idenli!icalian from diamond drill core. i
Scale, l inch to 2M miles
N.T.S. reference 410,42 l
S YM BOLS
Geological boundary.
Synclinal a r/'s.
Anticlinal axis.
Fault.
Lineament.
Altitude in feet above mean sea level.
Railway, with station or f/agstop.
Provincial highway.
Other road.
Aircraft landing facilities.
Larger community.
Smaller community.
Producing mine.
Pas! producing mine.
Mineral occurrence.
Mining Division with boundary.
District boundary.
Township boundary, meridian or base line, surveyed.
Township boundary, un-juivcyerl.
Line ot section.
MAP COMPILATION SOURCES
Geology and revised compilation by P.C. Thurston. R.P. Sage and G.M. Siragusa, and assistants. Geological Branch 1970. 1971 and 1974. Original compilation by H.D. Carlson, Resident Geol ogist, Timmins and J.F. Donovan, 1965.
Geology from published maps and assessment /iles of the Division of Mines, Ministry ol Natural Resources; published maps o! the Geological Survey of Canada and unpublished maps of mining companies.
Cattoyraphy by D.W. Robot-on and assistants, Surveys and Mapping Branch, 1975.
Map base compiled from maps ol the Forest Resources inventory, and the Provincial Topographic Series, sheets 4SBJNW, 42BfSW, 428ISE, Division of Lands, Ministry of Natural Resources, with additional in formation from the staff of the Ministry of Natural Resources.
METAL AND MINERAL
Ag.. ap... As... asb.. Au., ba... herh, Bi... Cu..
gf.'!!Mo
REFERENCE
.Silver
.Apatite
. Arsenic
. Asbestos
.Gold.Barite. Berthierite.Bismuth
. Copper
. Iron
.Graphite
. Molybdenum
mo. . ....jNb......,./Ni..,...,./Pb....... . tfl.........tRA ;
RE...... jSb..,..,..,Th.,....,jT\........-,U....,....[Zn.,.,....;
Molybdenite
NickelLeadQuartzRadioactive mineralsRare EarthsAntimony
ThoriumTitaniumUraniumZinc
Zr. ... .Zircon/am
ONTARIO
DIVISION OF MINES
HONOURABLE LEO BERNIER, Minister of Natural ResourcesDR. J. K. REYNOLDS. Deputy Minister ot Natural Resources
G A Jewett. Executive Director Division of Mines E G. Pye D irector. Geological Branch
Map 2221
CHAPLEAU - FOLEYETGeological Compilation Series
ALGOMA, COCHRANE AND SUDBURY DISTRICTS
Scale 1:253,440 or l Inch to 4 Miles20
Metres bOOO 20
SECTION A B
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 010
FINAL REPORT ON A
KIMBERLITE EXPLORATION PROGRAMME,
CHAPLEAU AREA, ONTARIO
SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT FOR
ONTARIO PROSPECTORS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
GRANT NUMBER OP92-269 W. KERR GRANT NUMBER OP92-270 G. COHOON
November, 1992
Gary A. Cohoon
William C. Kerr
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
010C
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
2.0 LOCATION, ACCESS, AND TOPOGRAPHY
3.0 PROPERTY
4.0 PREVIOUS WORK
5.0 CURRENT PROGRAM
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
7.0 STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS
8.0 LIST OF REFERENCES
Figure Figure Figure Figure Figure
Appendix l Appendix 2 Appendix 3 Appendix 4
DrawiDrawiDrawiDrawiDrawiDrawi
Map 1Map 2
ngngngngngng
123456
LIST OF FIGURES
Location MapClaim Map, Sherlock Township Claim Map, Lincoln Township Claim Map, Lincoln Township Claim Map, Murdock Township
LIST OF APPENDICES
AgreementMicroprobe Ternary diagrams Microprobe Analytical Data Diamond Drill Log
LIST OF DRAWINGS
Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer Magnetometer
LIST OF MAPS Compilation Map Current Programme Work Areas,
16
17
19
5789
10
Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey, Survey,
Claim Cla i m Cla im Cla im Claim Claim
1181558 1181559 1151235 1151234 1181563 1181562
Sample Sites
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 3
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
Work carried out and funded by the current 1992 OPAP
programme (file numbers OP92-269, OP92-270) commenced with
analytical (microprobe) work at the University of Western
Ontario. This work was carried out on garnets identified from the
previous years OPAP program in order to define the geochemical
classification of the garnets according to Dawson and Stephens,
1975, and Gurney, 1985. Over half of the 24 garnets tested fell
within the G-5 field, while one large angular fragment was
corroborated as G-9. Potentially more significant, however, was
the conclusion that the chrome diopside (two grains tested) was
corroborated as having kimberlitic affiliations.
Following this work, linecutting, ground geophysical
surveying and prospecting were carried out on six of the eight
staked groups. One of the claim groups, P1181559 (Sherlock West)
contained a magnetic feature with a strong kimberlite like
expression and was selected for drill testing. Drilling was
carried out in mid August of 1992, consisting of a 200 foot hole,
and a magnetite rich intermediate intrusive was found to be the
causative source. As this rock type was also found in outcrop
while prospecting at the Sherlock East anomaly, it is probable
that all the anomalies in southwest Sherlock township are related
to this rock type.
Following this diamond drilling phase, further sieve
sampling with a coarser mesh, was carried out at a more detailed
spacing to try and define within tighter limits the indicator
train.- realizing that these targets in Sherlock Twp were 10 miles
up-ice from the train established in 1991. .Examination of the
heavy mineral concentrates after analytical processing was
carried out in the late fall of 1992. It was found that samples
of outwash material (eskers) contained generally the same range
of concentrations of indicators as established the previous year,
while no indicator minerals were found in any of the till
samples.
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 4
In summary, a reconnaissance programme for kimberlite
has culminated in the drill testing of a magnetic diatreme .
Although the source was not kimberlitic, further work is
recommended to isolate within better limits the source of the
indicator minerals, especially the chrome diopsldes. Drill
testing or bulldozer stripping is also recommended on the Lincoln
north claim group.
2.0 LOCATION, ACCESS, AND TOPOGRAPHY
The centre of the area is located 20 kilometres
northeast of the town of Chapleau, in northern Ontario. A number
of highways bisect the area, including hwys 101, 129, and 667,
arid numerous logging roads branch off from these major routes.
Topography is generally low and rolling in the north of
the work area where the more resistant gneissic rocks
predominate. The south part, especially the south boundary, is
overlain by aeolian sands and flat till sheets. Much of the area
has been logged at some time in the past. Sherlock Township is
characterized by both mature and overmature dense jackpine and
spruce stands in a thin till cover interspersed with large
glacial erratics. Much of this township is affected by windfall
and blowdown making passage difficult at best. The immediate
area bordering the Nemegosenda River is second growth, having
been logged in the distant past probably as a source of railroad
ties for the CN line to the north.
See Figure l, on the following page, for location.
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
FIGURE l - LOCATION MAP
PAGE 5
V-' ^^ Ml Maiden y*|N ' 1185' \
j \ KAPUSKASING
v ,\*r,fv,'IV^ j F| X-'-' j^D^FS^ -V^CHKIv j^MI;! .^AHRLIv
'' .''''AA : ,""""""p^ j/A' ( M-oml-,- ^ C i' ^, : [. a
"^^TW . 'A ' 1 5 (-'-1 rrr~3H~A'wonte.T^'J/"" "'"'l " r" 'l ^x '''' /"i ' :' :; ' (--
y f/ ' N-/ ' ( i '" 1 '.'.! " "'* 1*,-'
™.'^l'r PATTINSON.. ^Acouir;.; j
'•Trf-H
.Sg;|yr;l; s j.^/V
\cr(A* ••if-^Vurr*'^' T
; ~ ;^*-\'l397'1358' ,| ^ ' i, ij,, fi AU! l H T\orm 'i '4 "^ HAP1AN (:l'ini l '''"\ . -: ^^^fc^^tv '~~'t l
.'•.' .4 rm-i rt,tf,rivi'••"^^^^u? HUFF. SWAY pj .,,|tiom^'
*,ooo
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
3 . O PROPERTY
PAGE 6
Eight claim groups were staked in late 1991 following
the microscope recognition of the chrome diopside and pyrope
garnet that was found during the 1991 field season. These groups
were staked up-ice of some of the major garnet concentrations.
William C. Kerr of South Porcupine has a 9C^ interest
in 8 claim groups, comprising 32 units, and Gary Cohoon of
Toronto retains a 1C^ interest. A copy of the agreement between
messrs. Kerr and Cohoon may be found in Appendix "l" . The eight
claim groups that have been staked are located in Sherlock,
Murdock, and Lincoln Townships, situated in the Porcupine Mining
Division northeast of Chapleau, Ontario. Table l, below, details
the relevant data pertaining to all the claims subject to this
programme.
TABLE l
CLAIM NUMBER
1181558
1181559
1181561
1151235
1181652
1181560
1181563
1151234
RECORDING DATE
October 18, 1991
October 18, 1991
October 18, 1991
October 18, 1991
October 18, 1991
October 18, 1991
November 6, 1991
October 18, 1991
TOWNSHIP
Sherlock
Sherlock
Sherlock
Sherlock
Murdock
Lincoln
Lincoln
Lincoln
GRID NAME
Sherlock North
Sherlock West
Sherlock N.E.
Sherlock East
Murdock South
Lincoln West
Lincoln East
Lincoln North
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 7
The centre of the work area is located at latitude 48 degrees and
15 minutes, longitude 82 degrees and 58 minutes, and is located
within N.T.S. Reference Number Sheets 410 and 42B.
Figures 2 through 5, on the following four pages, detail the
location of the individual claim groups.
FIGURE 2 - SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP
HERiE
CHAPLEAU-
NEMEGOSENOA
RIVER
PROVINOAL '
PARK SCALE::
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
FIGURE 3 - LINCOLN TOWNSHIP
PAGE 8
l tt
(4 UNITS) '^ - - . J
CHAPLEAU
SCALE: 1 INCH - 40 CHAINS
ACRES HECTARES
rivi-V: fi- " 77" v-^" ;ju f INEMEGOSEIs.-^ ^1^' TOWNSHIP OF
' :: W^;;^:
LIDISTRICT F
SUPBURYMINING DIVISION :
l PORCUPINE ;: '*;;-P:||jl
"r'-'i^-v•-1^•f'* J! j 1.71*
)..'r:., Mt*M :
!?t
4ir?
FTNAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
FIGURE 4 - LINCOLN TOWNSHIP
PAGE 9
rO r-- NEMEGOSE(
Q-J UJU.o:UJ CL CLOo
TOWNSHIP OF f
LINCOisiDISTRICT OF ';i^|
SUDBURY; I|L MINING D IVISION
PORCUPINE
Ministry Of Surveys andNatural Mappino"i:Resources Branch
jjUtkwwl Topog/aphic SWIM
Plan No.
M 989J VI*"^Vi*/^/
1 II&56:(4 UNITS).
- 'V
r".,
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
FIGURE 5 - MURDOCK TOWNSHIP
PAGE 10
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 11
The enclosed Ontario Department of Mines compilation map
number 2221, herein as Map l, details the boundaries of the 1991
work area, the 1992 area, and the staked claims.
4.0 PREVIOUS WORK
Previous work may be found in a report submitted last year
in fulfilment for OPAP grant OP91-091. In essence,
reconnaissance heavy minerals sampling located concentrations of
pyrope garnet (primarily G-5) and chrome diopside in an apparent
glacial train at the north boundary of the survey area. Eight
claim groups totalling 32 units were staked on the basis of l" to
l mile aeromagnetic anomalies that were present up-ice from the
indicator minerals. Four claims were staked in Sherlock
Township, three claims were staked in Lincoln Township, and one
claim was staked in Murdock Township.
No follow-up was carried out in 1991 due to the lateness of the
season, although a bulk sample was collected and processed from
site WK-37.
5.0 CURRENT PROGRAM
Work began with the microprobe analysis of 24 selected
grains of garnet and two grains of chrome diopside, all
identified from the 1991 work program. This work was carried out
at the University of Western Ontario, and results are detailed
in appendices 2 and 3. Of the garnets, over half the grains had
a G-5 affinity, while the rest were of probable metamorphic
origin, except for several grains from sample WK-31 which were G-9 's.
It is interesting that the G~9 grains were composed of fragments
of Larger grains, while all others (observed and/or tested) were
much smaller - this may imply that the sieve size used for sample
collection may have been too small (0.50-1.25 mm).
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 12
Two chrome diopside grains were tested, and the microprobe
results not only confirmed the chrome diopside composition but
established that the diopsides were within the limits of those
diopsides of kimberlitic affinity, according to Reed and
Sinclair, 1991. It was therefore felt that further work to trace
the source of these minerals was justified.
Mobilization to a campsite in central Lincoln Township was
carried out in late May, and linecutting and ground magnetic
surveys were carried out from that camp. The location of all
areas worked this year may be found in Map 2. These surveys were
carried out over six of the eight staked claim groups.
Preliminary ground investigation of the remaining two groups
indicated that magnetic surveying was not warranted based on
geologic evidence.
Essentially on each group a cut and picketed baseline was
put in the approximate centre of the group. Hip chained and
flagged lines were then run off of this baseline and these lines
were used for control for the ground magnetic survey. Base
stations were set up on each grid in order to account for both
the diurnal and instrument drift. On no occasion was the base
station difference more than 40 gammas (nano-teslas) on closing,
which was easily corrected. All linecutting, hip-chaining and
flagging lines, and ground magnetometer work was carried out by
Messrs. Cohoori and Kerr from May 27 to June 13, 1992.
The most promising anomalies were prospected by W. Kerr from
June 19 to June 23. The following details the results of the
magnetic survey.
DWG No l- Sherlock North. Complete coverage was not
possible because of the pond in the centre of the grid, but the
available data has shown that a kimberlite source is unlikely as
the cause of the anomaly. The airborne anomaly was centered on
the lake edge, but ground geophysical data shows that there are
several isolated peaks north and east of the airborne high that
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 13
may have been averaged by the airborne system. No further work
is recommended on this zone.
DWG No 2- Sherlock West. The most significant anomaly was
found on this claim group. This response shows a circular
magnetic feature of about 600 gammas above background, with a
relatively uniform magnetic intensity. The anomaly is within a
topographic low. Prospecting was carried out on this grid, and
no outcrop was found anywhere over the surface expression.
However, shallow dipping gneisses formed a semi-circular cliff on
the north, west, and east boundary of the anomaly. A hand
shovelled pit was attempted over the peak of the magnetometer
anomaly, but was abandoned after 7.5 feet in aeolian sand. Drill
testing was recommended. A geophysical report for assessment
purposes on this claim was filed and accepted in August, 1992.
DWG No 3-Sherlock East A linear throughgoing anomaly of
9,000 gammas above background was located, centered on line 3+00
south at 1+50 east. This location is a pronounced topographic
high. Although the nature of the anomaly discounted a
kimberlitic source, prospecting was carried out over the apex of
the anomaly. A twenty foot long trench was cleared with grubhoe
and shovel at 1+50 east to expose a magnetite bearing
intermediate intrusive. Although the contained magnetite exposed
was not deemed strong enough to be the source of the 9,000 gamma
anomaly, it was in the range to discount this anomaly as having a
kimberlitic source.
DWG No 4 Lincoln North The ground geophysical data
discloses a general northeast trending irregular magnetic feature
of about 400 gammas above background. The centre of the anomaly
is slightly east of the centre of the grid, and looks to be
continuing off the property. This claim was prospected, and
although there was a number of outcrops of shallowly dipping
gniesses, no outcrop was apparent over the main part of the
anomaly. Two shallow pits were attempted, ( at 0+50 W on line 6
north, and at 0+40 west on line 3 north) but both were abandoned
after 3.5 feet in hard compact till. Further work is warranted
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 14
on this grid, but as the nearest water is over one mile away in a
provincial park, drilling was not contemplated this year. Logging
operations were active this year, and it is possible logging
roads will approach the south boundary this winter. Bulldozer-
backhoe work may be a cost-effective method of testing this
anomaly.
DWG No 5-Lincoln South The magnetometer survey discloses a
7,000 gamma point source magnetic anomaly in the north central
part of the grid, part of a 500 metre linear trend. The clearcut
nature of the claim group exposed a number of outcrops in the
area to the extent that the anomaly was prospected while the
survey was being carried out. Thin bands of cherty iron
formation are responsible for the anomaly, and no further work is
warranted.
DWG No 6-Murdock North This survey identified a linear 400
metre long, 100 metre wide east west trending anomaly of maximum
300 gammas above background. The airborne anomaly was a very
weak 10 gamma point source. No outcrop was noticed during the
survey over the anomalous area. It does not exhibit kimberlitic
features, and no further work is recommended on this zone.
5.1 DIAMOND DRILLING
In late August, a 200 foot hole was drilled to test the
anomaly on Sherlock West, Claim 1181559. The drill was collared
at coordinates 1+75 south, line 3+00 west, and drilled north at
55 degrees. (See appendix 4 for drill log and location sketch.)
The cause of the magnetic anomaly was determined to be a
magnetite rich intermediate intrusive, similar to that observed
in the stripping of Sherlock East, and no kimberlite was seen.
5.2 FURTHER SAMPLING
It was then attempted to try and define any indicator
minerals between the staked anomalies in Sherlock Twp and
the north boundary established in the 1991 survey. 15 samples
were taken, composed equally of till and outwash material. This
material was processed at Lakefield Research in Lakefield,
Ontario, using heavy liquid separation techniques. The coarser
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 15
than normal sieve size- 1.25 to 2.75 mm- meant that the mag-
stream separation process could not be used for bulk separation,
and all the sample was processed by heavy liquid methods.
Microscope examination of the residues took place in Timmins.
Results may be found on Map 2. Several conclusions were evident
on completion of this phase of the program;
-where the original material sampled was either esker or outwash,
G-5 type pyrope garnets were found in essentially the same range
of concentrations as found the previous year.
-where till was the sample medium, no indicators were located.
-Virtually no lithic fragments were present in samples from
original outwash material, while the till samples contained up to
7C^ lithics per sample in the coarser size ranges.
-While garnets of all compositions routinely make up to 50^ of
the non-magnetic heavy mineral fraction of original outwash
samples, they generally range to a maximum of only 1(^ in till
samples.
-Till samples are believed to be of local derivation, and may
represent essentially in situ weathering materials rather than
transported materials.
Conclusions from this limited sampling are tenuous given the
complicated glacial history of the area. The lack of garnets in
the till samples is certainly disappointing but may or may not be
significant. However, the lack of chrome diopsides in the till
samples is certainly significant as the indicators found in 1991
apparently have a 10-15 mile range. The nature of the lithic
fragments leads the author to believe that till material has not
been transported a long distance, and the till sample taken may
not represent a large area up-ice. The fact that the indicators
are still present in the outwash material points to a source up-
ice. However, there are large sheets of aeolian sand plains,
which, coupled with the lack of access, would greatly hinder any
follow-up programs that concentrated on surface sampling.
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 16
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the indicator minerals that were identified
by microscope during the 1991 OPAP program were verified by
microprobe analysis early in the current program. No G-10
garnets were identified, although a number of G-5's and G-9's
were corroborated. A number of chrome diopsides with kimberlitic
affinity were corroborated. Linecutting, ground geophysical
work, and prospecting were carried out on 6 claims, and one
diamond drill hole was performed during this programme.
Following this, 15 further sieved samples were taken to try and
define the limits of the indicator train within a smaller area.
When outwash material was sampled it was found that generally
similar concentrations of indicators were found as were found in
the previous years programs. Till samples contained no
indicators. This could be a function of 1) the superior natural
concentrating abilities of eskers and stream riffles, coupled
with the large cachement area sampled by these features, and also
2) extreme near source cachement area of the till. In any
event, further work is warranted to 1) determine the cause of
the airborne and ground magnetic anomaly on claim 1151234, and
collect further samples, if at all possible given the poor
topographic and access conditions, immediately up-ice and east of
Sherlock Township. The presence of the large Shenango Complex
immediately to the northeast may become more significant,
geologically, in light of these results.
. -. Respectfully submitted, this /(,J day of November, 1992
William C. Kerr
Gary A. Cohoon
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 17
CERTIFICATE OF QUALIFICATIONS
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT:
I currently reside at 1010 Michener Boulevard, South Porcupine,
Ontario, PON IKO.
I am a graduate of the University of New Brunswick, Fredericton,
New Brunswick, with a Bachelor of Science degree, major- Geology,
completed 1975.
I have been actively involved in the Canadian mining industry
since 1972 and have been employed full time as a Geologist since
1975.
I am a member of the Prospectors and Developers Association of
Canada, and a Fellow of the Geological Association of Canada.
This report is based upon my own observations while working in
the area during the last five years, and on a study on Ministry
of Northern Development and Mines Assessment records and
published geological maps and reports on the area.
South Porcupine, Ontario
William C. Kerr, B. Se, FGAC November 10, 1992
REPORT QN OPAF PROGRAM PAGE 19
8.0 LIST OP REFERENCES
Atkinson, W.J.
1991: Diamond Exploration Philosophy, Practice, and
Promises: A Review.
Bennett, G., Brown, D.D., George, P.T., and Leahy, E.J.
1967: Operation Kapuskasing; Ontario Department of Mines,
MP 10.
Brown, D.D., Bennett, G., and George, P.T.
1967: The Source of Alluvial Kimberlite Indicator Minerals
in the James Bay Lowland; Ontario Department of Mines,
P 7.
Brummer, J.J.
1978: Diamonds in Canada, Canadian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy bulletin, pp 64-79.
Card, K.D.
1982: Progress Report on Regional Geological Synthesis,
Central Superior Province; in Current Research, Part
A,Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 82-1A.
Dawson, J.B., and Stephens, W.E.
1975: Statistical Classification of Garnets from Kimberlites
and Associated Xenoliths. Journal of Geology, 1975,
Vol. 83, pp 589-607.
Glover, J.E. and Harris, P.G.
1985: Kimberlite Occurrence and Origin: A Basis for
Conceptual Models in Exploration. The University of
Western Australia, Publication No. 8.
Gurney, J.J.,
1985: A Correlation Between Garnets and Diamonds in
Kimberlites. The University of Western Australia,
Publication no. 8.
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 20
Kerr, W. C.,
1992: Summary Report of a Kimberlite Exploration Programme
submitted in fulfilment of a grant from the Ontario
Prospectors Assistance Programme- Grant Number
OP91-094. January 24, 1992,
Kirkley, M.B., Gurney, J.J., and Levinson, A.A.
1992: Age, Origin, and Emplacement of Diamonds: A Review of
Scientific Advances in the Last Decade. Canadian
Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, Volume 84, No 956,
pp48-57
Lee, H.A.
1965: Investigation of Eskers for Mineral Exploration;
Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 65-14
Mitchell, R. H.
1991: Kimberlites and Lamproites: Primary Sources of
Diamond. Geoscience Canada, Volume 18, November 2, pp
1-16.
Percival, J.A.
1985: The Kapuskasing structure in the Kapuskasing-
Fraserdale Area, Ontario; in Current Research,
Part A, Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 85-1A.
Percival, J.A., Green, A.G., and Milkereit, B., Cook, F.A.,
Geis. W., and West, G.F.
1989: Seismic Reflection Profiles Across Deep Continental
Crust Exposed in the Kapuskasing Uplift Structure, in
Nature, Volume 342, No. 6248, pp 416-420.
Reed. L. E., and Sinclair, I.G.
1991: The Search for Kimberlites in the James Bay Lowlands
of Ontario. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical
Bulletin, Volume 84, No 947, pp!32-139.
Satterly, J.
1971: Diamond, USSR and North America, a Target for
Exploration in Ontario; Ontario Department of Mines,
Miscellaneous Paper 48
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM PAGE 21
Thurston, P.C., Siragusa, G.M., and Sage, R.P.
1977: Geology of the Chapleau Area, District of Algoma,
Sudbury, and Cochrane; Ontario Division of Mines,
Geoscience Report 157.
Wolfe, W.J., Lee, H.a., and Hicks, W.D.
1975: Heavy Mineral Indicators in Alluvial and Esker Gravels
of the Moose River Basin, James Bay Lowlands, District
of Cochrane, Ontario Division of Mines, GR 126.
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
APPENDIX l
EXPLOITS EXPLORAliON CORPORATION
.'\\voru~
P.O. BOX 6165 P.M. S.SOUTH PORCUPINE, ONTARIO
TEL. (705) 235-2405 CANADA PON 1KO
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
APPENDIX 2
WESTERN-samples 30 fi), 40 (3)
Asf \
r \N
WESTERN-samples 31 (5)
i.
WESTERN-sarnples 32 (1), 34 (2), 36 (1)
A7
\
777 \
Xftrs
WESTERN-3 ample 37 (5)
7A.
,/
\i7*Ax\
WESTERN- sample 37 (5 also)
MgO
N e p e a n VVK —37 —three samplesduplnatn anal;,tiin
Mg O
Af
A
\\
i———i———i———r i———i———i———r
WESTERN-samples 30 (J), 40 (3
f7}iB
X\
\\
fi\
\A A
i———r "i———i———i———r
OLU
EXPLOITS EXPLORATIONGARNET ANALYSES
16 ————————————————————————————————————
14CO
Q-
O
LUO p,o: o-UJ
6-
o-
•- '7
0 2 4 6 8 10 12WEIGHT PERCENT GAO
EXPLOITS EXPLORATIONGARNET ANALYSES
T MGD
LSf \\
\
i i i r
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
APPENDIX 3
A Vj^
- 10,449 nA
Spec ] TAP Pos-107.210 !O 0,06779-1-7- 0,00055 ( 0.89787 Rel )' ' D- 1.71.62 ( 25416), Bkg- 0,,89 ( 186), P/B- 1.36,300,63X St d dev 20 sec:
3J4 Spec 2 TAP Pos^ 77.355 K^- .18992-i-/- 0.00094 ( 0.93:187 Pel)P-B- 389.27 ( 81350), Bkg^ 3,1.7 ( 068) , P/B^ 121.340.3 5 x Std dev 20 sec
:iN4 Spec 4 I.. I F Pos"146.215 K- 0.00000+7- 7^00000 ( 0.00000 RS ] )c - --0,00 ( -O) , Bkg- 0.17 ( 35), p/B- --0,017-, .9"; at d dev 20 sec
i 13 Spec 3 PET Pos- 88,195 K- 0 .f)001 H-,'- 0,00011 ( 0.00368 Re!)P-H- 0.1.0 ( 21), Bkg- 1.39 C 299), p/B- 0.0?V9.99:; Std dev 20 SBC
•:K--: Spec 4 l... I r- pn--159 ..235 K- 0.00756H-/- 0.00053 ( 0.026^1 Re?1; -'-H- 1.22 ( 256), Bkg- 0,1.6 ( 34), P/B^ 7.46
7..'-: i4",;; 3td dev 26 sec
,,'V: S,.:::.c 3 P El Po-^107.660 K- 0.14910-t-/- 0,,00;ij5 ( 0.86386 Pel) r-;-i~ 136.96 ( 23623), Bkg^ 0..6B ( i4t), P/B-: 202,91
?-.~WZ S td ripv 20 sec :":kg O -f f. X- 5V..9850 Y- 42.3737 /- l 1. .31 630
•'ci 2J 4 T i 3 AI...7 C:R-1 I1N4 FE4 Mfi4 CA3 !9\3 i'-JAJ
7:',F CORRECTION 1.5.00 KV 40.00 Beg I ter :- 2K r Z J LA] f. F] r ZAP.l NHL Atom'X wt^ Norm
7!-K 0 . l l - K '-':
!3P-K oCM-37 0,
.1. i .. i 7 t
(fi ff) f/; ;|
0075
0076c 0000-' 48
087'3-: -'l ,' , -
. -[ 7
0000
•/?02.'
1 768
.1. ,, ':.' .i. Q
1 . 1 6 1:i ,, 0461 . 1 601 .1.941 . 1 c 3l , 0 1 5:i , 050•i. ,03c1 ,C8907775
L ,, y.. C.) ,,i
1 .0-1
l .4:74
:i .02.3'i . 0 1. 2i ,, ?- 1 0
1 ,8061 .0-371 .0511 .9042,603
V..I . i /O
0.9970.9900,9961 ..0007 ,0000,9940,9990,9730.9951. .000
1
1
l
1
1
iiiii,~iii..
. .;,0,.J
.2S6
. 48:7;
. 1 83,308. 1 70". c; 1 9.091. "i 0 r-
.969
.537
v.i ,, v..i ,:. f
0 , 'rt3 4e . 0 1 90,0677; ,,0580 .0670) . e 1 90.078-:0,0220.020----------
.1. 0 ,: f., . ..,
0 , 0 10,,900 .370.00
0.689 ,, 1 98 ,. 8 10 ,00
0,3360.83
,-.. -i- 01O
01
10
1 60
044
, ...-j ,- , 0 J,, 1 2.89.08
27-7-,, 30.'-•'7
,0!7
. 4 1
.BS
..•:. ---!-
01001
i 0i 6
7;0
44
, . .j:"!
. 0 1
, 1. 2A.89. 00274.3071.98,,00, 4 1 A. ^ 7 D,
Total- 99.95
l : : M -: .
' , . . .. .. - '--'' r' '. .iC; AX; 0 AA- ' - . .AAA;A AA? (": .o, '- ' A y,:: s "
i. A3 1 '- 1 .••'/"-••v , o. -A--
0.03V..; -,AA2AA : ; 4 AA 66?
RUN B r: H C OU!..r CPX 14: 6:2628- MAR- 92F i l e : Z A!- CPXBeam- 'L; o, 44 2 nA
KA 3 ::-;pt:c 3 PET Po 5=11 9 .895 hA 0.00004+7- 0 AA004 f 9.00038 Re'1 A--IA::. 0.04 ( 75, 8kg- CA56 ' 118), P 7 B" 0,9699,, 99V -rr! dPV 2! (9 SBC
At. 2 ::r:p t --.::r A : A P Pos^ 90.600 K ~ 0 .00794+7- 0.00016 ( 0,15P89 Rel) A--F- 15.34 ( 320:5), Bkg- ; .12 ( 233), P/K- 13.75
:; r: :--,td dev 2:0 sec
l' F4 Spec 3 l... l! F Po^l.34.785 K^ 0.03494 + 7- 0.00063 ( A A! 0366 Rel)l-'-B^- 3.47 ( 726), Bkg- 0.29 ( 60) , P 7 B- 12.024,.^r:; 3rd dev 20 sec
NA.1 Ape. 2 'TAP Pos-129.425 K- 0.00206+7- 0,00012 i 0,04:121 Kel ) ;'-A- 1.74 ( 364), Bkg- 0,14 ( 30), p/R- 12.0!
A..A6A : ;:A:d r! -/v 20 ;;,-.a,i! - ; - ;:; ,. 4 l 2 nA
JA4 A r ,,v, ; - : j -(/-.p Pos^107.2:i0 K- : 0.06HP9-!-/- 0.000AA ( 0,91250 Re iA--B- 123.60 ( 25738), Rko^ 0.39 ( 185), P7B- 139.030.6 A"; A r. d dev 20 see
A:;-J-! Aper 4 LIP Por-^-lS9 .2W5 K-" 0.00906 + 7- 0.000S--. ' 0,02307A-IA- 1. .31 ( 272), Rkg- 0 ,, 1 6 ( 34.', AAR- 7 ..96
6.7& 1;; ''A:d day 20
,-ipt.^:: 2 'TAP Poi^ 77.355 hA^ 0 . :i 9506 + 7- Z .?i**'^7 : 0.957.1.1 R .399.82 ( 33258), 8kg- 3.19 ( 665), A/R- 12!3ri4
20
i A! 3 :"-:|-,.;v." 3 RA| P C! ~.™ 83 ,, 1 93 K- 0.0A044A/- A AAA i 8 ( .-: ,- 'l 520 Rro'i:'--B- 0 AI-2 i 87), Bkg- 1.38 ( 288), P/B^ 0.30
:.-'9 '; , i ;d ;i(^v 30
rlN-'l A r r - ;i j. r?.. Rev.,: 1 46, 2 16 A- 0 , A ' A/; 6 4 4- /-- i': , 6- : A'// t ^ , . O A 1. 8 j Pr---l::- v .10 ( 22) , Rky- A.6171 ( 3:",; n p .'D- 0. 6?•4,, 0 3 ",: At d dev 20 sec
: . A 3 6 , , . . . , 6 l -' r -] i -- o -, l 0 7 . 6 6 0 K : 0 , i -;- 9 5 4 !- 7 - O , fv :- ' ;'' l i 6 ( -6 , 8 6 ; , : '-: 7 R e ].''•-M-. i';, 6. r;.--, ( 26604 ) ,, O kg~-- ( Mo:-; ( 1.416 ,, l' :'.6; .:- '/f; ; 6.6
F- , •O' OF- J .i:"; hjorrr.:
:,'0- !
; :. r; . \
":,..--|-.
O.A i-:K --KOIA--KX: -l-:
:
:
i;,--
f;i";
t'
0
0)
0
,, i ; X, :
, OOo-:o. -- ' " "'
, .'o : -;0;,, !''005
0X149,,v:,o8-. i 495..0000
.-0021
,, l 7 1 3
:.i
;
1
1
i
1
1
1
0
X- i 'i . i
:.'. ;. . :,
11-\ .-,.-J
•1 '
.1-7-,, - 1 4..009
.079
.036
.970
i.-
:i.i.:i1•i - ;
1•i .,9
.....•••O-;,, '.,' : -'O
-; . . .",
:- . ' ..' ' O'
. ' .,
,. -. ' ! .
, Xi :; 1... -...i ... ;..004 1.003, 8 9 8,635
:':
0f.,', -.
'.
10
0
0
0
1
,, 99X;07 9 "799 7)
07 9 60"i00
.000
.991
.999
.973
.995,, 000
!::.:
;:
111:i•i;.
1
2
,,9;-.0.",206,^ ?
, : , COX1M - -'
.. i 77,, :X 1 3.091. 1 05.959.5 5 R
X:' , 'X '' : ;0.,0C'400- '.X
^ , O 6 00,,X0o0.0620.0190.o:':830.0220,020..................
' 9 ,. ; /,0 . 0."
'- ' i.
vi ,, - ; 0
OoO-; o , o 9 9 , X; 7 S.o;o-0.00
X) . 38
O i , . 0O"i . l 8XooXo•C oXX71 076
j. 0.4 216.320 .000.40
0,
:i 101600
.76 43A 3200
4 MA 8 l DA
Total^ 99395
0.; i do R e si. 1 1 t s
8102'! 102OP203X:R2(J3ri NO
: EOi li'? QOAOo: 21 joiAX'ixTov.a! ^
wt.%53.50
0.09
2 .231. .390 . 0820,26
1 7 . 2822.83
0 , 0 10.54
100.22
Norm w t -i53.380.09
2.221 .390.082. 2 6
1 7 . 2522.78
0 . 0 1
0,34
Mi n en a'l6 Ox y
1. .94030.00240.0951.0.03990 . 00260.06860.93430.88710 n 0003
0.03834.0090
pormul a4 Cat
1 .93600.00240.09490.03990,,00260,06850.93220.88510.0002
0.03825.9S66
.•ON 8x:H!:ojopp CPX i 4:
on*: /AF- CPX Os a m- 10.453 rn-i
K\3 Spec 8 pEO'f Poo-l19.895 K-~ 0 .00000 + 7 - 0,00000 ( 0.00000 Re'!•-'-8-^ -0,03 ( -5), Bkg::::: 0,56 ( 1.1B; n P /B- -0,0499.99"; 3td dev 20
; : .2 Opoo 2 "IAP Po;:-: 90.600 K~ 0,00109 + 7-" 0,00007 ( 0,,02178 Re'!o-B™ 2,,i0 ( 440), Bkg::- 1,12 ( 283), P7B- 1.98o. 8 5 x: St d c! oy 20 sec
••'-4 Sp^r 3 oiP Po:;:.:..: 134.785 K^ 0.01724 + /-- 0.00065 ( 0,oii.967 Re!•-'-B- -i-.01 ( 889), B k g-'- 0-29 ( 60), P/B™ 1.3.38
"0,69";; S lv d clev 20 sec:
o-.. ,:-.r,oc 7 TAP Po ; :::. : :oi29 .425 K- 0.0-193 + X-. 0..00012 ( 0.03958 RfOi••'•••T-. 1,67 ( 350), Bkg^ 0 ,, :i 4 ( 30;,, p/B^ 11.04
O 0790 Old dfcv 30 PPC:0,:Ufi-::: 10.431 f,A
l X'! XOHO-: 1 IAP Pa^'l 07 ,,21 0 !O 0 .07083+7-- 0.^^056 ( 0.938.! 9 :"- : XO'0,0:-;: ( 26512), Birg^ 0,89 ( ioO)., P/3-^ 142., 0 - : :
.-' "l H''-' C .. i 'y:'38^ 2 . l9 '
ft ., 0ft'"'"
667) , l267--:3
•i/-- P ,73ft\", .-.-- 08 ,, j '
167) ,20 s e r
•'. , x .-'084-1- 7-- i?) .ftft/m l. ,3H: ( 238) .
v:.,, : ; . ,;,fti ft,58
vi '.per 4 : ..i F POB- J 59 ,, 283 K- ft,ftft52ft-r-/--- ft,,ftftft46 ' ft . ft :! 3 ! 2 Re i)-B^ 0,:84 i 176), Bkg^ ft ,, 1 6 f 34), P/B^ 5.146, y 9"; S d df-v 20
.-Vi Spe.: :.i ! ; 'F'i !-'o?^ l ft? , 66ft K- ft . ;i . S :l. A 9 -i /~ ft.ftftll/ i ft ~fr~- 1.:39.::?-i ( 29070), Bkg- ©.68 ( 1415,, P/B- ; :.',,59^ S'tcl dev 2ft sec
,:Q U-ff, X- 60.3125 Y^ 42.7522 Z^ l l ,, 1 69ft
,-.'t t; J 4 113 AL2 CR4 MN4 FE4 r!G4 HA3 K\3 NA:l
206.43
•' CORRECTION 15.00 KV
••K 0•:: ft-K ftK ft
•l: ft•'- ft
,i)•K ft•K ft-K ft•i-:: ft:-*
K,, 1. '--''99
.0008
.001. 1
.32783, 0003
,ft:i77.0708,, : :: . 1 7.0000M '..v -. j ..y v'j
•' :. '.".' \3r, J. - J f X
i:: 7. : i1 . ft 1 71 .1601. . 0531 . 1 681 .1931 .1651. . 0 1. 41 .0491 .080
1 . 0390.975
[A]1 .2561 .0421 .4221 .0191 .0121 .010
1 . 504l .0411 .0531 .900
2,, 64 7
[' F jft,, 9980.9980.9910.9961 .0001 .000
0.9940.9990.97.20.9951 .000
r 7 API
1 27751 .2071 .4831 . 1 861 . 2081 .1771 . 5 1 61 .0911 .1051 .9642.579
4 ft. ft ftMDl
0.0270.0340.018
0.0680 . 0580.0620 . 0 1 90.023ft . 0220.020
Deg 17!:: Rr ^AtomX19.840.05ft ,, -: 30.26(Z) . ft 1ft . '799.659.030.00
0.3759.86
Total -
wt "f.25
ftft0
0
21 0:i 6ft0
4399
. 50
.10,, 1 6.62.04.037/4. 'b 6.00
.39
.82,. 95
2Norm w t X
250ftftft2
10
160ft
43
, :-;i i. 1 0
. 1 6A
.62
.84
.03
. MA
.57
. 00
.39An 85DA
'i. d e
82;87..2039203•'B
,:- 8j 8'.'.t 1
20. .-i,--,
, i..- -j, 4; a] -:
R, -J •--i. i 'i t S
w !- X5 'i .55
0 , ! 70 , 3 10.900.052 . 6 1
17 , 8033 , 1 7
ft .00
0.52•- 1.00.08
Norm w t. "i54.51
0 . :! 70 . 30
0.90
0.052.61
17.7923,150.00
0.52
Miner a i6 Ox y
L .9830•:; . ftft-460,013i.ft, ft 2590.00.14
0,079409? 64 70,9023ft .-0000
0,03694 ,, 0 1 1 4
Formal a4 Cat
1 7?763ft,, 0ft 4 60.0130
0.0259(2) . 00 1 40.0792ft,, 962 ftft.89980 .0000
0.03685 . 9830
-. PER REGAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992
J 2J 203J''
0LI
( tj
j
1
I
l
l
K'3
t
A(i
137. 76
.0222.09
.0030.68
1.446.541.81
100.36
5.918 *.082 6.000
3.996 *.002 *.000 3.998
1.527 *4.019 *
.304 *
.191 b. 04124.000 *
ALM 89.04PYRP 6.73GROS 4.23
F/M 2.757F/ FM .734
it39.42
.0522.65
.0425.91
.3910.532.58
101.57
5.933 *.067 6.000
3.949 *.006 *.005 3.960
2.362 *3.261 *
.416 *
.050 6.08924.000 *
87.5011.161.33
1.402.584
339.49
.0422.48
.0325.30
.5310.372.57
100.81
5.974 *.026 6.000
3.982 *.005 *.004 3.990
2.338 *3.201 *
.417 *
.068 6.02424.000 *
86.8511.30
1.84
1.398.583
439.65
.0422.56
.0024.14
.5010.682.57
100.14
6.002 *.000 6.002
4.024 *.005 *.000 4.029
2.410 *3.056 *
.417 *
.064 5.94724.000 *
86.4011.78
1.81
1.295.564
536.33
.1820.13
.0018.0621.42
1.251.98
99.35
5.982 *.018 6.000
3.888 *.022 *.000 3.910.307 *
2.487 *.349 *
2.987 6.13024.000 *
42.706.00
51.30
17.844.947
636.81
.1120.27
.0018.0421.29
1.282.27
100.07
6.006 i.000 6.006
3.897 *.013 *.000 3.911.311 *
2.462 *.397 *
2.942 6.11224.000 *
42.446.84
50.72
17.359.946
736.78
.0820.26
.0018.3821.381.262.17
100.31
5.997 *.003 6.000
3.890 *.010 *.000 3.900.306 *
2.506 *.379 *
2.953 6.14524.000 *
42.936.49
50.58
17.827.947
836.54
.1819.96
.0018.2821.94
1.271.27
99.44
6.016 *.000 6.016
3.873 *.022 *.000 3.895.312 *
2.517 *.224 *
3.060 6.11224.000 *
43.393.86
52.75
17.893.947
. Si""" E WK 30 SINGLE GRAIN CENTRALJ S. c WK-30 CENTRAL AGAINi SAMPLE WK-30 NEAR MARGINJ SAMPLE WK-30 INT REGION
5 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN6 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN7 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN8 SAMPLE WK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGIN
iPER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992
M 9
i'iO
•j 3J 3J
'j
. t
'l
1
1L
i;-:
i
H
"J
930.96
.1820.33
.0018.5522.021.232.02
101.29
5.981 *.019 6.000
3.858 *.022 *.000 3.880.297 t
2.511 *.350 *
18 6.17624.000 *
ftLM 42.70PYRP 5.96GROS 51.34
F/M 18.635F/F1 949
1036.49
.1620.74
.0022.8118.951.07
.46100.68
5.953 *.047 6.000
3.940 *.020 *.000 3.960.260 *
3.112 *.080 *
2.619 6.07124.000 *
53.551.38
45.06
22.0259S7
H36.45
.0920.83
.0023.1219.171.07
.32101.05
5.936 *.064 6.000
3.933 *.011 *.000 3.944.260 *
3.149 *.056 *
2.644 6.10824.000 *
53.84.95
45.21
22.3049S7
1236.56
.0421.18
.0021.8319.62
.96
.54100.73
5.948 *.052 6.000
4.009 *.005 *.000 4.014.233 *
2.970 *.094 *
2.704 6.00124.000 *
51.491.63
46.87
24.373q*i
1337.88
.1321.16
.0128.49
1.044.927.02
100.65
5.944 *.056 6.000
3.857 *.015 *.001 3.873
1.151 *3.739 *1.180 *
.138 6.20824.000 *
73.9323.342.73
3.369171
1437.77
.1221.01
.0028.37
1.135.037.18
100.61
5.935 *.065 6.000
3.825 *.014 *.000 3.839
1.178 *3.728 *1.209 *
.150 6.26524.000 *
73.2823.762.96
3.292-i(.~i
1538.03
.1321.44
.0028.02
.975.067.19
100.84
5.940 *.060 6.000
3.886 *.015 *.000 3.901
1.178 *3.660 *1.203 *
.128 6.16924.000 *
73.3224.112.57
3.216It 7
1642.75
.4221.892.487.23
.3021.75
4.60101.42
5.985 *.015 6.000
3.596 *.044 *.275 3.9b
4.539 *.847 *.690 *.036 6.111
24.000 *53.8543.892.26
.1941 l 1
SAMPLE UK-40 GRAIN l CENTRE TO MARGINSAHPLE HK-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGINSAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGINSAMPLE M-40 GRAIN 2 CENTRE TO MARGIN
13 SAMPLE UK-40 GRAIN 314 SAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 315 SAMPLE HK-40 GRAIN 316 SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN l
.'PER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992
17•2 4 2.10J2 .35ii 2 1.84J 3 2.29j 6.93
: .29) 21.87J 4.67l 100.34
i 5.954 *.046 6.000
3.594 *I .037 **. .256 3.887J 4.610 *: .820 *
.-t .708 *.035 6.172
24.000 *ALM 52.47PYRP 45.30GROS 2.22
i, .185F/FM .156
' SAMPLE HK-31 GRAIN•i SAMPLE HK-31 GRAINi S AMPLE HK-31 GRAINi S AMPLE HK-31 GRAIN
JPER RECAL
25J2 36.52J2 .04J3 21.05 j 3 .03'J 30.56j 10.22J 1.62J .43i 100.47
i 5.944 *L .056 6.000
3.982 *; 005 *
j04 3.991.393 *
: 4.160 *.075 *
\ 1 .409 6.03724.000 *
ALM 73.71OVDD 1 77
1842.
.21.2.6.
21.4.
100.
6.003.000
3.582.041.303
4.548.780.706.048
24.000
112it.
633959726240676870
t6.003
tt
3.927ttt
6.082t
50.8446.053.11
.182
.154
1938.21
.0222.25
.0132.061.186.381.11
101.22
5.943.057 6
4.020.002.001 4
1.4794.170.185.155 5
24.0009243
2.
GARNET ANALYSES
2636.
21.
30.10.1.
101.
5.931.069
3.963.004.000.395
4.142.083
1.46124.000
690317006467644832
t6.000
tt
3.967ttt
6.081t
72.851 A t.
2736.71
.0520.90
.0030.1710.741.60.25
100.42
5.976
* 5..000* 4.*
.024* 1.* 4.*.989* 24..45.10.45
925745
, EXPLOITS
* 5..024 6.000
3.985.006.000 3.388
4.107.044
1.481 624.000
72
* 3.*
.991** 2.*.020 3.i 24..9371
2038.23
.0022.12
.0031.901.196.511.14
101.09
951 *049 6.000008 *000 *000 4.008510 *153 *190 *157 6.010000 *
92.294.233.49
2.853.740
21222324
i EXPLORATION
2836.61
.1719.89
.0017.8523.80
.622.13
101.07
980 *020 6.000808 *021 *000 3.829151 *438 *373 *293 6.255000 *
39.95A 1 1
2137
21
31161
99
5.944.056
3.957.004.000
1.5004.183.213.187
24.000
SAMPLESAMPLESAMPLESAMPLE
R.
.63
.03
.56
.00
.67
.40
.37
.26
.92
* 66.000
* 3t
3.960* 1* 3* 1
6.084* 24
91.264.654.09
2.914.745
HK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAINHK-31 GRAIN
L. BARNETT
2936
19
1724
2101
6.002.000
3.780.026.000.145
2.391.387
3.34924.000
.90
.21
.72
.00
.58
.31
.60
.22
.54
* 66.002
* 3*
3.805** 2t
6.273 3* 24
39.03* 71
2238.74
.0321.25
.0024.81
.474.949.84
100.08
..031 *.000 6.031.899 *.004 *.000 3.902.146 *..230 *.641 *.062 6.080.000 *
65.4733.271.26
2.872.742
2333
MARCH 28,1992
3036.44
.2719.20
.0018.2623.12
.602.00
99.89
.026 *
.000 6.026
.742 *
.034 *
.000 3.775
.148 *
.525 *
.354 *
.238 6.266
.000 *41.28
C. T O
2338.51
.0621.34
.0025.10
.715.109.87
100.69
5.978 *.022 6.000
3.881 *.007 *.000 3.888
1.180 *3.258 *1.642 *.093 6.173
24.000 *65.2632.871.87
2.840.740
3137.76
.0421.72
.0331.371.2B6.651.57
100.42
5.926 *.074 6.000
3.942 *.005 *.004 3.951
1.555 *4.117 *.264 *.170 6.107
24.000 *90.46
e, flfi
2438
21
26
57
101
5.985.015
3.918.002.000
1.2933.4071.307.115
24.000
.70
.02
.58
.00
.34
.88
.61
.89
.02
t6.000
tt
3.921ttt
6.123i
70.5427.072.39
2.723.731
3237
21
31161
100
5.945.055
3.976.001.002
1.5324.114.256.153
24.000
.82
.01
.76
.02
.29
.15
.54
.52
.11
t6.000
**
3.980**t
6.055*
90.95^ t, i
f/M F/FM
14.169.934
SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 4, SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 4S' ' r UK-31 GRAIN 4St. . L W K-31 GRAIN 5
PER RECAL
14.J80 14.394 37.968 39.464 38.973.934 .935 .974 .975 .975
29 SAMPLE WK-31 GRAIN 530 SAMPLE HK-31 GRAIN 531 SAMPLE WK-3232 SAMPLE WX-32
GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992
2.756.734
2.784.736
332 38.262 .00j 21.66i .03
31.671.16b. 551.54
100.87
5.973 * 6.027 6.000
3.957 * 3.000 *.004 3.961
1.524 *4.135 * 2.258 *.153 6.070 2
7" ^00 * 24A 90.96PYRP 5.67GROS 3.37
F/M 2.814F/FM .738
SAMPLE WK-32SAMPLE WK-34 GRAIN 1SAMPLE WX-34 GRAIN 1SAMPLE WK-34 GRAIN 1
PER RECAL
412 37.922 .04; 21.69: .00
33.311.475.08 -1,27
100.78
* 5.u^4 6.000
4.004 * 3.005 *.000 4.009
1.193 * 14.390 * 4.214 *
3436
19
201911
99
.016
.000
.871
.006
.000
.295
.822
.348
.682
.000
.44
.05
.90
.00
.44
.18
.20
.97
.18
*6.016
*t
3.877*t*
6.147*
48.225.95
45.83
18.640.949
GARNET
4238
21
33151
101
.984
.016
.982
.002
.000
.217
.403
.214
.04
.02
.57
.00
.47
.46
.19
.27
.02
*6.000
tt
3.984t*t
3536.59
.1120.04
.0020.1619.441.211.62
99.17
6.029 *.000 6.029
3.891 *.014 *.000 3.905.297 *
2.778 *.286 *
2.713 6.07524.000 *
48.094.95
46.96
18.478.949
3636.56
.1020.15
.0020.2719.461.091.70
99.33
6.019.000 6
3.909.012.000 3.267
2.791.300
2.714 624.000
485
46
20.-
*.019tt.921**t.072t
.08
.17
.75
579954
37383940
ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION
4337.27
.0021.14
.0035.443.563.05.83
101.29
5.963 *.037 6.000
3.948 *.000 *.000 3.948.727 *
4.742 *.142 *
4437.38
.0521.12
.0034.963.633.05.89
101.08
5.981.019 6
3.963.006.000 3.727
4.678.153
t.000t*.969**t
3739.31
.0321.97
.0226.57
.8010.011.82
100.53
5.998 * 5.002 6.000
3.947 * 3.003 *.002 3.953
2.276 * 23.390 * 3.298 *.103 6.067
24.000 * 2489.437.852.73
1.535.605
SAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-34 GRAINSAMPLE WK-36
R. L. BARNETT
4537.31
.0121.15
.0035.093.522.79.86
100.73
5.992 * 5.008 6.000
3.995 * 3.001 *.000 3.996.668 *
4.713 * 4.14ft *
3839.34
.0522.17
.0426.86
.8310.121.75
101.16
.971 *
.029 6.000
.936 *
.006 *
.005 3.946
.289 *
.409 *
.285 *
.107 6.090
.000 *89.707.492.81
1.536.606
222
MARCH 28,1992
4636.08
.0320.49
.0029.8112.01
.57
.5299.51
.974 *
.026 6.000
.972 *
.004 *
.000 3.976
.141 *
.128 *(W t
3939.
.
22.
26.,
10.1.
100.
5.992.008
3.975.007.005
2.2683.352.298.100
24.000
4735.
20.f
28.12.
,
.
98.
5.955.045
3.963.005.000.139
4.042ftQR
420623043778018374
t6.000
t*
3.986ttt
6.019t
89.387.952.68
1.522.604
4038
21
32151
100
6.029.000
3.989.000.000
1.2134.326.219.200
24.000
.31
.00
.51
.00
.87
.50
.17
.30
.66
t6.029
tt
3.989**t
5.958t
91.174.624.21
3.732.789
48680438009663565580
l6.000
lt
3.968tti
35
20
2912
99
5.962.038
3.955.005.004.146
4.133i\ m
.88
.04
.39
.03
.74
.09
.59
.49
.25
t6.000
t*
3.964tt*
. 1 70
24.000ALMPYRPGROS
F/M1
J . 7 7 1
*
91.454.47
4.09
3.843.794
. 1 7 J O.UiO
24.000 *91.514.454.04
3.778.791
.tOi U.U71
24.000 *88.362.658.99
7.183.878
.1 7i U.UjU
24.000 *87.892.879.24
7.108.877
.1 / 7 U.VVU
24.000 *88.262.778.97
7.774.886
1 . UO** U . VI J
24.000 *69.911.56
28.53
41.317.976
i . ; uj u . uu j
24.000 *68.211.66
30.13
41.832.977
l . i \JL u . yuu
24.000 *69.791.47
28.74
39.927.976
SAMPLE HK-36SAMPLE UK-36SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN lSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN l
45 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN l46 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 247 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 248 SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 2
'PER RECAL GARNET ANALYSES, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION R. L. BARNETT MARCH 28,1992
4939.70
L1 .01•l 2 2.06•:l . 03
25.83 ..64
10.302.02
100.59
6.026 *.000 6.026
3.946 *.001 *.004 3.950'30 *J9 *.329 *.082 6.020
24.000 *ALM 88.37PYRP 8.90GROS 2.23
F/M 1.442F/FM .591
SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN
. SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN
PER RECAL
572 38.70
.04l 22.01l M
27.95.60
8.642.45
100.48
5.960 *.040 6.000
3.954 *flflt t
5039.62
.0222.49
.0226.31
.6610.222.06
101.40
5.978 *.022 6.000
3.977 *.002 *.002 3.981
2.298 *3.320 *.333 *.084 6.036
24.000 *88.838.912.26
1.481.597
3334
GARNET
5838.49
.0321.92
.0129.92
.707.991.13
100.19
5.978 *.022 6.000
3.989 *004 *
5139.46
.0222.24
.1226.24
.7410.132.03
100.98
5.984.016 6
3.958.002.014 3
2.2903.328.330.095 6
24.0008882
1.-
ANALYSES
5938.45
.0022.04
.0030.99
.708.061.20
101.44
5.928.072 6
3.931.000
5239.18
.0022.60
.0029.15
.648.881.17
101.62
* 5.962 *.000 .038 6.000* 4.014 ** .000 *.975 .000 4.014* 2.014 ** 3.709 ** .191 *.042 .082 5.996* 24.000 *
.68 93.14
.79 4.79
.53 2.07
495 1.883599 .653
53545556
, EXPLOITS EXPLORATION
6038.53
.0121.84
.0030.33
.737.861.25
100.55
* 5.976 *.000 .024 6.000* 3.968 ** .001 *
5338.97
.0322.03
.0029.34
.628.831.13
100.95
5.981 * 5.019 6.000
3.965 * 4.003 *.000 3.969
2.020 * 23.766 * 3.186 *.081 6.052
24.000 * 2493.394.612.00
1.904.656
SAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN
R. L. BARNETT
6137.82
.0121.66
.0131.721.616.481.18
100.49
5.941 * 5.059 6.000
3.951 * 3.001 *
5438.89
.0022.30
.0128.84
.688.831.10
100.65
.973 *
.027 6.000
.009 *
.000 *
.001 4.011
.021 *
.704 *
.181 *
.088 5.995
.000 *93.224.562.23
1.876.652
4455
MARCH 28,1992
6237.11
.0021.54
.0330.941.666.161.20
98.64
.934 *
.066 6.000
.993 *
.000 *
5538.62
.0422.12
.0427.99
.778.472.48
100.53
5.949 *.051 6.000
3.964 *.005 *.005 3.974
1.945 *3.606 *.409 *.100 6.060
24.000 *87.619.952.44
1.906.656
6337.04
.0121.32
.0332.351.705.751.24
99.44
5.918 *.082 6.000
3.931 *.00! *
5638.97
.0222.08
.0427.68
.728.732.47
100.71
5.977 *.023 6.000
3.968 *.002 *.005 3.975
1.996 *3.550 *.406 *.094 6.046
24.000 *87.6710.022.31
1.826.646
6437.56
.1420.34
.0033.001.162.106.53
100.83
6.010 *.000 6.010
3.835 *.017 *
j 1.9B3 * 1.850 *i. tOO * 3.886 *
H .404 * .188 *H .086 6.073 .092 6.016
24.000 * 24.000 *ALM 88.01 93.28
9.88 4.51bhuS 2.10 2.21
F./M 1.858 2.151F/FM .650 .683
; SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 5i SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 69 SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 6j SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 6
UPER RECAL GARNET
65 6602 37.45 37.3902 .07 .0903 20.57 20.5403 .00 .000 33.01 32.46,0 1.21 1.14.u 2.21 2.110 6.78 6.50H 101.30 100.23
I 5.969 * 6.004 *L 031 6.000 .000 6.004
..833 * 3.887 *1 .008 * .011 *R .000 3.842 .000 3.898
j .525 * .505 *E 4.400 * 4.359 *i 1.158 * 1.118 *
;N .163 fc.247 .155 6.13824.000 * 24.000 *
ALM 76.91 77.39PYRP 20.24 19.85GROS 2.86 2.75
F/H 8.692 8.939F/FH .897 .899
S SAHPLE HK-37 GRAIN 8i SAHPLE HK-37 GRAIN 87 SAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN 9d SAMPLE WK-37 GRAIN 9
1.8523.995.198.091
24.000
* 1.* 3.t
6.137* 24.
93.244.632.13
2.207.688
ANALYSES, EXPLOITS
6738
21
29181
100
5.976.024
3.969.001.001
1.8913.769.228.165
24.000
.68
.01
.93
.01
.17
.26
.21
.38
.65
* 5.6.000
* 3.t
3.971* 1.* 3.*
6.053* 24.
90.555.493.96
2.081.675
817934208096000
ttt
6.055
1.517 * 14.16) * 4.199 *.214 6.097
.468
.137
.206
.225* 24.000 * 24.000
92.844.902.26
2.218.689
61626364
. EXPLORATION
6838.
.
21.
28.1.8.1.
99.
951049976001000888755239174000
160190007932124373
*6.000
tt
3.977*tt
6.056t
90.085.734.18
2.082.676
69707172
90.994.344.68
2.888.743
SAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE WK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN
R. L. BARNETT
6938.50
.0121.94
.0028.991.138.071.41
100.05
5.979 * 5.021 6.000
3.993 * 3.001 *.000 3.995
1.868 * 13.765 * 4.235 *.149 6.016
24.000 * 2490.765.663.58
2.095.677
SAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAINSAMPLE HK-37 GRAIN
7778
MARCH
7037.
21.
31.3.4.1.
100.
.982
.018
.969
.000
.000
.010
.198
.329
.516
.000
9101010
*l*
6.036t
90.584.504.92
2.971.748
28,1992
590026005483269341
*6.000
tt
3.969*tt
6.053*
83.246.5310.24
4.665.823
1.3694.322.212.230
24.000
7137.
21.
31.3.4.1.
100.
5.972.028
3.992.001.000
1.0164.202.317.487
24.000
*t*
6.134t
90.724.454.83
3.325.769
.5014.4161.119.157
24.000
i
t
f
6.193*
77.5719.672.76
9.131.901
72510143005661288626
t6.000
*t
3.993tl*
6.022t
83.946.349.72
4.617.822
37.t
21.t
32.3.4.1.
100.
5.917.083
3.971.000.003
1.0324.257.310.481
24.000
280067020758368280
*
6.000**
3.973t**
6.079t
84.336.139.53
4.594.821
FINAL REPORT ON OPAP PROGRAM
APPENDIX 4
GRID COORDINATES /y
LOCATION
DIAMOND D RILL C ORE LGG SHEET NO.
TESTS DEPTH DIP
BEARING.
DIP AT COLLAR
LOGGED l
SYSTEM OF MEASURE
PROPERTY -
CLAIM NO. P
HOLE NO.
CORE SIZE
STARTED —
TOTAL DEPTH OF HOLEFINISHED
DATE LOGGED:FOOTAGE
FROM TO
DESCRIPTION
"7^?SAMPLE
NO.
ASSAYS
7. CU Vo 2N Nl
CORE LENGTH
FROM TO WIDTH
QQi
VJ
"3-
T
C
' Jd js) -J . (S* U We k cJw.lo.--4 '' C-
ci
Kfrf~Y fv
e^ V\CV^O
(JCONTRACTOR Djl/ Lil *
SHEET NO.
DIAMOND DRILL CORE LOG PROPERTY
HOLE
FOOTAGE
FKOM TODESCRIPTION
SAMPLE NO.
ASSAYS
AU OZ . CU •Z. 2N ".', N l
CORE LENGTH
FROM TOAC
WIC
f+0 i/v/vOcdD J
^
xT ^
- CVv^
\o~-VlOU
-^
Oi^ cL-Uo^ ^y-y cn,
C L H : -
k
HJ
fc^.^. O C- S
SHERLOCK TWP (M. 1114)
BM
CHAPLEAU-
NEMEGOSEND
PROVINCIAL
(D 00 O
QL ^H-
UJ 2O^ LU
PAUL TWP. (M. 1052) WARREN TWP. (M. 1176)
42B07SW0002 OP92-269SHERLOCK 200
LEGENDHIGHWAY AND ROUTE No
OTHER ROADS
TRAILSSURVEYED LINES:
TOWNSHIPS. BASE LINES. ETC.LOTS. MINING CLAIMS. PARCELS. ETC.
UNSURVEYED LINESLOT LINESPARCEL BOUNDARYMINING CLAIMS ETC
RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -*
UTILITY LINES NON PERENNIAL STREAM FLOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN RESERVATIONS ORIGINAL SHORELINE MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES TRAVERSE MONUMENT
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS
TYPE OF DOCUMENT
PATENT, SURFACE A MINING RIGHTS.. SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.._..MINING RIGHTS ONLY____.
LEASE SURFACE Si M INING RIGHTS..." .SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.___.
" .MINING RIGHTS ONLY.__....
LICENCE OF OCCUPATION ..__..._. ORDER-IN-COUNCIL ————-.—.
RESERVATION.______._____.....
CANCELLED ___.......___......-SAND * GRAVEL __.....___........
SYMBOL
9 Q
. OV
^. OG
NOTE: MINING RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED PRIOR TO MAY 6. 1913. VESTED IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.S.O. 197O. CHAP. 38O. SEC. 63. SUBSEC 1.
NOTES
400' Surface Rights Reservation around all lakes and rivers.
MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS WITHDRAWN UNDER SECTION 42 OF THE MINING ACT R.S.O. 1970 ORDER NO. W86/70 DATED SEPT. 22,1970.
RESERVE
TOURIST C flMps
SCALE: 1 INCH ~ 40 CHAINS
FEETO 1000 WOO 40OO OOOO aooo
O 3OO METRES
1000 (1 KM)
2OOO(2 KM)
ACRES HECTARES
TOWNSHIP OF
LINCOLNDISTRICT OF
SUDBURYMINING DIVISION
PORCUPINE
Ministryof Surveys andNatural MappingResources B ranch
Ontario
Datt 25/27 1980
National Topographic Strict
Plan No.
M.989
fTL-2*70
o eg
Kapuskosing Twp.-M.96! Lougheed Twp.-M.996
Mb K
CHAPLEAU NEMEGOSENDA
CHAPLEAU NEMEGOSENDA
RIVER PROVINaAL
PARK
Lincoln Twp.- M.989
MAGNETIC INCLINATION
9- WEST
CM
O OC. O 'C O)
V^T
THE TOWNShHP OF
SHERLOCKDISTRICT OF
SUDBURY
PORCUPINEMINING' DIVISION
SCALE: 1-INCH 4O CHAINS
LEGEND
PATENTED LANDCROWN LAND SALELEASESLOCATED LANDLICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONLYSURFACE RIGHTS ONLYROADSIMPROVED ROADSKING'S HIGHWAYSRAILWAYSPOWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKEGMINESCANCELLED
4- REMOTE TOURIST CAMPS
*c.
NOTES
4OO* Surface Rights Reservation around atl lakes and rtvers.
© MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS WITHDRAWN UNDER SECTION 42 OF THE MINJNG ACTv R.S.O. I970. ORDER NO. W86/70 DATED SEPT. 22. 1970.
aw
///fffiPLAN NO.- M.III4
ONTARIO -
MINISTRY OPNATURAL RESOURCESSURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH *
\
)
TRIM LINE
eh01on O
o o
Ol/) uo10
PAUL TP. M-1052
SANDY TP. M-109042B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK
MAGNETI DECLINATy WES
1OoN
Q.
CO
UJ
L
*" " NOTES
400' surface rights reservation along the shores of all ^ lakes and rivers.
Lumber
S7. 02. /B.
LEGEND
nij
PATENTED LANDPATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY
.LEASELICENSE OF OCCUPATION CROWN LAND SALES LOCATED LAND CANCELLED MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY HIGHWAY 4 ROUTE NO. ROADS TRAILS RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES
r *
'used only; with summer resort locations or when space Is limited
TOWNSHIP OF
' MURDOCKDISTRICT OFSUDBURY
PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION
SCALE : 1 INCH 40 CHAINS (1/2 MILE)DR. R.W.N.
DATE JUNE 22,72. PLAN NO. M-2220ONTARIO
MINISTRY Of NATURAL RESOURCES*- ' /*-
SURVEYS AND MAPPING BRANCH
OP72.-T-
t
01C/1 01O
o o
l \
Sample number
CLAIM BLOCK
r o me diopside grains
13ryrope grans
Sample location
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 230
WORK AREAS, SAMPLE S IJTIS -COMPILATION
PORCUPINE MINING DISTRICT, ONTARIO
Date
Scale
MAP No.
Revised
Oct., 92
1:100,000
2
y- - -|7
y'
1992 OPAP PROGRAMME - W. K
NTS:
Longitude:
Latitude :
Drawn by:
42B\SE
82 56'35
48 18'10
W. Kerr
ERR f G. COHOOM
42B
07SW
0002
OP9
2-26
9 SH
ERLO
CK
240
P
S O
1 f y
o
3 P -r! r,
c?- o o c 1
m *
H 90 H I-H O r* •4 w f o z lg qg D *4 fi m C 90 S K 1 ^|
* H yj 90 tff
G*
Q 8 z
o l—*
(K h— B 3 O ^ H; t* i** Ol
t* 0 * c 3 ? ^J
m tt n M
o c Xt z o * l—
* f 0) rr f* o- C o. A ** A. oo ro H*
O O
in n O) i— A H*
a * Is)
^ en o
o r o 9 A e a A •* OB
N) en "^ c^ ut
0 0) rr t O O rr i ^ VD to z ea •tte
N)
CO M R
j
13 O JB O s- l-t Z n 2 Z i-t Z Q 0 i-i ea H) 79 1-4 O
H ^J
X 50 hH 0
M X 90 r o QXN Z O 90 H X Q 93 n a CO x H 90 r R p^ ^j|
0 z CO x fr-l
•o
-
CP
o
8
N
A
0*00 BL
\r\ eio-oinvOL-
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 250
LINCOLN SOUTH GRID, LINCOLN TOWNSHIP
PORCUPINE MINING DISTRICT, ONTARIO
Date
Scale
Dwg No .
Claim no.
Oct., 92
1:2,500
5
1151234
NTS:
Longitude :
Latitude:
Drawn by:
42BXSE
82 56 '20
48 12*48
W. Kerr
VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ G. COHOON
42B
07S
W00
02 O
P92
-269
SH
ER
LOC
K
tO O
2 4 p P {ft
V p T)
*" P
P 0
< p] 30 •* t-t n > r •q t-l n r 0 z > o z n H M O CO G 30 <
P)
K 1 * * ?5 rq 90 90 f® O o o x o o z
o 1— '
4* 3 3 O ' I-"
H-4
OD
l-1
Ul
ON fo O rt fit C 3 cr *-c
-
fi 1 ?? A r-t rt
O C •A Z O m f (K rr i— rt C a t* ~"~* A OD
O IO ^ o M
M O iu ^^ A \ M • * Is)
^ en o o n 0 3 A h— rr C o- n 00 M (J1
(Jl * CO o
O su cr D O O rr . x o to z H CO ~ — J* hJ to s CO n
13 O 93 O C 13 i— i
Z PI Z Z *— ( z o o 1—*
CO H 30 H O -9 ^ O Z -3 > SO o
•x. c 90 0 O O J* CO O G -3 X 0 30 Ht
OH
Z c 90 O O n 95 H O 4 Z 0)
*— * •o
260
— 4
*00 W
— 2
*OO
W
- 2
*00
E
D --
L 9*91 N
l———l—\ L 9 *00 N
DON
i^ L5*OON
L 4'OON
IJ p ^IN IR rJ
iC^ 1*9p 8 s g i5 13 i* i* g 12 i?V - _____^———,——i——r——r
cJ
L 3*00N
L 2-00
olo•\i S ifl \S |ft |3 15 li It li-J. L 1 * 00 N
,o \o p loh^
1
|0 ^
A* 00 W
|0 ,0 U) lv'
lui 'w,o A |0 AO 10 \T 0 tO
HO W VI rj jj—T ——— 1 ——— 1 ————————
2iOOW
|0 \S-b fe T.1
1
1 0 n n .P ' li P \5
0.0 .0 fi* U lo) FJcj r*-) *^ (\i1 — 1 —— i — rCf ————— i —— r—
ft* tt— 1 —— 1 —— 1 —
D O
i r -T- tj1 2*OOE
0*00 BL
L OOON
R vr-vc* -
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 270
x rv- LINCOLN NORTH GRID, SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP
PORCUPINE MINING DISTRICT, ONTARIO
Date
Scale
Dwg No .
Claim no.
j !
Oct., 92 j NTS: l
1:2,500
4
1181563
1
Longitude: !
Latitude: i
Drawn by: j
42BXSE
82 56'35
48 IS'IO
W. Kerr i
VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ G. COHOON
1.00W , 1*50E 3*00 E
D----- /L. L 0*OOS
L1*OOS
L 2*00 S
'Ms s /* *l l l ' l l l
L 1-DOS
L 7*00 S
N
A
000 BL
\T xo
* t
lr\4ervaL -
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK 280
SHERLOCK EAST (JRID, SHERLOCK TOWNSHIP
PORCUPINE i.INING DISTRICT, ONTARIO
Date
Scale
Dwg No .
Claim no.
. Oct., 92
1:2,500
3
1151235———————————
NTS:
Longitude: ;—————— 2. ————————— f—
Latitude: j
Drawn by: |
42BXSE
82 54'01
48 20'20
W. Kerr
VERTICAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY- W. KERR @ C. COHOON
o
-300 N
-200 N
-100 N
-O
500 S-
600 S-
- 100 S
200 S
-300 S
-400 S
-500 S
\ 559
Oo r--
o oCO
oin
-N-
MAGNETIC FIELD- 50- 250
CONTOURS
READINGS IN GAMMAS
MAGNETOMETER - SCINTREX MF-1
CLAIM POST -
42B07SW0002 OP92-269 SHERLOCK
50
290
SCALE 1 : 2 50050 (metres) 100 150 200
VERTICAL HELD MAGNETIC SURVEYby
B. KERR ft G. COHOON
SHERLOCK WEST GRIDSHERLOCK HP., ONTARIO
DATE : June 1992 DRAWN : Geosearch Consultants Ltd.