federal govt contracting - teaming agreements: good, bad & the enforceable

23
US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series - 2016 Presented By: David Dempsey JUNE 3, 2016 DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

Upload: -schaus-associates-gov-con-services-events-gsa-scheds

Post on 19-Jan-2017

114 views

Category:

Government & Nonprofit


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

AGENDA

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

INTRODUCTIONHost

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

Jennifer SchausAbout The Host

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

* Approx 20 Yrs in Gov Contracting

* Career: D&B (Govt Division)

Federal Sales & GSA Scheds

* Frequent Speaker: Chambers, NCMA, AFCEA, etc

* Member: WIPG

* Education: Towson University – B.A.

UC Berkeley - Leadership Accelerator

Cornell University - Exec Leadership

Jennifer SchausJennifer Schaus & Associates

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

* DC Based Consulting Firm

* Over 10 Yrs in Business

* Support Services for Gov Cons

Proposal Writing / Contract Vehicles (GSA)

Sales & Biz Dev

Certifications – SBA 8(a); SDVO; etc.

Events

INTRODUCTIONGuest

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

David DempseyABOUT OUR SPEAKER

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

39 years experience in government procurement law and related matters

Experience covers formation, administration and litigation of government contracts in US and Europe

Focus on IT contracts, service contracts, small business issues, government accounting, intellectual property rights, export controls

David DempseyDempsey Fontana, PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

Dempsey Fontana founded in 2012 by two lawyers with + 70 years experience in government procurement law and related matters

Firm provides value to small or large companies from collective expertise and experience in virtually all areas of procurement law at rates significantly lower than those with equivalent experience

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

PRESENTATION

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

Teaming Agreements – the Good, the Bad and the Enforceable

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar SeriesTeaming Agreements

Non-disclosure Agreement:

First Rule: Do no harm to yourself - protect disclosed Intellectual Property and Proprietary Information

♥ Specifically incorporate “system” of security controls from FAR 52.204-21(b) into the NDA (effective 6/15/2016)♥ Mark disclosed information with trade secret or proprietary markings

Second Rule:Trust but verify

♦ Information exchanges through one person♦ Identify users (esp. third party users)♦ View / verify existing NDAs executed by users♦ Audit rights Jennifer Schaus & Associates DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar SeriesTeaming Agreements

Purpose of NDA and Teaming Agreement:

1.Collaborate to meet government requirements as a “Team”► learn what the government wants – if known► identify contributions to the proposal (experience, past performance, expertise, key personnel, government contacts)

► identify contributions to contract performance (% of work)

2.Objective of both parties is a subcontract relationship for duration of the prime contract

► conduct due diligence of the prime contractor or the subcontractor

Jennifer Schaus & Associates DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar SeriesTeaming Agreements

Enforceability of Teaming Agreement

Seeking to enforce the expectation that upon award of the prime contract:

1. the prime contractor will award a subcontract and 2. the subcontractor will perform the subcontract

Circumstances:

● When and where in the procurement process – MOA or TA- exclusivity / non-compete (when and why)- exchange of (NDA) information

● Do you want the teaming agreement enforced?- execute NDA; begin proposal preparation- go direct to subcontract negotiations Jennifer Schaus & Associates DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar SeriesTeaming Agreements

Enforceability of Teaming Agreement

Federal and State court decisions may deem a teaming agreement an “agreement to agree” unless certain provisions are clearly present

Cyberlock Consulting, Inc. v, Information Experts, Inc. – Teaming Agreement unenforceable (E.D.Va decision, appeal denied)(2013)

X Technologies, Inc. v. Marvin Test Systems, Inc. – exclusivity provision enforced (5th Cir. decision)(2013)

Advance Telecom Process LLC v. DSFederal, Inc. – Teaming Agreement unenforceable (Md. 2015)

A-T Solutions Inc. v. R3 Strategic Support Group, Inc. (exclusivity not enforced after RFP cancellation then reinstatement) (E.D.Va. 2016)

Jennifer Schaus & Associates DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar SeriesTeaming Agreements

Enforceability of Teaming Agreement (cont.)

Beware of or avoid language indicating:

1.Agreement only to “negotiate in good faith”

2.Non-exclusivity or ambiguous intent to award

3.Termination by teaming agreement’s own terms

e.g.: ●failure to agree on price● government disapproval without verified explanation● unilateral withdrawal● award of a subcontract (let the subcontract terminate the teaming agreement)● duration of [specific] number of months

Jennifer Schaus & Associates DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

CONCLUSIONS

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

CONCLUSIONS1. Review existing NDAs and teaming agreements for consistency with the preceding suggestions and then amend where possible

2. Assess whether another form of agreement is more suitable (CTA or joint venture) and confirm validity of such other agreement

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC

Q & A

2016 US Federal Government Contracting Webinar Series

DEMPSEY | FONTANA PLLC