fce asm 2016 carbon cycling cross-cutting...

23
FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS: All the members of the Primary production, biogeochemical cycling and organic matter dynamics working groups (including SPOM work), with special acknowledgement of the synthesis work led by Tiffany Troxler and Jordan Barr

Upload: dinhque

Post on 07-Jul-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

FCE ASM 2016

Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme

WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS: All the members of the Primary production, biogeochemical cycling and organic

matter dynamics working groups (including SPOM work), with special acknowledgement of the synthesis work led by Tiffany

Troxler and Jordan Barr

Page 2: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

CENTRAL QUESTIONS

Reminder of the central questions of the working group

GOAL II (Carbon): Determine how the balance of fresh and marine water supplies to the oligohaline ecotone, by influencing P availability, water residence time, and salinity will control the rates and pathways of C sequestration, storage, and export.

GENERAL QUESTION 6: How do changing freshwater inflows, tidal and storm cycles, and climate patterns affect the magnitude, rates, and pathways of C sequestration, loss, storage, and transport across the land-water continuum?

Page 3: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

NSF REVIEW FEEDBACK AND REFLECTION

Recommendation: Recognizing that a great deal of excellent work on carbon and organic matter decomposition dynamics is underway at the FCE-LTER, we recommend presenting this work to reviewers in an integrated, synthetic framework that links scales ranging from microbes to land and seascapes. It is not clear that the FCE-LTER has thought about the carbon research from this perspective (this comment extends to the discussion of data-model integration above). The panel recommends adding observations on redox chemistry and microbial community dynamics in order to elucidate the mechanisms that drive methane emissions, peat collapse, plant production and other soil-related processes.

Page 4: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

GENERAL WORKING GROUP PROGRESS

One or two key new (post-review) results from working group that pertain to the central

questions and/or review feedback

A Bunch of ------------------

Page 5: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Synthesis!!!

Troxler et al 2015 Oceanography

Page 6: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Image on left: Flow is restored beneath the 1-mile bridge at the Tamiami Trail along the northeast boundary of the Park, May 2013. Project cost: $93 million USD. Everglades science helped inform the cost benefits of this project and a proposed additional 2.6 mile bridge.

Florida Coastal Everglades carbon cycle research

Page 7: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Florida Coastal Everglades carbon cycle research

Barr et al 2015 Eos

Page 8: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Tidal wetland focus

!  Spatio-temporal integration of –NEE, C burial, and change in C stocks !  Continuous monitoring of DIC and DOC IN and OUT of coastal rivers !  Surveys of pulses following disturbances !  Link remote sensing and ecosystem models to GPP, RE, and -NEE

Alkalinity

CO2 from calcification

Page 9: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Inter-group: Synthesis of Carbon and Trophic Dynamics working groups: Atwood et al 2015 Nature Climate Change

Page 10: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Does Increased nutrient supply influence ecosystem C storage in our oligotrophic systems? •  Increased production •  Increased decomposition

SHORT TERM (5 year) EXPERIMENTS Armitage and Fourqurean 2016 Biogeosciences

Page 11: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Does Increased nutrient supply influence ecosystem C storage in our oligotrophic systems? •  Increased production •  Increased decomposition

Howard, Lopes, Perez and Fourqurean in press ECSS

LONG-TERM (30 y) EXPERIMENTS

Page 12: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Net ecosystem exchange (-NEE) at two marsh sites: Shark River and Taylor Sloughs

Page 13: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Net ecosystem exchange (-NEE) at mangrove forest site SRS6

Some leaf-litter carbon enters the estuary and is exported as DIC, DOC, and POC There is some decoupling between –NEE and leaf-litter Disturbance events influence seasonal leaf-litter C patterns

Page 14: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

NECB ≈ Soil C accretion (decades or longer) NECB / -NEE = (225 / 1016) = 22% ! 78% of C is exported

Annual carbon budgets in mangrove forests

Page 15: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

“While changes in ecosystem structure, species composition, and disturbance regimes were beyond the scope of this research, results do indicate that climate change will produce small changes in CO2 dynamics in Everglades freshwater marsh ecosystems and suggest that the hydrologic regime and oligotrophic conditions of Everglades freshwater marshes lowers the ecosystem sensitivity to climate change.”

Malone et al 2015 Ecosphere

Observed (solid) versus modeled (hollow) CO2 exchange rates (NEE, Reco and GEE) at TS (A) and SRS (B). Atmospheric convention is used here and positive numbers

indicate a loss of C to the atmosphere.

Scenarios

pCO2 T Rain

Page 16: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Aquatic Carbon Export - Shark RiverDavid Ho, University of Hawaii

• Con$nuous  measurements  of:  •  Dissolved  inorganic  carbon  •  Dissolved  organic  carbon  • Water  residence  $me  

•  Gas  transfer  velocity  

•  To  derive:  •  Con$nuous  record  of  lateral  DIC  and  DOC  export  from  Shark  River  into  Gulf  of  Mexico    

•  Con$nuous  record  of  air-­‐water  CO2  fluxes  in  Shark  River  (example  next  slide)  

Page 17: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

pCO2

k(600)

F(CO2)

Page 18: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

(Zhang et al, 2014)

Page 19: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:
Page 20: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Production of primary producers other than seagrasses in Florida Bay

Sweatman and Collado-Vides

Page 21: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

CO2 (aq)

CO2 (atm)

Organic C Carbonates

Alkalinity

Discussion point

Page 22: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Back of the envelop calculations: Over millennia, Florida Bay has had a net flux of ca. 2 gC m-2 month-1 to the atmosphere as a result of calcification, but only ca. 0.6 gC m2 month-1 uptake from the atmosphere for long-term NPP

Page 23: FCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Themefcelter.fiu.edu/.../Carbon_CCT_presentation-2016_FCE_LTER_ASM.pdfFCE ASM 2016 Carbon cycling Cross-Cutting Theme WORKING GROUP PARTICIPANTS:

Recommendation: Recognizing that a great deal of excellent work on carbon and organic matter decomposition dynamics is underway at the FCE-LTER, we recommend presenting this work to reviewers in an integrated, synthetic framework that links scales ranging from microbes to land and seascapes. It is not clear that the FCE-LTER has thought about the carbon research from this perspective (this comment extends to the discussion of data-model integration above). The panel recommends adding observations on redox chemistry and microbial community dynamics in order to elucidate the mechanisms that drive methane emissions, peat collapse, plant production and other soil-related processes.