fhwa guidance & policies on traffic analysis james p. mccarthy, pe, ptoe federal highway...

34
FHWA Guidance & FHWA Guidance & Policies on Policies on Traffic Analysis Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration [email protected] 651-291-6112

Upload: angelina-klein

Post on 27-Mar-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

FHWA Guidance & FHWA Guidance & Policies onPolicies on

Traffic Analysis Traffic Analysis

James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOEFederal Highway [email protected]

651-291-6112

Page 2: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Traffic Analysis in Design?Traffic Analysis in Design?

• Estimate or Predict Traffic Performance For a Design

• Assess Capacity and Level of Service of a Transportation Facility

Page 3: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

What’s the Problem?What’s the Problem?

Noncongested FlowA B

CD

Forced Flow

Volume

Sp

eed

LOS E: =1VC

LOS F

Page 4: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Typology of ModelsTypology of Models

Page 5: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

What is What is FHWAFHWA Policy Policy

• Does FHWA Require Microsimulation

• FHWA Does Require That the Project Development Process and Design is Built on Good Traffic Engineering

• If Microsimulation is Needed FHWA Will Not be Able to Approve Projects Such as Interstate Access Without It.

Page 6: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Volume IVolume I

Traffic Analysis Traffic Analysis PrimerPrimer

Page 7: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Volume IIVolume II Decision Decision Support Support

Methodology Methodology for Selecting for Selecting

TATTAT

Page 8: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Consequences of Inappropriate Consequences of Inappropriate Analysis MethodsAnalysis Methods

• Unrealistic Results

• Incorrect Estimates of Traffic Performance

• Inappropriate Design of Control Strategies

• Wasted Resources

• Adverse Public Reaction to Changes

Page 9: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Microsimulation FeaturesMicrosimulation Features

• Analysis of a System

• Analysis of Over-Saturated Conditions

• Spillback

• Spillover

• Bottlenecks

• Weaves

Page 10: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Spillover EffectsSpillover Effects

Excessive Left-Turn Queue Blocks Through Lane

Excessive Left-Turn Queue Blocks Through Lane

Page 11: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Advantages of SimulationAdvantages of Simulation

• Perform “System Analysis”• Current and Alternative Conditions

• Analyze Many “What-If” Scenarios

• Experiment Without Actual Traffic Disruption

Page 12: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Advantages of SimulationAdvantages of Simulation

• Eliminate Costly Mistakes and Inadequate Project Designs

• Implement Projects in Best Order

• Make Effective Use of Limited Gas Tax Revenue

Page 13: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Successful ApplicationsSuccessful Applications

• Portray Network

• Verifiable, Reproducible and Traceable

• Supports Efficient Design/Analysis

• Validate Control Strategy/Design

• Encompass Future Needs

Page 14: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

FHWA Regulation on Traffic FHWA Regulation on Traffic AnalysisAnalysis

• FHWA Has No Specific Regulation on Traffic Analysis Methodology

• FHWA’s 23 CFR States:

“The SHA (State Highway Administration) Must be Adequately Staffed and Equipped to Carry Out the Federal-Aid Highway Program…”

Page 15: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Current FHWA Interstate PolicyCurrent FHWA Interstate Policy

•Published in the Federal Register on February 11, 1998.

The FHWA will continue to use the current edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), published by the TRB, in its review of proposed access points.

Other traffic analysis methods including simulation programs may also be used in the access request report to aid in the decision-making process. However, if the access request report does not contain an HCM analysis, the data submitted with the report must be sufficiently detailed and compatible with the HCM procedures to …..

Page 16: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

When is Simulation When is Simulation Needed?Needed?

1. For Most or All IARs in Metro Area

2. To Support Design/Project Layout For Major Reconstruction Projects

3. Changes in Operation

• HOT Lanes

• New Ramp Metering System

Page 17: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Screening AlternativesScreening Alternatives

Page 18: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

1111

TRAFFIC OPERATIONS AND DESIGN DELIVERY

0% 100%30% 60%10% 95%

PRE-DESIGN

FINAL DESIGN

HCM Micro-Sim.

Page 19: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

System PlanningSystem Planning

• Develop A Local Arterial System That Will Support The Freeway System

• Identify Access Locations Based On Needs• Provide Basic Sizing Of Roadways

FHWA Criteria No. 5The proposal considers and is consistent with local and regional land use and transportation plans.

Page 20: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

System Planning Example: System Planning Example: NE Wright CountyNE Wright County

Page 21: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Sketch PlanningSketch Planning

• Process For Quickly Identifying Design Alternatives

• Design Standards and HCM Techniques Used as a Guide For Developing Alternatives

• Allows For Considering a Wider Range of Ideas

Page 22: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Sketch Sketch Planning: Planning:

Access Access AlternativesAlternatives

Source: Metro Freeway Method Study CH2MHill

Page 23: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Sketch Planning: Sketch Planning: Evaluation of Lane ContinuityEvaluation of Lane Continuity

Page 24: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Interchange Type SelectionInterchange Type Selection• Use Sketch Planning Techniques to Screen Down

Range of Alternatives• Determine Type to be Most Compatible With Freeway

System

FHWA Criteria 2All reasonable alternatives for design options, location and transportation system management type improvements (such as ramp metering, mass transit, and HOV facilities) have been assessed and provided for if currently justified, or provisions are included for accommodating such facilities if a future need is identified.

Page 25: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Interchange Type SelectionInterchange Type Selection

Page 26: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Sketch Planning: Sketch Planning: Interchange Type EvaluationInterchange Type Evaluation

Page 27: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Alternative AnalysisAlternative Analysis

• Determine the Optimal Arrangement of:• Basic Lanes, • Auxiliary Lanes, • And Weave Lengths• Requires Minimal Effort Once Models Have Been

Created

FHWA IAR Criteria No. 3The proposed access point does not have a significant adverse impact on the safety and operation of the interstate facility based on an analysis of current and future traffic. The operational analysis for existing conditions shall, particularly in urbanized areas, include analysis of sections of interstate to and including at least the first adjacent existing or proposed interchange on either side…

Page 28: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

What is the Intent of Policy 3?What is the Intent of Policy 3?

• Demonstrate That Traffic Operations Will be Adequate System-Wide (Not Just Where the New Access Point is Proposed) For Design Year Conditions

• Show That the Proposed Plan of Access Will be Designed to Meet or Exceed Interstate Design Criteria For Safe Operations

Page 29: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

I-94 Scenario Evaluation: Auxiliary LanesI-94 Scenario Evaluation: Auxiliary Lanes

Page 30: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

20-year Design CORSIM Analysis20-year Design CORSIM Analysis

Page 31: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Year of Opening Year of Opening CORSIM AnalysisCORSIM Analysis

Page 32: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

New FHWA Interstate Policy New FHWA Interstate Policy 20082008

• “Use Appropriate Traffic Analysis Methodology and Software”

• FHWA Prefers HCM or CORSIM For Interstate Access, but does not prescribe simulation programs

• Other Simulation Programs?

Page 33: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

FHWA and MnDOT’s FHWA and MnDOT’s Advanced CORSIM GuidelinesAdvanced CORSIM Guidelines

• To Support New Microsimulation Users

• Provide a Reference For Developing

a Scope of Work

• To Support Accurate and Reusable Models – ex. I-694 & Rice St. Reused

Page 34: FHWA Guidance & Policies on Traffic Analysis James P. McCarthy, PE, PTOE Federal Highway Administration James.mccarthy@fhwa.dot.gov 651-291-6112

Thank You!Thank You!