fast fish forum roundtable sessions

11
Fishbowl Artefacts 6 April 2016

Upload: bsgafrica

Post on 18-Jan-2017

473 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Fishbowl Artefacts6 April 2016

Page 2: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions
Page 3: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Discussion points for the fishbowl sessions

• Ensuring that innovative solutions are sustainable and can fit with existing systems and processes:o Is the traditional role of architecture valid in

modern software development?

• The need to deliver change that must bring about an exceptional experience for customers and users:o Integrating customer research and usability

testing into incremental software delivery

Page 4: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Is the traditional role of architecture valid in modern software development?

Test the business perspective of architects

How should we measure architectural success?

Architects to support and guide the process, not just “block” it

Additional challenges when not all architects

work together

Architects must align business and IT

How do we connect the dots

at the end with the team?

Compared to a blueprint of a house – upfront issues

versus not being able to do renovations

Architects should play a strategic

role

Architects should be the advisors of non-functional requirements and designs

Guiding rather than

pushing

Could the product owner be the new enterprise

architect?

What is an appropriate level

of control?

Need to get more frequent input from architects – should be

closer and part of the delivery teams

Multiple teams being led by a

“chief architect”

T / Pi shaped people

Page 5: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Is the traditional role of architecture valid in modern software development?

Ownership needs to be correctly allocated

Architectural skill can come from team, could be multiple people who

fulfil this

Control over-emphasised, what is correct level of touch?

It’s a function not a role, not about person in role –

about having right architectural skills

Rate of change is important

Different labels for architects make it confusing

Architects need “skin in the game”

Instead of focusing on different labels for different architects, focus on ultimate role

to ensure good alignment and direction

Organisations need to change

and structure for the change

Need to be fast and nimble, architecture part of this

Agile methodology needed –challenge is how architects fit

into that

Need to grow into business architecture role

Page 6: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Integrating customer research and usability testing into incremental software delivery

Limited UX skills available in South Africa

Adhere to UX principles versus standardised

templates

Drive outside-in thinking for customer centricity

Need to be doing anything greater than zero

UX doesn’t have to be specialist, can be covered by delivery team

Incorporate into “traditional” as-is analysis

Change organisational mind-set to not

see UX as part of something being done, it’s a skill in

itself

Need to ensure interviews are broader than system

being built

Are dedicated teams needed?

Multiple areas in UX

requiring skill

Decide what is enough upfront

Interviews aren’t just “do you want this or this”, need to be addressing a need

UX not just external use, as important for internal user

Ideally every person in company can input in UX

Difficult to get feedback from

external customers –

should be easy and build model

into business processes and

front end

So much value to deliver to customer if just want

to listen to them

Page 7: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Integrating customer research and usability testing into incremental software delivery

How much is enough research?

Customers can be wrong

Staff need to utilise UX skills and

fully immerse themselves

Should be solving real customer problems, not just enabling ease of use

Don’t want analysis paralysis, but if not enough research run risk of

being wrong

Don’t need process that is perfect, can reiterate and learn as you go along

Combining new and traditional methods

Can’t go to market with wrong information, but can with

some idea of what is important

UX and CX for product design or systems design

In today’s fast moving customer-demand driven world, BA and UX must converge

Can’t ignore customer in analytics process,

BAs must use BA methodology as part of

toolkit

Page 8: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions
Page 9: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Is the traditional role of architecture valid in modern software development?

Page 10: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Integrating customer research and usability testing into incremental software delivery

Page 11: Fast Fish Forum roundtable sessions

Thank you for joining us!Keep the conversation going