fea plane stress analysis
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
1/17
Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 101
6 PlaneStressAnalysis6.1 IntroductionGenerally
you
will
be
forced
to
utilize
the
solid
elements
in
SW
Simulation
due
to
acomplicated
solid
geometry. Tolearnhowtoutilizelocalmeshcontrolfortheelementsitisusefultoreviewsometwo
dimensional(2D)problemsemployingthemembranetriangularelements. Historically,2Danalytic
applicationsweredevelopedtorepresent,orbound,someclassicsolidobjects. Thosespecialcasesinclude
planestressanalysis,planestrainanalysis,axisymmetricanalysis,flatplateanalysis,andgeneralshellanalysis.
Aftercompletingthefollowing2Dapproximationyoushouldgobackandsolvethemuchlarger3Dversionof
theproblemandverifythatyougetessentiallythesameresultsforboththestressesanddeflections.
Planestressanalysisisthe2Dstressstatethatisusuallycoveredinundergraduatecoursesonmechanicsof
materials. Itisbasedonathinflatobjectthatisloaded,andsupportedinasingleflatplane. Thestresses
normaltotheplanearezero(butnotthestrain). Therearetwonormalstressesandoneshearstress
componentateachpoint(x, y,and). Thedisplacementvectorhastwotranslationalcomponents(u_x,and
u_y).Therefore,
any
load
(point,
line,
or
area)
has
two
corresponding
components.
TheSWSimulationshellelementscanbeusedforplanestressanalysis. However,onlytheirinplane,or
membrane,behaviorisutilized. Thatmeansthatonlytheelementsinplanedisplacementsareactive. The
generalshellinplanerotationvectorsarenotusedforplanestressstudiesandshouldberestrained. To
createsuchastudyyouneedtoconstructthe2Dshapeeitherasasheetmetalpart,aplanarsurface(InsertSurfacePlanarsurface),orextrudeitasasolidpartwithaconstantthicknessthatissmallcomparedtotheothertwodimensionsofthepart. Asolidislaterconvertedtoashellmodelbycreatingamidsurfaceoran
offsetsurfacewithinthesolid.
Beforesolidelementsbecameeasytogenerateitwasnotunusualtomodelsomeshapesas2.5D. Thatis,
theywereplanestressinnaturebuthadregionsofdifferentconstantthickness. Thisconceptcanbeusefulin
validatingtheresultsofasolidstudyifyouhavenoanalyticapproximationtouse. Sincethemidsurfaceshells
extracttheir
thickness
automatically
from
the
solid
body
you
should
use
amid
plane
extrude
when
you
are
buildingsuchapart.
Oneuseofaplanestressmodelhereistoillustratethenumberofelementsthatareneededthroughthe
depthofaregion,whichismainlyinastateofbending,inordertocaptureagoodapproximationofthe
flexuralstresses. Elementarybeamtheoryand2Delasticitytheorybothshowthatthelongitudinalnormal
stress(x)varieslinearlythroughthedepth. Forpurebendingitistensionatonedepthextreme,compression
attheother,andzeroatthecenterofitsdepth(alsoknownastheneutralaxis).Whenthebendingisdue,in
part,toatransverseforcethentheshearstress()ismaximumattheneutralaxisandzeroatthetopand
bottomfibers. Forarectangularcrosssectiontheshearstressvariesparabolicallythroughthedepth. Since
theelementstressesarediscontinuousattheirinterfaces,youwillneedatleastthreeofthequadratic(6
node)membranetriangles,oraboutfiveofthelinear(3node)membranetrianglestogetareasonablespatial
approximationof
the
parabolic
shear
stress.
This
concept
should
guide
you
in
applying
mesh
control
through
thedepthofaregionyouexpect,orfind,tobeinastateofbending.
6.2 SimplysupportedbeamAsimplerectangularbeamplanestressanalysiswillbeillustratedhere.Considerabeamofrectangularcross
sectionwithathicknessoft=2cm,adepthofh=10cm,andalengthofL=100cm. Letauniformly
distributeddownwardverticalloadofw=100N/cmbeappliedatitstopsurfaceandletbothendsbesimply
supported(i.e.,haveu_y=0attheneutralaxis)byarollersupport. Inaddition,bothendsaresubjectedto
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
2/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 102
equalmomentsthateachdisplacesthebeamcenterdownwards. TheendmomenthasavalueofM=1.25e3
Nm.Thematerialisaluminum1060. Thisisaproblemwherethestressesdependonlyonthegeometry.
However,thedeflectionsalwaysdependonthematerialtype.
Figure61 Asimplysupportedbeamwithlineloadandendmoments
Itshouldbeclearthatthisproblemissymmetricalabouttheverticalcenterline(whythatistruewillbe
explainedshortlyshoulditnotbeclear). Therefore,nomorethanhalfthebeamneedstobeconsidered(and
halftheload). Selecttherighthalf. Thebeamtheoryresultsshouldsuggestthatanevenmoresimplified
modelwouldbevalidduetoantisymmetry(ifweassumehalfthelineloadactsonboththetopandbottom
faces). The3Dflatfacesymmetryrestraintwasdescribedearlier. The2Dnatureofthisexampleprovides
insightintohowtoidentifylines(orplanesin3D)ofsymmetryandantisymmetry,asshowninFigure62.
Figure62 Onequarterofthebeam
6.2.1 SymmetryandantisymmetryrestraintsAprocessforidentifyingdisplacementrestraintsonplanesofsymmetryandantisymmetrywillbeoutlined
here. Assumethatthehorizontalcenterlineofthebeamcorrespondstothe
Antisymmetric,ub= ua Symmetric,vb=va
Figure63 Antisymmetric(u=0,v=?),andsymmetric(u=?,v=0)displacementstates
dashedcenterlineoftheantisymmetricimageattheleftinFigure63. Thequestionis,what,ifany,restraint
shouldbeappliedtotheuorvdisplacementcomponentonthatline. Toresolvethatquestionimaginetwo
mirrorimagepoints,aandb,eachadistance,,aboveandbelowthedashedline. Notethatboththeupper
andlowerhalfportionsareloadeddownwardinanidenticalfashion,andtheyhavethesamehorizontalend
supports. Therefore,youexpectvaandvbtobeequal,buthaveanunknownvalue(sayva=vb=?). Likewise,
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
3/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 103
thehorizontalloadapplicationisequalinmagnitude,butofoppositesignintheupperandlowerregions.
Therefore,youexpectub= ua. Nowletthedistancebetweenthepointsgotozero(0). Thelimitgivesv=
va=vb=?,sovisunknownandnorestraintisappliedtoit. Thelimitonthehorizontaldisplacementgivesu=
ub= ua0,sothehorizontaldisplacementcanberestrainedtozeroifyouwithtouseahalfdepthanti
symmetricmodel. Anotherwaytosaythatis:onalineorplaneofantisymmetrythetangential
displacementcomponent(s)isrestrainedtozero. Forashellorbeamtherotationalcomponentnormaltoan
antisymmetry
plane
is
also
zero.
Theverticalcenterlinesymmetrycanbejustifiedinasimilarway. ImaginethattherightimageinFigure63is
rotated90degreesclockwisesothedashedlineisparalleltothebeamverticalsymmetryline. Nowu
representsthedisplacementcomponenttangenttothebeamcenterline(i.e.,vertical). Theverticalloadingon
bothsidesisthesame,asaretheverticalendsupports,sotheverticalmotionataandbwillbethesame(say
ua=ub=?). Inthelimit,asthetwopointsapproacheachotheru=ua=ub=?,sothebeamverticalcenterline
hasanunknowntangentialdisplacementandisnotsubjecttoarestraint. Nowconsiderthedisplacement
normaltothebeamverticalcenterline(herev). Atanyspecifieddepth,theloadingsanddeflectionsinthat
directionareequalandopposite. Therefore,inthelimitasthetwopointsapproacheachotheru=ub= ua
0,sothedisplacementcomponentnormaltothebeamverticalcenterlinemustvanish. Anotherwaytostate
thatis:onalineorplaneofsymmetrythenormaldisplacementcomponentisrestrainedtozero.Forashell
orbeam
the
rotational
components
parallel
to
asymmetry
plane
are
also
zero.
6.2.2 Beamloadcase1,momentloadingsFromtheabovearguments,the2Dapproximationcanbereducedtoonequarteroftheoriginaldomain. The
othermaterialisremovedandreplacedbytherestraintsthattheyimposeontheportionthatremains. Now
yourattentioncanfocusontheappliedloadstates. Thetop(andbottom)lineloadcanbereplacedeither
withatotalforceonthetopsurface,oranequivalentpressureonthetopsurface,sinceSWSimulationdoes
notofferaloadperunitlengthoption. Unfortunately,eitherrequiresahandcalculationthatmightintroduce
anerror. Thelessobviousquestionishowtoapplytheendmoment(s).
Sincethegeneralshellelementhasbeenforcedtolieinaflatplane,andhavenoloadsnormaltotheplane,its
twoinplanerotationalDOFwillbeidenticallyzero. However,thenodalrotationsnormaltotheplanearestill
active(intheliteraturetheyarecalldrillingfreedomsin2Dstudies). Thatmaymakeyouthinkthatyoucould
applyamoment,Mz,atanodeontheneutralaxisofeachendofthebeam. Intheory,thatshouldbepossible,
butinpracticeitworkspoorly(tryit)andtheendmomentshouldbeappliedinadifferentfashion. Oneeasy
waytoapplyamomentistoformacouplebyapplyingequalpositiveandnegativetriangularpressuresacross
thedepthoftheendsofthebeam. Thatapproachworksequallywellfor3Dsolidsthatdonothaverotational
degreesoffreedom.
Themaximumrequiredpressureisrelatedtothedesiredmomentbysimplestaticequilibrium. Theresultant
horizontalforceforalinearpressurevariationfromzerotopmaxisF=Apmax/2,whereAisthecorresponding
rectangulararea,A=t(h/2),soF=thpmax/4. Thatresultantforceoccursatthecentroidofthepressure
loading,soitsleverarmwithrespecttotheneutralaxisisd=2(h/2)/3=h/3(forthetopandbottomportions).
The
pair
of
equal
and
opposite
forces
form
a
combined
couple
of
Mz
=
F
(2d)
=
t
h
2
pmax
/
6.
Finally,
the
requiredmaximumpressureis pmax=6Mz/th2.
ToapplythispressuredistributioninSWSimulationyoumustdefinealocalcoordinatesystemlocatedatthe
neutralaxisofthebeamanduseittodefineavariablepressure. However,theSWSimulationnonuniform
pressuredatarequiresapressurescale,pscale,timesanondimensionalfunctionofaselectedlocalcoordinate
system. Hereyouwillassumeapressureloadlinearlyvaryingwithlocalyplacedattheneutralaxis:p(y)=
pscale*y(withynondimensional). Thismustmatchpmaxaty=h/2,so
pscale =2pmax/h=12Mz/th3.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
4/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 104
Sinceitisoftennecessarytoapplymomentstosolidsinthisfashionthismomentloadingwillbechecked
independentlyagainstbeamtheoryestimatesbeforeapplyingthelineload.Here,pmax=3.75e7N/m2,pscale =
7.5e8.
6.2.3 SWSimulationplanestressmodelThebeamtheorysolutionforasimplysupportedbeamwithauniformloadiswellknown,asisthesolutionfor
theloading
by
two
end
moments
(called
pure
bending).
In
both
cases
the
maximum
deflection
occurs
at
the
beammidspan. Thetwovaluesarevmax=5wL4/384EI,andvmax=ML
2/8EI,respectively. Herethe
centerlinedeflectiondueonlytotheendmomentisvmax=1.36e3m. Foralinearanalysisandthesumof
thesetwovaluescanbeusedtovalidatethecenterlinedeflection. Next,theonequartermodel,shownin
Figure62,willbebuilt,restrained,andloaded:
1. BuildtherectanglesketchandconvertittoaplanarsurfaceviaInsertSurfacePlanarSurfaceandselecttheCurrentSketchasthePlanarSurface.
2. Startanewstudyusingashellmesh:Simulation
New
StudyStatic
.NameitAntisymmbeam.
3. UsePartEditDefinitiontosettheelementTypetoThin,andtheShellThicknesstobe0.02m. AlsousePart Apply/EditMaterialtoselectthelibrarymaterialof1060aluminum.
Sincethestressesthroughthedepthofthebeamaregoingtobeexaminedhere,youshouldplanaheadand
insertsomesplitlinesonthefrontsurfacetobeusedtolistand/orgraphselectedstressanddeflection
components:
1. Rightclickonthefrontface,InsertSketch.2. Insertalinesegmentthatcrossesthefaceattheinteriorquarterpoints.Includingtheendlines,fivegraphingsectionswillbeavailable. Alsoaddarightcornerarcfortheverticalsupportedge.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
5/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 105
3. InsertCurveSplitLineselectthebodyfaces,clickOK.
6.2.4 EdgerestraintsandloadsRememberthatshellsdefinedbyplanarsurfacesmusthavetheirrestraintsandloadsapplieddirectlytothe
edgesoftheselectedsurface. Firstthesymmetryandantisymmetryrestraintswillbeapplied. Sincetheshell
meshwillbeflatitiseasytouseitsedgestodefinedirectionsforloads,orrestraints:
1. RightclickingonFixturesopenstheFixturepanel.2. Thezerohorizontal(x)deflectionisappliedasaverticalsymmetryconditionontheedgecorresponding
to
the
beam
centerline;
AdvancedUse
Reference
Geometry,
select
vertical
Edge1
to
restrainandhorizontalEdge2forthedirection.
3. Applytheantisymmetryconditionalongtheedgeoftheneutralaxis.Usereferencegeometry,selectthefivebottomedgesformedbythesplitlinesandEdge7forthedirection.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
6/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 106
Atthesimplysupportedenditisnecessarytoassumehowthatsupportwillbeaccomplished. Beamtheory
treatsitasapointsupport,butin2Dor3Dthatcausesafalseinfinitestressatthepoint. Anothersplitlinearc
wasintroducedsoaboutonethirdofthatendcouldbepickedtoprovidetheverticalrestraintrequired. This
servesasareminderthatwhere,andhow,partsarerestrainedisanassumption. Soitiswisetoinvestigate
morethanonesuchassumption. Softwaretutorialsareintendedtoillustratespecificfeaturesofthesoftware,
andusuallydonothavethespacefor,orintentionof,presentingthebestengineeringjudgment. Immovable
restraintsare
often
used
in
tutorials,
but
they
are
unusual
in
real
applications.
Applytherightverticalendsupportrestraint:
1. SelectFixturestoopentheFixturepanel.2. PickAdvancedUseReferenceGeometry;selectthelowerrightfrontverticaledgelinetorestrain,andtheupperverticaledgeasthedirection.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
7/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 107
6.2.5 RigidbodymotionrestraintSinceageneralshellelementisbeingusedinaplanestress(membraneshell)applicationitstillhastheability
totranslatenormaltoitsplaneandtorotateabouttheinplaneaxes(xandy). Thosethreerigidbodymotions
shouldalsobeeliminatedinanyplanestressanalysisonmostFEAsystems. Ifnothingelse,sucharestraint
avoidscalculatingthreezerovaluesateachnodeandmakesyouranalysismoreefficient. Atworst,duringthe
solvephaseyoumaygetafatalerrormessage(duetoroundofferrors):
Forgoodmodelingpracticeapplythoserestraintsvia:
1. SelectFixturestoopentheFixturepanelandpickAdvancedFixtures.2. PickSymmetry;selectthefivefrontfacesegmentsofthebeamtorestrain.ChangetheSymbolColor.Thatcompletesthesymmetry,antisymmetryandrigidbodymotionrestraintsforthismodel.
6.2.6 MomentapplicationasanonuniformpressureUnlikegeneralshells,membraneshellsdonothaveactiverotationaldegreesoffreedomthatallowforthe
directapplicationofacouple. Alinearvariationofequalandoppositepressures,relativetotheneutralaxis,
canbeusedtoapplyastaticallyequivalentmomenttoacontinuumbodythatdoesnothaverotational
degreesoffreedom. Suchaloadingalsohasthesidebenefitofmatchingthetheoreticalnormalstress
distributionin
abeam
subjected
to
astate
of
pure
bending.
A
varying
pressure
loading
usually
requires
the
usertodefinealocalcoordinatesystemattheaxisaboutwhichthemomentacts. Inthiscase,itmustbe
locatedattheneutralaxisofthebeam:
1. SelectInsertReferenceGeometryCoordinateSystemtoopentheCoordinateSystempanel.RightclickontherightendoftheneutralaxistosettheoriginofCoordinateSystem1.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
8/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 108
2. Acceptthedefaultdirectionsfortheaxesasmatchingtheglobalaxes.ToapplytheexternalmomentuseExternalLoadsPressure. TheapplicationofthenonuniformpressureisappliedatthefrontverticaledgeatthesimplesupportinthePressurepanelofFigure64. Aunitpressure
valueisusedtosettheunitsandthemagnitudeisdefinedbymultiplyingthatvaluebyanondimensional
polynomialofthespatialcoordinatesofapoint,relativetolocalCoordinateSystem1definedabove.
Figure64 Applyingtherequiredlinearpressure
6.2.7 MeshandrunthemomentstudyHavingcompletedtherestraintsandmomentloading,thedefaultnamesinthemanagermenuhavebeen
changed(byslowdoubleclicks)toreflectwhattheyareintendedtoaccomplish(leftofFigure65). Nowyou
canRunthemomentloadcasestudy.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
9/17
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
10/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 110
compressionwithastressvaluex=pmax=3.75e7N/m2. Thatseemstoagreewiththecontourrangein
Figure68andindeed,astressprobetheregivesavalueofx=3.77e7N/m2. Beamtheorygivesalinear
variation,throughthedepth,fromthatmaximumtozeroattheneutralaxis. Tocomparewiththat,agraphof
alongthequarterpointsplitlineisgiveninFigure68. Itshowsthatthesevennodesalongtheedgesofthe
threequadraticelementshavepickedupthepredictedlineargraphquitewell. Forthenextloadcaseofafull
spanlineloadtheshearstress(thatiszerohere)willbeparabolicandthecorrespondinggraphwillbeless
accuratefor
such
acrude
mesh.
Figure67HorizontalstressalongtherightL/8spansegmentanditsprobevalue
Figure68 GraphofhorizontalstressatverticallineL/8fromthesupport
6.2.9 ReactionrecoveryFor
this
first
load
case,
the
only
external
applied
load
is
the
horizontal
pressure
distribution.
It
caused
aresultantexternalhorizontalforcethatwasshownabovetobeF=18,750N. Youshouldexpectthefinite
elementreactiontobeequalandoppositeofthatexternalresultantload. CheckthatintheManagermenu:
1. RightclickResults ListResultForceReactionForcetoopenthepanelwiththereactionforces.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
11/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 111
2. Examinethehorizontal(x)reactionforceaboveandverifythatitssumis18,750N.(Thesumofthemomentsisoftenconfusingbecausetheyarecomputedwithrespecttotheoriginoftheglobalcoordinatesystem,andmostprogramsnevermentionthatfact.)
TotestyourexperiencewithSWSimulation,youshouldnowrunthisspecialcasestudyasafull3Dsolid
subjecttothesameendpressures. Youwillfindthismodelwasquiteaccurate.Whileplanning3Dmeshes
youcangetusefulinsightsbyrunninga2Dstudylikethis. Also,a2Dapproximationcanbeausefulvalidation
toolifnoanalyticresultsorexperimentalvaluesareavailable. Theycanalsobeeasiertovisualize. Ofcourse,
manyproblemsrequireafull3Dstudybut1Dor2Dstudiesalongthewayareeducational.
6.2.10Beamloadcase2,thetransverselineloadHavingvalidatedthemomentloadcase,thelineloadwillbevalidatedandthenbothloadcaseswillbe
activatedto
obtain
the
results
of
the
original
problem
statement.
First,
go
to
the
manager
menu,
right
click
on
themomentpressureloadandsuppressit. Nextyouopenanewforcecasetoaccountforthelineload.
Recallthatthelineloadtotaled10,000N. Sincetheparthasbeenreducedtoonefourth,throughtheuseof
symmetryandantisymmetry,youonlyneedtodistribute2,500Noverthismodel. Therearetwowaystodo
thatforselectedsurfaceshellformulationofanyplanestressproblem. Theyaretoapplythattotalaseithera
lineload,ortodistributeitoverthemeshfaceasatangentialsheartraction(whichisthebetterway). Figure
69(left)showstheApplyForceapproach. Thatapproachhasbeenmadelessclearbythewaythesplitlines
wereconstructed. Thetopofthebeamhasbeensplitintofoursegmentsandthismethodappliesaforceper
entity. Therefore,aresultantforceof625Nperedgesegmentisspecified. Hadthesplitlinesnothadequal
spacingyouwouldhavetomeasureeachoftheirlengthsandgothroughthisprocedurefourtimes(the
pressureapproachavoidsthatpotentialcomplication)..
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
12/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 112
Figure69 Secondbeamloadcaseofalineload
Withthissecondloadcaseinplacethestudyissimplyrunagainwiththesamerestraintsandmesh. Aseries
ofquickspotchecksoftheresultsarecarriedoutbeforemovingontothetrueproblemwherebothloadcases
areactivated.
Thebeamtheoryvalidationresult,forthislineload,predictedamaximumverticalcenterlinedeflectionofvmax
=1.13e3m. Theplanestressmaximumdeflectionwasextracted:
1. DoubleclickonPlot1underdisplacements. Thecontouredmagnitudeshowsarotationalmotionaboutthesimplesupportend,andverticaltranslationatthebeamcenterline,asexpected.
1. RightclickinthemanagermenuResultsListStress,Displacement,StraintoopentheListResultspanel. SelectDisplacementsandunderAdvancedOptionsselectAbsoluteMax,andSortbyvalue,
clickOK.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
13/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 113
2. Whenthelistappearsnotethatthemaximumdeflectionis1.16e3mattheverticalcenterlineposition. Thatisveryclosetotheinitialvalidationestimate.
Thenumericalvalueofthemaximumhorizontalfiberstresswaslistedinasimilarmanner. Themaximum
compressionvalue,inFigure610,ofx=4.04e7N/m2compareswellwiththesimplebeamtheoryvalueof
3.75e7N/m2,beingabouta7%difference. Sincethemeshissocrudethebeamstressisprobablythemost
accurateandtheplanestressvaluewillmatchitasareasonablyfinemeshisintroduced. Thepurposeofthe
crudemeshistoillustratetheneedformeshcontrolissolidsundergoingmainlyflexuralstresses. Toillustrate
thatpoint,
Figure611presentsthenormalstressandshearstress,fromtheneutralaxistothetop,attheL/4andL/8
positions.
Beamtheorysaysthenormalstressislinearwhiletheshearstressisparabolic. Thebeamtheoryshearstress
shouldbezeroatthetopfiberand,forarectangularcrosssection,hasamaximumvalueattheneutralaxisof
1.88e6N/m2. Thegraphvaluesin
Figure611showsaplanestressmaximumshearstressof1.84e6N/m2andaminimumof0.08e6N/m2atthe
quarterspansection. Thatisquitegoodagreementwithavalidationestimatefrombeamtheory.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
14/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 114
Figure610 Horizontalstresses(SX)forthelineloadcase
Figure611 Normal(SX)andshearstresses(SXY)atL/4(left)andL/8forthelineloadcase
6.3 CombinedloadcasesHavingvalidatedeachofthetwoloadcasestheyarecombinedbyunsuppressingtheendmomentcondition
(Figure612left)andrunningthestudyagainwiththesamemesh. Here,thetwosetsofpeakdeflectionsand
stressessimplyaddbecauseitisalinearanalysis. Aquickspotcheckverifiestheexpectedresults. The
reactionforcecomponentswereverified(Figure612right)beforelistingthemaximumdeflectionandfiber
stress(Figure613).
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
15/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 115
Figure612 Verifyingthemodelreactionsforthecombinedloadings
Figure613 ProbevaluesforcombinedloadingmaximumdisplacementandvonMisesstress
Whatremainstobedoneistoexaminethelikelyfailurecriteriathatcouldbeappliedtothismaterial. They
includethe
Von
Mises
effective
stress,
the
maximum
principle
shear
stress,
and
the
maximum
principle
normal
stress. TheVonMisescontourvaluesareshowninFigure614. Twicethemaximumshearstress(thestress
intensity)isgiveninthetopofFigure615,whilethebottomportiondisplaysthemaximumprinciplestress
(P3). Actually,P3iscompressiveherebutitcorrespondstothemirrorimagetensiononthebottomfiberof
theactualbeam. Allthreestressvaluesneedtobecomparedtotheyieldpointstressof2.8e7N/m2. The
arrowinthefigurehighlightswherethatfallsonthecolorbar. Allofthecriteriaexceedthatvalue,sothepart
willhavetoberevised. AtthispointfailureisdeterminedevenbeforeaFactorofSafety(FOS)hasbeen
assigned. Forductilematerials,thecommonvaluesfortheFOSrangefrom1.3to5,ormore[9,12]. Assumea
FOS=3. Thecurrentdesignisafactorofabout3.3overtheyieldstress. CombiningthatwiththeFOSmeans
thatthestressesneedtobereducedbyaboutafactorof10.
Thecrosssectionalmomentofinertia,I=th3/12,isproportionaltothethickness,t,sodoublingthethickness
cutsthe
deflections
and
stresses
in
half.
Changing
the
depth,
h,
is
more
effective
for
bending
loads.
It
reduces
thedeflectionby1/h3andthestressesbyafactorof1/(2h2). Thedesiredreductionofstressescouldbe
obtainedbyincreasingthedepthbyafactorof2.25. Theabovediscussionassumedthatbucklinghasbeen
eliminatedbyabucklinganalysis. Sincebucklingisusuallysuddenandcatastrophicitwouldrequireamuch
higherFOS.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
16/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft10.2Copyright2009. Allrightsreserved. 116
Figure614 VonMisesstressinthebeamwithalineload.
Figure615 Beamprincipalstressandmaximumshearcontours
6.3.1 AdvancedoutputoptionsTherearetimeswhenthesoftwarewillnotprovidethegraphicaloutputyoudesire. Forexample,youmay
wishtographtheplanestressdeflectionagainstexperimentallymeasureddeflections. TheSWSimulationList
Selectedfeatureforanycontouredvalueallowsthedataonselectededges,splitlines,orsurfacestobesaved
toafileinacommaseparatedvalueformat(*.csv). SuchafilecanbeopenedinanExcelspreadsheet,or
Matlab,to
be
plotted
and/or
combined
with
other
data.
To
illustrate
the
point,
when
the
beam
deflection
valueswerecontouredthebottomedgewasselectedtoplaceitsdeflectionsinatable:
1. WithadisplacementplotshowingrightclickonthePlotnameListSelected.2. Selectthefourbottomlinesofthebeam.Update.3. ThebottomofthelistingwindowhasaSummaryofthedata.
-
8/12/2019 FEA Plane Stress Analysis
17/17
PlaneStressAnalysis J.E.Akin
Draft 10.2 Copyright 2009. All rights reserved. 117
4. ThelowerReportOptionregiondoesnotincludetheGraphIcon,butdoesshowaSaveicon. Thatisbecausethepathhasmultiplelines. PickSavetohavethelisteddata(nodenumber,deflectionvalue,
andx,y,zcoordinates)tobeoutputasacommaseparatedvalues(csv)file.
5. Nameandsavethedataforuseelsewhere.
SWSimulation
did
not
offer
aplot
option
along
all
the
selected
lines
since
could
not
identify
which
item
to
sort. Youknowthatthemultiplelinesegmentsshouldbesortedbythexcoordinatevalue. Therefore,the
datawereopenedinExcel,sortedbyxcoordinate,andgraphedasdeflectionversusposition(Figure616).
Youcouldaddexperimentaldeflectionvaluestothesamefileandaddasecondcurvetothedisplayfor
comparisonpurposes.
Figure616 ExceldisplacementgraphfromsavedCSVfileforcombinedloads