fashion faux pas: gucci and lvmh
DESCRIPTION
Fashion Faux Pas Case study: Gucci and LVMH. The case Fashion Faux Pas: Gucci & LVMH deals with the hostile takeover and the legal battle between the companies in the controlling ownership of Gucci shortly after its initial public offeringTRANSCRIPT
Executive Summary
Set in 2000, Gucci Group is at a cross road and its strategic decision at this juncture will define the future of the
world’s fourth largest US$1.2 billion luxury group. Gucci is a 77 years old group, established in 1923 in Florence
selling luggage imported from Germany. It has transformed itself over the last 77 years and moved from a family
owned entity to a public listed company. After 77 years of its existence, it now sells a wide range of luxury goods
starting from leather goods, fragrance, cosmetics, shoes, watches, apparel, jewelry, silk ties & scarves etc. More
importantly, what started as a single product, single brand company that was focused on small leather goods has
now transformed itself into a multi-brand, multi-product group with worldwide presence. The case Fashion Faux
Pas: Gucci & LVMH deals with the hostile takeover and the legal battle between the companies in the controlling
ownership of Gucci shortly after its initial public offering. Thus, J4 examined the actions pursued by Gucci as it has
practiced the “poison pill” mechanism. Further, the group identified area of opportunity in which the internal
organization of Gucci can focus on to deliberately align its strategies with its mission and vision. To achieve these
goals, the proponent used several tools in congruence with the identified problems hindering the company’s
endeavor to achieve its goals. The proponent initially looked into the internal structure of Gucci through its company
profile. Acknowledging the significant impact of external environment and the fashion industry in the performance
of the company, the proponent used the PESTL Analysis and Porter’s Five Forces of Competition Analysis. With
the PESTL, it was found that the economic and social aspects of environment have the utmost impact to the
company. Porter’s result on the other hand posted a moderate to high level of competitiveness within the fashion
industry. Furthermore, the proponents included other analysis of general environment to completely realize what
action(s) to undertake to satisfy the goals of Gucci. TOWS Matrix evaluates the company’s historical transactions
and strategies to gain a better picture of the company’s current status and lead the proponent to a realistic action plan
for the future. This tool is an aid to identify strengths and opportunities that can serve as armors in battling the
weaknesses and threats in the organization. With the integration and matching of the results of the tools used, the
strategic action chosen as the grand strategy was determined to be the pursuance of market expansion. This can help
the company proceed to development and growth. This action is appropriate since the company’s status in the
industry has been at par with the superior brands like LVMH, Prada, Hermes, and the like.
Mission: To become a group leader in the luxury market at world-wide level through: putting into effect and
maintaining the company’s objective was to enhance its rapid development and growth plans, as well as to bring
about great flexibility to its production and business processes.
Vision: To become the global multi-brand, well-diversified luxury goods company leader.
Central Problem
The battle between Gucci and LVMH brought the former to spill a “poison pill” (ESOP) into competition with the
latters’ attempt of hostile takeover. Gucci then faced a dilemma on how it will reposition itself in the fashion
industry and how it will find opportunities to enjoy organic growth to pro-actively prevent takeover by a competitor
like LVMH.
Objectives
To resolve the conflict between LVMH and Gucci
To evaluate whether the actions taken by Gucci’s management in defending its independence were actually
in the best interests of all the stakeholders
To save Gucci from LVMH’s unwanted takeover advances in the future
SWOT Analysis
Strengths:
Well-known brand
Aggressive strategy through diversification and communication
Expansive product lines with huge aspirational value
Wide-ranging presence worldwide
Weaknesses:
Company size is small
Prices of product are relatively high
Limited target customers
Opportunities:
Promising wide market potential of luxury markets is growing in Asia
The latest developments in multimedia technology for advertisements and marketing
Expansion of product portfolio
Consolidation of other brands that can provide a competitive advantage
Threats:
Stiffening competition
Presence of substitutes such as medium brand products
Imitation of Gucci products
Alternative courses of action
1. Market Expansion
Advantages:
Growth in terms of market share
Improved market position
Strengthening and adding more value to the company and its brand name
Opportunities for revenue growth through new market openings
Enables manufacturing company to become and remain competitive in order to retain existing jobs and
create new ones.
Increases public and private research and development investment, and improves methods for
transferring and commercializing new discoveries.
Disadvantages:
High investment is required in order to support the market expansion
The company needs to undertake legal proceedings required to enter new markets which may ear
substantial costs
Extensive study of the new marketplace and their long-term objectives will be required which is time-
consuming and capital-intensive
2. Related Diversification
Advantages:
Control markets by guaranteeing sales and distribution
Take advantage of existing expertise, knowledge and other resources in the company
Reduced costs
Disadvantages:
Shared losses and risks
3. Innovation and improvement of current technologies
Advantages:
Distinguish your business from competitors
Get free advertising
Attract top quality employees
Disadvantages:
Investment in research and development is quite high
Costly operating expenses
Additional cost for training and development of human resources
4. Strategic alliance with acquired companies
Advantages:
Focus on core strengths
Opportunity for growth
Shared risks
Disadvantages:
Reduced profit
Cultural differences and difficulties
Recommendation
The Market Expansion step is that period when a company assesses current markets, identifies untapped markets,
and seeks opportunities for revenue growth through new markets. The market expansion plan will result in estimates
for delivering new capabilities to current markets, and potential new markets for existing products.
Gucci has a strong brand image worldwide but it has not expanded yet into other markets mainly it has focused in
major markets in Europe and North America. The company can capitalize on favourable opportunities in the Asian
market. Asia is a fast growing economy with rapid increase in the number of high net worth individuals. Gucci can
also treat Asia as country-by-country region to identify and categorize more potential markets from the less ones. In
that case, it will reduce cost in investments. Japan, China, Hong Kong, Korea, Singapore are top five countries that
are seen by most researchers that can be tapped by Gucci.
Thus, market expansion is the best choice for Gucci to strategically maintain and enhance its position in the industry
as one of the superior branded products worldwide. Increased market share will substantially decrease the advances
of LVMH. With the opening of new distribution networks in the selected areas in Asia, Gucci will now be able to
serve its clients world-over which will further lead to stronger brand equity. It will increase the bottom line and yield
higher value for shareholders.