fea summery report - indico-fnal (indico) · fea summery report (apa consortium meeting on march...

34
FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020 1

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

12 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

FEA Summery Report(APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020)

Ang Lee

March 30, 2020

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20201

Page 2: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

APA Shipping Frame mainly Consists of :- S355 steel Tubing with S(yield)=355 MPa; Su=470 MPa.- Carbon steel plate. - AVM Shock Absorber.

2

Summery of FEA Analysis for APA Shipping Frame

Page 3: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

The solid Model is provided by George Stavrakis in STEP file format.The ANSYS WB 19.2 is used for FEA analysis as shown above.

AVM Wire Shock Absorber

Steel Plate

Steel Tubing

3

Summery of FEA Analysis for APA Shipping Frame

Page 4: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Applicable Code used for FEA Analysis

• ASME BTH-1 Codes is used for the lifting device. It is recommended by

Compliance Office preliminary requirements_ Memorandum dated 2/11/2020 EDMS No.:2093094

for service class A.

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20204

Page 5: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Required (Safety factor) SF

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20205

ASME BTH-1 required

1) SF ≥ 2 for the structure member.

2) SF≥ 2.4 for the connections.

3) Above SF is respected to the yield

stress of the material in use.

4) The shipping frame is made of SS355

carbon steel, which has a yield stress of

355 MPa (~51.5 Ksi)

5) 7 (or more) possible configurations have

been analysed.

Page 6: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 1 _ Stress (MPa)SF=355/136.6=2.59>2

Above illustration is from Justin Freitag, January 24, 2020 report

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

FEA STRESS RESULT

6

Page 7: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 2 Stress MPaSF=355/155=2.29

(Just before to rotate)

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20207

Page 8: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020

Two corner points

One point

Position 3 Stress (MPa)SF=355/119 .19> 2

Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20208

Page 9: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 4 Vertical stress (MPa); SF=355/109.1>>2Finished 1st rotation (from Horizontal to Vertical)

F=31840 N=3249 Kg

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20209

Page 10: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 4 Vertical stress (MPa); SF=355/109.1>>2Finished 1st rotation (from Horizontal to Vertical)

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202010

Page 11: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 5 stress MPa; SF=355/122>>2 (Second rotation)

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202011

Page 12: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 6 Stress (MPa);SF=355/136>2(Just before the yellow sling to be picked up )

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202012

Page 13: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Position 7 Stress (MPa)SF=355/124>>2

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202013

Page 14: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax Combine force Sy Su Sa

3.20 2.26 80.00 31.80 86.40 38.20 756.48 696362.60 186966.49 883329.09 47.23 355.00 470 235

absorber Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 2362.83 -379.05 -183.64 32262.48 116356.44 -65612.42 0.24 3.16 2.00 11.89 3.51 14.13 6.67 18.25 19.45

2.00 925.65 34.23 -58.02 5124.16 51015.98 3812.87 0.08 1.22 0.32 5.21 0.20 5.61 1.43 6.13 57.93

3.00 2290.47 356.49 -213.15 3918.29 111319.22 57474.44 0.28 3.06 0.24 11.37 3.07 11.90 6.14 15.95 22.25

4.00 2619.95 187.83 176.65 32023.23 -124420.65 -48150.49 0.23 3.47 1.99 -12.71 2.57 -10.49 6.05 14.82 23.95

5.00 800.30 -25.23 -0.75 4338.11 -46906.32 3054.12 0.00 1.06 0.27 -4.79 0.16 -4.52 1.22 4.99 71.11

6.00 2541.07 -152.60 287.06 -211.25 -111217.79 36098.92 0.38 3.37 -0.01 -11.36 1.93 -11.00 5.30 14.32 24.79

7.00 1957.98 362.94 -184.54 29659.31 -99773.77 -58138.58 0.24 2.63 1.84 -10.19 3.11 -8.11 5.74 12.83 27.67

8.00 488.75 -12.81 131.91 2317.57 -11263.05 1941.08 0.17 0.65 0.14 -1.15 0.10 -0.83 0.75 1.54 230.07

9.00 1974.86 -358.09 -224.78 285.63 -98673.23 55679.04 0.30 2.65 0.02 -10.08 2.98 -9.77 5.63 13.80 25.72

10.00 2122.59 -158.50 190.39 26492.99 101017.17 -40718.47 0.25 2.81 1.64 10.32 2.18 12.21 4.99 14.96 23.72

11.00 445.99 8.47 401.54 2188.83 14174.32 1901.71 0.53 0.59 0.14 1.45 0.10 2.11 0.69 2.43 146.08

12.00 2124.17 131.16 288.98 -1390.38 94385.06 33473.81 0.38 2.81 -0.09 9.64 1.79 9.94 4.60 12.74 27.86

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax

diagnal 3.20 2.26 24.15 31.80 28.67 36.32 273.64 34046.45 49815.70 83862.14 23.14

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 1350.56 -662.96 -43.59 20764.97 62017.60 -38991.06 0.16 5.50 11.08 22.61 10.76 33.85 16.26 44.03 8.06

2.00 1192.64 704.06 105.10 -20509.72 56748.70 34131.59 0.38 5.06 10.94 20.69 9.42 32.02 14.48 40.67 8.73

3.00 1159.80 912.51 128.55 -18516.29 44280.42 -19752.49 0.47 5.39 9.88 16.14 5.45 26.49 10.84 32.47 10.93

4.00 1207.09 -898.73 145.27 16893.97 44617.25 20361.13 0.53 5.50 9.01 16.27 5.62 25.81 11.12 32.20 11.02

5.00 1571.30 -1460.81 -11.78 -25191.34 -59505.39 -41471.33 0.04 7.84 13.44 21.70 11.44 35.18 19.28 48.51 7.32

6.00 1598.74 1493.38 36.78 26847.63 -63074.30 40743.08 0.13 8.00 14.32 23.00 11.24 37.45 19.24 50.13 7.08

7.00 950.96 659.72 -158.01 17996.18 -45643.28 -15494.31 0.58 4.23 9.60 16.64 4.28 26.82 8.50 30.60 11.60

8.00 876.75 -725.91 14.58 -18501.06 -46826.69 19543.27 0.05 4.16 9.87 17.07 5.39 27.00 9.55 31.66 11.21

top section of beam lifting

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DZ1 DY2 DZ2 AREA IZZ IYY IXX Rmax

3.2 2.2624 62.285 50.8 66.8098 55.3248 532.1608 351962.76 262352.1121 614314.8739 43.3716 SF

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sx_n Sy+Sz_s Smz_n Smy_n Smx_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1 -15150.53 10911.00 25.77 -1687.64 7775.42 2869.80 28.47 20.50 0.27 0.82 0.12 29.56 20.62 46.37 7.66

2 -15616.79 -11259.76 27.90 -4005.30 10783.18 -220.91 29.35 21.16 0.02 1.14 0.28 30.50 21.44 48.06 7.39

3 493.45 370.73 32.70 1678.50 -2133.93 6598.43 0.93 0.70 0.63 0.23 0.12 1.78 0.82 2.27 156.13

4 -20.99 33.24 23.12 -3290.00 -1150.49 10045.53 0.04 0.08 0.95 0.12 0.23 1.11 0.31 1.24 287.31

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax

Vertical 3.20 2.26 63.50 31.80 68.02 36.32 451.69 274321.53 101537.40 375858.92 38.56

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 1528.07 191.82 -1567.77 7116.42 -43164.26 76936.65 5.73 5.63 3.80 15.74 21.23 25.26 26.86 52.93 6.71

2.00 1488.87 -324.49 235.90 9772.77 -65458.94 -78614.24 0.86 5.57 5.21 23.87 21.69 29.94 27.26 55.91 6.35

3.00 1289.66 160.19 -1392.81 19727.50 -29476.86 115943.10 5.09 4.75 10.52 10.75 31.99 26.36 36.74 68.88 5.15

4.00 1370.41 -395.85 -183.95 -10814.17 -52893.22 -123381.91 0.67 5.21 5.77 19.28 34.04 25.73 39.26 72.70 4.88

5.00 1531.25 -513.36 -1815.05 21828.98 41452.99 89856.23 6.63 5.90 11.64 15.11 24.79 33.39 30.70 62.78 5.65

6.00 1544.98 725.83 -200.74 -11282.29 69041.45 -91115.84 0.73 6.24 6.02 25.17 25.14 31.92 31.38 63.03 5.63

7.00 1186.09 -160.67 -1215.91 7177.40 30979.19 95417.73 4.44 4.37 3.83 11.29 26.33 19.57 30.70 56.66 6.27

8.00 1225.37 422.28 212.37 9330.60 47901.69 -99574.91 0.78 4.74 4.98 17.46 27.47 23.22 32.21 60.43 5.87

top section thicker plate

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DZ1 DY2 DZ2 AREA IZZ IYY IXX Rmax

3.20 2.26 200.00 38.10 204.52 42.62 1118.30 0.00 0.00

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sx_shear Sy+Sz_s Smz_n Smy_n Smx_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 31848.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.48 49.33 7.20

Weld stress at the vertical position

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202014

Page 15: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax Combine force Sy Su Sa

3.20 2.26 80.00 31.80 86.40 38.20 756.48 696362.60 186966.49 883329.09 47.23 355.00 470 235

absorber Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 2362.83 -379.05 -183.64 32262.48 116356.44 -65612.42 0.24 3.16 2.00 11.89 3.51 14.13 6.67 18.25 19.45

2.00 925.65 34.23 -58.02 5124.16 51015.98 3812.87 0.08 1.22 0.32 5.21 0.20 5.61 1.43 6.13 57.93

3.00 2290.47 356.49 -213.15 3918.29 111319.22 57474.44 0.28 3.06 0.24 11.37 3.07 11.90 6.14 15.95 22.25

4.00 2619.95 187.83 176.65 32023.23 -124420.65 -48150.49 0.23 3.47 1.99 -12.71 2.57 -10.49 6.05 14.82 23.95

5.00 800.30 -25.23 -0.75 4338.11 -46906.32 3054.12 0.00 1.06 0.27 -4.79 0.16 -4.52 1.22 4.99 71.11

6.00 2541.07 -152.60 287.06 -211.25 -111217.79 36098.92 0.38 3.37 -0.01 -11.36 1.93 -11.00 5.30 14.32 24.79

7.00 1957.98 362.94 -184.54 29659.31 -99773.77 -58138.58 0.24 2.63 1.84 -10.19 3.11 -8.11 5.74 12.83 27.67

8.00 488.75 -12.81 131.91 2317.57 -11263.05 1941.08 0.17 0.65 0.14 -1.15 0.10 -0.83 0.75 1.54 230.07

9.00 1974.86 -358.09 -224.78 285.63 -98673.23 55679.04 0.30 2.65 0.02 -10.08 2.98 -9.77 5.63 13.80 25.72

10.00 2122.59 -158.50 190.39 26492.99 101017.17 -40718.47 0.25 2.81 1.64 10.32 2.18 12.21 4.99 14.96 23.72

11.00 445.99 8.47 401.54 2188.83 14174.32 1901.71 0.53 0.59 0.14 1.45 0.10 2.11 0.69 2.43 146.08

12.00 2124.17 131.16 288.98 -1390.38 94385.06 33473.81 0.38 2.81 -0.09 9.64 1.79 9.94 4.60 12.74 27.86

Absorber has 12 weld connections

Weld stress at the vertical position

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

BTH equation (3-37)

> 2.4 (per ASME BTH -1 requirement)

15

Page 16: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Diagnal beam connection

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax

diagnal 3.20 2.26 24.15 31.80 28.67 36.32 273.64 34046.45 49815.70 83862.14 23.14

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 1350.56 -662.96 -43.59 20764.97 62017.60 -38991.06 0.16 5.50 11.08 22.61 10.76 33.85 16.26 44.03 8.06

2.00 1192.64 704.06 105.10 -20509.72 56748.70 34131.59 0.38 5.06 10.94 20.69 9.42 32.02 14.48 40.67 8.73

3.00 1159.80 912.51 128.55 -18516.29 44280.42 -19752.49 0.47 5.39 9.88 16.14 5.45 26.49 10.84 32.47 10.93

4.00 1207.09 -898.73 145.27 16893.97 44617.25 20361.13 0.53 5.50 9.01 16.27 5.62 25.81 11.12 32.20 11.02

5.00 1571.30 -1460.81 -11.78 -25191.34 -59505.39 -41471.33 0.04 7.84 13.44 21.70 11.44 35.18 19.28 48.51 7.32

6.00 1598.74 1493.38 36.78 26847.63 -63074.30 40743.08 0.13 8.00 14.32 23.00 11.24 37.45 19.24 50.13 7.08

7.00 950.96 659.72 -158.01 17996.18 -45643.28 -15494.31 0.58 4.23 9.60 16.64 4.28 26.82 8.50 30.60 11.60

8.00 876.75 -725.91 14.58 -18501.06 -46826.69 19543.27 0.05 4.16 9.87 17.07 5.39 27.00 9.55 31.66 11.21

Weld stress at the vertical position

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202016

> 2.4 (per ASME BTH -1 requirement)

Page 17: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Connection at the vertical beam

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DX1 DY2 DX2 AREA IXX IYY IZZ Rmax

Vertical 3.20 2.26 63.50 31.80 68.02 36.32 451.69 274321.53 101537.40 375858.92 38.56

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sz_n Sy+Sx_s Smx_n Smy_n Smz_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 1528.07 191.82 -1567.77 7116.42 -43164.26 76936.65 5.73 5.63 3.80 15.74 21.23 25.26 26.86 52.93 6.71

2.00 1488.87 -324.49 235.90 9772.77 -65458.94 -78614.24 0.86 5.57 5.21 23.87 21.69 29.94 27.26 55.91 6.35

3.00 1289.66 160.19 -1392.81 19727.50 -29476.86 115943.10 5.09 4.75 10.52 10.75 31.99 26.36 36.74 68.88 5.15

4.00 1370.41 -395.85 -183.95 -10814.17 -52893.22 -123381.91 0.67 5.21 5.77 19.28 34.04 25.73 39.26 72.70 4.88

5.00 1531.25 -513.36 -1815.05 21828.98 41452.99 89856.23 6.63 5.90 11.64 15.11 24.79 33.39 30.70 62.78 5.65

6.00 1544.98 725.83 -200.74 -11282.29 69041.45 -91115.84 0.73 6.24 6.02 25.17 25.14 31.92 31.38 63.03 5.63

7.00 1186.09 -160.67 -1215.91 7177.40 30979.19 95417.73 4.44 4.37 3.83 11.29 26.33 19.57 30.70 56.66 6.27

8.00 1225.37 422.28 212.37 9330.60 47901.69 -99574.91 0.78 4.74 4.98 17.46 27.47 23.22 32.21 60.43 5.87

Weld stress at the vertical position

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202017

> 2.4 (per ASME BTH-1 requirement)

Page 18: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Connection at the top

top section of beam lifting

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DZ1 DY2 DZ2 AREA IZZ IYY IXX Rmax

3.2 2.2624 62.285 50.8 66.8098 55.3248 532.1608 351962.76 262352.1121 614314.8739 43.3716

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sx_n Sy+Sz_s Smz_n Smy_n Smx_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1 -15150.53 10911.00 25.77 -1687.64 7775.42 2869.80 28.47 20.50 0.27 0.82 0.12 29.56 20.62 46.37 7.66

2 -15616.79 -11259.76 27.90 -4005.30 10783.18 -220.91 29.35 21.16 0.02 1.14 0.28 30.50 21.44 48.06 7.39

3 493.45 370.73 32.70 1678.50 -2133.93 6598.43 0.93 0.70 0.63 0.23 0.12 1.78 0.82 2.27 156.13

4 -20.99 33.24 23.12 -3290.00 -1150.49 10045.53 0.04 0.08 0.95 0.12 0.23 1.11 0.31 1.24 287.31

top section thicker plate

Weld SIZE width effective width DY1 DZ1 DY2 DZ2 AREA IZZ IYY IXX Rmax

3.20 2.26 200.00 38.10 204.52 42.62 1118.30 0.00 0.00

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) Sx_shear Sy+Sz_s Smz_n Smy_n Smx_s Sn_sub S_shear Scombined SF

1.00 31848.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.48 49.33 7.20

Weld stress at the vertical position

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

SF>>2.4 required by ASME BTH-1

18

Page 19: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Comments/Discussion

• The shipping frame itself looks very adequate to satisfy the

BTH requirement.

• The weld design between the thicker plate (50 mm) and the

thin tubing wall(3.2 mm) needs to be refined and addressed

properly to meet the ASME BTH-1 requirement. It is working in

progress among the group members (George, Peter and

others).

• Looking into attachment plate connection.

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202019

Page 20: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Attachment Plate

Connection Study _ Part IIAng Lee

March 19, 2020

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202020

Page 21: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Attachment Plate

Connection area

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

M16 to M20 adaptor

79.6x50.8x12.7 mm SS 304 plate welded to APA tubing

M16 bolt SS 304(per Peter Sutcliffe)

Thread connection

Thread connection

21

Page 22: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Sketch from

NP79-01-03

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202022

Page 23: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

GRAVITY LOAD IS HOLD BY THESE TWO PLATE_ LOWER SECTION

1 G load

1 G load =7659 N for one APA frame weight

6 absorber plates:Each of them is connected by THREEE springs with Kx, Ky and Kz , provided by Jake and Dan (PSL). THANK YOU!The spring stiffness is as follows:

X = 726 kN/mY = 726 kN/mZ = 2.742 MN/m

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

Top bracket is a “SLIP JOINT_SLIDING

23

Page 24: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

The deflection of APA frame is about 4.5-2.5=~2 mm The vertical tubing has moved downward 1.66~1.9 mm (more like translation due to the spring attachment).It is consistent with X=7659 N/(726e3*6)=~1.75 mm (Good agreement !)

24

Page 25: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

The FEA model indicates the stress is below ~125 Mpa << 355 MPa

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202025

Page 26: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

Check the weld stress

W

e

l

d

S

I

Z

E

widtheffective

widthDX1 DZ1 DX2 DZ2 AREA IZZ IXX IYY Rmax

3.20 2.26 62.29 38.10 66.81 42.62 474.70 292083.22 144104.52 436187.74 39.62

Fx Fy Fz Mx My Mz (MPa) SY_nSx+Sz_

sSmz_n Smy_S Smx_N Sn_sub S_shear

Scombin

edSF

1

.

0

0

-2.53 -4130.60 -77.65 532030.00 -1347.90 53473.00 8.70 0.16 6.12 0.12 78.68 93.50 0.29 93.50 3.80

2

.

0

0

-10.71 -3554.30 -68.19 468380.00 6140.90 -99012.00 7.49 0.15 11.32 0.56 69.27 88.08 0.70 88.09 4.03

26

Page 27: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

SS 304 Syield=205 MPa minSu=515 MPa min

M16X2 Bolt stress (MPa) SF=205/73=2.82

Adaptor (MPa) SF=205/72=2.85

27

Page 28: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 2020

S355 carbon steelSyield=355 MPa min

Attachment plate S355; SF=355/88.68=4

28

Page 29: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

DYNAMICS AND MODAL ANALYSIS

FOR APA FRAME

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202029

Page 30: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

APA Frame _Modal Analysis

From “Design recommendations for APA transport frame and detector” by M. ZIMBRU, J-L. GRENARD, O. BELTRAMELLO (CERN)

APA Shipping Box Update (17-03-2020) :

The dynamic analyses of the APA detector inside the APA frame should be analysed in 3 steps

1. Modal analysis:

A modal analysis is required to check the decoupling of the APA detector and the APA frame.

Required:

• Eigenfrequencies + principal modal masses in the 3 directions of the APA detectors constrained at his interface with the APA frame.

The calculation should be run from 0 to 100 Hz or at least until we reach 90 % of the total mass.

• Eigenfrequencies + principal modal masses in the 3 directions of the APA frame + attenuator constrained at his interface with the truck. APA mass is modelled as asingle mass at COG.

The calculation should be run from 0 to 100 Hz or at least until we reach 90 % of the total mass.

• Eigenfrequencies + principal modal masses in the 3 directions of the APA frame + attenuator + APA detector constrained at his interface with the truck.

The calculation should be run from 0 to 100 Hz or at least until we reach 90 % of the total mass.

The attenuator stiffness in all 3 direction are mandatory for these analyses.

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202030

Page 31: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

APA Frame _FEA model (loading and boundary condition)

FEA mass reaction =576.6 kg (~99.7%)

Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20203/30/2020

1 G

Information provided by Daniel Wenman (PSL)

31

Page 32: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

APA Frame _Modal Analysis _Model A

Mode 1 fn=11.76 Hz (in/out) mode shape is mostly perpendicular to the frame.

RATIO EFF. MASS TO TOTAL MASS

MODEFREQUENCY

(HZ)X Y Z

1 11.7861 2.00E-09 4.01E-06 0.387169

2 16.6865 1.28E-07 4.45E-01 3.54E-08

3 16.9827 4.82E-09 8.86352E-06 4.82E-06

4 28.7198 3.44E-08 3.03E-06 2.42E-01

5 34.5217 3.16E-08 6.96E-06 0.0339109

6 38.8151 9.22E-06 9.01E-07 3.85E-02

7 40.7882 3.80E-07 4.97E-03 3.35E-05

8 41.4788 4.15E-07 2.01E-07 6.35E-06

9 45.1899 7.82E-05 3.99E-07 6.54E-02

10 50.7935 0.443764 6.50E-07 4.68E-06

11 59.3438 6.61E-07 8.60E-06 7.53E-03

12 63.6246 2.27E-06 2.17E-05 1.02E-02

13 64.2536 3.35E-08 1.78E-01 3.92E-07

14 66.4298 7.05E-07 3.62E-08 2.01E-08

15 78.1044 1.25E-07 1.10E-01 1.49E-07

16 81.0604 5.13E-08 1.70E-08 7.05E-07

17 88.458 4.12E-07 3.07E-07 5.39E-02

18 92.9942 2.37E-08 1.83E-07 2.43E-03

19 97.8719 3.67E-08 0.164955 3.76E-07

20 109.005 2.28E-10 6.81E-09 3.47E-02

21 114.115 3.93E-09 7.74E-04 1.21E-08

22 117.425 2.58E-08 6.55E-09 2.44E-07

23 132.484 9.66E-08 2.90E-09 6.96E-08

24 133.261 4.58E-08 2.77E-08 2.91E-07

25 139.231 2.12E-08 1.91E-08 1.37E-02

26 156.431 3.36E-07 3.86E-07 5.02E-08

27 165.545 6.18E-07 2.42E-05 6.82E-08

28 165.731 7.75E-12 1.65E-02 6.06E-07

29 169.65 9.34E-08 4.15E-07 2.63E-02

30 185.552 7.58E-04 1.43E-08 3.22E-06

----- --------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------

sum 0.444616 0.920486 0.915319

Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20203/30/202032

Page 33: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

APA Frame _Modal Analysis _Model A

Mode 3 fn=16.9827 Hz. mode shape mostly is in twist motion.

RATIO EFF. MASS TO TOTAL MASS

MODEFREQUENCY

(HZ)X Y Z

1 11.7861 2.00E-09 4.01E-06 0.387169

2 16.6865 1.28E-07 4.45E-01 3.54E-08

3 16.9827 4.82E-09 8.86352E-06 4.82E-06

4 28.7198 3.44E-08 3.03E-06 2.42E-01

5 34.5217 3.16E-08 6.96E-06 0.0339109

6 38.8151 9.22E-06 9.01E-07 3.85E-02

7 40.7882 3.80E-07 4.97E-03 3.35E-05

8 41.4788 4.15E-07 2.01E-07 6.35E-06

9 45.1899 7.82E-05 3.99E-07 6.54E-02

10 50.7935 0.443764 6.50E-07 4.68E-06

11 59.3438 6.61E-07 8.60E-06 7.53E-03

12 63.6246 2.27E-06 2.17E-05 1.02E-02

13 64.2536 3.35E-08 1.78E-01 3.92E-07

14 66.4298 7.05E-07 3.62E-08 2.01E-08

15 78.1044 1.25E-07 1.10E-01 1.49E-07

16 81.0604 5.13E-08 1.70E-08 7.05E-07

17 88.458 4.12E-07 3.07E-07 5.39E-02

18 92.9942 2.37E-08 1.83E-07 2.43E-03

19 97.8719 3.67E-08 0.164955 3.76E-07

20 109.005 2.28E-10 6.81E-09 3.47E-02

21 114.115 3.93E-09 7.74E-04 1.21E-08

22 117.425 2.58E-08 6.55E-09 2.44E-07

23 132.484 9.66E-08 2.90E-09 6.96E-08

24 133.261 4.58E-08 2.77E-08 2.91E-07

25 139.231 2.12E-08 1.91E-08 1.37E-02

26 156.431 3.36E-07 3.86E-07 5.02E-08

27 165.545 6.18E-07 2.42E-05 6.82E-08

28 165.731 7.75E-12 1.65E-02 6.06E-07

29 169.65 9.34E-08 4.15E-07 2.63E-02

30 185.552 7.58E-04 1.43E-08 3.22E-06

----- --------------- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------

sum 0.444616 0.920486 0.915319

Mode 2: fn=16.686 Hz (up/down).The mode shape is mostly parallel (in plane) to the frame.

Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 20203/30/2020

THESE RESULTS WILL BE PART OF IMPUT INFORMATION FOR THE AVM VENDOR TO DESIGN A SUITABLE SHOCK ABSORBER

33

Page 34: FEA Summery Report - INDICO-FNAL (Indico) · FEA Summery Report (APA Consortium Meeting on March 30, 2020) Ang Lee March 30, 2020 1 3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium

Summery/Discussion

• We’ve done a lot of FEA analysis works in a short period of the time.

• Results so far indicates that APA shipping frame is well designed in terms of the

its structural strength per ASME BTH requirement.

• The analysis work will be continuously iterated/updated as the current design

progressing (ex: once the shock absorber is defined; the weldment around the

thick/thin plates has been finalized; and others modifications needed).

• It is truly a TEAM WORK! Thank You All!

3/30/2020 Ang Lee FEA Summery for APA Consortium Meeting March 30 202034