federal fraud and abuse laws: civil monetary penalties
TRANSCRIPT
1
Civil Monetary Penalties LawKim C. Stanger
(2/13)
Overview
Civil Monetary Penalties Law (“CMPL”)– Prohibitions– Penalties– Exceptionsp
Applying CMPL to common situations Responding to potential CMPL problems Action items Questions?
Preliminaries
Written materials.– .ppt slides– Civil Monetary Penalties Law, 42 USC 1320a-7a.– OIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for
HospitalsHospitals
– Stanger, Health Care Transactions: Beware Stark, Kickbacks, and More
Presentation will be recorded and available for download at www.hhhealthlawblog.com.
If you have questions, please submit them using chat line or e-mail me at [email protected].
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
2
Preliminaries
This program provides an overview of the relevant law. Read the law, regulations and advisory opinions or consult
with a qualified expert when applying the law to facts. Consider other applicable laws, e.g.,
– Ethics in Patient Referrals Act (“Stark”)Ethics in Patient Referrals Act ( Stark )– Anti-Kickback Statute– State laws– Managed care contracts
This program does not establish an attorney-client relationship.
This program does not constitute the giving of legal advice.
Civil Monetary Penalties Law(42 USC 1320a-7a)
Civil Monetary Penalties Law
Prohibits certain specified conduct:– Submitting false or fraudulent claims or misrepresenting
facts relevant to services.– Offering inducements to program beneficiaries.– Offering inducements to physicians to limit services.g p y– Submitting claims for services ordered by, or contracting
with, an excluded entity.– Failing to report and repay an overpayment.– Failing to grant govt timely access.
Penalties depend on specific conduct involved.(42 USC 1320a-7a)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
3
Civil Monetary Penalties:Regulations
Implementing regulations are found at 42 CFR 1001 et seq.– 1001: Exclusion from Medicare– 1002: Exclusion from Medicaid– 1003: Civil Monetary Penaltiesy
Regulations establish:– Bases for action.– Penalties.– Administrative process for penalties.
Review both the statute and regulations when applying the laws.
Fraudulent Activities
False or Fraudulent Claims
Cannot knowingly present or cause to be presented to federal or state program a claim that is:– For an item or service that the person knows was not
provided as claimed (e.g., upcoding).– False or fraudulent.– Presented as physician service or physician extender service
but the person who presented the claim knew that: Physician was not licensed, Physician’s license was improperly obtained, or Physician misrepresented that he/she was board certified.
– For a pattern of items or services that a person knows or should know are not medically necessary.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(1))
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
4
False or Fraudulent Claim
Penalties:– Denial of payment.– $10,000 for each item or service claimed.– 3x amount claimed for item or service.
Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.(42 USC 1320a-7a(a))
May also trigger False Claims Act– $5,500 to $11,000 per false claim.– 3x the amount claimed.– Qui tam lawsuit.– Repayment of amounts improperly paid.
False or Fraudulent Claims
Cannot knowingly make, use, or cause to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim for payment for items and services furnished under a Federal health care program.
Penalty– $50,000 per each false statement or misrepresentation.– 3x amount claimed.– Denial of payment.– Repayment of amounts improperly paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(8))
False or Fraudulent Claims
Physician cannot execute a document representing that patient meets requirements for home health services if the physician knows that all of the requirements are not met.
Penalty– $5,000$ ,– 3x amount of payments for home health services made
per such certification.(42 USC 1320a-7a(b)(3))
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
5
False or Fraudulent Statement in Application or Contract
Cannot knowingly make or cause to be made false statement, omission or misrepresentation in any application, bid, or contract to participate in a Federal health care program.
Penalty– $50,000 for each false statement or misrepresentation of
material fact.– 3x amount claimed of items or services based on the
application containing the false statement or misrepresentations.
– Repayment of amounts improperly paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(9))
Violation of Provider Agreement
Cannot knowingly present or cause to be presented to any person a request for payment that violates:– Assignment limitations.– Arrangement with a state agency not to charge a person
for an item or service over allowed charge.g– Agreement to be a participating provider.
Penalty – $10,000 per item or service– 3x amount claimed.– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(2))
Discharge
Cannot knowingly give or cause to be given to any person, with respect to Medicare inpatient coverage, information that he knows or should know is false or misleading, and that could reasonably be expected to influence the decision when to discharge such person or another individual from th h it lthe hospital.
Penalty– $15,000 for each individual for which false info given.– 3x amount claimed.– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(3))
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
6
Kickbacks
.
Kickbacks
Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”)– Cannot offer, solicit, receive or pay remuneration to induce or
reward referrals for items or services payable by Federal healthcare program unless fit in safe harbor.
– 5 years in prison– $25,000 fine.(42 USC 1320a-7b(b))
AKS violation = CMPL violation.– $50,000 per violation– 3x the remuneration offered– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(7))
Kickbacks
No AKS or CMPL violation if fit within AKS safe harbor, e.g.,– Discounts– Waiver of beneficiary copays and deductibles– Bona fide employment– Personal services or management contractsg– Space or equipment rentals– Practitioner recruitment– Certain investments– Certain referral arrangements– Certain arrangements with managed care organizations– Others
(42 CFR 1001.952)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
7
Inducements to Program Beneficiaries
Inducements to Program Beneficiaries
What’s the big deal?
“Offering valuable gifts to beneficiaries to influence their choice of a Medicare or Medicaid provider raises quality and cost concerns. Providers may have an economic incentive to offset the additional costs attributable to the giveway by providing unnecessary services or by substituting cheaper or lower quality services. The use of giveaways to attract business also favors large providers with greater financial resources for such activities, disadvantaging smaller providers and business.”
(OIG Bulletin, Offering Gifts and Other Inducements to Beneficiaries)
Inducing business increases utilization and costs to Medicare and Medicaid.
Inducements to Program Beneficiaries
Cannot offer or transfer remuneration to Medicare or state program beneficiaries if the person knows or should know that the remuneration is likely to influence the beneficiaries to order or receive items or services payable by federal or state programs from a particular provider.
Penalty: – $10,000 for each item or service.– 3x amount claimed.– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(5)).
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
8
Inducements to Program Beneficiaries
Applies if know or should know that remuneration is likely to induce Medicare / Medicaid business.– No specific intent required.
“Remuneration” = anything of value, including but not limited to:– Waiver of co-pays and deductibles unless satisfy certain
conditions, and– Items or services for free or less than fair market value
unless satisfy certain conditions.(42 USC 1320a-7a(i); 42 CFR 1003.101; OIG Bulletin, Gifts to Beneficiaries)
Inducements to Program Beneficiaries
“Remuneration” does not include:– Waivers or co-pays based on financial need or after failed
collection efforts if conditions met.– Items or services if there is financial need and conditions
met.– Incentives to promote delivery of preventative care.– Payments meeting Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbor– Retailer coupons, rebates or rewards offered to public.– Any other remuneration that promotes access to care and
poses a low risk of harm to patients and federal health care programs.
– Certain other situations.(42 USC 1320a-7a(i))
Free or Discounted Items or Services
May offer free or discounted items to beneficiaries if: Remuneration is not likely to influence the beneficiary to
order or receive items or services payable by federal or state health care program.(42 USC 1320a-7a(5))
Item or service is of low value, i.e., – Each item or service is less than $10, and– Aggregate is less than $50 per patient per year.
(OIG Bulletin, Offering Gifts and Inducements to Beneficiaries (8/02); 66 FR 24410-11)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
9
Free or Discounted Items or Services
May offer items to beneficiaries if not “remuneration”. Item or service:
– Not offered as part of any advertisement or solicitation;– Not tied to provision of other federal program business;
Reasonable connection between item or service and– Reasonable connection between item or service and medical care of beneficiary; and
– Good faith determination that beneficiary has financial need.
(42 CFR 1320a-7a(i))
Free or Discounted Items or Services
May offer items to beneficiaries if not “remuneration”. Item fits within an Anti-Kickback Statute safe harbor.
– 42 CFR 1001.952(h): Discounts. Item or service promotes access to care and poses low risk
of harm to patients or federal program.of harm to patients or federal program.– Adv. Op. 11-16: OIG concluded it would not seek sanctions
based on non-profit entity’s provision of transportation, lodging and meal assistance to patients and their family where, among other things: Program not advertised in advance. Costs not claimed on cost report. Public benefit offered through program.
(42 CFR 1320a-7a(i))
Free or Discounted Items or Services
May offer item to beneficiaries if not “remuneration”. Incentives to promote certain types of preventative care
payable by Medicare or state program if:– Prenatal service or post-natal well-baby visit, or a service
described in the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s Guide to Clinical Preventive Services.
– Not tied (directly or indirectly) to provision of other services payable by Medicare or a state program.
– Not cash instrument or convertible cash.– Value of inducement not disproportionately large in relation to
value of the preventative care service or future health care costs that will be prevented.
(42 CFR 1320a-7a(i); 42 CFR 1003.101; Adv. Op. 12-21)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
10
Free or Discounted Items:Screening or Tests
OIG has approved free screening services or tests (e.g., free blood pressure check by hospital) where:– Not conditioned on the use of any items or services
from any particular provider.– Patient not directed to any particular provider.y p p– Patient not offered any special discounts or follow-up
services.– If test shows abnormal results, visitor is advised to see
his or her own health care professional.(Adv. Op. 09-11)
Advisory Opinions are not binding, but provide guidance.
Free or Discounted Items:Transportation
OIG has approved free transportation programs where, among other things:– Program open to all eligible patients; not selectively
limited to targeted beneficiary populations.– Type of transportation is reasonable (i.e., no limousine).yp p ( , )– Travel is local to physicians’ offices.– Public transportation and parking is limited.– Cost of program would not be claimed on cost report or
shifted to a federal program.(Adv. Op. 11-02; see also OIG Bulletin, Gifts to Beneficiaries)
Advisory Opinions are not binding, but provide guidance.
Free or Discounted Items:Provided by Third Party
CMPL does not prohibit an independent entity (e.g., charity) from providing free or discounted items or services to beneficiaries.
Providers could fund the items or services provided by third party so long as:– The independent entity makes and independent
determination of need, and– Beneficiary’s receipt of remuneration does not depend,
directly or indirectly, on the beneficiary’s use of a particular provider.
(OIG Bulletin, Gifts to Beneficiaries)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
11
Free or Discounted Items or Services
But offering free or discounted items may violate other laws.
Physician or physician’s family member– May violate Stark unless structured to fit safe harbor.
Other referral source for federal program businessMay violate Anti Kickback Statute if one purpose is to– May violate Anti-Kickback Statute if one purpose is to induce or reward referrals for federal program business unless structured to fit safe harbor.
Private pay patients– May violate state laws prohibiting kickbacks.
Waiving or Discounting Co-Pays or Deductibles
What’s the big deal? Medicare typically pays 80% of reasonable charge, which is
based on provider’s customary and actual charges. “A provider … who routinely waives Medicare copayments or deductibles is misstating its actual charges…”“[I]f ti t i d t [ ] ti f th i th ill “[I]f patients are required to pay [a] portion of their care, they will be better health care consumers, and select items or services because they are medically needed, rather than simply because they are free. Ultimately, if Medicare pays more for an item or service than it should, or if it pays for unnecessary items or services, there are less Medicare funds available to pay for truly needed services.”
(OIG Fraud Alert, Routine Waiver of Copayments or Deductibles)
Waiving Co-Pays or Deductibles: Red Flags
Advertising no co-pay or deductible.– “Medicare accepted as payment in full”– “No out of pocket expenses”– “Insurance only billing”.
Routine use of “financial hardship” forms without Routine use of financial hardship forms without – Good faith attempt to collect – Determination of financial need.
Collection of copays only if patient has Medigap coverage.(OIG Fraud Alert, Routine Waiver of Copayments or Deductibles)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
12
Waiving or Discounting Co-Pays or Deductibles
May waive or discount Medicare co-pays or deductibles if: Not offered as part of any advertisement or solicitation; Do not routinely waive co-pays or deductibles; and Waive or discount after
good faith determination that the beneficiary is in– good faith determination that the beneficiary is in financial need, or
– unable to collect after reasonable collection efforts.(42 USC 1320a-7a(i)(6); see also Adv. Op. 12-16)
Document factors such as local cost of living; patient’s income, assets and expenses; patient’s family size; scope and extent of bills.
Waiving or Discounting Co-Pays or Deductibles
May waive or discount co-pays if fit within AKS safe harbor. Hospital inpatient stay paid under PPS.
– Waived amounts cannot be claimed as bad debt or shifted to any other payors.
– Offered without regard to the reason for admissionOffered without regard to the reason for admission, length of stay, or DRG.
– waiver may not be made as part of any agreement with third party payer with limited exceptions.
FQHC or other health care facility under any Public Health Services Grant.
(42 CFR 1001.952(k))
Waiving or Discounting Co-Pays or Deductibles
But waiving co-pays may violate other provisions.
Physician or family member of physician– May violate Stark if physician refers designated health
services unless fit within safe harbor. Referral sourceReferral source
– May violate Anti-Kickback Statute if one purpose is to induce referrals for federal program business unless fit within safe harbor.
Private pay patients– May violate managed care contracts.– May violate state laws prohibiting kickbacks, rebates, or
fee splitting.
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
13
Prompt Pay Discounts
AKS safe harbor for waivers of copays may apply if:– Hospital inpatient.– FQHC.
OIG has approved prompt pay discounts if: – Amount of discount relates to avoided collection costs.Amount of discount relates to avoided collection costs.– Offered to all patients for all services without regard to
patient’s reason for admission, length of stay, or DRG.– Not advertised.– Notified private payors of program.– Costs not passed to Medicare, Medicaid or other payors.
(56 FR 35952; Adv. Op. 08-3)
Beware managed care contracts.
Payment to Induce Reduction or Limitation of Services
Payment to Induce Reduction or Limitation of Services
What’s the big deal?
When govt changed to prospective payment system (DRGs), – Payment for hospital episode of care was capped
despite costs involved in care.p– Govt concerned that hospitals would create incentives
to reduce costs by reducing or limiting services. Congress: “We must not tolerate hospitals paying
physicians to reduce or limit services to the elderly.”(OIG Bulletin, Gainsharing Arrangements)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
14
Payment to Induce Reduction or Limitation of Services
Hospital or CAH cannot knowingly make a payment, directly or indirectly, to a physician as an inducement to reduce or limit services provided to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries who are under the direct care of the physician.
Physician cannot knowingly accept such a payment. Penalties
– $2000 for each individual with respect to whom payment made.
– Any other penalty allowed by law.(42 USC 1320a-7a(b)(1))
Payment to Induce Reduction or Limitation of Services
“[A]ny hospital incentive plan that encourages physicians through payments to reduce or limit clinical services directly or indirectly violates the statute.” – Payment need not be tied to actual diminution in care so
long as the hospital knows that the payment may influence physician to reduce or limit services.
– No requirement that payment be tied to a specific patient or a reduction in medically necessary care.
(OIG Bulletin, Gainsharing Arrangements) Does not apply Medicare or Medicaid risk-based managed
care contracts and Medicare Advantage plans, which are governed by different statute.(Adv. Op. 12-22 at n.20)
Gainsharing
Gainsharing = arrangement in which a hospital gives physician a percentage or share of any reduction in the hospital’s cost for patient care attributable in part to the physicians’ efforts, i.e., physician shares in cost savings.(OIG Bulletin, Gainsharing Arrangements)
OIG concerned about “(i) stinting on patient care, (ii) ‘cherry picking’ healthy patients and steering sicker (and more costly) patients to hospitals that do not offer such arrangements; (iii) payments to induce patient referrals; and (iv) unfair competition among hospitals offering incentive compensation programs to foster physician loyalty and to attract more referrals.”(Adv. Op. 12-22)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
15
Gainsharing
OIG has periodically approved gainsharing in advisory opinions if certain safeguards included, e.g., – Proposed plan does not adversely affect patient care.
Quality evaluated by third party.– Low risk that incentive will lead physicians to provide
medically inappropriate care.– Payments limited in duration and amount.– Payments not tied to referrals or other suspect actions.
(See, e.g., Adv. Op. 12-22)
OIG advisory opinions do not apply to Stark.– CMS proposed Stark exception, but was not finalized.
CMS/OIG have issued interim rule waiving CMPL and Stark for ACOs.
Excluded Entities
Excluded Entities
HHS may exclude individuals and entities from participating in federal health care programs if they have been convicted of fraud, abuse, or many other offenses.– Mandatory exclusions: 42 CFR 1001.101– Permissive exclusions: 42 CFR 1001.201
States are required to exclude from Medicaid any person who has been excluded from federal programs.
Exclusion continues until OIG reinstates the entity or withdraws exclusion.– Must apply for reinstatement.
(42 USC 1320a-7 and 1320c-5; 42 CFR 1001 parts B and C)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
16
Excluded Entities
Excluded person cannot order or prescribe item or service if the person knows or should know that a claim for such item or service will be made under a federal health care program.
Penalty Penalty– $10,000 per item or service.– 3x amount claimed.– Repayment of amounts paid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(8))
Excluded Entities
Cannot knowingly present or cause to be presented a claim to a federal or state program that is for an item or service furnished by an excluded person.
Penalty: Penalty:– $10,000 per item or service.– 3x amount claimed.– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.– Criminal sanctions
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(1)(D); 42 CFR 1001.1901).
Excluded Entities
Cannot hire or contract with an excluded entity or arrange for an excluded entity to provide items services payable by federal program if knew or should know if the exclusion.
Penalties– $10,000 per claim submitted.– 3x amount of claims.– Repayment of amounts paid.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(6)).
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
17
Excluded Entities
According to the OIG, prohibition against contracting with excluded individual:– Includes administrative and management functions necessary
to providing clinical items and services.– Applies to employees, contractors, temp personnel,
volunteers or persons paid by third parties.– Cannot use federal payments to cover an excluded
individual’s salary, expenses, or fringe benefits.(OIG Bulletin, Effect of Exclusion from Program)
May contract with excluded entity if:– Paid excluded individual’s salary, benefits, and expenses
solely from non-federal funds; and– Services furnished by the excluded individual relate solely to
non-federal program patients.(Adv. Op. 03-01; OIG Bulletin, Effect of Exclusion from Program)
Excluded Entities
Excluded person cannot:– retain a direct or indirect ownership or control interest in
an entity that is participating in a federal or state program if the person knows or should know of the action constituting the basis for the exclusion, or
– be an officer or managing employee of such an entity. Penalty
– $10,000 per day the relationship continues– 3x damages– Repayment of amounts paid.
(42 USC 1320a(a)(4)).
Entities that own or manage excluded entity may be subject to exclusion.
Excluded Entities
Medicare will not pay claim if person “knew or should have known” of exclusion.– Exception for certain emergency services.
(42 CFR 1001.1901(b) and .1003.102(a))
Knowledge = g– Have actual knowledge of exclusion or sufficient facts
that you should have known of exclusion.– Notified by HHS of exclusion, e.g., in response to claim.– Listed on the List of Excluded Individuals or Entities
(“LEIE”)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
18
List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (“LEIE”) “Providers and contracting entities have an affirmative duty to
check the program exclusion status of individuals and entities prior to entering into employment or contractual relationships, or run the risk of CMP liability if they fail to do so.”
Check LEIE before hiring or contracting with entities.– Employees, contractors, vendors, medical staff, etc.
Ch k LEIE i di ll t d t i t t Check LEIE periodically to determine status.– Employees, providers, vendors, medical staff members,
ordering providers, others?– Excluded provider list updated monthly. CMS Medicare: check LEIE “periodically” or “routinely,
e.g., at least annually)” (OIG Supplemental Compliance Guidance, 70 FR 4876) CMS Medicaid: check LEIE monthly
(Letter from H. Kuhn, CMS Medicaid, 1/16/09).
https://oig.hhs.gov/exclusions/exclusions_list.asp
Failure to Report and Repay
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
19
Failure to Report and Repay
If know of overpayment, must report and return overpayment within 60 days per False Claims Act requirements.– “Overpayment” = payment to which you are not entitled,
including payment in violation CPML.– See CMS’s Proposed Repayment Rule, 77 FR 9179.
Penalty– $10,000 for each item or service.– 3x amount claimed.– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
May also be subject to False Claims Act penalties.(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(10)).
Failure to Grant Access
Failure to Grant Access
Cannot fail to grant timely access, upon reasonable request, to the OIG for purposes of audits, investigations, evaluations or other statutory functions of the OIG.
Penalties– $15,000 for each day that fail to grant access.$ , y g– Exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid.
(42 USC 1320a-7a(a)(9); 42 CFR 1001.1301)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
20
Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Waivers
ACO Waivers
Medicare Shared Savings Program (“MSSP”) promotes actions that might be prohibited under CPML, e.g.,– Inducing reduced costs to Medicare by sharing
t i ith ACO idcost savings with ACO providers.– Inducing beneficiaries to receive services from
ACO members.
ACO Waivers
CMS/OIG issued interim rules waiving CMPL, AKS and Stark for ACOs participating in MSSP.– ACO pre-participation waiver– ACO participation waiver– Shared savings distribution waiverShared savings distribution waiver– Compliance with Stark, AKS, and Gainsharing CMPL
waiver– Patient incentives wavier
Each waiver requires compliance with certain conditions.(76 FR 67992)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
21
ACO Waivers:ACO Pre-Participation
Pre-Participation Waiver– Arrangement undertaken in good faith with intent to
develop ACO that will participate in MSSP.– Parties developing ACO must take diligent steps to
develop the ACO in target year.p g y– ACO’s governing body has made and duly authorized
bona fide determination that arrangement is reasonably related to MSSP purpose.
– Must document actions and maintain documents.– Must publicly disclose arrangement.
(76 FR 67992)
ACO Waivers:ACO Participation
ACO Participation Waiver– ACO participating in MSSP and remains in good
standing.– ACO meets the MSSP requirements.– ACO’s governing body has made and duly authorizedACO s governing body has made and duly authorized
determination that arrangement is reasonably related to MSSP purpose.
– Must document actions and maintain documents.– Must publicly disclose arrangement.
(76 FR 67992)
ACO Waivers:Shared Savings Distribution
Shared Savings Distribution Waiver– ACO participating in MSSP and in good standing.– Shared savings are earned ACO pursuant to MSSP.– Shared savings are distributed among ACO
participants or used for activities related to MSSPparticipants, or used for activities related to MSSP.– For CMP gainsharing, shared savings from hospital to
physician are not made knowingly to induce a physician to reduce or limit medically necessary items or services.
(76 FR 67992)
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
22
ACO Waivers:CMPL, AKS and Stark
CMP Gainsharing, AKS and Stark Waiver– ACO participating in MSSP and in good standing.– Financial relationship is reasonably related to MSSP.– Financial relationship fits within a Stark safe harbor.
(76 FR 67992)(76 FR 67992)
ACO Waivers:Patient Incentives
Patient incentive wavier.– ACO participating in MSSP and in good standing.– Reasonable connection between items or services and
medical care to beneficiary.– Items or services are in-kind not cashItems or services are in kind, not cash.– Items or services are preventative care or advance the
following clinical goals: Adherence to treatment regime Adherence to drug requirement Adherence to follow-up care plan Management of chronic disease or condition
(76 FR 67992)
OIG Guidance
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
23
Advisory Opinions
Published advisory opinions cover such things as:– Free screenings or tests– Free preventive services– Gift cards to patients to respond to patient complaints or
promote wellness screenings– Waiving copays or deductibles– Prompt pay discounts– Gainsharing arrangements– Free transportation or other services for patients– Support for financially needy patients– Reward cards, coupons, etc. by retailer
Opinions are fact-specific, but offer guidance.
https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/advisory-opinions/index.asp
Fraud Alerts, Bulletins, etc.
Offering Gifts or Inducements to Beneficiaries (8/02) Routine Waiver of Copayments or Deductibles (12/94) Hospital Discounts Offered to Patients Who Cannot Afford to
Pay Their Bills (2/04) Questions on Charges for the Uninsured (2/04) Effect of Exclusion from Participation in Federal Health Care
Programs (9/99) Guidance for Implementing Permissive Exclusion Authority
Under Section 1128(b)(15) of the Social Security Act.
Gainsharing Arrangements and CMPs for Hospital Payments to Physicians to Reduce or Limit Services to Beneficiaries (7/99)
Beware changes in law.
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
24
https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/alerts/index.asp
Responding to a Potential CMPL Problem
If you think you have an CMPLproblem…
Don’t ignore it or attempt to sweep under rug.– Remember the False Claims Act penalties.
Don’t submit claims to Medicare or Medicaid until situation resolved.
If possible, stop suspect conduct until questions resolved. Evaluate the situation carefully.
– Confirm facts.– Review CMPL for possible exceptions.– Check for Advisory Opinion, OIG Bulletin, etc. – As necessary, seek qualified expert advice.
As necessary, revise the arrangement going forward. If necessary, repay CMS…
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
25
Repayment Obligation
False Claims Act: – Must report and repay “overpayment” within 60 days.– Overpayment = payment to which you are not entitled,
including payment in violation of Anti-Kickback Statute. Knowing failure to repay =Knowing failure to repay
– Violation of False Claims Act $5,500 to $11,000 per claim 3x damages
– Violation of Civil Monetary Penalties Law $10,000 per claim
See CMS’s Proposed Repayment Rule, 77 FR 9179 (2/16/12)
OIG Self-Disclosure Protocol
Voluntary program to self-report violations. SDP should only be used to resolve matters that
“potentially violat[e] Federal, criminal or civil or administrative laws. Matters exclusively involving overpayments or errors that do not suggest that violations of law have occurred should be brought directly to theof law have occurred should be brought directly to the attention of the [contractor].” (63 FR 58400)– Generally, SDP applies to violations that involve: Actual knowledge Reckless disregard Deliberate ignorance
– Not honest mistakes or errors.(63 FR 58399; Letters dated 4/15/08 and 3/24/09)
OIG Self-Disclosure Protocol
Benefits OIG may reduce penalties if
fully disclose and cooperate. Probably no corporate integrity
agreement. May preclude qui tam lawsuits
Risks OIG may broaden investigation. New matters discovered by OIG
are outside protocol. Failure to fully disclose or
cooperate may result in additional May preclude qui tam lawsuits. Suspends repayment under
Proposed Repayment Rule.
cooperate may result in additional penalties.
OIG may report to other government agencies.
Participation is burdensome. Likely will waive of privilege.
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
26
Self-Disclosure:Pros and Cons Example: excluded employee
– If self-report: OIG will require repayment.Salary and benefits of excluded individual
x Medicare/Medicaid %x Multiplier of 1 to 2%
Repayment amountsp y– If don’t report: things go badly if caught.
if subsequent employer reports, OIG will obtain excluded individual’s work history, then go against you.
Too late to self-report and get benefit. Subject to False Claims Act penalties for submitting improper
claims and/or failing to repay overpayment.– $5,500 to $11,000 per false claim– 3x amount of claims– Program exclusion
https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/self-disclosure-info/index.asp
Action Items
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
27
Action Items
Review arrangements with program beneficiaries.– Free items or services, such as screening.– Waivers of copays or deductibles.– Financial need policy.– Marketing or advertising programs.g g p g– Prompt pay discounts.
Review financial arrangements with physicians to ensure no inducements to limit services.– Cost savings programs.– Bonuses or compensation tied to cost savings.– Gainsharing
Establish process for monitoring .
Action Items
Make sure you are checking for excluded providers.– New hires, contracts, etc.– Medical staff credentialing.– Ordering physicians.
Periodic checks of all employees and contractors– Periodic checks of all employees and contractors. Require contractors to confirm no exclusion, including
amending contracts to require same.– Provider contracts.– Temp agencies.– Vendors.
Action Items
Ensure your compliance policies address CMPL.– See, e.g., OIG Supplemental Hospital Compliance
Program Guidance, 70 FR 4858 (2005). Train key personnel regarding CMPL compliance.
– Administration.– Compliance officers and committees.– Human resources.– Physician relations and medical staff officers.– Marketing / public relations.– Governing board members.– Purchasing.– Accounts payable.
Document training.
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
28
Action Items
If you think you have a problem:– See comments above….
Additional Resources
https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com
29
OIG Website
Compliance 101 series OIG Compliance Program Guidance
– OIG Supplemental Compliance Program Guidance for Hospitals, 70 FR at 4863-69OIG C li P G id f Ph i i– OIG Compliance Program Guidance for Physicians
Advisory Opinions Special Fraud Alerts Fraud Bulletins Letters Other materials
Additional Holland & Hart Resources
Future webinars– Health Law Basics monthly webinar series– 3/14 Physician Contracts– 4/11 HIPAA
5/9 EMTALA– 5/9 EMTALA Healthcare Update and Health Law Blog
– Under “Publications” at www.hollandhart.com.– E-mail me at [email protected].
Questions?
Kim C. StangerHolland & Hart LLP
[email protected]@hollandhart.com(208) 383-3913
Copyright © 2013, Holland & Hart LLP Kim C. Stanger 208-383-3913 [email protected] www.hollandhart.com www.hhhealthlawblog.com