fcs acquisition & evaluation teaming army test and evaluation command

FCS ACQUISITION & EVALUATION

TEAMING

Army Test and Evaluation Command

2

CoreCompl

Systems

Element LevelCap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

DecompositionRedBlue

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

MOPs/MOEs Element Level (ORD, Spec)

MOPs/MOEs FoS/SoS Level(ORD, Spec, KPP, COIC)

Mission Threads(O&O)

FCSElements(Platforms, Networks, …) MISSION

M&S

Data

TTOT

Evaluation Strategy

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim @ SoS, S, S, + Unks

Joint/Compl

Systems

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

Updated as Systems Mature

Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks

Sensitivity Analyses

By Thread

Cap/Lim @ Mission, S, S, + Unks

3

Traditional Acquisition Program

Mission

Fielded Unit

New Equipment

Effective Suitable Survivable, KPP’s COIC’s, ORD Requirements

“PROXY” Issues

Mission Capability

Exists

4

FCS Acquisition Program

Mission

New Fielded Unit

Effective Suitable Survivable, KPP’s COIC’s, ORD Requirements Capabilities

Relates To Warfighter Needs Relates To

Identified Criteria

5

ATEC’s Role

• Independent Evaluator For FCS– Develop MOEs And MOPs To Support Platform And FoS/SoS

Assessment Of:• Specs• ORD Requirements• KPPs• COICs

• Address The Capabilities & Limitations Of The FCS Enabled UA Mission Accomplishment– Produce An Evaluation Of Whether The FCS FOS, In The Context

Of The UA, Is Effective, Suitable, And Survivable

• Work In A Collaborative Environment To Maximize Commonality Of Resources & Ensure The Success Of FCS

6

Field Offices

System Level

Primary Functional Management Location

DirectorATEC Deputy Director

Test Planning, Integration,& Execution

Product Assurance

& VerificationTest

ResourcesM&S/T&E

Integration

Test Support & Facilities

Test Assessment &

Reporting

Evaluation Liaison

Cell

LSI Deputy DirectorPMO Deputy Director

St. Louis Office

C4ISRManned Combat Systems

Unmanned Ground Systems

Unmanned Aerial

Systems

Complementary Systems

Test Integration

Lethality/Munitions

Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland

National Capital Region

Warren, Michigan

Picatinny, New Jersey

Ft. Monmouth, New Jersey

Huntsville, Alabama

Ft. Huachuca WSMR UAMBL YPG Ft. Hood

Analysis Support

CTO OrganizationCTO Organization

System of System Level

7

COLLABORATION PROCESS

Combat Developer Defines Scenarios

And Vignettes

Mission Decomposition: Detailed Look at User Intent And How FCS Enabled Unit

Of Action Will Fight

ATEC:Evaluation Plan to Assess

Capabilities & Limitations

PM/LSI:SoS Spec,

FCS Design

FCS That Meets User’s Needs Within A

Shortened Acquisition Cycle

O&O,ORD

O&O,ORD, Spec,

Mission Decomp

O&O,ORD, Spec,

Mission Decomp, T&E Plans

Plan Together, Test Once, Share the Data

8

CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks



FCSElements(Platforms, Networks, …)

M&S

Data

TTOT

Evaluation Strategy


Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


By Thread


MISSIONMission Threads

(O&O)

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks


Joint/Compl

Systems

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

9

Platform/FoS/SoS Capabilities/Limitations

• MOEs, MOPs Based On COIs, ORD, KPP, AIs

• Platform Level – Based On Unique Platform Requirements

• FoS/SoS Level – Based On Synergistic Effects Of Multiple Platforms

– Focused On FCS’ Contributions To Capabilities

– Requires Complimentary Systems To Execute FCS Test

• Basis To Determine Capabilities And Limitations At All Levels

10

CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks



FCSElements(Platforms, Networks, …)

M&S

Data

TTOT

Evaluation Strategy

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks


Joint/Compl

Systems

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S


Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


By Thread


MISSIONMission Threads

(O&O)

11

Mission Capabilities & Limitations

• MOEs, MOPs Based on O&O, ORD, • Based On Live, Virtual & Constructive Events• Utilize Mission Decomposition Process To:

– Assist In OT Planning– Correlate Capabilities And Limitations At Platform, FoS & SoS To

Required Tasks– Determine Requirements For Force Effectiveness M&S

• Focused On FCS Contributions To Mission• Sensitivity Analyses Conducted To:

– Determine If Other FCS Or Complimentary Systems May Alleviate Shortfalls In Capabilities Caused By:

• Technical Limitations• Environmental Influences (Including Threat Effects)•

…– Enable Army Examination Of Alternate Scenarios/ Red Responses

12

1. Defeat enemy forces withdrawing to Baku2. Seize bridge vic OBJ BISHOP3. Conduct air assault with 1 dismounted INF COT

AS

KSJTF

UA1

JFLCC

UE1

CAB2

1. Establish multiple FOBs, on order conduct handover FOB security to 3d BN 504 PIR2. Defeat rebel forces W/SW of Baku3. Secure OBJ CAMELT

AS

KS

UA1

1. Seize RHC fac with min coll damage2. Defeat Rebel forces W&S/W of Baku3. Conduct vertical maneuver to BakuT

AS

KS

1. Destroy WMD2. Seize oil and gas pipelines and prod facilities3. Seize the RHC fac of the IFP mil forces4. Seize vital infrastructure with min coll damage5. Facilitate the transition of power6. Destroy Rebel forces in zoneT

AS

KS

1. Achieve air superiority2. Destroy WMD capability3. Facilitate control of energy centers4. Destroy resisting Rebel forcesT

AS

KS

Mission DecompositionMissions

Tasks

13

Task Decomposition

CAB2 Tasks

AUTL Task

AUTL Sub-tasks

MTP Tasks

LowerAUTLTasks

1. Defeat enemy forces withdrawing to Baku2. Seize bridge vic OBJ BISHOP3. Conduct air assault with 1 dismounted INF COT

AS

KS

1.Conduct UAV Flight Operations2. Conduct GCS (C2V) mission activities3. Conduct Autonomous SurveillanceT

AS

KS

ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant InformationART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User NeedsART 7.2.5 Disseminate a COP & Execution

Info

ART 7.2.2 Process Relevant Information to Create a COP

TA

SK

S

– TA 1 Deploy Conduct Maneuver– TA 2 Develop Intel – TA 3 Employ Firepower

– TA 5 Exercise C2

TA

SK

S

ART 8.1.2 Conduct an Attack

TA

SK

S

Missions

Tasks

14

FCS Task to Functional Capability MappingTasks

Capabilities

TASK F8:

Sup

port

mis

sion

pla

nnin

g/m

issi

on

rehe

arsa

l

F10

: E

nabl

e co

ntin

uous

est

imat

e of

si

tuat

ion

F11

: E

nabl

e vi

sual

izat

ion

of t

actic

al

sche

me

F12

: E

nabl

e di

ssem

inat

ion

of t

actic

al

sche

me

F15

: E

nabl

e co

ntin

uous

situ

atio

nal

unde

rsta

ndin

g th

roug

h ne

twor

ked

forc

e

F16

: F

acili

tate

aut

omat

ic la

ngua

ge

tran

slat

ion

F17

: E

nabl

e in

form

atio

n ex

chan

ge v

ia

adap

tive,

inte

grat

ed c

omm

unic

atio

ns

F18

: D

etec

t/pr

even

t in

trud

ers/

mal

icio

us

soft

war

e; id

entif

y po

ints

of

intr

usio

n/or

igin

, in

form

atio

n co

mpr

omis

ed/in

trod

uced

into

th

e ne

twor

k

F19

: E

nabl

e P

ositi

onal

Nav

igat

ion

(PO

SN

AV

)

F20

: E

nabl

e in

form

atio

n m

anag

emen

t to

fu

se,

mon

itor

and

diss

emin

ate

info

rmat

ion

to s

uppo

rt C

CIR

, co

mba

t ac

tion,

dec

isio

n-m

akin

g an

d an

alys

is

F21

: E

stab

lish

an a

dapt

ive

lear

ning

re

posi

tory

to

build

and

man

age

a lib

rary

of

frie

ndly

and

ene

my

DT

LOM

S a

nd le

sson

s le

arne

d

F22

: E

nabl

e te

rrai

n an

alys

is

F23

: In

tegr

ate

syne

rgis

tic u

se o

f IS

R t

o se

e th

e fu

ll ra

nge

of o

pera

tiona

l var

iabl

es

F25

: D

eter

min

e w

hat

is m

ost

dang

erou

s

Manage Tactical Information x x x x x / x xART 7.2.2 Process Relevant Information to Create a Common Operational Picture / x x / / x / x x x / xDisplay a Common Operational Picture (COP) Tailored to User Needs x x / x x / / /

15

FCS Functional Capability to ORD Requirements

2314 The FCS C4ISR network must provide dynamic, uninterrupted self-healing network connectivity. (Threshold)

2365 The FCS C4ISR network must function within the speed and quality of service as specified in Appendix J. (Top Level IERs)

2661 UAV systems must be capable of providing the operator the following in day/night/adverse weather from their operating altitude: system aerial location and magnetic heading information; sense a man; sense a tracked and wheeled vehicle; and assist with BDA.

2869 The FCS FoS must have a capability to proactively populate selected operating areas with unmanned sentinels linked to specific effect-munitions throughout the battlefield that enable the commanders to set their own conditions for decisive action. Sensors are necessary that verify and maintain SU of the operating area and enable the commander to target specific enemy actions that may impede his mobility. These sensors must cross cue a wide range of munitions effects from extended ranges to enhancing force protection, facilitate transitions, enable economy of force, and contribute to battlefield shaping. A full range of munition effects (lethal and non-lethal) enable commanders to choose the effect that best suits the maneuver plan. (Objective)

F15: Enable continuous situational

understanding through

networked force

Tasks

Capabilities

16

FCS ORD Requirements to MaterielCapabilities

Materiel

ORD # Requirement Systems to Meet RqtIntegrated ComputersNetwork ManagementIntegrated ComputersNetwork ManagementClass I UAVClass II UAVClass III UAVClass IV UAVSituational Understanding SSS

Tactical UGS SystemUrban UGS System

C2 Planning & Preparation SSS

C2 Battle Command & Mission Execution SSS

2869

The FCS FoS must have a capability to proactively populate selected operating areas with unmanned sentinels linked to specific effect-munitions throughout the battlefield that enable the commanders to set their own conditions for decisive action. Sensors are necessary that verify and maintain SU of the... operating area and enable the commander to target specific enemy actions that may impede his mobility. These sensors must cross cue a wide range of munitions

2314The FCS C4ISR network must provide dynamic, uninterrupted self-healing network connectivity. (Threshold)The FCS C4ISR network must function within the speed and quality of service as specified in Appendix J. (Top Level IERs)

2365

UAV systems must be capable of providing the operator the following in day/night/adverse weather from their operating altitude: system aerial location and magnetic heading information; sense a man; sense a tracked and wheeled vehicle; and assist with BDA.

2661

17

Capabilities/Limitations Assessed At All Levels

Decom

position

……

…

UA Mission Capabilities/Lim UA Level(Mission)

FoS/SoS Capabilities/Lim FoS/SoS Level

As defined in O&O

As defined inCOIC, KPP,

ORD

Platform Capabilities/Lim PlatformLevel

As defined in ORD, Spec

JTF Mission

JFLCC Task

UE Task

UA Task

FCS Task

Platform Task

Subsystem Task

18

Example Feedback to Be Provided to TRADOC and LSI Systems Engineering as a Result of this Endeavor thus

far:

• ORD 1215 - ”FCS FoS systems must be capable of automated precision engagements with automated fire control, distribution and clearance procedures with a manual back-up. (Threshold).” Rational paragraph indicates requirement enables “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets while static or moving”.

•SOS Spec - no capability at SOS level in spec for “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets while static or moving”; only addresses “rapid selection of high payoff and most dangerous targets” in paragraph 3.7.4.2.1.4.1 and 3.7.4.2.1.4.1 for threshold and objective requirements for MCS (ORD 3407) MCS. SOS Spec does not include ORD 3825 which indicates selection of high payoff targets requirement for ICV.

• ORD 1159 – “FCS systems must accomplish position/navigation (horizontal and vertical) to a one meter Spherical Error Probable (SEP) with a Low Probability of Detection (LPD)/ Interception (LPI) and in the presence of electronic jamming. (Objective)”

•SOS Spec - (3.2.1.3.2) identifies requirement as Objective. Only other references to navigation are 3.2.1.8.15.3.1- kit to enable legacy systems to be interoperable; 3.7.18.1- auto navigation for UAS CL I; 3.7.23.2.1.2.24 – UGS position themselves; directly enables 18 tasks from 3 missions, indirectly enables 37 tasks from 3 missions

• O&O (SORC) – Required Capability - Terrain Analysis. ORD addresses in 5.9.2 – no ORD Reference number; addresses in Appendix H, 2.5.1.3.1.1.6; Appendix F, Table 302; Appendix J IERs.

•SOS Spec – could not find any reference to requirement for terrain analysis; directly enables 21 tasks from 3 missions, indirectly enables 35 tasks from 3 missions

Applying Mission Decomposition & Capability Mapping to Construct

Operational Test Events Sample Application

20

Larger Unit Mission

Lane

Virtual Loop

So

SIL

System

Live Loop

UnitMission

Lane

NLOS-C

CL III UAS

UnitMission

Lane

C2V

UnitMission

Lane

MCS

SUGV

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

Task 1

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

Task 3

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

UA Missions in OT

21

Larger Unit Mission

Lane

Virtual Loop

So

SIL

System

Live Loop

UnitMission

Lane

NLOS C

CL III UAS

UnitMission

Lane

C2V

UnitMission

Lane

MCS

SUGV

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

Task 1

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

Task 3

Task 1

Task 1

Task 2

Task 2

Task 3

Task 3

Sample Task Set Applied OT Model

ART 8.1.2Conduct an

Attack

C2V

UnitMission

Lane

1.3.3.1 Conduct

Zone Recon

MTP 34-5-0041 Conduct UAV Flight Operations

MTP 34-5-0052 CGS Mission Activities

ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information

ART 7.2.5 Disseminate COP & Execution Information

ART 7.2.2 Process Relevant Information to create COP

RECON

UnitMission

Lane MCS

XX-XX Conduct Autonomous Surveillance

SUGV

8.5.1 Attack By Fire an Enemy Force /PositionART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information

ART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User Needs

ART 2.4.1 Conduct Lethal Direct Fire Against a Surface Target

MCS

UnitMission

Lane

ART 3.3.1.1 Conduct Surface to Surface Atk

MTP 34-5-0041 Conduct UAV Flight Operations

NLOS C

CL III UAS

ART 7.2.3 Display COP Tailored to User Needs

ART 7.2.1 Collect Relevant Information 3.3.1 Conduct Lethal

FS

NLOS

22


By Thread

Mission Delayed Awaiting Ground Sensor for NLOS

Comanche Provide Location

Accuracy for NLOS


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

MOPs/MOEs Platform Level (ORD, Spec)



FCSPlatforms MISSION

M&S

Data

TTOT

Evaluation Strategy Example


CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

UAV TLE =120M

NLOS = 25M CEP

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks


Joint/Compl

Systems

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

UAV Cannot Be used as Sensor for

NLOS in the precision mode

Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


23

Enemy Destroyed

Out of Contact

Manned Grnd Vehicle Protection Limited to 14.5mm

WIN-T/JTRS Provides

Connectivity

UAV Provides Enemy Location


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

MOPs/MOEs Platform Level (ORD, Spec)



FCSPlatforms MISSION

M&S

Data

TTOT

Evaluation Strategy Example


Network Provides Enemy Location to Commander

Prior to Engagement

CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks


Joint/Compl

Systems

Cap/Lim S, S, +Unks

M&S

Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


By Thread


24

The Road Ahead

• TRADOC Complete Decomposition of 1st Mission

• TRADOC, ATEC, PM/LSI Identify M&S Requirements

• Develop Common Database For All Stakeholders

– Identify All T&E Events

– Include All Measures For Evaluation

– Capabilities and Limitations Based

– Evaluation of Data and Confidence Levels Continuously Updated

Backup

26

FCS Test Program Schedule

ProductionSystem of

System Testing

MS BQ2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4FY2002 FY2003 FY2004 FY2005 FY2010FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009

Demos

ASARC

CTD

Integrated Evaluation Process

TFT# S3TFT# S2LUT1

Log Demo

SDD

Integration

IT/UT

IP S2

IP S3Integration

IT/UT

TRR

Spec Verif / Integr Qual Testing -SDD

Early Emulators Deliveries

Sims Deliveries

Init DP PIs Deliveries

TRR

Spec Verif / Integr Verif Testing - Prod

LFT - FUSL

Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4FY2012FY2011

FOCUA 1.6a

IP S4Integration

IT/UTTRR

Init Sys Deliveries

Q1Q2Q3Q4FY2013

IP P1Integration

IT/UTTRRInit Sys

Deliveries

Integration IT/UT

AssessmentIP S1

SoSIL Dev

TRR

LUT2TFT#S4

Log Demo

IP S5 **Integration

IMTTRR

Init SWDeliveries

IP P2Integration

IT/UTTRR

Init Sys Deliveries

** SW Testing only

IP P2

FacilitizationLL IPRWaiver Initial

ProductionDecision

SoS CDR IOC UA(-) W/ILOsSoS PDRSFR

IOTTFT#P1

LUT3 FDTE

Continuous Evaluation

TFT#P2

Log Demo

IntegrationIMT

OE/CE OE/CE

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment

Assessment Assessment

Assessment

Assessment

Alt 5A v12 4-13-03

27

ORD - KPP Mapping1020 1015 1021 KPP4 1016 1024 2947 KPP2 1159 1218 1215 1243 1036 3567 2869 3263 3719 KPP3 1182 2838 1248 KPP7 1268 2737 KPP5 2843 1240 KPP6 1093

3819 3341 3782 3783 3784 3786 3785 KPP1 1120 1148 3790 2850 3172 3173 3174 1239 3806 3791 3702 3703 3704 3706 3707 3708 3709 3813 2493 3710 3711

(174)(60)

1547 3303 1496 1535 1558 2830 1537 2758 1538 3771 3772 3838 2952 1336 3152 3831 3833 38321542 1540 1541 2769 1534 3799 1554 1536 15531520 1519 1512 1579 1582 2847 2846 1669 15592827 3787 2778 2800 1068 1555 2512 2786 32042814 2821 3726 1269 1550 1560 2807 2810 28713234 3235 3236 3237 3238 3239 3800 3814 15031050 1046 2862 1084 1079 1097

(5) (8) (4) (4)2873 1656 3822 2906 3715 2661 1489 1477 2562 1423 2774 3773 2514 1354 3148 3835 3276

1390 3147 3779 3017ICV MCS NLOS

Cannon

NLOS Mortar

R&SV C2V FRMV UAV (CL III)

UAV (CL II)

UAV (CL I)

MULE SUGV ISR & MASINT

CBRN UMASS

(17) (17) (17) (14) (8) (3) (8) (5) (5) (5) (14) (14) (16) (1) (12)2406 1073 3462 3755 3131 3128 3476 3216 1511 3405 3293 1700 1501 3394 3066 3096 2137 3658 3524 1414 1472 1473 1443 3845 1340 1359 3563 3078 33112408 2392 3463 3751 3122 3130 3475 3477 2684 3406 3297 1701 1498 2149 3068 3097 2245 3778 3775 1437 1492 3241 3839 3846 1341 1358 3280 33143159 2394 3464 3757 3123 3136 3214 3211 1508 3407 2205 2225 1500 3830 3074 3098 3396 3481 3529 1432 2591 3242 2689 3847 1339 1361 3281 33153160 2398 3465 1157 3133 3137 3215 3478 1514 2166 2202 2227 1499 3081 3099 3397 3482 3530 1421 2648 3243 3565 2530 1346 1356 3282 33163446 2413 3466 2314 3125 3138 1509 2157 2760 2229 3020 3083 3105 2141 3484 3532 3776 3746 3780 3828 2714 1347 1357 3283 33213447 3158 3467 2365 3126 1505 2156 2175 2723 3021 3087 3106 2138 3485 3534 2692 2537 1304 3777 3443 33233157 3750 3156 2368 1517 2155 2169 3725 1565 1641 1683 3723 3506 3535 3840 3826 1306 1308 3287 26113345 3754 3470 2395 1510 2158 2173 2221 3722 3092 3108 2139 3509 3444 3841 3827 1345 3448 3289 33271040 3752 3471 2488 1516 3231 2172 2215 1591 2192 3511 3538 3842 1352 1343 1307 3292 33252364 3756 3472 2501 1513 3589 3393 2216 1597 3113 3515 3541 2712 2523 3102 2833 3295 33262326 2467 3474 3153 2685 3408 2197 2224 1595 3114 3518 3546 2713 2528 1349 1364 3299 33293450 1064 2348 3753 2181 2976 3815 2278 3095 3109 1324 1453 2919 2832 3445 33312401 2464 2353 2355 3804 2986 2198 2725 1167 2542 2695 3116 2310 30763453 2419 1139 1086 3825 2992 2199 2223 2531 2787 3111 1367 38363458 1061 3266 3154 3805 2999 2204 2691 2792 38371041 2358 2323 3479 2259 3412 2208 3843 2900 32903749 2340 3155 3480 3721 3829 2207 3844 2902

- Responsiveness - Deployability

- Agility & Versatility - LethalityAs of 151700Apr03

- Survivability - SustainmentTotal # of ORD Rquirements (560)

- Training - Interoperability

Para 5-C4I StandsInteroperability

Lethality Survivability Sustainability Training

MV

Maneuver Sustainment

Common Manned Systems

ORD ANNEXES

Combat Systems

Battle Command C4ISR Annex A

Leader Development

Annex B

Soldier Annex C

UAV (CL IV) ARV

(68) (11) (8) (25) (22) (34)

UGSsUGVsUAVs

Common Unmanned Systems

BASE ORD - Para 4 (Required Capabilities)

MANNED SYSTEMS (Annex D) UNMANNED SYSTEMS (Annex E)

Responsiveness Deployability

Testability Log & Ready

Agility & Versatility

Training ESOH

28

Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


By Thread


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks




FCSElements (Platforms, Networks, . . . ) MISSION

M&S In Support of Evaluation


CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks

HWILMILDigitalSWILSILsSoSILWrap-Around Sim

FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks

Joint/Compl

Systems

SoSIL

Wrap-Around Sim

Federated Battle Labs

Force-On-Force M&S

HWILMILDigitalSWILSILsPRO-EBRL CADElement Level Models- Mobility (NATO Reference Model)- C4.(Comms, COP, FIRES)- ISR/Fusion- Synthetic Environment- Behavioral- Environ (Atmosphere, Propagation) - Threat (behavior, Platform, Signature)- Observable(Obscuration, Wx, Signature)

29

RTCA,C3 Driver,Embedded,Field Data

Collection Systems

CoreCompl

Systems


E, s, s, + Unks


Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks

Capabilities &

Limitations By

Mission+

Unks




FCSElements (Platforms, Networks, etc.) MISSION

Instrumentation & Facilities In Support of Evaluation


FCS FoS/SoS Cap/Lim

E, s, s, + Unks

Joint/Compl

Systems

RTCA,

Field Data Collection Systems,

Large Scale Data Integration

Platform Level,Embedded

Cap/Lim By Mission

+ Unks


By Thread

fcs acquisition & evaluation teaming army test and evaluation command

Documents

fcs contributions

fcs fos

fcs designfcs

fcs test basis

sos spec

capabilities limitationspmlsi

capabilities c

specmopsmoes fossos