fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes · pawel baran “fate and behaviour...
TRANSCRIPT
Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes
Pawel Jan Baran M. Eng.
Unit of Technology of Fuels (TEER)
RWTH Aachen University
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Outline
Introduction
Project NanoEmission
Basic research
Measurement campaign in WtE plant Weisweiler
Methods
Results
Conclusions
2/25
Introduction
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Definition
Nanomaterial: „A natural, incidental or manufactured
material containing particles, in an unbound state or as an
aggregate or as an agglomerate and where, for 50 % or more
of the particles in the number size distribution, one or more
external dimensions is in the size range 1 nm - 100 nm. …"[1]
CeO2
BaSO4
Source: Recommendation on the definition of a nanomaterial (2011/696/EU), 18.10.2011 (updated on 08.06.2016)
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/nanotech/faq/definition_en.htm#top-page
ZnO
4/25
Ag
TiO2
Quantum Dots
CNT
Project NanoEmission
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Approach
Extension of the knowledge in the field of emission behavior of nanoparticles in
waste incineration process:
6/25
Characterization of the emission behaviour of nanoparticles during combustion
Evaluation and optimization of filter media with focus on reduction of nanoparticles in exhaust gases
Human- and ecotoxicological assessment of nanoparticle fractions found in exhaust gases
Basic research
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Project-specific nanomaterial
8/25
Barium sulfateThe primary particle size:~40 nm;Particle size distribution: d50= ~100 nm
Fig. 2: SEM picture of BaSO4 agglomerates and particle size distribution by number in aqueous suspension (0,7% Ecodis P-30) (DLS)
Source: LFG Erlangen, MLU Halle
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Sintering behaviour of BaSO4
9/25
Fig.3 Change of the test samples’ surface area during heating in the presence of air (heating microscope)
Source: TEER RWTH Aachen
Shrinkage starting temperature of BaSO4
BaSO4 d50= 1,7µm
BaSO4 d50= 40nm
532 °C 650 °C
25°C 1500°C
25°C 1500°C
Change o
fsurf
ace
are
a[%
]
temperature (°C)
Melting point (Bulk): 1580°CSource: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (85th ed.). CRC Press. 2004.
pp. 4–45.
Measurement campaign in WtE plant Weisweiler (Germany) (16-20.11.2015)
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
11/25
Experiments in waste incineration plant Weisweiler
A. Waste bunker
B. Firing system
C. Evaporating cooler
D. Fabric filter
E. Catalysts
BaSO4 dosing system
total dust content / Impaktor
combustion residues sampling
Measurement points
R1. after boiler
R2. after evaporating cooller
R3. after fabric filter
E1. Bottom ash discharger
E2. Boiler ash discharger
E3. Residue from fabric filter
AB
C
D
E
R1
R2E3
E1 E2
R3
Z1
Methods
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Z1: Addition of nanomaterial
13/25
Fig.4: Production and dosing of nanosuspension
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
E1-3: Sampling points for combustion residues
14/25
E1: Bottom ash E2: Boiler ash E3: Residue from fabric filter
Determination of Ba concentration ICP-MS Analysis
Fig.5: Sampling und preparation of combustion and filtration residues conducted according to DIN 22022 and DIN 51701
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
R1-3: Dust measurement techniques
15/25
Fig.6: Devices for the dust measurement (left), principle of particle impaction (right, above) and precipitator with collected dust (right, below).
Mobile filter probe
Gravimetric determination of dust load
Particle size selective
measurement (cascade impactors)
Determination of Ba
concentration ICP-MS
Analysis
Determination of dioxin and
heavy metals content
toxicological examinations
Results
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
E1-3: Mass concentration of Ba in combustion residues
17/25
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Ma
ssco
nce
ntr
ati
on
of
Ba
[%]
time [hh:mm]
Entnahmepunkt E1: Rostaasche
Entnahmepunkt E2: Kesselasche
Entnahmepunkt E3: Gewebefilterasche
18.11.2016
19.11.2016
E1: Bottom ash
E2: Boiler ash
E3: Residue from fabric filter
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
R1: Gravimetric determination of particle mass concentrationflue gas after boiler
18/25
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
Bari
um
[µ
g/m
³ i.
N., t
r.]
Du
st[m
g/m
³ i.
N., t
r.]
(hh:mm)
Gesamtstaub (VDI 2066) Barium (ICP-MS)
18.11.2015 (without BaSO4) 19.11.2015 (with BaSO4)
Dust load (VDI 2066)
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
R4: Gravimetric determination of particle mass concentrationclean gas after fabric filter
19/25
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
2.00
14:10 15:20 16:30 12:45 13:52 15:21 16:25
Ba
riu
m [
µg
/m³
i.N
., t
r.]
Du
st[m
g/m
³ i.
N., t
r.]
(hh:mm)
Gesamtstaub (VDI 2066) Barium (ICP-MS)
18.11.2015 (without BaSO4)
Detection limit
19.11.2015 (with BaSO4)
Dust load (VDI 2066)
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0.01 0.1 1 10
Du
std
mc/
dlo
gD
ae5
0[m
g/m
³ i.
N.,
tr.
]
Particle diameter Dae50 [µm]
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0.01 0.1 1 10
Ba
riu
m d
c/d
log
Dae5
0[µ
g/m
³ i.
N.,
tr.
]
Du
std
mc/
dlo
gD
ae5
0[m
g/m
³ i.
N.,
tr.
]
20/25
18.11; 15:23 Ba<100 nm: 214 µg/m³ i.N., tr.
19.11; 15:12 Ba <100 nm: 595 µg/m³ i.N., tr.
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0.01 0.1 1 10
Ba
riu
m d
c/d
log
Da
e50
[µg
/m³
i.N
., t
r.]
Particle diameter Dae50 [µm]
Staub Barium
19.11 18:00 Ba <100 nm:
543 µg/m³ i.N., tr.
R1: Determination of particle size distribution (cascade impactor) flue gas after boiler
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Mass balance
21/25
Z1: Waste 16,2 t/h, Ba: 44,2 kg/h E1: Ash 3,95 t/h, Ba: 26,2 kg/h
E2: Ash 0,27 t/h, Ba: 2,6 kg/h
E3: Filtration residue 0,6 t/h Ba:
1,4 kg/h
*Barium background concentration has been substructed
100%
59,1%
5,8% 3,2%0,14 ppm
(1,3 %)
(1,2 %)
Recovery rate 68,1 %
separation efficiency of filter:
Dust: 99,87 – 99,94%
Barium: 99,98 – 99,99%
<100 nm: 99,97 – 99,99%
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Comparison
22/25
Research group /
Incineration plant
ENM Mass distribution Separation efficiency
ETH Zürich / Municipal
waste incineration plant *
nano-CeO2 Slag:
81% Ce
Fly ash:
19% Ce
Quench water:
0,02% Ce
Electrostatic precip.
C1: 99,9 % (Ce)
KIT Karlsruhe / Hazardous
waste incineration plant **
nano-CeO2 Boiler:
10,6 %Ce
Quench water:
68,7 % Ce
Fly ash:
0,1% Ce
Electrostatic precip.
99,99 % (Ce)
Fraunhofer Umsicht /
sewage-sludge-incineration
plant
nano-TiO2 Bottom ash
& boiler:
89,9% Ti
Adsorber & fabrik filter residue:
10,7% Ti
Fabrik filter:
99,99% (Ti)
NanoEmission / Municipal
waste incineration plant
nano-BaSO4 Bottom ash:
59,1% Ba
Boiler:
5,8% Ba
Fabrik filter res
3,2 % Ba
Fabrik filter:
99,98% (Ba)
Source:
Walser, T.; Limbach, L. K.; Brogioli, R.; Erismann, E.; Flamigni, L.; Hattendorf, B.; Juchli, (2012) Persistence of engineered nanoparticles in a
municipal solid-waste incineration plant.
Liesen, I.-M., Baumann W., Hauser M., Mätzing H., Paur H.-R., Seifert H., Untersuchung zur Freisetzung von synthetischen Nanopartikeln bei der
Börner et al. Abfallverbrennung , Energie aus Abfall Band 12, 2015 Tagungsband
Untersuchung möglicher Umweltauswirkungen bei der Entsorgung nanomaterialhaltiger Abfälle in Abfallbehandlungsanlagen
Conclusions
Pawel Baran
“Fate and behaviour of nanomaterials in incineration processes”
8th CEWEP Waste-to-Energy Congress 2016
16-17 June in Rotterdam
Conclusions
24/25
• Emission behaviour dependent on thermochemical properties of ENMs
• High total dust content agglomeration tendency
• Fluctuating background concentration of trace elements in waste and long
residence time of NP difficulties in accurate estimation of the nanoparticle’s
path distribution
• Most significant distribution pathway of ENMs is the bottom ash (50 – 90%)
• High separation efficiency in existing flue gas cleaning systems
• Fate and behavior of ENMs in combustion residues is still to clarify
Thank you for your interest!
Pawel Jan Baran M. Eng.
Wüllnerstraße 2
Raum Be 126
RWTH Aachen University
52056 Aachen
www.teer.rwth-aachen.de