feedback on the eseta performance analysis 28 th november 2007 performance assessment, achievements...

14
Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

Upload: victor-hart

Post on 17-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis

28th November 2007Performance Assessment,

Achievements & Challenges

Page 2: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 2

NSDS 2005-2010: 5 Objectives X 20 Success Indicators with 16 Specific for SETAs

• Prioritising and communicating critical skills for sustainable growth, development and equity (SI 1.1 and SI 1.2)

• Promoting and accelerating quality training for all in the workplace (SI 2.1, SI 2.2, SI 2.3, SI 2.4, SI 2.5, SI 2.6, SI 2.7 & SI 2.8)

• Promoting employability and sustainable livelihoods through skills development (SI 3.1, SI 3.2 & SI 3.3)

• Assisting designated groups, including new entrants to participate in accredited work, integrated learning and work-based programmes to acquire critical skills to enter the labour market and self-employment (SI 4.1, SI 4.2 & SI 4.3)

• Improving the quality and relevance of provision (SI 5.1, SI 5.2, SI 5.3 & SI 5.4)

Page 3: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 3

Other Key Result Areas

• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Equity Principles• NSDS 2005 -2010 Governance• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Funds

Management• NSDS 2005 - 2010 Provincial

Linkages

• Reported for 2005 – 2006• Measured for 2006 - 2007

Page 4: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 4

Pillars of the Current Performance Management System

• Mandate as defined by Skills Development Act as amended

• The NSDS 2005-2010 relevant to SETAs

• Service Level Agreement Regulatory Framework

• Performance Assessment Scorecard (5 KRAs)

• Governance and Performance Management Procedures

Page 5: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 5

Percentage0% -

60%61% - 80% 81% - 100%

101% - 120%

>120%

ScoreRating 1 2 3 4 5

Performance Description

Performance is Poor

Performance is Below

Requirements

Performance Meets

Requirements

Performance is Above

Requirements

Performance is Excellent

2005 – 2010 SETA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT RATING SCALE2005 – 2010 SETA PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT RATING SCALE

Page 6: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 6

SETA overall performance 2005-06

First SLA + Scorecard Results = 2005 - 2006SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved

BANKSETA 5 ISETT 3

FOODBEV 5 THETA 3

CHIETA 4 MAPPP 3

FASSET 4 MERSETA 3

INSETA 4 CTFL 3

AGRISETA 4 SASSETA 3

SERVICES 4 CETA 3

LGSETA 4 TETA 3

W&RSETA 4 HWSETA 3

MQA 4 ETDPSETA 2

FIETA 4 ESETA 2

PSETA 1

Page 7: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 7

Second SLA & Scorecard Results B = 2006 – 2007

SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved SETA Acronym Final Score Achieved

FASSET 5 MQA 4

BANKSETA 5 MERSETA 4

FIETA 5 SERVICES 4

ISETT 5 W&RSETA 4

CHIETA 4 LGSETA 3

CTFL 4 THETA 3

ETDPSETA 4 SASSETA 3

FOODBEV 4 CETA 3

INSETA 4 HWSETA 3

AGRISETA 4 TETA 3

MAPPP 4 ESETA 3

PSETA 3

Page 8: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 8

Scorecard Summary for {ESETA } for 2006 - 2007

Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for 2006 - 2007 and therefore are automatically

given a 0% weighting

Average Score

for Current Year

Weighting of

Scorecard

Page for

Current Year

Weighted Score

for Scorecard Page for

Current

Year

Positive Data

Verification

Positive Impac

t Asses

s-ment

Indicator 1.1 Skills development supports national and sectoral growth, development and equity priorities.

5 2.0%

0.10 Yes N/A

Indicator 1.2 Information on critical skills widely available to learners. Impact of information dissemination researched, measured and communicated in terms of rising entry, completion and placement of learners.

4 2.0%

0.08 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.1 By March 2010 at least 80% of large firms’ employment equity targets are supported by skills development. Impact on overall equity profile assessed.

5 10.0%

0.50 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.1 By March 2010 at least 60% of medium firms’ employment equity targets are supported by skills development. Impact on overall equity profile assessed.

5 10.0%

0.50 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.2 By March 2010 skills development in at least 40% of small levy paying firms supported and the impact of the support measured.

4 10.0%

0.40 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.3 By March 2010 at least 80% of government Departments spend at least 1% of personnel budget on training and impact of training on service delivery measured and reported (Applicable to PSETA only) N/A 0.0% N/A N/A N/A

Page 9: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 9

Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured

for 2006 - 2007 and therefore are automatically given a 0% weighting

Average Score

for Curre

nt Year

Weighting of

Scorecard Page for

Current

Year

Weighted Score

for Scorecard Page

for Current

Year

Positive Data Verification

Positive Impact Assess-ment

Indicator 2.5 Annually increasing number of small BEE firms and BEE co-operatives supported by skills development. Progress measured through an annual survey of BEE firms and BEE co-operatives within the sector from the second year onwards. Impact of support measured.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.7 By March 2010 at least 700 000 workers have entered/achieved at least ABET Levels 1-4.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 2.8 By March 2010 at least 125 000 workers assisted to enter and at least 50% successfully complete programmes, including learnerships and apprenticeships, leading to basic entry, intermediate and high level scarce skills. Impact of assistance measured.

4 10.0% 0.35 Yes N/A

Indicator 3.2 By March 2010, at least 2000 non-levy paying enterprises, NGOs, CBOs, and community-based co-operatives supported by skills development. Impact of support on sustainability measured with a targeted 75% success rate.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 4.1 By March 2010 at least 125 000 unemployed people assisted to enter and at least 50% successfully complete programmes, including learnerships and apprenticeships, leading to basic entry, intermediate and high level scarce skills. Impact of assistance measured.

5 10.0% 0.45 Yes N/A

Page 10: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 10

Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for 2006 - 2007 and therefore are automatically

given a 0% weighting)

Average Score

for Curre

nt Year

Weighting of

Scorecard Page for

Current

Year

Weighted Score for Scorecard Page

for Current

Year

Positive Data Verification

Positive Im

pact

Assess-

ment

Indicator 4.2 100% of learners in critical skills programmes covered by sector agreements from FET and HET institutions assisted to gain work experience locally or abroad, of whom at least 70% find placement in employment or self-employment.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 4.3 By march 2010, at least 10,000 young people trained and mentored to form sustainable new ventures and at least 70% of new ventures in operation in operation 12 months after completion of programmed.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 5.1 By March 2010 each SETA recognises and supports at least five Institutes of Sectoral or Occupational Excellence (ISOE) within public institutions and through Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) where appropriate, spread as widely as possible geographically for the development of people to attain identified critical occupational skills, whose excellence is measured in the number of learners successfully placed in the sector and employer satisfaction ratings of their training.

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 5.2 By March 2010, each province has at least two provider institutions accredited to manage the delivery of the new venture creation qualification. 70% of new ventures still operating after 12 months will be used as a measure of the institutions’ success

1 3.0% 0.03 Yes N/A

Indicator 5.3 By March 2010 there are measurable improvements in the quality of the services delivered by skills development institutions and those institutions responsible for the implementation of the NQF in support of the NSDS.

5 3.0% 0.15 Yes N/A

Page 11: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 11

Scorecard Page Description (Those coloured in blue will not be measured for 2006 -

2007 and therefore are automatically given a 0%

weighting)(

Average Score

for Curre

nt Year

Weighting of

Scorecard Page for

Current

Year

Weighted Score

for Scorecard Page

for Current

Year

Positive Data Verification

Positive Impact Assess-ment

NSDS 2005 – 2010 Equity Principles

2 5.0%

0.08 Yes N/A

NSDS 2005 – 2010 Governance 3 5.0%

0.16 Yes N/A

NSDS 2005 – 2010 Funds Management 3 10.0%

0.33 Yes N/A

NSDS 2005 – 2010 Provincial Linkages 4 2.0%

0.08 Yes N/A

SUB TOTAL SETA Quantitave Score 100.0%

3.40

Total percentage of scorecard pages for which SETA data is verified as current and accurate 100% 19 out of 19 Yes

SUB TOTAL SETA Score as moderated by Verification Results

3.40

Page 12: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 12

Achievements

• WSP – payment of mandatory grants to employers

• Learners and unemployed assisted in learning programmes (focus on completions)

• Provincial Linkages • DoL has good working relations with SETA

Staff• SETA responds timorously with regards

investigations (Ministerial enquires etc.)

Page 13: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 13

Challenges

• Performance poor in certain areas of NSDS, governance, Equity, Audit (qualification)

• Policies, procedures and strategies• SSP (critical and scarce skills)• Internal capacity• MIS• Reporting (quality of data)• Support from Sector / Industry to Implement SLA• Feedback to Stakeholders• Re-naming

Page 14: Feedback on the ESETA Performance Analysis 28 th November 2007 Performance Assessment, Achievements & Challenges

28/11/2007 14

Discussions (Q&A)

• Action Plan / Way Forward

• Need to address Audit Report – qualification, MoE, other matters

• SLA 2008 / 2009