farakel company ^ r, /* ^ f, v/ paint and kaby lake project · 2017. 1. 17. · farakel company ^...

42Ei3SE0eee 2.5415 KABY LAKE 010

FARAKEL COMPANY ^ r, /* ^ f, V/

PAINT AND KABY LAKE PROJECT

M ^

REPORT ON V.L.F. EM

AND

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYS

1982

l ll

l M.N.NO LANDS SECT.ON

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

H Prepared by

Hill, Goettler, De Laporte Limited Suite 904-80 Richmond Street West

l Toronto, Ontario. M5H 2C7

l

l

l

l l ll

l l l l l l l l l

l fl

42E13SE0886 2. 5415 KABY LAKE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS l

PROPERTY 2

LOCATION AND ACCESS 3

INTRODUCTION 4

GENERAL GEOLOGY 5

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS 6

V.L.F. ELECTROMAGNETICS 7

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY 8

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 9

SURVEY PERSONNEL 11

LIST OF MAPS 13

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

The V.L.F. EM surveys in Farakel Company's Paint and Kaby

Lake claim blocks has resulted in the selection of 38 conductive

areas considered as valid targets for possible gold-bearing mine

ralization. These targets were selected, based on the criteria that

conductors that cross or intersect regional trends of strike, faulting

or the contact between the granodiorite and the volcanics are the

most likely to be of significance.

It is the contention that most, if not all, the east-west

or east-northeast trending linear anomalies are caused by regional

structures and that these can be downgraded or disregarded as

targets of gold mineralization.

The erratic magnetic intensity patterns resulting from the

contouring the magnetometer survey data are considered to be incon

clusive with respect to indicating target areas for possible gold

mineralization or use as adjuncts to interpret or rate the V.L.F.

anomalies.

Follow-up detailed V.L.F. coverage of the selected zones

of interest with lines at approximately 35 to 50 metre spacings and

readings at 12.5 m intervals is recommended to better define the

individual conductors by fixing their locations by their juxta

position to the maximum field strengths obtained. Diamond drill

investigations would be greatly facilitated by this work for posi

tioning the drill more accurately with respect to the conductors.

Diamond drilling of targets of considered merit is recommended.

12.

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

Page 2.

PROPERTY

The two claim blocks under discussion here aggregating

some 512 claims are held by Farakel Company, Miners' Licence No. T-

1211, whose address is Suite 4000, 601 Jefferson Street, Houston,

Texas, 77002 U.S.A.

There were 403 claims involved in the V.L.F. EM and

magnetometer survey and their numbers are listed as follows:

TB 632073 - 632078

632272 - 632276

637093 - 637135

637142 - 637267

637269 - 637319

637323 - 636397

637402 - 637407

637447 - 637451

637456 - 637465

637471 - 637480

637488 - 637491

640801 - 640804

640813 - 640816

640835 - 640843

640848 - 640864

640866 - 640892

64146


Page 3.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Farakel Company ground comprises two large claim

blocks, one in Elmhirst and Walters Townships and one in Rickaby

Township and the adjoining Kaby Lake Area, in the Jellicoe region of

Ontario.

Most of the claims can be reached by logging roads from

Highway No. 11 which runs in a general east-west direction through

Jellicoe which lies to the south. A provincial highway, No. 801,

traverses the west end of the Paint Lake grid and a major logging

road traverses the southern part of the Kaby Lake grid. These two

roads are the only local ones kept open throughout the winter season.

Other disused logging roads throughout the claim blocks can be

driven by truck in the summer months or snowmobile in winter.

Paint Lake in Walters Township provides good access to the

claims in that area by boat in summer and snomobile in winter.


Page 4.

INTRODUCTION

The ground geophysical surveys covering approximately two-

thirds of the claims held by Farakel Company in the Jellicoe Area of

Ontario were done by Hill, Goettler, de Laporte Limited whose address

is Suite 904, 80 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2C7.

The field work completed was done in two separate periods,

one with winter and the other with summer conditions being from

March 4 to April 10 and June 3 to August 14, 1982 respectively.

V.L.F. electromagnetic and proton magnetometer surveys

were run over almost all of the Paint Lake grid and much of the Kaby

Lake grid and the total line-kilometers surveyed were 510.9 V.L.F.

and 363.1 magnetometer respectively.


Page 5.

GENERAL GEOLOGY

The general areas containing the claim blocks under dis

cussion here have been mapped at a scale of one inch equals a half

mile by the Ontario Geological Survey, specifically maps No. 2373

and 2356. A broader perspective of the general geology can be

obtained from the Tashota-Geraldton Sheet of the geological compila

tion series, Map No. 2102.

The main geologic feature of considered interest pertinent

to the claims is the presence of mapped granodiorite intrusions in

intermediate to felsic metavolcanics. Widespread gold mineraliza

tions are known in the area and both the intrusive and their peri

pheral areas are considered to present prime exploration targets as

per the Balmoral Mine model, in the Bourlamaque Batholith in the Val

d'Or area of Quebec where gold mineralization of economic signifi

cance was discovered based on V.L.F. electromagnetic investigations.


Page 6.

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

Grid control on each survey grid, ie, the Paint Lake grid

and the Kaby Lake grid, was established by cutting a transit con

trolled east-west baseline from which a north-south line designated

as line 0+00 was cut and chained. Further baselines were turned off

and cut from lines 0+00 with their locations established by aerial

photographs and by cut and chained north-south tie lines.

The baselines were cut and picketed along a direct line of

sight and chained horizontally to 40-metre intervals. North-south

cut lines were chained and picketed at 25-metre intervals.

The Paint Lake grid has three baselines, A, B and C

aggregating 21.1 km. Tie lines were 0+00, 24+00 west and 48+00 west

aggregating 9.2 km.

The Kaby Lake grid has three cut baselines, U, V and W for

a total of 23.3 km as well as two additional baselines X and Y which

were chained and flagged east-west for a total of 6.4 km. Tie lines

were 0+00, 40+00 west and 36+00 west for a total of 9.7 km.

The geophysical instrument surveys were run north-south on

a compass lines of 120 metre separation turned off 90 0 from th base

lines with reading stations marked by flagging at 25 metre intervals.

Chaining was by hip chainers and the location of the lines was

controlled by their location at the baselines.


Page 7.

V.L.F. ELECTROMAGNETICS

The V.L.F. surveys were carried out with Crone Radem

V.L.F. instruments employing Seattle Washington as the primary

transmitter station. (24.8 KHZ). This station was selected as

being on an azimuth roughly parallel to the regional strike of the

volcanic rocks in the area and also for having the least disruptive

schedule of shutdowns. An alternate transmitter sources, at Cutler

Maine was occasionally used with the filed strength being tied in to

known stations read on Seattle.

The V.L.F. surveying was carried out in closed loops to

enable each loop to be corrected for diurnal variations of field

strengths. Individual lines were not tied together as field strengths

were presented in profile rather than contoured form. The dip angles

were recorded and also presented in profile form.

Stations were read at 25-metre intervals on lines of 120-

metre separation with total distances surveyed of 241.7 km and 269.2

km on the Paint and Kaby Lake grids respectively.

The Paint Lake grid has been more or less completely

covered excepting several small swampy areas and part of the south-

east corner of the grid where summer access was poor.

Approximately 67% of the Kaby Lake grid has been covered

with essentially the northeast and northwest corners to be completed.

The winter surveying was concentrated in the lake areas to

take advantage of the ice conditions prevailings.


Page 8.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

The magnetometer used was a Geometrics G816 proton precession

instrument with readings taken at the same stations as in the

V.L.F. survey.

Principal base stations for the Paint and Kaby Lake grids

were established at 0+00 on baseline B and at 0+00 on baseline V

(12+00 south) respectively. Subsidiary base stations were set up

along each baseline where survey lines extended both north and south

by reading a few selected stations at approximate 4-line intervals,

then returning to the base station for diurnal correction. This

procedure was repeated for successive loops to the limit of the

baseline. These subsidiary base stations were used to check diurnal

variations during the surveys.

Individual lines were tied in to base stations. Lines

were run as closed loops to provide diurnal variation control.

After corrections for diurnal variation and base station tie-in, a

background value (59,000 gammas for Paint Lake and 60,000 gammas for

Kaby Lake) was subtracted from the total field readings. The residual

values were then plotted and contoured.


Page 9.

INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS

All dip angle crossovers except those showing weak field

strength and dip angle changes are considered to be probably caused

by bedrock features. Those areas showing weak responses are considered

probably caused by conductive overburden.

The varying intensity of the conductor responses may be

due in part to the sulphide content (the instrument responding to at

least 3!?) and also due to the depth of overburden.

The survey has resulted in a multitude of anomalous

V.L.F. responses of varying intensity and interpreted with. Many of

the anomalies are oriented compatible with the regional trends of

the greenstones in a general east-northeast direction and being long

and linear are not considered to be significant as indicators to

possible gold-bearing mineralization. However, conductors displaying

cross-cutting or converging trends, many of which are relatively

short and flexed and more discreet are considered to be of possible

significance for gold-bearing mineralizations by reflecting inter

secting structures such as shear and fault zones. Such anomalies,

especially when located close to the map inferred contact between

the granodiorite and the valcanics are especially considered to be

of interest.

In total, 38 anomalous areas have been selected for

follow-up ground investigation, 18 in the Paint Lake Area (P1-P18)

and 20 in the Kaby Lake Area (K1-K20).

The overall magnetic intensity relief encountered in the

magnetometer surveying completed is in the range of 3000 gammas.

/10.

l l l l l l l l l l

l l l lll l l

Page 10.

However, there is apparently insufficient magnetic contrast

either between or within the two main intrusive and metavolcanic

rock groups to provide much clear distinction and generally confused

patterns of small localized features are indicated. It is generally

possible, however, to locate the general granodiorite-volcanic

contact zone on each pluton although the area immediately south of

Kaby Lake is the only section where the contact is clearly delineated.

There appears to be no direct correlation or coincidence

between anomalous magnetics and the V.L.F. conductive zones selected,

such that there is no corroborative support for rating areas of

interesting conductivity.

All of which is respectfully submitted,

HILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED

G. W. Goettler, P.Eng.

March 7, 1983

/li.

1111111111111111111

9

WINTER WORK

M. J. Taylor

G. Jeffs

R. Greenwood

W. Clark

R. Williams

D. Vanderneer

P. Morra

H. Brown

Page 11.

SURVEY PERSONNEL

Geologist. Field Supervisor904-80 Richmond Street West, Toronto, OntarioM5H 2C7

Technician417 St. Clair Avenue East, Toronto, OntarioM4T 1P6

P.O.Box 434,White River, OntarioPOM 3GO


41 Broadway Avenue, Apt. 1A, Wawa, Ontario POS 1KO


Technician96 Nino Drive,Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6B 3V6

904-80 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario

M5H 2C7

712.

,

SUMMER WORK

M. J. Taylor

P. Morra

J. Carroll

D. Carter

F. Pezzutto

W. Curtis

H. Brown

Geologist, Field Supervisor

Technician

54 Burnview Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario.

59 Maple Cresc., Orangeville, Ontario L9W 1X6

669 Albert Street West, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 1C7

262 Reynolds Street North, Apt. 12, Oakville, Ontario.

904-80 Richmond Street West, Toronto, Ontario M5H 2C7

/13.

lPage 13.

ll l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

MAPS

1:4000 SCALE

Nos. 20 V.L.F. Profiles

10 Magnetic Survey

19 V.L.F. Profiles

8 Magnetic Survey

12 V.L.F. Profiles

14 V.L.F. Profiles

17 V.L.F. Profiles

4 Magnetic Survey

16 V.L.F. Profiles

2 Magnetic Survey

18 V.L.F. Profiles

6 Magnetic Survey

Kaby Lake Area East

Kaby Lake Area East

Kaby Lake Area West

Kaby Lake Area West

Kaby Lake Area Northwest

Kaby Lake Area Northeast

Paint Lake Area East

Paint Lake Area East

Paint Lake Area West

Paint Lake Area West

Paint Lake Area Northeast

Paint Lake Area Northeast

f-'* --f" f

ybfv- V -.-.s

Mfnistrybf j Reprji t of WorkNatural lr- u - , r~ , - , :esources, (Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)12E13SEe0e6 2.5415 KABY LAKE

The Mining Act900

Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

Claim HoTder(s)

Township or Area

Prospector's Licence No.

Address

-Survey Company

... .,.Name and Address of Author (of Gco-Technical reportl

Date of Survey Urom 8/ to)

pay | tifc \ k \ Day J M : J

Total Miles of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey:using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here

,* ( V*f\'

O]v •ffi*vfcS^ #t^*9

Airborne Credjfi **

Nore: Special provisions

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

l/t-r- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

"biologicalw^

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim:ioi

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

^ 15

Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Reportfo/Work/

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix Number

L ^

Expend. Days Cr.

___ 'vl LnJ-n-t?^*'JH - . Prefix Number

rs+ -S

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Mirwstryof ;' Report of WorkNatural tesources (Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)# texail

The Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or ,.,-int. If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be entered in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.

Type of Survey(s)

CTairrrHoTderUY

—.-.fa?A#.Address

O

iTownship or Area


T- s'*- f f

Survey Company

sr-Date of Survey {Jrom 61 to)

Day

Survey Urc

tik.\ ffrName end Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Day j Mo. | Yr.



For first survey:


For each additional survey: using the same grid:


Man Days


RECEIVE:m 2 4 1983

MINING LANDS SECT

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

vL~t^ Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- electromagnetic

"^ ', - Magnetometer• •j

- Radiometric

- Other

p|D)ogical

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric ^ f ^,,, '

Days per Claim

^^

Days per Claim

--

Days per Claim

^-

J

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes powerjAriType of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)^L\^



Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

TBNumber

*r 7

73 7 7?

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

77

61? i:4? 723o

6?faL?.f

6tfoffo

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work,

,,

^r ^o'

Date Recorded Holder or^Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report oljWorkTt tortl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work

or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


f !Date Certified

fo-*{ -Certified by (Signature)

1362 (fi l/SI t

Mi."iistryof Report of Work{Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: - Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

Gjfc?tClaim Holder (s)

Township or Area

,Prospector's Licence No.

Address

SiSurvey Company Date of Survey (from 61 to) . , ,

03 h , o^ Jlot . f v . of , /v-Mo. Yr.

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)Day [ Mo. j Day J Mo. |


Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For first survey:Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)



Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here j tf

^ , * ' "

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

vCf- Electromagnet

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

^ - Electromagnet

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

Geochemical

ic

ic

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

2o

— — —

Days Clai

per m

-- - - -

Days per Claim



Calc ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S - 15

cTotal

Jays Credits

nstructions

Mining ClaimPrefix

Jg

Number

fa*?sif

6 i^^S fi(yti*0 ^ ) J

tnfofaO

6 i^o f (^ {bifofiGt ^

CtfrW, tfatf-o^C (o

Q^-oyfo-/S s o f tf \jCl"Q^ v J

(^ fJ*^2 J\Cf '

gg-~-^fo/VJ

(xfo?Wc^^/o^-/ J

o /- O f v^o

ro i J- ^2 K

Expend. Days Cr.

— ————

--— -—

——————

-- ———

Mining ClaimPrefix

78

- -..,.,.-

Number

^ j 7 q

64^0 fl "5 '^ y;o j j 26^ #36tfo?Qtf-

fjgf64^0^" P T-6 t/'-o j* f y^ l/ -Q X^L ^J^* " (j 0 *

6cf0y, o

64^7 ,

-"-^^'

— -- - ~ ---

i.

... --..... --

. .. . .. .. . .^.^.-


Expend. Days Cr.

-————

- —————

———— —

——————

-. ——— .

3?

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Datef3~

Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Repor/o/Work'l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


nep /o,/o.

Date Certified Certifie.d b

Min'istryof Natural .esources

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed


"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days O." columns.


'ciai"m"Holdor(sT

^....Address

Township or Area

.. ....Prospector's Licence No.

r- /2- f/—Survey Company

JjL^^ -Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technica! report)

Date of S •

Day j Mo.

urvey (from 81 to) -, o^ iTotal Miles of line Cut^i- J? i, i o ff JL)^

o. j V?/- Day (v?l rT"



For each additional survey? using the same grid:


Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here* * l

n \ \Q' \h\\ v

fJ^N^Airborne Credits


Geophysical

l-Vf'- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

tP* * "4 j ec t ro magnet i cEV*- Magnetometer

jO - Radiometric

- Other .

TSeological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

j^

^

^.. ...^ M ......^ _

Days per Claim

-- ----

Days per Claim

~~ — —



Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits Total

Total Expenditures Days Credits

Mining ClaimPrefix

'li

-

Number

tel~)Hlf j "7 ^ {i* y

{^ j \ s ' d

v j T -S 'J '

Vo s "t S i*''

\J ^ ~f f \ f^

Ci j "f' 3 \

t --* *-/

^ -i 3 W*

-l^f-45731. 3

1 ISJlr^3-7^66S

&13L fi

Expend. Days Cr.

—— —— —

- - ————

. . ————

IV Prefix

•^

ining Claim Number

63 J 5 f ciJ??J 'CZi3'? l

8w f6 5^7 r^/JV tt]/?//63-V^^j*

&VW

ffff-t'lVP'

^^1 ^^3-72Ji-

6H31 f^3 W 6^3^j,? 76^-7,9? riW??S\

...'.foW.L.

Expend. Days Cr.

- '— ——

——— ——

——————

——————

———— --

-- ————

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right,

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work. ^

Date Recorded Holder orAaent,(Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of/fybrk /l hereby certify that ! have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts sei forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


Date Certified Certified

A** \\Vv-83\ 'if- V*~*'- '"-* 1

Ministryof Report of WorkNatural ,~ , . . ~ . . ,Resources (Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act




— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s) Township or Area

Claim Hoider(s)

-Address

^Prospector's Licence No.

_Survey Company

.Date of Survey'Jjronr) ft to)

Day DayO Total Miles of line Cut

Name and' Address of Author (di Geo-Technical report)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

it*

Special Provisions




Man Days

Complete reverse sideand enter total(s) here ,rt

•.IV

e C^

AirbornF*tYedits


Geophysical

{/l ('Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

P- Electromagnet

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other.

tfS*^s|it?orogicai

Geochemical

ic

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

2^

k- - ---

s

- —

Days per Claim

- —

Days per Claim

— — ——




Total Expenditures

S -f- 15

CTotal

Jays Credits

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice, Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date Recorded H

f^-^'/b Ms

older or Agent (Signature)

&Z /rft*^(,s^Certification Verifying Report pf ytfork f

1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal or witnessed same during and/or after

Mining ClaimPrefix

77?

-~

Number

^3^36313*14fo j i J 'J

\Z-* 2 f \J J v

.. ...

................

-— ---' --•- •• —

- - - - - -

— - --- -- ' - --

Expend. Days Cr.

::

. . . . -..

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. fpartêcorded S Recorded j -jf^y\ /61 /(? -*J f

^Date Aj)B**WO SS'Vl'B'eorded âS'W/r


-- -- - — - •••-

-— ----------

. .. . ...,. ........

-- -- - - — ........-

- - - -- -- - -

. .. . .. .. ............-


Expend. Days Cr.

-.-.-.——

— ————

— .--.—

~ ————

— — —-

— ————

6

fining Recorder?. ~~/ f /Z X/

•B^B^jSSrec^tor ~J'— *^

m ( ^ ^Jand intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work its completion and the annexed report is true.


Date Certified , Certified/by Jî*flfTta"ture) S i f ^*^ (•'~Q~^sf~

Ministryof Report of WorkNatural lr, , . . ^ . . . Resources (Geophysical. Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Pic,, type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed


"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns,

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s) iTownsh

Claim Holder(s)

Address

Survey Company IDate of Survey (from 81 to, ^ \ ot v'ffll-t-j (;-i)(.- i ~( t. c? .'2 .îzi.ftfafS.Tt:: /-/Z j Day 1 Mo. | YrV Day

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

p or Aroa


l y , Total Miles of line Cut

tfo. 1 #"





Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter tofal(s) here

f\^

^t** c

M^^G ^'

Airborne fcÂ^s

Note: Special provisionscredits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

[Xcl^T^ Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

— - Electromagnetic'O— •'^Magnetometer

- Radiometric

^ - Other

e^Celife?

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

-~^-

Days per Claim

- ..—.. ...

-— ~-- --

Days per Claim






Days Credits



T8(

-l

f 6

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix

rtNumber

t- 3 73/3

A'^

Expend. Dayt Cr.

otal number of mining 'claims covered by this report of work.

Date Recorded HolderoÂg

Certification Verifying Report

ent (Signature) l

^ ll hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


d : T?tytA# f o^rDate Certified Certified by (Siflnatyjfl)

1362 fSI/9)

Ministry of Natural

nsourcesOntan.

RpportofWork j -(Geophysical, Geological, fi foy Geochemical and Expenditures) -d 'l

-A Act

Instructions: - Please type or print.— tf number of mining claims traversed


"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expond. Days Gr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of

.^-Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area


Address

~ 60Survey Company


of Survey (from 61 to) , o-. OV- {t- i C'V' f*-

J jvfe. J K J.pay:J.fl*.J.?T.

Date of Survey Jfrom 61 to)

Day



For first survey:


For each additional survey:! using the same grid:


Man Days


RFfEP'|\ L. V* *r ' *

JAN 2 4 19*

AflNING LANDS iAirborne Credits


.

Geophysical

yUt~- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

; -- *. Radiometric

- Other

3Geological

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Days per Claim

iz— — —

Days per Claim

- — ——

Days perClaim


Expenditures (excludesType of Work Performed




Days Credits

S


Mining ClaimPrefix

T8Number

7 r6 3.2

6 3

(0^1100

Expend. Days Cr.


637/0!637/0**

7 f/ f

//-7

6 57/2 y

637/2- 1

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work,

Date

Certification Verifying Report o/^ork /PC

M4ning*R6Cord6rv* *J/^fjfijf^r

Braric"h Direclo"r*



^ttJttife

Date Certified Certified by (Signature)

Ministry of Natural

jsources


The Mining Act




— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Surveyfs)

___Claim Holder (s)

Township or Area

/t.Prospector's Cicence No.

/YAddress

Survey Companyy-.—. __ ___ i _ _____________ .— ...-- _ _

Date of Suryev.Jfrom a to) ^ y,

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)s^iMf j. J j



For first survey:

includes line cutting)



Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total(s) here —

oFCF^fiv^n 3 \ ^

tftttiNG LANDS steAirborne Credits


Geophysical

'i-r'- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

}v - Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

fJsJtJtbgical

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Jo

2*

Days per Claim

—— ———

——————

Days per Claim





Total Expenditures

S ^15

Total Days Credits

n

Instructions Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

TSNumber

63 W 32-

XJ is ~7 *~' '

63

Expend. Days Cr.


C637

637 W'

Expend. Days Cr.


Date Recorded Holder^or Agent (Signature)

4frzZZ

For Office Use 0/ilyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

i, Date Approved as Recorded

Certification Verifying Report/o? WOJK

*^-T*

Branch Director



/j. /D 0- o*//Date Certified Certified by (Signature)

1362 (81/9)

Ministry of Natural

^sources


The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining clunns traversed


"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Day? Cr." columns.

— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of SurveyU)

Claim" Holder(s)

.--..-.. .1. Address

Township or Area

.Prospector's Licence No.

T- s 2. t f

——.Survey Company

Jtlt+r g?.i ..Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technicsl report)

t/s/j66te of Survey Ifrom 81 to)

O"/ a 2

Day . Day l Mo.

^^Total Miles of Fine Cut


For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid: ,


Man Days


m f 1 nf, t ^ B s*

f. f* tt \ j **Rfe^"JKU**^3

jf\t4\W^Airborne Credits


Geophysical

iA^f^- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic"typ ' Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

iir—

Days per Claim

-...,,.-..—

— — -- ——

Days per Claim


Expenditures {excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed




Days Credits


PrefixMining Claim

NumberExpend. Days Cr.

_ Mining Claim Prefix Number

Expend. Days Cr,

ToTal number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

Datef3-of-

Recorded Holder^pr Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Reporf o/Worl/

For Office Use 0/ilyTotal Days Cr. Recorded o /f 3

te Approvd as Recorded Branch Director



0e ~ f0Date CertTfied

f3 -Of"

Certified by (Signature)

Ministry of Natural

sourcesOntario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical anci Expenditures)

The Mining Act

^ o..**!Instructions: — Please type or print.

- If number of mining claims traversedexceeds space on this form, attach a iist.

Note: — Only days credits calculated in the"Expenditures" section may be entered,in the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.


ciaVm Hoider(s)

Address

Township or Area

Prospector's Cicence No.

Survey Company


Date of Survey (from 81 to) fox f t--r v* fj-, 01 fi. 4 c- f ft-

Day Mo. Yr. Day Mo. l Yr.



For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (Thisincludes line cutting)



Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter totallsLharet'L \

-.r f f* W *" Utv^"*

n \ \9lfi3

\AflOS S*CMftVWWG

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisionscredits do not applyto Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

(/if- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

2o. —— -^-- ___

Z c*

^. ^., ^ ^ _

Days per Claim

Days perClaim

- - ——— —






Days Credits


Mining ClaimPrefix

TBNumber

63 T/ f

L

...J ^•y.T*. Ii7{r(6 H t

O7//7

ci j H. s0-7^7

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining Claim Prefix Number

77?

637/72,

U7/7I"6J7/74

Expend. Days Cr.


Date Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report c/f/Vork '

For Office Use Onl/Total Days Cr. Recorded

t

Daje Recorded 1

2^ '4s*3pine Approved/as Recorded

Mining Recorder . -f"/ - ' ': Uf^/Sl" //y-''-"

Branch Qfrector

1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


Date Certified*a - a-7 7^,A/^ o^T Sf&i-c?

Certified by (Signature)

- f'C ^V/^v/^——— ' 77 f y t ——

Ministryol Natural

sourcesOntar


The Mining Ace


exceeds space on this form, attach z list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns,

- - Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

..-.. .....Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area


T- /2- ifAddress

—— C?Survey Company

14 c A"' ~~ "' "Date of Survey (from A to)

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)Day j Mo. | Tr. Day |

O_

Total Miles of Tine Cut"


For first survey:




Man Days ^

and dfttelt.QtaPfs} here

^^ ^

Avx\\^*

Airborne Credits


Geophysical

\fi,(~- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

•C-* - Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days CI a

perm

2^}v

DaysClai

per m

Days per Claim



Cak ulation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

S -s- 15

lTotal

}ays Credits

nstructions

Mining ClaimPrefix

75

**

Number

CHiSci

6; 7 r f?

O7^V Ci'JMs'

tew-3

tTJitfd- j 7 2?*^"~ ."" , |

d."' -j? *y ''*" v J'

'^?73^ x

Expend. Days Cr.

—— ————

- ---.--

——j

-4; fr

Mining ClaimPrefix'[-B

Number

Q13W^Ui SbJlJlf-

SjjfW3l 0

6? 7 7 j 677??^&21 3 3 )

- —

(^ly ''J f

W3'2 6tZfri '}63/^.yfO-?^3*i

•—

CtlZ-t/c

6~) 7 3 1/ 6J y9V2- ^

tljliti

6 3 W S"L&Z+C


Expend. Days Cr,

—————

————— .

——— . .^

'

- —————

——————

tfSTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date

- c cRecorded Holder or Aflent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of(1 hereby certify that 1 have a personal or witnessed same during and/or after

Name and Postal Address of Person

and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report its completion and the annexed report is true.

of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work

Certifying

f (j cf ~ f f /(( ( /-//^^iV/) ^Sl C^/t^-^J f C-' jt~\j SV 1 'J cJ/V/ 'i S~*^f * t yDate Certified

fc ' 1

Certified by (Signature) ,

'- " f (, /t C/ /&1/ ( c^' - 7 7 ' -1

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

RECEIVEDMAR 71983

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.LANDS SECTION

Type of Survey(s).

Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)—

Survey Company^ Author of Report.

Address of Author.

Covering Dates of Survey_

Total Miles of Line Cut —(linccutting to office)6-t

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days {includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

-, , . , GeophysicalVt-f-.

DAYS per claim

Z"

—Radiometric.-Other————-

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:.Authoy/f Reponf or Agent)ODt O]

Res. Geol.. __Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

tt

I

633102-

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

IND

UC

ED P

OLA

RIZ

ATI

ON

RE

SIS

TIV

ITY

2 2

2 S*

? 2

H2

rt

rt

i

-i

n

v3

a si

3 S

S- j

o 3

3 p

lg.!

^ s-

s- 3

irt

w

wT

13

-i

s w

?3

2.

vc CL

3

o era l

! l i

k *"i

D '

3 C

0

0

H

cS 5"

^

^. rt

3 ~

3'

3 o

o'

33

rt

r-*- 3 rt

t i

T

O 3 5' DSJ

^

"^

iI-*

rt

rt

rr^

-—

bO^^

C

C

. rt

rt

3

30

0

ia 0 3 01 3'

GR

AV

ITY

Srt" < w M

O

O c

W o rt 3 Cu o"

8 o'

O

O

3S

S "i

•?

PT

-lrt

n o' 3 C

ft X CL

o

o OC B n

ELE

CT

RO

MA

GN

ET

IC

MA

GN

ET

IC:

5* -

2 o*

P 9

sS

rt

rt

O

w1

W

ys

as

^g

j*

o

s;

s:

q-

i S

1 3

s 8

i2

S "

-5

1

^

1en

"^

3 B) s/* c rt o. 1 ^ ' 4

^TV . ***. — ~

^* "i

^.-

7 5: *-t

^^

't S*1 p f^

^1

\f\

\^

"T

p

^

X/T

T

rtL

^*T

T

^ i r-

t-

rt

| *\

^ D\

3"

S- TO

^

5" i

w 0

. H V* ,I

N

o Q

-

^

ri LJ

"3 a; 3. rt" 5' rt

3 S

- o"

f 1 s* ^ ? *s ^

S9 ?

H ^

s s

5 1

!S?

S? l.

3as

a)

o

r-

r*

O

^

o'

o'

S3

3 3

H H

i' M

iBS

—

. r*

. en

3

3

D-

STQ

- rt

0

3^

-^

Q.

r*

1 2

c ~ rr o g -vyi i^^

-

o y

™ z

l l

l. i

l g l

fl

~

S 5 o

•x

O •o

5'

crt

3

n l

fO.

o o. 5' l

•i rt o C! CL

a:

H l Z g k O

H t

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument________________________________________ Range.Survey Method -——-——————-———-—————-—-————---————^^———^-—.

Corrections made.

RADJOMETKIC

Instrument ————

Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)^—————-——-—-———^—^^^^——...—-.—.—-—--—-——^^^..^——.

Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count. Size of detector-———-—---.--..^^^^————-———.-.————..—.-^^..^...-.——.—.^^^

Overburden ____________________^_^_______________^^__^________(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WKLL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey——-——-—.——-—————————————————.

Instrument __________ ,^^M^————————Accuracy-——.—--^-^-^-———-————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AJRliORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s) ————

Instrumcnt(s) ———^—{specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-—————^———.————.———(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used_________^—^—-^——-—————^——.—.—---^——

Sensor altitude.

Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude__________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area___________________________Over claims only.

K)

^ CN

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material) Average Sample Weight————————

Method of Collection_________

Soil Horizon Sampled.

Horizon Development-

Sample Depth_____ Terrain————————

Drainage Development____________ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

SAMP],K I'RKI'ARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis^———

.AN ALYTJCAL MK Values expressed in: per cent CH

p. p. m. p. p. b.

O D

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory Analysis

No. ____________Extraction Method-

Analytical Method. Reagents Used__

Commercial Laboratory (.

Name of Laboratory—

Extraction Method——

Analytical Method__

Reagents Used ————

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

Ontario



File.


l TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area.

Claim Holder(s)^

K48V LAK6.

Survey Company

Author of Report

Address of Author.

Covering Dates of Survey..

Total Miles of Line Cut_(linecutting to office)


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

vL. -Electromagnetic.—Magnetometer—.

—Radiometric——

—Other——————

DAYS per claim

Geological

Geochemical-AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. -Electromagnetic , . Radiometric

DATE!

(enter days per claim)

Sir.NATnRF. ;Autho/of Report fa Agent

Res. Geol._____Previous Surveys

File No. Type

.Qualifications.

Date Claim Holder


(prefix)

M tt

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval——

Profile scale -———.Contour interval.

-Number of Readings ^

.Line spacing ___/Z-

/11C,

St* ^

W XO

Instrument.

Accuracy — Scale constant.

Diurnal correction method.

Base Station check-in interval (hours).

Base Station location and value ———

UKH

H Wy, o

o rtH U W

Instrument

Accuracy .

Method:

Frequency

I/UP

^ration

ition

i measured..

* r^2 Fixed transmitter

W*

* .2- r?.t CD Shoot back D In line

(specify V.L.F. station)

d Parallel line

H*—*

< Pi O

InstrumentScale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

y,oH N

O

Q W U

Q

H *—iC/3Wrt

Instrument ——————-—-.Method l l Time Domain Parameters — On time ...,

-Off

l l Frequency Domain _ Frequency ______ Range -——^^^—

— Delay time.

— Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing

: of electrode

so

~ S

SKU'J'OTKNTJAL

Instrument.———————————————————————————————————————— Range.Survey Method -^—————-————-—-—^————————————————--.^—^——-——-.—

Corrections made.

RADIOMKTKIC

Instrument ———^Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)^—-—-—.—^-^———--.—-——^———.——..-—————^——....-^ Height of instrument______________________________Background Count.

Size of detector.—-.————-—-—-.—^^.^————--——^—^————..———.——-————^-—.

Overburden ——-.—^-—----^————.^—..—.—.-^——^^——-—.—.-.^.^--^^.^^—-.—.—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

pTllKRS (SK)SMIC, ))R11,L WKLL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey———^.^———-.————.^^—-—^—-——-——.

Instrument ^-———--.^——.——-—..^^^-.———^—^

Accuracy.^——————————————.^—————,Parameters measured.


AIRBORNKSURVKYS

Type of survey(s)——-— Instrumcnt(s) ——————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy———-^—————-^—^^^^.

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^————————-—^...-—-——-—-..—.——-.—-—.———

Sensor altitude-


Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing^ Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY ~ PROCEDURE RECORD


Total Number of Samples- Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight_______

Method of Collection————————


Horizon Development. Sample Depth————— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development—^^——————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

D DD

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ^-————..^——.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (-

Name of Laboratory.—. Extraction MfthoH.

Analytical

Reagents Used

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GcneraL General.

Ontario



File.


TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETiti*

RECEIVEDMAR 71983

NINO LANDS SECTION

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)^

6 go PHYSICAL

Survey Company_ Author of Report —^ Address of Author ——Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut^.(linecutting to office)


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

—Electromagnetic.

DAYSper claim

Zo

-Other.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.


SIGNATURE:.Author Vf Report /or Agent

Res. Geol.. ^Qualifications.Previous Surveys



(prefix) (number)

TOTAL CLAIMS-

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale____

Contour interval.

UKH

H W X,O

Instrument

If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

-Number of Readings —-—

.Line spacing_____ '2.OIII* *-

f foo y

Accuracy — Scale constant

Diurnal correction method Base Station check-in interval (hours) Base Station location and value ^__

u

x,o

H O WJ W

Instrument

Coil configuration

Coil separation — Accuracy .————.

Method: Frequency———

Parameters measured.

JZf Fixed transmitter D Shoot back (JMtfMGro*i W'*

Q In line CD Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

H

rt O,

Instrument

Scale constant

Corrections made.

Base station value and location

Elevation accuracy.

OHH

H

M*™(

rt

Oi

Q Wo

W

Instrument -—^—^—————. Method D Time Domain

Parameters — On time —— — Off time .—-—— Delay time ———.

-' Integration time.

Power.

Electrode array.

spacing

of electrode

r~l Frequency Domain

— Frequency -———-

..... Range ________

f?** f? fifS±S9 16 rf fttlftt? ststt? il ?f±t? 1 fftf ? o01 rt?? r~'~

o

gas?j

J tt* t?

ttti iUt 1 1?

l lt

ttuw tgt'tf)

o tt tt9) s ti

s tit wtttt?

i

b Kit)s

SK),F POTENTIAL

Instrument________________________________________ Range.Survey Method _____________________________________'.—^—————.

Corrections made.

RADIOMLTRJC

Instrument ———.

Values measured

Energy windows (levels)-———-—---——.----—————————-^——^-———.—.-———————..—Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count. Size of detector——————-————.—.-----^—---————-^^—-——--—.—.-—.-——.—-—.

Overburden .-.--,--————-—.^—..—..^—.-^^^———....—..-.——..—.-.———---—.———-.—(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WKLI .LOGGING KTC.)

Type of survey———.——————-^—^———————

Instrument __________.——^—^——————-————

Accuracy____________________________Parameters measured.


AIR15OKNL; SURVLYS

Type of survey(s)-———

Instrumcnt(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy————.—.—..-—-^——.——(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used^—————^——.^.——————--—————.————.——

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area___________________________Over claims only.



Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.


Average Sample Weight——————

Method of Collection—————————


Horizon Development.

Sample Depth^————Terrain ——————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL .METHODS Values expressed in: per cent CD

p. p. m. Q p. p. b. D

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circlc)

Field Analysis (.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————

S AMI'1 ,E I'RICl'AR A'l'lON (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis-————

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (-

Name of Laboratory-— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method..

Reagents Used -^———-

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

Ontario



File.


TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSION1LANDS

Type of Survey(s) — Township or Area^.

Claim Holder(s)^—

Survey Company- Author of Report.

Address of Author.

Covering Dates of Survey..

Total Miles of Line Cut^

Pee sz/r-(linccutting to office)


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical

—Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

-Radiometric.

-Other-——

Geological.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:. ft-o/-J/AutKo/

r/**of Report or Agent

Res. Geol. —— .Qualifications.Previous Surveys



(prefix) numb

1 3 y foo

6*37 YO 3' C W* f

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (5/79)

IND

UC

ED P

OLA

RIZ

ATI

ON

RES

ISTI

VIT

Y

H w

S J?

S* 2

t3

n o

'-5

r-

r*

,

EL 3

o — i

Q,

a.

n

o n

"^

VI

Q

L i-

^O

CT

Q

1 i i

a *

S 3

|. S

5 1

^ S

S ^

f3

D s

3 0

0

0

H g

2.

^

s 3

TO

-^

s-

5'

!L

1

1D

rt—

. 3' -5

s T ***l

^ o' 3 S

"B

^ Dl^

rf

kw4

^

Z o'

^ -g

-2o

C C

O

O3

3n

oJ

.

jB•^

~*^- o' 1 5"

i 1

GR

AV

ITY

ELEC

TRO

MA

GN

ETIC

2 o g w

o

o •^ a. o

W o o o s o'

O o "^ o o

on S o o 3l o

3 S

CL o

> o o

005"

2.

2. l B o

! 1 lil

!B

-5 ^

^ :

3 •s s r? O. ^"

^*

N

^ Sxt ^

Liv

^*

^1

V

0*

s fk •J

C-

^^

-^

fi

41 R i i.

p:

OXS"

. S

o ;

3

r

H- ^.t

s ^

•c-

^

*^

t-% ^;

N

^ D

SI

on

P o

s.

2- cr W o TT-

K* ^ ^9n D *3 M fts S s

o H K* f A

c

\

o fc ?

MA

GN

ETIC

f"^

13

On

^^Q

o S^

cW

W

O

li*

3"

3

S,

i—

gS

8 5'

o

S- o^o'c

roo-ii-ii^

g '

B o

s? s

1. s

i :.

s s-

SR

j CO

O

"^

t3

r—

-- r*

*^

-jr-*

- i—

v O

*^

J ("P

f*

O

^

o'

o'

S S

233-i

I 1 |

l-

- rf

3

r,

S 3-

i

Sft

j ~

. ri

W3

3 3-

{f

O.

o O

3

^

"-1

Q.

r*^

^

\ C

O C * -fr. J Q\,

-K () 0 f?v 0 "^ W t

•*"^ sj f,. n

1 r* *^K

.

•N^ o^ ^v r v ff-

a V A

"

2 r * ^ i t*} "^ ^

-

o' 0 j- P

3 ^

pj

ft3^^

*^-

\ ? VI O

k X CN

0 W5

NJ ^ ? 14w -a r

r z

5'

cn

3ri

"S

0

M

W

~i2.

o

3

-^^^

Ofl

Ng

0 0 **S o.

5'

V V 0 ^ H ^

rQ EA •J 0

1C

I5C

"C li

o W O

•c

O H

P)

O Z MM oO

f

o \

s ^1 o

to

f 3^ 7

SKLFl'OTKNTJAL

Instrument___________________________________________ Range.Survey Method—————-———^^—^——-————————-——————-—...——.————.—

Corrections made.

RADiOMi.TRJCInstrument.———Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)——-————-——^^———.——.——-—.——-—————.—..——.—.—..——Height of instrument.—^-^^^^^^—————-——-—..——-——————.Background Count,Size of detector -^^--^^__^^^_______-___________-__________^^^_^__^^^__

Overburden -—-———^-—-—^——————--—-.^-—-—-—^—-——————————-—...—..—.(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTJILRS (SKJSMIC, DRILL WKLL LOGGING K'JC.)

Type of survey^^^—^^—^——————————————

Instrument ___________________________Accuracy^-^^—^————~———————————Parameters measured.


A1RBORN1.SURVLYS

Type of survcy(s)-———

Instrumcnt(s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy—^——————————-————^—(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used______________..—-————-—^^—^——^^^.^-^

Sensor altitude-


Aircraft altitude______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area___________________________Over claims only.





Average Sample Weight———————

Method of Collection________

Soil Horizon Sampled-

Horizon Development. Sample Depth————

Terrain————^———


Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

CD CH d

Cu, Pb,

Others—


Field Analysis (~Extraction Method.

Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory Analysis

No. .——————-——

SAMl'l ,}t. PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis,-———

Extraction Method.

Analytical Method.

Reagents Used__

Commercial Laboratory Name of Laboratory

Extraction Method—

Analytical Method Reagents Used,———

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ontario



File.

RECEIVEDTO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT

FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.,,,,.,,,.,,,,..^,,i,..™,,——..—————————————————————MINING IJANDS SECTION

'M983

Type of Survey(s) — Township or Area —

Claim Holder(s)——MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED

List numerically

Survey Company- Author of Report.

Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey..

Total Miles of Line Cut^,

PCS- t *?g l - 5g07 - S*)tl,(linecutting to office)

2*1_______


ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

DAYS per claim

2o-Magnetometer.-Radiometric—

-Other—————

Geochemical.AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric

DATE:.


SIGNATURE:.

TL....(prefix) number)

S3

' l"

Auth^/fcf Reporter Agent

Res. Geol.. .Qualifications.Previous Surveys


x

TOTAL CLAIMS-

837 (5/79)

IND

UC

ED P

OLA

RIZ

ATI

ON

RES

ISTI

VIT

YW

W

o a 3 D.

O

3 Q.

O

3 O

o 0 Q.

3n

fs

o 3 3 n

l s o

3

O

3"

O

CL

T D

3*

C

O

O

H*"

^ *^

1 f-

t~

K*

*~ - o o w D ^

n c o O

o 3 6)

GR

AV

ITY

l 3

O vi umei

Elcva O

O C S o

B;

vi Ci o 3 2 rj a; 3 fi

rs o o' 3 3 K

fi.

O

O o 3

Jfc.

LJM

JlK

OM

AG

NE

TIC

V

fAn

vp

TT

^

*3

*T^

5*^

^^

fj

fj

^^

BJ

^

^*

X,

*

7

i Ills"!

s i

s- 1

1 1

iV

? 2 o 6J Vi C O CL Cb

—•V ^ .

^* i^

w^" 0

. •7 <

v, r

"Nl

T1

^wl

Q

^

O

J^

3

ON .

^ ^ ^\ S* s ^ (\

O d. f-*- •n 65

C 3

*

V)

\S\

r-*-

•v.

n

\ ^D

^v ^ o 0 cr

v s

"fc.

^

^v ^ D 1 L

J 5* M S- ST i 5' n

6J

crq

2-C

. C

\-v x. ov- H K*

i ^

3

r* o' 3

V\

f K\ i ? "

~ ~"

^ '•

'-^'^

•tf-

i^-i^

'^,

P

5? SP

*s3

g3 a

^ 3

I g,

g. |

s s

| g

^ g-S

rT

^^S

ss

2 S

3- 2

?w

~o3

5'

E.

S S,

5'

o" i

^

3 S

3

3

3

'

8" S-

1. S*

E s

g s-

^*

7^

f*3

5'

3 2

t"

g-

r^-

tn

Q-

o<

"^

&J

^i

•III

wc

i—o

-—

?T

*

\ *

O en

J* 3i 0 o es 0 fcf r 4 T\ * oT 0 \ 0 0

*w

^ 1 J

*j o o. s\ i 7^ o ^ ^v * y^ T 1 f-

3 r-*- H ? i

f. --. f

,3 e ^ S

^

\ o'

o J k x i

2 t/)

<

r*

&J

ft)

•V O f tt N.

V \ ^

o' V)

N {A *

J ^ J -,

^w N o^

5:"

s I

Vt

Q-

•V

"O

^

?2.

o3

-*i

5^C

Q ^

t 1 h ^

r;

O.

G

K) 0 J J K

3 q /i C •si N

4

a K ^

O

o w o C/5 O r w o z o r o

x

t* ^

o

\ \

SKLF POTENTIAL

Instrument^-————-—-^—————-—-—-—-————^—-^————^—-————. Range.Survey Method _____^_________________________________^^^_^__

Corrections made.

RADJOMI'TRJC

Instrument.——-Values measured

Energy windows (levels)_________,-——.———..-....—-.^^—.———.^^.^.———————Height of instrument_____________________________Background Count.

Size of detector———-———-—^-^^—————————.——^——-——-..————-....—...——

Overburden .———-———-.——.——.-————.—-.^..^.^—^—..—.—————..—..—^^^—--—(type, depth — include ootcrop map)

pTJILRS (Sl.LSMIC, DRILL WLLL LOCOING K'J'C.)

Type of survey—.——-^.--—-^^---———-———————.

Instrument _________________________ Accuracy^^—^.—^^...-.—.^..—.-...——-——-^—.^^-.^Parameters measured.


A1R15ORNLSURVLYS

Type of survey(s)——^.

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy—^^—^^—————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used_____________.——————————————.^^——.—.Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude__________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area___________________________Over claims only.





Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth————Terrain,———————


ANAi^j;iCALJVlEmOI)SValues expressed in: per cent [~l

Dnper cent p. p. m. p. p. b.

Cu, Pb,

Others_


Field Analysis {-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used__

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. ^———-^^^

SAMPLE PRKI'ARAIION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ^———

Extraction Method- Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory^.. Extraction Mrfhnd

Analytical Method —— Reagents Used ,^——^^—

.tests)

.tests)

.tests)

GeneraL General.

Ministry ofNaJuraJ.Resources

Ontari

Technical Assessment Work Credits Date

1983 09 14

File2.5415

Mining Recorder's Report of Workfto. 26-83

Recorded Holder

FARAKEL COMPANYTownship or Area

ELMHIRST

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim Mining Claims Assessed

Geophysical

Electromagnetic.

Magnetometer —

Radiometric__

20

20

Induced polarization .

Other ————————

.days

. days

. days

. days

.days

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Attested" column

Geological ___________________ days

Geochemical __________________ days

TB 637272-73 637275 to 82 637284637287 to 300 637303 to 10 incl 637312 to 15 "

For electromagnetic onlyTB 637286

637301

Man days C]

Special provision 1/1

Airborne Lil

Ground 0

fi Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

ED Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

10 days credit magnetometerTB 637274

637286 637301

10 days credit electromagneticTB 637274

5 days credit magnetometer

TB 637285 637302 637311 637316

5 days credit electromagnetic

TB 637285 637302 637311 637316

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

jistry of ral

ourcesOntario


1983 09 14

File2.5415

Mining Recorder's Report of WorkKio. 26-83

Recorded Holder

FARAKEL COMPANYTownship or Area

RICKABY TOWNSHIP,

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 20Electromagnetic *- v rtays

?oMagnetometer . , " days

Other . rtays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Attested" column

Geological . days

Genrhemiral rlays

Man days O Airborne d

Special provision 0 Ground 0

[~l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 632073 to 78 632272 632275 637093 to 110 incl 637112 to 134 incl 637142 637211 to 18 incl 637226 to 28 incl 637231 to 36 incl 637239 to 44 incl 637246 to 57 incl 637402 to 07 incl

For magnetometer onlyTB 637111

For electromagnetic onlyTB 637237

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

10 days credit, magnetometerTB 632273-74

637135 637237

10 days credit electromagneticTB 632273-74

637111 637135


l—l not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontari


1983 09 14

File2.5415

Mining Recorder's Report of Workfto. 26-83

Recorded HolderFARAKEL COMPANY

Township or AreaWALTERS TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical 20

Electromagnetic. days

20

Rfldinmntric , days

Induced pnlari?atinn , days

Other days

Section 77 (19) Sec "Mining Claims Attested" column

Genlogiral days

GeOCherntCpl . days

Man days CD Airborne CD

Special provision 0 Ground &D

^ Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

CD Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

TB 637147 to 54 incl 637157 to 63 " 637169 to 92 " 637258 to 67 " 637269 to 71 " 637283 637317 to 19 incl 637323 to 41 " 637343 to 46 "

For electromagnetic only

TB 637342

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims10 days credit, magnetometer 5 days credit, magnetometer 5 days credit S electromagnetic X electromagnetic magnetometer

TB 637143 TB 637144 TB 637342 637145-46 637155 637156 637165 637164 637167 637166 637168


1 — 1 not sufficiently covered by the survey lAl Insufficient technical data filed

TB 637268

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

CfkBLC "HURONTO' TELEX O6.23381

TELEPHONE 362-1474-5-6 AREA CODE 416

HILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITEDSUITE 9O4

BO RICHMOND STREET WEST TORONTO. ONT., CANADA

M5H EC7

RECEIVEDtoAH V 1983

MINING LANDSMarch 7, 1983

The Ministry of Natural Resources, Whitney Block, Room 6450, Queen's Park, Toronto, Ontario

Re: Farakel Company Claims

Dear Sirs:

Enclosed are two reports with accompanying maps covering the V.L.F. and Magnetometer Survey completed on the Farakel Company claims in the Jellicoe Area in 1982.

Also enclosed are 5 technical data statements covering thiswork.

Yours very truly,


'C. V/. Goettler, P.Eng. rEnclosures

1983 03 11 2.5415

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

He have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 632073 et al 1n the Townships of Kaby Lake, Walters, Rickaby and Elmhirst.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioH7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:se

cc: Farakel Company Suite 4000 601 Jefferson St Houston, Texas USA 77002

cc: Hill, Goettler DeLaporte Limited Toronto, Ontario Attn: Mr. G.W. Goettler.

2.5415August 10, 1983

H111, Goettler, DeLaporte LtdSuite 90480 Richmond Street WestToronto, OntarioM5H 3C7

Attention: G.W. Goettler

Dear Sir:

Please provide a resume of qualifications as outlined on the attached.

When submitting this Information please quote File 2.5415.

For further Information, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at {416)965-1380.

Yours very truly.

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

S. Hurst:mc

End.

C.J.BUE. "HURON7O" TELEX O6-2338I

TELEPHONE 362-1474-5-6 AREA CODE 416

HILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITEDSUITE 9O4

8O RICHMOND STREET WEST TORONTO. ONT., CANADA

M5H 2C7

August 23, 1983.'

Mr. E.F. Anderson,Director,Land Management Branch,Whitney Block,Queen's Park,Toronto, Ontario.M7A 1W3

Dear Mr. Anderson:

Re: File 2.5415

With regard to my qualifications as requested in your letter of August 10, 1983, I submit the following:

1. I graduated from the University of Toronto in 1950 with the degree of Bachelor of Applied Science as a Mining Geologist.

2. I have worked at my profession for 33 years.

3. I have been a member of the Association of Professional Engineers of the Province of Ontario since 1952.

l hope that this information is sufficient for your requirements.

Yours truly,


RECEIVEDx G.W."'Goettler, P.Eng.

MINING LANDS SECTION

ntario


1983 09 14

Your file:

Our file: 2.5415


Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

Anderson Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

R. Pichette:sc

Ends:

cc: Farakel Company Suite 4000601 Jefferson Street Houston, Texas, USA 77002

CG Hill, Goettler Delaporte LtdToronto, Ontario. Attn: Mr. G.W. Goettler,Mr. G.H. FergusonMining X Lands Commissioner,Toronto, Ontarior/ L- e .^^^ ..^^^^^^


Notice of Intent

for Technical ReportsOntario

1983 09 14

2.5415

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/5)

1983 10 19

26-83

Z. W l


Dear Madam:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on mining claims TB 632073 et al 1n the Townships of Kaby Lake, Walters, Rickaby and Elmhirst

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) aorvey assessment v/ork credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated September 14, 1983 have been approved as of the abovedate.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

E. F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

R. P1chette:mc

Encl.

cc: Farakel Company Suite 4000601 Jefferson Street Houston, Texas USA 77002

cc: Resident Geologist Thunder Bay, Ontario

r®Ontario


GeotechnicalReportApproval

File

-S Ml S

Mining Lands Comments

: Geophysics

Comments

] Approved [ ) Wish to see again with corrections

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

[~J Approved [ | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

[ j Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsSiflnature

[ JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

k AB Y

....im.-mj&bVf/

^yWV

—

^\*\±': w

i::

/y x*

MK; /"

...4-.-

k

S*

j/r

7/2Q/g

K

y* fc

T*

s

X1

M

x1 /i

I-A

K

XV

XV

M

w

y

'err?0' l y(*

'LW

V -

m Z j r

' m

ra s Q

TYR

OL

LAK

E

G-1

41

o n CO m

o i

WF

10

- -

-9-

m-

— —

l -f

\ —

—

—

—^—

—

—

LAP

IER

RE

LA

KE

G

-65

D i en (D

(D

O ^

(D

p"

2.

O ^

W1-

fs

a300.

o

z

o m U) m

3) m

fr

O

w O

m 3

) m

o l z D

t-

C

(A oo

K E

i? o x II o

w

^

.**

A

^-

m

Z

Z

t-' r

~~

r Z

~ z

> -

- x

J* ™

-r

^5

^5

-Z

V-

- -

S y-

y

i s

s ?

c *

z ~ '

2 z

x

is f

fi Ul

z

l l

i \

lil I-

~ r-,

r/T

n-

rn-X

V

O

O

O 2 im .ZO

i',

5

t/52

C o

C•™

—

^ ** '

^9

*

2

5

x

F*

r- i ^

-c c

-* ^

2i

-co

-* i

en

-B*

(P

O

O z o k, o* g

i vi

TJ t.

z^

O

rn

W

O

^ Z

m

Z

^

O

S K

"i

l?p

x *

rM

^

P

-

-

30

f*

O C

z o

.•o X

O

2

-n

O

?

w

>

'K H CP

(P

O

L '

o* o

**

-n m r

O)

O o

•D

ZE

ol-

3P

r H

T1

W*

O)*

o • l si y n 2

3D

®

2

-n

o

3)

fr 2

O

Co

C

3DI

J

o

z om

(ft

5 *5

X3D

(A 5

S5 :u 5

to c

m

a

O*

C m T)

Z T)

(A Z o

4 •^ w

I xjz

, n

o

Q

m

o o o l oS (D

ELM

HIR

ST

TWP

^v

S

L' f

fc

G-1

62

/\

ri

*

N

VD

^

r\ o ^

JiA

* *

.' \

* 3:

L,

^

Q

Lt~

-^

^

^

7^3 ;^

\

V

s 7 c

? r.

V

v

s,

o K•r

f

.TC

.-.,.

i *to

5 ~

l ~~

l

x^

^^

1 l

w

"*

iJ *

*

l "*

~

l'"

*—

——

- —

——

—

—L

——

- —

——

- ^

—--

-—

——

^—

. ^

.——

——

I—

—-

.——

—

——A

——

^.

——

——

j--

——

——

—

——

—f

—-

.——

——

——

4-

——

. .—

— —

m

t'3S

,''

Ps" fo

"2

, 13

V*'

3* "

'3*

,ol*

T

|o

l ^

[~T

.*-r

,T-;

—:T

f"3r

s"

*

K S

u.

MtV

lK!^

;i*

!K

-C'^

AlT

Jk'^

t'f T

^S'jl

1! '

^"

'l

l l—

— -

I——

—

—

——

—

TS

'—

——

' -Z

3)—

—

——

l "S

" —

—

—.

"^

-—

—

——

' ^

"

——

—

—

m

——

—

—"

4*.

^^

Ol

-.1

O.

v'-f

"

o,

!-*

a1

M ~

;-- i ~

' -

i"

~ ir

f '

-"^

3r

*H

te '

K

*33

c^

r* "v

?c ir

i *

^ '^

i1* ^

i*--|

^"5~

H^"

-p

-T3^

~~3^

J~sY

TJa

"!^

'L

;JC

^

\ ^^

L t

W ^

^ ^^

. U

^

l il

A

l ^^

^te

1 ^

^^

^te

M

l

^5^

l

tJt

~~~~

^

^

^

"

*fl

M'

— ***

3 T

w^'

S'sC

si^

"!^

"'^

K"'~

^'^ - ' *

?. j

W5- .1

1 -

J " . J- -- L

0 A^

" J

im

^m

-i

loi

^10

l -^

o

l w*

—

i f u

^ m

*-*

^*

^ î

-T

O

^ T

**

**

tj)i

**

W

i

K;S! l

|k :^

^N s

s* -M

5 li

^ -jgs

l ^^^ '|^"

l*^~

'*P

B

"

s "^

l"

*

'5

%'w

S

|2

2lo

5.U

H*]

(*

s i w

5l

to

^Slw

^

m

^

~ '

î

-l -j

^

' -d

^

O)'

î—

-^

-"

'x

-J

w

-.

" '

-. —

jvis

MsS

f.j?

JftS

ji^ I^

jsiis

,2V1*5

.s"*

-,!

Y *-.

'oi

..i B

-i w

^Trw

^-i.^

,*

, *

"^^

.o.

.i*!^

S iK

'*

rs

.10-

a Z

3!i

—

-

-oT

"T -

t n

.1

W

S^

l u

t•-j

^ T-

i ^

B iij

, 5

SC

\5

C

. 'S

î*

N

/lw

^

i -

*

1^

,

IT

l* tt

4®.

m

,r -

~-

.^JE

siL

5

LAP

IER

RE

TW

P

G-6

5

z

c U3 o 0

o l O)

Ministryo

NaturalReso

u

ces

L M

Band

1

ms =

o

o ^

to o

0 ni2 0 o

OD ^

QD

o S Z

CO x

o

-1 I T

2 O m

D

O

w 1

8 m CH 40

CHAINS

O ^

9 6

o

a? S

c

in x

m

c:

* * u

I

rno

D

I

z*

*I

-*

DJ^

W

0 I o

c

o z

-o

o

0 o 0

0

W

Z o J CD

ra ra Q

-i —

"O

o z li o C

9 V

I

CO m

O O

CO

PIF

HE

R T

R

G-I

4I

i H

i a

-nl—

—r—

—

— —

p __

—i —

—

-|;-

s H r*

-, i

w ~

*•^

v i

*.

m"

--t*

- -

- —

——

W~H

|*~

~-T"

l ~2~

*~

2

i i™

—

T

0

'

m

i •k

~ "?

~ ^

.4^T

"5 .

?~ ~

^2" H

T2

( -~

~~

- j

k, ,—

— —

4 -—

-—

—J

—-

'^ ^

* TM

I . m

<<

RIC

KA

BY

TR

G-1

61

o o

O

O l O

) ro

d) a

CD - 2

.

CO O)

o

a

3 o

J z

o H -*

|- m

o

o to o z

s

z

x 2

Z

CO

mz (O X

Z a?

-

^

m ^

"O

5

o 5

o

±5

ffi

H

ffl

tD

^

O

o 33

O(O H

s m -1 i!

o n i >

m m •m O C

s o

s E

I

Z

2 * li o -

LO C

ODZ o z

r, i\

:l

' '

Z

O o o l en

Q O

3 O o D Z n 3

O M. i; i

C

3

C

^!il

5^

—(

S

Z 3

—

i JD

tn -l

3}

15!

5 s

2ss

si 3

5> -C l 41

l i

O O

-l g y z

s*, e

n5

l

C

3

3

>

C

Z -

Z

^

L7) a

mz

m

tof-'

w*

5 ^

-"S

-o e

n

C I

rr ^ ^

> >

o z

en

D O C

of.

O

3

C>

>

n-

3

Z

z

w;

Do

r*

^, rn

D

T-

3

"~

3

p.—

rr

Z

nn

-r.C

r^

oo •*it/j

"-.

-O -t rr Z

I c

5

nJ

x • Z

LO

^ o

r.-r

TT

L:

r.

? I

Doo

ZD |H

O

i-:

5

w2

C c -

x ? S

2:

K o

-^.

. i

'1

H

W

03 n m

^

3-c

o I CO

-c

m .0 •-n 'O

O 1C z m

o ^

en

:CO

l

O

C/}

O z

o

j

Q.

C

i

Elmhirst Twp.(G -162)

TB13 40 L)

MRO (p

1364 T

TB

©"l"0 ^L 4 M 3 M

TB i

659216 '699213TB TB l TB TB

l

TBi

l TB

l TB

TB

i63*829.

TB ' TB TB TB TB TB TB

l 16372 63V33 6373^ 163733963^7336 J637337 (63^38

TB 'TB

'831b592l5 639214

— r~ Tl TB j TB

"TB'T^rTTT"^"'I63736Z '637361

i37335^j637336 1637337 (637^38 "63V8J8 '63^940 ' y[vo '-|e37V52 1637343

TB l TB TB i TB | TB TTB" ~ "^Tfl" ~ "T TB ~ ~ .~TB~ ~ *~TB~ ~ | ^ ^\ft/ l TB~ ~

jx (637398 .637T87 637396J637399 1637384 j6373S3 1617392 1637*091 (637*380 * \* l s -'e37347 (637346(637345

- - - 4 ,' M

5MTB

TB1631

637MI8.ITB

[TBi373J9j6372J3 lTB

6^7143 l(63,

6346

47*78

4M

l 164767*

l

T6

637146

l JK i V iI n t rw u , QmXrD 4 .63 "M6 3 16

- -_ JJrL-.L--J. ITB ITB JTB ITB1 ' i r\s\v6371*47 J637I48 '6S7I49

/B2

\™n TB TB I TB TB /{ TBI4*S'' j* ' S l ^ tf l yX^~S 16377180 [637179 '637)78 637/1 \77le37T7(' ~ V -r— —l—-— ~Tf~~ A Tst-lTB ~ "76 e37l 79

y 1 ' 1D j' ^TB ] TB j TB l

- ' |ri!1'I l^3^!69 [*37TfcB [637167 \

L". -,O" " 'y

! Y^V^HS**1 '63^70 j \/ l \f l l/ l 637173 '637)72 L, ' l?s 6^3^169 I637TBB 637lf-

TB ©I3I4S3I9O6

Lliiy/'A)^

TP © I5I4Z 31907

IB ©1313930963 /J3I027

Q

' ID i ID l lq i 'S |TB

6^6^,63 L^ [^7,66 j^-

TB ~~[~ TB ,TB |T6

J632099 (632)00

l

l'.8*3*68 /i5336*3 ;fafbB54 [675851 ol TB"O ,

TB81*441 l 818449 l

l

6IB444

lJ64SV" ft45S4J 1*45*43^9*4!

l TTg | Tg

J^646648 taMTOjsjn**/^,FB~ "|TB~" ITB645547 j l

V4W* l" ' " ~ ' - . -

•B"" ~ i TB ' TB'6657801 '

l l

l TB

.632IO7 lb32IOEi

T6 ITB

l

TB

TB

,TB

632)0) 1632)02* '446499 446498 44*466" h----r----1 — --4----^TB ITB .TB .TB ITB

l

/XT8

|5M90I |S338f)t ^633503tri--~\*7^W

689T77 '

n^. l TB l TB

^641471

™64^470 ] TB

641474 l TB

TB llTBy

Bearskin l

4731 641474641478, — 1

TB*S6e60

636\U5*

TB

64(489

TB

TB l TB

l 1*414*0

L

ITB TS .TB

16^^16,6869 164146^TTB " TTB P' i 8' '641463

Z 636667 .6368^0 |63687S l /l

riS4ii*4jTB |TB -^ ^ - s i

S3686(

(632)09 :632)IO 1632)11

ITB"" ITB J TB

TB

'|MJ?

- "k TB ! ^

M

4OM

166

TBMy~uqke' TB l

^692147TB ITB" ^

16321*5 |,——X

lv- -|632I62

I632IBI 1632.52 , D " '"^8"64 l'

l

1632)55 i

TB

. TB

TB

632160

TB TB TB

1715601

TB

TB

-.-.— — J- — -..

B l TB

2M - -

TB

|6744

718808 (716606 '716808*718811 1716614 17)80)7

TB j TB j TB 71860) |7I5604|7I6609

l l

TBTB

l1TB

ra

|TB

TB

TD TB TB T8

TB

302466 \ 302709

Tr! T" ' T* ! TB I TB , ,

631*19 1406906 ' 405902 634484 1634481 .634478 694476 .l l ' l i ' l

1 ' '6 l6S44b9 '634466 l

TB 'TB ' re \ TB \TB \TB JTB |TB ITB TB ,T' i \ l * * ! ' ! ! l !b

70 656090 IfaSSOBB 'e i43J7\l 6)4338 U336I8 \ 406907 406904 JB34486 ^^l^^S'6466Z8I LT B

fe49S22x

l- -. -i- ~ ~~-lT"-IM ± | TB l 1 ^ |TB

"^ t645553

lTB

649

(Tr~7~TB~" ~[rr

i6742 74 16 7427(3 .6 74272 "6 742711

|TB~

TB^

, ^ /l 7687)4 lITB ITB

7bB7|ll

:x.[76871^

MICRO WAV t

®

3:3? TW 'III?

M

SI •^aHL^

JS-

5 M 4 ME M

MDLS 19 JS

2M

Vincent Twp.(G-l63)

Lake

J- K, M

42EI3SE9M6 2 6416 KABY LAKE 230

(T) CD

i

o13"O(D

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

S R SUM! ACfc MIC.HIS MR MINING RIGHTS'

Dxcripiion

M N R MOi E C 36/80

SEr 16/80

Order No

W 5/82

W I4/U2

5/8/82

8/11/82

Ultpotitinn

S RBMR

S R

File

770*4

187871

188528

MTC

SAND a GRAVEL

PIT 2C-4O Fil* I6O7O6

" 2C-I511 2

" " "11

l bRAVtU FM* 1630

7 DAU OF ISSUES val 3

.f i 19831

'tf D! NA'.UM! K

LEGEND

PATENTED LANUCHOWN LAND SAI tlFAStSl OCA ILL) LANULICENSE OF OCCUPATIONMINING RIGHTS ONIYSURFACE RIGHFS ONl V

KOAUSIMf'HOVED ROADSKINH'S HIGHWAYSHAM WAYS

POWER LINESMARSH OR MUSKFC,MINFSCANCri UD

PATINT SURFACE ft MINING RIGHTS

SURI^ACl MIC.IHSONLY

C S

(DLot

L O

M R O

b R O

SCALE 1 INCH-40 CHAINS

l M lO 1UOO 4000 6OOO BOOO

O 200l Ut S

100Ul l KM) |2

TOWNSHIP OF

WALTERSMMR ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NIPIGONMINING DIVISION

THUNDER BAYl AND TITLES X REGISTRY DIVISION

THUNDER BAY

Ministry of LandNatural ManagementResources Branch

Ontario

February , I98i G-171

oO*o

oflD'*'CD

ocO4-cu

o(0

o*±o

oCVJ

o j.Za)o oo-*-uj

o u)-*-tn

o ^--*-^-o ro*'O

o O*cvj

o a)*o

o to*o oo

o CM-!.r-ro

o o-*-ID

14+OON.

12-t-OON

fOK)O N

8+OON

6+OON

.242

Location Key l s2-5fv"i!es

^ ^7323 '00 l

3537326^^^373258 ^•637327 6373BI 63733

f. 206"OSJ- 8-t-OON

WALTERS TWP |

23637362 27S 637361 637359 63735To?5;

637372 .295

.27637373259

228

•'^637374 637376B373682

'202—200 -^ -209 .196

637377x -*

3C6 2~7 5Ji\.499 485x273 362

637263 0575 637265 637266

637260.29625*637192

^637(79.200637182 637181637187 188

-—-——

20320637186

coo —'-

-637152 8+00 S

J537I4967637147 26 ^637151 -63714863/319

FARAKEL COMPANYGEOMETRICS G 8)6 MAGNETOMETER

PA l NT AND KABY LAKES PROJECTJELLICOE AREA ONTAR4O637143 637144 637145 r 8 or O, IOO,I5C^OO,250,30O,4OO ft 5OO Gammas

above a background voice of 59,8OO GammasTOTAL FIELD

MAGNETIC SURVEYPAINT LAKE AREA -WEST

SCALE : 4,OOO

2OO - 300

H ILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO ~ . CANADA

i Sept 1982 Scalej I:4,OOO

Dwg,No. 242E13SEMK 2

IB + OOw -

637280 637281637274

637273 P37278

.OOI// 964/495 399 961 61/2-513 292253 240 267 241

•4f5

2BI

297637339637342 : 637343

:40

637351637350 637348 637345

. IB s oo

• 206

B37383738^

—^37385,

^537394266

37393

637168 S37I67,,O

637166637176d6 37173 3S37! e9

637165= 2-5 MilesLocotion Key

637164

- BiOOS637155 37156 637157

EELMHIRST TWP

•29637158 7I603- I4O

INSTRUMENT

GEOMETRICS G BI6 MAGNETOMETERFARAKEL COMPANY

PAINT AND KABY LAKES PROJECTJELLICOE AREA ONTARIO

Main Control Base Slotion ot 0*00 Contours ot 0,IOO,lrO,200 250, 300,400 S6OO Gammas

QDove a tackqround vo.ue of 59,BOO Gammas TOTAL FIELD

MAGNETIC SURVEY PAINT LAKE AREA -EAST

SCALE : 4.00O

HILL,GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Dote, Sept 198? Scole^ 1:4,000^-

Dwg No. 442E13SE***6 Z.5415 KABY LAKE

— 34+00 N

32)

205

22-637313=20637311

30-K)0 N

637304637306125 -110

LOCATION KEY 1=25 Miles

Kocy - ^ W ,Kocy L N 5;

Kacy L west 'Ksc/ . Ecst v

BASE -INE C

ELMHIRST T;VF

7/303T637302^637301^n*L NE/l; V

ua*

WALTERS TWP.

22-*-OON.

37285637286

3537288

637292 6372916372337294 l63

637280 637282637281

SCALE

l: 4,000

20O 3OO 4OO 5OO Metres

42EI3SEM46 2.541S KABY LAKE 260

INSTRUMENT- GEOMETRICS G 816 MAGNETOMETER

O*-f- o

^

O4- O)

o o•4- 00

oOD•t-

o (04-

?o o

rvj*- fO

o o O

00 o(O* at

o ^~*-

20

OraOO•*-O)

oCD O

ID O CM

t-

.IM.

Oo4-

o

Id OCVJ

Od—l—

O1C4-ro

O CDt-

oo4-

CD

Orv/4-

LJO'i-00

-i—

Ul O

o oo o

o•t-

OCMV

O (Ov

10

O ODk

to

ui o of. CO

lilofj•f O)

.J—

Ul O (O

o(M

o00

(M

FARAKEL COMPANYPAINT AND KABY LAKES PROJECT

JELLICOE AREA ONTARIO

TOTAL FIELDMAGNETIC SURVEY

PAINT LAKE AREA NORTHEASTHILL,GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Date; Sept 1982 Scale) l: 4,000Dwg. No. 6

62)0848-:!! G408827;

-58 -58 374 34 57 S3 -ei ' 2\ -28 -10

Location, Key l"^ 2 5 Miles -

FARAKEL COMPANY

PAINT AND KABY LAKES PROJECT JELLICOE AREA ONTARIO


KABY LAKE AREA- WESTWALTERS TWP. HILL,GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED

TORONTO CANADAINSTRUMENT

GEOMETRICS G 816 MAGNETOMETER l 4,000

200 30ODate, Sept 1982 Scale , l . 4,00

Dwg No 8

O (M 8

00

O00

o(Ot in

O •f

oM ^ K)

O O

O CO o

U)-*- en

O^f•f00

OCVJ

O O•*- CO

O OD

O U)f- rO

O ^f•h

O cvjOo

UI

t

l uio ^r•i-C\J

ui o10•*- ro

luio oo

UIo o(O

UIo(M

17 ui o *•f (D

UIo (O•f-(Tt

UIo00

i;ui o o

UIO (M•f K)

122146 Sr^V-SB (\

637131637130637112--637242 637101637241^637226.

.'1637090 637102637240.,.637129

63706863724429

6s637l0365

637239" 637128 637133

637127 637134

637097. 637104 •OC637H4

6372456372381537229

637135, 637126'6371157837I05637096 -^637230 2 T637237 637246

20+OOSV

*0637236 l/•I98637231 637247

, •*" ,-^5,. ,8V vi '

637125 21637095

637094. .696,37167 637117

537248.,,'

\ i i 'T ,l2 i 72 [-73 -74/ 3ly J 75//435.11? (.244/^25 .309 .321

ipfi " -r^"^^ ' ^oo T-^---,-

637249 •"637123637093 637118 6374m637234

7=632073

632074'^'-y-.423^

5637403

632075 207840

7*37119107

637255

^32077199 637121

637(206371 I.QH\637254

"632272 INSTRUMENT

GEOMETRICS G 816 MAGNETO

Contours ot 0,50,100,150,200, 300,500 a above a background volue of 60.00C

Mgin Control Base Station on Base Lme Vat 0^00

SCALE . 4,OOO

00 3OOCS-637637252 .

1 1ui ui O 04- to•f 4.*r C

i.UI O00^

!S

iui OO^OD

ui 0(Mf(Tt

U O*o(VI

.113 .135 KABY LAKE Bose Line "u"100

RICKABY TWP.

2+00 S

4+00 S

6+00 S.

8+OO S

lOi-OO S

.69 Base Line "V12+00 S

IQO

I4+OOS

IOO

16-rOO S

200

18+00 S

20+00 S

22+00 S

i Key * 25 Miles

Kahy l N W Kaby L ,Nf

-U-

24+OO S

26+00 S

-24 -3 -ZO -32 -34 - Basa Line "W 28+00 S

30+OO S

.95 ^

32+00 S.

34+00 S

36+00 S

38+00 S

ui oO 1-

(D

ui oW +at

40+00 S

UIo

oCVJ

ETER

X) Commas Sommor

500m

UJ0

UJ0 (Of if)




KABY LAKE AREA -EASTHILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Date, Sept 1982 Scale, 1-4,000

Df.No.IO

oCM*to

O O-*- CJ't

o(D4- O

a:Oto-f en ro

^O^4 CD ro

OCVJ1- N ro

O O

ro

C"o?

CO

o(O

ro

6374

i. V i^ 7449-i"/or - i

Base Line *U"

42E13SEM06 2.6416 KABY LAKE

*

O sr4-

OCM4-

O O-r- 8

4-CD CVJ

O (O4- N (M

i

i

O t4- (O W

oCJ 4- lO

lk

ii

Xx'

\/*: js/.

Base Line "Y" - 20+OON

- 19 + 00 N

- 18-t-00 N

- 17-^00 N

^;vT;f;i:y j

\1 r A. pTT Vj

1

1

\

\

\

463\

rto

V//'fV 1

J,1

x f

lV

1

ilfx/i*

r

VIrV

\

?.*

j!.;\*' \.L! -H:*~

j*/t ^"

. ffj

. 4-/

r le*

i. ,oJ1! f*L"'4fVj ^

w /.ji B k?'*' \

. l 4^ l" * 1i *

hV'V Jl JA<c iX J S' 1.y,.Mf-1C;~)**( , j\tx.* "\

; \; /n .j; /r* :: ,Jt xi /^ (

\ X.

-i lo* .; , M 7i"' \ . ,, ./4J - *

±-Ui —— Hr*l* /' xJ \

. l,/ lV i. ii- v7 '. (tv- ^V i

iA Ji *" -'J 'i i\ 1

'3-J J

/.^

i

i1

i f

f lf

t'

it

i\i

}T\i '1 "

\

\

—

-rx1

1

[4

-!•^ ^

M ^— ^^ l^^•^

- iu

. III

- }jj

- 4*

- Ifi

. ^

•^

. vJ

Ud 1' (F'w '

, IfJ *4

" V\" l^ ;; Vii w /if " ML, —— j\ ii\ j* -^i' \ A

X i

i'* i r'/ Xfv* * 1 ' ^ '*-ff M

i (? it-? 'fe/ i

t J 4v 7

. X'r* k•' Xx fit

1 ' -^ /oi/ \

1 [i /or\ \ -x,,,.

Z ,tt X . i 1 \ '

w' ML —— \^~Vn* J

7lkt \ \ **1*1 vJ

- A (IU J i 7 '(u it ) ^\ ^f*N S,

y *, f lLi! *i '4 i*) r7 ' /:i" : (l ri *(l 'L \

i

r*^~ Bo3e Line U

\

RADEM PROFILE SCALES

INSTRUMENT CRONE RADEM VLF

STATION - SEATTLE WASHINGTON 24-8 Hz

Metres

i. l Ol l OM J fVI

OZUJorH (rt

Q



VLF PROFILESKABY LAKE AREA NORTHWEST

HILL,GOETTLER,DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Dote,, Sept. 1982 Scale; l'4,000

Dwg No l 24+/L

6408176408/2640805637500637492

- 4-1-00 N

640802637490 637/00#37242

INSTRUMENT CRONERADEM VLF

STATION- SEATTLE WASHINGTON 24 8 Hz

SCALE

|:4,000

42E136Eei*6 Z 64 IS KA0Y LAKE 300

JCJJ3727I 63279637273 6372746-3727E

VS/SW/AZ

ELMHIRST TWP.

63.338733T6

63735

/7380 •^3738367382

63;738 63\738

1467 6"572 34/4

i * . f *

Vi' - J -V\. c ,f4

V&P* 37168 637167 63TI66x- 4613716'63T!* .7

6371656371646^71636'3 715 6LEGEND

CONDUCTOR AXIS

rJTERPRETED GEO OGICAL BOUNDARY RADEM PROFILE SCALES

- 4*00 S

- 6*00 S

- 8*0O S

CM CM

OD

^ "^^^ ^- .-——-^7 -x ' :— ^-S: ^ ^ 3: ^ 3: ^ :o o o o o o Q ( ^^(\jooo*fi^r ff -f- -t- -t- -t- 4- ^^joo'cocoin'r n^ w — — — — .

^ ^r

S - —— CONDUCTOR AXIS

/^ .... ,... .." INTERPRETED GEOLOGICAL BOUN DARY•**.^^

^^^^3:^^^:^^^ luuuiûiuujujujujujui 3 OOoOoOOOO 0 OOo9 OQ OQOOooOyOooio^cooeoto^S owit^ô^^â'oca*J- + ^• + ±-*--t••>•^^•*•^•(•^^l•*•|i + •K i + ±•|•fjWOcn^N-lDf'OcU — O — C\if05j- U)^ a) (7iO(XJ'2*

1

1((

(

Ui0 tt)(O

j W Ui UJ Ui) o o o o * o w ^ Si- -1- 4- -t- -^? 5 51 8 CM

INSTRUMENT

' CRONE RADEM VLF Station -SEATTLE WASHINGTON 24-8 K Hz

SCALE 1 : 4,OOO

0 5G .GO 200 3CO 400 5OG -n

^ FARAKEL COMPANY

PAINT AND KABY LAKES PROJECT


VLF PROFILES

PAINT LAKE AREA - EAST

HILL, GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Dote; Sept 1982 Seal*} 1:4,000

D"* Nal7 A/7^^42E13SEM46 Z 54'S KABY LAKE 310 7

— 34+00 N

— 32tOON

30-4-00 N

637307-\"- 2-5 MilesLocation Key

I 637310'

RICKABY TvVPELMHIRST

— 24+OON637301637299637297^

•t8 \* -6372986372.96

WALTERS T'A P

- 22+OON

—20+00N637289637*294 637293

—18-^-00 N

f

AREALAKEK48 y 637475

TOWNSHIPRICKABY

3746*)

6-0-29*

6-40/4 B 4

637202

C40882 640D85408

64d863

f * - 10' *u ' \?..f ' - 'li6*401862 406*7 637200

637199

640&791 *. /o6,40861

6371^8,

64088^:\64086640B32 / O .i. *

' i ^U.I *- t

''1637197.64089fQ'..64Q872 6408fedn;

M 640859^640834,

4085&^640891 63,7196

'A" r

O 8 35}* 640838-

6.^.0857 40874 640892 6 37J9 5

6A0835 60856 6 37 rg 4

^•37193"

LEGEND

CONDUCTOR AXIS

...' INTERPRETED GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARY'i' RADEW PROFILE

ELMHIRST TWP

.^ _ ., ..N

LEDUC TWP

637476 3 MB ft*/

\\

\

7205lif 'S*'

- i

637206 J

*

\

.x

/'l

637 2|2f4**

l

\,

6372^8

/o'

•z \

\/o'

N

\/O'

It!

10

It

\

y

K30N

H .11ne U Oi-O

\2+00!

\

/

A4*OOS

6tOO SH

-2

8*OO S.

\ 10+00 S.-H 'i1/v\

It

l*

1C 637221

I8t00 S-J

lo

aotoos

2202 2+00 S J

1-00 S.-

it

65 72192GfOO S -H

. -z.'

Base

•i

Vo 26^00 S

t

6372II 637218\ i

637212 6372I7

63^^725 '63 721 657216 '" 36*00 Si

\

•' : . i "l '-63*Vi /'r. 7X ;S*.-^ 7/•^

\ I'j

\

\

-

/;

"-MOO



VLF PROFILES

KABY LAKE AREA- WESTHILL.GOETTL7R, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Dote, Sept 1982 Scale; l: 4,000

Owg No |9

63P7242637214I6'3J(J2

6 3 724 O.7 --"-(B 3 7 221 6:^7243 63709 63710

63703 63,714263724

63724", 637127 637134

63713637126

|6 3 71 L! 5

6^7117

63711 8637093

j'6 37^34

637119

637ES5

637120

6372.5

RADEM PROFILE SCALES

•^•CONDUCTOR AXIS

.* INTERPRETED GEOLOGICAL BOUNDARY

63725 637NI

12E13SEM06 2.&415 KABY LAKE

1UJoof(VI

1

UJOW

fO

Ulo

*

1Ulo(04~ in

iUJ OCO

(0

1

UlOoCO

1UloCVJ

en

UJO?O/VICM

KABY LAKEBase Line "U" 0*00

o

*0

l)

O

O

- i

RICKABY TWP.\

2+00 S-

4+00 S-

\•C*

6+00 S.-

1

\

lx* k

M*

/O

/ 0

/f)

i J

8*00 s

10+00 S

\:

*i" \t

b\

\

*v Base Line "v"\: ," i

,. \

12+00 S-

4 it-

\i\\

14*^005. -

16 K)0 S -•i-

L \ A K A K e

18*00 S.-

20+00 S.-

22+00 S-Location-Key l"* 2-5 Mi.

Kaby L NW : Knhy

WALTERS TWP. i

24tOO S i

26tOO S-

Lme W.28+00 S-

3O+OO S-

32+00 S.-

34+00 S

36+00 S.

38+00 S-

40*00 S

ui O oo*(O

UJoo4 (D

UlO (VI•f 01

•l-oCVJ

UJO O*CVJ

OCVJt to

UJo

UJ

o(O•J- in

UMENT

RONE RADEM VLF

i-SEATTLE WASHINGTON 24-8 KHz.

SCALE l . 4,000

200 300 •400 500m



VLF PROFILES

KABY LAKE AREA -EAST

HILL,GOETTLER, DE LAPORTE LIMITED TORONTO CANADA

Date j S*pt 1982 Scale; 11 4,000

Base Line

Tic Line

LEGENDLOCATED CLAIM POSTSCLAIM LINESAPPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ROADTOWNSHIP LINEAPPROXIMATE TOWNSHIP LINECLIFFINSTRUMENT: SCINTREX MF-1 VERTICAL FIELD FLUXGATE MAGNETOMETER CONTOUR INTERVAL 500 GAMMAS

JELLIC.O PROJECT MAGNETIC MAP

farakel company ^ r, /* ^ f, v/ paint and kaby lake project · 2017. 1. 17. · farakel company ^...

Documents