fig s1 120414 - cshl p
TRANSCRIPT
3’UTRTTSpTSS
dTSS
5’UTRncRNAExon
Intron
Intergenic
Replicate1
Rep
licat
e 2
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15
Biological Replicates
WTPr
dm16
KO
0
5
10
15
0 5 10 15
WT/Prdm16 KOA B C
00
5
10
15
1 2 3 4 5
Pol
II R
PM
/ kb
Pol II in Gene Body
BAT-selective
WAT-selectiveCommon
# of
PR
DM
16 S
ites
/ 1M
bp
150
100
50
0
BAT-selective
WAT-selectiveCommon
H3K27-Ac.E F
10 kb3
0
4
0
PRDM16 BAT
H3K27-Ac. WAT
4
0
H3K27-Ac. BAT
Agt Retn
3
0
4
0
4
0
10 kb
D
Figure S1. PRDM16 is preferentially bound to BAT-selective genes in BAT
(A) Scatter plot comparing ChIP-seq binding profiles of PRDM16 from independent biological replicates of BAT (B) Scatter plot showing PRDM16 ChIP-seq signal in wildtype (WT) and Prdm16 KO BAT using pooled replicates.(C) Pie chart showing the relative enrichment of PRDM16 in different genomic regions (D) ChIP-seq stack-height profiles in reads per million (RPM) for PRDM16 in BAT and H3K27-Ac. in BAT and WAT at the Agt and Retn loci. (E) Box plot comparing Pol II (RPM/kb) levels within gene bodies of BAT-selective, common and WAT-selective genes with varying number of proximal PRDM16 binding sites(F) Average number of PRDM16 binding sites (per 1Mbp) at BAT-selective, common and WAT-selective regions of H3K27-Ac. enrichment
Number of PRDM16 Sites within 100kb
B
Ins1
Ucp1 (
2.5)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα
(1)
Pparα
(11)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006 C/EBPβ > IgGC/EBPβ > PPARγ
0.0000
0.0005
0.0010
0.0015
0.0020
0.0025 C/EBPβ > IgG
C/EBPβ > PRDM16
Ins1
Ucp1 (
2.5)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα
(1)
Pparα
(11)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)
Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
0.000
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008 C/EBPβ > IgGC/EBPβ > MED1
Ins1
Ucp1 (
2.5)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα
(1)
Pparα
(11)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)
Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
Figure S2. C/EBPβ, PPARγ, PRDM16 and MED1 are co-localized at BAT-selective loci
(A) De novo motif analysis at regions of PRDM16 enrichment within 100kb of genes positively or negatively regualted by PRDM16(B) Sequential ChIP analysis. Chromatin was first immunoprecipitated using an anti-C/EBPβ antibody. Sequential immunoprecipitation was performed comparing IgG to PPARγ, MED1 and PRDM16. Experiments were performed a minimum of 3 times and representative data is shown.
De Novo Motif P-Value Hit %
10−118
10−57
10−41
10−31
55.6
30.4
49.3
21.7
TF
EBF
C/EBP
NF1-half
DR1-half
PRDM16 - activated genes
De Novo Motif P-Value Hit %
10−97
10−71
10−44
43.5
47.5
61.3
TF
C/EBP
EBF
NF1-half
DR1 10−17 4.2
PRDM16 - repressed genes
A
AC/EBPβ ChIP
Ins1
Ucp
1 (2.5
)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα (1
)
Pparα (1
1)
Pparα (1
4)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5PPARγ ChIP
Ins1
Ucp
1 (2.5
)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα (1
)
Pparα (1
1)
Pparα (1
4)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
WTKO
Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
E
**** **
****
Ins1
Ucp1 (
2.5)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Pparα
(1)
Pparα
(14)
Cidea (
13)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)
Pparα
(11)
*Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
Pparγ
(122)
*
*
MED1 ChIP
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Figure S3. Loss of PRDM16 does not affect PPARγ or C/EBPβ binding levels at BAT-selective genes
(A) ChIP-qPCR analysis of PPARy and C/EBPβ binding at BAT-selective genes in WT and Prdm16 KO BAT(mean ± SEM; n = 3; *p < 0.05)(B) Relative Med1 mRNA levels in epididymal WAT, inguuinal WAT and BAT (mean ± SEM; n = 3; *p<0.05; **p<0.01)(C) Relative Med1 mRNA levels in differentiating brown adipocytes (mean ± SEM; n = 3)(D) Box plot comparing MED1 occupancy changes upon Prdm16 KO in BAT at sites that possess or lack PRDM16 binding (***p < 10−10)(E) ChIP-qPCR analysis of MED1 levels at BAT-sel. genes in WT and Prdm16 KO BAT (mean ± SEM; n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p<0.01
−4
−2
0
2
4
Log 2F
C K
O/W
T
MED1 enrichment Prdm16 KO/WT
Without PRDM16With PRDM16
D
***
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
D0 D2 D4 D6 D8
Med1 mRNAC
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
Med1 mRNA
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vels
B
*
**
eWAT
iWAT
BAT
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vels
Enr
ichm
ent (
% in
put)
Figure S4. PRDM3 binds and recruits MED1 to BAT-selective loci
(A) Relative mRNA expression levels of Prdm16 and Med1 in immortalized brown adipocytes, primary brown adipocytes, and Prdm16-deficient brown adipocytes that have been transduced with Prdm16 (mean ± stdev; n = 3; ***p<0.001)(B)MED1 protein levels from WT and Prdm16 KO adipocytes(C) Relative mRNA levels of BAT-sel. genes in PRDM16-deficient brown adipocytes that were transduced with control or PRDM16-expressing virus. (mean ± Stdev; n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 )(D) Relative mRNA levels of BAT-selective, common and WAT-selective genes from differentiated primary brown adipocytes that were transfected with siScr or siMed1. (mean ± Stdev; n = 3; *p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 )(E) ChIP-qPCR analysis of PRDM16 enrichment after acute MED1 deletion at BAT-sel. genes (mean ± Stdev; n = 3). Inset - Western blot analysis of MED1 levels after acute MED1 deletion(F) Commassie blue staining of GST and GST-PRDM16 fusion proteins
GST22
4-454
455-6
80
1-223
681-8
80
881-1
038
1039
-1176
C
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000 ***
Rela
tive
mRN
A le
vel
F
Prdm16
E siScr siMed1
MED1
ACTIN
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.51.01.52.0
Ins1
Ucp1 (
2.5)
Ucp1 (
4.7)
Ucp1 (
5.7)
Cidea (
13)
Pparα
(1)
Pparα
(11)
Ppargc
1a (3
8)
Ppargc
1a (4
2)
PR
DM
16 C
hIP
Enr
ichm
ent
(% In
put)
0123
10
20
30
40
50
****
**
**
**
***
**
Pparα
Ppargc
1aCide
aUcp
1Cox
5b
Cox7a
1Cyc
sMed
1
DAcute Knockdown of MED1
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Med1Fabp4
Pparγ
C/ebpβ
Prdm16Pparα
Ppargc1a
CideaUcp
1 AgtTle3
Gpr64Fads
Morc4 Npr3Ccn
d2
*** ** *
**
*** ****
*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
Immortalized Cells
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
Primary CellsA
******
MED1
ACTIN
WT KO
B
Prdm16 Med1 Prdm16 Med1
WTKO
WTKO
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vel
Si-Scr
Si-Med1
Ctl
PRDM16
Si-Scr
Si-Med1
Rank Term P-Value1 brown fat cell dif ferentiation 1.92E-132 fat cell dif ferentiation 2.22E-103 oxidation reduction 4.86E-094 fatty acid metabolic process 7.50E-09
5generation of precursor metabolites and energy 4.84E-08
6energy derivation by oxidation of organic compounds 5.25E-08
7 organic ether metabolic process 6.73E-078 glycerol ether metabolic process 2.94E-069 glycerolipid metabolic process 2.96E-0610 coenzyme metabolic process 2.97E-06
−0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Pol
II R
PM
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
None TE SE
Pol
II e
nric
hmen
t (R
PM
/ kb
)SETENone
Relative Position in the gene body
***
*** GO analysis for genes near SE
A B
Ucp1
Cidea
Pparα
Ntrk3
Pank1
Aspg
Kcnk3
Cpn3
Cox7a
1Cox
5bCyc
s
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
VehicleJQ1JQ1 (-)
Super Enhancers Typical Enhancers
*** *** *** *** *** ******
***
***
**
Rel
ativ
e m
RN
A le
vels
**
CJQ1- treatment
Figure S5. PRDM16 regulates Super Enhancers in BAT
(A) Average Pol II profile (RPM) around gene bodies of genes associated with super enhancers (red), typical enhancers (black), or genes without proximal MED1 occupancy (grey). Insert – box plot representation of Pol II signal (RPM/kb) of same data (***p < 10−50) (B) DAVID gene ontology (GO) analysis for super enhancer-associated genes in WT BAT(C) Relative mRNA levels of genes marked by SE or TE in differentiated primary brown adipocytes that were treated with either vehicle, JQ1 or an inert JQ1 analog (JQ1(-)) (mean ± Stdev; n = 6; *p < 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001)
Table S1 Primers used for real-time qPCR and ChIP-qPCR analysis
mRNA Fwd Rev
Agt AAGACCCTGCATGATCAGCTC CTTCCTGCCTCATTCAGCATC
Aspg ATTGCCTTCAGG GGCTGTGAC CTGGCCCAGCACATAGGACAGT
C/ebpβ ACGACTTCCTCTCCGACCTCT CGAGGCTCACGTAACCGTAGT
Ccnd2 AGCTGTCCCTGATCCGCAAGC AAGCCCACAGATGGCTGCTCC
Cidea TGCTCTTCTGTATCGCCCAGT GCCGTGTTAAGGAATCTGCTG
Cox5b GCTGCATCTGTGAAGAGGACAAC CAGCTTGTAATGGGTTCCACAGT
Cox7a1 CAGCGTCATGGTCAGTCTGT AGAAAACCGTGTGGCAGAGA
Cpn3 GCCGACATCCCTCCGGACATC TCCAGGTGACGGACCTGAGTGT
Cycs GCAAGCATAAGACTGGACCAAA TTGTTGGCATCTGTGTAAGAGAATC
Fabp4 ACACCGAGATTTCCTTCAAACTG CCATCTAGGGTTATGATGCTCTTCA
Fads TGCGCAAGTTCCTGAAACCCCT CATGTCTTCAGCTGCCTGGCG
Gpr64 CCACACCAGCCCCATCTGTCC TCCATCTGGGATACTTGGGCTTCC
Kcnk3 GCTTCGCCG GCTCCTTCTACTT CTAGTGTGAGCGGGATGCCCAG
Med1 TGCTTGGAAAATTCCTCAAAA GATGTCAAAGTGGCTCACCA
Morc4 GTATCCAGGCGCAGGCGGTTA AGATGGCTTCTAGGCTGGGCA
Npr3 GTGCGCTACATCCAAGGCAGC TCCACTGGTCATGCCGTGTCTG
Ntrk3 ATGCGAGCCCTACACCTCCTA GACTGCTATGGACACCCCAAA
Pank1 CGCTGTTCGCCCAGCATGATTC CAGCTTAACCAGGGTTCCACCGA
Ppargc1a CCCTGCCATTGTTAAGACC TGCTGCTGTTCCTGTTTTC
Pparα GCGTACGGCAATGGCTTTAT GAACGGCTTCCTCAGGTTCTT
Pparγ2 TGGCATCTCTGTGTCAACCATG GCATGGTGCCTTCGCTGA
Prdm16 CAGCACGGTGAAGCCATTC GCGTGCATCCGCTTGTG
Tbp GAAGCTGCGGTACAATTCCAG CCCCTTGTACCCTTCACCAAT
Tle3 CTCACCCACACCCCGCATCAA AAACCGCAATGTTCCCGTCGC
Ucp1 ACTGCCACACCTCCAGTCATT CTTTGCCTCACTCAGGATTGG
ChIP Fwd Rev
18s AGTCCCTGCCCTTTGTACACA CGATCCGAGGGCCTCACT
Cidea (13) GGCCACTTGAGGAGCCAACCA TGGGCACTGGCCTTGTAGCTG
Fabp4 GACAAAGGCAGAAATGCACA AATGTCAGGCATCTGGGAAC
Ins1 GGACCCACAAGTGGAACAAC GTGCAGCACTGATCCACAAT
Ppargc1a (38) TCCGAGTTTCCCTGCTGTGGC AGGGACTTGCAGCTGTGGTGG
Ppargc1a (42) GAGGTGGCACCAGGACACCAG CCCAAGCTCGAGACTCCGCTC
Pparα (1) GGGGCATGTGCATTCCGTGAC CACTGGGGCTCTGCCAACTGA
Pparα (11) AAGAGCATGGGACAGTGGCCG TGGCCAGCTGAAGGTCACCAC
Pparα (14) CCTGCCCCATAGGCAGTATGGTC ACAGGGGCAGAAGCCAAGCTG
Pparγ (122) AGCTTTGCTGGCTAGAGGTG TTTCGCAGAACTGAGGTTGA
Ucp1 (2.5) CAAATGGTGACCGGGTGCCCT GGGTGACTGACCCTCTGTGACG
Ucp1 (4.7) CCCCACTGCCTGTCACGTTCA GAAGCTGCCGAATGGTGCGTC
Ucp1 (5.7) ACCACACCATTTGGAGCCTGAC TGAGTTTGCAGGGAGGATGGGC